Dear Ira,
--->>> Ira / Saturday 05-May-18, 06:29:20
Quiet
>> Is it "very quiet?" or "very quiet!" ;)
> Quiet in a beta section usually means it's working, a good
> thing!
You have a point ;)
--
best regards | Using The Bat! Versi
Dear Ethan,
--->>> Ethan J. Mings / Saturday 05-May-18, 06:06:29
Quiet
>> Is it "very quiet?" or "very quiet!" ;)
> I suspect the RIT Team is busy at work on the next version of the Bat.
> Usually
> find when it is this quiet, they are b
Hello Eddie,
Friday, May 4, 2018, 3:47:05 PM, you wrote:
> Is it "very quiet?" or "very quiet!" ;)
Quiet in a beta section usually means it's working, a good
thing!
-- Ira
Current beta is 8.3.0.3 | 'Using TB
Hello Eddie,
Friday, May 4, 2018, 6:47:05 PM, you wrote:
> Is it "very quiet?" or "very quiet!" ;)
I suspect the RIT Team is busy at work on the next version of the Bat. Usually
find when it is this quiet, they are busy doing some good work.
Let's wait and see what
Hi All,
Is it "very quiet?" or "very quiet!" ;)
--
best regards | Using The Bat! Version 7.4.16.13 (BETA) (32-bit)
Eddie | on Windows 7 6.1
| Build 7601 Service Pack 1-BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK---
Hello All,
I've just put a note at the BT Wish page
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5441 , where the Drafts folder
proposal is described and supported by notes from many TB! users.
My note addresses the need for a Drafts folder as it relates to blind
and partially sighted people who use
Bonjour Mary,
Le dimanche 18 décembre 2005 à 16:37:47, vous écriviez :
MB Hello All,
MB I've just put a note at the BT Wish page
MB https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5441 , where the Drafts folder
MB proposal is described and supported by notes from many TB! users.
MB My note addresses
On Sunday, 18 December 2005 at 16:37 Mary Bull wrote:
Comments?
You got it, Madame! :)
--
Manuel, http://www.manuel-breitfeld.de
Current beta is 3.63.14 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Hello Claude!
On Sunday, December 18, 2005, 9:55 AM, you wrote:
MB I've just put a note at the BT Wish page
MB https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5441 , where the Drafts folder
MB proposal is described and supported by notes from many TB! users.
MB My note addresses the need for a Drafts
Hello Manuel!
On Sunday, December 18, 2005, 10:08 AM, you wrote:
Comments?
You got it, Madame! :)
Wonderful, Sir!!
So could you please put a further supporting note at
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5441 ?
TIA
:thankyou:
--
Best regards,
Please support the wish for a 'Draft'
Bonjour Mary,
Le dimanche 18 décembre 2005 à 17:11:22, vous écriviez :
MB Hello Claude!
MB On Sunday, December 18, 2005, 9:55 AM, you wrote:
MB I've just put a note at the BT Wish page
MB https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5441 , where the Drafts folder
MB proposal is described and
Hello Claude!
On Sunday, December 18, 2005, 10:25 AM, you wrote:
Oh! ... Mary ... Thanks ...
MB My pleasure.
All the pleasure is for me ...
MB Claude, do you have the capability to put a supporting note of
MB your own on this part of the issue at the BT Wish page?
On Sunday, 18 December 2005 at 17:15 Mary Bull wrote:
So could you please put a further supporting note at
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5441 ?
TIA
My pleasure. Wish you a nice Sunday. ;)
--
Manuel, http://www.manuel-breitfeld.de
Bonjour Mary,
Le dimanche 18 décembre 2005 à 17:44:10, vous écriviez :
MB Hello Claude!
MB On Sunday, December 18, 2005, 10:25 AM, you wrote:
Oh! ... Mary ... Thanks ...
MB My pleasure.
All the pleasure is for me ...
MB Claude, do you have the capability to put a supporting note of
MB
Hello Claude!
On Sunday, December 18, 2005, 10:59 AM, you wrote:
MB But might be a good idea to reply to Stefan Tanurkov's comment there,
MB in which he said:
MB MS Active Accessibility is already supported and draft messages are
MB pronounced as praked for blind users, so 0015145 is not a valid
Hello Manuel!
On Sunday, December 18, 2005, 10:55 AM, you wrote:
So could you please put a further supporting note at
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5441 ?
TIA
My pleasure. ...
Thanks a mil. I've seen it--well expressed and brought me a smile.
Wish you a nice Sunday. ;)
You too!
Bonjour Mary,
Le dimanche 18 décembre 2005 à 18:08:04, vous écriviez :
MB Hello Claude!
MB On Sunday, December 18, 2005, 10:59 AM, you wrote:
MB But might be a good idea to reply to Stefan Tanurkov's comment there,
MB in which he said:
MB MS Active Accessibility is already supported and draft
Hello Claude!
On Sunday, December 18, 2005, 11:17 AM, you wrote:
MB I've received the BT notification and read your note at
MB https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5441.
MB It's well expressed, and brings me much pleasure. :)
I always try to do my best but sometimes I have difficulties to
On Sun, 18 Dec 2005, at 18:17:17 [GMT +0100] (which was 18:17 where I
live) Claude Renaud wrote:
...snipped
unfortunately I'm french
Unfortunately I am Dutch, do you want to change ;-)
Your knowledge of the English language is pretty good as far as I can
see...
I wish I could write French
Hello Henk,
unfortunately I'm french
Unfortunately I am Dutch, do you want to change ;-)
What do you guys mean unfortunately? Would you rather be Brits or
Americans? Puagg!! ;-)
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.62.14 on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack
Hello MAU!
On Sunday, December 18, 2005, 1:21 PM, you wrote:
unfortunately I'm french
Unfortunately I am Dutch, do you want to change ;-)
What do you guys mean unfortunately? Would you rather be Brits or
Americans? Puagg!! ;-)
:rofl2: Unfortunately I'm Southern Dialect ...
LOL
--
Best
Does any one know how to get SpamPal to work with TB! to collect mail
from GMail?
I ask 'cos my settings in TB! for my gmail account are
non(-pop3)-standard. I connect on port 995 using TLS. I can't seem to
see anything that allows me to set the connection type. I'm happy to
set it up to not use
Hi,
Chris Weaven wrote:
from what I've heard, IMAP is lacking somewhat. As I am entirely
IMAP based, I'm in no great hurry to test in this case.
ACK(*). New GUI(+) or no new GUI, working IMAP(#) is what I want.
Regards,
Markus
* Acknowledge[d] (antonym: NACK (not acknowledged))
+ Graphical
Hello Peter,
A reminder of what Peter Fjelsten on TBBETA typed on:
22 February 2005 at 23:39:04 GMT +0100
PF Which apparently has a problem with sig delimiters...
We know about that, and I've been in contact with Poco support a long
while ago about it. I just had a post from them telling
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
IMHO, this level of Alpha version should never go public, not
even to this list. By releasing a program in this embryonic state,
there is a chance that it will disappoint a lot of people.
They're damned if they do and damned if they don't.
- --
David,
On 22-02-2005 23:52, you [DE] wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
DE I am sorry but it was released a alpha release.
DE Yea and ??
I did not write what you answering. You cut out my reply to that
message.
That being said, I don't mind Ritlabs releasing an Alpha to the general
public
Hello David Calvarese everyone else,
on 23-Feb-2005 at 00:33 you (David Calvarese) wrote:
and the GnuPG support via Enigmail is better than the PGP support in TB!
as well
Then why's your message signed inline and not PGP/MIME? :-)
--
Best regards,
Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
Hello David Calvarese everyone else,
on 23-Feb-2005 at 00:33 you (David Calvarese) wrote:
and the GnuPG support via Enigmail is better than the PGP support in TB!
as well
Then why's your message signed inline
Het was op woensdag 23 februari 2005 om 18:17 uur dat jij iets schreef over
'Quiet?' :
Hallo Alexander,
and the GnuPG support via Enigmail is better than the PGP support in TB!
as well
ASK Then why's your message signed inline and not PGP/MIME? :-)
that's because it's kinda difficult
Hello David Calvarese everyone else,
on 23-Feb-2005 at 18:35 you (David Calvarese) wrote:
Then why's your message signed inline and not PGP/MIME? :-)
Because I prefer inline signing over PGP/MIME. :) Enigmail can do
PGP/MIME as well.
Its the year 2005. I find that PGP gibberish is totally
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
Hello David Calvarese everyone else,
on 23-Feb-2005 at 18:35 you (David Calvarese) wrote:
Then why's your message signed inline and not PGP/MIME? :-)
Because I prefer inline signing over PGP/MIME. :) Enigmail
Hello David Calvarese everyone else,
on 23-Feb-2005 at 19:05 you (David Calvarese) wrote:
There is 'Inline HTML'. It's what Outlook Express uses by default. :)
You know what I meant.
Btw. now I know whats so ugly about your messages and why it jumped in my
face so much - you have no sig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
Hello David Calvarese everyone else,
on 23-Feb-2005 at 19:05 you (David Calvarese) wrote:
There is 'Inline HTML'. It's what Outlook Express uses by default. :)
You know what I meant.
Btw. now I know whats
Hi David,
On 23/02/2005 01:28 PM, you wrote:
I'm working on that... I'm pretty new to Thunderbird and I haven't
figured out how to do that yet. :)
Other than compatibility, I struggle to think of a meaningful reason for
using inline PGP signatures. If you send PGP/MIME signatures to this
AC Martin wrote:
Hi David,
On 23/02/2005 01:28 PM, you wrote:
I'm working on that... I'm pretty new to Thunderbird and I haven't
figured out how to do that yet. :)
Other than compatibility, I struggle to think of a meaningful reason for
using inline PGP signatures. If you send PGP/MIME
Hello TBBETA,
Surprisingly quiet on here under the circumstances isn't it?
--
Tony.
Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10
:gentoo:
www.gentoo.org
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep
On Tuesday, February 22, 2005 @ 1:33:17 PM [-0700], Tony Boom wrote:
Surprisingly quiet on here under the circumstances isn't it?
I think it's because we're working with an Alpha...and from the emails
so far it's a challenging Alpha. I would guess that many have not
installed it yet
Het was op dinsdag 22 februari 2005 om 22:33 uur dat jij iets schreef over
'Quiet?' :
Hallo Tony,
TB Surprisingly quiet on here under the circumstances isn't it?
uh we've all together crashed. :-
--
groeten,
Cees
Bad spellers of the world UNTIE
Hi Matt,
The original quoted text below was written on 22/02/2005 21:37 my local
time;
I would guess that many have not installed it yet and are awaiting
the single file available as soon as the Alpha stage is finished
version...
I'm one of those. I've 55 unread messages relating to the new Alpha
Salutation TBBETA,
On 22 February 2005, at 21:33:17 + (which was 21:33 where I live) Tony
Boom graced us with these comments
Surprisingly quiet on here under the circumstances isn't it?
sarcasm
No one can get it to work. :)
/sarcasm
--
Cheers
Hello David,
A reminder of what David Elliott on TBBETA typed on:
22 February 2005 at 22:51:27 GMT +0100
DE No one can get it to work.
I'm waiting for some rather important court documents from Social Services
so I reverted back to a more stable version. Not only that, I'm proud to
still
Hello Tony,
On Tuesday, February 22, 2005 at 21:33:17 GMT + (which was
22:33:17 where I live), Tony Boom wrote and made these valuable points
on the subject of Quiet?:
Hello TBBETA,
Surprisingly quiet on here under the circumstances isn't it?
..maybe everybody is shocked...;-)
IMHO
Hello TBBETA,
Rumour believes that on 22 February 2005, at 21:56:13 + (which was
21:56 where I live) Tony Boom wrote
A reminder of what David Elliott on TBBETA typed on: 22 February 2005 at
22:51:27 GMT +0100
No one can get it to work.
I'm waiting for some rather important court
Salutation TBBETA,
It was foretold that on 22 February 2005, at 23:03:10 +0100 (which was
22:03 where I live) Dick H wrote and made these points
Surprisingly quiet on here under the circumstances isn't it?
IMHO, this level of Alpha version should never go public, not even to
this list.
I
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 23:03:10 +0100, Dick H wrote:
By releasing a program in this embryonic state, there is a chance
that it will disappoint a lot of people.
Well I've got bored waiting so I'm playing with Poco.
--
Tony.
:gentoo:
www.gentoo.org
Het was op dinsdag 22 februari 2005 om 23:28 uur dat jij iets schreef over
'Quiet?' :
Hallo Tony,
By releasing a program in this embryonic state, there is a chance
that it will disappoint a lot of people.
TB Well I've got bored waiting so I'm playing with Poco.
poco is a toy for children
Tony,
On 22-02-2005 23:28, you [TB] wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
TB Well I've got bored waiting so I'm playing with Poco.
TB
TB --
TB Tony.
TB
TB :gentoo:
TB www.gentoo.org
Which apparently has a problem with sig delimiters... :)
--
greeting Best regards /greeting
author Peter
David,
On 22-02-2005 23:24, you [DE] wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
IMHO, this level of Alpha version should never go public, not even to
this list.
DE I don't agree here. It was advertised as an Alpha release.
OK as per BS standards (yes, I have recently been ISEB certified
software
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 23:36:48 +0100, Cees wrote:
poco is a toy for children... :-(
That's why I'm playing with it :)
--
Tony.
:gentoo:
www.gentoo.org
Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
Hi TBBETA,
On 22 February 2005, at 23:37:31 +0100 (which was 22:37 where I live) Peter
Fjelsten wrote
IMHO, this level of Alpha version should never go public, not even to
this list.
I don't agree here. It was advertised as an Alpha release.
OK as per BS standards (yes, I have recently
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Tony Boom wrote:
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 23:03:10 +0100, Dick H wrote:
By releasing a program in this embryonic state, there is a chance
that it will disappoint a lot of people.
Well I've got bored waiting so I'm playing with Poco.
Poco's a
Het was op dinsdag 22 februari 2005 om 23:39 uur dat jij iets schreef over
'Quiet?' :
Hallo Tony,
poco is a toy for children... :-(
TB That's why I'm playing with it :)
I'm speachless. you've got me there... :-))
--
regards,
Cees
Uh, MC, who'd WANNA touch
52 matches
Mail list logo
