Hi folks,
Could I ask for a little help please. I just received the email
attached below from my hosting provider. After reading the email I
thought I'd be able to configure The Bat! to suit, but after taking a
look at what I think is the right area I am not so sure!
Could someone who knows
Hi Allister,
on Thu, 28 Nov 2002 21:02:43 +1300GMT (28.11.02, 09:02 +0100GMT here),
you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
AJ Could someone who knows about such things please help me out by
AJ explaining (or giving directions) how TB can address this?
Go to Account properties
Hello Nathan!
On Thursday, November 28, 2002 at 8:03:53 AM you wrote:
I think I've found a minor, but annoying mailto: bug.
This is not actually a bug, simply a malformed value for the protocol
used. There are no blanks allowed in such links unless they are
correctly encoded as %20 (without
Hallo Gerard,
On Thu, 28 Nov 2002 08:42:31 +0100GMT (28-11-02, 8:42 +0100GMT, where
I live), you wrote:
RO Use in your template
RO %comment=green message
RO and use an outgoing filter that triggers on comments: green message
G Is that the comment header in the kludges?
Guilty as charged.
--
Hallo Krister,
On Wed, 27 Nov 2002 16:11:20 +0100GMT (27-11-02, 16:11 +0100GMT, where
I live), you wrote:
KE I'm currently evaluating the pro version of Avg and the bat plug-in,
KE and i'm not sure i've done everything correctly.
If you can see the plug-in in:
Options - Virus protection
you've
ON Thursday, November 28, 2002, 11:01:06 AM, you wrote:
RO Use in your template
RO %comment=green message
RO and use an outgoing filter that triggers on comments: green message
G Is that the comment header in the kludges?
RO Guilty as charged.
That's a good idea, thanks.
--
Best regards,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
'Lo Gerard,
On Thu, 28 Nov 2002 13:19:58 +0100 your time, you said:
G That's a good idea, thanks.
Mind you, if the recipients of your messages have clients that display
comments they might find your 'secret code' it a little puzzling g
- --
ON Thursday, November 28, 2002, 1:35:29 PM, you wrote:
S Mind you, if the recipients of your messages have clients that display
S comments they might find your 'secret code' it a little puzzling g
Simon,
Very few people do that, in fact I think most of them are here on the
list :-)
But
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
'Lo Gerard,
On Thu, 28 Nov 2002 13:39:49 +0100 your time, you said:
G But just to be sure, I will not write Strip me naked and colour me
G green g
I don't know, you might get a few very interesting propositions if you left
that in ;-)
G and
I stumbled on the Gmane-project (http://gmane.org/) while looking for
a post to do with TheBat! Gmane makes it very easy to follow TBUDL as
any other newsgroup. I have only just started doing this, but think
that I will prefer reading TBUDL-messages through Gmane.
Perhaps posting too, later
ON Thursday, November 28, 2002, 2:04:33 PM, you wrote:
G But just to be sure, I will not write Strip me naked and colour me
G green g
S I don't know, you might get a few very interesting propositions if you left
S that in ;-)
Well you should know, being of a slightly orange colour :-)
On Wednesday, November 27, 2002, 7:10 PM, you wrote:
GL Strangely, when I searched for lost folders, TB found 27 -- the backup
GL folders that I created on another drive! So, having found lost folders
GL and deleted the TBI files on the empty ones, I have two copies of
GL most of my mail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, November 28, 2002, Nathan J. Yoder wrote...
I think I've found a minor, but annoying mailto: bug. With an HTML
link that uses the mailto: and a subject line (i.e. a
href=mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=hello how are you) The Bat! may
* Ochrid [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I stumbled on the Gmane-project (http://gmane.org/) while looking for
a post to do with TheBat! Gmane makes it very easy to follow TBUDL as
any other newsgroup. I have only just started doing this, but think
that I will prefer reading TBUDL-messages
Melissa,
Wednesday, November 27, 2002, 8:02:00 PM, you wrote:
MR -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
MR Hash: RIPEMD160
MR On Wednesday, November 27, 2002, at 6:26:09 AM PST, Nick Dutton wrote:
Is there any way that I can edit a received message? I use many of
my TB folders for reference and
Hallo Ochrid,
On Thu, 28 Nov 2002 14:18:28 +0100GMT (28-11-02, 14:18 +0100GMT, where
I live), you wrote:
O The decision not to be an ordinary open news group was no doubt
O made after ample consideration and for very good reasons, but I
O would be interested to hear other the opinion of other
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, November 28, 2002, Carsten Thönges wrote...
I stumbled on the Gmane-project (http://gmane.org/)
Gmane is great! This mail comes to you via Gmane. (Sorry for this
test, hm, is everything okay with this mail?)
I guess somebody
On Thu, 28 Nov 2002 17:54:51 +0100, Roelof Otten wrote:
But the worst thing of all is clearly that somebody thought it a good
idea to gate a mailing list to news without telling the list members
that he was compromising their e-mail address.
Indeed. I wondered if TBUDL-people (i.e Marck) had
Good evening Roelof,
It was foretold that on 28-11-2002 @ 11:15:53 GMT+0100 (which was
11:15:53 where I live) Roelof Otten would mumble:
snipped a bit
RO When I test my AV-settings, I send a message to
RO [EMAIL PROTECTED] with in the message body:
Something new i learned today :-)
RO What
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, November 28, 2002, Roelof Otten wrote...
O The decision not to be an ordinary open news group was no doubt
O made after ample consideration and for very good reasons, but I
O would be interested to hear other the opinion of other
Hello Roelof,
On Thu, 28 Nov 2002, at 17:54:51 GMT +0100 (11/28/2002, 10:54 AM -0500
GMT here), you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
RO But the worst thing of all is clearly that somebody thought it a
RO good idea to gate a mailing list to news without telling the list
RO
27 November 2002, 23:14, you wrote:
MDP Start a new message and write the whole thing in one go. Then,
MDP instead of sending it, copy the message body to the clipboard, open
MDP the mass mail quick template and paste the text in. Cancel the
MDP message and you should then be all set. That's the
Hi Richard,
On Thu, 28 Nov 2002, at 19:45:19 [GMT +] you wrote:
RE Hi TBUDL,
RE On Tue, 12 Nov 2002, at 14:19:14 [GMT +0100] you wrote:
LG Hi Gerard,
LG On Tuesday, November 12, 2002 at 13:53:27 [GMT +0100], you wrote:
G Currently I have to use the Alternative Forward method to get the
G
Hello Nick,
MR What I then do is this:
MR 1) I place a ! at the beginning of each memo, then...
Melissa, nice bit of lateral thinking!
Yes, it certainly is. Thanks Melissa :-)
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.61
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Clive,
@28-Nov-2002, 19:25 Clive Taylor [CT] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
CT Incidentally, there seems to have been in glitch in the TBUDL
CT server. Hardly any messages for two days then a rush this
CT evening.
Yes - for
Thursday, November 28, 2002, 9:37:47 AM, you wrote:
JA I think that is correct behavior per RFCs. Special characters such as
JA spaces, , and such are supposed to converted to the hex version.
...
JA So TB! is only behaving as per the rules. You'll find it is the other
JA mail clients that are
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, November 28, 2002, Nathan J. Yoder wrote...
JA I think that is correct behavior per RFCs. Special characters
JA such as spaces, , and such are supposed to converted to the hex
JA version.
...
JA So TB! is only behaving as per the rules.
Hello Jonathan,
Thu, 28 Nov 2002 at 23:18:10[GMT -0600](05:18 where I live) you wrote
in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
Start changing things, or flexing the rules slightly, and you end up
having all kinds of problems.
Unless you're Microsnort in which case you can design a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, November 28, 2002, Richard Wakeford wrote...
Start changing things, or flexing the rules slightly, and you end
up having all kinds of problems.
Unless you're Microsnort in which case you can design a browser that
doesn't conform to
It's long, I know, I'm sorry :(
Friday, November 29, 2002, 12:18:10 AM, you wrote:
JA It's almost this kind of thinking (no offence) that starts getting
JA programs in trouble. I know mailto: URLs won't cause any halm (unless
JA you do permit certain headers to be set), but saying well, just let
30 matches
Mail list logo
