Hello Gleason,
On Sun, 2 Feb 2020 11:27:29 -0500 GMT (02-Feb-20, 23:27 +0700 GMT),
Gleason wrote:
> MAU,
>> Hello Thomas,
>>> Yes, the keyboard shortcuts are mentioned in the relevant paragraphs,
>>> but I could not find a summary list of keyboard shortcuts. That would
>>> be helpful.
>>
MAU,
> Hello Thomas,
>> Yes, the keyboard shortcuts are mentioned in the relevant paragraphs,
>> but I could not find a summary list of keyboard shortcuts. That would
>> be helpful.
> Here is one: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/shortcut_eng.html
> It was created 19 years ago and, as I
Hello Thomas,
> Yes, the keyboard shortcuts are mentioned in the relevant paragraphs,
> but I could not find a summary list of keyboard shortcuts. That would
> be helpful.
Here is one: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/shortcut_eng.html
It was created 19 years ago and, as I never use
Hello Thomas,
On Sun, 2 Feb 2020 08:24:10 +0700 GMT (02-Feb-20, 8:24 +0700 GMT),
Thomas Fernandez wrote:
> Hello MAU,
> On Sat, 1 Feb 2020 09:54:38 +0100 GMT (01-Feb-20, 15:54 +0700 GMT),
> MAU wrote:
>> Hello Thomas,
>>> I use this extensively, much faster than searches. To undo the
>>>
Hello MAU,
On Sat, 1 Feb 2020 09:57:45 +0100 GMT (01-Feb-20, 15:57 +0700 GMT),
MAU wrote:
> Hello Thomas,
>> Seriously though, I just searched the Help and couldn't find a summary
>> list of keyboard shortcuts.
> But there is a reference to the use of Alt on the Message List: See:
>
Hello MAU,
On Sat, 1 Feb 2020 09:54:38 +0100 GMT (01-Feb-20, 15:54 +0700 GMT),
MAU wrote:
> Hello Thomas,
>> I use this extensively, much faster than searches. To undo the
>> filtering, I use +<=>.
> Have you tried 'Esc'? :)
LOL! No, thanks.
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Message reply created with
Hello Zygmunt,
On Sat, 1 Feb 2020 11:13:22 +0100 GMT (01-Feb-20, 17:13 +0700 GMT),
Zygmunt Wereszczynski wrote:
> On Saturday, February 1, 2020, at 17:07:46 [UTC-0800] (Saturday, February
> 1, 2020 02:07 my local time) Ira wrote:
Thomas>>> I use this extensively, much faster than searches. To
Hello Thomas,
> Seriously though, I just searched the Help and couldn't find a summary
> list of keyboard shortcuts.
But there is a reference to the use of Alt on the Message List: See:
https://www.ritlabs.com/en/support/help/68/#6771
If you scroll down you will read:
,- [ ]
| Messages
Hello Thomas,
> I use this extensively, much faster than searches. To undo the
> filtering, I use +<=>.
Have you tried 'Esc'? :)
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (Els Poblets (Alicante - Spain)
Using The Bat! Version 9.0.16.6 (BETA) (64-bit) on Windows 10.0 18363
Hello Gleason,
On Fri, 31 Jan 2020 20:06:59 -0500 GMT (01-Feb-20, 08:06 +0700 GMT),
Gleason wrote:
> Thomas,
>> Hello MAU,
>> On Fri, 31 Jan 2020 19:30:12 +0100 GMT (01-Feb-20, 01:30 +0700 GMT),
>> MAU wrote:
I was looking at my mail today and accidently did something that
filtered
Hello Thomas,
Friday, January 31, 2020, 4:08:37 PM, you wrote:
>> You probably clicked Alt+Selected sender. You can use Alt on any column
>> uf the message list to filter on a specific Subject, Date, etc.
Thomas> I use this extensively, much faster than searches. To undo the
Thomas> filtering,
Thomas,
> Hello MAU,
> On Fri, 31 Jan 2020 19:30:12 +0100 GMT (01-Feb-20, 01:30 +0700 GMT),
> MAU wrote:
>>> I was looking at my mail today and accidently did something that
>>> filtered out everything but the emails from the currently selected
>>> sender. View->Display->All Messages got them
Hello MAU,
On Fri, 31 Jan 2020 19:30:12 +0100 GMT (01-Feb-20, 01:30 +0700 GMT),
MAU wrote:
>> I was looking at my mail today and accidently did something that
>> filtered out everything but the emails from the currently selected
>> sender. View->Display->All Messages got them all back but I
Hello Ira,
> I was looking at my mail today and accidently did something that
> filtered out everything but the emails from the currently selected
sender. View->>Display->All Messages got them all back but I can't
> figure out how I did it. Can anyone tell me what I did?
You probably clicked
It is an unfortunate fact of computer life that any software CAN become
corrupted, including TB and including downloads. Why not try restoring to
an earlier version which worked correctly and then install a new download of
the latest version?
A truly clean solution would be exporting
Hello Stuart,
SC Filtering in this latest beta is even more broken than before. As well as
SC filters that only work 9 out of 10 times, one of my filters that used to
work
SC now quit working the way it should. The filter that used to filter to an
archive
SC folder seemed to have lost track
Hello Stefan,
A reminder of what Stefan Tanurkov typed on:
Tuesday, November 06, 2012 at 13:42:58 GMT +0200
ST What exactly you mean by losing track? The only way a filter could
ST lose track of a folder (i.e. the folder's name become unusable) is
ST that the filter configuration file become
Hello Stuart,
Monday, November 5, 2012, 3:24:24 PM, among other things, you wrote:
SC Filtering in this latest beta is even more broken than before. As well as
SC filters that only work 9 out of 10 times, one of my filters that used to
work
SC now quit working the way it should. The filter
Hello RS,
Friday, May 11, 2012, 7:50:11 AM, among other things, you wrote:
RF Hi Roger,
RF I have set messages to be moved to one folder on arrival from a couple
RF of POP3 accounts and then other filters are set to be triggered while
RF Reading the e-mail.
RO I think you are referring
Hello Roger,
I think you are referring to 'Read' filters. In version 5 these filters
are ONLY triggered if you use the 'Smart spacebar' to mark the message as
having been read. Nothing else triggers these filters! IMHO a retrograde
step from version 4.
I fully agree. After
Hello RS,
Friday, May 11, 2012, 4:16:51 AM, among other things, you wrote:
RF Hi,
RF I have set messages to be moved to one folder on arrival from a couple
RF of POP3 accounts and then other filters are set to be triggered while
RF Reading the e-mail.
I think you are referring to 'Read'
Hi Roger,
RF I have set messages to be moved to one folder on arrival from a couple
RF of POP3 accounts and then other filters are set to be triggered while
RF Reading the e-mail.
RO I think you are referring to 'Read' filters. In version 5
RO these filters are ONLY triggered if you
Hello Bat people :-)
I have already posted a similar bug report.
Number 0008682
For me the filter flag mark the message as read does not always work in v5
(and all Betas) as it used to without fail in v4
--
Regards
Steve Harris
Hello Steve,
On Wed, 1 Jun 2011 19:18:18 +0100 GMT (02/Jun/11, 1:18 AM +0700 GMT),
Steve Harris wrote:
SH I have already posted a similar bug report.
This is a different issue, albeit also with filters.
SH Number 0008682
Please always post to complete link, so that it is easy for people to
Hi,
1.STARS IN A NAME
When editing VF properties I always get a message that name is
improper - because it contains characters '*' (* GIVEN_NAME *). Star
is automatically added while VF is created and every time I need to
manually remove them before saving.
2. RE-FILTERING
Re
Hello Maxim,
Monday, May 2, 2011, 10:17:04 PM, you wrote:
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/thebat_pro_5-0-12.msi
Date: 03 May 2011 19:44:55
OS: Windows XP Service Pack 3 build 2600
PhysMemFreeTotal: 1394/2047 MB
VirtMemFreeTotal: 1422/2047 MB
On Wednesday, January 26, 2011, 5:57:44 PM, Rick wrote:
I reloaded 4.2 to be able to view deleted messages and got them back.
actually, viewing deleted messages is working fine in the current
betas
Ok then someone needs to tell me how to do it. I haven't found it anywhere.
Hello Rick,
A reminder of what Rick typed on:
Thursday, January 27, 2011 at 10:13:22 GMT -0500
R Ok then someone needs to tell me how to do it. I haven't found it anywhere.
R How are you doing it?
Click on Folder?Browse Deleted messages. They should show up in the message
list
with a
R Ok then someone needs to tell me how to do it. I haven't found it anywhere.
R How are you doing it?
Click on Folder?Browse Deleted messages. They should show up in the message
list
with a strike-through.
I don't have browse deleted messages and I have never had a message with a
Hallo Rick,
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 15:32:34 -0500GMT (27-1-2011, 21:32 , where I
live), you wrote:
RG I don't have browse deleted messages and I have never had a message with
a strike-through..
See attachment, both active for pop3 and imap accounts
--
Groetjes, Roelof
Moderator.Com found ,..
Hi Rick,
I don't have browse deleted messages and I have never had a message with a
strike-through..
I have only POP accounts, but I am dealing with common folders
I searched for it as well. Thing is it is *not* in the context menu of
a folder but in the folder menu item.
--
Best regards
On Thursday, January 27, 2011, 4:02:53 PM, Raymund Tump wrote:
I searched for it as well. Thing is it is *not* in the context menu of
a folder
would be worthwhile spot for it to be available
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
photo
Hallo Rick,
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 15:32:34 -0500GMT (27-1-2011, 21:32 , where I
live), you wrote:
RG I don't have browse deleted messages and I have never had a message with
a strike-through..
See attachment, both active for pop3 and imap accounts
Thanks Roelof - It works here. I was having
On Wednesday, January 26, 2011, 5:57:44 PM, Rick wrote:
I reloaded 4.2 to be able to view deleted messages and got them back.
actually, viewing deleted messages is working fine in the current
betas
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
anyway), but nothing
PM happens.
Once more replying to myself to say, that it doesn't seem to have
anything to do with *new* filters, but with the re-filter function in
general. I moved some messages from this very list's folder to the
inbox manually and re-filtering did nothing, although the filter had
Hallo Gunivortus,
On Tue, 17 Apr 2007 12:15:43 +0200GMT (17-4-2007, 12:15 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
GG But I don't see in the Sorting Office the Sent folder
GG anymore. And neither the Inbox. There's Ingoing and
GG outgoing. Which means IMO, that filtering the Inbox and
GG the Sent Mail
Hello Gunivortus,
I saw my Sent Mail folder contains a lot of messages.
So I decided to create filters that would move all messages
to specific people I've just created folders for, to those
folders.
You should create Outgoing filters for this. And you may want to
consider 'Group filter'
Hi Roelof,
But you don't want to filter the Inbox and the Sent Mail
folder. You want to filter the incoming and the outgoing mail.
No.
I first don't want to create a filter. If a conversation
keeps restricted to a few mails, then using the Inbox
and Sent Mail folders are sufficient. But when,
Hallo Gunivortus,
On Tue, 17 Apr 2007 12:53:36 +0200GMT (17-4-2007, 12:53 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
GG In previous versions I could filter the Inbox and Sent Mail
GG folder using the Sorting Office. Now it seems only possible
GG doing that by hand. and I won't do that. That's Stone-age
Hi MAU,
You should create Outgoing filters for this. And you may want to
consider 'Group filter' like the one I include below.
TB! Message Filter
beginFilter
UID: [5F3E9A46.01C771F1.43F85958.78B7E4BF]
Name: Office\20OZ
Filter: {\0D\0A\20`12`ERM\20OZ`0`1\0D\0A}
MoveMessage
Hello Gunivortus,
You should create Outgoing filters for this. And you may want to
consider 'Group filter' like the one I include below.
TB! Message Filter
beginFilter
UID: [5F3E9A46.01C771F1.43F85958.78B7E4BF]
Name: Office\20OZ
Filter: {\0D\0A\20`12`ERM\20OZ`0`1\0D\0A}
Hello Rick,
On Fri, 1 Dec 2006 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RG Now, with no changes, several make it to the central inbox but no
RG longer filter to other folders. Re-Filter the folder and they move
RG on respectively so the filters are correct (and they are all set to
RG process other
Hallo Roland,
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 18:34:58 +0100GMT (19-1-2006, 18:34 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
RB Instead of Eingang they are set to Inbox and instead of
RB Versandt they are set to Sent!
Seems to me that it's working okay. No matter whether I'm using the
Dutch, German or English
Hi Roelof,
on Thursday, January 19, 2006 at 19:04 you wrote in message
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
among others:
RB Instead of Eingang they are set to Inbox and instead of
RB Versandt they are set to Sent!
Seems to me that it's working okay. No matter whether I'm using the
Dutch, German or English
Hello Manuel.
--On 14 June 2005 23:07 +0200 you wrote about Re: OT: Missing references
(Was: Re: Filtering issue):
This doesn't, you're right.
Of course it didn't thread, I made sure of it for demonstration purposes.
--
Tony.
M
pgpWZXeRwsdsc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi Tony,
-- 15.06.2005 08:49 +0100:
This doesn't, you're right.
Of course it didn't thread, I made sure of it for demonstration purposes.
LOL :D
--
Manuel, http://www.manuel-breitfeld.de
Current beta is 3.5.26 | 'Using TBBETA'
Hello Manuel.
--On 15 June 2005 10:17 +0200 you wrote about Re: OT: Missing references
(Was: Re: Filtering issue):
This doesn't, you're right.
Of course it didn't thread, I made sure of it for demonstration purposes.
LOL :D
This threading problem The Bat has seems to be spreading. Poor
Hi Tony,
-- 15.06.2005 10:02 +0100:
Of course it didn't thread, I made sure of it for demonstration
purposes.
LOL :D
This threading problem The Bat has seems to be spreading. Poor Xav is
having trouble with it now, he'll soon be in Boris's Tony List :)
Yes, and poor Xav can't just
Hello Manuel.
--On 15 June 2005 11:13 +0200 you wrote about Re: OT: Missing references
(Was: Re: Filtering issue):
...but Tony, what have you done?
I just made the bed and vacuumed the carpets why?
We're currently in the 3.5.26 don't start thread.
Your point being? :)
--
Tony.
M
Hello Tony,
This threading problem The Bat has seems to be spreading. Poor Xav is
having trouble with it now, he'll soon be in Boris's Tony List :)
But Xav's 'problem' is totally different to the one you had.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.5.25 on
Hello MAU.
--On 15 June 2005 12:21 +0200 you wrote about Re: OT: Missing references
(Was: Re: Filtering issue):
But Xav's 'problem' is totally different to the one you had.
Don't quite see how, his don't thread, mine didn't and you pinpointed it to
reference headers for both of us.
--
Tony
Hello Tony,
But Xav's 'problem' is totally different to the one you had.
Don't quite see how, his don't thread, mine didn't and you pinpointed it to
reference headers for both of us.
Yes, but totally different. If I recall correctly, the threading problem
with your messages was a
Hallo Ciprian,
On Tue, 14 Jun 2005 16:25:45 +0300GMT (14-6-2005, 15:25 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
CT I have an active filter, configured as manual. When I re-filter a folder,
CT the filter is applied even when I don't check manual filters only. Is
CT this a bug ?
No, that's no bug. What
Hallo Roelof,
On Tue, 14 Jun 2005 15:57:40 +0200GMT (14-6-2005, 15:57 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
RO The effect of checking 'manual filter only' is that all active filters
RO are being used and not only those with the manual bit set.
This should have read 'unchecking' :-(
--
Groetjes,
CT I have an active filter, configured as manual. When I re-filter a
CT folder, the filter is applied even when I don't check manual filters
CT only. Is this a bug ?
RO The effect of checking 'manual filter only' is that all active filters
RO are being used and not only those with the manual bit
unpleasant.
It is working as designed. When re-filtering, all active filters will be
applied whether they are manual or not. That is, of course, unless you
select Manual filters only.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10 on Windows 2000 5.0 Service
Hallo Ciprian,
On Tue, 14 Jun 2005 18:58:09 +0300GMT (14-6-2005, 17:58 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
CT I didn't see that behavior in older versions of TB! (3.1)
Just checked on another system, that still has 2.12 running. That
performs just as I explained.
--
Groetjes, Roelof
and that is
Hallo Ciprian,
CT I didn't see that behavior in older versions of TB! (3.1)
Just checked on another system, that still has 2.12 running. That
performs just as I explained.
Roelof is right. It works as it should: you have filters that can
be active/nonactive and manual/automatic, and you can
Hello All,
first the high traffic on list (which forced me to mark 1.200 messages
as read) and then this: missing references and no trout. Is it just me,
who is disturbed by this? Or did you do already what I'm doing now - add
Vili to the tony - filter.
--
Regards,
Boris Anders,
Hi Boris,
-- 14.06.2005 20:37 +0200:
Or did you do already what I'm doing now - add Vili to the tony -
filter.
Just in case you really have this tony - filter. Tony has changed his
provider and actually uses great Fastmail. All messages by Tony thread fine
now.
--
Manuel,
--On Tuesday, June 14, 2005 21:18:24 +0200 Manuel Breitfeld
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just in case you really have this tony - filter. Tony has changed his
provider and actually uses great Fastmail. All messages by Tony thread
fine now.
I had no intention of telling him that, I'd rather he
and then this: missing references and no trout. Is it just me,
who is disturbed by this? Or did you do already what I'm doing now
- add
Vili to the tony - filter.
Whatever you want man, whatever you want...
Can you possibly imagine that sometimes someone is FORCED to use
other shitty email
On Tuesday 14 June 2005 20:18, Manuel Breitfeld wrote:
Just in case you really have this tony - filter. Tony has changed his
provider and actually uses great Fastmail. All messages by Tony thread fine
now.
In fact, it's not too hard to reverse the threading process.
--
Tony.
KM
--On Tuesday, June 14, 2005 19:56:28 + Vili [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you possibly imagine that sometimes someone is FORCED to use
other shitty email client, not TB! ??? Can you??
Some people don't give a damn if your having problems. Just so long as
their desktop looks pretty with
Can you possibly imagine that sometimes someone is FORCED to use
other shitty email client, not TB! ??? Can you??
Some people don't give a damn if your having problems. Just so long as
their desktop looks pretty with perfect threading, nice coloured
icons and
God forbid if they should have
Hello Tony,
Tony Boom wrote (in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Just in case you really have this tony - filter. Tony has changed his
provider and actually uses great Fastmail. All messages by Tony thread fine
now.
In fact, it's not too hard to reverse the threading process.
True, in fact it's
Hello Manuel,
Manuel Breitfeld wrote (in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Or did you do already what I'm doing now - add Vili to the tony -
filter.
Just in case you really have this tony - filter.
Believe me, I have.
Tony has changed his provider and actually uses great Fastmail.
Makes my filter
Hi Boris,
-- 14.06.2005 22:56 +0200:
All messages by Tony thread fine now.
Sure? mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This doesn't, you're right. Sent by *great* K-Mail - I'm really not that
involved, I can comment things here.
Everybody is free to delete messages, nobody needs to justify his
On Wednesday, May 04, 2005 at 1:57:29 PM [GMT -0500], Cees wrote:
filtering in IMAP account still doesn't work. Just created a filter,
and there are at least 20 mails complying to the string, but they only
get added to a queue and nothing is happening; they all remain in the
inbox.
Is this
On 2005-04-07 at 21:32:06 Richard Wakeford wrote:
I would like to reject all messages with attachments over a certain size
from being downloaded but to leave them on the server so I can see who
Account | Properties | Mail Management | check Receive header only if
message size is greater than
Hello Richard,
On Thu, 7 Apr 2005 21:32:06 +0200GMT Richard Wakeford wrote:
RW I would like to reject all messages with attachments over a certain size
RW from being downloaded but to leave them on the server so I can see who
RW they are from as The Bat! connection centre doesn't tell you who
whyisthatfilteringemailwithIMAP-accountisnotworking?
It'sjustanordinaryfilter,butnomatterwhat:itwon'twork.
I can confirm that here too. Also I created a new folder for
mailing list messages that did not get created on the server.
My extensive imap folder hierarchy does not get loaded when
TB
Hey Cees,
yesterday (on 03/18/2005 at 23:30) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
why is that filtering email with IMAP-account is not working?
Hmm, mine are working. A few are:
Incoming:
- Moving into folder if Sender is in AB.
Outgoing:
- Moving into folder if all recipients are in AB.
- Moving into
Hello Jan,
virtual folder 2 for msgs w color A doesn't seem to pull in those
that also happen to be flagged.
It should. Have you tried a manual Refresh?
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.0.9.7 Return (pre-beta) on Windows 2000 5.0 Service Pack 4
On Thursday, February 10, 2005, 14:35, Marcus Ohlström wrote:
In addition to the current possibility to filter VFs by message age, I
would like to be able to filter based on how many days ago a message
was received.
Better late then never:
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4264
Hello Marcus,
Thursday, February 10, 2005, 3:35:24 PM, among other things, you wrote:
MO In addition to the current possibility to filter VFs by message age, I
MO would like to be able to filter based on how many days ago a message was
MO received.
If you use two filters, one for 'AGE'
On Thursday, February 10, 2005, 19:13, Roger Phillips wrote:
MO In addition to the current possibility to filter VFs by message
MO age, I would like to be able to filter based on how many days ago a
MO message was received.
If you use two filters, one for 'AGE' greater than, 'AND' and a second
Roger,
On 10-02-2005 19:13, you [RP] wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
RP If you use two filters, one for 'AGE' greater than, 'AND' and a
RP second one for 'AGE' less than, should give you only mail a
RP particular day.
Am I the only one who would also like to be able to select hours for
age?
--
On Thursday, February 10, 2005, 19:57, Peter Fjelsten wrote:
RP If you use two filters, one for 'AGE' greater than, 'AND' and a
RP second one for 'AGE' less than, should give you only mail a
RP particular day.
Am I the only one who would also like to be able to select hours for
age?
Would be
Marcus,
On 10-02-2005 20:48, you [MO] wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
MO Well, are there any BT items, or should I add two (I'll do the work
MO for you Peter)?
I don't know, but please add the wish - it'll will save me some
typing... :)
--
greeting Best regards /greeting
author Peter
Hæ!
Friday, December 24, 2004, 16:52, Thorvald Neumann wrote:
Ok, to whom do I have to mail my problem...? It is quite annoying.
I now collected a few emails, which sneak past my filters.
Anybody know to which developer I could send those for inspection and
to clarify if there is a bug within
Hæ!
Friday, December 24, 2004, 08:32, Thorvald Neumann wrote:
I will move the account filter to the commons... Hopefully this
helps...
The problem is still there.
At the moment, the filter moves 8 out of 10 spam mails to the junk
folder. ;(
I have no idea why this behaviour started two or
Hello Thorvald Neumann everyone else,
on 24-Dez-2004 at 10:00 you (Thorvald Neumann) wrote:
The problem is still there.
At the moment, the filter moves 8 out of 10 spam mails to the junk
folder. ;(
I have no idea why this behaviour started two or three days ago.
Well, since it only
Hæ!
Friday, December 24, 2004, 10:15, Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
Well, since it only happens on new mail retrieval and works when you
re-filter manually, maybe the dev's should really look at those messages
that slip thru...
I have now setup two global filters, one looking for
Hæ!
Very, very strange...
The messages now get somehow marked with a colour group which I
certainly did not define (but are not moved nor marked as read). See
the attached PNGs.
I am not sure where the light blue colouring comes from. *puzzled*
--
Kveðja, Thorvald Neumann |
Hæ!
Friday, December 24, 2004, 14:27, Thorvald Neumann wrote:
I am not sure where the light blue colouring comes from. *puzzled*
I just noticed, when I read such a mail, it will change the colour
to the specific SPAM colouring.
I just checked my colour group settings and there are the same
Hæ!
Friday, December 24, 2004, 10:15, Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
Well, since it only happens on new mail retrieval and works when you
re-filter manually, maybe the dev's should really look at those messages
that slip thru...
Ok, to whom do I have to mail my problem...? It is quite annoying.
--
Hæ!
This happens today, too. :-(
Some mails are filtered, some are not.
Anybody else noticed this behaviour?
--
Kveðja, Thorvald Neumann | http://www.aesir.de/
| The Bat! v3.0.2.10 Professional K9 v1.28
| Windows 2000 SP4 (v5.0.2195)
Hello Thorvald Neumann everyone else,
on 23-Dez-2004 at 09:54 you (Thorvald Neumann) wrote:
This happens today, too. :-(
Some mails are filtered, some are not.
Anybody else noticed this behaviour?
I'm (back) using K9 (again), just like you... my condition in the spam
filter is
Header
Hæ!
Thursday, December 23, 2004, 11:47, Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
(notice I have starts with as condition) - but no other difference.
I changed it to starts with...
BTW, using manual refiltering (with contain or starts with), the
messages get filtered as intended.
--
Kveðja, Thorvald Neumann
Hæ!
Here is a snip from the log, showing my filter works, but one message
(the one from marvin ochs) is not filtered:
23.12.2004, 09:33:38: FETCH - Received message from Evelyn Calhoun [EMAIL
PROTECTED], size: 6274 bytes, subject: [SPAM] Never been esaier
23.12.2004, 09:33:38: FETCH -
Hello Thorvald Neumann everyone else,
on 23-Dez-2004 at 12:03 you (Thorvald Neumann) wrote:
BTW, using manual refiltering (with contain or starts with), the
messages get filtered as intended.
Uh. Now thats odd. Is it a common filter, or an account filter?
--
Best regards,
Alexander
Hæ!
Thursday, December 23, 2004, 13:51, Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
Uh. Now thats odd. Is it a common filter, or an account filter?
Account filter.
--
Kveðja, Thorvald Neumann | http://www.aesir.de/
| The Bat! v3.0.2.10 Professional K9 v1.28
| Windows 2000 SP4 (v5.0.2195)
Hello Thorvald Neumann everyone else,
on 23-Dez-2004 at 15:35 you (Thorvald Neumann) wrote:
Uh. Now thats odd. Is it a common filter, or an account filter?
Account filter.
And, are the messages touched by a common filter before?
--
Best regards,
Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ
Hæ!
Thursday, December 23, 2004, 19:03, Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
And, are the messages touched by a common filter before?
Normally not.
[Another two spam mails just slipped by... ]
I now disabled all common filters (just two so far) and let's see if
this helps.
If this does not help, I will
Hello Thorvald Neumann everyone else,
on 23-Dez-2004 at 19:07 you (Thorvald Neumann) wrote:
If this does not help, I will move the spam filter to the common
filter list and watch this... ;)
Thats how I do it (the filter that watches K9's header is a common filter).
Since you can manually
Hæ!
So, I had all my common filters disabled and some SPAM mails are
slipping by the account filter... ;(
I will move the account filter to the commons... Hopefully this
helps...
--
Kveðja, Thorvald Neumann | http://www.aesir.de/
| The Bat! v3.0.2.10 Professional K9 v1.28
| Windows 2000 SP4
Hello Chris,
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 10:36:33 -0400GMT Chris wrote:
C example I want to move all messages with .exe attachments to a
C different folder. Is this possile?
yes, should be easy. Create a new filter with the condition File
matching mask exe is attached and under actions choose the
On 2004-10-10 at 17:56:16 Jan Rifkinson wrote:
Mailing-List: list [EMAIL PROTECTED]; contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can use any of the Mailing-List, Delivered-To or
List-Unsubscribe
On Monday, September 22, 2003, at 1:51:27 PM, Mogens Holst has created
a mail:
Is is possible to filter on the content of the html part?
Or on RAW DATA, perhaps?
That'd be really nice. The whole message, headers, raw body,
everything, not even uu-decoded or anything.
One vote from me. Next!
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
