Hello all,
Thursday, July 28, 2005, Mary Bull wrote:
I am soo behind-the-times! Thanks a mil for the support!! :)
Well, when Diman Pavlov changed the status from Verify-Fail back to
Verify-Wait, the version it says it is fixed in is conserved as v.
3.51.10.
Possibly that's a typo or an
Hello Marek!
On Thursday, July 28, 2005, 2:32 AM, you wrote:
Possibly that's a typo or an oversight. It is most certainly
*NOT* fixed in v. 3.51.10. :(
I guess we just have to wait for the next beta release, to see if it
really is fixed.
latest available version number in BT is 3.51.10,
Hello Ian!
On Wednesday, July 27, 2005, 5:49 PM, you wrote:
It appears that for the smiley to quote, it must have printable white
space after it. It does not quote if there is nothing after it, or if
there is just a carriage return and line feed only after it.
Can anyone confirm :(
Hello all,
Thursday, July 28, 2005, Ian A. White wrote:
I received an update to the BT item advising that this bug had been
fixed, but in reality it has not.
BT report was fixed today, latest build was released yesterday, You
must expect this bugfix in next build, not in previous.
--
Bye
Hoi Ian
If the smiley is the last item on a line and you select that line for quoting,
it depends on what you select as to whether it will selectively quote or not.
If you drag the cursor so that the smiley at the end of the line is just
selected, it will not quote.
If you select the line
Hello Marek!
On Wednesday, July 27, 2005, 6:04 PM, you wrote:
I received an update to the BT item advising that this bug had been
fixed, but in reality it has not.
BT report was fixed today, latest build was released yesterday, You
must expect this bugfix in next build, not in previous.
Hello Natasha!
On Wednesday, July 27, 2005, 6:08 PM, you wrote:
Can anyone confirm :(
Absolutely. In addition, as I wrote in my note attached to the BT,
any smiley on the last line will not be quoted unless another
line/paragraph below the one with the smiley/s is selected. But only
if the
Hello Ian!
On Wednesday, July 27, 2005, 6:12 PM, you wrote:
MB If you would like to, perhaps you will add another supporting note, in
MB regard to the bug's still being present in v. 3.51.10. I would very
MB much appreciate your doing that.
MB http://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=3889
I
Hoi Mary
Natasha, if you have the time, could you put a further note to that effect at
http://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=3889
Already done. :realtardis:
--
Groetjes
Natasha
The Bat! 3.51.10 Pro on Windows XP Pro 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
Hello Natasha!
On Wednesday, July 27, 2005, 6:19 PM, you wrote:
Natasha, if you have the time, could you put a further note to that effect at
http://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=3889
Already done. :realtardis:
I am soo behind-the-times! Thanks a mil for the support!! :)
Well, when Diman
Hoi Mary
I guess we just have to wait for the next beta release, to see if it really is
fixed.
I've just checked the daily build link: this still retrieves 3.51.9 - so no help
there. The change log (whichcanalsobefoundat
Hello Natasha!
Thanks for this welcome Private Mail!
On Wednesday, July 27, 2005, 6:51 PM, you wrote:
I guess we just have to wait for the next beta release, to see if it really
is
fixed.
I've just checked the daily build link: this still retrieves 3.51.9 - so no
help
there. The
Hello Mary!
On Wednesday, July 27, 2005, 7:07 PM, you wrote:
Thanks for this welcome Private Mail!
On Wednesday, July 27, 2005, 6:51 PM, you wrote:
I guess we just have to wait for the next beta release, to see if it really
is
fixed.
I've just checked the daily build link: this still
Hoi Mary
Well, I guess I have a messed-up filter. Wasn't a PM. And I'm getting a little
tired at the end of a long day, so I failed to double-check my To field before
sending.
Happens to us all at one time or another.
Apologies to Natasha and to the list.
None necessary to me, and I'm
Hello Natasha!
On Wednesday, July 27, 2005, 7:26 PM, you wrote:
Well, I guess I have a messed-up filter. Wasn't a PM. And I'm getting a
little
tired at the end of a long day, so I failed to double-check my To field
before
sending.
Happens to us all at one time or another.
Apologies to
On 7/28/05, Mary Bull [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Natasha!
Come on, girls, please take it offline already. That's four messages
so far, and I am starting to feel like a captive voyeur. :yech:
--
jaywalker
Windows XP Pro SP2 and The Bat! Pro (No OTFE) 3.51.10
Can anyone help with this bug that has been present for me during ALL
the 3.5 betas and the RC. I run a 3 pane window with message pre
viewing. If I double click on a message though it fails to open in a
full window, instead an EMPTY window is launched with No Message Loaded
shown. the same thing
Tuesday, May 31, 2005, 9:12:17 AM, you wrote:
Hi Chris
On Tuesday, May 31, 2005 9:27:11 AM you wrote:
Can anyone help with this bug that has been present for me during ALL
the 3.5 betas and the RC. I run a 3 pane window with message pre
viewing. If I double click on a message though it
Hello Chris,
I am wondering if the time element in opening the full view pane is
allowing the message to be marked as read?
Why don't you (at least for a test) go to Account/Properties/Options and
deselect the Mark the message as read when it is read for... and
manually mark the messages as
Tuesday, May 31, 2005, 11:27:53 AM, you wrote:
Hello Chris,
I am wondering if the time element in opening the full view pane is
allowing the message to be marked as read?
Why don't you (at least for a test) go to Account/Properties/Options and
deselect the Mark the message as read when it
Tuesday, May 31, 2005, 11:53:01 AM, you wrote:
Tuesday, May 31, 2005, 11:27:53 AM, you wrote:
Hello Chris,
I am wondering if the time element in opening the full view pane is
allowing the message to be marked as read?
Why don't you (at least for a test) go to Account/Properties/Options
Hello Chris,
I consider that a bug, whilst focus remains on that message it should
still be openable in the main window with a double click or Open, in
fact this should be possible whether the message is read or unread,
surely?
I don't consider this a bug, it is just a timing issue. When you
Hello Chris,
Tuesday, May 31, 2005, 12:53:01 PM, among other things, you wrote:
CW I would still like messages to be marked
CW automatically as read, with the option of a double click opening it in a
CW main window if I so desire.
Why not use the new feature of the 'Space' shortcut key which
Hello.
I was trying to find a good use for the macro syntax that I seem to
have overlooked: the %paranthesis(syntax), so to speak.
It seems that the parantheses are evaluated AFTER the quotes. And,
without quotes, only the first word of the parantheses content is
used, for single-parameter
Hello MaXxX,
Monday, October 25, 2004, 8:40:06 AM, you wrote:
I was trying to find a good use for the macro syntax that I seem to
have overlooked: the %paranthesis(syntax), so to speak.
To quote the help file:
Note: The Bat! version 2 introduces a new syntax for macros: it is
now possible to
On Monday, October 25, 2004, at 9:41:39 AM, Alexander S. Kunz spewed
forth what is to be beheld below:
So its either parenthesis *OR* quotation marks that keep paramenters
apart. I can't go thru all your examples but maybe you want to check
them against this rule...
I know how to use the
Hello MaXxX,
Monday, October 25, 2004, 12:37:47 PM, you wrote:
So its either parenthesis *OR* quotation marks that keep
paramenters apart. I can't go thru all your examples but maybe you
want to check them against this rule...
I know how to use the macros, in both forms. I was not asking
Hello Alexander,
Monday, October 25, 2004, 1:28:09 PM, you wrote:
also
I meant could.
--
Best regards,
Alexandermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current beta is 3.0.2.1 Beta/1 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
Hello tbbeta200409203600,
Monday, October 25, 2004, 1:55:23 PM, you wrote:
Your'e getting somthing wrong here: As you stated earlier you *may*
*always* use parenthesis instead of quotation marks:
That statement is not from me but from TB's helpfile. RTFM.
And there (in the friendly manual)
Hello Xenocryst!
On Monday, October 25, 2004, 7:42 AM, you wrote:
txxn You can vainly argue whether -- as I quoted from TFM --
txxn | new syntax for macros: it is now possible to use brackets instead
txxn | of =...
txxn means implies possible to always use, which makes a lot of sense, or
txxn
Dear Alexander,
@25-Oct-2004, 14:16 +0200 (25-Oct 13:16 UK time) Alexander S. Kunz
[ASK] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Your'e getting somthing wrong here: As you stated earlier you *may*
*always* use parenthesis instead of quotation marks:
ASK That statement is not from me but from TB's
Hello tbbeta200409203600,
Monday, October 25, 2004, 2:42:37 PM, you wrote:
That's your interpretation -- and it's plain wrong. TFM does *NOT*
state %Wrapped should behave differently when used with parenthesis
or quotationmarks, respectively.
Why don't you SIMPLY open the helpfile instead of
Hello Mary,
Monday, October 25, 2004, 3:10:05 PM, you wrote:
P.S. I wish that Alexander Kunz would quit using sarcasm and would
refrain from cursing in the body of his messages, or anywhere else.
Wish on. I write my mails the way I like, and I won't let myself be
teached by you again, and
Hello Marck,
Monday, October 25, 2004, 3:20:10 PM, you wrote:
%WRAPPED(%COOKIE)
I use both and both work.
I tried that only a couple of days ago, exactly the same way Maxxx
tries to use it, and I stumbled exactly across the problems he has...
--
Best regards,
Alexander
Dear Alexander,
@25-Oct-2004, 15:28 +0200 (25-Oct 14:28 UK time) Alexander S. Kunz
[ASK] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck:
%WRAPPED(%COOKIE)
I use both and both work.
ASK I tried that only a couple of days ago, exactly the same way
ASK Maxxx tries to use it, and I stumbled exactly
Hello Marck,
Monday, October 25, 2004, 3:38:01 PM, you wrote:
See that last sentence? The converse is that quotation marks *are
required* for more than single word macro parameters.
Well, I never looked at it that way because it was so obvious... to
me, ahem. :-)
FWIW, what Maxxx wants to do
Hello tbbeta200409203600,
Monday, October 25, 2004, 3:54:20 PM, you wrote:
Your assumption that this means you may not use parenthesis in
single argument macros is still wrong.
I never said that, and I never assumed that. I simply understand that
the %WRAPPED macro is an exception, thats why
Hello Marck!
On Monday, October 25, 2004, 9:06 AM, you wrote:
MDP We know you are only trying to help, but we would rather that any
MDP offence caused by the posting of another list member be taken up
MDP either off-list or (preferably) as a plea to
MDP [EMAIL PROTECTED] for divine intervention.
Hello Mary!
On Monday, October 25, 2004 at 3:10:05 PM you wrote:
And that MaXxX's feature request is probably needed--a clarification
of the Macro's effects.
A wish I wholeheartedly agree with. From what I've read in this thread
- before it gets juicy - Maxxx pointed out not a bug or some
Hello Alexander!
On Monday, October 25, 2004 at 3:27:37 PM you wrote:
Wish on. I write my mails the way I like, and I won't let myself be
teached by you again, and again in public, remember that. Thank you.
Sorry, I don't see teaching in Mary's, just a behest to make it
easier for her to read
Hello Mary!
On Monday, October 25, 2004 at 4:26:06 PM you wrote:
I apologize, and I will make this my practice in the future.
Oops, sorry for the other comment by me; didn't know that a member's
wish for clarity and easier access of other's posts is moderating.
--
Dierk Haasis
:Dierk: Copy
Hello Dierk!
On Monday, October 25, 2004, 11:55 AM, you wrote:
MB And that MaXxX's feature request is probably needed--a clarification
mb of the Macro's effects.
DH A wish I wholeheartedly agree with. From what I've read in this thread
DH - before it gets juicy - Maxxx pointed out not a bug or
Hello Mary,
Monday, October 25, 2004, 6:10:05 AM, you wrote:
P.S.2 Translated into English, does Xenocryst mean strange
crystal?
In geology a xenocryst is a crystal foreign to the igneous rock in
which it occurs.
--
Thanks,
Terry
Using the Bat! 3.0.1 RC4
under Windows XP Service Pack 2
Hello Dierk!
On Monday, October 25, 2004, 12:02 PM, you wrote:
MB I apologize, and I will make this my practice in the future.
DH Oops, sorry for the other comment by me; didn't know that a
DH member's wish for clarity and easier access of other's posts is
DH moderating.
Of course, I did not
Hello Dierk!
On Monday, October 25, 2004, 11:57 AM, you wrote:
ASK Wish on. I write my mails the way I like, and I won't let myself
ASK be teached by you again, and again in public, remember that.
ASK Thank you.
DH Sorry, I don't see teaching in Mary's, just a behest to make it
DH easier for
Hello Terry!
On Monday, October 25, 2004, 12:11 PM, you wrote:
MB P.S.2 Translated into English, does Xenocryst mean strange
MB crystal?
TGM In geology a xenocryst is a crystal foreign to the igneous rock
TGM in which it occurs.
Ah. In some instances, then, a very valuable gem.
Thank you so
On Monday, October 25, 2004, at 7:19:25 PM, Mary Bull jumped on the
stage, took a mike and sang:
I hope he will write his feature-request up formally at BT, so that I
can put a note of support to it.
I am currently at it.
.
Done. Together with a grammar definition. 0.5% chance for it to
Hello Mary,
Monday, October 25, 2004, 10:40:35 AM, you wrote:
Ah. In some instances, then, a very valuable gem.
It would be safe to say only a geologist would find consider a
xenocryst of value but even someone who adored rocks would have
trouble calling it a gem.
--
Thanks,
Terry
Using
Hello Dierk Haasis everyone else
25-Okt-2004 18:57, you wrote:
Sorry, I don't see teaching in Mary's, just a behest to make it
easier for her to read what you meant instead of what she has to
interpret.
Just to get this straight - where is the need to interpret anything?
I pointed out to
On Monday, October 25, 2004, at 8:59:50 PM, MaXxX wrote the following
words:
Done. Together with a grammar definition. 0.5% chance for it to be
used, even if I implement it myself and present to Ritlabs on a silver
platter, but what the hell, my brains needed a jog. :P
Hello MaXxX!
On Monday, October 25, 2004, 1:59 PM, you wrote:
MB I hope he will write his feature-request up formally at BT, so
MB that I can put a note of support to it.
...
M Done.
Just now added my supporting note at
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=3980
--
Best regards,
Mary
Hello Alexander!
On Monday, October 25, 2004 at 9:17:03 PM you wrote:
Just to get this straight - where is the need to interpret anything?
Her PS was about ironic (she wrote sarcastic) stylistc devices, like
the comment about Maxxx at last reading something someone else wrote.
--
Dierk
Hello Dierk Haasis everyone else
25-Okt-2004 21:34, you wrote:
Just to get this straight - where is the need to interpret anything?
Her PS was about ironic (she wrote sarcastic) stylistc devices, like
the comment about Maxxx at last reading something someone else wrote.
Anyone is welcome
Every time I close beta 26 I get a Dr Watson error:
acc violation 0x005 Address 0x00403c
Doesn't seem to self close if left open for some time, inactive though,
anymore.
Thanks.
PLEASE add sticky folder settings, I REALLY want to go to some folders
with all messages showing, some with
Hello,
1 Jan 2002, 8:12:58 AM, Marek Mikus wrote:
DAC It still won't show common folders, so it's no use to me.
MM close TB, create empty file named account.cfg in MAIL directory and
MM open TB.
It *does* work! Thanks a lot!
And it has some interesting features, applying on common
Hello all,
TF (There seem to be people who have downloaded the unannounced beta.
TF Some users never learn.)
Well, I'm a Kamikaze! :-) and it's _my_ choice
DAC It still won't show common folders, so it's no use to me.
close TB, create empty file named account.cfg in MAIL directory and
open
This message: 01/01/2002 18:56 GMT.
Hello Marek,
A reminder of what Marek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) typed on:
01 January 2002 at 15:12:58 GMT +0100
MM close TB, create empty file named account.cfg in MAIL directory and
MM open TB.
Well it works for me... Thank you very much Marek.
--
Hello Thomas,
On Mon, 31 Dec 2001 11:04:42 +0800 (31.12.2001 08:04 my local time)
you wrote about Window Focus Problem Still Present in Beta 20,
at least in part:
TF You mean a bugfix in *beta/21*? Without an official announcement and
TF changelog from Ritlabs? Nice try! ;-)
It's my
On 31 Dec 2001, 3:34:00 PM, Alexander Leschinsky wrote:
TF (There seem to be people who have downloaded the unannounced beta.
TF Some users never learn.)
Well, I'm a Kamikaze! :-) and it's _my_ choice
It still won't show common folders, so it's no use to me.
--
Dwight A. Corrin
P O Box
Hi!
TF 1.) When you are in the process of sending a
TF message and hit Delete Task in the Connection
TF Center, the message will not be sent. If you
TF try to send it later, you get the error
TF message Nothing to Send even though the
TF message sits there in the Outbox. This can be
TF remedied
Hello Thomas,
23 Dec 2001, 17:21:32, you wrote:
P Also on Connection Centre the checkbox dont't show error message,
P just keep on retrying (or something like that) works only
P partially -
P it keeps the error messages away alright but it doesn't keep on
P retrying... :(((
TF Where is this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Thomas
TF Where is this checkbox? I couldn't find it.
TF Three more things I would like to report about the Connection Center,
TF which are all present also in the current release version and should
TF be fixed before a new release.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Pete,
On Sun, 23 Dec 2001 17:52:59 +0200 GMT (23/12/2001, 23:52 +0800 GMT),
Pete wrote:
P Also on Connection Centre the checkbox dont't show error message,
P just keep on retrying (or something like that) works only
P partially -
P it keeps
Hi John,
On 23 Dec 2001 at 11:05:08 [GMT -0500], you wrote:
JS Took a little searching to find this one. I am on a cable connection
JS so in my network options is set to a LAN connection, no tick box in
JS CC.
Ah, of course. I think you got it pinned down. It's so simple.
Of how much use would
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 23 Dec 2001 15:24:43 +0100GMT (which was 15:24 +0100GMT where I live),
Dierk Haasis thought about Still present... and wrote:
No, can't find it anywhere. I have none of the problems with the CC
locking up after send and receive. I
On 23 Dec 2001, 8:24:43 AM, Dierk Haasis wrote:
No, can't find it anywhere. I have none of the problems with
the CC locking up after send and receive. I just can't find the
check box to tell it to auto disconnect.
Seems to be an XP issue.
See my attached PNG.
Mine both look
Hi Dierk,
No, can't find it anywhere. I have none of the problems with the CC
locking up after send and receive. I just can't find the check box to
tell it to auto disconnect.
DH Seems to be an XP issue.
No. This checkbox only appears when you let TB! dial-up the network
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Peter,
On Sun, 23 Dec 2001 17:19:30 +0100 GMT (24/12/2001, 00:19 +0800 GMT),
Peter Meyns wrote:
PM Btw., I was really impressed of your connection centers, as I never knew
PM anything else than shown in cc1.png. It didn't occur to me to tear
On Sun, 23 Dec 2001 11:05:08 -0500GMT (which was 17:05 +0100GMT where I live),
John Seymour thought about Connection Center (was: Still present...) and wrote:
TF Where is this checkbox? I couldn't find it.
JS Took a little searching to find this one.
JS Are your settings for LAN
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 24 Dec 2001 00:46:32 +0800GMT (which was 17:46 +0100GMT where I live),
Thomas F. thought about Connection Center (was: Still present...) and wrote:
PM Btw., I was really impressed of your connection centers, as I never knew
PM anything else
This message: 23/12/2001 17:54 GMT.
Hello Pete,
A reminder of what Pete ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) typed on:
23 December 2001 at 17:52:59 GMT +0200
P It's behind that connection tab which seems not to be there on
P everyone's CC! Compare the images Tony and Dierk sent in this thread.
P Really
This was posted some ages ago :-), but still present.
Bug:
Where:In main window, when previewing message.
click on field with sender info (after FROM) - it *looks* like unchecked
(unselected, if you want)
then switch to another program and back - it becomes checked (as it
REALLY
72 matches
Mail list logo
