Re: [OSM-talk] bridging chatrooms

enabling IRC to telegram posts would likely also attract spammers, we have had some few spam incidents on OSM Telegram groups, but with an IRC bridge it may increase a lot... Cheers, Martin ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Talk-it] Tagging scheme alimentare

sent from a phone > On 14. Nov 2019, at 11:01, Cascafico Giovanni wrote: > > Si tratta di assegnare delle chiavi e valori ad > attività come prosciuttifici, norcini, catering e gastronomie ecc. > Molti elementi del dataset non hanno la rivendita, per cui escludo la > chiave shop. Per il

[Talk-it] Special Issue "OpenStreetMap as A Multi-Disciplinary Nexus: Perspectives, Practices and Procedures"

Ciao, scusandomi per il cross-posting, di seguito l'invito alla Special Issue su OpenStreetMap che ho organizzato insieme ai colleghi dell'Academic Track di State of the Map 2019. Un saluto a tutti, Marco Dear Colleagues, We are excited to invite you to submit

Re: [OSM-talk] Licence of Facebook's derived road datasets? ODbL?

14 Nov 2019, 21:38 by r...@technomancy.org: > Facebook provide download dumps of their machine detected roads on a > country by country basis IANAL, but as far as i know you are 100% right. Also, is their road detection powered by already mapped OSM roads? In such case it would be ODBL even

Re: [OSM-talk] Licence of Facebook's derived road datasets? ODbL?

Let me get this straight: * I create a dataset from public data sources, e.g. a list of roads, and publish it under the Public Domain dedication (i.e. CC0). (I agree that MIT is weird here). * Afterwards, I make a subset of my original data by removing any roads I found elsewhere, e.g. in a

Re: [OSM-talk] Licence of Facebook's derived road datasets? ODbL?

On Thursday 14 November 2019, Rory McCann wrote: > > That webpage says the data is MIT licenced (_data_ under MIT is odd, > but whatever). The files are zipfiles with a licence file also saying > MIT. The description is “Country exports contain only the AI > predicted roads that are missing from

[OSM-talk] Licence of Facebook's derived road datasets? ODbL?

Hello all, Facebook provide download dumps of their machine detected roads on a country by country basis¹. It's great to see direct access to this data, allowing us to look at that data without having to use a raw API. Well done Facebook. That webpage says the data is MIT licenced (_data_ under

Re: [OSM-talk] Licence of Facebook's derived road datasets? ODbL?

There seems to be a misunderstanding of the definition of "Derived". In order for something to be considered derived it needs to contain some elements from which it was derived. The end product described by facebook contains no OSM data, therefore it is literally the opposite of a derived

Re: [OSM-talk] Licence of Facebook's derived road datasets? ODbL?

I'm not an attorney, but I do have an opinion. Just because there "is no data from OSM in the dataset" does not mean they are (or aren't) derived. If OSM data were used in conjunction with its production, I think an argument can be made that those work are derived. The question would be:

Re: [OSM-talk] Licence of Facebook's derived road datasets? ODbL?

stevea, I would not be exactly the same person without OSM. Does it mean ODbL applies to me? A hammer was used to build a house, but the house does not have hammer's copyright. Just because some data was used in the process does not necessarily mean that whoever saw that data taints everything

Re: [OSM-talk] Licence of Facebook's derived road datasets? ODbL?

even if we would have a right to be quoted for the absent data, IMHO it would be silly to pursue the case. I‘d rather spend the resources on those cases where they are actually using OpenStreetMap data and not sufficiently attributing it. There’s a lot of cases, Facebook being one of them. I

Re: [OSM-talk] Licence of Facebook's derived road datasets? ODbL?

sent from a phone > On 15. Nov 2019, at 00:19, stevea wrote: > > But the "ultimate test" of "can the new work be made without OSM data?" > remains a good one, in my opinion, because then, the author can be told, > "well, then, go do so, please, otherwise offer us attribution of some sort"

Re: [OSM-talk] Licence of Facebook's derived road datasets? ODbL?

I don't know. I've expressed my opinion(s) on the matter, and believe the LWG should chime in with "an" (the?) answer. SteveA California > On Nov 14, 2019, at 3:27 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer > wrote: > sent from a phone > >> On 15. Nov 2019, at 00:19, stevea wrote: >> >> But the "ultimate

Re: [OSM-talk] Licence of Facebook's derived road datasets? ODbL?

14 Nov 2019, 22:12 by yuriastrak...@gmail.com: > Let me get this straight: > > * I create a dataset from public data sources, e.g. a list of roads, and > publish it under the Public Domain dedication (i.e. CC0).  (I agree that MIT > is weird here). > * Afterwards, I make a subset of my

Re: [OSM-talk] Licence of Facebook's derived road datasets? ODbL?

I would believe it isn’t a derived work, as there is no data from OpenStreetMap in the dataset. I agree with Mateusz, if they trained their ai with OpenStreetMap data, you could take the position that every outcome of their blackbox is OpenStreetMap-derived, but AFAIK it is a gray area. Ciao

Re: [OSM-talk] Licence of Facebook's derived road datasets? ODbL?

While exactly "the data" may not be "in" the derived work, because of the process of their creation, "their spirit" are in the derived work, as they were a part of the new data's production. That strongly seems "derived" to me, whether that "spirit" is inspirational or gives rise to "do

Re: [OSM-talk] Licence of Facebook's derived road datasets? ODbL?

sent from a phone > On 14. Nov 2019, at 23:25, stevea wrote: > > But if you DO use that "OSM over-layer," then please: agree with common > sense that those work are derived from OSM, even if they do not contain OSM > data in them. They contain data "helped" by OSM data, so they are

Re: [OSM-talk] Licence of Facebook's derived road datasets? ODbL?

Yuri, I appreciate your analogies and making the point about "derived." Yes, we are inspired by architecture we see, if we incorporate a little finial from a public building in our new roof project, do we owe the architecture money, or a nod? There are plenty of examples like this in real

Re: [Talk-it] iD editor

Il giorno mer, 13/11/2019 alle 20.42 +0100, Martin Koppenhoefer ha scritto: > > Scusate, tanto testo ;-) > > Che dite, vogliamo appoggiare l'idea? Attualmente è ancora molto > "fresco" (da modificare, è la prima bozza), ma la direzione sarà > probabilmente quella, attualmente c'è la

Re: [OSM-talk] Licence of Facebook's derived road datasets? ODbL?

Stevea, I think this discussion mixes two topics, as Martin pointed out: * I want to be credited for my work (i.e. you couldn't have done it without me, just say so) * I want to control what you do with the results of my work (i.e. you must not kill baby seals using the map I created) The first

Re: [OSM-talk] Licence of Facebook's derived road datasets? ODbL?

I suggest this is "referencing" and, while it does not mention the word, is covered in the Legal FAQ https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Licence_and_Legal_FAQ#Can_I_use_OSM_data_and_OpenStreetMap-derived_maps_to_verify_my_own_data_without_triggering_share-alike.3F I think I originally

Re: [OSM-talk] Licence of Facebook's derived road datasets? ODbL?

IMO (not yet stating the official opinion of the LWG since the LWG has not had time convene and discuss), the predicted roads are not a Derivative Database and Facebook can apply whatever license it wants to them (including MIT). It is not a case of “raw data dervived from aerial imagery, plus

[Talk-it] Tagging scheme alimentare

Ciao a tutti, dovo aver un po' rotto sul gruppo Telegram, per evitare di perdere gli apporti scrivo qua. In vista di un import relativo al comparto alimentare mi trovo davanti alle etichettature. Si tratta di assegnare delle chiavi e valori ad attività come prosciuttifici, norcini, catering e

Re: [Talk-it] iD editor

grazie Martin di averci portato a conoscenza dell'iniziativa in corso nella comunità tedesca. Spero che la facciano diventare una pagina wiki sottoposta a votazione, così da tutto il mondo possiamo sottoscrivere e commentare. Il giorno mer 13 nov 2019 alle ore 20:43 Martin Koppenhoefer <

Re: [Talk-it] iD editor

On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 8:43 PM Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > Che dite, vogliamo appoggiare l'idea? Attualmente è ancora molto "fresco" (da > modificare, è la prima bozza), ma la direzione sarà probabilmente quella, > attualmente c'è la discussione in talk-de e forum. Grazie Martin per questa

Re: [Talk-it] OSMit 2020

Ascolterei con interesse il tuo intervento! -- Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Italy-General-f5324174.html ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

[OSM-talk] bridging chatrooms

Hi, In the run-up to SotM there were some (justified) complaints that the chatroom for the event was only available using Telegram. I'm not interested in a discussion about whether this is no issue at all or rather a Big Issue. I'd rather just fix the issue, without forcing anyone to change. It

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Le filtre anti spam du wiki râle

Le 13/11/2019 à 07:36, Yves P. a écrit : est-ce vraiment utile d'ajouter un nom de domaine qui est dédié à des redirections sur une autre url : si je comprends bien le cas que tu présentes. Oui pour documenter « facilement » la clé flickr. Regarde le contenu du fichier de configuration 

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] [OverpassTurbo] Manquent terminus dans ligne de métro

marc marc wrote > il y a quoi dans searchArea ? vu que tu sélectionnes les rails de la > relation, c'est peu probablement que tu doives à nouveau vérifier leur > étendue géographique Par exemple, pour le RER A: (relation["network"="RER"]["ref"="A"];) -> .searchArea; Si un site quelque part

Re: [Talk-se] Märklig kustlinje

Uppdateringen av kustlinjen släpar efter. Jag tror det kommer lösa sig själv. Det verkar inte finnas någon way där kustlinjen nu syns. Mvh Den tors 14 nov. 2019 14:39Björn Stenberg skrev: > Hej, > > Är det någon som kan lista ut vad det är som ger Siarö en vit > bakgrund/kustlinje som inte

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] prev.openstreetmap.fr

Le 13/11/2019 à 20:36, Cédric Frayssinet a écrit : Tout l'intérêt d'avoir encore l'ancien site sous la main c'est d'y trouver des ressources qu'on ne trouve pas ailleurs. Donc ne plus l'indexer n'est pas la solution. Migrer d'abord, éteindre ensuite, ça oui. Mais c'est fastidieux, et sur ce

[Talk-se] Märklig kustlinje

Hej, Är det någon som kan lista ut vad det är som ger Siarö en vit bakgrund/kustlinje som inte syns i någon editor? Titta på Skutviken här https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/59.56153/18.67075 Den är rendrerad på en vit yta som inte finns i datat. I såväl JOSM som iD är Skutviken en vanlig

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Le filtre anti spam du wiki râle

@Vincent > Oui pour documenter « facilement » la clé flickr. …sur le wiki : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:flickr https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Key:flickr (ici où j’ai du bricoler pour mettre un lien vers https://flic.kr/p/2h8YVBv) > Regarde le contenu du fichier de

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Le filtre anti spam du wiki râle

Le 14.11.19 à 17:31, Yves P. a écrit : > j’ai du bricoler pour mettre un lien vers https://flic.kr > pour ma part je ne vois pas l'intérêt de mettre un lien redirecteur le wiki permet de raccourcir l'url si on veux l'affichage ne soie pas trop long

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Le filtre anti spam du wiki râle

> pour ma part je ne vois pas l'intérêt de mettre un lien redirecteur > le wiki permet de raccourcir l'url si on veux l'affichage ne soie pas > trop long En soit, je peux m’en passer. Le truc c’est que je veux documenter ce que les contributeurs mettent dans la base OSM. C’est mieux si ces

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] [OverpassTurbo] Manquent terminus dans ligne de métro

Le 14.11.19 à 14:41, Shohreh a écrit : > marc marc wrote >> il y a quoi dans searchArea ? vu que tu sélectionnes les rails de la >> relation, c'est peu probablement que tu doives à nouveau vérifier leur >> étendue géographique > > Par exemple, pour le RER A: > >

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] prev.openstreetmap.fr

Le 14.11.19 à 17:13, Vincent Bergeot a écrit : > disons que la première étape est sans doute de référencer ce qui doit > être migrer de prev. à l'actuel :) > 2 pistes : - utiliser un moteur de recherche pour voir ce qui est référencé sur prev.*, vérifier que ce contenu est bien présent sur

[Talk-bo] Transmisión en línea de la conferencia SOTMLatam 2019

Hola, Hay transmisión en línea de la conferencia SOTMLatam 2019 en Paraguay ↓ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L03-XwO4CT0 Desconozco si es un enlace para toda la conferencia, pero si cambia mañana la anuncio.. Abrazos, Marco Antonio ___ Talk-bo

[Talk-de] Windy Map mißachtet OSM-Lizenz?

Liebe Mapperinnen und Mapper im Nachbarland, verzeiht den crosspost von talk-at, aber das Thema braucht breitere Unterstützung. Der letzte Wochennotiz hat mich auf die Windy Map aufmerksam gemacht. Schöne Karte, zweifellos. Zumindest in meiner Gegend basiert sie mit Sicherheit auf OSM-Daten.

[talk-latam] Transmisión en línea de la conferencia SOTMLatam 2019

Hola, Hay transmisión en línea de la conferencia SOTMLatam 2019 en Paraguay ↓ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L03-XwO4CT0 Desconozco si es un enlace para toda la conferencia, pero si cambia mañana la anuncio.. Abrazos, Marco Antonio ___ talk-latam

Re: [Talk-de] Windy Map mißachtet OSM-Lizenz?

auf dem Telefon ist m.E. nichtmal die winzige Attribution, gar nicht. M.E. ein Fall für die OpenStreetMap-Foundation, da kommerzieller Anbieter. Hast Du sie mal kontaktiert? Gruß Martin ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org

[Talk-ee] SoTM Baltics 2020

Hi, dear Estonian OSM community. On 2020-03-06 there will be a Baltcic GIT/GIS conference in Riga with a dedicated OSM track. We're using the opportunity and turning it into *drumroll* SoTM Baltics :) You are very welcome to attend, and we are also looking for: * Speakers That is You. Got

Re: [Talk-de] Windy Map mißachtet OSM-Lizenz?

Guten Abend, ja... Jeder dürfte seinen Honeypot in seiner Gegend haben... Ich erkenne in meinem heimatlichen Spreewald genau, was OSM ist... Und ja, es ist OSM und ja, es fehlt der Lizenzhinweis... Du kannst ja mal einen freudlichen Hinweis senden, mit dem Verweis darauf, daß ein Hinweis

Re: [Talk-de] Windy Map mißachtet OSM-Lizenz?

sent from a phone > On 14. Nov 2019, at 18:50, Robert Grübler wrote: > > Basiert die Karte in eurer Gegend auch auf OSM? ja, in Rom ist es auch definitiv OpenStreetMap, wie Du schon schreibst, sie „attributieren“ es ja auch, wenn auch nicht wahrnehmbar, und osm antatt OpenStreetMap ist

Re: [Talk-de] Windy Map mißachtet OSM-Lizenz?

Am 14. November 2019 21:08 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer [mailto:dieterdre...@gmail.com] < M.E. ein Fall für die OpenStreetMap-Foundation, da kommerzieller Anbieter. Hast Du sie mal kontaktiert? Die OSMF? Nein - die jüngste Diskussion zwischen Nuno Caldeira und OSMF war zu abschreckend. LG

Re: [Talk-de] Windy Map mißachtet OSM-Lizenz?

Am : Donnerstag, 14. November 2019 23:09 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer [mailto:dieterdre...@gmail.com] < Ich meinte ob Du Windy kontaktiert hast, < vielleicht haben sie das mit der Lizenz ja nur übersehen o_O Am Donnerstag, 14. November 2019 22:23 schrieb streckenkundler

Re: [Talk-de] Windy Map mißachtet OSM-Lizenz?

sent from a phone > On 15. Nov 2019, at 00:16, Robert Grübler wrote: > > Since you have been informed about lapses in this since 2016, > yourselves. Das läuft schon seit 2016 so? Mit DCMA ist es eine Sache von wenigen Tagen oder gar Stunden. Gruß Martin

Re: [Talk-africa] Fix road problems around Africa with MapRoulette: Angola, Egypt, Kenya, Rwanda, South Africa, Tunisia & Uganda

Hi everyone, I created a new one related to protected areas — such as national parks, protected forests, marine protected areas and so on. Take a look • Fixing protected area tagging in Africa: https://maproulette.org/browse/challenges/10847 Thanks, Andrew Andrew Wiseman |  Maps |

Re: [Talk-de] Windy Map mißachtet OSM-Lizenz?

Am 15. November 2019 00:22 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer [mailto:dieterdre...@gmail.com] < < Das läuft schon seit 2016 so? https://community.windy.com/topic/3353/map-correction/11 mitteilen? LG Robert ___ Talk-de mailing list

Re: [Talk-de] Windy Map mißachtet OSM-Lizenz?

sent from a phone > On 14. Nov 2019, at 21:23, Robert Grübler wrote: > > Hast Du sie mal kontaktiert? > > Die OSMF? Nein - die jüngste Diskussion zwischen Nuno Caldeira und OSMF war > zu abschreckend. Ich meinte ob Du Windy kontaktiert hast, vielleicht haben sie das mit der Lizenz ja nur

[OSM-talk-fr] Validateur JOSM : "Valeur de la propriété inconnue"

Bonjour, Je n’arrive pas à trouver le validateur de JOSM pour faire un ticket approprié. (vivement Github ou Gitlab ) Il trouve des tags "man_made=grave" et suggère que la valeur serait « crane » D’après le wiki, c’est "cemetery=grave ». Il y en a 418

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Affiner la sortie de mes requêtes Overpass

Salut Le 14/11/2019 à 08:35, Jean-Christophe Becquet a écrit : http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/O4N Non, ou alors c'est moi qui m'y prend mal. Lorsque j'exécute cette requête dans QuickOSM, je récupère 3 couches dans QGIS : - une couche avec les ways - une couche avec les points - une couche

[Talk-hr] Upis podataka iz ZET-ovog GTFS-a u OSM

Pozdrav! GTFS (General Transit Feed Specification) je otvoreni standard za opis podataka pojedinog javnog prijevoznika. Unutra su opisane sve stanice, rute, vremena kretanja, itd.. Našao sam da je ZET objavio svoj GTFS, ovdje: http://www.zet.hr/odredbe/datoteke-u-gtfs-formatu/669 Ono što tu ima

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Affiner la sortie de mes requêtes Overpass

Le jeu. 14 nov. 2019 à 08:36, Jean-Christophe Becquet a écrit : > - une couche avec une seule géométrie qui couvre tous le parcours de > l'itinéraire > > C'est cette dernière que je voudrais récupérer dans uMap. C'est à dire > que lorsque j'importe l'itinéraire, il crée une seule ligne dans mon

Re: [Talk-hr] Upis podataka iz ZET-ovog GTFS-a u OSM

On Thu, 14 Nov 2019, at 10:39, Janko Mihelić wrote: > GTFS (General Transit Feed Specification) je otvoreni standard za opis > podataka pojedinog javnog prijevoznika. Unutra su opisane sve stanice, > rute, vremena kretanja, itd. Primjetio sam da ovo postoji i super da postoji. :) Nažalost za

Re: [Talk-GB] Tagging Mill Races / Leats / Lades

Looking at the existing guidelines it would be waterway=canal and canal=headrace (canal here used in the power rather than transport context) If this is indeed correct then it's not very obvious but it is detailed here:

Re: [Talk-es] Mapeo de espacios protegidos

Olivier, Está también la lista de patrimonio mundial de la UNESCO [1] que supongo que en su mayor parte estarán subidos, pero hay elementos que son multilocales, algunas con hasta 758 sitios [2], que no es por criticar a la UNESCO pero algunos tienen las coordenadas mal, difícil tarea. Además

Re: [Talk-GB] Tagging Mill Races / Leats / Lades

"Canal" should surely be restricted to transport functions? Boating apps presumably treat "canal" as a route unless navigation restrictions are added. If the stuff that is moving is the water rather than the boats, "aqueduct" would be the correct term. cheers, Martin.

Re: [Talk-es] Mapeo de espacios protegidos

Buenos días, Estoy un poco pesimista respecto a la prosperidad de este tema. Efectivamente es lo que siento después de ver la complejidad de la realidad, la complejidad de la transcripción al mapa y lo poco de respuesta que ha recibido mi mensaje que supongo traducirá el poco de entusiasmo que

Re: [Talk-hr] Upis podataka iz ZET-ovog GTFS-a u OSM

čet, 14. stu 2019. u 11:03 Ivan Habunek napisao je: > Nažalost za svaku stanicu imaju samo jednu lokaciju, čak i kad su pozicije > stajališta u raznim smjerovima dosta udaljenje. Imaš pravo. Zato Google Maps ima na svojoj karti samo po jednu stanicu za svaku od ovih. Pitanje je ima li smisla

Re: [Talk-se] Många nya öppna data från naturvårdsverket

Hej Henrik On 2019-11-11 09:09, Henrik Larsson wrote: Alla data är inte CC0 men kartdata verkar vara det. Se http://www.naturvardsverket.se/upload/miljoarbete-i-samhallet/uppdelat-efter-omrade/oppna-data/policy-naturvardsverkets-datainformation-2017-06-08.pdf för detaljer. Alla geodata och

[Talk-GB] Tagging Mill Races / Leats / Lades

Hi Can find no guidance on the Wiki about tagging mill races. I come across these continually while surveying. They are a totally distinctive water feature which don't bear much relation to listed waterway types. Drain seems to be the closes value - but this really misrepresents their

Re: [Talk-GB] Tagging Mill Races / Leats / Lades

I think instead of canal=headrace you meant to write usage=headrace? That's what's in the wiki, and also 1000+ entries seen in taginfo. I've chatted many times to people about millraces, but the term "headrace" (and "tailrace") is new to me. I'll add keywords to the wiki to make searching easier.

Re: [Talk-GB] Tagging Mill Races / Leats / Lades

I pieced it together as best I could and came up with that, which reminds me that we need much better (UK-specific) tagging information on the Wiki. Nothing stopping anyone rolling their own tags though. I'd have gone for man_made=leat which has some small precedent. Regards, *Paul* On Thu, 14

Re: [Talk-GB] Tagging Mill Races / Leats / Lades

Per the wiki "Use waterway=canal for man-made open flow (free flow vs pipe flow) waterways used to carry useful water for transportation, hydro-power generation OR irrigation purposes." E.g. there are a range of purposes for which waterway=canal is used. The access tags could be used to make

Re: [Talk-GB] Tagging Mill Races / Leats / Lades

On 2019-11-14 13:22, Martin Wynne wrote: > "Canal" should surely be restricted to transport functions? Boating apps > presumably treat "canal" as a route unless navigation restrictions are added. Canal indicates a form of construction - man-made. Unlike natural watercourses they were

Re: [Talk-GB] Tagging Mill Races / Leats / Lades

On 14/11/2019 12:31, Ken Kilfedder wrote: Per the wiki "Use waterway=canal for man-made open flow (free flow vs pipe flow) waterways used to carry useful water for transportation, hydro-power generation OR irrigation purposes." E.g. there are a range of purposes for which waterway=canal is

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] [OverpassTurbo] Manquent terminus dans ligne de métro

Nicolas Bétheuil-2 wrote > En gros pour faire vite, il y a une nomenclature hiérarchisé : > - les routes master représente la ligne > - Qui ont des relations vers les routes, chaque sens > - qui contient des points, le dessin de la ligne, les stations etc ... > > La route master n’a pas de

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] [OverpassTurbo] Manquent terminus dans ligne de métro

Le 14.11.19 à 14:00, Shohreh a écrit : > Nicolas Bétheuil-2 wrote > Comme la question des "bouts de ways qui dépassent des terminus" se pose > souvent, y a-t-il une syntaxe plus smart que les matryoshkas pour les > supprimer toutes d'un coup ? pour les chemins de fer, il y un tag pour dire si

[OSM-ja] 12/14 京都！街歩き！マッピングパーティ：第15回 南禅寺

京都！街歩き！マッピングパーティ世話役の山下です。 皆さんこんにちわ。 京都を街歩きして、楽しみながら 自由な地図である OpenStreetMap を創り上げていくマッピングパーティ！ 12 月の京都！街歩き！マッピングパーティは、 絶景かな！で有名な三門のある京都五山 別格 南禅寺 イベントの詳細と参加申し込みは connpass にて https://openstreetmap-kyoto.connpass.com/event/11/ 皆様の参加をお待ちしています！ -- 山下康成＠京都府向日市