Actually – maybe it did!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5PcmFQUWZuM
I will add the strip!
From: Phil Wyatt via Talk-au
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2024 8:38 PM
To: 'Ewen Hill'
Cc: talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [talk-au] farm airstrips
The Grand Design House
The Grand Design House is not in that location – its here. As Ewen indicated it
didn’t actually go ahead as a runway.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=18/-38.40343/145.31695
From: Ewen Hill
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2024 7:46 PM
To: Phil Wyatt
Cc: Andrew Welch ; talk-au
May have been an eager mapper after this incident but certainly no sign of a
formal or informal strip there
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/plane-flips-after-landing-gear-malfunctions-on-victorias-french-island/video/f61a249832fb86f3fad6be0aa92c3ce6
From: Andrew Welch via Talk-au
I have also contacted Stephen privately to see if he wants to chat
Cheers - Phil
From: Graeme Fitzpatrick
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2024 5:54 PM
To: Andrew Welch
Cc: Mark Pulley ; OpenStreetMap-AU Mailing List
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Deletion of informal paths by NSW NPWS
NPWS
Lots of the detail is there already
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Cycling_and_Foot_Paths
Never know, they might even get to like mapping and start adding lots more
detail like “operator” to existing tacks and notes to those under rehabilitation
Hi Folks,
Personally I think its best if they do become editors as well as
mailing/forum/discord participants. It's the best way to learn the ecosystem
and I have no doubt that their data group will have some GIS knowledge etc
so it wont be too onerous on them to participate.
The difficulty is
Personally I think it should be suburb and postcode (drop the country)
From: Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, October 16, 2023 5:53 PM
To: Graeme Fitzpatrick ; Yuchen Pei
Cc: talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [talk-au] How to efficiently improve AU address coverage?
On
Hi Bob,
Is there any reason why you cant just export to GPX from overpass and then
drag and drop the GPX file into ID (edit mode) for all the locations ?
Repeat the process after you have done some edits and you will get the
remaining unedited locations.
Cheers - Phil
-Original
Hi Yuchen,
For me it's a lack of programming skills. In some other cases its lack of
open data for the addresses. There is also a requirement for good
documentation and community support for any imports.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import
We have open data for some states
Hi Folks,
Personally, I believe if the managing agency requests that the tracks be
removed from the map then as good corporate citizens we should do everything
possible to lower the promotion of such tracks. Track managers also have a
responsibility to also actively advise people and if the
Hi Folks,
Does anyone know the frequency of updates for OSRM? It doesn't look to have
been updated in a while? If there is an issue is there a dashboard somewhere
that tells of its status?
>> OSRM hasn't updated since 2023-07-09T04:00:00Z
http://map.project-osrm.org/timestamps/
Cheers
This end has an issue if you can legally go round the Menang Drive loop
https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_car=-34.9
6706%2C117.81758%3B-34.96606%2C117.82303#map=18/-34.96639/117.82031
-Original Message-
From: Ian Steer
Sent: Wednesday, June 7, 2023 7:44 PM
Hi Ian,
I cant actually find a FULL policy in NSW
https://www.planning.nsw.gov.au/policy-and-legislation/aboriginal-land-use-planning/nsw-dual-naming-policy
https://www.gnb.nsw.gov.au/aboriginal_place_naming/dual_naming
However sixmaps does find indigenous names and seems to use the
Hi Folks,
In Tasmania I have started to use the following for dual named locations
name=kunanyi / Mount Wellington
name:en=Mount Wellington
name:xtz=kunanyi
where xtz is the language code for the indigenous language of the area
Many thanks for this Andrew,
Not being a coder, I asked ChatGPT if it could convert this to output the
geometry (so I could pull it into ID editor easily via gpx) and it responded
with this...
[out:json][timeout:900];
area["ISO3166-2"="AU-VIC"]->.a;
relation["type"="waterway"](area.a);
foreach
Hi Little Maps,
One simple way would be just to look at the members in a relation
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2181945#map=9/-36.4017/146.8309
but I assume you want to do this on a much larger scale?
What have you tried so far and what were the results?
Cheers - Phil
-Original
the more relevant ones on the wiki.
Cheers – Phil (on behalf of all the lobbyists!)
From: Ewen Hill
Sent: Friday, May 5, 2023 4:34 PM
To: Phil Wyatt
Cc: talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Tasmania Spatial Data
Superb work again Phil, one dataset at a time, you are slowly making
Hi Folks,
Just a heads up that we have recently obtained a waiver for a limited subset
of data from the LIST Open Data portal
(https://listdata.thelist.tas.gov.au/opendata/). Data for which Land
Tasmania is the custodian is now available for use in OpenStreetMap (waiver
Hi Andrew,
One way would be by using a ref key https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ref
Maybe even something as long as
ref:AU:VIC:DOT:SN=2252 or maybe
ref:AU:VIC:DOT=SN2252
On the culvert makes sense to me but given you seem to want it related to the
way I will let others
Hi Rob,Given you are in Australia I would try the talk AU list as well. Maybe also the discord channels as there are a few Ozzie folks there in the Oceania channel with lots of transport experience. Cheers - Phil(On the phone so apologies for any typos)On 28 Sep 2022, at 6:36 pm, rob potter
I have just done Hobarts ‘Southern Outlet” as an example (and Mapillary
available at this location)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=19/-42.91186/147.30856
From: Bob Cameron
Sent: Sunday, 22 January 2023 4:09 PM
To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Tagging Trucks
Hi Folks,
I think I have seen something whereby you can use the designations on this page
(ie R6-22) for the actual signs but I could be completely wrong! May have been
used in ref tagging?? I think it was in NSW somewhere.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Road_signs_in_Australia
Cheers
For multiple chargers you could use a 'named' area rather than individual
chargers. The individual chargers could also be points with details on
output etc, especially if they differ
Cheers - Phil
-Original Message-
From: Ian Steer
Sent: Monday, 26 December 2022 9:56 AM
To:
Friday, 16 December 2022 1:33 PM
To: Sebastian S.
Cc: Phil Wyatt ; talk-au@openstreetmap.org; Warin
<61sundow...@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [talk-au] 'Named' EV chargers
I think it's reasonable for it to have a name like "Tesla Supercharger
Hollydene, NSW". If Tesla refers to it
there -
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7814409569/
Cheers - Phil
From: Sebastian S.
Sent: Thursday, 15 December 2022 11:56 PM
To: Phil Wyatt ; talk-au@openstreetmap.org; 'Warin'
<61sundow...@gmail.com>
Subject: RE: [talk-au] 'Named' EV chargers
Hi Phil,
I think you are g
ations that in my view warrant a name. Mainly because the are or
will be key stopover points that people will navigate to.
But I'm also of the opinion that the name of the Woolworths in Dee Why is '
Woolworths Dee Why '
Seb
On 15 December 2022 8:23:19 pm AEDT, Phil Wyatt mailto:p...@wyatt-fami
Then add tags for brand/operator/ref/*.
- Ben.
On Thu, 15 Dec 2022 at 14:24, Phil Wyatt mailto:p...@wyatt-family.com> > wrote:
Hi Folks,
Thoughts on 'named' EV chargers? Around 50% of chargers in Oz have some 'name'.
Most look to be adding the either the location
Hi Folks,
Thoughts on 'named' EV chargers? Around 50% of chargers in Oz have some
'name'.
Most look to be adding the either the location or name of the operator etc
(ie Freds Shop, XYZ carpark, Tesla supercharger etc), I suspect so it gets
rendered on the map.
Are folks happy if I
3:37 PM
To: Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com>
Cc: Phil Wyatt ; OSM Australian Talk List
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Changing building levels elevator to description
elevator shell
Hi Warin,
Apologies for not getting back to you and acting on this.
We will revisit all these locations and
Hi Warin,
Both of those examples were previously build:part=elevator. Its probably
worth asking why they changed them to building:levels=elevator. That seems
to be a more appropriate tagging.
Cheers - Phil
-Original Message-
From: Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, 23 October
Hi Graeme,
I reckon the vast majority of the ‘sheds’ are currently tagged
building=fire_station.
I think I will start in Tassie, as I have been to many of the stations, and see
what else crops before moving to any other states.
Thanks for all the thoughts folks
Cheers - Phil
+1100
From: "Phil Wyatt" mailto:p...@wyatt-family.com> >
To: "OSM-Au" mailto:talk-au@openstreetmap.org> >
Subject: [talk-au] Next tagging clean up project
Message-ID: <000401d8dbbe$f3cbf990$db63ecb0$@wyatt-family.com
<mailto:000401d8dbbe$f3cbf990$db63ecb0$@
Hi Folks,
Its also worth looking at planning documents that highlight the “shared trails”
and ‘key pedestrian circulation” areas as well as ‘On Road cycle lanes”
https://vpa-web.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Botanic-Ridge-Precinct-Structure-Plan-updated-May-2017.pdf
Hi Sebastian,
In the case you have highlighted, it looks to me that through that subdivision
there is a wide path in some areas and a narrow path in others (Maxaar
Imagery). That would seem to denote to me that the wider one is a shared
path/cycleway. That also seems to match with the
Hi Folks,
I am looking for my next tagging clean-up project and wondered about amenity
and building tags for fire stations
amenity=fire_station -
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dfire_station -
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1mAq
building=fire_station -
Here is a better option for overpass
It will find those A roads where the network tag doesn’t start with AU:
[out:xml][timeout:25];
{{geocodeArea:South Australia}}->.searchArea;
(
Hi Dian,
I have done all the route relations for the A, B and C roads in Tassie and
added the network=AU:TAS. I wasn’t aware that it was also needed on the
individual ways?? I understand they have the corresponding ref tag (A1, B22
etc) but is there a need for the network tag on all the
Hi Rob,Given you are in Australia I would try the talk AU list as well. Maybe also the discord channels as there are a few Ozzie folks there in the Oceania channel with lots of transport experience. Cheers - Phil(On the phone so apologies for any typos)On 28 Sep 2022, at 6:36 pm, rob potter
Thanks Andrew,
That's a great resource - someone should show that to Googlemaps! They have
hundreds of 'lakes' in Tassie that don't exist.
https://www.google.com/maps/@-43.4647476,146.1809558,15z
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Davidson
Sent: Friday, 23 September 2022 7:36 PM
To:
Hi Warin,
I have been doing much the same as part of the land use=reservoir cleanup. I
suspect some of it got added when some imagery appeared showing “a flood year”
when in reality most folks would know that is not the norm. Often, switching
imagery will show the real “normal”.
Cheers -
Personally, I would just do the 6 as the others are redundant
From: Graeme Fitzpatrick
Sent: Thursday, 22 September 2022 3:47 PM
To: OSM-Au
Subject: [talk-au] "Wrong" phone numbers
Just fixing a Note, & the company's phone number is listed on their website as
1300 xx xx, as they
Hi Folks,
I suspect most agencies run the ESRI suite of products in the background for
all their GIS and incident mapping and they may port data or maps to other apps
(maybe in realtime or daily, weekly or at least seasonally). Collector is an
ESRI app for collecting field data which is
Welcome aboard Will,
There is no shortage of tasks to make a better Australian map in OSM. There
are plenty of map roulette challenges for updating addresses, fixing
deprecated tagging on features and fixing road tagging to name just a few.
https://maproulette.org/dashboard/
The
Well done Alex,
Events such as that are a great opportunity to chat to folks about opening
up their data so we can have complete coverage. I notice that many of the
Police Station points (especially remote ones) are missing in OSM but it
also looks like some of their pins could also be
Hi Folks,
It might also be good to see how current surf sites rate and classify breaks
and try and incorporate common language in the tagging
https://www.wannasurf.com/spot/Australia_Pacific/Australia/TAS/Hobart/index.html
They have been requested at least once before. I have just sent another
email
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lacking_proper_attribution
-Original Message-
From: Paul Norman via Talk-au
Sent: Sunday, 14 August 2022 8:47 PM
To: Bob Cameron ; OSM Australian Talk List
Subject: Re:
I also looked at this briefly in Tasmania but couldn't see a lot of
consistent use
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:network
This also suggests that maybe the networks should also be country and state
based, especially if different signage is used per state ( I also think that
is how the
They look fine – I have also done one set as ways which is the other alternative
https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=20/-26.55069/151.83033
Cheers - Phil
From: Graeme Fitzpatrick
Sent: Thursday, 11 August 2022 11:08 AM
To: Ewen Hill
Cc: OSM-Au
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Tagging
In some locations a number such as ‘511/240-250 Example Street’ also indicates
that the unit 511 is on the 5th floor
From: Andrew Harvey
Sent: Wednesday, 13 July 2022 12:17 PM
To: Graeme Fitzpatrick
Cc: talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Is addr:housenumber=2/20 likely to be
Hi Folks,
This is probably the best reference for the AWTGS
https://www.ffm.vic.gov.au/recreational-activities/walking-and-camping/australian-walking-track-grading-system
Cheers - Phil
-Original Message-
From: Kim Oldfield via Talk-au
Sent: Tuesday, 28 June 2022 8:21 PM
To: Dian
Anthony,
I would suggest stopping the personal attacks on the email list and
concentrating on the actual issues, specifically in changeset comments with
the actual issue discussed. Expend your energy on the actual edits.
Cheers - Phil
From: Anthony Panozzo
Sent: Tuesday, 3 May
From: Phil Wyatt
Sent: Saturday, 30 April 2022 2:00 PM
To: 'Anthony Panozzo'
Subject: RE: [talk-au] Talk-au Digest, Vol 178, Issue 44
Hi Anthony,
There are multiple tools out there for finding 'errors' in OSM data and many
people use them to keep the OSM data up to date. You might
Many thanks for the detailed explanation
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Davidson
Sent: Saturday, 30 April 2022 11:54 AM
To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [talk-au] iD and turn restrictions (Was:Re: Talk-au Digest, Vol 178,
Issue 44)
On 30/4/22 00:45, Anthony Panozzo wrote:
>
Hi Anthony (slice0),
Can I suggest the best way to get some resolution is to actually spell out
in a changeset comment why you think the change made by Swavu is incorrect.
That way everyone gets to learn from 'conflicts'. I also suggest you
restrain your language or you may also face the wrath
Completed Australia wide
Cheers - Phil
-Original Message-
From: Bob Cameron
Sent: Wednesday, 27 April 2022 6:25 PM
To: Phil Wyatt ; 'OSM Australian Talk List'
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Country homesteads?
Hi Phil
Well they are all scattered plus/minus the road I travelled/captured
Hi Bob,
I have changed all the South Australian locations for you. I checked a few
random locations and they all looked to be placed within a farm type cluster
of buildings.
If anyone spots any problems - let me know. I will move to other states in
the next few days
https://github-wiki-see.page/m/mapbox/osmcha-frontend/wiki/Mapping-Teams
From: Andrew Hughes
Sent: Tuesday, 26 April 2022 4:45 PM
To: OSM Australian Talk List
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Creating a Mapping Team?
Hi Andrew,
I don't know the terminology so this might be annoying sorry.
2022 6:57 PM
To: Phil Wyatt ; talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Map Note Flood
On 04/04/2022 09:41, Phil Wyatt wrote:
Hi Andy,
I am aware of the volunteers doing this great work. My concern was that I had
not received a confirmation that the email had been received
in a few days. I'm aware that there are "note cleanup" projects going on in
Australia and elsewhere, so hopefully any stragglers will also get dealt with.
Best Regards,
Andy
On 04/04/2022 04:28, Phil Wyatt wrote:
Another 60 changesets this morning!
Is there any other way to aler
Another 60 changesets this morning!
Is there any other way to alert the Data working group? I suspect there will be
over 400 changesets to revert and they will get harder the longer he adds data.
Cheers
From: Phil Wyatt
Sent: Monday, 4 April 2022 10:29 AM
To: 'Graeme Fitzpatrick
- Phil
From: Phil Wyatt
Sent: Sunday, 3 April 2022 12:32 PM
To: 'Graeme Fitzpatrick' ; 'Andrew Davidson'
; 'OSM - Andrew Harvey'
Cc: 'OpenStreetMap'
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Map Note Flood
Hi Folks,
He is back at it in Australia, mainly in aboriginal communities – adding street
Hi Folks,
He is back at it in Australia, mainly in aboriginal communities – adding street
names and population and still no response for any changeset comments.
I am collecting all the changeset numbers but no response from the data working
group as yet
Cheers - Phil
From: Graeme
I have sent an email to DWG
It’s the phantom Note poster from yesterday
From: Graeme Fitzpatrick
Sent: Saturday, 2 April 2022 4:52 PM
To: Andrew Davidson ; OSM - Andrew Harvey
Cc: OpenStreetMap
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Map Note Flood
Looks like we have somebody playing games?
Hi Graeme,
It appears that there is no cycle route relation attached to the street in
question.
https://www.opencyclemap.org/docs/
Maybe ask the person to add the required route (if known)
Cheers - Phil
From: Graeme Fitzpatrick
Sent: Tuesday, 15 March 2022 11:52 AM
To:
I think when floatplanes are in the water the are considered as vessels so
where they ‘park’ would just be a pier.
Where the booking office for flights are located they could be shop=ticket or
tourism=attraction (maybe) …
and there is also landuse=port/industrial=port/port=seaplane
This might help for a start via overpass
[out:json][timeout:25];
(
nwr["fixme"](user:"aaronsta")({{bbox}});
);
out meta;
>;
out skel qt;
From: Graeme Fitzpatrick
Sent: Friday, 4 March 2022 11:09 AM
To: OSM-Au
Subject: [talk-au] Mass fix-me's with very strange comments
Fixing
https://fuelprice.io/ has just been fixed
-Original Message-
From: Stéphane Guillou via Talk-au
Sent: Thursday, 24 February 2022 2:33 PM
To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Cc: Stéphane Guillou
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Licence mention for static mapon NiceLocal.com.au
Thanks Ben.
In my
In that instance, as its using Mapbox, you can also advise Mapbox at the
contact form at the bottom of this page.
They will also contact the people and make sure it gets the correct attribution.
https://docs.mapbox.com/help/getting-started/attribution/#reporting-attribution-problems
Cheers -
Many thanks for doing this update
Cheers - Phil
-Original Message-
From: tabjsina
Sent: Tuesday, 22 February 2022 11:26 PM
To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Consistent addr:state format?
So all of Australia with the exception of Victoria is now fixed to use
I am happy to send an email to DWG with an overview of concerns. Maybe other
folks can gather a listing of any desired changesets for reversion and if all
or just some wiki edits should be reverted.
-Original Message-
From: osm.talk...@thorsten.engler.id.au
Sent: Sunday, 13 February
, 11 February 2022 12:16 AM
To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Aust. Walking Track Grading System (AWTGS)
Message: 2
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 10:26:38 +1100
From: "Phil Wyatt" mailto:p...@wyatt-family.com> >
To: mailto:talk-au@openstreetmap.org> >
Subje
Mmm, given the amount of bike edits they may be another wandrer.Earth user
trying to game the system
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/116654835#map=12/-31.9131/115.8548
From: Phil Wyatt
Sent: Thursday, 10 February 2022 6:23 PM
To: osm.talk...@thorsten.engler.id.au; 'OSM-Au
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/aaronsta/history#map=3/-17.14/139.83
… would be my best guess, Certainly a few strange changeset comments there.
Cheers - Phil
From: osm.talk...@thorsten.engler.id.au
Sent: Thursday, 10 February 2022 5:11 PM
To: 'OSM-Au'
Subject: Re: [talk-au]
Hi Folks,
Thanks for the great discussion on this issue. I have tried to summarise the
discussion and it seems like there is some consensus around the following
tagging
hiking_scale:awtgs= as the general tag for the grade of the WHOLE track as that
is what is detailed in the AWTGS
Hi Graeme,
That’s correct – however the defaults can be set on very specific tags
(def:highway=footway;access:bicycle=no) and if absolutely necessary even down
to within a single park/reserve/area/track rather than a blanket ruling. It
would get very fiddly at that degree of detail.
(b) is basically following the defaults proposal exactly, and allows to define
the defaults once and the re-use them for all national parks.
Cheers,
Thorsten
From: Phil Wyatt < <mailto:p...@wyatt-family.com> p...@wyatt-family.com>
Sent: Thursday, 3 February 2022 18:38
To:
To: Phil Wyatt ; OSM-Au
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Path versus Footway
Hi all, thanks for a really informative discussion. I’m puzzled by the comments
I’ve copied below. I’m uncertain when legislative defaults apply (and hence
explicit access tagging isn’t required) and when tagging is needed
s://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2316741>
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2316741
"def:highway=footway;access:bicycle"=no
ACT: <https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2354197>
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2354197
"def:highway=footway;access:bicycle&
to reflect whatever you want.
From: Graeme Fitzpatrick mailto:graemefi...@gmail.com>
>
Sent: Wednesday, 2 February 2022 17:32
To: Phil Wyatt mailto:p...@wyatt-family.com> >
Cc: osm.talk...@thorsten.engler.id.au
<mailto:osm.talk...@thorsten.engler.id.au> ; OSM-Au mailto:talk-au
So how do YOU decide which to use when the track is for ‘exclusively for foot
traffic’ or do you just mix it up on a whim, change each week, go with whatever
is similar around the object you are mapping?
Cheers - Phil
From: osm.talk...@thorsten.engler.id.au
Sent: Wednesday, 2 February
topic...
cheers
Tom
Canyoning? try http://ozultimate.com/canyoning Bushwalking? try
http://bushwalkingnsw.com
On 2/02/2022 11:59 am, Phil Wyatt wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
>
>
> I am contemplating a review of 'walking tracks' tagging in Tasmania,
> outside of urban areas
Probably worth starting a routing thread rather than merge with a specific
questions on foot traffic only thread
Cheers - Phil
From: Graeme Fitzpatrick
Sent: Wednesday, 2 February 2022 6:29 PM
To: osm.talk...@thorsten.engler.id.au
Cc: OSM-Au
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Path versus Footway
Hi Folks,
I am contemplating a review of 'walking tracks' tagging in Tasmania,
outside of urban areas. In my case I am starting with tracks that are
exclusively for foot traffic. My investigation has led me to what appears to
be a conflict within OSM of what is the correct tagging to use.
Hi Folks,
I think Class 1 specifically mentions disability access so I would hate to see
that combined in any way with other classes.
Cheers - Phil
From: Graeme Fitzpatrick
Sent: Monday, 31 January 2022 2:23 PM
To: ianst...@iinet.net.au
Cc: OSM-Au
Subject: Re: [talk-au] sac_scale
Thanks Folks,
For me its also about correcting invalid information that is currently in OSM.
I have found cases where the suburb has been entered as a city, the city as a
suburb, the state as a province, AU as the state etc. I suspect there may be an
app or two that may not place the
Hi Folks,
I am just checking addresses in Tasmania and have found many with addr:city
versus the correct addr:suburb. I suspect this is from early ID editor prior
to defining AU settings on address values. Is it OK to do suburb by suburb
bulk edits of this key? Tasmania only has a few cities
Was that a point or an area Graeme?
From: Graeme Fitzpatrick
Sent: Sunday, 30 January 2022 4:49 PM
To: Phil Wyatt
Cc: OSM-Au
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Water tanks as buildings?
On Sun, 30 Jan 2022 at 15:15, Phil Wyatt mailto:p...@wyatt-family.com> > wrote:
That’s the standard t
…and rather ironically, Emergency Water Tank does not have the building tag
content=water
emergency=water_tank
man_made=storage_tank
Cheers - Phil
From: Phil Wyatt
Sent: Sunday, 30 January 2022 4:15 PM
To: 'Graeme Fitzpatrick' ; 'OSM-Au'
Subject: Re: [talk
Hi Folks,
That’s the standard tagging for a water tank in ID editor. The project was a
SSSI project in Australia. They had access to high res imagery for the project.
building=yes
content=water
man_made=storage_tank
There will be 1,000’s of them across the globe I suspect
Hi Folks,
The main reason I have used capitals in the state is because of Address
Presentation Standards with Australia Post
https://auspost.com.au/content/dam/auspost_corp/media/documents/australia-post-addressing-standards-1999.pdf
Having said that, I don’t use capitals for suburbs!
Hi Justin,
I am all for standardisation, especially as many folks copy what they see on
other objects so if there is a consistent approach they learn much quicker.
I say, go for it!
Cheers - Phil
-Original Message-
From: tabjsina
Sent: Saturday, 29 January 2022 11:56 PM
To:
Hi Graeme,
The two systems are not 100% directly relatable because they are designed for
very different purposes. One is essentially for promotional purposes and the
other has legal ramifications for safety, infrastructure construction. Only two
aspects of the standard are benchmarked to
It certainly differs greatly in metropolitan areas – try using ‘Greater Hobart’
as the search criteria. Seems like most folks change to path if it in a ‘park’
of some sort and use ‘footway’ in the streets
From: Andrew Harvey
Sent: Friday, 28 January 2022 10:25 AM
To: Phil Wyatt
Cc: Tony
Try this query - it will work on any area (by bounding box) and also
includes cycleways
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1fvX
-Original Message-
From: fors...@ozonline.com.au
Sent: Friday, 28 January 2022 8:26 AM
To: Graeme Fitzpatrick
Cc: Phil Wyatt ; talk OSM Australian List
Subject: Re
January 2022 8:22 AM
To: Phil Wyatt
Cc: fors...@ozonline.com.au; talk OSM Australian List
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Deletion of walking tracks/paths
On Thu, 27 Jan 2022 at 21:35, Phil Wyatt mailto:p...@wyatt-family.com> > wrote:
Overpass query for Cradle Mountain National Park
It al
Yep, its tough sometimes to get definitive answers to tagging issues when
sometimes there are multiple tags that mean the same thing
-Original Message-
From: fors...@ozonline.com.au
Sent: Thursday, 27 January 2022 11:33 PM
To: Phil Wyatt
Cc: 'Andrew Harvey' ; 'talk OSM Australian List
-
From: fors...@ozonline.com.au
Sent: Thursday, 27 January 2022 10:22 PM
To: Phil Wyatt
Cc: 'Andrew Harvey' ; 'talk OSM Australian List'
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Deletion of walking tracks/paths
Hi
Out in the middle of nowhere I would use path unless there was an explicit
prohibition of bicycles
, Phil Wyatt mailto:p...@wyatt-family.com> > wrote:
Just a quick thing I noticed – the main tagging page says not to use do not use
<https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway> highway=
<https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dfootway> footway and the
pre
ighway> highway=
<https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpath> path, but the walking
track page mentions that tag regularly – what is the differentiation?
From: Andrew Harvey
Sent: Monday, 24 January 2022 10:54 PM
To: talk OSM Australian List
Cc: Tony Forster ; nwast
Thanks Graeme,
I will have a crack at a few in Southern Tasmania (which has nearly 1900 of
them!). I am hoping ‘Multi Pass’ and his import account of ‘Round Circle’ is
intending to come back and fix a few of his!
Cheers - Phil
From: Graeme Fitzpatrick
Sent: Wednesday, 26 January
1 - 100 di 224 matches
Mail list logo
