Even in Map Roulette, there are some places where I could have taken a larger
chunk, a single area with 5 connectivity errors is just as easy to fix; I
just got one such roulette spin, and wasn't sure if I should fix the others
or not, because there's no way to mark them fixed.
Fix them
What would be saved by dropping the nameless intermittent streams assuming
they were simplified?
I expect this really varies by location. In my area (Washington County, Oregon)
these streams were quite useless. Most of them were just plain gone, replaced
by farm fields or suburban housing
The crux of the problem is the answer to the question: Which is more
important, outside/official classifications, or physical characteristics?
The tagging pages on the wiki don't really provide clarity on this
matter.
Although the wiki may not be very clear, this subject has been discussed
On 9/29/2012 2:18 PM, Alan wrote:
Anyone else have problems with recent versions of these no longer working for
them?
Um, sorry, false alarm. After completely clearing out my SD card, and
making sure there were no left over recycle bin or hidden files, I tried
it all again and it worked.
On 9/29/2012 2:18 PM, Alan wrote:
Anyone else have problems with recent versions of these no longer working for
them?
Um, sorry, false alarm. After completely clearing out my SD card, and
making sure there were no left over recycle bin or hidden files, I tried
it all again and it worked.
On Sun, 2012-09-30 at 21:09 -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
Could folks that are having trouble try some single
tiles or a set generated directly from Lambertus's site?
OK, I tried directly from Lambertus's site.
I tried the pre-defined state of Oregon from
Another suggestion: motorways and trunks without lanes=number tags
- Alan
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
On Sat, 2012-09-29 at 17:48 -0400, Richard Welty wrote:
my Nuvi is relatively new (about 2 years old). how old is the firmware
on your Nuvi?
Mine is rather old. Not sure about the date, but probably at least 5
years old. It just says Nuvi 200, software version 5.00, GPS SW
Version 2.20b.
about
applying it to the TIGER tiles to fix the grey
Toby
On Sep 21, 2012 1:23 PM, Alan Millar grunthos...@yahoo.com wrote:
Maybe everyone else knows this, but I just discovered it myself so I
thought I would share it.
I've been using Remap-a-tron to fix up US roads. I use both
Maybe everyone else knows this, but I just discovered it myself so I
thought I would share it.
I've been using Remap-a-tron to fix up US roads. I use both the Bing
imagery and the TIGER 2012 tiles overlaid, and it makes it really
useful.
However, I've been frustrated that I can pretty far in
Here is a neighborhood that could be imported from TIGER 2012:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=32.29183lon=-95.4831zoom=17
Thanks
- Alan
If most of it really is missing then it might be a good candidate to
re-import from new TIGER data as I have done in some other hard hit
areas of LA. It
Quite a few hours later, I'm still seeing the 403 errors on those two paths.
I've cleared browser cache and reloaded, with no improvment :-(
Forbidden
You don't have permission to access /remappingservice/count
on this server.
Apache/2.2.14 (Ubuntu) Server
Yes, that fixed it. Thanks!
- Alan
From: Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org
To: Alan Millar grunthos...@yahoo.com
Cc: Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 1:50 PM
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] The Remap-A-Tron, Second Wave
Mweh. I suck
On Feb 17, 2012, at 2:58 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
Southwest Town Center Loop West comes to mind as a great example of just
plain brain damaged street naming Wilsonville tends to have.
You know, I should find out if I can see Mt Hood when driving east on Southwest
North Dakota Street :-)
-
On Aug 21, 2011, at 11:08 AM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
If you don't like it, you can always find a different country to armchair-map
That's a little harsh.
Where do you live now? New Jersey? Florida? Portland? L.A.? I can't keep
track, but you sure get around to read a lot of signage.
On May 1, 2011, at 10:25 AM, Toby Murray wrote:
Every time I go editing in some new place, I always find another
reason to hate imports.
Yeah... Every time I go editing in some new place, I always find another
reason to hate newbies, too.
If you are looking for a reason to hate something,
On May 1, 2011, at 11:28 AM, Richard Weait wrote:
I think that is different in a significant way. It is much easier to
fix a newbie than to fix an import.
Not if you start your conversation with them with I hate newbies. That was
my real point.
- Alan
I've been checking some of the imported data and my general feel is that it is
overdigitized. I don't know if medium versus high reflects just the quality
or
the amount of digitization. That would be something to check. One could also
just run some sort of simplification algorithm on all
On Mar 22, 2011, at 9:17 PM, Paul Norman wrote:
This is now complete for the area west of Portland Oregon as a test.
http://www.paulnorman.ca/blog/?attachment_id=96 shows the difference.
Nice improvement! I like it.
About 99.8% of the data was untouched since it was imported. I checked the
I've spotted the consensus. Stop your bickering. Either come to an
agreement about this tagging, or ignore each other, but absolutely
stop picking on each other.
You and Frederick seem to be the only ones with that view who
contributed to this thread.
As Ian said, the rest of us just
On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 01:40 -0400, David ``Smith'' wrote:
Maybe we should use signed_name=* or name:signed=* to store
exactly what's on the sign, preserving abbreviation and prefixes where
present?
I found N. Temple, No Temple, and North Temple on city street signs all
within a few blocks.
On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 13:57 -0600, Kevin Atkinson wrote:
My main goal was to separate out the directional prefix because, which
while important for mailing, did not really belong as part of the street
name. I thought I would take care of the suffix as well.
You may think it doesn't really
On Sat, 2010-08-07 at 13:15 -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
I vote for
3) It's there for good reason. If you want abbreviations, tell your map
renderer to garble the data for you. Pre-garbling the data complicates
other usage scenarios. Don't do it.
+1
Call me an abbreviation police if you
How about this proposal for US streets:
(1) Leave name unabbreviated
(2) Put whatever form you want of abbreviated name in name:en
Thoughts?
- Alan
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
On Sat, 2010-08-07 at 22:35 -0600, Kevin Atkinson wrote:
For those voting +1 have you even read my original proposal on the reason I
want to abbreviate?
Yes. You gave a list of reasons it would be OK, and rules people would
have to follow to make it work. Some of the reasons I consider
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 10:51 AM, Stefan Brandle sbran...@cse.taylor.eduwrote:
I suspect that reading all available documentation might be a good
start. :-)
It might, but it also might get you bogged down too. Two years into this
myself, I'm still uncovering corners of all available that
As I manually survey various features (POIs, some hydro, etc.), I
usually try to merge in the data from existing imports so as to
maintain the link (e.g. gnis:feature_id) back to the original
database, in case we want to exchange updates with them again.
this is impossible due to the
On Jul 29, 2010, at 5:41 PM, Anthony wrote:
In any case, I disagree that it's better to leave information you know
to be wrong in rather than deleting it. Perhaps that's our
fundamental disagreement.
For my part in the conversation, I *agree* with you that people
should delete (or fix when
object to
additional tagging for it.
You know, I think people are more in agreement on the whole subject than
it appears from these discussions. The emails look like a lot of
disagreements, but perhaps it is more wording than actual disagreement on
the ideas and substance.
- Alan
--
Alan Millar
Does anybody have sources for license-compatible WMS servers in
Oklahoma? All I am aware of is the USGS data, which is very out of date
to the point of inaccuracy around Tulsa and OKC.
I've found the USGS choices confusing on how to find the right thing,
until recently. This page appears
.
This seems like an excellent project for a small OSM-savvy professional
firm, or Cloudmade, or similar. Maybe AOL wants to start a patch.com branch
in Minneapolis along with an open mapquest project.
- Alan
--
Alan Millar a...@bolis.com
___
Talk
by Alan Millar - accept more than two files
# Process double-quotes
if [ $# -lt 2 ]; then
echo Usage: $0 a.osm b.osm ... \ new.osm 2
exit
fi
echo ?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?
echo osm version='0.6' generator='$0'
FileNumber=0
while [ $# -gt 0 ]
do
echo File $FileNumber $1 12
cat
resorts with their own airstrips. But if you know the
area, and know there is a golf course there and no airstrip, by all means
feel free to fix the map and delete the obsolete airport item.
Thanks for keeping an eye out for this stuff.
- Alan
--
Alan Millar a...@bolis.com
the LWG
has been going through peoples legitimate and illegitimate concerns for
two
years I think it's been now. We've had lawyers checking everything at
every
step of the way.
I personally just want to say thank you to the license working group for
taking on the thankless job of
Perhaps I'm not a typical mapper, but I don't find the existence of
bulk
imported local data to have been particular inhibiting in my
activity level.
I don't believe there is any one thing as a typical mapper. But I
certainly agree with you myself, and so do many others, as witnessed
by
On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 06:07 +, talk-us-requ...@openstreetmap.org
wrote:
Heh, I didn't even know we had Oregon data available.
We didn't at the time. I checked. Metro had (still has) restrictive
licensing, and the state did not have any clearing house at the time.
- Alan
no one is interested to cleanup crap after a bad import.
I am.
tiger import was great from technical
point of view but didn't allow to build a community from scratch.
I didn't want to build anything from scratch. I'm simply not that
motivated to go out and wander everywhere mapping
However in reality it is a staggered junction.
So I need to split the North-South way into two pieces and it intersects
the East-West way in two places.
Depending on how far off the stagger is, you also may want to consider not
splitting it, but just aligning the streets with two extra nodes.
I have been playing around with the TIGER 2008 data, which, for some of
the counties around Atlanta seems to be much better than the old data.
If I import it for some of the counties, though, I would like to import
the addresses in a format that would be usable for routing software.
The most
I'd also be very happy if JOSM flipped the tag for me when I edit a
tiger object. It seems reasonable enough that if I'm editing something
that we can consider it reviewed. I certainly don't want to have to go
flip it manually every time I go fixing some minor road details.
Good idea. (I
There's a copy tags feature in JOSM that doesn't seem to work. That's
about the only way I know of right now.
Pasting tags from node to way did not work for me, as recently as just a
few weeks ago. However, I tried it just now on the current version 1515
and it worked.
If there are tags on
if you can put the list of features along with the corrisponding OSM
tag to a wiki page, this would be helpful :)
(then i can help match features cross-check to what i have)
Unfortunately, in the case of my import for USGS Geonames items, they
don't have specific feature categories. I'm
One wonders what could be motivating the
County to continue this very expensive resistance to complying with
the PRA.
preach audience=choir
Probably because Santa Clara is Silicon Valley, where a great amount of
the local economy has been based on intellectual property law and issues.
does the census bureau publish any sort of a diff, or delta dataset?
i'd think that just in terms of raw crunching that having just the
differences from year to year would save a lot of work, both manual
and CPU-cycles.
Not that I've seen. What they do publish is the TLID and TZID numbers in
Does anyone with knowledge of the script have time to fix things in
Austin?
Yes, I will take care of it. Thanks for finding it.
Well, that was interesting. There were about 200 braided streets in
Austin that I found and fixed. They must really like the center island
type of street. Let me
In the US at least, I didn't think works paid for by the government could
have a restrictive copyright claim placed on them.
In the US we have several levels of governments. Works created by the
nation-wide federal government cannot be copyrighted. However, that does
not apply to state,
It looks like a lot of useful information can be gleaned from this,
especially county, township, park, and municipality borders.
I'm not sure if, or how, the maps could be used directly without some
sort of PDF overlay method in JOSM, or maybe a highly speciallized PDF
- OSM converter.
I
47 matches
Mail list logo
