On Saturday, February 22, 2003, James Olsen wrote:
There's also free Win32 version that you can very easily use with
ANY email client called SAProxy (http://saproxy.bloomba.com/). It
will scan messages and flag them as SPAM (based on your
configuration) as they are downloaded from your
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Tim Fountain [TF] wrote:'
TF On a semi-related note, does anyone know if it's possible to setup a
TF global filter of some sort that applies to all accounts?
No. This isn't possible. It will likely be possible in later
~John,
On 22-02-2003 01:25, you [~] wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
~ Peter Fjelsten wrote:
M But that is also because Spampal has the option to bounce (actually
M a reply) spam messages which, to my knowledge, is completely wrong in
M concept. If bounce (or reply to) real spam it will get
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Hi Miguel,
In a message with mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 21 Feb 2003 21:37:09 , you typed:
Have you guys used SpamPal ?
MAU Yes, for a couple of days and decided to stay with POPFile.
May i ask why? Is Spampal harder to set up? Less ackurate?
Krister Ekstrom wrote:
MAU Yes, for a couple of days and decided to stay with POPFile.
I never could figure out how to setup Popfile.
--
Regards,
John Morse
Pride is what we have, vanity is what others have
Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL
Hello Krister,
May i ask why? Is Spampal harder to set up? Less ackurate? I also want
to use the best, so am curious as to why folks prefer one thing over
the other, but it's also of course a matter of preference.
I'm only interested in Bayesian classification and that is only one of
the
Hello John,
I never could figure out how to setup Popfile.
Once installed the Manual is available:
,- [ ]
| To learn how to set up POPFile, please choose one of the following options.
|
| Installing POPFile
| Setting up Buckets for mail classification
| Getting your email program to
Miguel A. Urech wrote:
M | Installing POPFile
M | Setting up Buckets for mail classification
M | Getting your email program to work with POPFile
M | Training POPFile
I looked over the manual, but it was way to vague for me.
Especially when all I ever seen from the program was a DOS program.
On Saturday, February 22, 2003, 22:11, John Morse wrote:
M | Installing POPFile
M | Setting up Buckets for mail classification
M | Getting your email program to work with POPFile
M | Training POPFile
I looked over the manual, but it was way to vague for me.
Especially when all I ever seen
Hello John,
I looked over the manual, but it was way to vague for me.
Especially when all I ever seen from the program was a DOS program.
A DOS program
If you have installed POPFile you should have aPOPFile Program group
in Star/Programs. There you have access to two versions of the
Hello James
JO I'd like to take a message/messages and submit them to a Bayesian
JO filter to learn my good versus spam messages.
Try POPFile from http://popfile.sourceforge.net/
--
Clive Taylor
Using The Bat! v1.62i
Current version is 1.62 |
ON Thursday, February 20, 2003, 10:24:23 PM, you wrote:
JO Everyone's suggestions and comments are very appreciated.
Hi James,
I will assume that you have seen that there is an option in the filter
dialogs to execute an external program under actions.
The way I would do it would be to move
Clive Taylor wrote:
C Try POPFile from http://popfile.sourceforge.net/
Or try SpamPal http://www.spampal.org.uk/
--
Regards,
~John
Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
~John,
On 21-02-2003 15:44, you [~] wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
~ Clive Taylor wrote:
C Try POPFile from http://popfile.sourceforge.net/
~ Or try SpamPal http://www.spampal.org.uk/
Yeah, much better as it has both Bayesian and blacklist lookup.
--
greeting Best regards
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Peter,
@21-Feb-2003, 15:53 +0100 (14:53 UK time) Peter Fjelsten [PF] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
~ Or try SpamPal http://www.spampal.org.uk/
PF Yeah, much better as it has both Bayesian and blacklist lookup.
Blacklists are
Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
M Blacklists are dangerous and don't work IMNSHO.
thanks Marck, could you recommend how you would setup SpamPal ?
--
Regards,
~John
Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
Marck,
On 21-02-2003 16:01, you [M] wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
PF Yeah, much better as it has both Bayesian and blacklist lookup.
M Blacklists are dangerous and don't work IMNSHO.
M Anyone running a private mailserver on a dial-up has their IP listed
M in the blacklists.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi ~John,
@21-Feb-2003, 09:08 -0600 (15:08 UK time) ~John [j] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
M Blacklists are dangerous and don't work IMNSHO.
j thanks Marck, could you recommend how you would setup SpamPal ?
I don't use it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Peter,
@21-Feb-2003, 16:13 +0100 (15:13 UK time) Peter Fjelsten [PF] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
PF With the amount of spam today I feel this is the only way to go.
... if blacklists have a positive effect on incoming spam,
Hello Marck,
Could you share your spam filters with the group? It seems I am
constantly adding words and I know there must be another, simpler way.
--
Al Jacobus
Using TheBat! v1.62i on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600
Service Pack 1
Current
Hello Al,
Could you share your spam filters with the group? It seems I am
constantly adding words and I know there must be another, simpler way.
Use POPFile from http://popfile.sourceforge.net/ which takes care by
itself about adding words, and in any language.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A.
Hello Peter
~ Or try SpamPal http://www.spampal.org.uk/
PF Yeah, much better as it has both Bayesian and blacklist lookup.
I disagree. After one month's training Popfile is running at 99.5%
accuracy. I'm left with maybe one spam message every two days that's
not filtered into my spam folder.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Hi Peter,
In a message with [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 21 Feb 2003 16:13:35 , you typed:
M Anyone running a private mailserver on a dial-up has their IP listed
M in the blacklists.
PF There are many different blacklists. Some
Hello Clive,
I disagree. After one month's training Popfile is running at 99.5%
accuracy. I'm left with maybe one spam message every two days that's
not filtered into my spam folder. Impressive,
Fully agree with you about POPFile. I get an average of 30 spam
messages per day and the last time
Miguel A. Urech wrote:
I disagree. After one month's training Popfile is running at 99.5%
accuracy. I'm left with maybe one spam message every two days that's
not filtered into my spam folder. Impressive,
M Fully agree with you about POPFile. I get an average of 30 spam
M messages per day and
ON Friday, February 21, 2003, 5:46:39 PM, you wrote:
AJ Could you share your spam filters with the group? It seems I am
AJ constantly adding words and I know there must be another, simpler way.
Al,
Here is my tip:
After filtering out al know email try searching for To unsubscribe
in TEXT. I
Hello Mark,
I'm willing to give POPFile a try, however. What is the URL?
http://popfile.sourceforge.net/
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.61
Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
Hello ~John,
Have you guys used SpamPal ?
Yes, for a couple of days and decided to stay with POPFile.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.61
Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
Hello Thomas,
I haven't used spampal, but I see that it is not that easy to
configure, judging from the recent flushing of TBUDL by one Frank
Nijkamp. ;-)
But that is also because Spampal has the option to bounce (actually
a reply) spam messages which, to my knowledge, is completely wrong in
Hi Thomas and list,
On Friday, February 21, 2003 at 02:36:06 GMT +0700 (which was 20:36
where I live) Thomas Fernandez wrote (at least in parts) and made
these valuable points on the subject of Plug-in/Feature Request to
allow one to define a plugin to do something on a message or group of
Hello Michael,
I downloaded SpamPal two days ago because of people on this list. It
was very easy to setup and works awesome and invisible. I put all my
spam in a spam trap folder, as suggested on the author's website.
Once a day, I go into the spam trap folder and add users to my
whitelist
Good night Tim,
It was foretold that on 21-2-2003 06:53:20 GMT+1100 (which was
20:53:20 where I live) Tim would mumble:
snipped a bit
T For Windows, there's a simple installer that will install the minimum
T Perl needed.
Yep, that did the trick. Tnx.
--
Best regards,
Luc
Miguel,
On 21-02-2003 21:42, you [M] wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
M But that is also because Spampal has the option to bounce (actually
M a reply) spam messages which, to my knowledge, is completely wrong in
M concept. If bounce (or reply to) real spam it will get nowhere :)
?
Is that a
Peter Fjelsten wrote:
M But that is also because Spampal has the option to bounce (actually
M a reply) spam messages which, to my knowledge, is completely wrong in
M concept. If bounce (or reply to) real spam it will get nowhere :)
I didn't know SpamPal was capable of this... could you tell me
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Al,
21-Feb-2003, 08:46 -0800 (16:46 UK time) Al Jacobus [AJ] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
AJ Could you share your spam filters with the group? It seems I am
AJ constantly adding words and I know there must be another,
AJ simpler way.
First -
Hello,
Is there a way one can easily define an action to take on the
currently selected message(s)? Specifically using an external program?
How would I set this up?
I'd like to take a message/messages and submit them to a Bayesian
filter to learn my good versus spam messages. Right now, I have
36 matches
Mail list logo
