Re: Multiple users, but one POP3 server

Hi Thomas, Thanks for explaining that, unfortunately Lotus Notes mail gives no option other than to 'top-post' - so my appologies to all who are offended by this. I do have the evaluation version of TB!, but am coming to the conclusion that it doesn't do exactly what I want, so I think I will sti

Re: Multiple users, but one POP3 server

Hello Raj, On Sat, 2 Nov 2002 08:05:50 +0530 GMT (02/11/02, 09:35 +0700 GMT), Raj wrote: > I am not sure why you even need to have filters. I have the same setup. I have > my domain and have setup multiple email id's for family members. He doesn't have different email boxes. He has ony one P

Re: Multiple users, but one POP3 server

Nigel, On Thu, 31 Oct 2002, at 14:52:49 [GMT +] (which was 8:22 PM where I live) you wrote: NSS> However, as all of our email comes from the same POP3 server, at the same NSS> time (no matter which user downloads it), it needs to be sorted into the NSS> repective Inboxes for each user. So my

Re: Multiple users, but one POP3 server

Hello Nigel, On Fri, 1 Nov 2002 15:56:26 + GMT (01/11/02, 22:56 +0700 GMT), Nigel S Smith wrote: > Yes i am considering using TB! - hence the original enquiry. As for > Turnpike, I'm not sure what 'Top-post' means. OK, I'll explain. When you look at the messages on this list, you will see th

Re: Multiple users, but one POP3 server

On Friday, November 1, 2002, 8:49 AM, you wrote: NSS> Hi Paul, NSS> I may have mis-understood your idea, but if I get all remaining mail, and NSS> have filters to sort it, I might as well just get everyone's in the first NSS> place - something I would have liked to avoid. NSS> Or have I missed s

Re: Multiple users, but one POP3 server

Hi Thomas, Yes i am considering using TB! - hence the original enquiry. As for Turnpike, I'm not sure what 'Top-post' means. If you're refering to the mails that I've sent to this list, then they aren't from Turnpike - I'm doing this from work, where we have to use Lotus Notes (yuk, yuk, yuk). Wh

Re: Multiple users, but one POP3 server

Hello Nigel, On Fri, 1 Nov 2002 11:11:18 + GMT (01/11/02, 18:11 +0700 GMT), Nigel S Smith wrote: > The only fly in the ointment with this method is that mail being sent to an > unkonwn user e.g. [EMAIL PROTECTED], would never be collected, > whereas, at the moment unrecognised user names are

Re: Multiple users, but one POP3 server

Hi Paul, I may have mis-understood your idea, but if I get all remaining mail, and have filters to sort it, I might as well just get everyone's in the first place - something I would have liked to avoid. Or have I missed something? Thanks, Nigel. Paul Cartwright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@thebat.du

Re: Multiple users, but one POP3 server

On Friday, November 1, 2002, 6:11 AM, you wrote: ound - so the username would be "nigel+webbit", etc. NSS> The only fly in the ointment with this method is that mail being sent to an NSS> unkonwn user e.g. [EMAIL PROTECTED], would never be collected, NSS> whereas, at the moment unrecognised user

Re[4]: Multiple users, but one POP3 server

NSS> The only fly in the ointment with this method is that mail being sent to an NSS> unkonwn user e.g. [EMAIL PROTECTED], would never be collected, NSS> whereas, at the moment unrecognised user names are sent to my account by NSS> default (I'm currently using Turnpike which handles this). Do you

Re: Re[2]: Multiple users, but one POP3 server

Shaun, Thanks for this bit of lateral thinking - I hadn't realised that you could sort mail in this way at the server - it does make sense for it to be done at the Demon end. For info, your guess at the way to do it is nearly right., just the other way round - so the username would be "nigel+webbi

Re: Multiple users, but one POP3 server

Hello Miguel, On Thu, 31 Oct 2002 16:57:36 +0100 GMT (31/10/02, 22:57 +0700 GMT), Miguel A. Urech wrote: >> However, as all of our email comes from the same POP3 server, at the same >> time (no matter which user downloads it), it needs to be sorted into the >> repective Inboxes for each user. So

Re: Multiple users, but one POP3 server

Hello Nigel, > However, as all of our email comes from the same POP3 server, at the same > time (no matter which user downloads it), it needs to be sorted into the > repective Inboxes for each user. So my question is - what's the best way of > doing this? Is it by using filters, and if so, is anyo

Re[2]: Multiple users, but one POP3 server

>> However, as all of our email comes from the same POP3 server, at the same >> time (no matter which user downloads it), it needs to be sorted into the >> repective Inboxes for each user. Demon will let you specify a user name in the pop3 authentication so that it will only download that user's

Re: Multiple users, but one POP3 server

On Thursday, October 31, 2002, Nigel S Smith wrote in : > However, as all of our email comes from the same POP3 server, at the same > time (no matter which user downloads it), it needs to be sorted into the > repective Inboxes for each

Multiple users, but one POP3 server

Hello all, Hope you can help. I have the trial version of TB! and am trying it out, hoping that it will meet my needs. If so I'll register it. So far so good, but I have one issue that I am struggling with: All 4 members of my family use the PC, and all have email accounts with the same domain na