the first time today under Spam with my
provider! Your rogue has been in your message!
%SetHeader(X-Rogue,:roland_burger:)%-
Free of charge or cheaper phoning with Skype: http://www.skype.com/
My Skype-name: roland1713
--
Best regards,
Roland
I use The Bat! v3.64.01 Christmas
Hi Mary,
Thursday, December 15, 2005
you let us know -possibly edited- :
Thanks for putting that information on BT at
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5462
Hope this issue and all those concerning headers will be fixed ASAP.
This may be related to the missing template macros as
Hello Charlene!
On Friday, December 16, 2005, 5:33 AM, you wrote:
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5462
Hope this issue and all those concerning headers will be fixed ASAP.
Stefan reports on that page that this issue is fixed in v. 3.63.13.
This may be related to the missing template
Hello Everyone!
For messages created in betas since 3.63.09, the Roguemoticon cannot
be seen by the recipient. Even if you type the handle in manually in
the MicroEd Edit Mail Message window, after the message is sent,
there is no X-Rogue field to be seen when it is opened in the
recipient's view
Hello all,
Thursday, December 15, 2005, Mary Bull wrote:
Please support https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5462
if you would like this headers-editor bug to be fixed.
All support will be greatly appreciated!
confirm and supported in BT.
--
Bye
Marek Mikus
Czech support of The Bat!
Answering a current message (Thursday, December 15, 2005, 14:30)
Hello Mary,
MB For messages created in betas since 3.63.09, the Roguemoticon cannot
MB be seen by the recipient.
This is also true for my template macros
%SetHeader(X-No-Archive,yes)%-
%SetHeader(X-Archive,expiry=0)%-
Both are
Hi Mary Bull,
Thursday, December 15, 2005
you let us know -at least in parts- :
if you would like this headers-editor bug to be fixed.
All support will be greatly appreciated!
Added a note, since it is not working here either. Only pictures from
address book are shown, however.
--
kind
Hello Peter!
On Thursday, December 15, 2005, 7:38 AM, you wrote:
MB For messages created in betas since 3.63.09, the Roguemoticon cannot
MB be seen by the recipient.
This is also true for my template macros
%SetHeader(X-No-Archive,yes)%-
%SetHeader(X-Archive,expiry=0)%-
Both are missing
Hello Charlene!
On Thursday, December 15, 2005, 7:49 AM, you wrote:
if you would like this headers-editor bug to be fixed.
All support will be greatly appreciated!
Added a note, since it is not working here either. Only pictures
from address book are shown, however.
Thanks for putting
Hi Peter,
on Thursday, December 15, 2005 at 14:38 you wrote in message
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
among others:
Answering a current message (Thursday, December 15, 2005, 14:30)
Hello Mary,
MB For messages created in betas since 3.63.09, the Roguemoticon cannot
MB be seen by the recipient.
Hi Roland Burger,
Thursday, December 15, 2005
you let us know -at least in parts- :
MB For messages created in betas since 3.63.09, the Roguemoticon cannot
MB be seen by the recipient.
Works for HTML-mails like the one I am replying to right now!
Sorry for my first HTML-mail here, I do
Hello Roland!
On Thursday, December 15, 2005, 8:12 AM, you wrote:
MB For messages created in betas since 3.63.09, the Roguemoticon
MB cannot be seen by the recipient.
This is also true for my template macros
%SetHeader(X-No-Archive,yes)%-
%SetHeader(X-Archive,expiry=0)%-
Both are
On Thursday, December 15, 2005, 7:30:47 AM, Mary Bull wrote:
Please support https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5462 if you
would like this headers-editor bug to be fixed.
All support will be greatly appreciated!
Done. Hope someone at RITlabs will find the time to read them.
--
Dwight
Hello Charlene!
On Thursday, December 15, 2005, 8:22 AM, you wrote:
MB For messages created in betas since 3.63.09, the Roguemoticon
MB cannot be seen by the recipient.
Works for HTML-mails like the one I am replying to right now!
Not seeing either the X-Rogue handle or the Roguemoticon here
Hello Dwight!
On Thursday, December 15, 2005, 8:42 AM, you wrote:
Please support https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5462 if you
would like this headers-editor bug to be fixed.
All support will be greatly appreciated!
Done. ...
Thanks a mil to you, Dwight, and to all others who have
On Thursday, December 15, 2005, 8:50:58 AM, Mary Bull wrote:
Sorry for my first HTML-mail here, I do this for testing purpose
only. I manually put in my rogue handle and want to know if it
really works for HTML.
Doesn't work for this recipient. (:
Anywqay, HTML editor would be no
Hi Mary,
on Thursday, December 15, 2005 at 15:41 you wrote in message
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
among others:
Hello Roland!
An I cannot use my QTs with version 3.63.12! May be it is due to
that there is nothing working if you click on "To" in new mails!
You mean in the headers?
Normally
Hello Roland!
On Thursday, December 15, 2005, 8:58 AM, you wrote:
An I cannot use my QTs with version 3.63.12! May be it is due to
that there is nothing working if you click on To in new mails!
You mean in the headers?
Normally there has to be opened the addressbook to insert then the
Hallo Roland,
On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 15:12:01 +0100GMT (15-12-2005, 15:12 +0200, where
I live), you wrote:
RB Hi Peter,
moderator
Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not
just to the person being replied to, even if their post may have
instigated this reply. Please
Hi Mary Bull,
Thursday, December 15, 2005
you let us know -at least in parts- :
Not seeing either the X-Rogue handle or the Roguemoticon here.
Strange that this doesn't affect all TBBETA-list members. Some rogues I
can see and some not.
Sorry for my first HTML-mail here, I do
Hello Charlene,
On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
CF I often wonder why some list members constantly refrain from enabling
CF the X-mailer ID in Options | Preferences | Use X-mailer header...
CF It would be helpful for others and would show some kind of courtesy to
CF fellow
!
Unfortunately, it doesn't work. Probably you can see yourself from Address
Book, because your message does not contain X-Rogue field in the header.
--
Best regards,
Zygmunt Wereszczynski
(Using The Bat! v3.63.12 (Beta) in OTFE mode with BayesIt! 0.8.4
on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4
On Thursday, December 15, 2005, 1:14:47 PM, Charlene Ferrara wrote:
It would be helpful for others and would show some kind of courtesy
to fellow users.
It used to be automatic. There was some problem with blacklists of TB!
which led to making it an option. My information is more available
Hi Richard Wakeford,
Thursday, December 15, 2005
you let us know -at least in parts- :
Not being to well up on all these headers (I only use the ones people
tell me about) could you elucidate further and then I might stop being
one of those who doesn't have the X-mailer ID disabled as it is
Hi Zygmunt Wereszczynski,
Thursday, December 15, 2005
you let us know -at least in parts- :
Unfortunately, it doesn't work. Probably you can see yourself from Address
Book, because your message does not contain X-Rogue field in the header.
Yes, I saw it. That was subject of my test. I
the enabling or disabling of the X-mailer ID has been subject of
CF change without further notice and its settings changed in the past,
Well, I've just had a look at my headers and the X-Mailer is disabled
here. In fact the only two that are enabled are my Spam-Pal one and I've
just added my X-Rogue
-Pal one and I've
just added my X-Rogue, even though it is set via my TB! templates anyway
but, of course, it doesn't work in these later versions.
Your rogue doesn't show up, no matter if enabled by hand or by macro as
stated by many users in http://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5462.
CF That's
to version 08 and the same happened there so that's
not the reason they're not showing up in these later versions. I'm back
to the X-Rogue in my template now (ready for when it's finally working
again which I'm sure will be soon) and just put X-Rogue back in the
space as originally requested when
Hello Charlene,
Thursday, December 15, 2005, 9:07:18 PM, you wrote:
CF It was spoken
CF that the ID was cloaked by default because TB at a certain moment was
CF under suspicion to be a mass mailer tool (don't remember the correct
CF expression) and therefor was blocked by some ISPs.
Mine is
Hello Raymund,
On Thu, 7 Jul 2005 21:25:16 +0200 GMT (08/07/2005, 02:25 +0700 GMT),
Raymund Tump wrote:
RT But a :rogue: is nothing more than a smiley for TB! and so it can't
RT choose to display it or not.
Smileys are displayed in the message body. Rogues are displayed in
the grey header. Yes,
Hello Peter!
On Thursday, July 07, 2005, 12:25 AM, you wrote:
- TB *knows* where the sig begins!
How does it know? From the sig delimiter mark? (Sorry, I'm not a
programmer, so I'm just floundering around here--no pun intended.)
Therefore it would be quite easy to use/display the rogues
Hello Mary,
Wednesday, July 6, 2005, 5:39:05 PM, you wrote:
I was in PM with Leif (on whose server PCWize runs) over the
weekend. It's been going down every few days. I'm going to CC this
to him, in case he hasn't noticed yet that it's out again.
G. That's it. I need to pull that box down
Hello Peter Hampf everyone else,
on 06-Jul-2005 at 23:26 you (Peter Hampf) wrote:
BM I did see the following line in your header:
BM X-Rogue: :stuartc:
By typing the line above (the second one) in your message TEXT your
message got displayed with Stuarts picture! That's REALLY not what
Hello Peter Hampf everyone else,
on 07-Jul-2005 at 19:28 you (Peter Hampf) wrote:
ASK Not here. Maybe because I have disabled the smileys?
Exactly. Enable smileys
Why would I do that? :-)
and you will see the wrong sender photo.
Not the best implementation if you ask me. I'd expect to see
Hello Peter Hampf everyone else,
on 07-Jul-2005 at 07:25 you (Peter Hampf) wrote:
Therefore it would be quite easy to use/display the rogues images ONLY in
the header pane or in the sig, not in the body. And in the header pane it
should only be displayed, if the expression appears in the
Hello Peter!
On Thursday, July 07, 2005, 12:28 PM, you wrote:
ASK Not here. Maybe because I have disabled the smileys?
Exactly. Enable smileys and you will see the wrong sender photo.
Unchecking Smileys in the right-click context menu alone won't do it;
Plain Text View also has to be chosen.
On Thu 7-Jul-05 9:40am -0500, Leif Gregory wrote:
Wednesday, July 6, 2005, 5:39:05 PM, Mary Bull wrote:
I was in PM with Leif (on whose server PCWize runs) over the
weekend. It's been going down every few days. I'm going to CC this
to him, in case he hasn't noticed yet that it's out again.
Hello Bill!
On Thursday, July 07, 2005, 1:04 PM, you wrote:
I was in PM with Leif (on whose server PCWize runs) over the
weekend. It's been going down every few days. ...
G. That's it. I need to pull that box down and rebuild it from
scratch. It's just so dang unstable right now (at
On Thu 7-Jul-05 1:12pm -0500, Mary Bull wrote:
It's up and running, at present. I downloaded Ben Allen's latest pic a
couple of hours ago:
Thanks Mary, I've just downloaded and installed it
during lunch - I see you!
--
Best regards,
Bill
The Bat 3.51 Pro BayesIt! 0.8.1 X-Ray 1.4.0.0 XP
Hello Bill!
On Thursday, July 07, 2005, 2:13 PM, you wrote:
It's up and running, at present. I downloaded Ben Allen's latest pic a
couple of hours ago:
Thanks Mary, I've just downloaded and installed it
during lunch - I see you!
Looking forward to seeing you, when you have the time to put
Hi!
- the [:]stuartc[:] expression is part of the ROGUES file which is intended to
display the *senders* foto.
- TB *knows* where the sig begins!
But a :rogue: is nothing more than a smiley for TB! and so it can't
choose to display it or not.
--
Regards,
Raymund
from initial Leif's idea to
the X-Rogue header field
--
9Val
http://9val.dyndns.org/wp/
Current beta is 3.51 | 'Using TBBETA
Hello 9Val!
On Thursday, July 07, 2005, 2:40 PM, you wrote:
Perhaps it is time to disable locating smileys in the message body, as
you remember, it was migration step from initial Leif's idea to
the X-Rogue header field
9Val, am I misunderstanding you?
Do you mean Roguemoticons from
Hello Mary,
Perhaps it is time to disable locating smileys in the message body, as
you remember, it was migration step from initial Leif's idea to
the X-Rogue header field
MB 9Val, am I misunderstanding you?
MB Do you mean Roguemoticons from the Rogues folder and Rogues.msl file
Hello Mary Bull everyone else,
on 07-Jul-2005 at 19:51 you (Mary Bull) wrote:
Unchecking Smileys in the right-click context menu alone won't do it;
Plain Text View also has to be chosen.
It does not disappear immediately when turning smileys off, but switching
to a different message then
Hello Mary,
Thursday, July 7, 2005, 11:51:02 AM, you wrote:
BTW, today is Leif's birthday! :happybirthday: , Leif!! Perhaps we
could get him to amend the code as a birthday present to all of us
Roguemoticon and Smiley aficionados!
Don't look at me.. I didn't write the code in TB as to where
Hello 9Val!
On Thursday, July 07, 2005, 3:11 PM, you wrote:
Perhaps it is time to disable locating smileys in the message body, as
you remember, it was migration step from initial Leif's idea to
the X-Rogue header field
MB 9Val, am I misunderstanding you?
MB Do you mean Roguemoticons
Hello Leif!
On Thursday, July 07, 2005, 3:27 PM, you wrote:
BTW, today is Leif's birthday! :happybirthday: , Leif!! Perhaps we
could get him to amend the code as a birthday present to all of us
Roguemoticon and Smiley aficionados!
Don't look at me.. I didn't write the code in TB as to where
Hello Peter!
On Thursday, July 07, 2005, 3:48 PM, you wrote:
9 Perhaps it is time to disable locating smileys in the message body,
If you mean roguemoticons, I totally agree with you. The only place for this
kind of smileys should be the header pane. (i.e. sender photo)
9Val does mean the
Hello Peter!
On Thursday, July 07, 2005, 4:09 PM, you wrote:
MB I think we can look forward to a change in how TB! handles this (no
MB more displays of Roguemoticons in message body, including sig; Rogue
MB pics appearing only in the headers).
Good news!
Yes!!
So forget about all the
Hello tbbeta,
X-rogue test, beware.
--
Best regards,
Stuart mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat! v3.51
Bayes Filter Plugin v2.0.3
On Windows XP 5.1 Build #2600
Current beta is 3.51 | 'Using TBBETA
Hello Stuart!
On Wednesday, July 06, 2005, 2:29 PM, you wrote:
X-rogue test, beware.
I C U ! Looking good! :)
--
Best regards,
Mary
The Bat 3.51 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2
Current beta is 3.51 | 'Using TBBETA
On Wed 6-Jul-05 2:29pm -0500, Stuart Cuddy wrote:
X-rogue test, beware.
What is with the x-rogue stuff? I checked the help
file for both rogue and x-rogue - there is no such
thing.
I did see the following line in your header:
X-Rogue: :stuartc:
--
Best regards,
Bill
The Bat 3.51 Pro
Hello Bill,
A reminder of what Bill McCarthy typed on:
Wednesday, July 06, 2005 at 15:45:29 GMT -0500
X-rogue test, beware.
BM What is with the x-rogue stuff? I checked the help
BM file for both rogue and x-rogue - there is no such
BM thing.
BM I did see the following line in your
Hello Peter!
On Wednesday, July 06, 2005, 4:26 PM, you wrote:
BM I did see the following line in your header:
BM X-Rogue: :stuartc:
Hey! You managed to find a bug in TBs header handling!
By typing the line above (the second one) in your message TEXT your
message got displayed
- but no X-Rogue header (he is using the
:name: tag - which I though generated the X-Rogue
header).
However, unlike in the monthly mail, your picture is
not visible to me.
--
Best regards,
Bill
The Bat 3.51 Pro BayesIt! 0.8.1 X-Ray 1.4.0.0 XP Pro SP2 POP3
of
the mail - but no X-Rogue header (he is using the
:name: tag - which I though generated the X-Rogue
header).
It can be generated in two ways, as you did read.
However, unlike in the monthly mail, your picture is
not visible to me.
Two questions:
1) Is my picture visible to you?
2) Have you
On Wed 6-Jul-05 5:35pm -0500, Mary Bull wrote:
Two questions:
1) Is my picture visible to you?
No.
2) Have you downloaded the Rogues.zip from PCWize?
Never.
Actually, three questions:
If you've never downloaded the Rogues.zip, did you by chance ever put
the picture of the author of
Hello Bill,
A reminder of what Bill McCarthy typed on:
Wednesday, July 06, 2005 at 18:17:27 GMT -0500
BM I will try to remember to look for that zip file - the
BM site: http://www.pcwize.com/thebat is currently
BM unavailable.
Use this: http://www.pcwize.com/thebat/smileys/rogues.zip
--
Hello Bill!
On Wednesday, July 06, 2005, 6:17 PM, you wrote:
...did you by chance ever put the picture of the author of the
monthly reminder in your Address Book for him, or put his v-card in
your address book?
At a matter of fact his picture is in my address book -
there once was a rogue
Hello Tony,
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005 14:29:24 +0100 GMT (06/06/2005, 20:29 +0700 GMT),
Tony Boom wrote:
TB Mine was the same but I was adding the colon in the Display as field.
TB It seems to want to add that itself. As soon as I took it out it started
TB working.
Anyway, it works now. :-)
--
--On Thursday, June 09, 2005 22:31:12 +0700 Thomas Fernandez
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyway, it works now. :-)
Think I got it working with this Linux version as well?
--
Tony.
LM
Current beta is 3.5.26 | 'Using TBBETA'
Hi Tony,
-- 09.06.2005 16:55 +0100:
Anyway, it works now. :-)
Think I got it working with this Linux version as well?
Yes, works. :)
BTW - are under gnome? Why don't use evolution or is evolution good in
IMAP? I'll set up a new system next week - Ubuntu, yeah. ;)
Sorry, please don't
Hi Tony,
In the message mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] which was
apparently written on Thursday, June 9, 2005, 4:55:59 PM. I believe you wrote:
TB Think I got it working with this Linux version as well?
Linux version?
--
Best regards,
Liz (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
Website:
Hi Liz,
-- 09.06.2005 17:38 +0100:
Think I got it working with this Linux version as well?
Linux version?
...of Mulberry.
--
Manuel, http://www.manuel-breitfeld.de
Current beta is 3.5.26 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
Hello All,
Thursday, June 9, 2005, 7:58:53 PM, you wrote:
Think I got it working with this Linux version as well?
Linux version?
...of Mulberry.
Please move this to tbot or reply off list
I have a spare HD for my Lappy and I want to put a Linux/unix type OS.
What are the recommendations?
Hello Manuel.
--On 09 June 2005 18:17 +0200 you wrote about Re: X-Rogue?:
BTW - are under gnome? Why don't use evolution or is evolution good in
IMAP? I'll set up a new system next week - Ubuntu, yeah. ;)
Use KDE and I don't like Evolution.
Sorry, please don't trout me. Perhaps it's better
Hello Liz.
--On 09 June 2005 17:38 +0100 you wrote about Re: X-Rogue?:
Linux version?
Of Mulberry, not The Bat, don't get excited :)
We've been asking for a Linux version for years.
--
Tony.
M
pgpytFUip6lAa.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hello TBBETA,
Why don't my photo show?
I've got %SetHeader(X-Rogue,:tbc:)%- in my templates, it always used
to work and everyone else' shows OK.
--
Tony.
Using The Bat! v3.5.25 Windows XP Home SP2
Pentium IV, 2.4Ghz Home Built Desktop.
:gentoo:
www.gentoo.org
Hello Tony,
Monday, June 6, 2005, 11:41:14 AM, you wrote:
Hello TBBETA,
Why don't my photo show?
I've got %SetHeader(X-Rogue,:tbc:)%- in my templates, it always used
to work and everyone else' shows OK.
Dunno, mine seems to have stopped as well
Sean
--
ICQ: 679813 YAHOO
Hello Sean,
A reminder of what Sean Rima on TBBETA typed on:
06 June 2005 at 11:54:37 GMT +0100
Dunno, mine seems to have stopped as well
No it hasn't, I see you OK.
--
Tony.
Using The Bat! v3.5.25 Windows XP Home SP2
Pentium IV, 2.4Ghz Home Built Desktop.
:gentoo:
Hello Tony,
Monday, June 6, 2005, 11:58:53 AM, you wrote:
Hello Sean,
A reminder of what Sean Rima on TBBETA typed on:
06 June 2005 at 11:54:37 GMT +0100
Dunno, mine seems to have stopped as well
No it hasn't, I see you OK.
Just noticed that. Have you got a special template for
Hello Sean,
A reminder of what Sean Rima on TBBETA typed on:
06 June 2005 at 12:03:11 GMT +0100
Just noticed that. Have you got a special template for the list as
there is no Rogue header in your message at all
Yes I have, a new and a reply template and both have...
%SetHeader(X-Rogue
, a new and a reply template and both have...
%SetHeader(X-Rogue,:tbc:)%-
In them.
Maybe u have a common template that is overwriting it, dunno but I
checked the last reply I sent and it had the Rogue header, yours
doesn't. It is getting stripped somewhere
Sean
--
ICQ: 679813 YAHOO
Hello Sean,
A reminder of what Sean Rima on TBBETA typed on:
06 June 2005 at 12:03:11 GMT +0100
Maybe u have a common template that is overwriting it, dunno but I
checked the last reply I sent and it had the Rogue header, yours
doesn't. It is getting stripped somewhere
Not sure what
Hello Tony,
Monday, June 6, 2005, 12:17:24 PM, you wrote:
Hello Sean,
A reminder of what Sean Rima on TBBETA typed on:
06 June 2005 at 12:03:11 GMT +0100
Maybe u have a common template that is overwriting it, dunno but I
checked the last reply I sent and it had the Rogue header,
Hello Peter,
A reminder of what Peter Hampf on TBBETA typed on:
06 June 2005 at 13:28:19 GMT +0200
Have you defined the header in Options/Preferences/Message headers as well?
How do I do that? I did try but it just kept telling me I couldn't use it
as it's an internal process?
--
Hello Sean,
A reminder of what Sean Rima on TBBETA typed on:
06 June 2005 at 12:20:22 GMT +0100
Weird, maybe u are using a VF and there is a template in there or
maybe no templae or something
No, it's a fresh install and this message addressed itself OK.
To: Tony Boom [EMAIL
Hello Peter,
A reminder of what Peter Hampf on TBBETA typed on:
06 June 2005 at 13:28:19 GMT +0200
Have you defined the header in Options/Preferences/Message headers as well?
OK, lets try it this time
--
Tony.
Using The Bat! v3.5.25 Windows XP Home SP2
Pentium IV, 2.4Ghz Home Built
field and see if X-Rogue: showes up. If not there is a
config problem
--
ICQ: 679813 YAHOO: thecivvie
Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] AIM: tcobone
Vodafone +353879120530
Winamp is stopped
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Hello Tony,
A reminder of what Tony Boom on TBBETA typed on:
06 June 2005 at 12:41:03 GMT +0100
OK, lets try it this time
Well that didn't work.
--
Tony.
Using The Bat! v3.5.25 Windows XP Home SP2
Pentium IV, 2.4Ghz Home Built Desktop.
:gentoo:
www.gentoo.org
Monday, June 6, 2005, 5:41:14 AM, (Internet Time - @486) you wrote:
Hello Tony,
TB Hello TBBETA,
TB Why don't my photo show?
TB I've got %SetHeader(X-Rogue,:tbc:)%- in my templates, it always used
TB to work and everyone else' shows OK.
It is funny, sometimes I see your photo
Hi Tony,
on Mon, 6 Jun 2005 12:08:26 +0100GMT, you wrote:
Just noticed that. Have you got a special template for the list as
there is no Rogue header in your message at all
TB Yes I have, a new and a reply template and both have...
TB %SetHeader(X-Rogue,:tbc:)%-
TB In them.
Have you
Hello Peter,
A reminder of what Peter Meyns on TBBETA typed on:
06 June 2005 at 14:55:59 GMT +0200
Have you defined the X-Rogue header in Preferences -- Message headers
in your new installation?
Yes but I'm not sure it's right. I even restored my old installation to
check everything
Hi Tony,
on Mon, 6 Jun 2005 14:02:13 +0100GMT, you wrote:
TB A reminder of what Peter Meyns on TBBETA typed on:
TB 06 June 2005 at 14:55:59 GMT +0200
Have you defined the X-Rogue header in Preferences -- Message headers
in your new installation?
TB Yes but I'm not sure it's right. I
Hello Peter,
A reminder of what Peter Meyns on TBBETA typed on:
06 June 2005 at 15:23:15 GMT +0200
Mine are: Display as: X-Rogue:
RFC-Name: X-Rogue
Allow editing
Mine was the same but I was adding the colon in the Display as field.
It seems to want to add
On Monday, June 6, 2005 @ 4:08:26 AM [-0700], Tony Boom wrote:
Just noticed that. Have you got a special template for the list as
there is no Rogue header in your message at all
Yes I have, a new and a reply template and both have...
%SetHeader(X-Rogue,:tbc:)%-
By the way...anyone have
Hello Matt!
On Monday, June 06, 2005, 9:17 AM, you wrote:
%SetHeader(X-Rogue,:tbc:)%-
By the way...anyone have the link for the latest set of rogue pictures?
Here you go, Matt:
Download the latest http://www.pcwize.com/thebat/smileys/rogues.zip
--
Best regards,
Mary
The Bat 3.5.25
88 matches
Mail list logo
