On 8 December 2010 11:57, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
compatible with ODbL+CT; and to publish this information for the benefit of
future mappers.
In addition, some licences (such as the new UK Open Government Licence)
openly avow compatibility with ODC's attribution licences
On 8 December 2010 10:37, Simon Ward si...@bleah.co.uk wrote:
On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 07:58:26PM +0100, Frederik Ramm wrote:
ODbL is not a PD license, so you do not have to be afraid.
The Contributor Terms effectively change the licence.
Frederik seems to consistently misrepresent the license
On 8 December 2010 11:08, Grant Slater openstreet...@firefishy.com wrote:
Disappointing as ever... [citation needed]
What is disappointing is you can't or won't spend the time to brush up
on the history of the license debate, or when you see a false
statement being made repeatedly and you don't
On 8 December 2010 12:44, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Hi,
John Smith wrote:
Frederik seems to consistently misrepresent the license in this sort
of dishonest fashion,
Well at least I'm not misrepresenting my identity. I also think that all
So in other words it's ok to lie
On 6 December 2010 23:55, Serge Wroclawski emac...@gmail.com wrote:
This should really be taking place on the legal list but nonetheless:
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 7:09 AM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
So, this is awkward. According to my profile, I've agreed to the
new
Have you looked at these pages:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Vandalism
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Vandalism
On 5 December 2010 17:43, Andrew Harvey andrew.harv...@gmail.com wrote:
I think that this
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/6545161 should be
Three Russian satellites have crashed into the Pacific Ocean after a
failed launch at the weekend, in a setback to a Kremlin project
designed as a rival to the widely-used US GPS navigation technology.
Russian news agencies say the satellites veered off course and crashed
near Hawaii after
This post seems to indicate the legal issues have been sorted out, and
the terms the imagery can be used under:
http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Opengeodata/~3/kukbUtOllso/microsoft-imagery-details
I also started making a relation showing areas that Bing covers for Australia:
On 28 November 2010 23:34, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
of the Nearmap preset from JOSM. It does seem to me like the removal
is aligned with Ben Last's request to remove a similar preset from
Judging from a reply from Frederik it seems it was done out of spite,
FUD or to coerce
On 27 November 2010 19:08, Andrew Harvey andrew.harv...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 10:49 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
You can of course fork whatever you like, but allow me to point out that
(1) if you are unhappy with the slippy map plugin, why not fork that
Does this mean talks with Nearmap has failed to come to an amicable arrangement?
before:
http://svn.openstreetmap.org/applications/editors/josm/plugins/slippymap/src/org/openstreetmap/josm/plugins/slippymap/SlippyMapPreferences.java?p=24300
after:
On 26 November 2010 20:18, Emilie Laffray emilie.laff...@gmail.com wrote:
As far as I can tell, we are still talking with Nearmap to find a compromise
acceptable to both party. The last email I exchanged with Ben Last was last
night. I don't think we are near a breakdown in communication at
On 25 November 2010 17:39, ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert
Gremmen g.grem...@cetest.nl wrote:
The position is a fact, name is a fact, cuisine they serve is a fact,
along with the other details.
Facts cannot be copyright. Creative Commons licences are not designed
for factual
On 25 November 2010 09:30, Erik Johansson erjo...@gmail.com wrote:
3. give the finger to all people anti ODbL
At least you are being honest, which is more than Frederik seems to be
capable of, you don't make any pretense that there was ever any kinda
of democratic process going on and the whole
On 25 November 2010 12:05, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
Frederik is a generous and respected contributor to the OpenStreetMap
community. His record speaks for itself and he doesn't need me or
anybody else to stand up for him.
Regardless of other deeds, he has been less than
On 25 November 2010 12:14, Grant Slater openstreet...@firefishy.com wrote:
On 25 November 2010 02:10, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 November 2010 12:05, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
Frederik is a generous and respected contributor to the OpenStreetMap
community
On 25 November 2010 12:41, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 9:22 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
How charming that you use selective quoting to fabricate a lie of
omission. Viewing the original shows no lie. And that your
fabrication failed
On 25 November 2010 12:57, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
landuse, and at a stretch, bike paths etc. I guess John Smith will be
mapping out the boundaries of the coverage? Should be interesting.
There is no news here until they actually allow it, so far they are
claiming they can't
On 25 November 2010 13:20, Grant Slater openstreet...@firefishy.com wrote:
On 25 November 2010 03:00, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 November 2010 12:57, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
landuse, and at a stretch, bike paths etc. I guess John Smith will be
mapping
On 24 November 2010 07:36, Christoph Donges cdon...@gmail.com wrote:
In a park there is a set of rails and small trains that pull 2 or 3
carriages that people can sit on.
Here are some photos:
http://amynaomi.blogspot.com/2010/03/trains.html
I have tagged it as railway=narrow_gauge but I
On 24 November 2010 13:54, Christoph Donges cdon...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks. I couldn't find that.
It needs to be added to the railway section of map features, but for
what ever reason it was overlooked previously...
___
Talk-au mailing list
Has anyone been mapping the evacuation locations and so on?
http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/11/13/3065704.htm
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=-7.547lon=110.4445zoom=12layers=M
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
On 12 November 2010 22:47, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Hi,
On 11/12/10 13:04, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
If we go by what the JOSM introduction page says (OpenStreetMap is
changing
its license), will is correct.
Please stop this immediately.
“Methinks He Doth Protest Too
On 12 November 2010 03:24, Serge Wroclawski emac...@gmail.com wrote:
In other words, we don't know why someone doesn't agree to the new CT.
Yes because some don't want those sorts of answers known... As 80n
keeps pointing out, everything done so far is part of a war of
attrition...
-- Forwarded message --
From: Fabian Schmidt fschm...@informatik.uni-leipzig.de
Date: 12 November 2010 02:41
Subject: [OSM-talk] license change map
To: t...@openstreetmap.org
As the license thermometer[1] turns greener I was interested in how
far this already effects the map
-- Forwarded message --
From: David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au
Date: 12 November 2010 11:37
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] license change map
To: Fabian Schmidt fschm...@informatik.uni-leipzig.de
Cc: t...@openstreetmap.org
From looking at a few different cities in this map, it is
On 11 November 2010 04:28, hbogner hbog...@gmail.com wrote:
Thats nice but I would like to map time zones as single relation for one
time zone, as in one relation for time zone UTC +1, one for UTC+2 and so on.
Which way would be better, to make entire country relation as part of UTC+-X
On 9 November 2010 11:47, Serge Wroclawski emac...@gmail.com wrote:
The main database includes the historical data, there's just not a
programmatic way to access it via the current API.
He isn't the first, and I'm sure he won't be the last to ask for
changes to the API to accommodate historical
On 9 November 2010 12:44, Laurence Penney l...@lorp.org wrote:
Using start_date and end_date tags on two way IDs (one for the Palace in its
first position, another for its second) might be a reasonable way to map the
Crystal Palace.
One way to handle this would be to update the API to
On 9 November 2010 15:24, Michal Migurski m...@stamen.com wrote:
Would this apply to the planet, as well?
I would suggest that the main planet dump would keep the status quo,
that is default to current objects only.
___
talk mailing list
On 8 November 2010 22:57, John Henderson snow...@gmx.com wrote:
Or put them in road tunnels like Sydney's M5, so that visitors like me using
OSM get told about the correct exit inside the tunnel instead of being told
we've missed the turn when we eventually exit.
This sort of thing is being
On 9 November 2010 15:40, ed...@billiau.net wrote:
As far as my reading got, this could work with a smart phone, as the
additional signals were broadcast on 2.4GHz, but not on a consumer GPS.
Is this the something like wifi triangulation, which a number of
companies (eg skyhook, google, apple,
Stephen Von Worley has some fun reversing the distortions of the
Mercator projection, which exaggerates the size of things at the poles
in order to achieve consistent compass bearings. He imagines what
would happen if Greenland was on the equator and Africa in the Arctic,
and goes on to do the
On 5 November 2010 00:26, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote:
A parking area may have lit/unlit parts, and most of these areas are too
large to simply tag the whole area as lit/unlit. Ive had a look through
You could have 2 parking areas and mark one as lit and one that isn't...
One
On 5 November 2010 10:54, Andrew Harvey andrew.harv...@gmail.com wrote:
The two parking areas issue is the same issue as needing to split a highway in
order to tag different segments with different maxspeeds. For example if we
have
(best read with a monospaced font),
Most either can't do
On 5 November 2010 11:33, Andrew Harvey andrew.harv...@gmail.com wrote:
Like putting a way down the middle of each lane and then tieing that
back to the road, or like just adding a lane:n:feature = value to the
existing road way? Then you could do something like lane:0:restriction
=
On 2 November 2010 00:19, Andrew Errington a.erring...@lancaster.ac.uk wrote:
ford=yes on a way means (to me) that this segment of the way is often covered
with water. ford=yes on a node means (to me) that the ford is very short.
Except in drier areas where they mostly aren't covered with
On 1 November 2010 11:44, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
Municipalities shouldn't write licenses; it ain't their job. It ain't
their core competence. Their citizens ain't paying for the city to do
license composition and maintenance.
Regardless what we'd like, we should be happy they
On 1 November 2010 02:40, Toby Murray toby.mur...@gmail.com wrote:
Currently the checkbox has absolutely no bearing on the license that
your data is distributed under. It really is just a statement of
purpose which is noted in the account settings but doesn't actually
DO anything.
Most people
On 30 October 2010 00:07, Mike Dupont jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com wrote:
I have written to the people who donated the data to dual license it
under the oodbl as well as under the creative commons.
http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/summary/
That may not be enough, as they would
On 30 October 2010 03:56, Mike Dupont jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com wrote:
I see, and there is no way around this? So everyone in the world
become bound by the contributor terms? does anything think this is
even feasible?
Those trying to push OSM towards PD think it's feasible and are doing
On 30 October 2010 04:28, Kai Krueger kakrue...@gmail.com wrote:
There appear to be some interesting thoughts about this in the most recent
LWG meeting minutes ( https://docs.google.com/View?id=dd9g3qjp_89cczk73gk )
in the Contributor Terms Revision section:
Until recently there was no
On 25 October 2010 15:52, Nic Roets nro...@gmail.com wrote:
Launched in the UK ? I guess that is why I have never heard of it.
Considering it's 1 of many android handsets I can't say I'm surprised
exactly, there seems to be a new one out every other week and they
seem to alternate between being
There was/is very good reasons why highway=ford wasn't good enough for
ways, but why do nodes need to be updated at all?
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Has any progress been made on this front at all?
I noticed in the latest minutes[1] that the LWG has no plans to
address the section(s) that Nearmap objected to, and previous
minutes[2] didn't show any resolution either.
[1] https://docs.google.com/View?id=dd9g3qjp_87d3bmhxgc
[2]
On 16 October 2010 19:08, Al Haraka alhar...@gmail.com wrote:
initiatives mentioned before. However, I think we should keep it
plain and simple and remove some caustic behavior that seems to be
returning to the list after a hiatus. Collaboration and consideration
Most of the caustic
On 16 October 2010 19:21, Al Haraka alhar...@gmail.com wrote:
I did not single out anyone on purpose, because this is not going to
be productive OR solve the current issue. Whether it is SteveC or any
This thread/idea started because of suggestions made previously by
SteveC and now he's the
On 17 October 2010 00:36, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
Oh hardly. All I have done is call out Anthony and link to the things he
denies about wikipedia.
What specifically has any of that to do with OSM?
You, too, are another example of someone using a fake name and occasionally
On 17 October 2010 00:58, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
I wish i had a pony.
This is why things end up in a endless debate, people pose serious
questions and you either can't be bothered, or won't respond properly
so the debate can move forward.
On 17 October 2010 01:16, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
Well that's kind of hilarious given you cut out the first half of my email
where I exactly answered your question Duane.
What ever you say Mark, but then again I've come to expect side
stepping from you, making any claim you wish
On 10 October 2010 16:57, Andrew Harvey andrew.harv...@gmail.com wrote:
An OSM file like the osmChange ... ones (eg.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/changeset/0123/download), or the
osm ... one that JOSM can save new edits as when you go FileSave As?
As JOSM spits out, that way the
On 10 October 2010 17:25, Andrew Harvey andrew.harv...@gmail.com wrote:
How do you tell the changes from the things that haven't changed when
viewing this in JOSM though?
You load a new layer from the DB and can compare the 2...
___
Talk-au mailing
The world's biggest book fair in Frankfurt is used to seeing some big
book launches, but none came larger than a six-by-nine-foot (1.82 by
2.74 metres) atlas unveiled on Wednesday.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/10/06/3031388.htm
___
Talk-au
On 1 October 2010 21:04, Rob Myers r...@robmyers.org wrote:
You're joking. It's a few pints worth of money.
Nice, just insult most people not in a first world nation, that sort
of money is a months worth of wages (or more) to some...
___
legal-talk
On 2 October 2010 12:04, Serge Wroclawski emac...@gmail.com wrote:
In general the reason a project forks is that the original project has
stagnated and the current maintainers are unresponsive. Or (as we're
seeing now with many of the Sun projects), the original maintainer is
no longer going
On 30 September 2010 18:31, Rob Myers r...@robmyers.org wrote:
On 09/30/2010 02:56 AM, John Smith wrote:
Those sorts of comments are made to distract from the real issue, that
they know that the license is most likely incompatible, and because it
most likely won't effect them personally. Yet
On 30 September 2010 21:51, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
The Contributor Terms are the _standard_ agreement between contributors and
OSMF.
I can't be bothered searching for it and I'm paraphrasing, but
Frederik posted to one of these lists that it was only likely 2 or 3
On 30 September 2010 20:41, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Data that need not/should not be edited does not enhance the database, it
burdens the database. Such data should be added from the original source
during rendering.
Let's start removing all the placenames, from there we can
On 29 September 2010 22:21, Grant Slater openstreet...@firefishy.com wrote:
The legal advice is that OS OpenData _is_ compatible.
Any reason you specifically didn't mention that OS's lawyer refutes that claim?
___
legal-talk mailing list
On 30 September 2010 07:58, Paul Williams pjwde...@googlemail.com wrote:
or contributor loss), but have felt unhappy about such comments as
those quoted above that the OS data doesn't matter and so it doesn't
matter whether the licence is compatible - I and I am sure many other
people find the
On 30 September 2010 06:34, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
This is about the ODbL being adopted by others, thus showing that it is not
just OSM who believe that it is good.
What about Ed's question, regardless if the information is useful for
OSM or not, could it be imported into OSM?
You need to dial a helicopter to get you off the mountain
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1315762/White-van-man-airlifted-safety-satnav-sends-mountain.html
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
On 30 September 2010 10:16, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
I also think treating the US as though it's a single state (e.g.
comparing it to say Germany), is not all that useful.
Australia is worst, similar size, but much much much less people, and
Frederick seemed to think you could map out most
On 30 September 2010 13:28, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
- the imported data is small enough to be manually merged, but high
quality enough to make it worthwhile
I imported state roads in Qld some time ago, I selectively copied
missing roads, especially in more remote areas that
On 30 September 2010 13:58, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 11:28 PM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
IMHO imports are at the best in these cases:
- the data cannot be obtained by surveying (eg, administrative boundaries)
Wow, really? I'd say that's the worst
On 30 September 2010 14:08, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
If it doesn't need to be edited, then it shouldn't be imported.
Why not if it enhances the database?
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
You need to dial a helicopter to get you off the mountain
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1315762/White-van-man-airlifted-safety-satnav-sends-mountain.html
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
On 30 September 2010 11:58, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
A pretty similar thing happened to a friend of mine. Hired a car
overseas, set off for a drive in the country, and ended up on a
walking track that kept on getting narrower and narrower... Minus the
helicopter rescue though.
On 28 September 2010 21:03, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
The question I am asking myself is: Is the ability to import as much
government data as possible really worth the hassle? And my personal answer
is a clear no; because to me, the value of imported data is very small,
almost
On 29 September 2010 02:14, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
Most of the mappers I know are not fond of imports. You can mostly
just import data that is already available elsewhere. Data that gets
imported without a vivid community is doomed to get old and useless.
Ok, lets
On 29 September 2010 02:28, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
OK, lets not confuse issues here, one is to perform the import, the
other is maintenance and updates of the data.
How is maintenance of imported data any different than maintenance of
non-imported data?
On 29 September 2010 02:45, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
thing is if you have non-imported data, there is usually someone who
is caring for it. If you do imports, there might be someone but mostly
How many people that mapped Haiti still care for that data 6 months later?
On 29 September 2010 04:52, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
The latter is most definitely 'cared' for 'maintained'. I certainly don't
want to loose the ability to do b) nor loose existing data I've added that
way.
neither do I
Ok, I see my problem before, it was with the
On 29 September 2010 02:57, Rob Myers r...@robmyers.org wrote:
How is maintenance of imported data any different than maintenance of
non-imported data?
The feeling of ownership and investment and the number of people involved.
That's based on the premise that the person that added the data is
On 29 September 2010 03:56, Chris Hill o...@raggedred.net wrote:
So you think that only experienced OSmers add shops, churches, schools,
footpaths, cycletracks ... ?
So you think the non-experienced OSMers that added 1 or 2 POIs
actually care what they entered 6 or 12 months from now? or that
On 29 September 2010 03:35, Niklas Cholmkvist towards...@gmail.com wrote:
John Smith wrote:
I really wish someone would have the backbone to fess up and say OSM
will now go in this direction, or OSM is going in that direction,
I find that the above quoted text states that it would be better
On 29 September 2010 06:36, Rob Myers r...@robmyers.org wrote:
Given that OSM is going to be relicencing, if the OS's licence isn't
CT-compatible then the options are for the OS to relicence their data or for
that data to be excluded from OSM's database.
If the OS ODL isn't CT compatible, and
Isn't the limit per upload not per changeset?
On 9/24/10, MP singular...@gmail.com wrote:
I looked at changeset
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/5853571 and I noticed
the page says Has the following 79290 nodes: ... Has the following
15862 ways:
Isn't there supposed to be a
On 22 September 2010 17:00, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
planned license change (we don't usually go into detail unless of course
someone requests it - we just say that OSM is committed to free and open
licenses always).
Do they understand that may include no attribution in future?
On 22 September 2010 17:30, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Convincing someone to give you date is a bit like sales. We're not lying to
people but we're not trying to scare them either. We're not saying things
Actually, it's a lie of omission:
On 21 September 2010 18:38, Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com wrote:
However, if you were writing a routing program, it would be unwise to assume
that you can drive through a barrier=gate if no additional access is
specified.
Often a gate is locked shut.
You can only make that assumption for your
On 22 September 2010 02:38, Peter Wendorff wendo...@uni-paderborn.de wrote:
I would say, it's NOT an error to not map the access tags itself - sometimes
the mapper don't know this facts - as mentioned in this thread before.
But I totally agree, that it's a mandatory tag to be sure at usage, so
It doesn't seem likely things are going to be resolved to everyone's
liking, in fact there seems to be a new type of service popping up
every other week.
So to this end I just filed a bug with JOSM asking to get multiple
credentials stored and some easy way to switch between them. This is
so you
On 22 September 2010 14:16, Andrew Laughton laughton.and...@gmail.com wrote:
To me this means multiple username and password combinations, all with
the same OSM site.
I think you should spell out that we need JOSM to be able to be used
on different mapping sites.
It would also be useful for
On 22 September 2010 14:30, Andrew Laughton laughton.and...@gmail.com wrote:
http://fosm.org give instructions on how to change JOSM so that it uses FOSM.
Yes, but you loose any authentication information for OSM and vice
versa if you switch between them, that is unless you run JOSM under
On 21 September 2010 06:38, Ulf Möller o...@ulfm.de wrote:
On the other hand, if someone has two accounts, we probably can rely on the
honor system.
Currently it's being suggested that people create a second account so
they can agree to the CTs, this doesn't seem to be the sort of thing
that
On 21 September 2010 08:10, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
CTs are per account. Active Contributors are per person.
Exactly, you agree to the CTs as a person, which then encompasses all
accounts used, unless the wording of the current CTs is changed your
suggestion shouldn't be given.
On 18 September 2010 07:15, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
2) My question was about how the new license/CT is worded *now* not in the
assumptive future.
The problem is the CTs allow the potential for relicensing with a
fairly low barrier, but they don't address what happens with existing
On 17 September 2010 05:25, Grant Slater openstreet...@firefishy.com wrote:
This clashes with the legal advice giving to the Licensing Working
Group in that OS OpenData's license _is_ compatible with ODbL and the
Contributor Terms. Specifically section 4 of the Contributor Terms
provides a
On 17 September 2010 06:06, Rob Myers r...@robmyers.org wrote:
4. At Your or the copyright holder’s option, OSMF agrees to attribute You
or the copyright holder. A mechanism will be provided, currently a web page
[...]
The way that it allows attribution satisfies BY-SA 2.5+ as well as the
On 17 September 2010 06:36, Rob Myers r...@robmyers.org wrote:
If you mean the licence of OSM, that would clash with section 4 of the CTs.
In that case, Section 3 clashes with 4, since there is no minimum
requirement of attribution.
If you mean a produced work, that would clash with section
On 16 September 2010 16:11, Morten Kjeldgaard m...@bioxray.dk wrote:
What should be done in cases like this? The wiki says chill it.
The accounts are usually deleted, depending who's about depends on how
long before the account is removed.
___
talk
On 16 September 2010 18:35, Grant Slater openstreet...@firefishy.com wrote:
Point 4 of the Contributor Terms provides a guaranteed mechanism for
Attribution.
http://www.osmfoundation.org/wiki/License/Contributor_Terms
On 16 September 2010 09:35, 80n 80n...@gmail.com wrote:
Dave Hanson relicensed the TIGER data under CC-BY-SA when he contributed it
to OSM. If you received it from him you have to comply with his license
terms.
Which is no different than BSD code ending up in Linux and being
released under
On 16 September 2010 00:37, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
I believe John Smith initially suggested it to NearMap. Ben Last at NearMap
No, I posted the question publicly to the legal talk list, my concern
wasn't just about Nearmap but any source that may be too easy to
access
On 16 September 2010 00:37, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
Nestoria have launched an OSM option in Australia.
http://blog.nestoria.com.au/big-thank-you
Wonder if they'll ditch OSM when the data is reverted due to the poor
quality previously available...
On 16 September 2010 04:02, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
That said, there is no answer right now for what will happen regarding
NearMap imagery in the future. Currently, OSM users may not use
NearMap imagery for deriving data for OSM.
Only users that have agreed with the new
On 16 September 2010 04:12, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
bad. This isn't a competition with a winner and loser. The fact is
that NearMap don't want OSM users using their imagery right now. So
we shouldn't.
This isn't true, they don't want to allow their data to be submitted
under
On 16 September 2010 07:31, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
I don't think that your recommendation is in the best interest of
OpenStreetMap or OSM contributors.
You left off 3, there is going to be a fork as cc-by-sa and any such
contributions from Nearmap will be happily accepted.
Also
On 16 September 2010 07:31, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
I don't think that your recommendation is in the best interest of
OpenStreetMap or OSM contributors.
Actually how can you or anyone else make this statement in good faith
when most of the contributors have never been asked what
401 - 500 di 3639 matches
Mail list logo
