t; On 8/2/23 16:07, Andrew Hughes wrote:
>
> Hi Guys,
>
> Thanks for the quick responses!
>
> Andrew Harvey: traffic_sign=AU:R6-22,G9-83 seems better than
> traffic_sign=AU:R6-22;AU:G9-83 but I can see why you say both would be
> valid.
> Q: Let's say there is also an
9 Feb 2023 at 12:31, Andrew Hughes wrote:
>
>> And each culvert has a unique asset/ref identification (example Victorian
>> Dept of Transport, Structure Number == SN2252)
>>
>>
> Sorry to be awkward, but do we have permission to
Either way it would be beneficial to at least describe this in the Ozzie
> roads wiki when its settled, maybe under an infrastructure heading.
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Roads
>
>
>
> Cheers - Phil
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Dec 2, 2020, 05:30 by 61sundow...@gmail.com:
>
> On 2/12/20 3:54 am, Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-au wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Dec 1, 2020, 01:17 by 61sundow...@gmail.com:
>
> On 1/12/20 12:18 am, Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-au wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Nov 30, 2020, 13:10
097
Many thanks,
Andrew
On Wed, 8 Feb 2023 at 11:41, Andrew Hughes wrote:
>
> Looking good. Given...
>
> Node: traffic_sign=AU:R6-22
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3227568911
>
> Way: low_gears:hgv=designated
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/245284221
>
&
Looking good. Given...
Node: traffic_sign=AU:R6-22
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3227568911
Way: low_gears:hgv=designated
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/245284221
Question:
The tagging of the way does not use the AU:R6-22 (signage) code. Can
anyone elaborate on why this is?
agged on a node, or maybe a node (member) of a
way, but definitely not an area that can't be defined and is not suitable
to the way itself in my mind.
Thoughts are definitely welcome.
--AH
On Tue, 17 Jan 2023 at 11:30, Graeme Fitzpatrick
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, 17 Jan 2023 at 10:40, And
hazard. It is the steep hill that
>> is the hazard (where the mitigation strategy for HGVs is to use low gears.
>> Same for rollover/sharp bend.
>>
>> - Ben
>>
>>
>> On Wed, 18 Jan 2023 at 10:38, Andrew Hughes wrote:
>>
>>> Thank
7 Jan 2023 at 11:30, Graeme Fitzpatrick
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, 17 Jan 2023 at 10:40, Andrew Hughes wrote:
>
>> There are other signage like "No Engine Breaking", could anyone propose a
>> convention inline with the above that could be extended for such additional
Hi All,
Can anyone suggest the most appropriate way to take ways where the road is
signed with "Use Low Gears"?
Bonus questions...
1. In the case of SA, there's online reference material and even an Act to
enforce this legally. How/Should that be tagged ref::: and how so, that
this is the SA
Hi Dian,
Working with the National Heavy Vehicle Regulator and having data that
honours the jurisdiction geography (I.e. state/territory border) is
invaluable to us.
I believe... Ways and State Route (relations) should split at the border.
State routes typically form as members of the national
- WAY...
- WAY...
The above would allow a way's membership and hierarchy to be traversed.
*Thoughts?*
Please let me know CHEEERS!
On Thu, 11 Aug 2022 at 14:50, Andrew Davidson wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 11:48 AM Andrew Hughes wrote:
> > Some worldwide
Hi All,
I've been looking into how National, State and possibly Regional road
routes are tagged in Australia.
Our goal is to be able to determine if any given way is a member of a road
route, and if that road route is National, State, Regional, tourist route
such as...
-
Hi All,
I'm creating my first MapRoulette challenges as a learning exercise and
they involve simply tag edits only.
I found this vid that shows how to perform simple tag only edits in
MapRoulette https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kLlvp_3l97c
Challenge is here
together on mapping activities in
> a coordinated way. Any questions feel free to ask.
>
> On Fri, 22 Apr 2022 at 14:30, Andrew Hughes wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Would anyone be able to please point me in the right direction? I am
>> looking to learn more about mappin
Hi All,
Would anyone be able to please point me in the right direction? I am
looking to learn more about mapping teams and how to create one for the
National Heavy Vehicle Regulator https://www.nhvr.gov.au/
I have looked high and low, but I can't anything.
Thanks in advance,
Andrew
Thank you all for your contributions to this thread so far, much
appreciated!
*Please correct me if you disagree with this...*
1. So it would seem that ALL roads should be tagged with maxspeed and
assigned a numeric value (kph), where the maxspeed is known.
2. Supplementary to #1. the
Hi All,
First, I thought the tagging guidelines were "don't tag unless it's a
non-default value" (my language to describe this might be inaccurate, feel
free to improve). If this is true, then I shouldn't tag rural ALL
roads with maxspeed. It's only those that are "non-default".
*Can anyone
Hi All,
We're using OSM and pgrouting and it's GREAT!
Something that I have found difficult to come to terms with, is assigning a
"default speed" for unclassified roads (without a maxspeed tag). This is
because in metro area's these are most-likely to be 50kph. However, out in
regional areas
follows a road it is in the
> centre of the gap between the properties that are either side of the road
> and that centre line is not always the paved road that you see on the
> ground.
>
>
>
> Michael
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Dian Ågesson
> *Sent:* Friday, 7 Janua
Hi All,
Since I am only trying to define those that cannot be determined spatially,
this sounds correct to me: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:is_in
Explanation: Yes, they do say that the use is discouraged, but that is
purely on the basis of boundaries being used as spatial
Hi All,
In the interest of stirring up a hornets nest (jokes). I'd like to know
what could be said for tagging ways (streets/roads) with add:suburb (or
addr:county...) where the suburb (or other region/area) the road "belongs"
to can NOT be spatially determined (i.e. typically runs along or forms
ike you are describing
> frontage roads (what we would call service roads in Australia). Rather
> confusingly, the service tag isn’t the best tag for these roads;
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Frontage_road has a good explanation.
>
> Dian
>
> On 2021-11-19 15:56, Andrew H
Hi Again,
With regards to service roads. I would like to know if there is a tagging
convention that would provide a distinction between roads that appear to
all fall under highway=service for the following examples:
Example A: This is what is referred to "traditionally" as a "service road"
orts,
> Ports, Forestry Corporations, private mine site operators, private retail
> companies eg https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q18378048
>
> If you preferred to store this directly in OSM, then something like your
> second option operator:type:government=state could work.
>
> On Fri
parklands, a local
> library as part of the development. If the community is gated then they may
> have to maintain things, do rubbish collection and disposal ...
>
>
> On Tue, 9 Nov 2021 at 17:31, Andrew Hughes wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I was wondering ho
Hi All,
I was wondering how I could tag ways that would indicate that they are
belonging to "non-government" - aka these are private assets and do not
belong to the public sector.
Some examples would be ways within:
- housing estates
- gated communities
- within an
de.
>
> On Thu, 21 Oct 2021 at 11:29, Andrew Hughes wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> It looks like the minutely updates for Aust. stopped updating ~1am
>> yesterday (Wednesday 20th October) Brisbane Time (UTC
>> 2021-10-19T14\:54\:14Z).
>>
>> Live State
Hi All,
It looks like the minutely updates for Aust. stopped updating ~1am
yesterday (Wednesday 20th October) Brisbane Time (UTC
2021-10-19T14\:54\:14Z).
Live State:
http://download.openstreetmap.fr/replication/oceania/australia/minute/state.txt
At the time of writing this email the state.txt
a single bridge, whereas without it, it would be unclear.
>
> I think the ref=* tag on man_made=bridge, and bridge:ref=* tag on
> highway=* is the way to go.
>
> Bob for your case I'd go with aeroway:ref=* for the airstrip reference,
> leaving ref=* for the road reference.
>
Hi All,
I've found an appropriate tag of bridge:name and have applied it to the
bridge: https://www.openstreetmap.org/search?query=Merimbula%20Lake%20Bridge
But I also know this bridge has an asset id of "BID7" for the asset owner.
These asset id's are frequently referenced within the transport
Hi All,
Thanks everyone for your feedback.
We would like the culvert to be an 'isolated' segment of road for a number
of reasons. General (light vehicle) limits are typically signed however
anything that is 'really heavy' such as a mobile crane, concrete pump or
heavy freight are assessed
troversial.
Thanks for taking a look, much appreciated.
Andrew
On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 at 10:40, Graeme Fitzpatrick
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 at 10:19, Andrew Hughes wrote:
>
>>
>> Questions : What are the correct tagging for the ways below?
>>
>
> S
Hi All,
Apologies for the boring subject, but I'd like to talk about mapping out
Culverts on (way/highway) roads.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Culvert
The reason we would like to map these is that they influence road usage and
in particular usage for heavy vehicles. They are very much like a
Hi All,
We expect to encounter the same problem at the NHVR if we begin to use OSM.
My (possibly unfounded) initial thoughts are based around linking the OSM &
Source feature outside OSM in something similar to a "join" table. The join
might be on attribution (id), geometry or both. Then, you
l change our tactics and raise other questions... something I will
take up on another thread.
Thanks everyone for your help, much appreciated - look forward to speaking
with you next!
Andrew Hughes
p.s. Apologies to Andrew Harvey... two Andrew H's in here and he was here
first. Maybe I
gorithm" might be helpful but only to a point.
I don't believe this is a blocker for OSM within the NHVR. It simply means
we have to approach this from another angle.
Thanks for everyones responses while I get up to speed.
Andrew Hughes
On Tue, 7 Jul. 2020, 7:31 pm Andrew Harvey,
wrote:
>
-24 months through GIS and we are very enthusiastic to learn and contribute
to OSM. I hope to be speaking with you a lot more in the near future.
Thanks in advance,
Andrew Hughes
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstr
38 matches
Mail list logo