Hello Jan!
On Sunday, July 28, 2002 at 3:36:14 AM you wrote:
My goodness, what is RIT Labs thinking? They're nuts if
they don't put a stop to this.
Huh?
Should they forbid people (in this case marketers) to evaluate their
opportunities? The same arguments we have to use TB! apply to
Hello Adam,
Speaking of which, what proportion of folks do skip threads entirely
on such basis? Versus reading all mail.
I do.
I'd be curious. And I wonder too what ya do with threads with a bunch
of Unread status indicators, sort of glaring at you. And liable to
pull you back towards
Hello Arjan,
I think it is the duty of every subscriber to read every message
that is being potsted on TBUDL.
Do you read the whole newspaper everyday or just those news/articles
whose headlines catch your attention?
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat!
Hello Sudip,
SP Things are not that self-explanatory. You still have to change your
SP TB! settings to route the incoming mails through NAV's POPROXY module.
SP See my message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I never once had to do that. I only turned on email scanning in NAV
Hallo Arjan,
On Sun, 28 Jul 2002 03:56:08 +0200GMT (28-7-02, 3:56 +0200GMT, where I
live), you wrote:
AdG I think it is the duty of every subscriber to read every message
AdG that is being potsted on TBUDL. If only to avoid the possibility
Well, that explains why you can be found posting
Hallo Adam,
On Sat, 27 Jul 2002 22:01:46 -0230GMT (28-7-02, 2:31 +0200GMT, where I
live), you wrote:
A Speaking of which, what proportion of folks do skip threads
A entirely on such basis?
I do. I've got a very limited amount of time, that I'd prefer not to
spend on subjects that don't
Hi Dierk,
On Sun, 28 Jul 2002 08:19:52 +0200 GMT (Jul 28, 12:04 my local time),
you [DH] wrote
DH It's a bit like outlawing chef's knifes because they could be used
DH to murder ones spouse.
or the cliché Guns don't kill, people do
--
Cheers,
Sudip For PM:- mailto:[EMAIL
Hi Adam,
on Sat, 27 Jul 2002 22:01:46 -0230GMT (28.07.02, 02:31 +0200GMT here),
you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
A what proportion of folks do skip threads entirely on such basis? Versus
A reading all mail.
I sometimes have to. When I haven't had the time to read the
Hi Kurgan,
On Sat, 27 Jul 2002 22:45:44 -0500 GMT (Jul 28, 09:30 my local time),
you [KLc] wrote
KLc I never once had to do that. I only turned on email scanning in
KLc NAV and it worked. Never had to do anything to TB. (I'm referring
KLc to NAV 2001 and prior.)
I find that incredulous !
Hello Adam,
On Sunday, July 28, 2002 at 2:31:46 AM you [A] wrote (at least in
part):
A Speaking of which, what proportion of folks do skip threads entirely
A on such basis?
Me. For example. If there's a thread I'm absolutely not interested in
I do remember the subject (most times) and if there
Hello Arjan,
On Sunday, July 28, 2002 at 3:56:08 AM you [AdG] wrote (at least in
part):
AdG I think it is the duty of every subscriber to read every message
AdG that is being potsted on TBUDL.
No. Simply No. Period. Nowhere is written I'm in duty to read every
mail coming through this list.
Hello TBUDL listers,
I've been following the thread about anti-spam measures and I too wanted
to create a separate address book for spam addresses (actually, I
thought it might be handy to have Work vs Personal AB too).
Yet, no matter what I did, I could not get to have two separate
Hello TBUDL listers,
I'm finally enjoying my TB! and it's time for a few final touches...
I've tried in vain to reduce the size of the font in the Message List
window which seems to be a _huge_ 12 or 14 point size.
I went into Options/Message List colors Fonts, changed it to 10
Hi Dierk.
At 2:19 AM on Sunday, July 28, 2002 you wrote the following
about [As if we didn't have ENOUGH problems with ISPs...]:
DH Should they forbid people (in this case marketers) to
DH evaluate their opportunities?
Of course not. They should just make it known that they
don't approve.
Hello Sergey,
Sunday, July 28, 2002, 3:30:41 PM, you wrote:
SU Dear Joyce,
SU Sunday, July 28, 2002, 3:27:50 PM, you wrote:
JS Hello TBUDL listers,
JS I've been following the thread about anti-spam measures and I too wanted
JS to create a separate address book for spam addresses
Dear Joyce,
Sunday, July 28, 2002, 4:56:28 PM, you wrote:
SU Open AB.
SU Menu: New AB - enter name (SPAM for examle)
SU stored in a file - enter file name ( spam)
JS Thanks... but that's exactly what I did, and I STILL get two
JS identical and interdependent files!
JS Any ideas?
Dear Joyce,
Sunday, July 28, 2002, 4:56:28 PM, you wrote:
JS I've been following the thread about anti-spam measures and I too wanted
JS to create a separate address book for spam addresses
I do not think, that it is good idea. I have very few cases when spam
address is the same. Most of
Hello Sergey,
Sunday, July 28, 2002, 4:00:13 PM, you wrote:
SU Strange... I just have made new AB - it is independent.
SU You are sure, that files for two AB are different?
SU Because when i made new AB (test) and when it asks for filename - set spam
SU - i have situation described by you.
Dear Joyce,
Sunday, July 28, 2002, 5:23:52 PM, you wrote:
JS OK, I *think* I found what's wrong...
JS When I choose open address book I actually SEE the three different
JS files: The Bat!, Spamz, and Test; *BUT*, no matter *what* I choose,
JS what comes up is an Ab called Personal Address
On Sun, 2002-07-28 at 09:09, Sergey Uvarov wrote:
JS I've been following the thread about anti-spam measures and I too wanted
JS to create a separate address book for spam addresses
I do not think, that it is good idea. I have very few cases when spam
address is the same. Most of
Dear Jonathan,
Sunday, July 28, 2002, 4:33:08 PM, you wrote:
JA Which is why you create your filters in a particular order like this:
JA 1 - High useage lists
JA 2 - Other lists
JA 3 - Common contacts
JA 4 - Most other contacts
JA 5 - Spam filter
Yes, something like this.
3.) often spam
Dear Art,
Sunday, July 28, 2002, 12:03:01 AM, you wrote:
Only one question: Is spam prohibited by law? :-).
Until not - all measures like filtering by ISP are illegal :-).
Only thing is legal - filtering on receiver side- it is your mail and
you can do with it what you want.
P.S. As i know -
Hello Rick,
On Sun, 28 Jul 2002 08:10:26 -0400 GMT (28/07/02, 19:10 +0700 GMT),
Rick Reumann wrote:
RR For example I think myrealbox.com is down right now
Excerpt from Myrealbox' message dd 19. July to all subscribers:
[...]
We will therefore take the weekend of July 27 and 28 to upgrade our
Hello Miguel,
On Sun, 28 Jul 2002 08:52:53 +0200 GMT (28/07/02, 13:52 +0700 GMT),
Miguel A. Urech wrote:
MAU That is, assign to Ignore Colour Group (light gray), and add the
MAU subject to my Ignore filter, which marks the messages as Read and
MAU Ignored as they come in.
Doesn't that add up
Hello Joyce,
On Sunday, July 28, 2002 at 3:21:34 PM you [JS] wrote (at least in
part):
JS I went into Options/Message List colors Fonts, changed it to 10
JS points... no result.
That's strange, because this's it. This setting is for _message_ list
in preview or folder view mode.
JS I
Hi Sergey,
On Sun, 28 Jul 2002, at 17:05:08 [GMT +0200] (16:05 where I live) you wrote:
SU Dear Art,
SU Sunday, July 28, 2002, 12:03:01 AM, you wrote:
SU Only one question: Is spam prohibited by law? :-).
SU Until not - all measures like filtering by ISP are illegal :-).
Wrong
ANy ISP's
Hello Peter,
Sunday, July 28, 2002, 5:13:14 PM, you wrote:
JS I went into Options/Message List colors Fonts, changed it to 10
JS points... no result.
PP That's strange, because this's it. This setting is for _message_ list
PP in preview or folder view mode.
PP So your first thought
Hello Sergey,
On Sunday, July 28, 2002 at 5:05:08 PM you [SU] wrote (at least in
part):
SU Only one question: Is spam prohibited by law? :-).
Spam in general? In Germany some kind of 'Spam' is prohibited ...
unfortunately not E-Mail-Spam per se.
At least not as 'Spam', only from a commercial
Hello Joyce,
On Sun, 28 Jul 2002 15:21:34 +0200 GMT (28/07/02, 20:21 +0700 GMT),
Joyce Sala wrote:
JS I've tried in vain to reduce the size of the font in the Message List
JS window which seems to be a _huge_ 12 or 14 point size.
JS What am I missing?
Options / Message List Colours and Font
Dear Adam,
Sunday, July 28, 2002, 5:13:14 PM, you wrote:
SU Only one question: Is spam prohibited by law? :-).
SU Until not - all measures like filtering by ISP are illegal :-).
AR Wrong
AR ANy ISP's mail servers (indeed any mail server) is the property of an
AR organisation and
On Sun, 2002-07-28 at 09:41, Sergey Uvarov wrote:
3.) often spam letters have X-Authentication warning in cludges
JA I've never seen this header before in any of the same... how common is
JA if for you? I get nearly 70-160 spam a day.
8-). At my experience this string appears when
Saturday, July 27, 2002, 8:45:44 PM, you wrote:
KLc Yep, that's what I was suggesting he do. Scanning
KLc outbound mail is, to me, redundant, assuming NAV is
KLc doing its job in the first place, and that stupid
KLc splash/banner (which cannot be turned off if the
KLc outbound scanning is on)
Hello Sergey,
Sunday, July 28, 2002, 4:30:02 PM, you wrote:
SU Ideas:
SU TheBat caches contents of AB - so even you change something - it does
SU not mean that you will see changes :-). Maybe restart will helps.
SU Delete and Open all AB: The Bat!, Spamz, and Test (files are not
SU deleted
On Sun, 2002-07-28 at 10:05, Sergey Uvarov wrote:
Only one question: Is spam prohibited by law? :-).
Depends where you are in the world. Many states over in the US
currently have anti-spam laws in place, which a lot of spammers like to
flaunt, and say they comply to them, stating invalid
On Sun, 2002-07-28 at 10:36, Sergey Uvarov wrote:
OK. I know it. But there is one problem. Just imagine - mail office -
Friday - person see a lot of mail to deliver and decide - i am tired -
and he throw all mail to the trashcan :-).
Then he is in the wrong job and should be fired ;)
Dear Jonathan,
Sunday, July 28, 2002, 5:59:09 PM, you wrote:
JA X-Sender isn't the header you're thinking of... I believe you're
JA thinking of X-Mailer aren't you?
Yes. I have made a mistake :-)
JA do agree, that header field needs more careful investigation if you're
JA filtering via it,
Dear Jonathan,
Sunday, July 28, 2002, 5:38:50 PM, you wrote:
JA I know how to show the headers/source ;) I'm just saying... I've never
JA seen it in any of the spam I have got, and I often look at the headers
JA to make modifications on the mail server, to see if I can force a block
JA on
On Sun, 2002-07-28 at 11:14, Sergey Uvarov wrote:
JA I know how to show the headers/source ;) I'm just saying... I've never
JA seen it in any of the spam I have got, and I often look at the headers
JA to make modifications on the mail server, to see if I can force a block
JA on that range,
Hello Sergey,
On Sun, 28 Jul 2002 17:36:03 +0200 GMT (28/07/02, 22:36 +0700 GMT),
Sergey Uvarov wrote:
AR Skipping ads at the beginning of a DVD is a technical issue.
SU But it is spam :-). I bought film, not ads :-).
No, you bought a DVD, containing ads (teasers) and a movie. Without
the
Hello Jonathan,
On 28 Jul 2002 10:38:50 -0500 GMT (28/07/02, 22:38 +0700 GMT),
Jonathan Angliss wrote:
3.) often spam letters have X-Authentication warning in cludges
JA I know how to show the headers/source ;) I'm just saying... I've never
JA seen it in any of the spam I have got,
ACK. It
Hi Sergey,
On Sun, 28 Jul 2002, at 17:36:03 [GMT +0200] (16:36 where I live) you wrote:
SU Dear Adam,
SU Sunday, July 28, 2002, 5:13:14 PM, you wrote:
SU You lose important mail just because person who send it use
SU suspicious e-mail client (or something else, Big Brother is watching
SU
Hello Joyce,
On Sunday, July 28, 2002 at 6:44:34 PM you [JS] wrote (at least in
part):
JS Thank YOU!!! I think I literally *unstuck* the feature! Because
JS *after* doing the 20 point number, suddenly the font agreed to
JS reduce itself to what I wanted.
Have I understood you
Hello Jan,
Sunday, July 28, 2002, 7:59:45 AM, you wrote:
JR Of course not. They should just make it known that they
JR don't approve. Simple as that.
Well I haven't read re-vised TB license, but according to Marck's
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] the license has been
revised.
Quote:
AR (David
Hi Peter.
At 9:29 AM on Sunday, July 28, 2002 you wrote the following
about [Skipping parts not interesting]:
PK [...] It would help greatly if the opposite could be
PK done: To mark interesting treads to follow in future
PK (Watch). This could be done if a flag would apply to
PK any future
Hello Jonathan,
On Sunday, July 28, 2002 at 5:51:07 PM you [JA] wrote (at least in
part):
JA but a system administrator took a certain person to court for
JA wasting his time having to deal with spam instead of his usual
JA work. He won! ;)
Only possible in the US :-) *LoL*
CMIIW but
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Adam,
@28 July 2002, 17:44 +0100 Adam Rykala [AR] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Sergey Uvarov:
AR Then change ISP. You pay for a service - look into what you buy
moderator
This topic has gone way off / too long and I am
On Sunday, July 28, 2002, 10:21:15 AM, Thomas F. wrote:
TF Excerpt from Myrealbox' message dd 19. July to all subscribers:
TF [...]
We will therefore take the weekend of July 27 and 28 to upgrade our servers
with newer and faster hardware.
Please do not expect to be able to login to your
Hello Sergey,
On Sunday, July 28, 2002 at 5:36:03 PM you [SU] wrote (at least in
part):
SU Filtering by X-Sender is a dead way. And who will be loosers in
SU this battle - I know - TB! users :-)
[X-Sender = X-Mailer, already corrected on list]
But that's no discussion point if ISP filtering
Hello Thomas,
On Sunday, July 28, 2002 at 6:27:54 PM you [TF] wrote (at least in
part):
TF I wonder by now whether chinanet or this other ISP in Brasil care...
For sure they don't. Unless these mails come to their mailboxes.
I do reject mails from servers listed in some black lists. The server
Hello Sudip,
SP I find that incredulous ! AFAIK, NAV 2001 configures OE and Eudora
SP automatically but not others, certainly not TB!. Are you sure, your
SP mails were(are) being routed through POPROXY? It's NAV 2002 that scans
SP the default POP and SMTP ports, thereby eliminating the need to
Hello Miguel!
On Sunday, July 28, 2002 at 8:56:27 AM you wrote:
I think it is the duty of every subscriber to read every message
that is being potsted on TBUDL.
This thread for example was one I wasn't interested in from the
subject. So I skipped it until I today saw Miguel's message with
Hello Sudip!
On Sunday, July 28, 2002 at 11:08:42 AM you wrote:
or the cliché Guns don't kill, people do
As Sledgehammer put it: It's not the guns that kill people ... it's
those small round lead bullets ...
--
Dierk Haasis
http://www.Write4U.de
http://Interest.Write4U.de/pongo
PGP keys
Hi Greg.
At 1:06 PM on Sunday, July 28, 2002 you wrote the following
about [As if we didn't have ENOUGH problems with ISPs...]:
JR Of course not. They should just make it known that they
JR don't approve. Simple as that.
GS Well I haven't read re-vised TB license, but according to Marck's
GS
Hello fellow Bat! fans.
I receive sometimes mail like this:-
HTML
BODY BGCOLOR=#AE3A52 leftmargin=0 topmargin=0 marginwidth=0 marginheight=0
link=#E8A6B2
vlink=#FAE6E8 alink=#AE3A51 text=#FF
!--asiansletter_07 --
table width=560 border=0 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=0 align=center
!--Start Top
On Sun, 2002-07-28 at 14:18, John Phillips wrote:
Hello fellow Bat! fans.
I receive sometimes mail like this:-
[snip]
etc. etc. Whole of the post is the same
Is this a Bat! problem (being unable to read the mail) or a sender problem?
Look at the headers, and check to see if it has a:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 28 Jul 2002, at 19:06:55 [GMT +0200], Peter Palmreuther wrote:
PP CMIIW but weren't there a person that won a process because he/she
PP tried to dry the cat in his/her microwave? Because in manual there was
PP not written a cat can't be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 29 Jul 2002, at 05:18:15 [GMT +1000], John Phillips wrote:
JP Hello fellow Bat! fans.
JP I receive sometimes mail like this:-
JP HTML
JP BODY BGCOLOR=#AE3A52 leftmargin=0 topmargin=0 marginwidth=0
marginheight=0 link=#E8A6B2
JP
Hello Jonathan
You wrote On 28 Jul 2002, at 14:29:42 [GMT -0500] (05:29:42 Monday, 29 July 2002
where I live):-
Look at the headers, and check to see if it has a:
Content-Type: text/html
or a:
Content-Type: text/plain
Just has Content-Type:
(blank)
--
Regards,
John Phillips
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Lynn Turriff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it is the duty of every subscriber to read every
message that is being potsted on TBUDL.
No. It is the right of every subscriber, but not the duty. I
read the first and maybe second message of every
On Sunday, July 28, 2002, 4:47:00 PM, Lynn Turriff wrote:
One suspects that it does it so the recipient can see the
'scanned virus free by Norton' note that it puts in the
email, but that's pointless too, since you have to open
the mail to read it.
I have never seen this notice - are you
On Sunday, July 28, 2002, 6:25:09 PM, Rick Reumann wrote:
Yes, I do now remember that message, but shouldn't there be a way
to still not have that beep come up? I was hoping to not have to
uncheck to have that mail checked while they are doing there
service (then I have to
Sunday, July 28, 2002, 6:40:11 PM, you wrote:
KLc Hello Sudip,
SP I find that incredulous ! AFAIK, NAV 2001 configures OE and Eudora
SP automatically but not others, certainly not TB!. Are you sure, your
SP mails were(are) being routed through POPROXY? It's NAV 2002 that scans
SP the default
On Sun, 2002-07-28 at 14:54, John Phillips wrote:
Look at the headers, and check to see if it has a:
Content-Type: text/html
or a:
Content-Type: text/plain
Just has Content-Type:
(blank)
Then that is your problem. The sender didn't set a content-type for TB!
to understand, so
On Sun, 2002-07-28 at 14:52, Michael A. Yetto wrote:
I don't see a head.../head in your example, which would make it an
incomplete HTML file. This might be part of the problem.
Won't make a difference if it was there or not. I don't think you
actually need to include a head section if you
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Peter
Palmreuther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it is the duty of every subscriber to read every
message that is being potsted on TBUDL.
No. Simply No. Period. Nowhere is written I'm in duty to read
every mail coming through this list. And I think
Hello Arjan,
On Sunday, July 28, 2002 at 10:18:03 PM you [AdG] wrote (at least in
part):
AdG Maybe I should apply more of those emoticons (hate them though)
AdG in the future.
Maybe one would have been enough? :-=)
Enough to indicate it's not meant THAT serious as it's written there :-)
Look
Hello tbudl,
Will someone walk me through the meaning of the checkbox called This account is the
default for mailto:; URLs?
To simplify things, I have only two accounts at the moment. I've
tried checking the box for one or the other, both, and none, with no
apparent difference.
Hi Michael,
On Saturday, July 27, 2002 at 12:59:17 PM , Michael scibbled:
A Since I do not use NAV, I am not really sure how it works with TB! or how
A it would work with the filters suggested can someone else maybe
A elaborate for me, and give opinion on whether this would work or not?
MT
Hello Marck,
Saturday, July 27, 2002, 5:38:22 AM, you wrote:
MDP Open the sorting office and click on Incoming mail. Press Ctrl-V to
MDP paste.
Can't do that. Doesn't work.
--
Best regards,
Adam
Current Ver: 1.61
FAQ:
Hello tbudl,
is it not possible to use this feature without the constraint of
double carriage return to start a new phrase then a point, as:
bla bla bla.
bla bla bla...
and not as:
bla bla bla.
Bla bla bla...
In a lot of times it is very bad to view.
--
Best regards,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Adam,
@28 July 2002, 19:33 -0230 (23:03 UK time) Adam [A] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
MDP Open the sorting office and click on Incoming mail. Press Ctrl-V to
MDP paste.
A Can't do that.
Okay - let's try and sort out what
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Pietro,
@28 July 2002, 00:10 +0200 (23:10 UK time) Pietro Migliaccio [PM] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
PM is it not possible to use this feature without the constraint of
PM double carriage return to start a new phrase
On Sun, 2002-07-28 at 16:43, Quin Selman wrote:
Will someone walk me through the meaning of the checkbox called This account is
the
default for mailto:; URLs?
It means that if TheBat is your default mailer, and in your browser you
click on a mail link (done via mailto:email address),
Hi Miguel,
It was Sunday, July 28, 2002, around 3:52:53 AM GMT -0300 when you wrote
the following about Skipping parts not interesting:
Miguel If from the subject I can't tell at first glance, I may read the first
Miguel message or two. If not interested, I Shif+Ctrl+M and mark the messages
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Arjan De Groot [ADG] wrote:
ADG To avoid further misunderstandings: my message was primarily
ADG aimed at TBUDL-subscribers who seem to have problems with the
ADG concept of reading before
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Jonathan Angliss [JA] wrote:
JA Not a setting, but I believe he is using X-Ray... try reading the
JA thread both on here, and TBOT (see footer details).
I personally use my MailServer, MDaemon,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Evandro De Brito Sperandio [EDB] wrote:
EDB BTW, isn't there a feature like ignore thread in The Bat!?
EDB Something like what some newsreaders have (Netscape Messenger,
EDB for example).
No,
On Sun, 2002-07-28 at 18:36, Allie C Martin wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Haha... camel? where did the camel come from? lol... wonder how my mail
server managed to put that one in ;)
JA Not a setting, but I believe he is using X-Ray... try reading the
JA thread
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Jonathan Angliss [JA] wrote:
JA If I was paying any attention, I'd have noticed that in your
JA headers.
With MDaemon, I can adjust just a part of the header, while with
X-Ray, it's an all or
On Sun, 2002-07-28 at 20:17, Allie C Martin wrote:
JA If I was paying any attention, I'd have noticed that in your
JA headers.
With MDaemon, I can adjust just a part of the header, while with
X-Ray, it's an all or none adjustment, so the version number will have
to manually changed with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Jonathan Angliss [JA] wrote:
JA The header I meant was this one:
JA Received: from dellmain by ac-martin.com with SMTP
JA (MDaemon.Standard.v6.0.3.R) for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun,
JA 28 Jul 2002
Hello Allie,
Sunday, July 28, 2002, 6:56:16 PM, you wrote:
ACM No, there isn't one.
Wish there was one.
--
Best regards,
Greg Strong
TB! v1.62/Beta1 on Windows 98
PGP public keys:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=0xB1FE63FABody=Please20send20keys
Hi there, Dierk,
Could you please tell me more on how you use it? I still don't get it.
I have CLIPMATE which can copy anything onto the clipboard, lets me edit
and print or attach.
Thanks,
Julius, Montreal. ]
Saturday, July 27, 2002, 2:40:59 AM, you wrote:
DH Hello Julius!
DH On
Sunday, July 28, 2002, 1:19:24 PM, you wrote:
JBL On Sunday, July 28, 2002, 4:47:00 PM, Lynn Turriff wrote:
One suspects that it does it so the recipient can see the
'scanned virus free by Norton' note that it puts in the
email, but that's pointless too, since you have to open
the mail to
Sunday, July 28, 2002, 2:25:12 PM, you wrote:
JR Sudip is right though - both 2000 and 2001 need manual
JR configuration
JR of The Bat to scan mail. I cannot see how email scanning
JR will occur if
JR this is not done.
KLcAs I said, I *did* tell Nav that I was using an other email
KLc
Hello Marck!
On Monday, July 29, 2002 at 12:08:59 AM you wrote:
snipped for brevity's and clarity's sake
Can anyone tell me - Marck, you, by any chance?! - what this all has
to do with a subjects that clearly indicates I *should not* read this
thread?
I mean, shouldn't this either be made
Hello Julius!
On Monday, July 29, 2002 at 5:42:59 AM you wrote:
Could you please tell me more on how you use it? I still don't get it.
I don't. Most of the time because I have a clipboard extender called
MultipleClipboard, which offers me 10 clipboards - usually enough for
me. After I have
87 matches
Mail list logo
