Tuesday, January 04, 2000, 2:46:25 AM, NamNH wrote:
I want to have auto reply for vacation.
No, you don't. :P
Anyone know a service that allow me to send auto message
during days off ?
Yes, just don't do it. People who are on mailing lists that you're on and
forget to set to
Tuesday, January 04, 2000, 11:10:28 AM, Marck wrote:
He spammed us and, for that sin, is condemned to read our ramblings
until he rescinds his address.
Oooo, bad, bd idea. Personally, if I were ever on the end of that I'd
just setup a filter, strip out all headers, recreate random
Tuesday, January 04, 2000, 3:01:46 PM, Nick wrote:
I don't think it's a stupid question at all... I myself was wondering
the same thing, but just haven't had the time to ask it. Sorry I can't
give you an answer, rather just wanted you to know that the stupid
question is one that is never
Tuesday, January 04, 2000, 4:28:48 PM, Nick wrote:
TB. IMHO, Outlook 2K is a super Program in it's own way... one of the
best I've ever seen, but it has to suit the user, right?
The fact that it isn't an email client kinda kills it right there. :P
--
Steve C. Lamb |
Tuesday, January 04, 2000, 4:32:38 PM, Nick wrote:
I knew I could do that... I was only trying to save myself all those
mouse clicks. With Outlook, you can delete an entire thread with only
one click. :o) Sorry, couldn't hold that one back. Ha ha ha!!
With Outlook you can also have the
Tuesday, January 04, 2000, 4:53:17 PM, Nick wrote:
Don't think though that TB is immune to those kinds of things... wasn't so
long ago, that people thought that way of spreading viruses was impossible.
Nick. In the simplest, easiest terms, let me explain this. TB! is immune
to those
Tuesday, January 04, 2000, 5:00:13 PM, Nick wrote:
Technically, Outlook is a PIM, but to say it's not an E-Mail Client is
not quite true. What exactly do you mean by that?
Just that, it isn't an email client. As you said, it is a PIM. It does a
lot of things, all of them poorly.
Tuesday, January 04, 2000, 5:53:01 PM, Nick wrote:
What I meant to imply, was that one day TB might itself be subject to
some kind of heinous virus... never say never, right!! As to rest of
your post, you can shove it Steve!!
I'm going to repeat this slowly this time. Read it slowly and
Tuesday, January 04, 2000, 8:22:45 PM, Thomas wrote:
Steve, who's side are you on? ;-)
The good side. Just pointing out what an inventive person can do with
that ready supply of unwanted ammunition. ;)
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
Tuesday, December 28, 1999, 11:55:15 AM, Chuck wrote:
JT deltree /y c:\windows\temp nul
JT md c:\windows\temp
Better way is
deltree /y c:\windows\temp\*.*nul
If any of you are using NT the following batch file will delete all
temp files and directories in temp:
@echo off
pushd %1
del
Tuesday, December 28, 1999, 5:16:29 PM, tracer wrote:
I use a little program called ZAP to do it as it allows many more
things one can do at the same time like cleaning all files of certain
extensions etc etc.
You mean like...
rm *.(bat|sys|com)
:)
--
Steve C. Lamb
Sunday, December 26, 1999, 11:48:42 PM, Syafril wrote:
From the fact above, you can see
You forgot #4.
#4: Since HD speeds are measured in ms and RAM in ns HDs are a magnitude
slower than RAM. Therefore hitting swap is *bad*. With RAM hovering around
$1.25/Meg it is better to get more
Monday, December 27, 1999, 4:38:35 AM, Ali wrote:
stable than before and this is most likely because the machines today
come with at least 32MB of memory. In fact 64MB seems to be the
standard. On top of that win98 is inherently more stable than it's
predecessors.
Ever wonder why the
Monday, December 27, 1999, 8:45:59 AM, Syafril wrote:
Question : Mail Client is Compute Bound or I/O bound from your point
of view ?
Neither. Mind you I ran a Fido BBS when I was 16 on a 386sx-16, 2Mb RAM
and a 40MBb IDE drive. Nothing like tossing a few thousand messages a day
from
Monday, December 27, 1999, 9:56:45 AM, tracer wrote:
Same with having that silly onboard video using system ram.
Funny thing is take a look at what AGP boards use for their frame buffer.
;)
In my own case the main reason I had a lot of ram was internet, to
make use of the lousy and
Monday, December 27, 1999, 12:40:59 PM, Rob wrote:
*We* do not feel the need to celebrate or believe in anything,
not even the coming of Spring ?! ;-) i can't wait ...
Feh, I'm in SoCal where on a bad day it still gets up to 70 degrees.
Worst part is everyone around me doesn't see
On Sat, Dec 25, 1999 at 09:06:33PM +0300, Andrew K. Lovetski wrote:
I have a question: is this a part of Netiqette? Are there any reasons
for disabling this (wonderful, IMVHO :) feature except for that you
don't like it (I don't know why?!)?
Because TB! is the only client that I know
Saturday, December 25, 1999, 3:17:58 PM, Frank wrote:
So RFC 822 makes no restrictions on the lengths of text lines in the *body*
of an E-mail message. RFC 822 *does* make restrictions on the length of
lines in E-mail *headers*, but that is not the issue we're discussing.
Gah, wrap your
Saturday, December 25, 1999, 3:49:26 PM, Frank wrote:
Wrapping lines is *one* convention and not the only one. I used to do that, but I
found that many messages got messed up when people copied and pasted my words.
Really, for almost 20 years I did
what you describe. I've come around to
Saturday, December 25, 1999, 4:39:56 PM, Mark wrote:
in the spirit of your Christian/Pagan/Moslem celebrations I will go
away and dance around the nearest tree:-)
T'hell with that.
GIMMEGIMMEGIMMEGIMMEGIMMEGIMMEGIMMEGIMMEGIMMEGIMMEGIMME
*Cough* :)
--
Saturday, December 25, 1999, 5:41:15 PM, Frank wrote:
FYI, here's what long lines look line when you respond to them in another
mailer.
Yup, wrong. When quoting it should not automatically rewrap.
It's really the *display* issue in The Bat. No one is forced to re-wrap ...
only users of
CJT I'd like to wish you all, a very merry Christmas and a happy New
CJT Year 2000 -- the last year in this century. :-)
Wow... Someone got it right.
-- Steve, still dismayed at the array of people who are calling this new year
the end of the millennium and the end of the century when
Slashdot article:
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=99/12/24/0111239mode=thread
Don't know how many Linux people we have on these lists but I think it is
something for both BWS and Ritlabs to follow closely. Opera, to me,
represents the first time that a smaller ISV has ported their
Hello The Bat! developers,
There are some features I would like to see in your program:
There is a global purge and delete. Would be nice to have a global purge
duplicates as well for those of us (ahem) who have to merge an older message
base with a newer one.
Regards,
Steve Lamb
Wednesday, December 22, 1999, 4:49:47 AM, tracer wrote:
He said he took all of one hour to try and use the bat...
That doesn't describe how long he took looking for any particular item
before giving up. Personally nearly everything on his list I found and
configured to my liking (or at
Wednesday, December 22, 1999, 7:40:25 AM, Oliver wrote:
When using variable-width fonts in The Bat! becomes possible, half the
messages on this list will be unreadable, IMHO.
The other half, of course, will be coming from me. As we all know, they
are practically unreadable as it is. At
Wednesday, December 22, 1999, 8:12:54 AM, Thomas wrote:
The serial number of your email client is? What about your email
address? Should that be suppressed too? ;-)
Ah, but we can have multiple accounts on TB!. Just because my personal
account is [EMAIL PROTECTED], and I don't mind people
Wednesday, December 22, 1999, 9:15:27 AM, Thomas wrote:
I did visit www.m-w.com for "echelon", but still don't get your
meaning. You want to go left and right of the other guys? Or of
yourself? -- ?
From another message I sent out on another list, pardon the tone, it was
in a heated and
Wednesday, December 22, 1999, 1:22:46 PM, Ali wrote:
Would you be so kind as to expand on your knowledge on this?
He uses an outgoing filter to call an external script which modifies the
headers.
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
Tuesday, December 21, 1999, 10:43:47 PM, Thomas wrote:
Two possiblities:
1.) On an account level: Account/Properties.../Templates/New Message.
2.) On a folder level: Folder/Properties/Template.
Three. Recipient level at Addressbook / Recipient / Properties.
FF How do I turn off the
Tuesday, December 21, 1999, 10:20:10 PM, Frank wrote:
-MM-DD HH:MM:SS
Why don't they appear that way in the received/created columns?
Because TB! doesn't use the Windows settings.
For today's messages, why don't they have today's date?
Because it is a given that if a
Monday, December 20, 1999, 2:59:17 AM, Thomas wrote:
If you have a programme that will partition my hard disk without
reformat, please let me know. I would even make an extra partition for
Linux. :-)
Partition Magic.
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink,
roles
people can have accounts for (postmaster, for example).
Regards,
Steve Lamb
--
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Tuesday, December 14, 1999, 3:19:28 PM, Leif wrote:
soapbox
Because the subscriber base of TBUDL and TBBETA is so diverse
demographically, I made it a rule when I started these two UDLs that
profanity is not allowed.
[snippage]
/soapbox
soapbox
There is no such thing as profane
Wednesday, December 15, 1999, 9:43:34 AM, Nick wrote:
Oooh, word games!!! He has sh*t for brains!
Can I take the trip to Cancun??
Sure. Nick wins a no express trip to Cancun! He'll enjoy whatever class
of flight he books for himself and accommodations in whatever hotel he
decides to
Tuesday, December 14, 1999, 2:46:22 AM, Oleg wrote:
C assignable finctions to all (FIVE!!!). I have assigned DEL to one of
C them. What a breeze. Hardly touch the keyboard any longer.
This tendency will end up with a keyboard on a ball.
Might as well get one of those keyboards with a
Saturday, December 11, 1999, 12:54:50 PM, Paula wrote:
But, are any of these Linux users willing to pay for an application?
There are three types of Linux users. Which group are you referring to?
Group 1: Die hard free (speech) and free (beer) software advocates.
Most likely not.
Wednesday, December 08, 1999, 7:34:51 PM, Leif wrote:
Stay tuned.. We are working out the EM questionnaire and rating scale
(to determine the severity of your case) as well as the EM creed.
I already know I am an emailaholic. My signs...
1: Other people can't operate before their morning
Thursday, December 09, 1999, 2:17:16 PM, Alexander wrote:
Sometimes.:-)) Hey, Steve, are you still here?
No.
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
ICQ: 5107343 | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
Sunday, December 05, 1999, 8:30:44 PM, tracer wrote:
Steve Yes, filtering calling an external scripting language. :)
Steve, I know we may end up breeding another horse (g) but could you
please indicate in some more detail what you use and whats proven to
work??
With maybe an example??
Saturday, December 04, 1999, 9:13:20 PM, Jason wrote:
One thing I'd specifically like to know is, will TB ever support any
kind of simple scripting?
It already does.
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
ICQ: 5107343 | main
Here is my reply that bounced. You'll see why...
- Snip -
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 1999 07:20:07 -0800
From: Steve Lamb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.36) S/N 3290604 / Personal
Reply-To: Steve Lamb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organization: Earthlink Network
Wednesday, December 01, 1999, 9:01:56 AM, Martin wrote:
I read somewhere you could put '--' in front of your signature so
that if ppl would reply to your mail, the signature would not be
included in the message.
'-- ' Note the space.
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your
Wednesday, December 01, 1999, 10:13:26 AM, Michal wrote:
AFAIK, there should NOT be any space characters after "--"
Nope. Technically speaking the sig delimiter is define as "dash dash
space newline" or "-- \n" in C/Perl notation.
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm
Wednesday, December 01, 1999, 10:09:22 PM, Paula wrote:
Here's a little tutorial on regular expressions that a fellow did for
Gravity users, if anyone is interested.
http://www.naplesfl.net/~tbates/gravity/reg-100.html
Just wanted to point out that it is good for the general concepts but
Tuesday, November 30, 1999, 11:53:58 AM, Martin wrote:
1) Is it possible in The Bat! to use multiple line cookies?
Yes, \n in the cookie will split the line.
2) Is it possible to set a different language (for the spell
checker) for each address or folder?
Not at present.
--
Tuesday, November 30, 1999, 12:21:06 PM, Rob wrote:
yep !! on account level and/or folder level in the message templates ...
Please be careful on what you say...
using The Bat! 1.38 Beta/4 (reg)
As you're not using the latest release things are subject to change and a
lot of people
Tuesday, November 30, 1999, 1:24:43 PM, Ali wrote:
Whenever you wish to send a recipient this special message then, in
the editor window, you may insert the template at any point in your
message by going to Utilities | Insert quick template | (then choose
the appropriate template).
Or
Tuesday, November 30, 1999, 3:25:55 PM, Jast wrote:
Looking around a little: Mulberry, a client that supports
exclusively IMAP and is supposed to be good at it. (Windows/Mac,
Shareware, ca. $40)
OK, after playing for a few minutes with it here are my thoughts.
Strikes against:
o
Friday, November 26, 1999, 7:56:58 PM, Andreas wrote:
Problem is, that all the attachments I have ever received are related to the old
attachment path D:\Dfue\The Bat!\Attaches. This path information is stored
in the mails. How can I change them to the new directory??
Just as aside, but
Tuesday, November 23, 1999, 7:25:10 PM, Thomas wrote:
I'd like to try "idiot mode". However, before I do that, kindly let me
know how to disable "idiot mode" again. ;-)
Come now, figuring out how to exit it is the test to prove you're worthy
of disabling it in the first place. ;)
--
Wednesday, November 24, 1999, 3:19:43 PM, Ali wrote:
chuckle Those hilarious responses to Thomas, Paula and now this???
Hey, just because I'm a self-proclaimed curmudgeon doesn't mean I don't
have a sense of humor. :P
I dislike autocompletion. My experience with it has been uniformly
Wednesday, November 24, 1999, 5:11:44 PM, Alexander wrote:
BTW, what does this "curmudgeon" mean after all?:-)) I'm
afraid it's not in my PC-based dictionary, and being as lazy as
you I don't want to search for it on the bookshelves:-))
From http://www.m-w.com.
Main Entry: cur·mud·geon
Monday, November 22, 1999, 6:47:19 PM, Thomas wrote:
OK, so by default the cursor should always go into the header, even if
there is data (TO/Subject/...) already. Unless there is a %SkipHeader
macro. This defines the default as opposite to what I was thinking of,
but I get your point.
Monday, November 22, 1999, 7:26:01 PM, Paula wrote:
I would say that if the user has put a %SkipHeader macro in the
template, then TB shouldn't worry about whether or not there is anything
entered in the header, unless the intent is to allow the %SkipHeader
only if the TO is filled in. I
Tuesday, November 23, 1999, 11:46:02 AM, Mogens wrote:
My ISP's supreme tech supporter finally suggested to download Becky
(buh!) and surprise, surprise - no problems.
Any ideas?
Reenter the name of the SMTP server.
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink,
Tuesday, November 23, 1999, 1:59:47 PM, Mogens wrote:
The smptserver is spelled correctly, and I actually copied/pasted it to
Becky from The Bat!
Did you completely delete it? I mean total paranoia delete where you try
to delete spaces and stuff of that ilk.
Also check your TB!
Tuesday, November 23, 1999, 2:03:17 PM, Jast wrote:
I prefer template macros. They are more versatile (in regard to
usability - you never know what functionality you could add to a
macro) and don't take up window space if you don't use it. Really, I
don't like long option lists. Of
Tuesday, November 23, 1999, 2:59:46 PM, Ali wrote:
it is more difficult than it should be, and one can't really do
anything about bad formatting in that situation.
Sure. Bitch to the person who sent it.
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
And the three letters were... ali.
Since TB! has autocompletion based on name it is, IMHO, very dangerously
and very incorrectly introducing false and misleading data into its own
database. Clearly Ali Martin's address is not [EMAIL PROTECTED] yet
that is what my TB! completes to.
--
Monday, November 22, 1999, 10:55:00 AM, Deryk wrote:
Additionally, "control -" will collapse a single thread.
Any idea what will collapse all threads? It wasn't the obvious
"control /" :-)
There isn't one listed in the keyboard shortcuts that Ali sent out
recently.
--
Steve C.
Sunday, November 21, 1999, 4:07:05 AM, Ali wrote:
This is why MS became successful enough to wield monopoly power, i.e., nice
advertising and making their customers feel good, giving them what they want
instead of telling them what they need. I know that this is not a good thing
but I'm just
Sunday, November 21, 1999, 5:17:37 AM, Ali wrote:
There is an optimal balance that can be attained Steve and I don't
think it's as difficult as you make it out to be.
Of course not, I've attained it. I'm waiting for everyone else to figure
that out.
--
Steve C. Lamb |
Friday, November 19, 1999, 5:40:07 PM, Thomas wrote:
Hi Alexander,
on Tuesday, November 23, 1999, 9:23:01 AM GMT+0800, Alexander V. Kiselev wrote:
[...]
Your machine is three days fast and I can never find your messages
until after someone has replied already and I go looking. Kindly
Saturday, November 20, 1999, 7:08:41 AM, Alexander wrote:
Nope, PMMail will work with English only (well, actually I don't
know, but it *definitely* won't work with Russian, it's got
defective code that won't accept anything then western unicode
script correctly, and for Russian one needs
Saturday, November 20, 1999, 7:10:34 AM, Alexander wrote:
Hi there!
On 20 Nov 99, at 3:20, Steve Lamb wrote
about "Re: (No Subject)":
3:20am...
String: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Location: kludges Present: yes
Any wonde
Saturday, November 20, 1999, 3:11:27 PM, Ali wrote:
explanation of the findings and the implications etc. They expect it
then and there. See what I'm getting at? I have to do that, explaining
the same things, day in and day out.
I certainly do. In my 3 years of tech support at a small
Saturday, November 20, 1999, 3:37:50 PM, Deryk wrote:
I thought there were 3, but the PGP put an extra one in :) In other
words, I'm doing that already.
Thanks for the tip though, it seems to be yet another interesting
feature that's either undocumented or else well hidden G
PGP escapes
Tuesday, November 16, 1999, 10:34:26 PM, tracer wrote:
Steve If that is it, run Linux and Samba. Better use of the hardware.
But not everybody knows how to connect linux and windows together over
a network
Samba. Just like connecting Windows to Windows over a network. :P
--
Wednesday, November 17, 1999, 6:39:29 AM, Roel wrote:
SL Samba. Just like connecting Windows to Windows over a network. :P
Seems like hell :-)
Better than trying to find a free NFS for Windows.
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
Monday, November 15, 1999, 9:02:56 AM, Ali wrote:
In The Bat!, open the account properties, and select File and
Directories. There you'll see the home directory to which I'm
referring.
Funny, why do you think I said TB! should use relative paths, not
absolute. I forced it to be relative
Monday, November 15, 1999, 12:23:46 PM, Jast wrote:
A reason to keep the message you got it with... in which case you
only have to select it and the key gets inserted automatically and
you only have to enter the password
How am I going to access that message on the new machine? :)
Monday, November 15, 1999, 2:03:57 PM, Roel wrote:
Well, it does have advantages over the ini-concept (no 64k-limit,
additional data-types,...)
SL Those limits are arbitrary.
not if you use the microsoft-routines for accessing ini-files... (if
you use just a write/read then it's limited
Monday, November 15, 1999, 2:28:53 PM, Roel wrote:
well, it's not a real bug, as the ini-file-specification sets size
limits to 64k... (remember that these were developped for win 3.x and
maybe even lower...)
so they just obey the limit that MS has set for ini-files... :-)
File-specs can
Sunday, November 14, 1999, 3:08:42 AM, Ali wrote:
He needs to export the registry key for The Bat! and import it in his
new machines registry. In order for the registry keys to function
properly, he should also make sure that he copies The Bat! directory
to a drive of the same name as on the
Tuesday, November 09, 1999, 8:04:19 AM, Soth wrote:
My friend, posting the same 14k email in response to 3 _unrelated_
topics is very inconsiderate. Not everybody can afford that kind of
rudeness.
I have a suspicion that it is because he somehow got a filter setup and
doesn't know what
Tuesday, November 09, 1999, 8:32:35 AM, Soth wrote:
You could be right, in which case I apologize for a too-hasty judgement.
I don't know Eudora's filters, so I don't know what kind of mistake
would lead up to the type of spam that he's spewing.
They're just like any semi-advanced
Tuesday, November 09, 1999, 8:39:19 AM, Roel wrote:
don't know about that: if you look at the times the mails were
created: he generated about 3/minute...
if it had been a filter they would all have had the same
creation-time... (unless he's running a 286 at 6 Mhz :-) )
If you look at
Monday, November 01, 1999, 11:28:35 AM, Ali wrote:
Many OSS programmers chimed in at that point to say that they get paid to
develop OSS. That's the funding I'm speaking about. If this type of funding
doesn't in anyway apply to GNOME and KDE development, then I stand
corrected.
The
Wednesday, November 03, 1999, 9:06:50 AM, Kevin wrote:
They chose to use it, didn't they?
I honestly don't know very many people who have a choice of what OS they
use in their jobs.
I honestly don't know of very many IT managers that don't have a choice.
It is still a (l)user's
Wednesday, November 03, 1999, 9:33:41 AM, Kevin wrote:
OK, so 99.9% of the people don't have a choice.
Isn't that a little high given the amount of home PCs and number of
businesses that do allow users to chose?
And yes it does become a problem FOR them. But I think the point was that it
Wednesday, November 03, 1999, 12:11:59 PM, Kevin wrote:
Actually, it would be better to have a variety. Makes viruses kind of
hard to propagate, doesn't it?
Probably, but I wouldn't make my choice of OS at home based on that. :-)
No, but it is about as valid a reason as any other.
Wednesday, November 03, 1999, 3:52:51 PM, Kevin wrote:
No, not as valid a reason as "I don't want to work in two different
word processors, I want to be able to transfer stuff from work to
home", etc. So it's not as valid a reason as any others.
Those are no more valid at all when you
Saturday, October 30, 1999, 9:35:22 PM, Thomas wrote:
A niche market is still a market, but I agree with you in principle.
A niche market, when the target isn't the lowest common denominator, does
not much resemble the "bad" influences the general market exudes on products.
I'm thinking
Sunday, October 31, 1999, 9:55:31 AM, Paula wrote:
[Mucho snippage]
All these examples are from real life. Want more? I could fill a volume.
How are any of these problems the result of the ineptitude of the users?
Yet for each of those stories there are thousands, literally thousands
where
Sunday, October 31, 1999, 10:09:38 AM, Paula wrote:
a computer with a problem, which wants to waste my time trying to
interpret its pouting silence or irritatingly cryptic outbursts. Rather
like men.
Rather like women, actually. Most of the men I know will state flat out
what the problem
Monday, November 01, 1999, 11:38:33 AM, Ali wrote:
Hi all,
On Monday, November 01, 1999, 1:45:35 PM (-5 GMT), Steve scribbled:
All these examples are from real life. Want more? I could fill a
volume. How are any of these problems the result of the ineptitude
of the users?
Yet for
Friday, October 29, 1999, 1:37:24 AM, Thomas wrote:
They have to breath, wehtehr they want to or not. They don't have to
use comptuers - "we" want them to. For commercial, political, or other
reasons. The bone won't walk to the dog. (German saying, meaning if
you want to sell something, you
Friday, October 29, 1999, 3:15:03 AM, Lionel wrote:
Except some users can't do it: Forbidden by the agreement between the
ISP and them. It's my case : Cable user in France, forbidden to put up
any sort of a server, FTP, HTTP nor anything other. If I want to put
an FTP server on my cable
Friday, October 29, 1999, 3:15:03 AM, Lionel wrote:
Except some users can't do it: Forbidden by the agreement between the
ISP and them. It's my case : Cable user in France, forbidden to put up
any sort of a server, FTP, HTTP nor anything other. If I want to put
an FTP server on my cable
Wednesday, October 27, 1999, 7:30:11 PM, Thomas wrote:
Why? Even if this was meant to offend computers (which it wasn't), why
do you take it personally?
Because it is an attack on those who don't find computers in that manner.
SL difficult to use,
I disagree - they are, for the general
Tuesday, October 26, 1999, 11:27:03 PM, Oleg wrote:
I think it is because it will be not easy to make use of forwarded
information when recipient of the forwarded message will want to
reply, and especially to forward the message.
The signature should go after the forwarded
Wednesday, October 27, 1999, 3:15:07 PM, Ralf wrote:
I open a new message, write a few lines and then try to attach a ZIP
file of about 9 megabytes to that message. After some lengthy hard disk
activity (at least 30 seconds) a message box saying "Out of memory!"
comes up and the file is not
Wednesday, October 27, 1999, 5:25:16 PM, Paula wrote:
Computers will become a more and more integral part of our lives, but
they will look and behave nothing like these primitive, difficult to
use, unreliable, frustrating tools we use now - and it won't be that
long - but in the meantime,
Tuesday, October 26, 1999, 3:03:15 AM, Patrick wrote:
where did you get /this/ version from? i waited for a year for a new
version of PMmail but eventualy bought the bat last week... mh...
PMMail2000 was released Oct. 15th after PMMail98 and PMMail/2 were sold
from Southsoft to BSW.
--
Tuesday, October 26, 1999, 9:39:49 AM, Ali wrote:
The Bat! certainly dwarfs it in overall functionality.
True. But PMMail's interface and the functionality it does have is quite
polished.
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
ICQ: 5107343
Tuesday, October 26, 1999, 10:43:12 AM, Oliver wrote:
multi-byte charset, there's enough space in there to use some magic
sequence as a mark.
What would it do, then, when it sends the message out? :P
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
Sunday, October 24, 1999, 10:42:51 PM, Thomas wrote:
RM + A new checkbox inside a Adress Entry Property:
RM "Always encrypt outgoing E-mail to this user" (PGP)
Agree.
While I agree with this you are aware this is possible with templates,
right?
RM + A new checkbox inside a Adress Entry
Monday, October 25, 1999, 9:56:51 AM, Mail wrote:
We are sorry to inform you that your e-mail ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
has been banned. This means that everytime you try to send
us e-mail - you will get this reply AUTOMATICLY!
Ooo, ooo, ban me too, ban me too! M!! BAN ME!!!
--
Monday, October 25, 1999, 1:43:44 PM, Paula wrote:
Yes, of course, but I think that those with just a few questions,
probably don't hang around long. Who knows? My point was only that
postings to a user list are perhaps not the best guide of the wishes of
the entire userbase, much less the
601 - 700 of 756 matches
Mail list logo
