Allie Martin wrote:
Spam fighting moved you away from TB!??? This is so sad. :(((
Damn that spam.
Hi, Allie.
:-) Actually spam was just one of several factors, including all
the IMAP issues and concerns about the haphazard direction of
development.
Let me rephrase it: I'm almost at the point
Hi Michael,
On Sat, 24 Jul 2004, at 22:50:28 [GMT-0700] (which was Sun, 15:50:28
Australian Eastern Time) you wrote:
I love SpamPal, but with this persistent time out issue some of my
accounts get hung. With BayesIt this timeout bug does not happen.
Spampal is still installed
On Saturday, July 24, 2004, 11:22:34 PM, Darrin wrote:
DR Hello,
DR I have K9 right now. Dont know much about bayesit plugin. Where do I
DR get it and where can I find more info on how to use it and install
DR it?
DR Thanks
Hi Darrin!
I'm very happy with a program called, SpamBayes
Hi John,
On 7/25/2004 9:27 PM my time, John wrote:
JP I find SpamPal to be almost faultless.
Sounds like I will have to look into spampal. Thanks
--
Darrin
WinXP Home Service Pack 1
Tbat! 2.12.00
pgpOlcskm7aIn.pgp
Description: PGP signature
a stand-alone
Bayes type filter may be the better choice (of course, one can disable all
DNS blacklists in SpamPal, and only use the Bayesian plugin, but in that
case the BayesIt that integrates into TheBat allows smoother operation).
Sidenote: IMO, RegEx isn't really an option the average user
Hi Darrin,
On Sunday, July 25, 2004 06:45 your local time, which was 14:45 my local
time, Darrin Rich [DR] wrote;
JP I find SpamPal to be almost faultless.
DR Sounds like I will have to look into spampal. Thanks
I've been using SpamPal for nearly 2 weeks now and after the initial
learning and
Hello,
I have K9 right now. Dont know much about bayesit plugin. Where do I
get it and where can I find more info on how to use it and install
it?
Thanks
--
Darrin
WinXP Home Service Pack 1
Tbat! 2.12.00
pgpLv2xqoEyGs.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Darrin,
On Saturday, July 24, 2004 , at 20:22:34[GMT -0700](which was 8:22 PM
where I live) you wrote (at least in part):
DR Hello,
DR I have K9 right now. Dont know much about bayesit plugin. Where do I
DR get it and where can I find
Hi Michael,
On 7/24/2004 8:26 PM my time, Michael wrote:
MLW Because BayesIT has no regEx and no DSNBL ability, it is hard to
MLW train. There is also no black/white list ability
So do you recommend K9? I find K9 to work fairly decent for me. Im not
sure what else is out there and what works
decent for me. Im not
DR sure what else is out there and what works better.
I've messed with popfile and k9 and spampal. Got me which is best.
BayesIt is the fastest
Michael L. Wilson, MBA :usflag:
Ecclesiastic Philosopher
Teacher
Critic
If you push something hard enough, it will fall over
Hi Darrin,
On Sat, 24 Jul 2004, at 20:32:52 [GMT-0700] (which was Sun, 13:32:52
Australian Eastern Time) you wrote:
So do you recommend K9? I find K9 to work fairly decent for me. Im not
sure what else is out there and what works better.
I find SpamPal to be almost faultless.
--
John
get hung. With BayesIt this timeout bug does not happen.
Spampal is still installed and waiting for a timeout fix so that my
accounts do not hang when they get out of sync with spampal.
Michael L. Wilson, MBA :usflag:
Ecclesiastic Philosopher
Teacher
Critic
If you push something hard
TBUDL,
Is there any way to find out what any given message scored when
BayseIt checked it? I am working my way down for the threshold, and
am currently at 20. I have seen others needed to put it at 10, so
maybe that will be the trick. It has not moved a single message yet.
--
Tim Musson
Hello Tim,
On 23 Jul 2004 at 15:09:56 -0400 GMT [21:09 CEST] you wrote:
TM Is there any way to find out what any given message scored when
TM BayseIt checked it?
working directory\bayesit.log
--
Cheers,
Andre
Träume nicht dein Leben,
sondern lebe deinen Traum!
Greetings All,
There is an option in BayesIt! 5.5 for [use whitelist kludges]
What is the format of this list?
--
Michael L. Wilson, MBA :usflag:
Ecclesiastic Philosopher
Teacher
Critic
Big Brother is watching - George Orwell (1984
On Thu, 6 May 2004 22:12:41 +0700, Thomas Fernandez
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Options / Preferences / Plugins. Delete the one you are not using.
Should be OK then - I think. Please let us know.
Yes it did, thanks.
And sorry for omitting the confirmation (while reading back I came
across this
Hi Michael,
On Tuesday, July 13, 2004 14:24 your local time, which was 22:24 my
local time, Michael Wilson [MLW] wrote;
MLW It has got to be SpamPal. Free and everything you say, except not a
MLW plug-in.
I've decided to give SpamPal ago, and it seems to be working well, but
I'm having a
Dear list,
Mary said:
MB Among my first complaints here, during the evaluation
MB phase of my acquaintance with The Bat!, was that I
MB could not understand the Help file. It will tell you
MB what something does--ocasionally in words that mean
MB something to a newcomer--but it never tells you
MB
Monday, July 12, 2004, 11:03:30 PM, Mary wrote:
MB Hmm. I've been joking about the time machine :timemachine: but I
MB wonder. Could our mails be lost in here: :tm:
A job is never finished until the paperwork is done. :-D
--
Regards,
Plan9 :plan9:
Two strings walk into a bar. The first
Hi fellow users,
I've been using the bayesit plug-in for quite a few months now and it
was seamless. But, things aren't so effective now and I've decided to
potentially look elsewhere for my anti-spam solution.
Programs I've looked at so far include (in not particular order);
1 - K9
2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cannot find a quick template TidySub
Hello Chris,
On Tuesday, July 13, 2004 , at 22:19:27[GMT +0100](which was 2:19 PM
where I live) you wrote (at least in part):
CW 1 - Ideally, I'd like a plug-in as it's one less program to run, but this
CW
Hi Chris,
On Tuesday, July 13, 2004 22:19 our local time, Chris Weaven [CW] wrote;
CW My requirements are as follows;
CW 1 - Ideally, I'd like a plug-in as it's one less program to run, but this
CW doesn't seem to be the case
CW 2 - I'd like it to mark somewhere that the mail is suspected as
Hi Michael,
On Tuesday, July 13, 2004 14:24 your local time, which was 22:24 my
local time, Michael Wilson [MLW] wrote;
CW 3 - Must support TLS connections
MLW It has got to be SpamPal. Free and everything you say, except not a
MLW plug-in.
Looks good, but requires something such as stunnel
Hallo Allister,
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 17:34:35 +1200GMT (12-7-2004, 7:34 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
AJ Monday, July 12, 2004, 12:06:58 PM, Mary wrote (amongst other stuff):
MB In defense of RitLabs: the improvements that are being made in The
MB Bat! are coming along so rapidly that any Help
Hallo Roelof,
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 17:29:30 +0200GMT (12-7-2004, 17:29 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
RO On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 17:34:35 +1200GMT (12-7-2004, 7:34 +0200, where I
RO live), you wrote:
It surprised me somewhat that this piece of shit didn't appear any
sooner on this list.
I wanted
Hello Roelof!
On Monday, July 12, 2004, 6:39 PM, you wrote:
RO It surprised me somewhat that this piece of [see h2g2 for
RO translation] didn't appear any sooner on this list.
I think I may have been the only one to notice. :) And I forgave you
immediately, for the sake of your budgies and
Monday, July 12, 2004, 7:39:52 PM, Roelof wrote:
RO The weirdest thing however, is that my real reply, composed an hour
RO later was distributed within a few minutes, while my inadvertent (is
RO that the correct word) reply took over seven hours to get back to me.
For me weird things have been
Hi Plan9
-
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004, at 22:54:04 [GMT -0400] (which was 7:54 PM where
I live) you wrote:
Monday, July 12, 2004, 7:39:52 PM, Roelof wrote:
snip
For me weird things have been happening all day as far a e-mail is
concerned. I have been
Hello Plan9!
On Monday, July 12, 2004, 9:54 PM, you wrote:
P Monday, July 12, 2004, 7:39:52 PM, Roelof wrote:
RO The weirdest thing however, is that my real reply, composed an hour
RO later was distributed within a few minutes, while my inadvertent (is
RO that the correct word) reply took over
On Monday, July 12, 2004 @ 1:34:35 PM, Allister Jenks wrote:
[snips]
MB In defense of RitLabs: the improvements that are being made in The
MB Bat! are coming along so rapidly that any Help file would soon be
MB obsolete. I consider that I am running an obsolete version, and I have
MB the latest
I finally got BayesIt trained and it caught its first bit of spam
today. :) A few questions:
1. Is ongoing training necessary only when BayesIt misses spam or
mis-identifies non-spam, or is something more required?
2. Is there a point where training BayesIt doesn't noticeably improve
accuracy
Hello Code,
On 11 Jul 2004 at 10:28:06 -0700 GMT [19:28 CEST] you wrote:
C2 1. Is ongoing training necessary only when BayesIt misses spam or
C2 mis-identifies non-spam, or is something more required?
You only need to correct mistakes.
C2 2. Is there a point where training BayesIt doesn't
Hallo Code,
On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 10:28:06 -0700GMT (11-7-2004, 19:28 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
C2 And for you Ritlabs guys watching: you've *got* to get the help files
C2 updated and/or a manual produced. BayesIt would be a lot less
C2 intimidating with some instruction.
I had
On 7/11/04, at 1:29 PM, Code 2 sent the following:
Code I finally got BayesIt trained and it caught its first bit of spam
Code today. :) A few questions:
SNIP
I finally gave up on the Bayeslt it was not catching that much spam and classed
personal
good mail as spam. I had be trying
for the full public release very shortly.
And *then* more things will start to receive the Bat Team's attention
for improvement.
You are not alone in being disappointed in Bayesit. I didn't even try
it when I saw some of the longest-term, most skilled Bat users
complaining about it.
But I encourage
Monday, July 12, 2004, 12:06:58 PM, Mary wrote (amongst other stuff):
MB In defense of RitLabs: the improvements that are being made in The
MB Bat! are coming along so rapidly that any Help file would soon be
MB obsolete. I consider that I am running an obsolete version, and I have
MB the latest
this and flag as Junk (training
GD BayesIt)
C I don't think bayesit works with imap.
GD Spam that reaches TB also gets marked as Junk (more BayesIt training)
C So how many spam and non-spam messages have you marked? The information
C under preferences: does the size of the dictionaries increase?
Well
Hello Andre,
Saturday, June 19, 2004, 12:25:11 PM, you wrote:
AW Hello Richard,
AW On 19 Jun 2004 at 05:33:38 +0500 GMT [02:33 CEST] you wrote:
RHS I'm using BayesIT, and have no problems with it. It's catching about
RHS 95% of the spam, which I hope will increase eventually, but even then
RHS
Hello Graham,
Monday, June 21, 2004, 9:22:21 AM, you wrote:
GD Hello Andre,
GD Saturday, June 19, 2004, 12:25:11 PM, you wrote:
AW Hello Richard,
AW On 19 Jun 2004 at 05:33:38 +0500 GMT [02:33 CEST] you wrote:
RHS I'm using BayesIT, and have no problems with it. It's catching about
RHS 95
enabled it) that
says training.
But don't forget to train BayesIt also on Ham. If possible, take the
same amout of ham than of spam.
--
Kind Regards
:Feli:
The Bat! 2.11.04 on Windows 2000 5.0 2195 Service Pack 4
Current version is 2.11.02
Hello Fredrik,
Monday, June 21, 2004, 9:33:20 AM, you wrote:
FB Hello Graham,
FB Monday, June 21, 2004, 9:22:21 AM, you wrote:
GD I would be happy if I could catch 1 spam... :-(
GD I did not have this problem with BayesIt 0.4g, I have followed the advice
GD to delete all previous
. That's the new way
to train, it even shows a small dialog (if you have enabled it) that
says training.
FW But don't forget to train BayesIt also on Ham. If possible, take the
FW same amout of ham than of spam.
Ohh, that is interesting, that may be why I have problems with the
filtering :)
I
Hello Fredrik,
On Mon, 21 Jun 2004 10:28:20 +0200GMT(21.06.2004, 10:28 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
I guess that I have to select lots of HAM (nonspam?) and click Mark
as not SPAM?
that's it :-)
--
Kind Regards
:Feli:
The Bat! 2.11.04 on Windows 2000 5.0 2195 Service Pack 4
Hi Feli,
On Mon, 21 Jun 2004, at 12:23:12 [GMT+0200] (which was 20:23:12 Australian
Eastern Time) you wrote:
The Bat! 2.11.04
Where did you get that version from?
--
John Phillips, Sydney, Australia
Using The Bat! v2.11.02 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600
Service Pack 1
What has four legs
Hello John,
On Mon, 21 Jun 2004 20:57:30 +1000GMT(21.06.2004, 12:57 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
The Bat! 2.11.04
Where did you get that version from?
go to http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/, register as beta tester and
download the latest version.
--
Kind Regards
:Feli:
The Bat!
On 21 Jun 2004 at 09:22:21 you wrote:
GD I would be happy if I could catch 1 spam... :-(
GD I have SpamAssassin running on the mail server, it throws certain Spam into an IMAP
GD account for manual proofing - I mark all this and flag as Junk (training
GD BayesIt)
I don't think bayesit works
Hello Chenoa,
Monday, June 21, 2004, 12:29:31 PM, you wrote:
C So how many spam and non-spam messages have you marked?
I was at upwards of 1,000 posts in spam and almost that many ham posts
before I was getting solid results, but this was under the earlier
build. I am a bit out of date at the
Hi Feli,
On Mon, 21 Jun 2004, at 14:00:21 [GMT+0200] (which was 22:00:21 Australian
Eastern Time) you wrote:
Where did you get that version from?
go to http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/, register as beta tester and
download the latest version.
Thanks, beta versions previously showed as
Hello Richard,
Saturday, June 19, 2004, 2:33:38 AM, you wrote:
RHS Saturday, June 19, 2004, 2:13:08 AM, you wrote:
aacu I change to POPFiel from weeks of frsutration with BayesIt slowing
aacu down things, crashing the Bat etc.
RHS I'm using BayesIT, and have no problems with it. It's catching
Hello Richard,
On 19 Jun 2004 at 05:33:38 +0500 GMT [02:33 CEST] you wrote:
RHS I'm using BayesIT, and have no problems with it. It's catching about
RHS 95% of the spam, which I hope will increase eventually, but even then
RHS that's only one or two a day that get through.
Mine is at 99.8
Hi TBUDL!
Sure you did, but you realize of course that that server wasn't your
ISP's, but your Popfile proxy.
No, I didn't POPFile just redirected the deletion to the server.
Worked well as long as I used it.
[snip a bunch of stuff I don't understood]
Maybe you got me wrong. I had no problem
Hi Folks,
Saturday, June 19, 2004, 5:45:36 PM, you wrote:
I use 'Mailwasher' but decided to give BayesIt a go.
I seem to be missing the 'spamdict.bye' file though, so could someone send me a copy
off list?
TIA.
Cheers.
Dougie
Douglas Coull, Langbank, Scotland
Lat 55.92445 N Long
Hello,
I'm playing with BayesIt (0.5.5) having used Popfile happily for a few
years now.
All seems very nice, but I used to have a rule for TB to remove
messages marked as spam from the server. Is there some way that I can
do this with BayesIt?
I've tried assigning a rule to the Junk mail
Hi Nick!
All seems very nice, but I used to have a rule for TB to remove
messages marked as spam from the server. Is there some way that I can
do this with BayesIt?
As far as I know this is not yet possible. That's something that I
would like to have also :-)
--
Regards,
Raymund
Hello Nick,
On Friday, June 18, 2004, 5:11:15 PM, you wrote:
N All seems very nice, but I used to have a rule for TB to remove
N messages marked as spam from the server. Is there some way that I can
N do this with BayesIt?
You can download the mail and delete it (not putting it into the
spam
Hello Nick,
Friday, June 18, 2004, 10:11:15 AM, you wrote:
ND I'm playing with BayesIt (0.5.5) having used Popfile happily for a few
ND years now.
ND All seems very nice, but I used to have a rule for TB to remove
ND messages marked as spam from the server. Is there some way that I can
ND do
Hello,
I'm playing with BayesIt (0.5.5) having used Popfile happily for a few
years now.
I change to POPFiel from weeks of frsutration with BayesIt slowing
down things, crashing the Bat etc.
May I ask why you are going the toher way - I am sopleased with
POPFile. It seems to prevent all
Popfile proxy.
Is there some way that I can do this with BayesIt?
RTT As far as I know this is not yet possible. That's something that I
RTT would like to have also :-)
It's not 'not yet possible', but it isn't possible at all. The more
intelligent spam filters check not only the headers
Saturday, June 19, 2004, 2:13:08 AM, you wrote:
aacu I change to POPFiel from weeks of frsutration with BayesIt slowing
aacu down things, crashing the Bat etc.
I'm using BayesIT, and have no problems with it. It's catching about
95% of the spam, which I hope will increase eventually, but even
Hello TBUDL,
I'm trying to get the latest BayesIt (0,5), according to the website it's part of the
latest TheBat distro but I havent been able to find it.
Can someone point me in the right direction
--
thanks,
Graham mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Wed, 9 Jun 2004 09:07:46 +0200 (3:07 AM EDT here) Graham Dodd wrote:
Hello TBUDL,
I'm trying to get the latest BayesIt (0,5), according to the website
it's part of the latest TheBat distro but I havent been able to find
it.
For what it's woorth, the path in my directory structure is:
C
It seems to work Great thanks !
Tuesday, June 8, 2004, 2:02:15 AM, tu m'a écris:
C:\Program Files\The Bat!\Mail\bayesit\base\spamdict.bye
Error loading file. May be it is corrupted or lost.
S i once saw the same thing. then i used the following steps to recover
S and now log doesn't
Is there a way to reset the bayesit! plugin ? It always annoys me with this missing
files (see below)
Sunday, June 6, 2004, 8:23:05 PM, tu m'a écris:
MDP Dear Arnaud,
MDP @6-Jun-2004, 20:10 +0200 (06-Jun 19:10 UK time) Arnaud Lecat [AL] in
MDP mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
AL I thought my
Dear Arnaud,
@7-Jun-2004, 20:19 +0200 (07-Jun 19:19 UK time) Arnaud Lecat [AL] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck:
AL Is there a way to reset the bayesit! plugin ? It always
AL annoys me with this missing files (see below)
I don't know - I don't use the plugins. Isn't there anything
Hello Arnaud,
On 7 Jun 2004 at 20:19:24 +0200 GMT [20:19 CEST] you wrote:
AL Is there a way to reset the bayesit! plugin ? It always annoys
AL me with this missing files (see below)
Delete the working directory and remove the plugin. Then add the plugin
again. It should install with default
C:\Program Files\The Bat!\Mail\bayesit\base\spamdict.bye
Error loading file. May be it is corrupted or lost.
i once saw the same thing. then i used the following steps to recover
and now log doesn't show any error:
1. delete all bayesit database files
2. since training feature is gone, i mark
Hey tbudl,
I've been using The Bat in the past on and off the last couple of
years to see when it would get respectable IMAP supportand it
seems that has finally arrived with the 2.11 release.
So, now I've bought it to support the great software... :)
And now onto the questions:
BayesIt
Hello Max,
On 6 Jun 2004 at 12:49:42 +0200 GMT [12:49 CEST] you wrote:
MRA BayesIt and Junk mails:
MRA I can see that BayesIt has loaded it's files etc. in the Information
MRA page of the plugin, but it has not filtered any messages yet - all
MRA stats (except the stuff about the base) is all
Hej Andre,
Sunday, June 6, 2004, 1:36:41 PM, skrev du:
AW Hello Max,
AW On 6 Jun 2004 at 12:49:42 +0200 GMT [12:49 CEST] you wrote:
MRA BayesIt and Junk mails:
MRA I can see that BayesIt has loaded it's files etc. in the Information
MRA page of the plugin, but it has not filtered any messages
... :)
Welcome aboard though I must admit that IMAP still has some problems,
one that you've detected below.
MRA And now onto the questions:
MRA BayesIt and Junk mails:
MRA I can see that BayesIt has loaded it's files etc. in the Information
MRA page of the plugin, but it has not filtered any messages yet
- not very asuring ;( )
MRA And now onto the questions:
MRA BayesIt and Junk mails:
MRA I can see that BayesIt has loaded it's files etc. in the Information
MRA page of the plugin, but it has not filtered any messages yet - all
MRA stats (except the stuff about the base) is all zero's !?
MRA
Hello TBUDL,
Since I'm getting inundated with spam I decided to try the recommended
plug-in. I have met a configuration problem. I'm using The Bat! 2.11.2
with BayesIt 0.5.5. I am on dial-up so I do not download larger
messages , preferring to leave on the server for later action using
Mail
Hello Ian,
On 6 Jun 2004 at 15:30:39 +0100 GMT [16:30 CEST] you wrote:
IP So. I am trying to configure BayesIt to leave the messages
IP it regards as spam in the inbox but merely mark them read. There is
IP a check box to do this (on The Bat! preferences anti-spam leaf) but ,
IP although
Hello Allie,
On 6 Jun 2004 at 07:25:29 -0500 GMT [14:25 CEST] you wrote:
AM Are you using BayesIt with an IMAP account? I don't know if it will
AM work with IMAP accounts.
I always thought that the plugins don't care for the protocoll and will
work with imap and pop. The old homepage
Andre Wichartz, [AW] wrote:
AW I always thought that the plugins don't care for the protocoll and will
AW work with imap and pop. The old homepage for bayesit 0.4 said as much.
AW However, the site for v0.5 says that it doesn't work with imap so there
AW seems to have changed something.
I doubt
Hi
I thought my problems with Bayesit! would be over.
But once again in the plugin info i have these lines
C:\Program Files\The Bat!\Mail\bayesit\base\spamdict.bye
Error loading file. May be it is corrupted or lost.
spamdict.bye is here but it size is zero bytes :(
Hlp
--
El Sinior NoNo
Dear Arnaud,
@6-Jun-2004, 20:10 +0200 (06-Jun 19:10 UK time) Arnaud Lecat [AL] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
AL I thought my problems with Bayesit! would be over.
AL But once again in the plugin info i have these lines
AL C:\Program Files\The Bat!\Mail\bayesit\base\spamdict.bye
AL Error
Sunday, June 6, 2004, 8:23:05 PM, tu m'a écris:
MDP Wild shot in the dark time. What AV software do you use? Could your
MDP dictionary have been quarantined by it because of the presence of
MDP an infected message?
I'm using BitDefender... which is a quite good AV... i think !
--
El Sinior
make the current incarnation
workable for your needs.
The manage IMAP folders panel has been a source of many AV's. I
prepare for them when I'm going to work with it. :/
AM Are you using BayesIt with an IMAP account? I don't know if it will
AM work with IMAP accounts.
yes - of course i'm using
Hello Keith,
Friday, June 4, 2004, 10:44:51 PM, you wrote:
KR Now that I'm thinking of returning to TB for my IMAP account, can
KR anyone tell me whether or not BayesIT works with IMAP? (I
KR couldn't figure out a way to search this question, since so many
KR users have the word BayesIT
Hello Keith,
On 5 Jun 2004 at 23:44:51 -0600 GMT [07:44 CEST] you wrote:
KR Now that I'm thinking of returning to TB for my IMAP account, can
KR anyone tell me whether or not BayesIT works with IMAP? (I
KR couldn't figure out a way to search this question, since so many
KR users have the word
Hello Arnaud,
On 2 Jun 2004 at 19:32:30 +0200 GMT [19:32 CEST] you wrote:
AL Yop,
AL I've found the problem ! When i go in Options menu and then plugin, i
AL can find information about Bayesit! And here is what it tells me :
AL ° C:\Program Files\The Bat!\MAIL\bayesit\base\spamdict.bye
AL
Yop,
I've found the problem ! When i go in Options menu and then plugin, i
can find information about Bayesit! And here is what it tells me :
° C:\Program Files\The Bat!\MAIL\bayesit\base\spamdict.bye
° Error loading file. May be it is corrupted or lost.
How come this file doesn't exist ?
AW
Hello Arnaud,
On 1 Jun 2004 at 13:33:06 +0200 GMT [13:33 CEST] you wrote:
AL Hi
AL I'm testing the Bat! and what a great program !
AL I'm trying to use Bayesit filter... but it doesn't seem to work very
AL well. I'l tagging as junk every Spam I receive but until now spam are
AL always incoming
sure like to know what I am doing, however.
Thanks in advance! /Daniel
--
Kindest Regards,
Daniel Nelson
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat! v2.10.03 Corporate [BayesIt! 0.5.4] on Windows XP 5.1
Build 2600 Service Pack 1 - Antivirus scanned by NOD32 Enterprise.
-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK
Hi TBUDLler,
I don't think this is correct, but I can't get it corrected either...
When starting BT v2.10.01 everytime I get the noted error in a small
dialog behind the splash screen; clicking OK continues the startup,
and it seems TB is doing it's job nicely after.
If ...\mail\BayesIt does
Hi Cory,
On Thu, 06 May 2004, at 11:07:32 [GMT+0200] (which was 19:07:32 Australian
Eastern Time) you wrote:
Anyone knows what I should do to correct / prevent this error?
Upgrade to 2.10.03 might fix?
--
John Phillips, Sydney, Australia
Using The Bat! v2.10.03 on Windows XP 5.1 Build
Hello Cory,
On Thu, 06 May 2004 11:07:32 +0200 GMT (06/05/2004, 16:07 +0700 GMT),
Cory wrote:
C If ...\mail\BayesIt does not exists (eg. I rename or remove the
C folder), TB creates this folder by itself - and at nest start,
C complains about the existing folder again...
C This filtering has
http://www.ritlabs.com/kb/idx/0/064/article/
first, make sure you download 0.5.3 from above address.
with 0.5.x, i had the same problem you have now (it filters every email as junk). what
i did is to
select all good mails i have in inbox and mark as not junk. then it seems working
properly.
As BayesIT! is now bundled with TheBat!, I assume it is OK to ask
about it on this list.
I was having great success with the 0.45gm (or whatever version) of
BayesIT. But with the latest version of TheBat!, I see BayesIT is up
to 0.5 and it's success has severely dropped off.
It seems to classify
Hello all,
Thursday, April 29, 2004, Alex Ezell wrote:
As BayesIT! is now bundled with TheBat!, I assume it is OK to ask
about it on this list.
I was having great success with the 0.45gm (or whatever version) of
BayesIT. But with the latest version of TheBat!, I see BayesIT is up
to 0.5
On Thursday, April 29, 2004, 11:32:34 AM, Marek wrote:
as I know, some changes in databases structure was made in 0.5 version
and developer recommended to create database from zero.
Thanks. I have just done this. We will see how it works. Luckily, I
have saved several thousand good and bad
On Thursday, April 29, 2004, 11:52:09 AM, Samson wrote:
http://www.ritlabs.com/kb/idx/0/064/article/
first, make sure you download 0.5.3 from above address.
A combination of updating as you suggest and renewing the databases as
Marek suggested seems to have solved the problem.
Thanks!
--
Could someone post an example of the correct syntax to use to add
something to the whitelist of the BayesIt plugin?
For example, if I wanted to be sure anything from @abc123.org didn't
get mistaken for spam how would I enter that into the whitelist?
Thanks.
--
ò¸ó Nick
Danger
[MUA: 2.10.01
Please post the url for the new (5.3 ?0 version of bayesit. The link
in the knowledge base is http://klirik.narod.ru/usefuls/bayesiteng.htm
which is to version 4. The Russian tabs on that page are no help to
me.
BWs Gordon N.
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Hello all,
Wednesday, April 21, 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please post the url for the new (5.3 ?0 version of bayesit. The link
in the knowledge base is
http://klirik.narod.ru/usefuls/bayesiteng.htm
which is to version 4. The Russian tabs on that page are no help to
me.
here it is:
http
On Wed, 21 Apr 2004 11:15:29 +1000, Ian A. White wrote:
Stranger still. This message was picked up as spam, but your other
reply was not.
Now one thing common to both messages is the word SpamPal in
unquoted text so I am wondering if when this message gets to the
list it is gets flagged as
I was one who had problems with the the BayesIt v0.5 plugin marking
all mail as spam, so eventually went back to v0.4. I have since
installed v0.5.3, and initially it was doing fine - 85% or the first
couple of days. All of a sudden it's now marking only 30%, and missing
some from vendors
want to try WinRAR (http://www.rarlab.com/)
- they have a trial version that might do the job.
--
Regards
Johnny Skaaning
_
Using The Bat! 2.10.01 on Windows XP Service Pack 1
and BayesIt! 0.5.3
Current version is 2.10.01
On Tuesday, April 20, 2004 at 9:59:18 AM, you wrote:
Dear Marten,
MG OK - so I download that (three times) and it won't unzip.
Did the same an hour ago, no problem. It's a rar archive. Don't know
what you're using. In my case Total Commander did the job. Unless
you're really experiencing
401 - 500 of 631 matches
Mail list logo
