SOT: Options and user control

2000-05-16 Thread Tom Plunket
TP Ever seen message boxes with a "do not show this warning again" TP checkbox? That adds a little more "bloat" but doesn't slow you down TP any more. p Right, it's called a "switch." In some programming languages, perhaps. Using the Win32 API in C or C++, it's called a checkbox. p And the

Re: No Subject warning

2000-05-16 Thread Tom Plunket
JDH I wonder what the Good Net Keeping Seal of Approval (GNKSA) JDH recommendations say about this. I can't find it but I'm pretty sure that it requires a warning for a blank subject and recommends not allowing it at all, but this is for Usenet afterall... -tom! -- Hopin' this said

Re[2]: Subject line warnings

2000-05-16 Thread phil
Greetings Januk! First I had to TRACK DOWN "(No Subject)" and which technically *IS* a subject. If it really was NO SUBJECT then there would be Subject="" Which still isn't the case. Which is why Okay man, I got 5:870 messages with "(No Subject) in TBUDL. That's FIVE out of EIGHTHUNDRED

Re[2]: No Subject warning

2000-05-16 Thread phil
Greetings John! First I had to TRACK DOWN "(No Subject)" and which technically *IS* a subject. If it really was NO SUBJECT then there would be Subject="" Which still isn't the case. Which is why Okay man, I got 5:870 messages with "(No Subject) in TBUDL. That's FIVE out of EIGHTHUNDRED

Re[2]: No Subject warning

2000-05-16 Thread phil
Greetings Jast! On Monday, May 15, 2000 at 07:13:04 GMT +0200 (which was 10:13 PM where you think I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: J Morning John De Hoog, Ordinary users don't oppose it. Ritlabs needs to listen to ordinary users, else it will find itself with a shrinking piece of a

Re[2]: No Subject warning

2000-05-16 Thread phil
Greetings John! Well the Good Net Keeping Seal of Approval, does not set the internet Standards, the RFC's do. Which if you look up RFC 822, you see that the Subject is treated as a TEXT STRING. And to FORCE your BS on my MESSAGE is not what the RFC's SAY. The GNKSA is the BS-DOO-DOO-GNKSA as

DEAD HORSE (was Re: No Subject warning)

2000-05-16 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
Hi Tom, On 16 May 2000 at 23:57:31 GMT -0700 (which was 07:57 where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject of "No Subject warning": JDH I wonder what the Good Net Keeping Seal of Approval (GNKSA) JDH recommendations say about this. I can't find it but I'm

Re: No Subject warning

2000-05-16 Thread John De Hoog
phil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: BTW-I don't see you in there. As of 9-DEC-1999 Yeah, I come and stay just long enough to see what the cray-zees are up to. \^^/ Get a life, dude. -- John De Hoog, Tokyo [EMAIL PROTECTED] Japanese email software: http://dehoog.org/html/j-email.html --

Re: No Subject warning

2000-05-16 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
Hi phil, On 16 May 2000 at 00:57:31 GMT -0700 (which was 08:57 where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject of "No Subject warning": my (censored) TEXT to say "" then that is what I want. I don't want a NAG SCREEN, or something MODIFYING MY (censored)

Re: Subject line warnings

2000-05-16 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
Hi phil, On 16 May 2000 at 00:54:31 GMT -0700 (which was 08:54 where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject of "Subject line warnings": That's FIVE out of EIGHTHUNDRED AND SEVENTY MESSAGES! This is not "Frequent!" This is not a widespread problem! That was

Re: SOT: Options and user control

2000-05-16 Thread phil
Greetings Tom! To my knowledge TB is written in Delphi, if asked I'd say Delphi. The Newbie isn't going to send out an unusually high amount of no subject messages, or WE WOULD HAVE A HIGHER RATIO THAN 6 in 100 Automatically, Putting %ME into the SUBJECT LINE is NOT RFC COMPLIANT! It's a

Re[2]: Subject line warnings

2000-05-16 Thread phil
Greetings Marck! On Tuesday, May 16, 2000 at 09:24:45 GMT +0100 (which was 1:24 AM where you think I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: MDP Hi phil, MDP On 16 May 2000 at 00:54:31 GMT -0700 (which was 08:54 where I MDP live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject MDP of

Re[2]: No Subject warning

2000-05-16 Thread phil
Greetings Marck! On Tuesday, May 16, 2000 at 09:27:13 GMT +0100 (which was 1:27 AM where you think I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: MDP Hi phil, MDP On 16 May 2000 at 00:57:31 GMT -0700 (which was 08:57 where I MDP live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject MDP of

PGP 6.5.3 and importing keys

2000-05-16 Thread Allie Martin
Hi, I'm having trouble importing keys that are pasted into messages. When I select Specials | Import key, nothing happens. In fact, what I have to do is select Specials | Check digital signature. When it checks the signature, it also imports the key at that point. However, if the key is sent

Re: PGP 6.5.3 and importing keys

2000-05-16 Thread Chris van Honk
Hello Allie, I always open PGP keys, Copy the public key text, right click in the very bottom of the pgp keys window, and paste. This will give you an import key dialogue. -- guano, :-) Chris Honk [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP key [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to http://www.vanhonk.com/key/

People's Choice Award- another opportunity to vote for The Bat!

2000-05-16 Thread Mike Harlos
Hi, Just thought I'd let you know of the People's Choice Award of the Shareware Industry Awards 2000. It's sponsored by TUCOWS at: http://www.tucows.com/sic.html This is another opportunity to vote for The Bat! -- Regards, Mike Using The Bat! 1.42f under Windows 95 4.0

Did it changed in forwarding msgs?

2000-05-16 Thread DINH Frederic
Bonjour ! Since I upgraded to TB 1.42, the msg i forward are not readable by the recipients using Netscape Messenger or Outlook. I checked the MIME standard for forwarding. Some recipients said Netscape launched MS Exchange to read the attached piece. I don't use it so the Netscape on my PC

Ability to have French Accenting?

2000-05-16 Thread Nick Andriash
Hi Everyone, This is a letter I received from a member of my PGP-Basics List, which I received off-List. He recently made the switch over to TB! and although I've given him instructions of joining this List, I'm hoping someone here can help him with his problem. Here then is his letter: I

8 Bit vs 7 Bit Encoding?

2000-05-16 Thread Nick Andriash
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I'm involved in an ongoing discussion as to why TB!, amongst other Mail Clients, always reports a very high percentage PGP Signature generated via Eudora, as "bad", indicating that the message content had been altered sometime after the message was

List Moderators

2000-05-16 Thread Nick Andriash
On Tuesday, May 16, 2000, 1:27:13 AM, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote: my (censored) TEXT to say "" then that is what I want. I don't want a NAG SCREEN, or something MODIFYING MY (censored) MESSAGES! I have to say something moderatorial here about profanity and shouting being unacceptable

Re: Ability to have French Accenting?

2000-05-16 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Nick, Tuesday, May 16, 2000, 6:20:10 PM, you wrote: I occasionally receive/send messages in French which requires the use of accented characters. When I receive a reply (with my message quoted) my original text and the reply do not

Re: PGP 6.5.3 and importing keys

2000-05-16 Thread Oliver Sturm
Hi Allie Martin, On Tuesday, May 16, 2000 at 10:58:29 AM you wrote: Hi, I'm having trouble importing keys that are pasted into messages. When I select Specials | Import key, nothing happens. In fact, what I have to do is select Specials | Check digital signature. When it checks the

Re: 8 Bit vs 7 Bit Encoding?

2000-05-16 Thread Peter Steiner
Hello Nick On Tue, 16 May 2000 09:41:11 -0700, Nick Andriash wrote: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit as seen on TB's headers Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit as seen on the header from Eudora 4.3.2 Beta 6 Would that difference have anything to do with why TB! reports those PGP signatures

Virtual desktop managers and The Bat!

2000-05-16 Thread Christian Dysthe
Hello TBUDL, I have used several virtual desktop managers with The Bat! and I am having the same problem: If I have The Bat! minimized and close the virtual window manager The Bat!'s main window is "gone" for ever after. I do actually have to uninstall and resinstall to get my main

Re: Ability to have French Accenting?

2000-05-16 Thread Alberto Almagioni
On Tue, 16 May 2000 09:20:10 -0700GMT (16/05/2000, 18.20 +0100GMT), Nick Andriash wrote: Hi Everyone, This is a letter I received from a member of my PGP-Basics List, which I received off-List. He recently made the switch over to TB! and although I've given him instructions of joining this

Re[2]: (No Subject)

2000-05-16 Thread Julio Cesar da Costa
Hello Januk, On Monday, May 15, 2000 at 23:31:35, you wrote: ... JA All you need to do is delete the appropriate value from your registry JA and TB will automatically import your old message bases. The JA appropriate registry setting is under, JA HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\RIT\The Bat!

Re[2]: Subject line warnings

2000-05-16 Thread Jamie Dainton
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 */Reply Tuesday, May 16, 2000, 4:22:19 AM, you wrote: JA Hello phil, JA On Monday, May 15, 2000 at 19:57:44 GMT -0700 (which was 7:57 PM JA where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: I have 870 messages in TBUDL and not one of them is lacking

Re: PGP 6.5.3 and importing keys

2000-05-16 Thread Jamie Dainton
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 */Reply Tuesday, May 16, 2000, 9:58:29 AM, you wrote: AM Hi, AM I'm having trouble importing keys that are pasted into messages. AM When I select Specials | Import key, nothing happens. In fact, what I have AM to do is select Specials | Check

Re: PGP 6.5.3 and importing keys

2000-05-16 Thread Allie Martin
On Tue, 16 May 2000 22:33:30 +0100, Jamie Dainton wrote: AM I'm having trouble importing keys that are pasted into messages. -- snip -- AM. I had the same problem importing your key. It seems to be a problem if the mail with the key is PGP signed. I have no problem with the PGP signed

Re[2]: PGP 6.5.3 and importing keys

2000-05-16 Thread Alexander A. Gomanyuk
Hello Oliver and Batmans, I'm having trouble importing keys that are pasted into messages. When I select Specials | Import key, nothing happens. In fact, what I have to do is select Specials | Check digital signature. When it checks the signature, it also imports the key at that point.

Re: Virtual desktop managers and The Bat!

2000-05-16 Thread Jast
Morning Christian Dysthe, If I have The Bat! minimized and close the virtual window manager The Bat!'s main window is "gone" for ever after. I do actually have to uninstall and resinstall to get my main window back when I start The Bat!. When I start The Bat the ticker and the splash

Re: Ability to have French Accenting?

2000-05-16 Thread Januk Aggarwal
Hello Nick, On Tuesday, May 16, 2000 at 09:20:10 GMT -0700 (which was 9:20 AM where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: Hi Everyone, This is a letter I received from a member of my PGP-Basics List, which I received off-List. He recently made the switch over to TB! and although I've given

Macro Utility Question

2000-05-16 Thread Januk Aggarwal
Hello, I was wondering, is it possible for the macros to be called directly while editing a message? For example, suppose I want to clear the body of my current message. Currently I have two options. I can set up a QuickTemplate with one macro, %blank, or I can select all of the text and