Bernd Distler [BD], wrote:
Sorry, I missed that... I'll add and post again tomorrow.
BD So you could change my settings?
It's been a busy week...
--
.\\artin | ICQ 15893823
We are born princes, and the civilizing process makes us into
frogs. ERIC BERNE
Martin Webster [MW], wrote:
MW I've started this thread so those IMAP users who are _not_
MW experiencing significant performance problems can share how they've
MW set up TB! I think this will be useful for determining optimum
MW configurations based on server type, connection etc.
Here's a
Sunday, November 7, 2004, 11:14:19 AM, (Internet Time - @759) you wrote:
Hello Martin,
MW Martin Webster [MW], wrote:
MW I've started this thread so those IMAP users who are _not_
MW experiencing significant performance problems can share how they've
MW set up TB! I think this will be useful
Martin,
On 07-11-2004 18:14, you [MW] wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
MW Here's a summary in Excel (18kB). I've not done any analysis but
MW will start experimenting with my set-up as a result of this
MW exercise. Thanks for your contributions.
Maybe you should add my second setup since this
Peter Fjelsten [PF], wrote:
MW Here's a summary in Excel (18kB). I've not done any analysis but
MW will start experimenting with my set-up as a result of this
MW exercise. Thanks for your contributions.
PF Maybe you should add my second setup since this is an Exchange server
PF with some more
Hi Martin,
just now (on 11/07/2004 at 22:14) you noticed:
Sorry, I missed that... I'll add and post again tomorrow.
So you could change my settings?
TheBat 3.0.2.5
[X] use precise counter
Thanks :)
--
Adios,
Bernd (http://www.bd-programs.de - ICQ 12962268)
Keith,
On 05-11-2004 08:53, you [KR] wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
KR Michael Acklin wrote:
These I-[ ] When browsing messages, retrieve only message
KR text
Could -[ ] except messages smaller than [ ] K Bytes
Not Find -[ ] Use precise counters (needs fast connection)
Hello, Peter.
On Friday, November 5, 2004, 1:02:03 AM, you wrote:
KR Like Michael and Bernd, I wasn't able to find these, either. I
KR had a little trouble tracking down some of the others, as well,
KR since some are out of sequence.
These are only available in the daily build from yesterday.
Hello all,
Friday, November 5, 2004, Bernd Distler wrote:
[ ] When browsing messages, retrieve only message text
[ ] except messages smaller than [ ] K Bytes
--- Where can i find this option?
[X] Use precise counters (needs fast connection)
--- Where can i find this option?
this is under
Keith,
On 05-11-2004 09:29, you [KR] wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
KR 2.[X] Retrieve message structures together with message
KR headers
9Val explained this to me yesterday: It retrieves information about all
message parts (if it is multipart), and therefore knows about has
message
On Friday, November 05, 2004 at 3:47:52 AM [GMT -0500], Peter Fjelsten
wrote:
9Val explained this to me yesterday: It retrieves information about
all message parts (if it is multipart), and therefore knows about
has message attachments or not
KR Why would one not want this?
Idunno - as
On Friday, November 05, 2004 at 2:02:17 AM [GMT -0500], Peter Fjelsten
wrote:
[x] Check mailbox at start-up - I don't think these
[x] Periodical checking each [5] minutes - actually do anything?
The folder refreshing every x minutes simply does a server count
refresh.
Check
Allie,
On 05-11-2004 13:04, you [AM] wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
AM The more information you retrieve about a message, the more
AM bandwidth is being used. So for slow connections, you should
AM minimize what you retrieve in order to see what's on the server for
AM reading.
That makes sense.
On Friday, November 05, 2004 at 7:15:49 AM [GMT -0500], Peter Fjelsten
wrote:
AM Actually, it's the other way around. x is the number of messages on
AM the server and which hasn't yet been fully sync'd with what's local.
I believe you - I just find it strange that there would be less e-mail
on
Allie,
On 05-11-2004 13:21, you [AM] wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
AM You now go to another location, start TB! there and the local cache
AM for the folder still contains those messages you deleted. As a
AM result, the local cache contains more messages than are actually on
AM the server. With
On Friday, November 05, 2004 at 7:39:52 AM [GMT -0500], Peter Fjelsten
wrote:
If I move a message from Folder 1 to Folder 2 it now looks like this:
Folder 1 10 9
Folder 2 10 11
The move is carried out server side with the local cache being oblivious
of what happened. The same happens with
Allie,
On 05-11-2004 14:02, you [AM] wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
- this must mean that the folders are not actually sync'ed until
they're selected.
AM This is true if you have the folders set not to sync or the periodic
AM checking is disabled.
Or, that I am faster moving to another older
Hello Martin,
IMAP Server: uw-imap
Server OS: don't know, perhaps RedHat 6.??
Network: LAN(office)/DialUp 21.6kbits(home)
TB! version: latest
Automatically connect to server:
At startup [ /X] (office/home)
When account is selected [ ]
For managing folders [ ]
With any
Thursday, November 4, 2004, 4:28:17 PM, (Internet Time - @977) you wrote:
Hello Martin,
I hope you don't mind me copy and pasting your setup but here's my
setup.
IMAP Server: Fastmail.fm
Server OS: Unknow
Network: LAN
TB! version: 3.0.2.4 build 04/11/2004
Automatically connect to
On Thursday, November 04, 2004 at 5:28:17 PM [GMT -0500], Martin
Webster wrote:
IMAP Server: MDaemon Pro v7.2 (Regular IMAP)
Server OS: Windows XP Pro 7.3
Network: LAN
TB! version: 3.0.2.4 build 04/11/2004
Automatically connect to server:
At startup [X]
When account is selected
Hi Martin!
IMAP Server: Hamster (http://www.tglsoft.de)
Server OS: Windows XP SP2
Network: Local
TB! version: 3.0.2.4
Automatically connect to server:
At startup [ ]
When account is selected [X]
For managing folders [ ]
With any command [ ]
[X] Compress emptied folders
Martin,
I have two:
Home, which I also access from work...
IMAP Server: Mailmax 5.5
Server OS: Windows
Network: Internet (2 MBit connection)
TB! version: 3.0.2.4 build 04/11/2004 (at work this is 3.0.1.33)
Michael Acklin wrote:
These I-[ ] When browsing messages, retrieve only message
text
Could -[ ] except messages smaller than [ ] K Bytes
Not Find -[ ] Use precise counters (needs fast connection)
Like Michael and Bernd, I wasn't able to find these, either. I
had a little
Hello TBBETA,
I've started this thread so those IMAP users who are _not_
experiencing significant performance problems can share how they've
set up TB! I think this will be useful for determining optimum
configurations based on server type, connection etc.
So here's my set-up...
IMAP Server:
24 matches
Mail list logo
