Re[3]: 9.2.1 - final MSI / Toolbar customisations lost?

Hello Andrew, Saturday, July 4, 2020, 12:05:24 PM, you wrote: > Again... Reverting back to the last build with the DevExpress. ...rolling-back to v9.1.18.3 (BETA) x64 introduces a number of AV crashes. Had to manually rename "tbuser.EEF". -- Regards, A

Re[3]: Kinda roadmap ;)

Hello Paul, Wednesday, June 10, 2020, 11:35:45 PM, you wrote: > I have been opening html messages with a browser since v. 1.1. Nothing > like using the right tool for the job. This policy has never failed me > yet... ...Isn't anyone concerned about the concept of "rich HTML" messages here?

Re[3]: The Bat! MSI

Hello all, Saturday, December 1, 2012, Stuart Pye wrote: MM 3) Quick Reply pane is now less intuitive than before, since You removed MM text about Quick Reply and left whole pane empty including dropdown. I agree, except the dropdown has 4 entries. if You do not click to edit field, dropdown

Re[3]: 5.0.10 MSI - thebat_error_20110430.gif (1/1)

Title: Re[3]: 5.0.10 MSI - thebat_error_20110430.gif (1/1) Hi All Courier users, Thursday, May 5, 2011, 8:44:05 AM, Tbbeta wrote: Hi Raymund, Thursday, May 5, 2011, 3:20:23 AM, Raymund wrote: Hi Simon, That brings us back to the original question: which server is that? My server

Re[3]: The Bat! 5.0.4 RC/4 is available for beta testers

Title: Re[3]: The Bat! 5.0.4 RC/4 is available for beta testers Hi all, Thursday, March 31, 2011, 8:31:11 AM, you wrote: However, since I started playing around with view modes, etc. I now find that the Generic View Mode definition keeps disappearing and I get entries with empty names

Re[3]: TB! for Linux

Title: Re[3]: TB! for Linux Hi All, Wednesday, March 30, 2011, 8:41:56 AM, you wrote: 3/30/2011 8:40 AM Hi Maxim, On 3/30/2011 Maxim Masiutin wrote: MM Hello Douglas, MM Tuesday, March 29, 2011, 6:39:18 PM, you wrote: to this superior Operating System, MM http://cgi.ebay.ie/Smart

Re[3]:

Hello all, Wednesday, April 21, 2010, Maxim Masiutin wrote: this build is OK, but after installing this MSI, today I have incorrect icon in taskbar Cannot confirm :( no success with restarting, still unknown icon BTW I can not pin TB to taskbar now, there is option for closing all windows in

Re[3]: The Bat! 4.2.33

Hello Marek, Wednesday, April 07, 2010, 23:46:06, you wrote: skipped Thank you, Marek, you have answered all the questions correctly. -- Best regards, Maxim Masiutinmailto:m...@ritlabs.com Current beta is

Re[3]: 4.2.33.9 MSIs

Hello Maxim, Tuesday, 6 April 2010, 19:47:06, you wrote: Sorry, I was my fault. Please download the correct files again from the same URL(s): http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/intpack_4-2-33.msi http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/thebat_rus_4-2-33.msi

Animated icon in Windows 7 (was: Re[3]: The Bat! 4.2.10 is Compatible for Windows 7)

Hello all, Monday, August 24, 2009, Maxim Masiutin wrote: So why is this bug not going to be fixed? It's not really good enough. Do you have any other application that has animated icon under Windows 7 when pinned? Yes! I know! The Bat! 3.0.1.33 :D Really, I have started this old version and

Re[3]: 4.2.13.5

Hello Maxim, Tuesday, 15 December 2009, 19:07:42, you wrote: Tuesday, December 15, 2009, 19:48:50, you wrote: MM The Bat! 4.2.13.5 ALPHA is available (thanks to Marek Mikus) at MM http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/tb42135.rar 404 error at the moment. Sorry, now it should be

Re[3]: 4.2.12.3

Hello Maxim, Wednesday, November 04, 2009, 12:15:20, you wrote: Are you able to try to delete the account entirely, with all account files and then create it from scratch, so the new folders should be create OK? Oops, do not delete the account, we will issue another fix soon. -- Best regards,

Re[3]: S/MIME

G'Day Maxim, Saturday, 15 August 2009, 00:44:25, you wrote: I just saw that Marcus responded on the BT site, I have tried to reproduce this bug, but couldn't, please see my comment at https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=7573 Just tired again and how I did and still can not choose the new

Re[3]: Cannot write to canvas

Hello, Sunday, May 10, 2009, 1:29:45 PM, you wrote: Maybe that message had remote images that weren't loaded? Once they've loaded over http, the error have stopped? If you exit The Bat!, delete all the files in the cache directory and delete urlmgr.xml and run The Bat! again, will this error

Re[3]: 4.1.11.9 Delayed Messages

Hello Jens, Monday, April 06, 2009, 20:22:09, you wrote: To have a nice Date/Time displayed as creation Date. We do not support the minus sign. Minus is skipped (ignored). We have discussed this opportunity and we won't support past message dates. -- Best regards, Maxim Masiutin

Re[3]: TheBat Beta List DNS Problems (was: [GMX] Re: C121570978 Re: Support Anfrage - Maildomain)

Hello Francis, If you have any doubt, you can check it here: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.mail.the-bat.beta or here (with a small delay): http://www.mail-archive.com/tbbeta@thebat.dutaint.com/ -- Best regards, mse Using The Bat! v4.1.11.2 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3

Re[3]: TB and various IMAP Issues

Hi, All of those years of enduring and reporting IMAP issues, and all that has changed is that the issues have grown _worse_ over the versions? GP Which suggests not negligence but inability to reproduce what you see, GP either by Rit or by many users, which would include myself. You're

Re[3]: Forwarding an HTML mail with added text is faulty

2/6/2009 8:54 AM Hi Kertész, On 2/5/2009 Kertész Vilmos wrote: KV With normal SMTP it works ok. KV Crap is off the table, let's eat :) Alright, I'm hungry! - -- Take Care, Paul Voyager v.4.0.34 on Win2k SP4-Rollup1 5.0.2195 No IMAP OTFE

Re[3]: COLLAPSEFILENAME and EXPANDFILENAME macros

Maxim Masiutin wrote: Which arguments exactly did you pass to these macros? For example F:\TBHelp\bat_pol.chm. The result of both macros is exactly the same (without double quotes, of course). What do you expect to get to get as a result of these macros in your case? I did not know what

Re[3]: Voyager

On Thu, 22 Jan 2009, at 12:19:32 [GMT +0200] (which was 11:19 where I live) Maxim Masiutin wrote: Hello Marek, Thank you, we have renamed it to http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/voyager_install_4-1-11.exe Do I now have an exclusive Voyager? (4.11)? ;-) -- Met vriendelijke

Re: Re[3]: Voyager

On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 12:03:01 +0100, Henk M. de Bruijn henkdebru...@gswot.org wrote: Do I now have an exclusive Voyager? (4.11)? Depends how you define 'exclusive' - I am a member of the same club. -- Dierk [DH² Publishing] www.DH2Publishing.info Writing and Imaging

Re[3]: [UR] (was: 4.1.9.2)

Hi Bob, Hm. I don't really think that they have internet in the afterworld. No, not physically, I am sure. Nice paradoxon. :-) ... It's not a HOT FLASH, it's a POWER SURGE! -- Regards, Gunivortus Using The Bat Vs. 4.1.9.3 under Vista Ultimate 32 bit

Re[3]: Vista 64 issues

On Thu, 15 Jan 2009, at 21:01:57 [GMT +0100] (which was 21:01 where I live) Gunivortus Goos wrote: I have turned odd UAC, so I should be an administrator for real. :-) Right. Since I've turned off UAC I've noticed no such access problems anymore, neither on 32, nor on 64 bit. Even without

Re[3]: the macro under Windows 7

Hello NetVicious, Tuesday, January 13, 2009, 3:13:48 PM, you wrote: Why a mail reader as TB! should have one RSS Reader when there are lots of free RSS Readers: http://www.feedreader.com/ http://en.softonic.com/windows/news-rss-free I want a more better mail reader. For

Re[3]: the macro under Windows 7

1/13/2009 3:44 PM Hi NetVicious, On 1/13/2009 NetVicious wrote: N I want a more better mail reader. For RSS Reader i will use a N dedicated program, it should be better than a addon or a extension for N TB!. Agreed! - -- Take Care, Paul Voyager v.4.0.34 on Win2k SP4-Rollup1

Re[3]: Development for URL manager

Hello NetVicious, I don't think it is necessary. When I hover the mouse on the link the underlying URL is shown - that's good enough for me. I wouldn't want yet another popup. Ritlabs could add one option for enable/disable this warning. Yes, that's possible. -- Vili The Bat 4.1.7 on

Re[3]: Take out the automatic update from the program

Hi Maxim, Thursday, January 8, 2009, 10:06:14 AM, you wrote: Hello Vili, We have put an intermediary download page to our site. Is it OK? Could you please check it now? I just went there and tried it. The intermediate stage page before going to the download page seems to make things very

Re[3]: Take out the automatic update from the program

Hello, Friday, January 9, 2009 at 08:30:39, you wrote : http://www.de2all.de/thebat/Confirmation-DE.html The english webpage please ;-) I want to translate it to spanish too. AOL Me Too /AOL For the french version. -- Regards, Francis mailto:fran...@dhumes.fr

Re[3]: MSI Installer Breaks Existing QuickLaunch Icon

Hello Stuart, A reminder of what Stuart Cuddy typed on: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 at 13:00:40 GMT -0600 SC Does your shortcut have a Start in directory set? Sorry this question was meant for Morton. -- Best regards, Stuartmailto:scu...@mts.net Using The Bat!

Re[3]: msg base destroyed on update to 4.1

Hello Netvicious, Sunday, January 04, 2009, 0:53:25, you wrote: What's the last alpha/beta version of TB! 4.0 that uses the old message database? I just recommend to use v4.0.38 and 4.1.7. -- Best regards, Maxim Masiutin Ritlabs SRL http://www.ritlabs.com/

Re[3]: The Bat! 4.1.7

Bob, Also for those inclined The Cloud of Unknowing about Christian mysticism http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Cloud_of_Unknowing Hello Rick, The intpack required uninstall/reinstall and would not update can't confirm... I uninstalled and reinstalled successfully Ditto, including

Re[3]: 4.1.5 - HTML format ignored when using a html-QT to answer a message

Pressing the response button loads the template without the html-format ?! Do you have Reply to HTML in plain text selected in Options-Preferences-Viewer/Editor? No - I have not. Just tried the most recent 4.1.5.1 version (hoping to see some fixes) and found that the html-template

Re[3]: What's new in The Bat! 4.1.5

Hello Maxim, Tuesday, December 23, 2008, 2:10:57 PM, you wrote: Better handling of the upgrade-downgrade-upgrade scheme meant that if you install 4.1 and then 4.0 and then 4.1 back and so on, than you won't loose the messages due to the new format of the index, it's not related to the

Re: Re[3]: What's new in The Bat! 4.1.5

Additional to that it would be great to include calndaring function e.g. via WebDAV. So it would be possible to synchronize Calendars from Google or Zimbra-Mail-Server. This functionality plus the perfectly working IMAP would make The Bat a real business application. I quote you ! I dream

Re[3]: 4.1 release MSIs

12/22/2008 9:23 AM Hi Maxim, On 12/20/2008 Maxim Masiutin wrote: MM Saturday, December 20, 2008, 18:44:46, you wrote: Installed fine and seems to run well on WinXP SP3 (no OTFE) and on Win2K SP4 (with OTFE). MM I see that Win2K is quite popular in TBBETA. BTW, who did try it MM under Windows

Re[3]: TB 4.1.3: Just a Test, please ignore

12/22/2008 10:10 AM Hi Bob, On 12/21/2008 Bob Riley wrote: BR I always think of alternatives to Gmail (although I have been with BR them since early beta days). Do you have a suggestion for an BR alternative? My backup email since 1997 has been Yahoo Mail... but BR I'd prefer something

Re[3]: TB 4.1.3: Just a Test, please ignore

On Sunday, December 21, 2008, 12:20:09 PM, Bob Riley wrote: If anyone here has used Fastmail, what has your experience with it been? I have been on fastmail for quite a while now. I am very pleased with it. And I certainly wouldn't ever want to go back to POP. The closest to a

Re[3]: In special cases, TB!-Icon and other icons don't appear when Alt+Tab is pressed

sábado, 20 dic 2008 at 03:26, it seems you wrote: Using your argument, you're right. That seems logical. Although I think that the usual Windows user expects to see all his open programs or sub-windows when he presses Alt+Tab, exactly the way he sees them on the task bar. Me personally, I

Re[3]: 4.1 release MSIs

Hi Max, 1.- My 'Add or Remove programs' in Control Panel shows two (2) entries for TB v4.1. I am not sure now if there was only one before this last installation, or not. I should have verified. Can anybody else reproduce it? I have tried to install 4.1 from 4.0.38; and 4.1 did remove the

Re[3]: 4.1 release MSIs

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Sat, 20 Dec 2008, at 19:09:33 [GMT +0200] (which was 18:09 where I live) Maxim Masiutin wrote: 1.- My 'Add or Remove programs' in Control Panel shows two (2) entries for TB v4.1. I am not sure now if there was only one before this last

Re[3]: TB! Again Pauses in the Midst of Message Composition.

12/19/2008 12:30 PM Hi Bob, On 12/18/2008 Bob Riley wrote: BR Sorry I cannot think of any other causes, now, than TB, since it BR happens with no other mail program. I haven't a clue what could cause BR it. BR -- It happens here using Voyager 4.0.34. I can't put my finger on a specific

Re[3]: 4.1.1.1

Hi Maxim, Monday, December 15, 2008, 8:16:28 AM, you wrote: Hello Vilius, Monday, December 15, 2008, 16:55:59, you wrote: Anyway, do you still planning to rewrite IMAP support or was it also canceled? We plan to rewrite it. Good. It is workable now but is not as reliable in my experience

Re[3]: 4.0.39.35

Hello Henk, Sunday, December 7, 2008, 10:44:43 AM, you wrote: I am only using Hunspell and that is working as expected. Thanks. I could even select a dictionary to make it work. I'll take another look. Jerry -- Best regards, Ethanmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re[3]: 4.0.39.35

Hello Henk, Sunday, December 7, 2008, 10:44:43 AM, you wrote: I am only using Hunspell and that is working as expected. My default is not Hunspell. Question, is there a way to get this setting to work? Jerry -- Best regards, Ethanmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re[3]: 4.0.39.29

Hi Maxim, Friday, November 28, 2008, 2:16:31 PM, you wrote: Has this anything do to with the AOL secure login problem from my previous email? This fix was only related to NTLM authenitcation on proxy servers for http image retrieval. This didn't apply to POP3 or SMTP. So when will this issue

Re[3]: 4.0.39.29

Title: Re[3]: 4.0.39.29 Hi Ce, Wednesday, November 26, 2008, 2:23:32 PM, you wrote: yes, when the message list is on, it works OK. I usually turn it off. Off the topic, I just found out I can use Ctrl-F to bring a toolbar to search within the current email. It's nice. Before I was always

Re[3]: messages go missing

Hello Paul, TF We are not talking about a glitch or bug in TB!. TB! is WAD. The TF discussion is about whether the design needs to be changed in order to TF cater to one non-standard email provider. I say no, you say yes. Fine. I agree! It is absurd to adulterate any program so it functions with

Re[3]: Restore Problems

Hi Folks, Similar problems here!!! I foolishly omitted to read many of the last threads on the compatibility between alpha and released versions. I have many thousands of EMails in many folders and have lost several (yet again!) when I restored from an earlier backup! However this is really my

Re[3]: 4.0.34.23

Hello Maxim, Tuesday, November 18, 2008, 9:14:27 AM, you wrote: Could you please provide the screenshot? Please attached screen shot -- Best regards, Ethanmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]attachment:

Re[3]: 4.0.34.24

Hello Maxim, Wednesday, November 19, 2008, 1:13:36, you wrote: Could you please try 4.0.34.24 on this? I've meant 4.0.34.25? -- Best regards, Maxim Masiutin Ritlabs SRL http://www.ritlabs.com/ Current beta is

Re[3]: 4.0.34.25

On Wed, 19 Nov 2008, at 01:38:48 [GMT +0200] (which was 0:38 where I live) Maxim Masiutin wrote: Hello Maxim, Wednesday, November 19, 2008, 1:37:18, you wrote: Up and running, however the former version did not show the mentioned problems using Vista ;-) If you had a non-administrator

Re: Re[3]: 4.0.34.25

Up + running here -- Mackley Italy Current beta is 4.0.34.25 (ALPHA) | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[3]: [4.0.34.21] error message invalid server certificate

On Fri, 14 Nov 2008, at 14:33:18 [GMT +0100] (which was 14:33 where I live) Henk M. de Bruijn wrote: pop.gmail.com 995 smtp.gmail.com 465 Sometimes I manage to fetch new mail but it is impossible to send mail with 4.34.21 With gmail that is.. -- Met vriendelijke groet, Henk M. de Bruijn

Re[3]: 4.0.34.22

On Fri, 14 Nov 2008, at 16:56:27 [GMT +0200] (which was 15:56 where I live) you wrote: Friday, November 14, 2008, 16:41:16, you wrote: Up and running but I am still having the similar error message: FETCH - TLS handshake failure. Invalid server certificate. The certificate or

Re[3]: [4.0.34.21] error message invalid server certificate

Hi Henk, Friday, November 14, 2008, 6:33:18 AM, you wrote: pop.gmail.com 995 smtp.gmail.com 465 Sometimes I manage to fetch new mail but it is impossible to send mail with 4.34.21 With Gmail's IMAP, the same sending server is used, but I have it set for the alternative sending port, 587.

Re[3]:

Title: Re[3]: Hi, Maggie. That's because it's written in invisible ink... Yes. I guess Max is using better ink than mine. -- VBR, Ivan mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current beta is 4.0.34.13 | 'Using TBBETA

Re[3]: Request, decoding utility

V Could we get a utility that would convert ENI, EBD, EBB, etc. encoded V files into non-encoded files? And vice versa. Only the person who V knows the master password could decode these files anyway, right? PM This is a nice idea, could be quite useful. I support this wish. :) Me too! Is

Re[3]: certificate error

Hello Carsten, Monday, September 29, 2008, 11:50:49, you wrote: But The Bat's behaviour is still odd. Why doesn't it let me add the certificate by clicking on the button Add to trusted? With other certificates has worked before. That's because the server didn't sent the certificate during the

Re[3]: 4.0.34.7

Hello Maxim, Wednesday, September 24, 2008, 6:30:09 PM, you wrote: It seems that the timestamping of s/mime is broken since v4.0.34.6, IIRC. Would you please look into it? What timestamp server URL did you specify in Opetions|S/MIME and what kind MS or RFC.

Re[3]: 4.0.34.6

On Thu, 18 Sep 2008, at 12:48:53 [GMT +0600] (which was 8:48 where I live) Ivan Bolhovitinov wrote: Hi, Henk. MM [+] SOCKS5 Version of proxy server Can someone please explain why you would use a proxy server and how you would set it up if you wanted to use one. First: Some internal

Re[3]: SOCKS5 Authentication

Hello Maxim, Thursday, September 18, 2008, 10:39:16 AM, you wrote: Just a clarification; Socks4/Socks5 are used only for fetching/sending e-mail or for downloading images as well? (assuming of course that HTTP Proxy is not enabled) SOCKS is for all types of connections: mail and http. Can we

Re[3]: 4.0.34.6

Hello Ivan, Wednesday, September 17, 2008, 11:23:45 PM, you wrote: MM [+] SOCKS5 Version of proxy server Can someone please explain why you would use a proxy server and how you would set it up if you wanted to use one. IB First: Some internal company networks does not have NAT. No direct IB

Re[3]: 4.0.34.4

Hi, Maxim. What's new in 4.0.34.4 since 4.0.34.3: [-] (#0006866) SOCKS4 Proxy support in Options|Network And Administration|Proxy. 16.09.2008, 16:23:30: FETCH - receiving mail messages !16.09.2008, 16:24:32: FETCH - Connect failed But I have only socks5 on my server. Why do you need

Re[3]: 4.0.34.1

Hi Marcus, Wednesday, September 10, 2008, 1:22:54 PM, you wrote: Hello Bob, http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/tb40341.rar [snip] In the taskmanager I am seeing 2 Bat's running. When I shutdown TheBat both are gone. In Process Explorer I only see on instance of TheBat

Re[3]: 4.0.34 MSI

Hello Martin, Monday, September 8, 2008, 3:43:33 PM, you wrote: Did you install in the same location as previously? No, I didn't. I mean, I didn't install it in a new directory. Sorry for the confusion... -- Best regards, Martinmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re[3]: How to install 4.0.28.3 over 4.0.28.1

Hi Vili, On Monday, August 25, 2008 at 3:37:15 PM you wrote: vv note that neither the passage i quoted above, nor the rest of that document vv say what happens if the unprivileged user attempts to *delete* a file from vv the Program Files folder. vv however, simply trying to overwrite the exe

Re[3]: Voyager 4.0.32.1 [Can't add addresses from editor]

8/25/2008 3:03 PM Hi Henk, On 8/25/2008 Henk M. de Bruijn wrote: I have no little arrow to the right, only to the left which is for adding an address to the address book. HMdB I confirm that from within the editor one can't reach the address book. Confirmed - -- Take Care, Paul Voyager

Re[3]: MSI 4.0.28.3 can not be installed over 4.0.28

I have specified 4.0.30.0 in the Windows Installer to overcome this obstacle. You should ignore that 4th number there. 3 numbers should be enough to show the version changes. -- Vili Current beta is 4.0.28.4 | 'Using TBBETA'

Re[3]: Broken Exchange download

Hello Henk, I have the idea that with this this version downloading messages and removing them from the server takes a lot of time... Yes - recieving and sending messages (exchange via imap) with this beta is slower. Not only slower while I had some different tasks at the background more

Re[3]: Broken Exchange download

On Wed, 20 Aug 2008, at 09:24:11 [GMT +0200] (which was 9:24 where I live) Henk M. de Bruijn wrote: I have the idea that with this this version downloading messages and removing them from the server takes a lot of time... Yes - recieving and sending messages (exchange via imap) with this beta

Re[3]: 4.0.28.2

Hello Maxim, Because a lot of innocent users are suffering from the providers, mainly in the U.S.: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Bat!#Forged_headers Ritlabs should sue the mass mailers' developers. They forge INTENTIONALLY the X-Mailer header that has bad effect on Ritlabs'

Re[3]: Broken Exchange send

With the newest release, I cannot send emails using MAPI (Exchange). Went back to an older one, it works. what doesn't work in newest release? Read the text. Cannot send emails from an Exchange account. -- Vili Current beta is

Re[3]: Broken Exchange send

Title: Re[3]: Broken Exchange send Hi, Friday, August 15, 2008, 10:47:46 PM, you wrote: OV Здравствуйте, Oleg. OV Вы писали 15 августа 2008 г., 21:45:04: With the newest release, I cannot send emails using MAPI (Exchange). Went back to an older one, it works. OV sorry

Re[3]: 4.0.26.6

8/12/2008 11:34 AM Hi Bob, On 8/11/2008 Bob Riley wrote: BR IMAP and drafts seems to be a problem. I don't know if that is a BR Gmail IMAP issue or a TB issue. I have no clue! I apologize to all BR those who got the same message several times. I only sent one, BR myself. BR -- BR

Re[3]: 4.0.24.26 - up running messages

Tuesday, July 8, 2008, 7:48:26 AM, you wrote: Personally, I think it's waste of resources and time to have all of these 'up running' messages. So write a filter to delete them upon receipt. -- The road goes on forever and the party never ends. REK, Jr. Dan Lester, Boise, ID

Re[3]: 4.0.24.26 - up running messages

In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : A Actually, I don't think that it's very helpful at all to a A developer. Up and running on what kind of machine? How much RAM A does it have? What OS is it running? A I'm quite sure that RitLabs does BVTs before they release an A updated

Re[3]: 4.0.24.26 - up running messages

Tuesday, July 8, 2008, 3:48:26 PM, you wrote: A On Monday, July 07, 2008 at 7:17 AM, Thomas wrote: I think UR messages are a good feedback to the developers, and the location adds to the colour, i.e. internationality, of this list. A Actually, I don't think that it's very helpful at all to a

Re[3]: 4.0.24.26 - up running messages

Hi Goncalo, Tuesday, July 8, 2008, 10:58:30 AM, you wrote: In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Or the minutes it takes to download pointless emails... especially if one doesn't have broadband... R and the hours spent uploading cranky and sour replies :) You find it fun... that spirit is

Re[3]: 4.0.24.26

7/7/2008 10:00 AM Hi Goncalo, On 7/7/2008 Goncalo Farias wrote: GF I find interesting that HTML emails are forbidden but pointless ur GF emails aren't... GF They are pointless to the point where people are merely stating that GF they've installed that particular version. Adding the fact

Re[3]: IMAP

Vili, So, when will Ritlabs finish working on these nuances (QT, etc.) and focus on IMAP? I do not think, there will be nuances in templates system only, but agree, IMAP must be focused. Sorry for the misunderstanding. I meant, that for me, QT was good as it was (ok, now better), so

Re[3]: Replying to an HTML mail

In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Now wait a minute! I LIKE blue! :) It's that blocky line. I think the text version quotes would look a lot better. Just an opinion :) BR I like royal blue AND I don't mind the blue squiggly line or the BR thicker line. BR In all honesty, however, I don't

Re[3]: Replying to an HTML mail

Title: Re[3]: Replying to an HTML mail Sunday, June 22, 2008, 3:35:25 PM, you wrote: I think there is some confusion. The blue line is supposed to show up when replying to an HTML mail. The question was why it only showed up for some people. Also there seems to be a general feeling from

Re[3]: Replying to an HTML mail

Title: Re[3]: Replying to an HTML mail Hi Stuart, Sunday, June 22, 2008, 3:35:25 PM, you wrote: Hello Ian, Sunday, June 22, 2008, 4:30:57 PM, you wrote: IAW I have now tried all the settings suggested, but I still see the blue line on the left. I think there is some confusion

Re[3]: 4.0.24.20

Hello Maxim, http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/tb402420.rar Hmm - 4.0.24.20 has doubled file size than 4.0.24.19 - strange... Sorry, I have updated the file. up+running -- Best regards, Alexandr Gert The Bat! 4.0.24.21 + MyGate 2.6.0.171 Plug-ins: MyGateRunner 1.0 | ajs

Re[3]: 4.0.24.20

jueves, 12 jun 2008 at 21:01, it seems you wrote: Sorry, I have updated the file. And this version says it's 4.0.24.21, see my sign ;-) -- /\/ Using The Bat! 4.0.24.21 Professional / \ / \ / Windows XP (5.1.2600 Service Pack 3) /\/ e t \/ i

Re[3]: [5.2] 4.0.24.18

Hello, - I have the problème on the work computer (XP SP3) and the home computer (Vista SP1). I'm sorry, I've made a mistake (Home computer was'nt up-to-date): on Vista SP1, folder view is perfectly correct. -- Regards, Francismailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Message

Re[3]: 4.0.24.18

Hello TB! People, Wednesday, June 11, 2008, 12:40:40 PM, Francis wrote: The problem is not exactly described: - if you have a set of folders, for more than the height of the screen - if you leave TB!, focusing on a folder in the first screen-height: no problem, when TB! opens, the folder

Re[3]: 4.0.24.13

Hello Gunivortus, Sunday, May 25, 2008, 5:28:36 AM, you wrote: I kept getting the attached AV when trying to start version 13. Reverting to 11 or 12 solves the problem! I installed this version with no problem on two machines running XP Pro Service Pack 3. I'll done some attachment test,

Re[3]: 4.0.24.13

Hi Kertész, Saturday, May 24, 2008, 11:49:54 AM, you wrote: The Bat! 4.0.24.13 is available at it does not recognize my thebat registration... not confirmed here. To everybody: Question 0.: Do you have this problem or not? No. Question 1.: Do you use OTFE or not? No. Question 2.:

Re[3]: 4.0.24.13

Hello, The Bat! 4.0.24.13 is available at it does not recognize my thebat registration... not confirmed here. To everybody: Question 0.: Do you have this problem or not? no Question 1.: Do you use OTFE or not? no Question 2.: Which version did you register/when did you buy your TB?

Re[3]: The Bat! and messages count on IMAP folders

In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : AS Don't forget that neither of us is here to please RIT, and that AS does (if not, it ought to) include you. This is not a fanclub. PVN We are here to help. I have never seen helpfulness in rude PVN vulgar language. We are here to provide feedback,

Re[3]: The Bat! and messages count on IMAP folders

Hi Paul, Thank you for introducing a degree of reason into a discussion which will by its very nature, get us absolutely nowhere! I have found Ritlabs most co-operative when I reported problems over many years. That there are problems over many years is part of the real world of software

Re[3]: The Bat! and messages count on IMAP folders

Hi Paul, PVN We are here to help. I have never seen helpfulness in rude PVN vulgar language. Fine, I appreciate that. (Both of it, in case you're wondering. ;-) ) PVN I didn't quarrel with the content. It was the delivery. Ok, let's leave it at that, shall we? -- MfG, Alto

Re[3]: The Bat! 4.0.24.1

Hello Maxim, Friday, May 2, 2008, 3:02:45 PM, you wrote: sorry, but I still get only SHA-1/MD5 in hash algorithm list(internal implementation). Could you please send a screenshot? sure, here it is. The dropdown box only has SHA-1 and MD5 items. -- Best regards, drifthat

Re[3]: The Bat! 4.0.24 MSI

Hello Gunivortus, This is the Windows Installer service that warns the user that The Bat! installation cannot update a component because a program is running. We have no control over it. The empty captions of radio buttons is a bug. Could you please report the problem of empty captions to the

Re[3]: HTML still needs some work

Saturday, April 19, 2008, 7:20:00 AM, you wrote: It seems a shame to dumb down a computer user to the level of a TV watcher. When that happens we'll all be in _big_ trouble! As another computer professional, I understand the feeling. However, it has already happened and will continue to

Re[3]: Damaged folders in Voyager

One utility of great use would be an automated synchronising tool to allow Voyager users to synchronize with The Bat on their home/office PC. Just an idea, that I am using: I use Voyager on desktop and laptop PCs. If I have to go on a trip, copy a directory on the USB stick (and replace

Re[3]: Viewer profiles

JP Thanks, but I tried that. The setting does not stick. When I open a JP new message, it displays the default profile. I also find that the JP preview pane is back to the default profile after re-starting TB. What do you have set in Options/Preferences/Messges/View Modes under When View mode

Re[3]: Problem displaying a mail

I give up :) Do you have MSOffice installed? Yes. As I saved message.html and opened it with notepad - there is a lot of Microsoft crap 'inside' and different specific fonts: @font-face {font-family:Estrangelo Edessa; panose-1:0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0;} I know. The mail was

Re[3]: Problem displaying a mail

4/3/2008 6:03 PM Hi Marek, On 4/3/2008 Marek Szymański wrote: MS As I saved message.html and opened it with notepad - there is a lot of MS Microsoft crap 'inside' and different specific fonts: Therein lies the problem. My life as a consultant has been greatly improved since I swore off M$

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >