Hello. I use TB with quite a lot of folders that incoming mail is
automatically sorted to on arrival. If a message requires further
action from me I usually use the little red flag to flag it for
attention. What I am wondering is this - is there a way to make a
folder show that there is a flagged
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Peter Ballantyne, [PB] wrote:
PB I use TB with quite a lot of folders that incoming mail is
PB automatically sorted to on arrival. If a message requires further
PB action from me I usually use the little red flag to flag it for
PB attention. What I
Hello Allie,
Monday, July 21, 2003, 11:28:15 PM, you wrote:
AM -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
AM Hash: SHA1
AM Peter Ballantyne, [PB] wrote:
PB I use TB with quite a lot of folders that incoming mail is
PB automatically sorted to on arrival. If a message requires further
PB action from me
On Mon 21-Jul-03 6:04am -0400, Peter Ballantyne wrote:
If a message requires further action from me I usually use the
little red flag to flag it for attention. What I am wondering is
this - is there a way to make a folder show that there is a flagged
message in it, perhaps by having the
Hello Bill,
Tuesday, July 22, 2003, 8:19:50 AM, you wrote:
BM On Mon 21-Jul-03 6:04am -0400, Peter Ballantyne wrote:
If a message requires further action from me I usually use the
little red flag to flag it for attention. What I am wondering is
this - is there a way to make a folder show
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Peter Ballantyne, [PB] wrote:
PB Oh, that's a shame. Never mind. Think I'll look at your suggestion
PB of using a special folder. For some the attention is other than
PB replying to the email, so I'll need to manually move them to the
PB right
Hello Allie,
Tuesday, July 22, 2003, 12:48:30 PM, you wrote:
AM On another note, please be mindful of excessive quotations in your
AM reply messages.
Opps. Sorry. Thanks for reminding me of that.
--
Kind regards,
Peter
Using The Bat! v1.62i on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600
Hello Peter,
I've got an idea: let's make it optional with users choice of what
being shown in folder indicator ... *SCNR* gdr :-)))
Of course! But on a folder basis ;-)
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.61
Hi Miguel,
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002 09:37:36 +0100
Miguel A. Urech [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've got an idea: let's make it optional with users choice of what
being shown in folder indicator ... *SCNR* gdr :-)))
Of course! But on a folder basis ;-)
No ... bad idea ... I'd suggest on 'per message
Hello Peter,
Do I sound sarcastic?
Just a bit more than I did :-)
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.61
Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information:
, or high priority messages, or messages belonging to
colour group N, or
Actually I'm quite serious. Your flip response is actually wrong, if
you stop and think about the reason for using these different
statuses.
Flagging is to identify a message for some reason, either because it
is important
Hi Simon,
Thursday, November 14, 2002, 9:49:15 AM, you wrote:
S Would anyone else find it useful to have the option of choosing from a
S selection of different coloured flags, instead of just the red one? What I
S mean is perhaps being able to cycle through coloured flags by clicking the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
'Lo list,
Would anyone else find it useful to have the option of choosing from a
selection of different coloured flags, instead of just the red one? What I
mean is perhaps being able to cycle through coloured flags by clicking the
flag
Simon,
On Thursday, November 14, 2002, Simon wrote in
mid:1547620781.20021114154915;theycallmesimon.co.uk:
Would anyone else find it useful to have the option of choosing from
a selection of different coloured flags, instead of just the red
one?
You can reserve the flag for a simple
the flagging is that I still instinctively look to the red
flag and consider it as a means of extended recognition, even though I am
aware that its use is limited by its simplicity. I think that extending the
scope of the flagging feature beyond its current simplicity would create
further
of the flagging feature beyond its
current simplicity would create further possibilities for message
sorting and identification. Even a simple 3 colour flag cycle would
be a significant enhancement as you would have 4 states instead of
2.
Yes, but it would require to change the structure.
--
Cheers
On Thursday, November 14, 2002, 9:49:15 AM, Simon wrote:
Would anyone else find it useful to have the option of
choosing from a selection of different coloured flags, instead of
just the red one? What I mean is perhaps being able to cycle
through coloured flags by clicking the flag
Hello Dwight,
this might be useful, but what would be more useful is if there was
some indication in the account tree that a folder contains flagged
messages.
Or if the folder contains Parked messages, or messages with
attachments, or high priority messages, or messages belonging to
colour
Hello Miguel,
On Friday, November 15, 2002 at 1:29:26 AM you wrote (at least in
part):
this might be useful, but what would be more useful is if there was
some indication in the account tree that a folder contains flagged
messages.
Or if the folder contains Parked messages, or messages with
DH Even if this is not TBBETA I sent another Me too. It was always
DH annoying me that I had to mark a message unread to see with one glance
DH which folder has important messages in it.
I raised this issue last week I think and agree entirely that it would
be useful. (I add this only in the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 10 Jun 2001 23:12:25 -0500, Dwight contributed this to our
collective wisdom:
...
DAC While checking my TBUDL mail just now, I noticed that I had flagged a
DAC message containing how to information because when I have some extra
DAC time I
Hi Allie,
On Mon, 11 Jun 2001 05:22:42 -0500GMT (11/06/2001, 18:22 +0800GMT),
A Curtis Martin wrote:
ACM The advanced filtering may help in this regard. You can set TB! to display
ACM only flagged messages.
Yes, I guess you could use that. A little thingy on the folder (like
the tickmark when
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 11 Jun 2001 18:40:17 +0800, Thomas graced us with these comments:
...
ACM Another tool is alt+left clicking on items in the message list.
TF This won't work. If you have a hundred folders, you you would have to
TF to click on each one of
Hi Allie,
On Mon, 11 Jun 2001 06:01:28 -0500GMT (11/06/2001, 19:01 +0800GMT),
A Curtis Martin wrote:
ACM How about parked messages then or ones you've specially colour labelled?
ACM If you forgot where the message is, this is where the search can also come
ACM in.
Yes, but: I just want to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 11 Jun 2001 19:10:49 +0800, Thomas thoughtfully wrote the
following:
...
ACM If you forgot where the message is, this is where the search can
ACM also come in.
TF Yes, but: I just want to have an in-the-face indicator of flagged
TF messages.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Thomas,
On Monday, June 11, 2001 12:29:01 [ +0800 GMT], you wrote the
following in regards to 'Flagging folders containing flagged
messages':
Thomas I use flags for another purpose, namely mails that
Thomas still need to be replied to, and I
On June 11, 2001, at 3:40:17 AM, Thomas F wrote:
ACM The advanced filtering may help in this regard. You can set TB! to
ACM display only flagged messages.
Yes, I guess you could use that. A little thingy on the folder (like
the tickmark when unread messages are in an account) would come in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On June 11, 2001, at 4:10:49 AM, Thomas F wrote:
Yes, but: I just want to have an in-the-face indicator of flagged
messages. That's all. ;-)
Yes.. Because there will be times when we forget we *have* to search for
flagged messages. A visual
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On June 11, 2001, at 5:03:07 AM, Jan Rifkinson wrote:
FWIW, I use a hot-key combination to move any email I want to answer
to an ANSWER THESE (my emphasis; not shouting) folder.
How do you assign that Jan? I don't see an option under Define
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Nick,
On Monday, June 11, 2001 06:13:47 [ -0700 GMT], you wrote the
following in regards to 'Flagging folders containing flagged
messages':
Nick How do you assign that Jan? I don't see an option under Define System Hot
Nick Keys to move
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Nick!
On Monday, June 11, 2001 at 3:07:04 PM you wrote:
I agree... A visual reminded on the Main Folder would be much appreciated.
Even if this is not TBBETA I sent another Me too. It was always
annoying me that I had to mark a message
to a designated Folder. Your suggestion might be a
viable alternative.
Not a viable alternative to flagging in general. Only helps if the
flagging is to mark messages which need response.
--
Dwight A. Corrin
P O Box 47828
Wichita KS 67201-7828
316.263.9706 fax 316.263.6385
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using
On June 10, 2001, at 9:12:25 PM, Dwight A Corrin wrote:
It would be very useful if folders containing a flagged message could be
flagged so that one could tell that it contained a flagged message, just
as one can tell when a folder contains an unread message.
Yes, I agree... That indeed
Hi Dwight,
On Sun, 10 Jun 2001 23:12:25 -0500GMT (11/06/2001, 12:12 +0800GMT),
Dwight A Corrin wrote:
DAC It would be very useful if folders containing a flagged message could
DAC be flagged so that one could tell that it contained a flagged message,
DAC just as one can tell when a folder
Dieter wrote:
And flagging is a decent way for elderly people to manage tons of
commercial mails which have to be queued prior to be processed g
Hey, thanks for the tip g
--
Stephen
--
--
View the TBUDL archive at http
On Sun, 7 May 2000 09:41:53 -0500, Allie Martin wrote:
Memo's are great. They stand out starkly if used judiciously. I use them
to help identify very important, specific messages which aren't evident
simply by the sender or the subject.
Just curious - these memos can be activated by filters ?
Hi Cristian,
On Mon, 08 May 2000 11:34:25 +0300GMT (08/05/2000, 16:34 +0800GMT),
Cristian Secara wrote:
Memo's are great. They stand out starkly if used judiciously. I use them
to help identify very important, specific messages which aren't evident
simply by the sender or the subject.
CS Just
Hello The Bat! users,
Cristian Secara wrote on 5/8/2000, 10:34 AM
CS Just curious - these memos can be activated by filters ?
CS For example, I wish any incoming mail from Allie to be automatically
CS flagged as red (or whatever).
CS Is this possible ?
Filters cannot (yet?) touch memos.
On Mon, 8 May 2000 16:57:32 +0800, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
"Memos" cannot be created via filters. I understand a "memo" is
soemthing very human, namely something that would help my memory to
remember what this message is about. that is associative, and the last
time I looked, computers still
Hallo Allie,
On Mon, 8 May 2000 07:16:35 -0500 GMT (08.05.2000, 20:16 +0800 GMT),
Allie Martin wrote:
AM It is /you/ who enter the memo and not TB!. I don't understand what you're
AM getting at.
That's what I am saying. Sorry I wasn't clear. See the question I
answered (previous in the
. If the flagging
element is already there, why not ?
Best wishes,
Cristi
--
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe
, ...) a message from a particular sender. If the flagging
CS element is already there, why not ?
Correct, and that works. Except that we have three new features:
1.) Memos
2.) Colours
3.) Flagging
I think you meant colours and flagging, while you said memos. Or it's
me who got this wrong, as Allie
define one color for "flagged" and then exercise some self
control. Meanwhile flagging is either on or off, nothing else, can be
replicated with color which others can use for more than just on and off. IE,
worthless.
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink
Hallo Steve,
On Sun, 7 May 2000 02:20:04 -0700 GMT (07.05.2000, 17:20 +0800 GMT),
Steve Lamb wrote:
SL You could define one color for "flagged" and then exercise some self
SL control. Meanwhile flagging is either on or off, nothing else,
Right, and it's one click with
Hi Steve Lamb,
On Sunday, May 07, 2000 at 5:36:28 AM you wrote:
The column can be hidden, yes. And it must be hidden on all new folders
twice. Not fun.
You are aware of that "Use the account default column settings"
checkbox, aren't you?
Oliver Sturm
--
% \(-
(-: Command not
On Sun, May 07, 2000 at 01:04:29PM +0200, Oliver Sturm wrote:
You are aware of that "Use the account default column settings"
checkbox, aren't you?
Yes. Unfortunately that doesn't work on custom folders nor on newly
created ones like in the folder view.
--
Steve C.
On Sun, 7 May 2000 18:56:33 +0800, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
SL You could define one color for "flagged" and then exercise some
SL self control. Meanwhile flagging is either on or off, nothing else,
Right, and it's one click with the mouse into the flag column on the
View Fold
Steve L. wrote:
Meanwhile flagging is either on or off, nothing else, can be
replicated with color which others can use for more than just on and
off. IE, worthless.
Except that it can be applied or removed by a single-click of mouse,
that is, it is a mousey toggle? Also that it works
,Morning Allie,
This is the only advantage of flagging, i.e., the speed of execution but
otherwise, I agree with Steve. It's pretty redundant with colour groups
and memos.
Theoretically, flags could be used as additional marker, as it's not
possible to assign unlimited groups, which would
On Sun, 7 May 2000 15:56:31 +0200, Jast wrote:
Alas, practically, there's already more power than I need in The Bat! I
don't think I'll even use memo's anytime soon.
Memo's are great. They stand out starkly if used judiciously. I use them
to help identify very important, specific messages
Morning Allie,
Memo's are great. They stand out starkly if used judiciously. I use them
to help identify very important, specific messages which aren't evident
simply by the sender or the subject. These messages can get easily lost
among other flagged messages. A prime example is a products
Hi Jast,
On Sun, 7 May 2000 15:56:31 +0200GMT (07/05/2000, 21:56 +0800GMT),
Jast wrote:
J Alas, practically, there's already more power than I need in The Bat! I
J don't think I'll even use memo's anytime soon.
Same here. But while flagging, colours, and memo have something to do
with email
Hi Douglas,
On 06 May 2000 at 18:36:53 GMT -0600 (which was 01:36 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of "Flagging?":
... I hope the color coding uses a five (rather than three) level
scheme, in order to more fully differentiate those
Hello fellow The Bat User Discussion List members,
In just a couple of minutes, I just Removed 493 Dupes in All
Folders. Now that's FFO.
Regarding \\arck's post Re: Flagging? (Which TB! lets me paste in as
a quote):
MP The new version implements four new message highlighting features:
MP 1
Hello The Bat! users,
Douglas Hinds wrote at 5/6/2000, 3:54 PM
MP 3) Memos- Memos can be added to messages
DH I don't see where to add them (not in "specials" or other part of
DH right click menu)
Shift+Ctrl+I (Memo autoview). Not nice enough, but works.
--
Cheers, SyP
The obvious
On Sat, 6 May 2000 07:54:34 -0600, Douglas Hinds wrote:
I don't see where to add them (not in "specials" or other part of
right click menu)
Select the message in question. Hit SHIFTCTRLI or go to View | Memo
auto-view. Type in the memo that appears and hit the save toolbar button.
Make sure
Hello Allie,
Saturday, May 06, 2000, 7:32:24 AM, you wrote:
AM On Sat, 6 May 2000 07:54:34 -0600, Douglas Hinds wrote:
Re Memos:
I don't see where to add them (not in "specials" or other part of
right click menu)
AM Select the message in question. Hit SHIFTCTRLI or go to
AM View | Memo
On Sat, 06 May 2000 12:38:11 -0600, Douglas Hinds wrote:
The memo column will be too wide to use up front unless I use codes, but
I could do that. Nothing on a second line is visible, but my code could
indicate the need to open the memo.
Right now, I have 7 columns of things before "From,
On Fri, May 05, 2000 at 06:36:53PM -0600, Douglas Hinds wrote:
Without flagging, the only way to imbue a message with a specific
importance was to either park it or to file it in another folder.
This was a problem? I parked them so they don't get nixed and so they
would be different than
. TB gives you a
chance to do much more than the average MUA. And flagging is a decent
way for elderly people to manage tons of commercial mails which have to
be queued prior to be processed g
Regards
Dieter
|Running TheBat! 1.42c [2E7F60DA] on
|Windows NT v4 Build 1381 Service Pack 6
Hello Steve and other fellow TB! users,
Saturday, May 06, 2000, 2:07:08 PM, you wrote:
SL This was a problem? I parked them so they don't get nixed and so
SL they would be different than the rest.
Right. I also made separate folders for flagged and unflagged
messages. I could select
On Sat, May 06, 2000 at 08:51:26PM -0600, Douglas Hinds wrote:
The flags are pretty and don't really bloat TB! - and the column can
be hidden. Although I agree, the colors do more and would have
sufficed.
The column can be hidden, yes. And it must be hidden on all new folders
twice. Not
Hallo Steve,
On Sat, 6 May 2000 13:07:08 -0700 GMT (07.05.2000, 04:07 +0800 GMT),
Steve Lamb wrote:
Without flagging, the only way to imbue a message with a specific
importance was to either park it or to file it in another folder.
SL This was a problem? I parked them so they don't get
Hi there,
What's that new flagging function for?
Thanks!
Oliver Sturm
--
Always proofread carefully in case you something out.
--
Oliver Sturm / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Key ID: 71D86996
Fingerprint: 8085 5C52 60B8 EFBD DAD0 78B8 CE7F 38D7 71D8 6996
Hello The Bat! users,
Oliver Sturm wrote at 5/5/2000, 8:30 PM
OS Hi there,
OS What's that new flagging function for?
It's for mark a message visually, perhaps because you want to deal
with it a later date...
Of course you could use parking instead (but then you can't delete the
message
Hi SyP,
On Friday, May 05, 2000 at 9:06:14 PM you wrote:
OS Hi there,
OS What's that new flagging function for?
It's for mark a message visually, perhaps because you want to deal
with it a later date...
Ah. I thought there was some sinister new functionality attached ;)
Oliver Sturm
In Reference to "Flagging?" From Jast:
What's that new flagging function for?
J Nothing specific. Use it creatively for your eMail management! You might
J flag messages that you want to reply to later for example.
I can think of quite a few handy uses if only I could filter o
Friday, May 05, 2000, 12:03:25 PM, Jast wrote:
BTW a even more versatile feature are the color groups (Options/message list
colors) Any 1.42 newcomer should try these!
Too bad there isn't a keyboard shortcut attached to these so one can just
mark messages without resorting to the moose.
Hello The Bat! users,
Steve Lamb wrote at 5/5/2000, 10:15 PM
SL Too bad there isn't a keyboard shortcut attached to these so one can just
SL mark messages without resorting to the moose.
What about Ctrl+G? :)
--
Cheers, SyP
With Microsoft products, failure is not an option - it's a
Friday, May 05, 2000, 1:29:44 PM, SyP wrote:
SL Too bad there isn't a keyboard shortcut attached to these so one can just
SL mark messages without resorting to the moose.
What about Ctrl+G? :)
What is CNTL-G, doesn't do anything here.
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your
On Fri, 5 May 2000 13:36:54 -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
What is CNTL-G, doesn't do anything here.
This flags messages. Go to the column settings and you'll see new entries.
One of them is flagging.
--
© 2000 Allie Martin /*\ Using TB! v1.42 Beta/21 on Win2k Pro
---
Urghm! - &quo
On Fri, 5 May 2000 13:15:29 -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
Too bad there isn't a keyboard shortcut attached to these so one can
just mark messages without resorting to the moose.
BTW, any reason you're using two spaces, not one, for quotes?
If the person to whom he's replying indented his
Hello The Bat! users,
SyP (I) wrote at 5/5/2000, 10:50 PM
S Ctrl+G toggles the state of the flag here... Maybe you assigned
S something other function to CTRL+G, either in TB! hot-keys or in
S Windows?
Stupid me, obviously you didn't put flagging into the column
entries...
--
Cheers, SyP
Ciao Jast,
venerdì, 5 maggio 2000, hai scritto:
J Morning Oliver,
What's that new flagging function for?
J Nothing specific.
but now we need a new `glyphs.bmp` file...
--
bye
Carol.
--
--
View the TBUDL archive at http
Friday, May 05, 2000, 3:34:00 PM, carolaina wrote:
What's that new flagging function for?
J Nothing specific.
but now we need a new `glyphs.bmp` file...
And to think, in another thread just a day or two ago people were trying
to tell me to trust RITLABS not to include anything
Hello carolaina,
On Saturday, May 06, 2000 you wrote:
What's that new flagging function for?
J Nothing specific.
but now we need a new `glyphs.bmp` file...
both current and classic glyphs, extracted from one of previous betas
are here: http://www.thebat.i.krakow.pl/filez/glyphs.zip
Ciao Christopher,
sabato, 6 maggio 2000, hai scritto:
CJT are you using alternative glyphs file now?
yes, the original changed in stronger colors for hi/low priority of
read mail and for male/female/none in contacts.
but the old glyphs.bmp I`ve found file doesn`t have `flag` icon.
--
bye,
Hi Steve,
On Fri, 5 May 2000 14:37:40 -0700GMT (06/05/2000, 05:37 +0800GMT),
Steve Lamb wrote:
This flags messages. Go to the column settings and you'll see new entries.
One of them is flagging.
SL Right, what does that have to do with me pointing out that colors doesn't
SL have
people
SL were trying to tell me to trust RITLABS not to include anything
SL that would bloat the product.
Without flagging, the only way to imbue a message with a specific
importance was to either park it or to file it in another folder. I
haven't yet installed (just downloaded) the final v
79 matches
Mail list logo
