In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
JW o Will it give me an OTFE implementation that I can use (i.e.
JW that will search my message base without hanging and also
JW preserve my settings while migrating)?
9 Actually I don't think problems with search reported in list are
9
On Wednesday, July 27, 2005 at 02:37 (which was Wednesday, July 27,
2005 at 1:37 where I am) Jay Walker wrote:
I have no idea what is the best charset for me to use. One account
seems to be set to default at Latin 9 (ISO) and another account
seems to be set to default at Western European
Hello tbbeta,
I don't know if this is the right list, but I have a possible bug
to report.
I have found that if I sort messages by receive date, and the receive
date is the same for some messages (that is, they are all fetched from
pop3 in the same minute), they are
Hallo Jay,
On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 08:06:02 +0300GMT (27-7-2005, 7:06 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
AY What I mean to say is that in 3.51.10 - and maybe in some earlier
AY versions - I go to my Tools menu and see at the bottom an arrow that
AY is unnamed (Voldemort?) pointing to a submenu that is
Hello all,
Wednesday, July 27, 2005, Goncalo Farias wrote:
JW o Will it give me an OTFE implementation that I can use (i.e.
JW that will search my message base without hanging and also
JW preserve my settings while migrating)?
9 Actually I don't think problems with search reported
On 7/27/05, Roelof Otten wrote:
On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 08:06:02 +0300GMT (27-7-2005, 7:06 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
AY What I mean to say is that in 3.51.10 - and maybe in some earlier
AY versions - I go to my Tools menu and see at the bottom an arrow that
AY is unnamed (Voldemort?)
Hello Jay,
On Wednesday, July 27, 2005, at 4:05:30 AM, you wrote
re: 3.51.10 Muggle Bat:
JW Mine is also not an edited Tools menu. Never did any customization.
JW But what I am missing is what used to be at the bottom and is still
JW visible as a ghostly remnant - the Wizards. See my attached
Hello Wayne,
On Wednesday, July 27, 2005, at 5:14:08 AM, you wrote
re: 3.51.10 Muggle Bat:
WH I had the same problem. As Mary Bull indicated, this was fixed in the
WH latest version (3.51.10) mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], but
WH apparently (by my observation) some tbuuser.defs have become
WH corrupted.
Hello Wayne,
On Wednesday, July 27, 2005, at 5:14:08 AM, you wrote
re: 3.51.10 Muggle Bat:
WH Resolved: I had to delete my tbuser.def and allow it to be recreated.
WH Then I could modify it as it normally should. Apparently somewhere
WH along the line my tbuser.def got corrupted. Perhaps this
On 7/27/05, Wayne Howard wrote:
I should also have said that you should backup your existing
tbuser.def first. You will lose any modifications that you have made
that are stored here. However, for me, remaking the few modifications
I had was well worth it!
Recreating the tbuser.def file
Hello Jay,
On Wednesday, July 27, 2005, at 6:24:50 AM, you wrote
re: 3.51.10 Muggle Bat:
JW Recreating the tbuser.def file resolves the issue, but how many
JW settings will I have to restore now? I seem to recall that a similar
JW problem was resolved once before without forcing users to
Yesterday I sent TBBETA TBUDL unsubscribe requests to the address in the
headers. I am still receiving list mail. How long does it usually take for
unsubscribe requests to be completed?
--
Dave
Current beta is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBBETA'
On 7/27/05, Wayne Howard wrote:
I am the wrong person to ask. I discovered this on my own, with some
help from Mary. As far as it being corrupted, that is my speculation.
It could very well be that it simply has outmoded or superfluous
entries. Look at it in notepad. It contains a lot of
On 7/27/05, Dave Gorman wrote:
Yesterday I sent TBBETA TBUDL unsubscribe requests to the address in the
headers. I am still receiving list mail. How long does it usually take for
unsubscribe requests to be completed?
Try going to the following URL:
On Wednesday, July 27, 2005 at 4:14:08 AM [GMT -0500], Wayne Howard
wrote:
Resolved: I had to delete my tbuser.def and allow it to be recreated.
Then I could modify it as it normally should. Apparently somewhere
along the line my tbuser.def got corrupted. Perhaps this explains a
part of the
On Wednesday, July 27, 2005 at 6:11:56 AM [GMT -0500], Jay Walker wrote:
Anyway, thanks for helping to track down the problem, Wayne. I think
that there is a bug here that RL must fix, but I imagine that the bug
has already been reported in numerous places. So the only question
that remains
Hello Jay,
On Wednesday, July 27, 2005, at 7:11:56 AM, you wrote
re: 3.51.10 Muggle Bat:
JW Anyway, thanks for helping to track down the problem, Wayne. I think
JW that there is a bug here that RL must fix, but I imagine that the bug
JW has already been reported in numerous places. So the only
Hello -=Curtis=-,
On Wednesday, July 27, 2005, at 7:38:38 AM, you wrote
re: 3.51.10 Muggle Bat:
C AV's
What is an AV?
--
Cheers!
Wayne Howard
Using The Bat! version: 3.51.10
Directory Opus 8: The Explorer replacement and File Management solution for
Windows
See the tutorial: Getting to know
Hello all,
Wednesday, July 27, 2005, Wayne Howard wrote:
C AV's
What is an AV?
abbreviation of Access Violation
--
Bye
Marek Mikus
Czech support of The Bat!
http://www.thebat.cz
Using the best The Bat! 3.51.10
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1
Notebook Acer, Pentium4-M 2.2
Het is nu woensdag 27 juli 2005, 16:36:56 h :
Hoi tbbeta,
okay. these days I go for the daily-bat but it's not updated on a daily
basis apparently. So I wanted to go back/forth to beta-10 but couldn't find it
on my puter. sigh
Hence, I went to the Ritlabs site and this is what I
Hello Cees!
On Wednesday, July 27, 2005, 9:39 AM, you wrote:
whatever happened to 9 (which I have) and 10 (which I lost?)
Confused? you won't be after next weeks episode of Ritlabs! :)
Look on the public download page at www.ritlabs.com .
3.51 there is the same as 3.51.10.
Was
Het was op woensdag 27 juli 2005 om 16:51 uur dat jij iets schreef over
'version confusion' :
Hoi Mary,
whatever happened to 9 (which I have) and 10 (which I lost?)
Confused? you won't be after next weeks episode of Ritlabs! :)
MB Look on the public download page at www.ritlabs.com
Hello Cees!
On Wednesday, July 27, 2005, 10:01 AM, you wrote:
MB I *think* the above information is correct. It's what 9Val told me, or
MB at least, what I understood him to be telling me. :)
Czech's all Greek to me too :D
Bless your heart! I verily do not believe that 9Val is Czech! Rather,
Hello beta testers.
I reported this for 3.5 RC7. No change since then.
,- [ mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
| I don't know when this features was introduced (quite cool, actually -
| looks Outlook-like) but am I the only one who thinks it behaves
| strangely?
|
| If I set up a view mode that
Hello Wayne,
On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 09:09:40 -0400 GMT (27/07/2005, 20:09 +0700 GMT),
Wayne Howard wrote:
WH It has. As I mentioned in my first post to you, see the following:
WH this was fixed in the latest version (3.51.10)
WH mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] However, I don't think the fix
WH fixes
Hello Stuart,
On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 07:06:09 -0500 GMT (27/07/2005, 19:06 +0700 GMT),
Stuart Cuddy wrote:
SC Unless you have a specific reason for sorting by Received time you may
SC want to switch by Created time. This way replies are usually after
SC the original message.
I have a specific
Hello Thomas,
On Wednesday, July 27, 2005, at 1:11:17 PM, you wrote
re: 3.51.10 Muggle Bat:
TF Probably. I see the same empty menu item as you. But I am not willing
TF to delete my tbuser.def file, because I don't know what I will have to
TF reconfigure.
TF What's the way out?
I told you all I
Hello all,
Wednesday, July 27, 2005, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
Probably. I see the same empty menu item as you. But I am not willing
to delete my tbuser.def file, because I don't know what I will have to
reconfigure.
What's the way out?
Wizards item in Tools menu was available in older
Hello Marek,
On Wednesday, July 27, 2005, at 1:40:44 PM, you wrote
re: 3.51.10 Muggle Bat:
MM - delete part from tbuser.def manually:
MM close TB
MM open tbuser.def
MM find following part:
hr
container item [MailerForm].[mWizards]
{
item [MailerForm].[Wizards]
hr
Hello all,
Wednesday, July 27, 2005, Wayne Howard wrote:
MM - delete part from tbuser.def manually:
MM close TB
MM open tbuser.def
MM find following part:
hr
container item [MailerForm].[mWizards]
{
item [MailerForm].[Wizards]
hr
item
Hello Marek,
On Wednesday, July 27, 2005, at 2:15:26 PM, you wrote
re: 3.51.10 Muggle Bat:
What does this part of your explanation do?
MM removes unused Wizards items from main menu Tools, TB displays
MM what it finds in tbuser.def or in def file included in thebat.exe.
I guess I didn't
Hello Marek Mikus everyone else,
on 27-Jul-2005 at 19:40 you (Marek Mikus) wrote:
find following part:
hr
container item [MailerForm].[mWizards]
{
item [MailerForm].[Wizards]
hr
item [MailerForm].[mwDownloadWizards]
}
delete it
This is still too
Hello all,
Wednesday, July 27, 2005, Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
find following part:
hr
container item [MailerForm].[mWizards]
{
item [MailerForm].[Wizards]
hr
item [MailerForm].[mwDownloadWizards]
}
delete it
This is still too complicated for my taste.
Hello Wayne!
On Wednesday, July 27, 2005, 1:35 PM, you wrote:
What does this part of your explanation do?
MM removes unused Wizards items from main menu Tools, TB displays
MM what it finds in tbuser.def or in def file included in thebat.exe.
I guess I didn't follow that because I don't
Hello Marek,
On Wednesday, July 27, 2005 at 19:40:44 GMT +0200 (which was 19:40:44
where I live), Marek Mikus wrote and made these valuable points on the
subject of 3.51.10 Muggle Bat:
Hello all,
Wednesday, July 27, 2005, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
Probably. I see the same empty menu item as
Hello all,
Wednesday, July 27, 2005, Dick Hoogendoorn wrote:
Uuhhh...any hints how I can achieve this when I'm using OTFE, i.e.
having a tbuser.EEF file rather than a tbuser.def?
maybe there is another solution. Open Customiser, select Main menu
container, select Tools menu item and check,
Hello Ian!
On Wednesday, July 27, 2005, 5:49 PM, you wrote:
It appears that for the smiley to quote, it must have printable white
space after it. It does not quote if there is nothing after it, or if
there is just a carriage return and line feed only after it.
Can anyone confirm :(
Hello all,
Thursday, July 28, 2005, Ian A. White wrote:
I received an update to the BT item advising that this bug had been
fixed, but in reality it has not.
BT report was fixed today, latest build was released yesterday, You
must expect this bugfix in next build, not in previous.
--
Bye
Hoi Ian
If the smiley is the last item on a line and you select that line for quoting,
it depends on what you select as to whether it will selectively quote or not.
If you drag the cursor so that the smiley at the end of the line is just
selected, it will not quote.
If you select the line
Hello Marek!
On Wednesday, July 27, 2005, 6:04 PM, you wrote:
I received an update to the BT item advising that this bug had been
fixed, but in reality it has not.
BT report was fixed today, latest build was released yesterday, You
must expect this bugfix in next build, not in previous.
miércoles, 27 jul 2005 at 16:39, it seems you wrote:
Upcoming release version: 3.6
Latest test build: 3.51.8
WHAT?
Ritlabs, please, number the upcoming release version as 3.60.
--
/\/ Using The Bat! 3.51.10 Professional with OTFE
/ \ / \ /
Hello Natasha!
On Wednesday, July 27, 2005, 6:08 PM, you wrote:
Can anyone confirm :(
Absolutely. In addition, as I wrote in my note attached to the BT,
any smiley on the last line will not be quoted unless another
line/paragraph below the one with the smiley/s is selected. But only
if the
Hello Ian!
On Wednesday, July 27, 2005, 6:12 PM, you wrote:
MB If you would like to, perhaps you will add another supporting note, in
MB regard to the bug's still being present in v. 3.51.10. I would very
MB much appreciate your doing that.
MB http://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=3889
I
Hoi Mary
Natasha, if you have the time, could you put a further note to that effect at
http://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=3889
Already done. :realtardis:
--
Groetjes
Natasha
The Bat! 3.51.10 Pro on Windows XP Pro 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
Hello Natasha!
On Wednesday, July 27, 2005, 6:19 PM, you wrote:
Natasha, if you have the time, could you put a further note to that effect at
http://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=3889
Already done. :realtardis:
I am soo behind-the-times! Thanks a mil for the support!! :)
Well, when Diman
Hoi Mary
I guess we just have to wait for the next beta release, to see if it really is
fixed.
I've just checked the daily build link: this still retrieves 3.51.9 - so no help
there. The change log (whichcanalsobefoundat
On 7/28/05, NetVicious wrote:
miércoles, 27 jul 2005 at 16:39, it seems you wrote:
Upcoming release version: 3.6
Latest test build: 3.51.8
WHAT?
Ritlabs, please, number the upcoming release version as 3.60.
NV, I completely agree, but... as others have argued... TB has
Hello Natasha!
Thanks for this welcome Private Mail!
On Wednesday, July 27, 2005, 6:51 PM, you wrote:
I guess we just have to wait for the next beta release, to see if it really
is
fixed.
I've just checked the daily build link: this still retrieves 3.51.9 - so no
help
there. The
Hello Mary!
On Wednesday, July 27, 2005, 7:07 PM, you wrote:
Thanks for this welcome Private Mail!
On Wednesday, July 27, 2005, 6:51 PM, you wrote:
I guess we just have to wait for the next beta release, to see if it really
is
fixed.
I've just checked the daily build link: this still
Hoi Mary
Well, I guess I have a messed-up filter. Wasn't a PM. And I'm getting a little
tired at the end of a long day, so I failed to double-check my To field before
sending.
Happens to us all at one time or another.
Apologies to Natasha and to the list.
None necessary to me, and I'm
Hello Natasha!
On Wednesday, July 27, 2005, 7:26 PM, you wrote:
Well, I guess I have a messed-up filter. Wasn't a PM. And I'm getting a
little
tired at the end of a long day, so I failed to double-check my To field
before
sending.
Happens to us all at one time or another.
Apologies to
Hello Marek,
On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 19:40:44 +0200 GMT (28/07/2005, 00:40 +0700 GMT),
Marek Mikus wrote:
MM But if was tbuser.def created by old betaversion with this item
MM included, it can't be automatically hided by new build, current
MM version can't delete only part of tbuser.def.
MM Now You
On 7/28/05, Mary Bull [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Natasha!
Come on, girls, please take it offline already. That's four messages
so far, and I am starting to feel like a captive voyeur. :yech:
--
jaywalker
Windows XP Pro SP2 and The Bat! Pro (No OTFE) 3.51.10
Hi everyone
Anyone else experiencing the following?
1. Setup a Read Messages filter for an IMAP Inbox to send each message to a
common folder when it's marked read.
2. Read a message in the IMAP Inbox.
3. On exiting the following are true:
a. The message is moved to the
I just thought to download the 3.51 MSI to test how it upgrades a
simple, largely non-functional OTFE installation on a desktop that I
rarely use. So once again I had an opportunity to see the advert for
Lycos Mail. I must admit that I still find that advert confusing,
mainly because it appears to
55 matches
Mail list logo
