Postponed sending has STOPPED WORKING
Going back 1 version
I just confirmed here again, my afternoon scheduled sends did not go out
Can anyone else confirm it? Thanks in advanceI
I have opened a bug tracker report for this
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=34
Postponed sending worked
if
(GMT) Greenwich Mean Time : Dublin, Edinburgh, Lisbon, London
timezone is used and it's daylight saving time
Postponed sending has STOPPED WORKING
Going back 1 version
I just confirmed here again, my afternoon scheduled sends did not go out
Can anyone else confirm it? Thanks in advance
Hello Rick,
Thursday, June 28, 2012, 10:40:10 PM, you wrote:
R I just confirmed here again, my afternoon scheduled sends did not go out
R Can anyone else confirm it? Thanks in advance
I never use the feature but am trying it with this one...
--
Best Wishes,
Mark
Hello,
Thursday, June 28, 2012, 11:30:38 PM, you wrote:
R I just confirmed here again, my afternoon scheduled sends did not go out
R Can anyone else confirm it? Thanks in advance
MP I never use the feature but am trying it with this one...
It seems to have worked.
However, since I don't use
Hello Rick,
Thursday, June 28, 2012, 10:40:10 PM, you wrote:
R I just confirmed here again, my afternoon scheduled sends did not go out
R Can anyone else confirm it? Thanks in advance
I never use the feature but am trying it with this one...
I went back to 5.1.6.6 and it works perfectly
In this beta, postponed sending is broken.
Confirmations?
--
Rick
All that we see or seem
Is but a dream within a dream
~ Edgar Allan Poe ~
v5.0.0.145 BETA on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600
Service Pack 3
Current beta is 5.0.0.145
Hello all,
Saturday, March 5, 2011, Rick wrote:
In this beta, postponed sending is broken.
add more details, here it works with 1 minute delay
5.3.2011, 21:17:41: SEND - connected to SMTP server mikus
5.3.2011, 21:17:42: SEND - sending message to marek.mi...@ipex.cz
5.3.2011, 21:17:42
Hello all,
Saturday, March 5, 2011, Rick wrote:
In this beta, postponed sending is broken.
add more details, here it works with 1 minute delay
I don't have any more details. I have 5 set to go at 2 AM and another at 2 PM.
None of them went.
What details would you like me to get and where
Hello all,
Saturday, March 5, 2011, Rick wrote:
I don't have any more details. I have 5 set to go at 2 AM and another at
2 PM. None of them went.
What details would you like me to get and where do I get them?
I reopened the bug track report
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=7716
so
I reopened the bug track report
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=7716
so every message should be sent in specific time?
TB us running, but messages are not sent?
do You have anything in account log related to selected time?
do You see postponed tasks in scheduller?
5 messages go
Hello,
I have tried some tests and postponed sending from POP account works OK,
while sending from IMAP account (GMX.com) with remote Outbox does not -
task is created in Scheduller, but no sending is executed.
Confirmations?
--
Thanks and Bye,
Marek Mikus
Czech support of The Bat!
http
Hello,
I have updated postponed message in remote IMAP Outbox three-times and when
I am checking Scheduller, there are three running tasks for this message
there. As I expect, TB should update existing one or remove old.
Cinfirmations?
--
Thanks and Bye,
Marek Mikus
Czech support of The Bat!
For the second time in a week, I have had Messages set up to go out over the
next several day GO OUT ALL AT ONCE.
I don't know what happened the first time but this time they went out after a
send receive all That may or may not have anything to do with it.
--
Rick
When I die, I want to go
The sent message when postponed sending had the date it will be sent only,
not the time it will be sent
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=8372
--
Rick
Help bring to a close, the Age of Greed
v5.0.0.132 BETA on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600
Service Pack 3
This MSI release did not address the problems with Postponed sending.
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=7732
--
Rick
You're only young once; you can be immature forever
v4.2.33.9 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600
Service Pack 3
Hello Rick,
Thursday, April 08, 2010, 19:07:44, you wrote:
This MSI release did not address the problems with Postponed sending.
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=7732
Yes, we know that. We plan to start working on finding a solution to the
Postponed sending problem, after releasing a beta
Hello Rick,
Thursday, April 08, 2010, 19:07:44, you wrote:
This MSI release did not address the problems with Postponed sending.
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=7732
Yes, we know that. We plan to start working on finding a solution
to the Postponed sending problem, after releasing
Is it by design that if I create a message with postponed sending set, then
don't hit the send button, but simply save it (shift-F2), then no warning
appears, but the message gets sent a the scheduled time?
I was under the impression that the message wouldn't get sent, since I didn't
hit
This time I think it is because the scheduler gets choked with done items
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=7799
--
Rick
Second star to the right, and straight on 'til morning. - Kirk
v4.2.13.4 ALPHA on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600
Service Pack 3
I have opened a issue in the bug tracker for Postponed sending not working
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=7732
In the latest version, 4.2.10.16 I am finding postponed sending fully working
and operational. I added a note to the bug tracker
--
Rick
Have you ever wondered if the one
send it.
R I have opened a issue in the bug tracker for Postponed sending not working
R https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=7732
Cannot confirm, sorry. At my end all the postponed sending messages are
stored as draft (i.e. marked as 'parked') and they go out as scheduled.
I carried
I have tried a number of different settings (one at a time), but still
no change. I am now more convinced than ever that the message is being
flagged as a draft by The Bat! and this is why the scheduler cannot
send it.
I have opened a issue in the bug tracker for Postponed sending
send it.
R I have opened a issue in the bug tracker for Postponed sending not working
R https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=7732
Cannot confirm, sorry. At my end all the postponed sending messages are
stored as draft (i.e. marked as 'parked') and they go out as scheduled.
I carried out
Hallo Ian,
On Fri, 18 Sep 2009 11:25:07 +1000GMT (18-9-2009, 3:25 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
IAW Is there any way that a default delayed sending can be set for an
IAW account WITHOUT having to set any template with a macro?
No, you need a macro in your templates for that.
--
Groetjes,
Finally I found two nice applications for this feature:
a.) Every week another member give a presentation about his/her work
progress. There is a list printed, but they used to complain that I
forgot. Now they got a reminder 1 day before someone is due to give a
lecture. No more complaint
Finally I found two nice applications for this feature:
a.) Every week another member give a presentation about his/her work
progress. There is a list printed, but they used to complain that I
forgot. Now they got a reminder 1 day before someone is due to give a
lecture. No more complaint
G'day Neal,
On Thursday, September 10, 2009, at 2:33:25 PM, you (Neal Laugman) wrote:
NL No macros - just setting it per message via the message menu:
NL Options Send timing +15 (or +1 hour)
NL and that works perfectly fine. It looks like it may be in in the
NL macro/templating system.
G'day,
To much embarrassment, I have discovered that with postponed sending
is not working. I was quizzed by a client as to why I had not sent is
some work they requested. I was sure I had, only to find that it was
still in the outbox some 2 days after it had be supposed to go.
I know
in The Bat! and
discovered that there were a whole lot of entries for postponed
sending in the Outbox of the Scheduler (which is used to send the
message).
So, for some reason, the message sits in the Scheduler apparently
waiting to be sent, but nothing happens.
Another odd thing
Hi Ian,
on Wednesday, September 09, 2009 at 9:02 PM you wrote:
Hi everyone,
To much embarrassment, I have discovered that with postponed sending
is not working. I was quizzed by a client as to why I had not sent is
some work they requested. I was sure I had, only to find
Hi Ian,
on Wednesday, September 09, 2009 at 9:02 PM you wrote:
Hi everyone,
To much embarrassment, I have discovered that with postponed sending
is not working. I was quizzed by a client as to why I had not sent is
some work they requested. I was sure I had, only to find
G'day Neal,
On Thursday, September 10, 2009, at 8:22:17 AM, you (Neal Laugman) wrote:
L Delayed sending is working here with the default times. I have not
NL tested it with custom times or by setting new preferences. If you
NL could give me some parameters to test I would be more that
even
IAW though the Scheduler knows it as there is a message to be sent, it may
IAW well be a case of the message being seen as a draft and so nothing
IAW happens.
After your first message of this thread I started a series of tests via the
postponed sending icon and and all options, including
Hi Ian,
on Wednesday, September 09, 2009 at 3:26 PM you wrote:
G'day Neal,
On Thursday, September 10, 2009, at 8:22:17 AM, you (Neal Laugman) wrote:
NL Delayed sending is working here with the default times. I have not
NL tested it with custom times or by setting new preferences.
On Wednesday, September 9, 2009, 4:35:04 PM, Rick wrote:
That still translates to ... BROKEN.
the problem I keep reporting is that if one sends queued mail, and
there are messages present for delivery later, they get send
immediately.
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385 phone
a message at current time plus 15 min.
Both messages were sent as expected, so I just can say that the
postponed sending feature seems to work.
OK thanks - let me look deeper on this end. It's odd as I have not
been changing the system much i.e. installing programs etc.
The test with an IMAP
a message at current time plus 15 min.
Both messages were sent as expected, so I just can say that the
postponed sending feature seems to work.
OK thanks - let me look deeper on this end. It's odd as I have not
been changing the system much i.e. installing programs etc.
The test with an IMAP
Hello Rick,
Friday, August 28, 2009, 12:25:23 PM, you wrote:
The silence is deafening. And ignoring it doesn't help me, nor does
it help isolate the but and improve the product
Sorry for the lack of response.
I do use the feature and it does work for me. I use it to send out
mail that I
Hello Rick,
Friday, August 28, 2009, 12:25:23 PM, you wrote:
The silence is deafening. And ignoring it doesn't help me, nor does
it help isolate the but and improve the product
Sorry for the lack of response.
I do use the feature and it does work for me. I use it to send out
mail that
Mine had been working in a similar manner. I scheduled 5 emails to go out at
8 am and 5 more at 2 pm sometimes 8 or 9 days in advance.
I am really interested what you use it for specifically. Really, no
offense (you know my view on this new tool), I would like to
understand or even tell my
Mine had been working in a similar manner. I scheduled 5 emails to go out at
8 am and 5 more at 2 pm sometimes 8 or 9 days in advance.
I am really interested what you use it for specifically. Really, no
offense (you know my view on this new tool), I would like to
understand or even tell my
it?
Confirm anyone?
Is there anyone with an interest in postponed sending?
--
Rick
The fragrance always stays in the hand that gives the rose. - Hada Bejar
v4.2.10.7 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600
Service Pack 3
Current beta is 4.2.10.7
On Thursday, August 27, 2009, 10:54:47 AM, Rick wrote:
Is there anyone with an interest in postponed sending?
I really have no apparent need for it. I tested it several times, and
never saw it get fixed.
I use it extensively. It has been working flawlessly. It started getting flakey
On Thursday, August 27, 2009, 10:54:47 AM, Rick wrote:
Is there anyone with an interest in postponed sending?
I really have no apparent need for it. I tested it several times, and
never saw it get fixed.
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
a message at current time plus 15 min.
Both messages were sent as expected, so I just can say that the
postponed sending feature seems to work.
Cheers!
VA
- --
Volker Ahrendt | q...@ahrendt.net
Direct eMail without [tbb] in subject line will end in Nirvana!
Using /\^o^/\! 4.2.10.7 [Pro] on Windows XP
a message at current time plus 15 min.
Both messages were sent as expected, so I just can say that the
postponed sending feature seems to work.
OK thanks - let me look deeper on this end. It's odd as I have not been
changing the system much i.e. installing programs etc.
--
Rick
It is a good
On Thursday, August 27, 2009, 11:09:07 AM, Dwight Corrin wrote:
Is there anyone with an interest in postponed sending?
I really have no apparent need for it. I tested it several times, and
never saw it get fixed.
I just sent a delayed message from my IMAP account. When I hit
I send out 5 items at 8 am and again at 2 pm.
Today NONE of the items went out for the 8 am send
The setting I use to send them, that has been working flawlessly is
%POSTPONE=25-Aug-2009 08:00
Perhaps I should have asked if anyone else is having the same issue or would
mind testing it?
The Postponed Sending / Custom / Less Button will sometimes not show the word
Less when sending several messages although the button is still functional
confirmations?
--
Rick
Not only is the universe stranger than we imagine, it is stranger than we can
imagine. - Sir Arthur Eddington
[Reply to: »Rick« · 2009-05-19 · 01:43 h (CET)]
Moin, Rick!
The Postponed Sending / Custom / Less Button will sometimes not show
the word Less when sending several messages although the button is
still functional
confirmations?
Yep, confirmed!
Cheers!
VA
- --
Direct eMail without [tbb
[Reply to: »Rick« · 2009-05-19 · 01:43 h (CET)]
Moin, Rick!
The Postponed Sending / Custom / Less Button will sometimes not show
the word Less when sending several messages although the button is
still functional
I made a bug report
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=7602
--
Rick
Hello,
this issue was fixed in 4.1.11.21 but reappeared again now, I have
reopened issue https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=7570
--
Thanks and Bye,
Marek Mikus
Czech support of The Bat!
http://www.thebat.cz
Using the best The Bat! 4.1.11.27
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3
Hello Peter,
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 18:41:11 +0200 GMT (29/Apr/09, 23:41 +0700 GMT),
Peter Meyns wrote in mid:1556876605.20090429184...@nosuchdomain.com:
PM How about proper S/MIME support?
Please let me know what is wrong with TB!'s S/MIME support. I will
need to use it in the near future by wish
On Friday, May 1, 2009, 7:58:38 PM, Maxim Masiutin wrote:
You were right that we've chosen inappropriate phrases, may be in beta .19
it will get better.
when I try to choose a specific date and time, and tick the time and
use the arrows to scroll it only allows me to scroll one hour, or
Mittwoch, 29. April 2009 at 11:25, Volker Ahrendt wrote:
A few more thoughts brought me to this real flexible solution (see
attachment).
+1 Good Work! Did you think about moving to Chisinau? ;-)
--
With kind Regards
Jens Franik
mailto:je...@gmx.de
Picture of me? X-Rogue
Samstag, 2. Mai 2009 at 02:57, Maxim Masiutin wrote:
You were right, while remaking the dialog we've lost some links
that turn off some checkboxes when the user clicks the other... It
should have been impossible to check them all. You can try .19 to figure out
that it is all right.
[Reply to: »Maxim Masiutin« · 2009-05-02 · 03:06 h (CET)]
Moin, Maxim!
The postponed sending dialog is the graphical editor for the small
textual argument of the %POSTPONE macro, e.g. “+2h” means “add two
hours” or “8:12” means send on 8:12 today if it’s before 8:12,
otherwise send tomorrow
[Reply to: »Jens Franik« · 2009-05-02 · 18:11 h (CET)]
Moin, Jens!
+1 Good Work! Did you think about moving to Chisinau? ;-)
Ummm, I have to think about it, but I am afraid that my Moldovan and
Russian are definitively not good enough. ;-)
Cheers!
VA
- --
Direct eMail without [tbb] in
Sonntag, 3. Mai 2009 at 01:12, Volker Ahrendt wrote:
Is there still any confusion left?
No, i love it!
--
With kind Regards
Jens Franik
mailto:je...@gmx.de
Picture of me? X-Rogue http://www.de2all.de/Kr_bat.jpg
The Bat! 4.1.11.19 + AntiSpamSniper 3.2.0.6 + Gaijin XMP Makro Plugin 1.1.91.0
Hello Mse,
Sunday, April 26, 2009, 13:38:12, you wrote:
1. Another typo is in Temlate macro. The p is missing.
Thank you, we have just fixed it, but the last beta came out before this.
2. What exactly is the macro for a message delay? The user interface
here says '%DELAY=...' in QT it is
Hello Netvicious,
Sunday, April 26, 2009, 0:17:45, you wrote:
But when we are defining a custom delay for a message I think the more
button should not be applied here. I suggest you to place the text
with the real date-time of the sending without pressing any button,
because it's a good
Hello Volker,
Monday, April 27, 2009, 0:00:35, you wrote:
The arrows of the Time box do not work (see attachment), but you can
type a different time in the corresponding field.
This is a behaviour of a standard windows calendar control. Do you know other
software when it works not the same as
Hello Jens,
Tuesday, April 28, 2009, 14:49:07, you wrote:
And i still do not understand why to compare to a date?
Maybe, the wording was too perplexing Now we have rephrased it and it is
now easier to understand without sacrifice in functionality.
For me it would be enough if the Dialog
Hello Jens,
Tuesday, April 28, 2009, 15:06:53, you wrote:
That is enough (until i understand why to have more than that):
http://www.de2all.de/thebat/screen78.png
You were right, while remaking the dialog we've lost some links that turn off
some checkboxes when the user clicks the other... It
Hello Roger,
Tuesday, April 28, 2009, 15:13:48, you wrote:
OK, you are perhaps correct about there not being any other way to test, but
I'm still not sure exactly what is meant by an 'arbitrary' date and time, as
distinct from a required time that is set in the 'postponed' programme.
You were
Hello,
when is Time checkbox in Send on specific date and time box checked,
arrows are working only when I click to hour or minute. But even I select
one of them, arrows are working once only, they loose focus after first
click.
--
Thanks and Bye,
Marek Mikus
Czech support of The Bat!
Hello Volker,
Wednesday, April 29, 2009, 12:25:10, you wrote:
A few more thoughts brought me to this real flexible solution (see
attachment).
Thank you for some nice thoughts!
The postponed sending dialog is the graphical editor for the small textual
argument of the %POSTPONE macro, e.g. “+2h
Hello Volker,
Wednesday, April 29, 2009, 18:42:22, you wrote:
Did you see my latest draft for the dialog?
Yes, this dialog have made a valuable contribution to further design of the
dialog that you may see in the .19 beta.
--
Best regards,
Maxim Masiutin
Ritlabs SRL
Hello Volker,
Monday, April 27, 2009, 0:00:35, you wrote:
The arrows of the Time box do not work (see attachment), but you can
type a different time in the corresponding field.
This is a behaviour of a standard windows calendar control. Do
you know other software when it works not the same
Hello Volker,
Wednesday, April 29, 2009, 18:50:01, you wrote:
And that has nearly nothing to do with the [More]-Button. So please
think about my dialog draft. :-)
We will probably remove the more button when it is not needed and/or replace
it with another control, like in the attached image.
On Friday, May 1, 2009, 7:58:38 PM, Maxim Masiutin wrote:
You were right that we've chosen inappropriate phrases, may be in beta .19 it
will get better.
when I try to choose a specific date and time, and tick the time and
use the arrows to scroll it only allows me to scroll one hour, or
[Reply to: »Volker Ahrendt« · 2009-04-29 · 01:05 h (CET)]
The problem is in this case the user will have to click the GUI for
each for the message sent, like in Outlook. We want to give an
option to to configure the postponed sending autmatically for every
message, so the user will simply
Hello Volker,
Tuesday, April 28, 2009, 12:52:32 PM, you wrote:
Okay, leave the info, that the postponed message will be sent on …
But the test section – even for messages that are automatically
created by sorting office filters or by mass mailing quick templates –
is IMHO of no real need.
[Reply to: »Maxim Masiutin« · 2009-04-29 · 15:59 h (CET)]
Moin, Maxim!
But the test section – even for messages that are automatically
created by sorting office filters or by mass mailing quick templates –
is IMHO of no real need.
That's why we have implemented the More button. Those who do
[Reply to: »Volker Ahrendt« · 2009-04-29 · 17:42 h (CET)]
[Reply to: »Maxim Masiutin« · 2009-04-29 · 15:59 h (CET)]
But the test section – even for messages that are automatically
created by sorting office filters or by mass mailing quick
templates – is IMHO of no real need.
That's why we
I can't believe so much time is being devoted to the Postponed Sending
dialogue subject. Is there not more important issues?..
Steve.H
Current beta is 4.1.11.18 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat
[Reply to: »Steve Harris« · 2009-04-29 · 17:56 h (CET)]
I can't believe so much time is being devoted to the Postponed
Sending dialogue subject. Is there not more important issues?..
IMAP? Drafts folder? Number of attachments? … Um, no!
Cheers!
VA
- --
Direct eMail without [tbb
Hi Steve,
on Wed, 29 Apr 2009 16:56:20 +0100GMT (29.04.2009, 17:56 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:
SH I can't believe so much time is being devoted to the Postponed Sending
SH dialogue subject. Is there not more important issues?..
I agree with you here completely.
How about proper S/MIME
miércoles, 29 abr 2009 at 11:25, it seems you wrote:
A few more thoughts brought me to this real flexible solution (see
attachment).
Your draft02 gets my vote. But I think radiobuttons should not be on
the left of the other. They should be below the previous one.
--
/\/
Hello Mau,
Monday, April 27, 2009, 2:03:40, you wrote:
Hold for...
( ) Hours ( ) Minutes ( ) Seconds
... and then send.
Your idea to use the tail ...and then send is excellent! But it gives another
complication. The user can combine hold over (2) days and use specific time
8:00 for,
Hello Mau,
Monday, April 27, 2009, 2:03:40, you wrote:
So, my suggestion would be to make the
title be 'Postponed/Scheduled Sending'.
This is a nice idea. At least The Bat! uses it's scheduler and creates events
to send the messages.
--
Best regards,
Maxim Masiutin
[Reply to: »Maxim Masiutin« · 2009-04-28 · 10:54 h (CET)]
Moin, Maxim!
Hold for...
( ) Hours ( ) Minutes ( ) Seconds
... and then send.
Your idea to use the tail ...and then send is excellent!
+1
But it gives another complication. The user can combine hold over
(2) days and use specific
message April 30,
8:00 h. – Where is the problem?
The problem is in this case the user will have to click the GUI for each for
the message sent, like in Outlook. We want to give an option to to configure
the postponed sending autmatically for every message, so the user will simply
press send button
Hello Maxim,
Hold for...
( ) Hours ( ) Minutes ( ) Seconds
... and then send.
Your idea to use the tail ...and then send is excellent!
Thank you :(
But it gives another complication. The user can combine hold over
(2) days and use specific time 8:00 for, example, which means that
the
Hello Maxim,
So, my suggestion would be to make the title be 'Postponed/Scheduled
Sending'.
This is a nice idea. At least The Bat! uses it's scheduler and creates
events to send the messages.
Well, with this one, it is 3 beers in total that you owe me ;-)
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech
Hello Volker,
But it gives another complication. The user can combine hold over
(2) days and use specific time 8:00 for, example, which means
that the message will be send in 8:00 in two days after today.
This may be a nice try, but please keep it simple:
Either you want to send a message
Hello Volker,
Monday, April 27, 2009, 23:36:02, you wrote:
I would suggest to remove most of the More part at the bottom of the
dialog. = See attachments.
Why do you suggest to remove it?
--
Best regards,
Maxim Masiutin
Ritlabs SRL
http://www.ritlabs.com/
Hello Roger,
Monday, April 27, 2009, 7:40:48, you wrote:
It is not clear to me just what is the need for Test against an arbitrary
date and time in the future.
This can be useful, for example, for messages that are automatically created by
sorting office filters or by mass mailing quick
[Reply to: »Maxim Masiutin« · 2009-04-28 · 11:31 h (CET)]
Moin, Maxim!
I would suggest to remove most of the More part at the bottom of the
dialog. = See attachments.
Why do you suggest to remove it?
Okay, leave the info, that the postponed message will be sent on …
But the test section –
Dienstag, 28. April 2009 at 11:20, Volker Ahrendt wrote:
Either you want to send a message in x days/hours/minutes or at a
specific time. But please do not mix it up and confuse the user.
Instead of the mentioned above, one can say: Send message April 30,
8:00 h. – Where is the problem?
+1
Dienstag, 28. April 2009 at 11:31, Maxim Masiutin wrote:
I would suggest to remove most of the More part at the bottom of the
dialog. = See attachments.
That is enough (until i understand why to have more than that):
http://www.de2all.de/thebat/screen78.png
--
With kind Regards
Jens Franik
[Reply to: »Maxim Masiutin« · 2009-04-28 · 11:31 h (CET)]
Moin, Maxim!
I would suggest to remove most of the More part at the bottom of the
dialog. = See attachments.
Why do you suggest to remove it?
Okay, leave the info, that the postponed message will be sent on …
But the test section –
Hello Jens,
Monday, April 27, 2009, 22:52:00, you wrote:
Yes, exept of the lower part with the compare against date..
How do you suggest to improve it?
--
Best regards,
Maxim Masiutin
Ritlabs SRL
http://www.ritlabs.com/
[Reply to: »Maxim Masiutin« · 2009-04-28 · 11:40 h (CET)]
Moin, Maxim!
The problem is in this case the user will have to click the GUI for
each for the message sent, like in Outlook. We want to give an
option to to configure the postponed sending autmatically for every
message, so the user
Sonntag, 26. April 2009 at 11:06, Maxim Masiutin wrote:
Do you think that the new Postponed Sending dialogue is easier to understand
Yes, exept of the lower part with the compare against date..
--
With kind Regards
Jens Franik
mailto:je...@gmx.de
Picture of me? X-Rogue http://www.de2all.de
[Reply to: »Jens Franik« · 2009-04-27 · 21:52 h (CET)]
Moin, Jens!
Sonntag, 26. April 2009 at 11:06, Maxim Masiutin wrote:
Do you think that the new Postponed Sending dialogue is easier to
understand
Yes, exept of the lower part with the compare against date..
I would suggest to remove
[Reply to: »Maxim Masiutin« · 2009-04-26 · 11:06 h (CET)]
Moin, Maxim!
Do you think that the new Postponed Sending dialogue is easier to
understand or even harder to understand? There were some TBBETA
subscribers that have found the old one very perplexing. We need
your feedback.
The arrows
Hello Tbbeta,
Do you think that the new Postponed Sending dialogue is easier to understand
or even harder to understand? There were some TBBETA subscribers that have
found the old one very perplexing. We need your feedback.
--
Best regards,
Maxim Masiutin
Ritlabs
Hi,
For me the Postponed Sending Dialogue menu in 118 make perfect sense
although I can't say I'd ever use it myself ;-)
Are the attachment icons on the fix list?
Regards
Steve Harris
MM Hello Tbbeta,
MM
MM Do you think that the new Postponed Sending dialogue is easier
MM to understand
Hi Max,
Do you think that the new Postponed Sending dialogue is easier to
understand or even harder to understand? There were some TBBETA subscribers
that have found the old one very perplexing. We need your feedback.
I had to look in my dictionary what 'Postponed' ment. :-)
With f.i
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
