On Monday, September 27, 2010, 12:50:28 PM, Vili wrote:
I totally agree with Thomas. TB is not user friendly when reporting
errors, warnings. The error should be put into the face of the user,
suggest him a solution and allow him to bypass this kind of
certificate security issues if he
On Monday, September 27, 2010, 3:25:31 PM, Rick wrote:
You have to remember that theBAT is always looking out for us. I see
this issue as very similar to the refusal to enable inserting notes or
other useful information into the body of messages in your data base,
or doing things like
On Monday, September 27, 2010, 7:04:13 PM, NetVicious wrote:
What's the problem with It. I can export the mail and modify it and
later import it to The Bat!. I have the same result. What's the
diference
if you can't see the difference, I'm not sure I could explain it.
--
On Wednesday, September 22, 2010, 10:28:51 AM, Maxim Masiutin wrote:
OK with these AVs and bugs, you may start using the alpha version,
but you may lose mail.
do you mean some loss on downloading from POP server?
Or if I set up installation which only checks IMAP, is there risk it
On Saturday, September 18, 2010, 7:18:58 AM, Peter Hampf wrote:
The Bat!
v4.2.36.4 Professional Edition 21-Apr-2010 16 MB is offered for download.
?-}
Couldn't tell you how long I've been running .4
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
photo
On Saturday, September 18, 2010, 10:03:01 AM, Peter Hampf wrote:
It's the fact that my TB is detecting a version from April in September that
amazes me.
computers are funny. you'd think they would be more predictable, but
we all know they aren't.
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385
On Monday, July 26, 2010, 9:20:45 PM, Gene Kearns wrote:
HOWEVER, tonight's
experiences with Version 4 makes it clear that Backup and Restore just
doesn't work.
you are using an awfully old beta. couldn't more recent versions
perhaps perform better?
--
Dwight A. Corrin
On Monday, June 14, 2010, 1:15:41 AM, Jay Walker wrote:
Dwight, if that is your fetish, then perhaps you should join the FBI
it's my bad typing and seeing what I intended what I typed on
proofing. plez insert a NOT in the appropriate spot
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385
On Sunday, June 13, 2010, 6:54:33 PM, Franz Schoeler wrote:
will The Bat! then start/boot again in tenths of seconds instead of
29 seconds as right now on this computer?
I think they may charge extra to diagnose your computer problems.
btw: Does anyone like programs that are practically
On Sunday, June 13, 2010, 8:30:08 AM, Jay Walker wrote:
Okay, but so what? All I said is that Outlook displays the HTML that I
receive much better than TB. Since you don't receive my email, I think
that I am a better authority on that subject than you are. :)
I have interest in seeing
On Thursday, June 10, 2010, 12:21:16 PM, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
I'm not sure I said anything about IMAP (I don't use it anyway), but
TBBETA seems to be slow because of the rewrite.
I'm sure you did not mention IMAP. But you mentioned it was a good
time to address this, and I assumed
On Friday, June 11, 2010, 4:47:46 AM, Vili wrote:
A normal HTML viewer. I dont want to send examples. Ritlabs should
install an Outlook and go over like a 1000 HTML mails. When TB matches
up to Outlook for all of them, then the job done. Not until that.
seems like an absurd suggestion and
On Saturday, June 12, 2010, 2:47:34 PM, Rick wrote:
Hardly absurd. They need to fix the way the bat works with HTML
They are working on IMAP right now of course but at some point this should be
dealt with
I'm not meaning improving IMAP is absurd. I saying the suggestion that
they should
On Saturday, June 12, 2010, 3:59:53 PM, Rick wrote:
The way I understood is that they should install Outlook then make
the bat render to that as a standard. (I'm wincing as I say
Outlook and standard in the same sentence. :)
That isn't what I understood the suggestion to be, but is seems a
On Wednesday, June 9, 2010, 11:34:18 AM, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
Good idea to bring this up again.
R I would like to see the ability to edit the subject line in received emails
R Here's the link to support it
R https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6700
R Thanks
Added a bugnote.
Hello
On Monday, April 19, 2010, 2:30:46 PM, Raymund Tump wrote:
Seems that 4.2.36.1's IMAP is broken (again).
concur. see my message
mid:814285317.20100416144...@fastmail.fm
and the thread in which it is contained. 4.2.33.9 works adequately for
day to day use.
--
Dwight A. Corrin
On Friday, April 16, 2010, 12:11:08 PM, Maxim Masiutin wrote:
SOCKS in 4.2.33 didn't work, we have made an updated version, please test it
and let me know.
www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/thebat_pro_4-2-36.msi
after successful install, content of messages is not downloading at my
On Tuesday, April 6, 2010, 12:47:06 PM, Maxim Masiutin wrote:
. Please download the correct files again from the same URL(s):
u and r here
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
photo galleries at http://dcorrin.smugmug.com
photo blog at
On Saturday, March 27, 2010, 7:50:41 PM, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
No conspiracy theory. It's just that we, over here on the beta list,
want something to play with.
actually, lots of us want the IMAP to work on. Not to start a new beta
cycle on an old cycle which is over.
--
Dwight A.
On Monday, March 22, 2010, 9:23:55 AM, Marck Pearlstone wrote:
Had a report that the list was not responding. This is a probe
message to see if that's the case...
just sitting back waiting for the IMAP beta testing to begin.
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax
On Friday, March 12, 2010, 6:28:31 PM, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
Done. I do believe it has to do with your settings in URL manager
though, whether the problem occurs.
I find this paragraph confusing. Whose settings?
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax
dcorrin at
I just tried to search the log. There is no provision that I could
find to search for more than one instance of the string searched. No
way to find a second instance.
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
photo galleries at
On Wednesday, February 24, 2010, 1:52:05 AM, Ian A. White wrote:
This is where you receive a HTML message and there is a URL that has
issues.
sure can't help you there. TB doesn't and won't be downloading any
url's here.
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax
On Sunday, February 7, 2010, 4:18:32 PM, Paul Van Noord wrote:
They _did_ send a link. It is in the first line of the message. It
seems inappropriate that a non-M$ email client should be a browser. I
like the distinction and expect to use a browser for many HTML
messages.
if you are going
On Friday, February 5, 2010, 10:37:37 PM, Roger Phillips wrote:
Still does not print everything that is displayed. If the displayed
message is more than say 76 characters wide, it only prints the 76
characters. A browser will print everything that is displayed.
But your
On Sunday, January 31, 2010, 5:53:52 AM, Maxim Masiutin wrote:
The Bat! 4.2.24.6 Beta is available at
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/tb42246.rar
I am having a strange behavior this afternoon, since installing latest
beta. At least twice I have read a message, then gone
On Thursday, January 28, 2010, 2:49:45 PM, Ian A. White wrote:
Well, here is a PNG graphic pasted inline. Naturally, the message has to be
in HTML format.
looks fine here
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
photo galleries at
On Thursday, January 28, 2010, 9:46:00 PM, Ian A. White wrote:
I have just become caught up in the disaster that is 4.2.24.3 Alpha.
The last word is what is concerning me. The beta list is now being
used to carry out alpha testing, and so we are ending up using a
program that is extremely
On Thursday, January 28, 2010, 9:46:00 PM, Ian A. White wrote:
I have just become caught up in the disaster that is 4.2.24.3 Alpha.
The last word is what is concerning me. The beta list is now being
used to carry out alpha testing, and so we are ending up using a
program that is extremely
On Thursday, January 28, 2010, 9:48:22 PM, Costas Papadopoulos wrote:
I just sent myself an e-mail that contained a ZIP and RAR attachment.
The attachments in the Sent Mail folder are OK as both test OK.
The attachments in the received mail folder are both considered
invalid by WinZip and
the color of the type
pretty ridiculous
Hello Volker,
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 20:15:11 +0100 GMT (26/Jan/10, 2:15 AM +0700 GMT),
Volker Ahrendt wrote:
See here the previous discussion
[Reply to: »Dwight Corrin« · 2010-01-25 · 18:55 h (CET)]
Moin, Dwight!
And you can write some text
:15 AM +0700 GMT),
Volker Ahrendt wrote:
See here the previous discussion
[Reply to: »Dwight Corrin« · 2010-01-25 · 18:55 h (CET)]
Moin, Dwight!
And you can write some text in it
On Monday, January 25, 2010, 11:48:10 AM, Mark Partous wrote:
As Dwight Corrin said : "you can
Title: Re: De rust keert terug in januarie..
On Monday, January 25, 2010, 9:23:21 AM, Hans Stam wrote:
In my reply.. in emails, see an example here below, I see that blue fat line.. how can I change this
you can make it thinner by hovering with the mouse over the right margin of it and
On Monday, January 25, 2010, 9:54:58 AM, Volker Ahrendt wrote:
In my reply.. in emails, see an example here below, I see that blue
fat line.. how can I change this
you can make it thinner by hovering with the mouse over the right
margin of it and dragging to the left.
1. IMO it should be
Title: Re: De rust keert terug in januarie..
On Monday, January 25, 2010, 11:48:10 AM, Mark Partous wrote:
As Dwight Corrin said : "you can make it thinner by hovering with the mouse over the right margin of it and dragging to the left"
you can make it stand out too :)
On Monday, January 18, 2010, 2:21:50 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
Running here, except that mail retrieval is not running smoothly.
Folder check on startup does not complete. Also manual mail check. But
with a little jiggling, I can get mail.
That's very strange, we didn't change anything
On Thursday, January 7, 2010, 5:10:59 PM, Maxim Masiutin wrote:
[*] Improved speed of handling folder names. This may be noticeable
on very slow computers with very large folder trees, otherwise the
effect is negligible. But this can caouse data loss unless you
copy your message base
On Thursday, December 24, 2009, 11:40:01 AM, Maxim Masiutin wrote:
The Bat! 4.2.14.2 BETA is available at
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/tb42142.rar
seems fine here so far.
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
photo
On Thursday, November 19, 2009, 4:09:07 AM, Maxim Masiutin wrote:
[-] IMAP didn't work in the previous alpha (BETA issue)
confirmed here as well
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
photo galleries at http://dcorrin.smugmug.com
photo blog
On Tuesday, November 17, 2009, 5:34:27 PM, Bob Riley wrote:
FYI, I just switched back to 4.2.13.1, and now IMAP works perfectly.
confirmed. with the new 432.13.2, nothing ever happened in the
connection center. No error messages on exit, just nothing logged and
no indication it
On Saturday, October 31, 2009, 2:56:39 AM, GwenDragon wrote:
I have this problem too with a new IMAP-Account.
I promise to open a new IMAP account or two as soon as we get an IMAP
beta, which I HOPE is SOON. Until then I'm just going along with what
I have, where my main complaints are
On Friday, October 30, 2009, 5:33:27 AM, Marek Mikus wrote:
my test was really strange. I sent a message with background to my gmail
account, and looked at it with gmail. Beginning of the text showed up in
I can reproduce this by sending a message with any background color
and white
On Friday, October 30, 2009, 5:28:31 AM, Marek Mikus wrote:
I have sent an HTML message with green background to gmail from MS Outlook
and Gmail do not show it neither, so I do not think, You should use Gmail as
a reference.
it didn't hit me that I had used white type on my initial test
On Thursday, September 17, 2009, 2:29:01 AM, Carsten Guthardt-Schulz wrote:
I wonder, though, what will happen if I move the mails and TB
disconnects even within a batch, will some of the mails be lost?
I've never had a problem like that, but if it is a concern, you can
always copy, then
On Thursday, September 17, 2009, 7:04:09 AM, Carsten Guthardt-Schulz wrote:
The Bat disconnects (claiming that the server ended the connection)
whenever the message to be uploaded exceeds 2 MB.
never had this happen to me. How can TB be broken because the server
ends the connection?
Title: Re: HTML Editor: Text background colour is not properly terminated
On Thursday, September 17, 2009, 8:31:44 AM, Jean-Michel Saby wrote:
Could somebody please confirm this problem ?
confirmed. Blocking and choosing a background color for slected text seems to make the background
Title: Re: HTML Editor: Text background colour is not properly terminated
I have turned the background of this entire message silver. I am going toHIGHLIGHTthe all cap word by changing the background color for that word to white. I believe the entire message will arrive with a white background.
Title: Re: HTML Editor: Text background colour is not properly terminated
On Thursday, September 17, 2009, 8:51:18 AM, Dwight Corrin wrote:
I have turned the background of this entire message silver. I am going to HIGHLIGHT the all cap word by changing the background color for that word
On Thursday, September 17, 2009, 9:12:43 AM, Carsten Guthardt-Schulz wrote:
If you try to copy a message of 2 MB to an IMAP folder of your choice, does
the upload work?
I'm not sure what you are trying to do. I have no problem sending
messages larger than that, and just successfully
On Thursday, September 10, 2009, 11:58:36 AM, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
But the logic of your problem is this: When you create the message,
the folder/AB template applies with regards to the editor. If you
reopen it from the editor, TB! forgets about that template and uses
the default editor.
On Friday, September 11, 2009, 9:15:26 PM, Ian A. White wrote:
Are you saying that your default message format is Plain Text; you
created a message in HTML format; saved it to your Outbox as a draft;
then double-clicked on it in the Outbox and the message format
remained as HTML when it
On Wednesday, September 9, 2009, 4:35:04 PM, Rick wrote:
That still translates to ... BROKEN.
the problem I keep reporting is that if one sends queued mail, and
there are messages present for delivery later, they get send
immediately.
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385 phone
On Thursday, August 27, 2009, 3:11:27 AM, Henk M. de Bruijn wrote:
Is the similar version as the one we are using right now?
I just ran the MSI. (Hadn't updated to 4.2.10.7 yet.) After MSI
finished, I still have 4.2.10.6 installed.
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385 phone ahead
On Thursday, August 27, 2009, 10:54:47 AM, Rick wrote:
Is there anyone with an interest in postponed sending?
I really have no apparent need for it. I tested it several times, and
never saw it get fixed.
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
On Thursday, August 27, 2009, 11:09:07 AM, Dwight Corrin wrote:
Is there anyone with an interest in postponed sending?
I really have no apparent need for it. I tested it several times, and
never saw it get fixed.
I just sent a delayed message from my IMAP account. When I hit
On Monday, August 24, 2009, 12:41:51 PM, Maxim Masiutin wrote:
[-] (#0007696): problems reading certain html messages with latest betas
the messages I observed to be problematic are now displaying again.
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
photo
On Saturday, August 22, 2009, 12:14:54 AM, Roger Phillips wrote:
No problem here with HTML messages. I cannot check IMAP or MAPI.
have you tried the samples uploaded to bug tracker?
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=7696
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax
I subscribe to certain (html) newsletters from www.slate.com Today I
discovered that all I was seeing was the header, and that the body of
the text did not appear in 4.2.10.5. I flagged 7 which didn't appear,
then tried again in 4.2.10.4. Still not there. I went to look at my
xp-pro desktop
I subscribe to certain newsletters from www.slate.com Today I
discovered that all I was seeing was the header, and that the body of
the text did not appear in 4.2.10.
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
photo galleries at
On Friday, August 21, 2009, 3:43:44 PM, Dwight Corrin wrote:
I subscribe to certain newsletters from www.slate.com Today I
discovered that all I was seeing was the header, and that the body of
the text did not appear in 4.2.10.
it looks like my outbox is misbehaving again
On Friday, August 21, 2009, 5:49:32 PM, Arjan de Groot wrote:
I think you have to provide RL with some samples of non-readable HTML
messages, because the messages I tried myself just showed OK in
4.2.10.5.
I opened a bug report, and sent an email about same, which now does
not
On Friday, August 21, 2009, 4:11:39 PM, Ralf Schellenberger wrote:
i have the same problem.
I made tracker report
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=7696
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
photo galleries at http://dcorrin.smugmug.com
photo blog
On Wednesday, August 19, 2009, 1:45:10 AM, Jernej Simončič wrote:
Add Move to previously viewed and Move to next viewed buttons to your
toolbar (or use Alt+Left and Alt+Right keyboard shortcuts).
sometimes it would be nice to go back to the last message viewed in a
particular folder,
On Wednesday, August 19, 2009, 5:13:09 AM, Roelof Otten wrote:
In that case select that folder, TB remembers where it was.
but not the previously viewed one in that folder.
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
photo galleries at
On Monday, August 17, 2009, 7:08:07 AM, Scott Sims wrote:
The icon still does not have the moving bat icon when in the taskbar.
When will this be fixed?
It just flaps away here. Doesn't even seem to get tired. Works for
xp pro,vista 32 and 64
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385
can anyone explain why my outbox looks like this?
http://dcorrin.smugmug.com/gallery/5166336_ozSKQ#600510039_bzMoL-A-LB
the message is there 17 times. Only 16 appear to be parked. The
message does not appear in my sent mail folder. When I hit the upward
pointing green arrow on an
On Friday, July 24, 2009, 12:29:47 PM, MAU wrote:
It seems that each 'Auto Save' didn't overwrite the previous
one.
it should, shouldn't it?
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
photo galleries at http://dcorrin.smugmug.com
photo blog at
On Wednesday, July 22, 2009, 2:03:18 PM, Bob Riley wrote:
waiting patiently to get back to TB with
improved IMAP
you are not alone.
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
photo galleries at http://dcorrin.smugmug.com
photo blog at
On Sunday, July 5, 2009, 3:12:57 PM, Jens Franik wrote:
But what else has been the Reason for it? (do you already know?)
I have no idea. I have not observed that it happens in any particular
folder, or at any particular time. It seems to be random, and was a
pretty regular occurrence.
On Sunday, July 5, 2009, 8:42:09 AM, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
I confirm this behaviour. It only applies to parked messages
my duplicate message problems have had nothing to do with parked
messages.
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
photo
On Thursday, June 25, 2009, 5:10:12 PM, Roelof Otten wrote:
Could it be that you've got some filters that are making amok?
I've pretty much retired my xp machine. (have been saving for IMAP
testing when it comes), but I had this problem, of messages being
listed twice frequently. It
On Monday, June 15, 2009, 2:39:50 PM, mse wrote:
Did you or the other user close the program between creating the
mails and sending them?
I know that I have to close the program often, because that is the
only to get counts updated, new mail colleccted, and messages which
have been
On Monday, June 15, 2009, 2:39:50 PM, mse wrote:
Did you or the other user close the program between creating the
mails and sending them? Has the computer been in standby or in
hibernation mode and has been restarted before the mails ought to be
sent? Has Windows been restarted? Has the
First of all, my sent mail is wierd, because it always shows the
received time an hour later than the created date, including when it's
not during daylight savings time.
Yesterday at 9:14 am, I sent myself a message, to be dispatched at 8
am tomorrow (today). The message was sent today,
On Thursday, June 11, 2009, 11:34:47 AM, Dwight Corrin wrote:
There is a second message, which was composed at the same time, and
set to be sent in 24 hours, by the custom setting. This message is
still sitting in the outbox, (it is currently about 11:35 am
Thursday
On Monday, June 8, 2009, 5:44:30 PM, Marek Mikus wrote:
I hope, this is enough now to stop imap-related discussion until anything
related to IMAP will be announced.
I would say just the opposite, that an IMAP announcement might stop
the imap related discussion by either raising hopes
On Tuesday, June 9, 2009, 7:13:48 PM, Rick wrote:
Maybe its time to call this thread to an end.
Ya THNK? Why don't we all go over to the table, have cake and ice
cream and enjoy the rest of the evening :)
I think the cake and ice cream is a good idea. I'm going to watch the
Stanley Cup
On Monday, June 8, 2009, 4:23:43 PM, Marek Mikus wrote:
this build called 4.2 was not planned in january and was released now as
requested bugfix version with some additions and Postponed sending. This
is the reason.
If this is true, what will the excuse be in 4 or 5 months when 4.3
fixes
On Monday, June 8, 2009, 5:23:05 PM, Marek Mikus wrote:
customers.
those waiting on IMAP are not customers? (I only go back to 1.x)
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
photo galleries at http://dcorrin.smugmug.com
photo blog at
On Monday, June 8, 2009, 4:55:39 PM, Marek Mikus wrote:
seems You care about IMAP only, but for example our customers requested
version without problem with DEP detection under Windows 2008 Server,
version with fixed incorrect handling of MIME boundary, versions with fixed
templates in
On Sunday, June 7, 2009, 1:11:45 PM, Raymund Tump wrote:
What is it exactly that is required in IMAP?
in vista, the only way for message counts to be accurate, or for
messages which may have been read at another venue to not be treated
as unread, is to close and re open the program.
On Sunday, June 7, 2009, 8:39:39 AM, Ethan J Mings wrote:
What is it exactly that is required in IMAP? I keep hearing, reading and
observing endless complaints. If its a complaint, so be it. If its
a real IMAP bug, report in bug track.
perhaps you haven't been paying attention? we were
I just found this trapped in my outbox, so I'm sending it now.
On Sunday, May 31, 2009, 11:50:05 AM, Gleason Pace wrote:
And it seems we both use Fastmail, and I have had no problem creating
new folders.
my problems in this regard occurred long ago, and I've not tried again
since.
On Saturday, May 30, 2009, 9:50:51 AM, Marek Mikus wrote:
You can not be serious, because Thunderbird is based on code from Mozilla
Suite, so Thunderbird had IMAP support from start, but code was 6 years
old!
I don't know or care whether he is right about thunderbird. If it had
a decent
On Saturday, May 30, 2009, 7:39:05 AM, Gleason Pace wrote:
But I maintain that The Bat Imap is much much better than it was just a few
years ago. All that remains of the old quirkiness for me is the
occasional Ctrl-c to refresh folder contents.
While I agree that it is better than it
On Saturday, May 30, 2009, 7:39:05 AM, Gleason Pace wrote:
But I maintain that The Bat Imap is much much better than it was just a few
years ago. All that remains of the old quirkiness for me is the
occasional Ctrl-c to refresh folder contents.
While I agree that it is better than it
On Thursday, May 28, 2009, 10:50:02 AM, Maxim Masiutin wrote:
In english it gives You can control at what time the message will be sent
if it will be
finished later on:. I think it's more clear.
I don't fully agree with that translation.
it should warn at least, that despite the time set, if
On Thursday, May 28, 2009, 2:34:05 PM, Zygmunt Wereszczynski wrote:
Confirmed as fixed, but now we have a redundancy: both macros
(%Postpone and %Delay) work.
but sending queued mail from the outbox still sends the delayed
messages, regardless how long they were supposed to sit
On Thursday, May 28, 2009, 3:07:37 PM, Zygmunt Wereszczynski wrote:
On Thursday, May 28, 2009, at 14:41:09 [UTC-0500] (Thursday, May 28,
2009 21:41 my local time) Dwight Corrin wrote:
Confirmed as fixed, but now we have a redundancy: both macros
(%Postpone and %Delay) work
On Thursday, May 28, 2009, 3:44:29 PM, Dwight Corrin wrote:
here is a test message I marked to send in 24 hours, today at 2:10
pm. As you can see, it has already arrived.
well, forwarding message doesn't seem to save the headers, so I guess
what I sent doesn't prove anything
On Thursday, May 28, 2009, 3:26:28 PM, Alto Speckhardt wrote:
No no, landslide progress like this has to be approached very
carefully. Only he who moves makes mistakes. Better to sit perfectly
still, whatever happens then is not your fault. Better let others move
first, and then, in
On Monday, May 25, 2009, 4:39:58 PM, Rick wrote:
Has anyone else noticed that delayed sending seems totally broken in
this release? (4.1.14.1)
Seems like a fair statement to me. See 1514908674.20090521173...@fastmail.fm
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax
dcorrin at
On Friday, May 22, 2009, 1:19:57 AM, Marek Mikus wrote:
what antivirus?
mcafee
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
photo galleries at http://dcorrin.smugmug.com
photo blog at http://dcorrin.aminus3.com
On Friday, May 22, 2009, 3:03:25 AM, Paul R. Zwiers wrote:
Same here, still using the official latest release of TheBat, no beta. Matter
of time before McAfee releases a new new version of the DAT files. They have
a reputation to uphold when it comes to false negatives after updating :-)
This morning, when I installed this release candidate, I sent myself
some test messages. Several have been sent early. The one which is
supposed to go tomorrow morning at 8 am is still sitting in my outbox,
but has also arrived, at 5:17 pm this afternoon, with a creation time
of this
On Tuesday, February 24, 2009, 7:00:22 AM, MAU wrote:
I think the developers have much more important bugs and issues to
address. Like for example IMAP (which, BTW, I don't use at all).
Yes, I think that many users are going to be very disappointed, and
others are going to move on to being
On Saturday, February 7, 2009, 9:26:47 PM, Bob Riley wrote:
Are you saying that you, too, use IMAP with your ISP and/or Mail
Provider, and you don't see the unable to send mail body due to
processing error message and/or the queuing problem?
I have never seen this error. I have been using
On Sunday, December 21, 2008, 12:20:09 PM, Bob Riley wrote:
If anyone here has used Fastmail, what has your experience with it
been?
I have been on fastmail for quite a while now. I am very pleased with
it. And I certainly wouldn't ever want to go back to POP.
The closest to a
On Sunday, December 21, 2008, 4:30:24 PM, Stuart Cuddy wrote:
A couple of days ago a version was released that made a change that was
supposed to help the queue from freezing in IMAP. I don't have the original
message here at work, so I forget which version it was. However, we were asked
On Saturday, December 20, 2008, 9:31:37 AM, Maxim Masiutin wrote:
Please test the 4.1 release MSIs which we are going to release on
Tuesday.
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/thebat_pro_4-1-3.msi
I locked up when I clicked launch and closed the install window. I had
thebat
301 - 400 of 531 matches
Mail list logo
