.
The problem lies elsewhere.
I tried transferring most of my BayesIt installation from the old
machine in order to preserve the training so perhaps there is
something amiss with one of the configuration files.
--
Best regards,
Scottmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat
.
SF I tried that. There are no new messages with malformed headers.
SF The problem lies elsewhere.
Oh well ... sigh
SF I tried transferring most of my BayesIt installation from the old
SF machine in order to preserve the training so perhaps there is
SF something amiss with one
Hello MikeD,
Tuesday, March 29, 2005, 11:49:39 AM, you wrote:
M3 Occasionally, that won't work and I have to do one extra
M3 step. After I have deleted BayesIt, I have to connect and get
M3 mail once. After that I can re-add BayesIt and it will work
M3 fine for a while again.
It works this way
Hello Scott,
Wednesday, March 30, 2005, 4:02:02 AM, you wrote:
SF Hello MikeD,
SF Tuesday, March 29, 2005, 11:49:39 AM, you wrote:
M3 I am not sure if the problem is triggered by a certain email
M3 message format or not. But my *guess* is that it has
M3 something to do with a miss-formed
Hello MikeD,
Wednesday, March 30, 2005, 5:08:46 AM, you wrote:
M3 I would be interested in hearing what (if anything) you find out.
It seems to be 2 accounts (rest OK) and the problem is
consistent, ie the mail is blocked every time. Also the Connection
Center locks up evry time so I have to
Hello TBUDL,
I just clean installed everything, and imported my installation
from a backup, but now BayesIt is giving me trouble.
Sometimes all my messages will download but not be imported,
then the connection centre just hangs. If I remove the plugin
everything works fine (except
Hello Scott,
Tuesday, March 29, 2005, 12:02:41 PM, you wrote:
SF Hello TBUDL,
SF I just clean installed everything, and imported my installation
SF from a backup, but now BayesIt is giving me trouble.
SF Sometimes all my messages will download but not be imported,
SF then the connection
Hello Roman Katzer everyone else,
on 21-Feb-2005 at 18:25 you (Roman Katzer) wrote:
I set up K9 and had it at 95% accuracy in about a week's training. It has
improved since.
I resetted my K9 stats after 100 days (nice that it supports two stats),
stat1, 105 days now, 98.5% accuracy (which
On Wednesday, February 23, 2005, 13:01:57, Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
Mr. SANI BAKOYO, the bank Manager Of Africa Continentale Bank Lagos
Nigeria ... would not like this. :-) :-) :-)
He doesn't. Would you _believe_ it, he even wrote me under a _false_
_name_ now!
The world is bad...
Roman
On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 18:07:21 +, Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
Attachments are allowed but only up to a list maximum of 25kb. TBBETA
has a higher ceiling of 40kb.
Thanks Marck, I stand corrected, and attached is my blacklist of RegEx
filters for Bayesit.
Feel free to try at your own risk
On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 13:16:45 +0100, Dick H wrote:
Hello Barry,
On Monday, February 21, 2005 at 09:01:40 GMT + (which was 10:01:40
where I live), Barry wrote and made these valuable points on the
subject of More observation on Bayesit!:
Hi
Well I'm still persevering!
I've now
On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 12:25:18 -0500, Roman Katzer wrote:
Furthermore: I never got BayesIt to work. The fact that there doesn't seem
to be documentation doesn't help. Even when the German magazine c't (highly
respected) tested several mail programs and their spam filtering
capabilities
filters for Bayesit.
Feel free to try at your own risk!!
Hmmm? Well, it was attached when it left me!
--
Best regards
Barry
barryh'at'kentra'dot'co'dot'uk
Using TheBat! version 3.0.1.33
and BayesIt! 0.8.0 Release
begin 644 blacklist.txt
M#0HC6S%=(%9I86=R82!;4UT-E-U8FIE8W0@;6%T8VAER`Z=EM5U]=S`L
M,GU
Hi
Well I'm still persevering!
I've now transcribed 83 different regex rules over to Bayesit. I extracted
them from my copy of MailWasher.
This seems to have made a dramatic improvement in spam catching. I've now
reduced the spam failures from 100% (really!) to below 54% in two days.
Looking
Hello Barry,
A reminder of what Barry on TBUDL typed on:
21 February 2005 at 10:05:26 GMT +0100
B If anyone else would like to try my rule set let me know and I'll email the
B file over.
Yes please Barry.
--
Best regards,Tony.
ON Monday, February 21, 2005, 10:01:40 AM, you wrote:
B If anyone else would like to try my rule set let me know and I'll email the
B file over.
Hi Barry,
I would love to try them.
How much do the slow down bayesIt?
--
Best regards,
Gerard
On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 11:47:44 +0100, Gerard wrote:
ON Monday, February 21, 2005, 10:01:40 AM, you wrote:
B If anyone else would like to try my rule set let me know and I'll email the
B file over.
Hi Barry,
I would love to try them.
How much do the slow down bayesIt?
Can you confirm
Hello Barry!
On Monday, February 21, 2005, 3:01 AM, you wrote:
Barry Hi
Barry I've now transcribed 83 different regex rules over to Bayesit. I
extracted
Barry them from my copy of MailWasher.
Barry If anyone else would like to try my rule set let me know and I'll email
the
Barry file over
On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 05:04:35 -0600, Ron Cameron wrote:
Hello Barry!
Send it to my email address below please.
You'll have to drop me a line Ron, Gmane hides your identity very well!
--
Best regards
Barry
barryh'at'kentra'dot'co'dot'uk
Using TheBat! version 3.0.1.33
and BayesIt! 0.8.0
Hello Barry,
A reminder of what Barry on TBUDL typed on:
21 February 2005 at 12:30:15 GMT +0100
B You'll have to drop me a line Ron, Gmane hides your identity very well!
Why not post it to this list, that way everyone who uses Bayesit can try it and
you won't have to send it a dozen times
On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 at 09:01:40 +, Barry wrote:
B Hi
B Well I'm still persevering!
B I've now transcribed 83 different regex rules over to Bayesit. I extracted
B them from my copy of MailWasher.
B This seems to have made a dramatic improvement in spam catching. I've now
B reduced the spam
Bayesit can try it
and
you won't have to send it a dozen times.
I thought attachments were not allowed. Marck's slapped my wrist before!
--
Best regards
Barry
barryh'at'kentra'dot'co'dot'uk
Using TheBat! version 3.0.1.33
and BayesIt! 0.8.0 Release
Hello Barry,
On Monday, February 21, 2005 at 09:01:40 GMT + (which was 10:01:40
where I live), Barry wrote and made these valuable points on the
subject of More observation on Bayesit!:
Hi
Well I'm still persevering!
I've now transcribed 83 different regex rules over to Bayesit. I
Hello Barry,
I've now transcribed 83 different regex rules over to Bayesit. I extracted
them from my copy of MailWasher.
This seems to have made a dramatic improvement in spam catching. I've now
reduced the spam failures from 100% (really!) to below 54% in two days.
this seems to be a great
Dear Barry,
@21-Feb-2005, 17:01 Barry [B] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Why not post it to this list, that way everyone who uses Bayesit can try it
and
you won't have to send it a dozen times.
B I thought attachments were not allowed. Marck's slapped my wrist before!
Attachments
at the Bayesit log file and I noticed that after every
use of TheBat! I was getting:
17.02.2005 15:03:46 Current recalculation session is interrupted.
When I use TheBat! to check my email I'll start the program to download the
mail and if there is nothing of interest I'll junk the Spam and close
Hi
Well, this is my 3rd and last attempt to get BayesIt to work. I guess I've
wasted enough time with it now.
I removed all traces of BayesIt from my install 'cos it just wasn't
working, despite it having over 1,000 spam mails to train on which I had
downloaded from TheBatWorld web site. I
Hallo Barry,
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 12:58:46 +GMT (17-2-2005, 13:58 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
B Having a clean install I now find that BayesIt is complaining that the
B dictionaries are either corrupt or not there.
B Well its right on that one; they aren't there!
B But surely on a new
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 14:16:58 +0100, Roelof Otten wrote:
Did you tell BayesIt where it should store its stuff?
Options - Preferences - Anti-spam - BayesIt - Configure - Options
Hi Roelof
Yes I did, and that's what I'm finding so frustrating. I think I am doing
everything as I should
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 at 14:24:45 +, Barry wrote:
B I don't like being beaten so I decided to try again with a clean install
B but now I don't appear to have any dictionaries.
B Mail Washer Pro is beginning to look very attractive! :-)
I'm not so impressed with BayesIt right now either
Hello Barry,
On Thursday, February 17, 2005 at 14:24:45 GMT + (which was
15:24:45 where I live), Barry wrote and made these valuable points on
the subject of Why am I finding BayesIt so difficult?:
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 14:16:58 +0100, Roelof Otten wrote:
Did you tell BayesIt where
I'm not so impressed with BayesIt right now either. Doesn't seem to
do a thing.
Same here - I've been training it for months now with hundreds and
thousands lots of good emails and spam emails, but to no avail.
Kind regards,
Anselm
--
Anselm Buehling - Translations EN/RU DE
[EMAIL
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 14:24:45 +, Barry wrote:
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 14:16:58 +0100, Roelof Otten wrote:
Did you tell BayesIt where it should store its stuff?
Options - Preferences - Anti-spam - BayesIt - Configure - Options
Hi Roelof
Yes I did, and that's what I'm finding so
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 14:24:45 +, Barry wrote:
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 14:16:58 +0100, Roelof Otten wrote:
Did you tell BayesIt where it should store its stuff?
Options - Preferences - Anti-spam - BayesIt - Configure - Options
Hi Roelof
Yes I did, and that's what I'm finding so
Hello David,
A reminder of what David Calvarese on TBUDL typed on:
17 February 2005 at 15:32:23 GMT +0100
DC I'm not so impressed with BayesIt right now either. Doesn't seem to
DC do a thing. I'm trying out Bayes Filter ATM though.
It used to work here but for some reason it doesn't work
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 at 17:40:56 +, Tony Boom wrote:
TB A reminder of what David Calvarese on TBUDL typed on:
TB 17 February 2005 at 15:32:23 GMT +0100
DC I'm not so impressed with BayesIt right now either. Doesn't seem to
DC do a thing. I'm trying out Bayes Filter ATM though.
TB
Hallo Barry,
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 17:36:26 +GMT (17-2-2005, 18:36 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
B There's definitely a problem with 0.8.0
B I reinstalled 0.7.3, and after training both spam and nonspam dictionaries
B were created.
B 0.8.0 does *not* do this!
You're experiencing other
Hi
I don't know what I'm doing wrong but I must be doing something wrong!
Bayesit is now reporting 100% Spam Errors
This is right 'cos I'm having to mark all incoming spam. Nothing is being
'junked'.
Spam Frequency Dict: 77 letters 7851 words
Non-spam dict: 1060 letters 32965 words
Spam
the words in the message
text get a score. BayesIt collects these words with an individual ranking
in a database (something like a statement: the word 'telephone' appeared
in ham emails 15 times). Over time it becomes clearer and clearer which
words appear in spam email and which in ham email
Hi all
I've been trying out Bayesit now found a few days and I'm struggling to
come to terms with how this plug-in is *supposed* to work.
It seems to me that in simple terms the plugin assigns a 'score' to each
email, and dependent on the score allocated TB determines what ultimately
happens
better results.
Thanks Marck, I'll continue to persevere. :-)
--
Best regards
Barry
Using TB version 3.0.1.33
and BayesIt! 0.8.0 Release
Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Hello TB List,
as there have been several requests for an English tutorial for the
BayesIt-Plugin and because there is only a Russian one available, we
published since some minutes an English one.
It explains the basic functions of the plugin with screenshots and
has also a FAQ inside
ON Friday, November 19, 2004, 11:46:17 PM, you wrote:
NL But I now have a spambase of over 4000
NL messages to work off of.
Hi Neal,
I only have 450 to work with sofar, but I would not like to trade with you :-)
I agree that BasesIt filter does a good job.
My settings are similar to yours.
--
Back when Bayesit was a addin filter that didn't come with the_bat I
had it working fine, I trained it with thousands of spam messages.
But I lost all that when I reformated recently. and I installed the
latest greatest BAT and I noticed it came with Bayesit, I choose to
let it install it and I've
.
Like someone pointed out, BayesIt is hit or miss...it either works for
you or it doesn't. I couldn't get it to work well for a long time. But
on one install it just magically worked. I receive about 1200 e-mails
daily, 30% SPAM. I have maintained an overall accuracy rate of 99.87%
for 2 months now
Hello Chris,
Why does the Bayesit plugin not work very well?
It will pick up an occasional spam but misses most.
It will still fall for the same messages even after I mark them as
spam.
--
~John
{Race Car spelled backwards is Race Car!}
The_Bat! Version 3.0.2.2 Rush
http
Hello John,
Friday, November 19, 2004, 9:02:30 PM, you wrote:
Hello Chris,
Why does the Bayesit plugin not work very well?
It will pick up an occasional spam but misses most.
It will still fall for the same messages even after I mark them as
spam.
I have started to notice
Hello John,
Friday, November 19, 2004, 4:02:30 PM, you wrote:
JM Why does the Bayesit plugin not work very well?
JM It will pick up an occasional spam but misses most.
JM It will still fall for the same messages even after I mark them as
JM spam.
JM
Spammers have gotten hip to how
Hi John and Group,
Why does the Bayesit plugin not work very well?
It will pick up an occasional spam but misses most.
It will still fall for the same messages even after I mark them as
spam.
I have have really good luck with Bayesit no that it and TBv3 are
stable. My Out of 100
JM Why does the Bayesit plugin not work very well? It will pick up
JM an occasional spam but misses most. It will still fall for the
JM same messages even after I mark them as spam.
M3 Spammers have gotten hip to how Bayesian filtering works and have
M3 devised ways to get around
How do you install this Bayesit filter?
--
Kind Regards
Dave Thomas
Product Manager
Psionet
Tel +27 21 683 1192
Fax +27 21 683 1196
Web: www.psion.co.za
Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com
At 12:24 [GMT+0200] on Wednesday November 3 (actual time - 6:24pm on Wednesday
in Perth, Western Australia), you wrote:
[snips]
Dave How do you install this Bayesit filter?
I did it by downloading and installing Spampal :-)
After a fair bit of testing, I find it's better than any
Hello Dave,
Wednesday, November 3, 2004, 5:24:51 AM, you wrote:
DT How do you install this Bayesit filter?
First unarchive the TBP file someplace in either the TB executable
tree or the data tree. I put mine in Prg_files/TheBat/Bayesit
Go to Options / PLugins.
Click add and then point
Thanks Mike
==
MikeD Hello Dave,
MikeD Wednesday, November 3, 2004, 5:24:51 AM, you wrote:
DT How do you install this Bayesit filter?
MikeD First unarchive the TBP file someplace in either the TB executable
MikeD tree or the data tree. I put mine in Prg_files/TheBat/Bayesit
MikeD
Hello Dave,
Wednesday, November 3, 2004, 9:42:05 AM, you wrote:
DT Thanks Mike
Always happy to be able to give back in some small way for all the
help I have gotten g
--
Best regards,
MikeDmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat! v3.0.2.1 on Windows ME 4.90 Build
Hello, everyone!
I have just read Alexey Vinogradov's Web page on The
Bat!'s BayesIt! anti-spam plug-in, at the following URL:
http://klirik.narod.ru/usefuls/bayesiteng.htm
(The Russian version is at the following URL.)
http://klirik.narod.ru/usefuls/bayesit.htm
ASIDE: For those of you who have
Where do I find the link to the latest version
--
Kind Regards
Dave Thomas
Product Manager
Psionet
Tel +27 21 683 1192
Fax +27 21 683 1196
Web: www.psion.co.za
Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
Hello Dave,
Tuesday, November 2, 2004, 6:31:10 AM, you wrote:
DT Where do I find the link to the latest version
Sorry, I no longer have that link handy and I cannot read the site
well enough to find the link sigh
Hopefully someone else will be able to post a copy of the link for
you.
--
Best
Thanks Mike, yes hopefully someone will
==
MikeD Hello Dave,
MikeD Tuesday, November 2, 2004, 6:31:10 AM, you wrote:
DT Where do I find the link to the latest version
MikeD Sorry, I no longer have that link handy and I cannot read the site
MikeD well enough to find the link sigh
Tue, 2 Nov 2004 13:31:10 +0200 (6:31 AM EST here) Dave Thomas wrote:
Where do I find the link to the latest [Bayesit] version
You might want to try
www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/bayesit/bayesit.lng .
Using: The Bat! v2.12.00, BayesIt! 0.5.9,
MyMacros 1.11, gMacrosPlugin 0.80
Hallo Dave,
On Tue, 2 Nov 2004 15:42:33 +0200GMT (2-11-2004, 14:42 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
DT Thanks Mike, yes hopefully someone will
DT ==
MikeD Hello Dave,
moderator
Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not
just to the person being replied
Hello Dan,
Tuesday, November 2, 2004, 8:46:34 AM, you wrote:
DG Tue, 2 Nov 2004 13:31:10 +0200 (6:31 AM EST here) Dave Thomas wrote:
Where do I find the link to the latest [Bayesit] version
DG You might want to try
DG www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/bayesit/bayesit.lng .
I believe
Hello MikeD,
On Tuesday, November 02, 2004 at 10:56:50 GMT -0500 (which was
16:56:50 where I live), MikeD (3) wrote and made these valuable points
on the subject of Bayesit:
Hello Dan,
Tuesday, November 2, 2004, 8:46:34 AM, you wrote:
DG Tue, 2 Nov 2004 13:31:10 +0200 (6:31 AM EST here
On Wednesday, October 20, 2004, 2:10:40 AM, MikeD wrote:
and I should also mention that the newest version is 0.7.3 and
since you are going to have to go through all that anyway, you might
want to get this version before you go through all that. It is much
improved over the version that was
I'm sure this is a FAQ but I haven't been paying attention...
Just upgraded to TB 3.01, no problems, but BayesIt has stopped spotting ANY spam - not
that it ever was any good at it (about 1 in 3 with 2.x). Do I have to retrain the new
version?
--
Regards,
G.
mailto
Hello G.,
Tuesday, October 19, 2004, 9:24:45 AM, you wrote:
GM I'm sure this is a FAQ but I haven't been paying attention...
GM Just upgraded to TB 3.01, no problems, but BayesIt has
GM stopped spotting ANY spam - not that it ever was any good at it
GM (about 1 in 3 with 2.x). Do I have
Hello MikeD,
Tuesday, October 19, 2004, 10:08:07 AM, you wrote:
M3 Hello G.,
M3 Tuesday, October 19, 2004, 9:24:45 AM, you wrote:
GM I'm sure this is a FAQ but I haven't been paying attention...
GM Just upgraded to TB 3.01, no problems, but BayesIt has
GM stopped spotting ANY spam
processed by BayesIT! and not deleted from the server.
MLW I am using a series of OR statements in the filter, and it looks like
MLW the ones that get through have more than one of my special words.
MLW So, how can I make a filter that will delete from the serve any email
MLW that has one or more
anything with certain words in the subject. Many of
MLW these still get processed by BayesIT! and not deleted from the server.
MLW I am using a series of OR statements in the filter, and it looks like
MLW the ones that get through have more than one of my special words.
MLW So, how can I make a filter
Is there a way to see what score BayesIt gave a message?
Just upgraded to 3.0.1.33 and use BayesIt for the forst time (dodn#t work
before).
Roman
--
What is Snow White's favorite drink? Seven up.
Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL
On Saturday, 16 October 2004 at 18:56 (UK time), Roman Katzer said:
Is there a way to see what score BayesIt gave a message?
Just upgraded to 3.0.1.33 and use BayesIt for the forst time (dodn#t work
before).
Check the 'Filter' lines of the Account Log. Not the best way but as far
as I know
Hello Stuart,
Saturday, October 16, 2004, 9:06:23 AM, you wrote:
SC Michael is using Version 3 which does not have the alternative tab.
I guess I will have to bite the bullet soon and move up to 3 g
--
Best regards,
MikeDmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat!
On Saturday, October 16, 2004, 14:36:57, Paul White wrote:
Check the 'Filter' lines of the Account Log. Not the best way but as far
as I know, the only way.
Thanks, I'll try that and promise to proof-read my messages in the future
:)
Roman
--
Foreign Aid - taxing poor people in rich
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I get some pretty rude email spam. I have setup a filter to delete
from the server anything with certain words in the subject. Many of
these still get processed by BayesIT! and not deleted from the server.
I am using a series of OR statements
successfully combined BayesIT and Bayes Anti spam to work
together?
--
Michael L. Wilson, MBA
Ecclesiastic Philosopher
Critic
Teacher
:einsteinyoyo:
==
Using The Bat! 3.0.1.33
Windows XP 5.1 (2600) Service Pack 2)
Ponder this: The same fire
Hello Greg,
Sunday, October 10, 2004, 8:21:19 PM, you wrote:
GS Hello MikeD,
GS Thursday, October 7, 2004, 10:11:36 AM, MikeD (3) wrote:
Click Add and then point it at the 'bayesit' folder and select the
'bayesit.tbp'
GS Done.
That will get things started. Next you have to start showing
Hello MikeD,
Thursday, October 7, 2004, 10:11:36 AM, MikeD (3) wrote:
Click Add and then point it at the 'bayesit' folder and select the
'bayesit.tbp'
Done.
That will get things started. Next you have to start showing it what
is good email (i.e. 'ham') and what is spam (that is train
Hello Greg,
Sunday, October 10, 2004, 8:21:19 PM, Greg Strong wrote:
If you have saves a lot of spam and ham samples, you can train it on
those saved letters. That will speed up the training process.
How do you do this?
,- [ per mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] in TBBETA ]
| Just select the 500
Hi there, how do I configure the filter in version 3?
--
Kind Regards
Dave Thomas
Product Manager
Psionet
Tel +27 21 683 1192
Fax +27 21 683 1196
Web: www.psion.co.za
Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
ON Thursday, October 7, 2004, 3:53:29 PM, you wrote:
DT Hi there, how do I configure the filter in version 3?
Hi Dave,
Go to Options-preferencesanti spam and select Bayes Filter. Now press
the config button and you will find all the options.
PS:
Your cut mark is not working it is missing a
Hello Dave,
Thursday, October 7, 2004, 8:53:29 AM, you wrote:
DT Hi there, how do I configure the filter in version 3?
You have to unarchive it and it's support files. I keep mine in a
folder called (big surprise) 'bayesit' that is in the 'TheBat' program
tree.
Next you start TB and go
Hello Code,
Tuesday, September 28, 2004, 11:51:47 PM, you wrote:
Can you guys suggest a better alternative?
http://popfile.sourceforge.net - its not a TB plugin, its a local
proxy. But it rawks! :-) Using it for 3 months now, 98% accuracy...
--
Best regards,
Alexander
Hello Code,
Tuesday, September 28, 2004, 11:51:47 PM, you wrote:
Can you guys suggest a better alternative?
http://popfile.sourceforge.net - its not a TB plugin, its a local
proxy. But it rawks! :-) Using it for 3 months now, 98% accuracy...
But are you checking more than six email
Hi admin,
Hello Code,
Tuesday, September 28, 2004, 11:51:47 PM, you wrote:
Can you guys suggest a better alternative?
http://popfile.sourceforge.net - its not a TB plugin, its a local
proxy. But it rawks! :-) Using it for 3 months now, 98% accuracy...
aacu But are you checking more than
Hello Neal,
Tuesday, September 28, 2004, 5:58:14 PM, you wrote:
NL One way is to look at the statistics BayesIt generates. The would be
NL found here:
Options Preferences Plug-ins BayesIt Information
NL Highlight the BayesIt plugin and click the info button and you will
NL see a large
I have a sneaking suspicion that although BayesIT is filtering, that
it isn't actually learning from messages subsequently not filterd but
then marked as junk.
How could I determine whether it IS in fact learning from these?
--
Marten Gallagher
Annery Kiln Web Design
www.annerykiln.co.uk
Using
I started training BayesIt 0.5.9 a few months ago with thousands of
spam and non-spam messages. Despite this, it's catching only about
10%. I continue to mark the missed stuff as junk, but either BayesIt
just can't do the job or the spammers are outwitting it. Either way,
I'm not prepared
I started training BayesIt 0.5.9 a few months ago with thousands of
spam and non-spam messages. Despite this, it's catching only about
10%. I continue to mark the missed stuff as junk, but either BayesIt
just can't do the job or the spammers are outwitting it. Either way,
I'm
Hello Code,
Tuesday, September 28, 2004, 5:51:47 PM, you wrote:
C2 I started training BayesIt 0.5.9 a few months ago with thousands of
C2 spam and non-spam messages. Despite this, it's catching only about
C2 10%. I continue to mark the missed stuff as junk, but either BayesIt
C2 just can't do
Hi Marten,
I have a sneaking suspicion that although BayesIT is filtering, that
it isn't actually learning from messages subsequently not filterd but
then marked as junk.
How could I determine whether it IS in fact learning from these?
One way is to look at the statistics BayesIt generates
Hello Code2,
On Tuesday, September 28, 2004, 5:44 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
C2 I started training BayesIt 0.5.9 a few months ago with thousands of
C2 spam and non-spam messages. Despite this, it's catching only about
C2 10%. I continue to mark the missed stuff as junk, but either BayesIt
C2
Hello Steve,
Saturday, September 25, 2004, 7:10:59 PM, you wrote:
SMK Neal,
SMK I'm, using 06.6, which I thought was the latest version. BayesIt hasn't
SMK worked well for me since the version that came with The Bat 2.12; I don't
SMK remember its version number.
That would 0.5.11. It is what
Hello MikeD,
Sunday, September 26, 2004, 8:08:39 PM, you wrote:
SMK I'm, using 06.6, which I thought was the latest version. BayesIt hasn't
SMK worked well for me since the version that came with The Bat 2.12; I don't
SMK remember its version number.
That would 0.5.11. It is what I continue
Does anybody know if there a comprehensive BayesIt web page in English, such
as the Russian http://www.ritlabs.com/ru/solutions/BayesIt.php. If I switch
the language selector on the Russian page to English, nothing happens. I
tried http://www.ritlabs.com/en/solutions/BayesIt.php, but only get
Hi Steve
Does anybody know if there a comprehensive BayesIt web page in English, such
as the Russian http://www.ritlabs.com/ru/solutions/BayesIt.php.
I'd like to know if there is one, too.
I'm frustrated enough with BayesIt's inability to recognize junk mail, that
I'm ready to switch back
.0.6.0, trained it and all was well; no white
NL or black lists. I just stuck v0.6.8 into the mix and it seems OK.
Well, I have had consistent crashes using BayesIt and still get a
Exception trap in training_the_base error on occasion. Which ends up
with BayesIt no longer operational and TB hanging
Hi Marck,
Well, I have had consistent crashes using BayesIt and still get a
Exception trap in training_the_base error on occasion. Which ends up
with BayesIt no longer operational and TB hanging on exit. These
crashes are far less frequent with the 0.6.8 release, for sure and
previous
Neal,
I'm, using 06.6, which I thought was the latest version. BayesIt hasn't
worked well for me since the version that came with The Bat 2.12; I don't
remember its version number.
Do you have the URL for 0.6.8? The web site for BayesIt
http://klirik.narod.ru/usefuls/bayesiteng.htm lists 0.4
:-(.
And there is no way you the whitelist can be controlled?
MDP So I have switched back to BayesIt, seeing the positive feedback on
MDP this new release.
I've heard of nothing but problems with BayseIt, much as I would like
it to work.
MDP I find that BayesIt is not trapping any spam at all on my
, but was that the
point? I'd have thought that I'd want the source of non-junk mail to
be white-listed. But why should all mail addressed to me suddenly act
like it's white-listed?
MDP So I have switched back to BayesIt, seeing the positive feedback
MDP on this new release.
PJ I've heard of nothing
101 - 200 of 631 matches
Mail list logo
