it shows up as invalid
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Peter Hampf
Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2000 10:51 AM
To: TBBETA
Subject: Cert from WEB.DE
Hello TBBETA,
I'm using a cert from WEB.DE now and what I'd like to know is: How
does it
Hello Stefan,
On Wednesday, July 19, 2000 you wrote:
LG>> I got an e-mail from one of my newsletter subscribers asking how to
LG>> get his .eml associations back to OE. Anybody have any ideas? I'll
LG>> spelunk the registry here in a few, but wondered if there was a
LG>> simpler way.
ST> The val
Konichiwa, folks,
I have an account at softhome.net and often TB! hungs at receiving :(
After trying to close progress window, it and whole TB! cannot be closed -
only via TaskMan..
This crap happens only with betas - 1.44 works properly (all windows can
be closed safetly), why ?
X-> S
Hello TBBETA,
I'm using a cert from WEB.DE now and what I'd like to know is: How
does it show up in your TB?
Background: You most likely do not have a root cert from WEB.DE. Is my
cert valid in this case or not? (i.e. do we have to install the root
certs to validate user certs?)
--
R
On Wed, 19 Jul 2000 09:06:03 -0700, Nick Andriash wrote:
C>> No, it hasn't been signed by anyone. You've hit on a point
C>> that has concerned me. Most people whom I've received public keys
C>> from have not had theirs signed by anyone.
NA> Why does that concern you Allie?
Well,
On Wed, Jul 19, 2000 at 11:50:25AM -0500, Nick Danger wrote:
> While I don't doubt that takes place, is it really a major concern for
> most folks? Anybody snooping my email will be one bored snooper.
> Sure, I understand a concern for privacy but what could be a realistic
> figure of sent email
Hallo Mario,
MT> Any hints, or any other sites to get a certification?
At http://www.trustcenter.de you get a free "express" certificate. Registration is
easy.
best regards
--
Jonas Koopmann @ Mittwoch, 19. Juli 2000, 19:06:31
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://forum.compuserve.de/gerint
ICQ#
THAWTE is the best and the cheapest (free). When you try and get a
certificate, initially, just accept all the default values and do not change
anything. Also make sure that your security is at MEDIUM or the keys may
not download.
Michael
THAWTE Notary
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL P
This message: 19/07/2000 17:47 GMT.
Hello Nick,
On 19 July 2000 at 08:56:06 GMT -0700 (which was 16:56 where I live)
Nick ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) typed:
NA> Anyone else experiencing this, or is there some other way to add Senders
NA> Certificates to some other kind of data bank?
I followed your
Hi Ulrich,
you wrote at Tuesday, July 18, 2000:
> I am the one to blame for the instruction page at
> http://www.mindquake.com.br/thebat/ ... I hope that it was/is
> useful. :)
I have much problems with thawte, starting from active-x controls that
produces fatal errors (in a non-deterministic wa
Hi tracer,
On 19 July 2000 at 19:06:33 GMT +0700 (which was 13:06 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of "no privite key..":
UP>>> ... If you can get a third notary, you will be able to act as a
UP>>> notary by yourself, because you will have the 100 points
Hi Nick,
On 19 July 2000 at 08:56:06 GMT -0700 (which was 16:56 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of "Adding Certificates To Address Book?":
NA> I have followed Max's instructions in obtaining the Certificates of
NA> others by invoking the action in Filte
Hello Leif,
LG> I got an e-mail from one of my newsletter subscribers asking how to
LG> get his .eml associations back to OE. Anybody have any ideas? I'll
LG> spelunk the registry here in a few, but wondered if there was a
LG> simpler way.
The value "Associations Stored" should be removed from t
In Reference to "Signature, Schmignature." From Steve Lamb:
S> Take a look at any news service on the net for the FBIs latest email
S> snooper.
While I don't doubt that takes place, is it really a major concern for
most folks? Anybody snooping my email will be one bored snooper.
Sure, I und
Hi Tony,
On 19 July 2000 at 10:39:07 GMT +0100 (which was 10:39 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of "Certificate availability":
TB> I can't say what the cost is in other countries but it may be a lot
TB> cheaper and a damn site easier than travelling al
On Thu, Jul 20, 2000 at 01:35:01AM +0900, Leif Gregory wrote:
> I will use certificates for e-commerce or other things that require a
> sense of security, but every day e-mails and discussion lists won't
> need them.
Thing is, this makes it a portion of lack of security. You forget to turn
i
Hallo Dirk,
DH> Ahhghh, that's bad, then i need 20 different certificates :-(
DH> Back to PGP :-)
It depends on your cert provider if you can have multiple addresses in your
certificate. Ask him or look at his homepage. It should be possible.
best regards
--
Jonas Koopmann @ Mittwoch, 19. Ju
Beta/11 will be available within a hour.
[!] Save template now works!!
[-] E-mail addresses in message headers of S/MIME signed message weren't compared with
e-mail addresses in certificates (1.45 Beta/9)
[-] wasn't expanded (1.45 Beta/9)
[+] MD2 algorithm supported. It is using in Verisign Ro
18 matches
Mail list logo
