Priority of IMAP (was: Quiet?)

Hi, Chris Weaven wrote: from what I've heard, IMAP is lacking somewhat. As I am entirely IMAP based, I'm in no great hurry to test in this case. ACK(*). New GUI(+) or no new GUI, working IMAP(#) is what I want. Regards, Markus * Acknowledge[d] (antonym: NACK (not acknowledged)) + Graphical

Re: IMAP fine tune - cosmetic glitch

Hi, Chris wrote: Can anyone else confirm? Confirmed. Regards, Markus Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link

Re: batskin.ini file format

Hi, Alexey wrote: I agree that XML would be much better I'm also a strong supporter of XML for this (Firefox and Trillian, if I'm not mistaken, are two examples that use XML based skin descriptions pretty well). Yet, I'm wondering if TB's developers are already beyond a point where this is

Re: TheBat Wish : multiple mail identities

Hi, Marcus Williams wrote in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: I'd like a drop down in the from address similar to the one thats already there that offers the each accounts associated address. You could create dummy accounts and then select the account in the editor pane. (Of course you would have to

Re: V2.12b6 : password protected account not functional

Hi, 9Val wrote in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Surely it is not by design, but I don't know the reason. It is not reproducable for me (may be because of some today's fixes) Perhaps this observation helps: it works with POP3 accounts and fails for my IMAP account. Regards, Markus -- Using

Re: OT: Martin gets trouted, read all about it.

Hi, I just noticed that Leif initially announced that he already created a trout smiley. Sorry for my freshness. (I can't get to the URL he posted, though.) Regards, Markus -- It doesn't matter what comes, fresh goes better in life... :) Using The Bat! 2.12 Beta/1 under Windows XP 5.1 Build

Re: v2.04.4 and kaspersky AV plugin

Hi, z0mbie wrote in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: sorry, i sent that by mistake, i was going to test AV plugin and mixed up messages :] Frankly, I don't like that. Sending out a virus/trojan by mistake (and to an email list) is hard to tolerate. It also doesn't make it any better that z0mbie

Re: Problem with international () characters

Hi, interesting, yet probably unrelated: In the email header pane the Cyrillic text appears properly, yet when I select it by clicking once in the line, I get to see 'funny' characters. (I use the font Microsoft Sans Serif.) Regards, Markus -- COLON HYPHEN RIGHTPAREN Using The Bat! 2.03

Re: slight transparent blue

Hi, Gunivortus Goos wrote in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Windows XP Professional, english/american version with SP1. It's the same kind of blue as the scrolllines, but much slighter, a kind of pastel colour. Anybody know which exact item (eg. window title, window background, etc) it takes this

Re: Signature delimiter (was: Re: Backup script was: (The Bat! v2.01.49 is now available))

Hi, Tony Boom wrote in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Believe me I have tried... BLOODY HARD! And what makes it worse is I can see the delimiter is there, space an all just by running the cursor over it. But I bet the trailing space is gone when this gets to the list. You won your bet. (SCNR) The

Re: The Bat! v2.01.56 is now available

Hi, Stefan Tanurkov wrote in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: [-] (#0001415) The old way of displaying of received/created time is restored I see the day of the week twice now. Once abbreviated, once spelled out. I don't recall this being like that before. Sample from Stefan's message (my locale

Re: Message/Bericht

Hi, Mark Partous wrote in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Does anyone recognise this? I think it comes from broken reply templates (broken in the way that they do not work properly under 2.0 anymore). I see this sometimes as well. I use English settings and sometimes the reply text has the original

Heretical suggestion: use IE's HTML parser as alternative option

Hi, food for thought: wouldn't it facilitate HTML viewing if IE's parser (if installed) could be selected for displaying HTML mail? Of course this decision should be made by the user and active and external content could be filtered out before passing the code to IE's engine. Comments welcome in

Re: -- after PGP verification

Hi, Andy wrote in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: To what extent is the string -- one we need to use... could the signature delimiter string be different? It seems to me that we have constant issues with the trailing space magic. I would be very happy if there were an equivalent string that did

Re: cpu 99%

Hi, Davide Ferrari wrote in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: It seems that TB 20 beta 2 to 5 uses 99% of CPU time... But normal operations are executed normally Is it only a nominal 99% or the CPU is really doing something when the bat is running? I noticed the same behavior, traced the IMAP

Re: cpu 99%

Hi, Marek Mikus wrote in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: I can't confirm this on WinXP EN, which OS You have? I can positively confirm it for NT 4 SP6a and XP Pro SP1. Perhaps it is related to IMAP sync settings (e.g. how often folders are checked and how long a connection is kept alive). Regards,

NOOP (IMAP)

Hi, my Bat got stuck while heavily NOOPing. It used my whole DSL bandwidth at home and I had to kill it. In the IMAP trace log I noticed that it was apparently NOOPing all the time for quite a while and way too often (since there are no time stamps in the log I can only guess). To me the log

Outbox on the IMAP sever?

Hi, does anyone really have an IMAP account that has an actual Outbox on the server? I had to leave that field empty in my IMAP configuration since there is no such thing under my GMX account. Now my messages get sent and stay in my Outbox, they don't get moved (locally and on the server) to my

Re: Outbox on the IMAP sever?

Hi, Olivier Mascia wrote in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: MG Now my messages get sent and stay in my Outbox, they don't get MG moved (locally and on the server) to my Sent Items. Is this regular MG behavior? Bug that I reported with Beta/1. Could you setup an outgoing filter that would move

Shutdown crash also with AVG 10

Hi, in my environment TB! also crashes on shutdown even after I updated to AVG's plugin v10. Anybody else able to confirm this? Regards, Markus -- Go ahead... make my day. -- Dirty Harry Using The Bat! 1.63 Beta/11 under Windows NT 4.0 Build 1381 Service Pack 6

Re: Old bugs still exists in 1.63/beta9

Hi, Marck D Pearlstone wrote in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : %SUBJECT=Re: strips the Re: - I'm having to edit it in by hand after starting a reply :-( Confirmed. Regards, Markus -- My Granny started running 3 miles a day when she was 56. Now she's 73 and we have no idea where she is!

Re: 1.63 Beta/8

Hi, Stefan Tanurkov wrote in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : [-] Various bugs related to the new folder storage mechanism Waiting for your comments... As always :-) Uhm, what about my pet bug: magical compression message wipe? Regards, Markus

1.63 Beta/8 reply, date and character encoding problems

Hi, I get very weird results from my reply template. An original message (dated Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 10:49:10 +0200) contains the text 1) Bitte senden Sie mir eine Re:eMail, wenn diese angekommen ist. When I reply to this message I get the following: Sie schrieben am 10310r 0310r10:493r 103rr

Re: Very complicated wish (Filters)

Hi, Philippe Gouillou wrote in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : I wasn't clear. The idea is that, as it is now, the filters apply following the orders of lines (1st line = 1st filter) with, as it is now, an option Continue processing with other filters. The idea is

Re: message that freeze the bat!

Hi, FYI: the first message of this thread was considered possibly containing a virus and withheld by GMX on the way to me. (AFAIK the use Sophos.) Regards, Markus -- Don't anthropomorphize computers. They hate that. Using The Bat! 1.63 Beta/7 under Windows NT 4.0 Build 1381 Service Pack 6

Re: message that freeze the bat!

Hi, Thomas Fernandez wrote in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : I have not enabled GMX's virus scan. I see, another person that has a professional GMX account. :) I scan by myself - I am a control freak. ;-) Well, I have it activated, just for fun. One time their scanner stumbled over an email from

Re: REQUEST: Iconify ThBat! with cloose (X)

Hi, Allie Martin wrote in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : I tried it and although it does disable the close button, it affects how my templates work. It seems to disable TB!'s ability to look in it's installation directory for files defined in templates when only a file name is given. Thanks

Re: REQUEST: Iconify ThBat! with cloose (X)

Hi, Allie Martin wrote in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : I tried it and although it does disable the close button, it affects how my templates work. It seems to disable TB!'s ability to look in it's installation directory for files defined in templates when only a file name is given. I've

Re: Wierd problem in 2000 and XP

Hi, Kent Villard wrote in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Has anyone encountered this Yes, I have. Although this is a very wide shot I renamed Thebat.exe to thebat.exe and haven't noticed it again (yet this might be a coincidence, it doesn't really make sense). Regards, Markus -- Non Illegitimus

Re: 1.63 Beta/6

Hi, Bruno Fernandes wrote in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : And here's a feature request: Allow the pull-down history in the FROM header item to list the various from addresses I have defined for my different folders. Currently it will only list the ONE that is being used for the current

Re: 1.63 Beta/6

Hi, Oleg Titov (quoting Spike) wrote in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : S Perhaps a _WARNING_ when the size of a message folder approaches S the limit of the O/S file size. +2 vote for this Count me in! I've also lost some mail because compression on shutdown kicked it and didn't check if there was

Re: attachment filename bug?

Hi, Den V. Yafyasov wrote in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : So whose it is a mistake, The BAT! or SMTP-server? The culprit is the application that created this mail. Was it the Bat, if so which version? Regards, Markus -- Neniu anticipas la hispanan Inkvizicion. Using The Bat! 1.63 Beta/3 under

Re: 1.63 Beta/3; Installation

Hi, Joseph N. wrote in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : I think I'm going to take the plunge. Can this version be installed right over my 1.62/17 installation, or should I uninstall the previous version? Absolutely not, do not uninstall! TB beta RARs contain just the executable, just shut down the

Re: OT: Bayesian filter - V2 idea

Hi, Graham wrote in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : There is a lot of discussion currently about the use of Bayesian algorithms to filter spam, and there are some products coming on the market which allow you to try this novel approach. Thank you for this valuable pointer. I have come up with a

Re: 1.62/B7 and Read Filters

Hi, Joseph N. wrote in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Is anyone else having a problem with the reliability of 'read' filters under ver. 1.62/Beta 7? Yes, yet even under 1.61. I have a read filter that should export attachments. As an incoming filter it works, yet as a read filter it complains in

Re: Writing and Reading Asian Languages (Was: Re: Writing and readingJapanese)

Hi, God wrote: Oh no, not again! D.Adams HHGTG. Dierk Haasis wrote in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : So, there's already one for you? Wouldn't it be nice to have a religion with a higher Being we chose to worship* called Marck? Or Phil, or Sandy? I already proclaimed the Church of Marck

Re: Writing and Reading Asian Languages (Was: Re: Writing and readingJapanese)

Hi, Dierk Haasis wrote in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : No wonder, it is my own translation from German - that much I give you as a hint. Thanks for the hint. [...] Bur-Malottke hatte dem Intendanten vorgeschlagen, das Wort Gott durch die Formulierung 'jenes höhere Wesen, das wir verehren' zu

Re: Hghlights only fails?

Hi, Graham Foster wrote in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : 1.60g.. selecting Highlights only in the Account log, give me an empty list. Just me.. or anyone else able to reproduce this? Works fine with 1.60c (I donwgraded from 'g' since I noticed weird display issues, e.g. the message body pane

Re: AVG Plugin

Hi, Thomas Martin wrote in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : The only thing which doesnt work is to Sign incoming and outgoing messages with a certificate as it is told in the configuration..But doesnt matter. AFAIAC these certificates add more clutter than information. I don't trust any such

Re: 2 simultaneous fonts in message list

Hi, Dierk Haasis wrote in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : BTW, Microsoft Sans Serif (or MS SSerif) are, TMK, only found on systems running Win ME or later. But they can be copied over to older systems. :) Regards, Markus -- Contains freshness saver packet. DO NOT EAT. Using The Bat! 1.60c under

Re: 2 simultaneous fonts in message list

Hi, Miguel A. Urech wrote in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : I only have MS Sans Serif, not Microsoft Sans Serif. Well, then you have to find out which unicode font is used on your PC. I copied Micosoft Sans Serif from another of my PCs running XP. Regards, Markus -- Neniu anticipas la hispanan

Re: 2 simultaneous fonts in message list

Hi, I, Markus Gloede wrote in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Before you despair because you do not find this setting: it's well hidden under Options/Preferences/System/Fonts. Again, I was too fast and erred. Lars Geiger wrote in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : This can be changed via the Font

Re: RC with degraded IMAP capabilities?

Hi, Stefan Tanurkov wrote in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Did you cleared out the Mailbox field when you reset the mask? Here everything shows up fine... I know this might be heresy, but did you try it with a freshly installed beta or RC? OTOH could it be that somewhere during the beta cycle

Re: The Bat! - bug report - address book

Hi, Ron Secord wrote in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Not the same, but as you can see there are two entries for each display name, which is unnecessary. When you enter a middle name you'll notice that the options are different. To circumvent the display of redundant options the Bat! could check

RC with degraded IMAP capabilities?

Hi, I know IMAP is not the Bat's forte but it got worse during this beta cycle. Is it really going to remain like that? Regards, Markus -- He's dead, Jim. -- McCoy, The Devil in the Dark, stardate 3196.1 Using The Bat! 1.54 Beta/50 under Windows NT 4.0 Build 1381 Service Pack 6 --

Re: Beta 40 - Don't download!!

Hi, Marck D Pearlstone wrote in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : I did / have and Tony's signatures are still invalid when using MS CryptoAPI but valid using internal. Why? When you use MS CryptoAPI IE's certificate storage is being used to validate signatures. Perhaps something is wrong with the

Certificates internal vs MS Crypto API (was: Beta 40 - Don't download!!)

Hi, I, Markus Gloede wrote in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : When you use MS CryptoAPI IE's certificate storage is being used to validate signatures. Perhaps something is wrong with the certificates in that storage? Proably BT's certificate is missing. Bingo, I imported the BT certificate

Re: Certificates internal vs MS Crypto API (was: Beta 40 - Don't download!!)

Hi, now comes the funny part. In msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I had set the S/MIME options to use MS CrAPI. I wasn't prompted for a passphrase and the message went out. Now this message show invalid with the Bat's S/MIME API. Guess I have to check my own cert storage now. Regards, Markus -- For

Re: Certificates internal vs MS Crypto API

Hi, Eddie Castelli wrote in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Your Signature shows *invalid* Hopefully it is valid in this mail (using internal S/MIME and Sign when completed). Regards, Markus -- Klatu barada nikto. Using The Bat! 1.54 Beta/41 under Windows NT 4.0 Build 1381 Service Pack 6

Re: Please send us new GLYPH (was:Re: 1.54 Beta/40)

Hi, Alexis Haeringer wrote in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Could you please send us the new glyph.bmp. the feature makes use of an image that is already part of the regular glyph.bmp. If your glyphs aren't up-to-date I suggest installing the latest release version of the Bat! and replacing the

Re: 1.54 Beta/40

Hi, Miles Alexander wrote in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Is there anyone that has been keeping a running record of enhancements/changes/fixes along the 1.54 Beta path? Günther Eisele kept track (currently up to beta 38): http://www.guenther-eisele.de/bat/154-new.txt Regards,

Re: The Bat deletes attachments

Hi, Stefan Tanurkov wrote in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : This is why we give you a choice: either keep attachments in body and have no problems whatsoever (maybe speed, but really big attachments do not come often) How do you know that? Are you going to add a sticker to the Bat! package

Re: The Bat deletes attachments

Hi, Alain de Gevigney wrote in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : I try it but couldn't agree with you: here is how I test it: 1) create an account 'test_FA' with attachments stored in special directory 2) create 2 sub-folders in Inbox - Test_FA_1 - Test_FA_2 3) add 2 filters to dispatch

Re: The Bat deletes attachments

Hi, I filed a bug report in the appropriate web interface (original description: msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ). Regards, Markus -- For some reason, this signature reminds everyone of Marvin Zelkowitz. Using The Bat! 1.54 Beta/29 under Windows NT 4.0 Build 1381 Service Pack 6 --

Re: The Bat deletes attachments

Hi, Anton I. Danilov wrote in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : I personally dislike TB's habit to duplicate attachments when they're the same files and attached to different letters... It also could be solved and it could save much diskspace, at least in my case, it would save up to 50% of the

Link msgid should be mid (RFC-2392)

Hi, in accordance with RFC-2392 I suggest that the currently working link msgid: should be changed to mid:; (see also ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc2392.txt;). Regards, Markus -- This signature intentionally says nothing. Using The Bat! 1.54 Beta/26 under Windows NT 4.0 Build 1381 Service

OT: Pronunciation of 'polish' (was: BUG: 1.54b12: Smart pad not working properly...)

Hi, On Thursday, November 29, 2001, 6:41:49 PM, Peter Palmreuther wrote: Den verstehe ich nicht ... bin ich jetzt blöd oder ist der so anspruchsvoll??? [Expressing that he doesn't get Dierk's joke.] It's about the pronunciation of the word 'polish'. The verb (German 'polieren') and noun

The Bat! - bug report (1.54/10e) - scrollbar handle

Hello The Bat! developers, I'm using The Bat! Version 1.54/10e Serial Number 4A849B39 under Windows NT 4.0 Build 1381 Service Pack 6 and would like to report a bug The bug description: The accounts pane scrollbar handle proportions are not in relation to the content. When

Re: The Bat! - bug report (1.54/10e)

Hi, Nick Andriash wrote: I don't seem to find that behaviour at all, but I suspect you are using the RTF Viewer, correct? Right. Minor visual glitch: original message pane in reply editor uses different font, where is the setting for that? Again, this must be only with the fancy viewer,

SOT: From -- FAQ (was: Quoting)

Hi, Marck D Pearlstone wrote: No. It has been put there by a *nix routing MTA to differentiate the From at the start of a line in you message body from the From ... that starts a new message in *nix mailbox format. We often see such changes, either a '' or a '-' stuck in there. It also

Downgradable? was: 1.54 Beta/9

Hi, what's the current status of downgrade problems from a beta to a non-beta? Does this still result in setting losses? I would like test beta 9 without losing something should I need to go back to 1.53. Regards, Markus -- Using The Bat! 1.53d under Windows NT 4.0 Build 1381 Service Pack 6

Re: A Feature that bugs me.

Hi, On Thursday, July 12, 2001, 12:04:09 PM, Jonas Koopmann wrote: Can confirm that. It's the same with .RTF. We had this discussion a while ago. The problem is that those attachments are announced in the MIME headers as plain text and are thus displayed inline. It has been suggested to offer

Entrust doesn't find a valid S/MIME part

Hi, when I send a S/MIME signed message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with importCert in the subject I get the following response: Certificate import output: IsValidSmimeSequence() returned error (-4085) EntrustFileSMIME::The data does not contain a valid S/MIME message. What is wrong? Regards,

F9 minimizes

Hi, am I the only one where F9 minimizes TB! rather than bringing up the Source View? Regards, Markus -- Using The Bat! 1.53 Beta/11 under Windows NT 4.0 Build 1381 Service Pack 5 -- __ Archives : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com

IF macro

Hi, I don't get this to work (it should create a gender specific formal address): %IF:%ABtoGENDER=1:Sehr geehrter Herr:Sehr geehre Frau The result is (address book entry is female): :2=1:Sehr geehrter Herr:Sehr geehre Frau What am I doing wrong? Regards, Markus -- Using The Bat! 1.53

Re: RTF Bug

Hi, On Tuesday, May 15, 2001, 10:31:43 AM, Philippe Gouillou wrote: I've just sent a mail to myself to test and compare the headers. You'll find hereafter the headers for both. The difference is : Received : Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

Re: Anyone know about..

Hi, Graham Foster wrote: a) the %- macro?.. what is i supposed to do. It did nothing for me in a template IIRC, it can be used to allow a line break within a macro (regexp) that usually needs to be within one line. Regards, Markus -- Using The Bat! 1.52f under Windows NT 4.0 Build

Re: quote signs slipping in emails

Hi, On Tuesday, April 24, 2001, 6:28:30 PM, Joerg Hevers wrote: within the last weeks I noticed a strange behaviour of The Bat!. On some mails I'm receiving, there seem quote-characters to be included randomly at the beginning of a line. So someone is writing some lines of text to me and in

Re: %SingleRe

Hi, Thomas Fernandez wrote: I don't know, I haven't been able to send an email to the outside world (i.e. Internet email addresses) with FirstClass. Risking this to become OT, is it possible with FC? If you have a FC messaging server/gateway you can send email. Yet it is a real pain and

The Bat! - minor bug report // address highlight parser

procedure. Steps to reproduce the bug: Look above, is the address highlighted? BTW: *@somewhere.com should also be highlighted (there might be more like that). Before you ask, yes, I know of real addresses like this. Regards, Markus Gloede

Re: The Bat! - bug report

Hi, On Tuesday, March 28, 2000, 11:09:54 AM, Roel wrote: confirmed here, but with an irregularity: some messages do show the icon... (and they have no other attachments...) Could you check if those message have a MIME alternative part? (Since the Bat is still lacking a View Source option you

Re: Serious Database Problem

Hi, On Wednesday, March 22, 2000, 11:53:38 PM, Keith Russell wrote: I started up TB again and it seemed to pick up right where it left off. Things were looking good as it zipped right through converting several folders, until it ended up hanging on another one 8-(. Unlike you, I can't

Re: Window positions messed up after crash - followup

Hi, a followup on my own post. On Thursday, February 10, 2000, I wrote: The Bat crashed on me (I guess the SMTP server went down while receiving a message) and now the dialog that pops up when I empty a folder is in the lower right hand corner of my screen (where usually my delivery status

The Bat! - bug report

giving you the opportunity to open multiple editor windows or select a recipient from the address book. Select the second option and pick an address. Click OK in the address selection dialog. Now click OK on the re-direct dialog and access violation occurs. Regards, Markus Gloede

Re: OT: EMA

Hi, my name is Markus and I'm also an emailaholic. I don't want to be cured and, what's even better, my job makes me use email a lot. I suggest to other people that need to vindicate their email-dependency to take up a job in Internet related support. And addition to the list on how to find