Re: [Query] SpamPal (or Alternatives) and The Bat

2004-10-18 Thread Allie Martin
On 18/10/2004 at 1:39:52 AM, David M. Dickerson, [DMD] wrote: > One person has suggested that NAV works automatically and unseen > with TB!, which is why there is no plug-in. This comment deserves a response here. Most anti-virus programs come with incoming/outgoing message monitoring, of which

Re: [Query] SpamPal (or Alternatives) and The Bat

2004-10-17 Thread David M. Dickerson
Hello, Alexander! On Sunday, 17 October 2004, Alexander S. Kunz wrote: ASK> If you have to look at what you're spending your ASK> money for, IMO, you're better off with a good ASK> standalone virus scanner (I recommend Kaspersky) ASK> and leave all the (IMO crappy, sorry) Norton stuff ASK> be T

Re: [Query] SpamPal (or Alternatives) and The Bat

2004-10-17 Thread David M. Dickerson
Hello, Mike! On Saturday, 6 October 16 2004, Mike Rourke wrote: MR> I used SpamPal for awhile. It can be big and slow. MR> K9 is much faster and about 99% accurate Thank you for your input, Mike. Ironically, someone else sent me a private message highly recommending SpamPal for use with The Bat

Re[2]: [Query] SpamPal (or Alternatives) and The Bat!

2004-10-17 Thread Code 2
DMD>> I have noticed that some members of TBUDL are using SpamPal DMD>> (http://www.spampal.org/) with The Bat!. MR> I used SpamPal for awhile. It can be big and slow. K9 is much faster and about 99% accurate. MR> I had bad experiences with the BayesIt plug-in for TB. I got MR> over my fears and

Re: [Query] SpamPal (or Alternatives) and The Bat!

2004-10-17 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello David M. Dickerson & everyone else 17-Okt-2004 02:27, you wrote: > I am about to reinstall Windows XP Professional and will be installing > Norton SystemWorks Premium 2005, which comes with Norton AntiVirus 2005, > so I do not need another anti-virus program, nor can I afford the > expense.

Re: [Query] SpamPal (or Alternatives) and The Bat!

2004-10-16 Thread Mike Rourke
Hi David, DMD> I have noticed that some members of TBUDL are using SpamPal DMD> (http://www.spampal.org/) with The Bat!. I used SpamPal for awhile. It can be big and slow. K9 is much faster and about 99% accurate. I had bad experiences with the BayesIt plug-in for TB. I got over my fears and

Re: [Query] SpamPal (or Alternatives) and The Bat!

2004-10-16 Thread Roman Katzer
Hi David, On Saturday, October 16, 2004, 20:27:12, David M. Dickerson wrote: > [anti-spam software] I use K9 (http://keir.net/k9.html), extremely small, very very fast and good configuration options. Accuracy about 98-99% here. Roman Current v

[Query] SpamPal (or Alternatives) and The Bat!

2004-10-16 Thread David M. Dickerson
Hello, everyone! I have noticed that some members of TBUDL are using SpamPal (http://www.spampal.org/) with The Bat!. Because SpamPal is probably only tangentially related to the main topics of TBUDL, I would like to ask anyone using SpamPal if they are satisfied with the results and if you had/hav