On Friday, 05 August 2005 at 07:42, Peter Palmreuther wrote:
>> So all TB! users, who don't write in English, should tell their
>> customers not to name their documents with "special characters"? I
>> see...
> That's not the point! C'mon, stop hounding.
I'm not hounding, but I'll give my best t
Hello Jay,
On Thursday, August 4, 2005 at 1:00:08 PM Jay [JW] wrote:
JW> On 8/4/05, Manuel Breitfeld wrote:
>> I'm sorry, this was just a duplicate entry. The entry, which is currently
>> open
>> for opinions, is the following: ;)
>>
>> Filenames of attachments are not correctly decoded (RFC 22
Hello Manuel,
On Thursday, August 4, 2005 at 9:50:04 PM Manuel [MB] wrote:
MB> On Thursday, 04 August 2005 at 21:34, Vili wrote:
>> Yep, problem. Use English alphabet until fix :)
MB> So all TB! users, who don't write in English, should tell their customers
not
MB> to name their documents with
Hi -=Curtis=-,
On Thu, 4 Aug 2005 21:41:35 -0500 UTC (8/4/2005, 9:41 PM -0500 UTC my
time), -=Curtis=- wrote:
C> Do you have any of those options set, i.e., to compress folder on exit
C> or when switching to another folder?
An excellent question, and yes, both of them. However, I did not switch
On Thursday, August 04, 2005 at 7:44:37 PM [GMT -0500], Gary wrote:
> I just came across an interesting discovery. If I delete an email, or 100
> emails, they should stay deleted, and not removed unless I alone decide to
> purge them. I have my IMAP set to refresh folders while on-line every 2
> m
Hi Ya'll,
I just came across an interesting discovery. If I delete an email, or 100
emails, they should stay deleted, and not removed unless I alone decide to
purge them. I have my IMAP set to refresh folders while on-line every 2
minutes. It seems when my mail is deleted, and TB! refreshes; the d
Sorry, very bad typo... ;)
> Since it doesn't hurt, I can joke about quite easily... ;)
--> hurt /me/ as a Linux user.
--
Manuel, http://www.manuel-breitfeld.de
Current beta is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
ht
On Thursday, 04 August 2005 at 22:02, Vili wrote:
>> So all TB! users, who don't write in English, should tell their customers
>> not to name their documents with "special characters"? I see...
> I am Hungarian, so we have special characters, also... So this error
> hurts me, too. I tried to jo
>> Yep, problem. Use English alphabet until fix :)
> So all TB! users, who don't write in English, should tell their customers not
> to name their documents with "special characters"? I see...
I am Hungarian, so we have special characters, also... So this error
hurts me, too. I tried to joke :))
On Thursday, 04 August 2005 at 21:34, Vili wrote:
> Yep, problem. Use English alphabet until fix :)
So all TB! users, who don't write in English, should tell their customers not
to name their documents with "special characters"? I see...
--
Manuel, http://www.manuel-breitfeld.de
_
Hello Manuel,
> Attached are three documents - all show some uninteresting content.
> The original names are:
> - À propos publicité.doc
> - grüße.doc
> - resumé.png
> So, let's see how TB! works... ;)
Ok, here is the deal and the source of the problem:
If you see the source of your sent email,
Hello Manuel,
> Attached are three documents - all show some uninteresting content.
> The original names are:
> - À propos publicité.doc
> - grüße.doc
> - resumé.png
> So, let's see how TB! works... ;)
It does not even show that it has attachments...
--
Vili
__
Hello Manuel,
>> Could you just send me the part of the mail source that shows the
>> first some line attachments?
> I hope this one will behave like described and show some "Part" things. ;)
> I didn't test before, but I'm quite sure, that TB! won't decode it right -
> unless the list-daemon modi
Hello Mary,
> On Thursday, August 04, 2005, 1:25 PM, you wrote:
>>> I don't know how to do that Unix mailbox thing though. Otherwise, I
>>> would not mind sharing...
>> Select the message from the message list in the main window, then
>> Tools | Export message to | UNIX mailbox and enter file na
Hi Manuel!
> - À propos publicité.doc
part_01.doc
> - grüße.doc
part_02.doc
> - resumé.png
part.png
and at last
part.txt
--
So long folks,
Raymund
Current beta is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/
Hello Greg!
On Thursday, August 04, 2005, 1:25 PM, you wrote:
>> I don't know how to do that Unix mailbox thing though. Otherwise, I
>> would not mind sharing...
> Select the message from the message list in the main window, then
> Tools | Export message to | UNIX mailbox and enter file name wi
Hello Greg,
Tuesday, August 2, 2005, 8:48:50 PM, among other things, you wrote:
GS>>> PROBLEM when copying from Excel 2002 to HTML email. So my original
comment
GS>>> stands, but only apparently to newer versions of Excel. Hmmm? Sorry
about the
GS>>> HTML email, but think it is appropriate,
Hello Vili!
On Thursday, August 04, 2005, 11:56 AM, you wrote:
>> I get them all the time but have just been ignoring them. I can send you
>> an example if you haven't already received one...let me know.
> Please send me an example, export the whole mail as Unix mailbox and
> attached to a mail
On Thursday, 04 August 2005 at 17:48 Vili wrote:
> Could you just send me the part of the mail source that shows the
> first some line attachments?
I hope this one will behave like described and show some "Part" things. ;)
I didn't test before, but I'm quite sure, that TB! won't decode it right -
On Thursday, August 4, 2005 @ 9:50:07 AM [-0700], Matt Thoene wrote:
>> :))) Ok.
>> Could you just send me the part of the mail source that shows the
>> first some line attachments?
>> I saw part.att as attach ONLY, when part.att was attached to the
>> mail...
> I get them all the time but have
Hello Matt,
> On Thursday, August 4, 2005 @ 8:48:40 AM [-0700], Vili wrote:
>> :))) Ok.
>> Could you just send me the part of the mail source that shows the
>> first some line attachments?
>> I saw part.att as attach ONLY, when part.att was attached to the
>> mail...
> I get them all the time but
On Thursday, August 4, 2005 @ 8:48:40 AM [-0700], Vili wrote:
> :))) Ok.
> Could you just send me the part of the mail source that shows the
> first some line attachments?
> I saw part.att as attach ONLY, when part.att was attached to the
> mail...
I get them all the time but have just been ign
Hello Jay,
> On 8/4/05, Vili wrote:
>> Could you export and send me in private the mail that has this
>> part.att problem?
> Not this time, Vili. I don't share personal email on principle. Think
> of it as a Catholic priest sort of thing. But if I get something less
> sensitive, I'll pass it on.
-BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-
Version: 2.6
mQIPA0GaX6EAAAEQAK97LcaIg1kGx2kwqBGPPv6ziQNB+jBCCHim7eBSFBLLElOw
098hY0iKZgTPYhHEJrSS55nHdEhoIiy6Nv/8PqNnWD839IFCDEZOe6olBlEltY46
LvMxD9Y4//+uUCwOBTVQTUYy33Rd3E7oR8rmwgn0dCljulQ49IJyzSySyeFpdrbj
Q/hxXFOxGxA3oIwXxwC+yaXcx/LrFGKOZWwQD0zw77kVfD/DXpOnQ
Good day, Konstantin.
KZ> People, could you please check/confirm at bugtrack?
KZ> https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5003
it's well-known problem. Sollution is WIP.
--
WBR, Vladimir 'insider' Prohorov
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[email only]|[3MB inbox]|[ICQ #179598229]|[RLU #389152]|[Skype in
Hello,
People, could you please check/confirm at bugtrack?
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5003
With best regards.
- TB! v.3.51.10 on Windows XP Service Pack 2 v.5.1.2600, up 1 days, 4h 15m 8s
- BayesIt! 0.8.1, MyMacros 1.11a, TBPajsMacro v.0.6.5.11
--
Konstantin Zhilenko
[EMAIL PROTECT
On 8/4/05, Vili wrote:
> Could you export and send me in private the mail that has this
> part.att problem?
Not this time, Vili. I don't share personal email on principle. Think
of it as a Catholic priest sort of thing. But if I get something less
sensitive, I'll pass it on.
--
jaywalker
Windows
On Thursday, 04 August 2005 at 13:45 Vili wrote:
> part.ATT means that it is part of a multipart attachment that cannot
> be decoded. Normally, OE used to send out this kind of "attachments".
There's no need to write attachments in quotation.
As you can see in BT, TB! doesn't fully support RFC in
Hello Jay,
> On 8/4/05, Manuel Breitfeld wrote:
>> I'm sorry, this was just a duplicate entry. The entry, which is currently
>> open
>> for opinions, is the following: ;)
>>
>> Filenames of attachments are not correctly decoded (RFC 2231):
>> https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4197
> Yes, th
On 8/4/05, Manuel Breitfeld wrote:
> I'm sorry, this was just a duplicate entry. The entry, which is currently open
> for opinions, is the following: ;)
>
> Filenames of attachments are not correctly decoded (RFC 2231):
> https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4197
Yes, this definitely sounds lik
Hi me,
On Thursday, 04 August 2005 at 11:25 Manuel Breitfeld wrote:
> The author of this entry told me that the bug still exists, although Marek
> set it to resolved.
I'm sorry, this was just a duplicate entry. The entry, which is currently open
for opinions, is the following: ;)
Filenames of
Hi Peter,
On Thursday, 04 August 2005 at 10:41Peter Palmreuther wrote:
>> What you say makes sense. So one person who sends me these .att files
>> is using Apple Mail (2.622). So maybe it's a Mac thing?
>
> I'd say that's possible and reasonable. I can imagine the Apple mailer
> sending messages
Hello Jay,
On Thursday, August 4, 2005 at 10:27:44 AM Jay [JW] wrote:
JW> On 8/4/05, Peter Palmreuther wrote:
>> I'd say yes. Something formatted the text in a way The Bat! ain't
>> using, so I'd say it's a sender side thing. Maybe you want to have a
>> look in these messages headers for "X-Maile
On 8/4/05, Peter Palmreuther wrote:
> I'd say yes. Something formatted the text in a way The Bat! ain't
> using, so I'd say it's a sender side thing. Maybe you want to have a
> look in these messages headers for "X-Mailer" ... Maybe the people you
> receive the "Part.ATT" mail from are using the sa
Hello Jay,
On Thursday, August 4, 2005 at 6:14:19 AM Jay [JW] wrote:
JW> It seems that since "upgrading" to 3.51.10 more people have started to
JW> complain that messages they send to me are not delivered.
"Delivery" is not the job of The Bat!. The Bat!s job is to *receive* ;-)
JW> I am also re
35 matches
Mail list logo
