-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
on Tuesday, February 13, 2001 16:19:27, our bat friend Nick Andriash typed:
NA Krister, can you redo that line, but this time put a hard
NA return at the end of "address:", as you see it above? That should be all
NA that is necessary for both
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Krister!
On Wednesday, February 14, 2001 at 4:52:01 PM you wrote:
Try verifying this msg both with tray and plugin and see if this
makes any difference.
Works both ways:
*** PGP Signature Status: good
*** Signer: Krister Ekstrom [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On February 15, 2001, at 7:52:01 AM, Krister Ekstrom Wrote:
KE Let me see if i understand this correctly, I should press the return
KE key at the end of "address" rather than let the program do the return
KE function, right? Try verifying this msg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
Below follows Nicks msg accompanied by the stupid one of the week...
on Monday, February 12, 2001 16:56:42, our bat friend Nick Andriash typed:
NA have your Key on my Public Key Ring. BTW Krister, all of your PGP
NA signatures are failing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
I just thought of something, i've got two keys, one Rsa and one Dss/Dh
key pair. I tend to sign my messages with the Dss/Dh key pair, what
type of key(s) are you using, Nick? and does it all make any sence?
- --
/Krister
email: [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Krister!
On Tuesday, February 13, 2001 at 11:05:55 AM you wrote:
NA have your Key on my Public Key Ring. BTW Krister, all of your PGP
NA signatures are failing verification:
Oh no, what have i done now?:)
Just for the record: Tried
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
on Tuesday, February 13, 2001 03:18:43, our bat friend Nick Andriash typed:
NA Mike, do you have both versions of PGP installed somehow, or are you
NA experimenting with 2 boxes?
Or could it be that as long as my key isn't signed by you, pgp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Krister!
On Tuesday, February 13, 2001 at 11:12:16 AM you wrote:
I just thought of something, i've got two keys, one Rsa and one Dss/Dh
key pair. I tend to sign my messages with the Dss/Dh key pair, what
type of key(s) are you using,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
So now what? Should i stop signing my mails for now, or what should i
do? Is it a bug in the pgp dll of the bat!? I use the 6.5.8 ckt build,
but does this make sence?
Everyone who requests my key gets put in a special address book group
called
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Krister!
On Tuesday, February 13, 2001 at 11:27:07 AM you wrote:
cut
Follow-up to my other post: Checked sig of my own message in Outbox,
came out good on both ways.
- --
Dierk Haasis
PGP keys available: mailto:[EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Krister!
On Tuesday, February 13, 2001 at 11:27:07 AM you wrote:
So now what? Should i stop signing my mails for now, or what should i
do?
No, sign on.
Is it a bug in the pgp dll of the bat!? I use the 6.5.8 ckt build,
but does this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On February 13, 2001, at 2:28:55 AM, Dierk Haasis Wrote:
DH BTW, how come PGP gives out the correct holder of the signature but
DH says "bad". A tampered signature shouldn't be verifiable at all?!
Well, technically the signature hasn't been
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On February 13, 2001, at 2:30:14 AM, Krister Ekstrom Wrote:
KE Or could it be that as long as my key isn't signed by you, pgp reports
KE my signature as "bad"?
Krister, PGPTray reports the signature as "Bad" because the actual
clear-text... text
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Mike Yetto !
On Mon, 12 Feb 2001 22:51:04 -0500 GMT your local time,
which was 13.02.2001, 04:51 (GMT+0100) where I live, you wrote:
[...]
Ah ha! I saved Krister's message as a text file and it verified as
'good' with PGPTray.
Confirmed!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Krister Ekstrom !
On Tue, 13 Feb 2001 11:27:07 +0100 GMT your local time,
which was 13.02.2001, 11:27 (GMT+0100) where I live, you wrote:
So now what? Should i stop signing my mails for now, or what should i
do?
No, keep on using PGP.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Bat! people!
Well i've experimented a bit with the filter and now it seems to
trigger again, so if anyone who previously have tried to get my pgp
keys want to, they can now try again, and it *should* work this time,
i think...
- --
/Krister
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On February 12, 2001, at 2:10:11 AM, Krister Ekstrom Wrote:
KE Well i've experimented a bit with the filter and now it seems to
KE trigger again, so if anyone who previously have tried to get my pgp
KE keys want to, they can now try again, and it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Nick!
On Monday, February 12, 2001 at 4:56:42 PM you wrote:
Ok, I've just sent a request in to see if it works, although I already
have your Key on my Public Key Ring. BTW Krister, all of your PGP
signatures are failing verification:
I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On February 12, 2001, at 8:42:40 AM, Dierk Haasis Wrote:
DH I can't confirm that. when Krister posted his (signed) message
DH regarding his working filters I checked if I already had his keys by
DH just verifying his signature - and it came out
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Nick!
On Monday, February 12, 2001 at 5:49:13 PM you wrote:
using Key ID: 0x8313390B. Does he have a newer Key or something? If I show
his signature as bad, you should also. shrug.
Same key ID, works good. It is his DH/DSS key. I also
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On February 12, 2001, at 9:37:08 AM, Dierk Haasis Wrote:
DH Same key ID, works good. It is his DH/DSS key. I also own his RSA
DH key. His DH/DSS si created on 19/04/98, does not expire and uses
DH CAST. Complete ID (64b): 0x3839497A8313390B.
So
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Nick Andriash !
On Mon, 12 Feb 2001 09:36:35 -0800 GMT your local time,
which was 12.02.2001, 18:36 (GMT+0100) where I live, you wrote:
[...]
So you are saying that you checked his message and the signature verified
as "Good"? If so, then
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On February 12, 2001, at 10:19:28 AM, Gerd Ewald Wrote:
GE Nick, the funny thing is that I get a GOOD signature when I use
GE TB-plugin and a BAD when I use PGPTray. The key was downloaded by PGP;
GE ID: 0x8313390B Fingerprint:D554 FB2E 50A7 AB9B
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On February 12, 2001, at 11:49:04 AM, Nick Andriash Wrote:
NA Well isn't that strange. Yes, I confirm that the Key Fingerprint you
NA sent is the same as the one on my Key Ring. Well, I will have to
NA report that to NAI, because that is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, at 09:36:35 [GMT -0800], Nick Andriash wrote:
NA So you are saying that you checked his message and the signature verified
NA as "Good"? If so, then I don't understand why it shows "Bad" on my
NA machine, and can think no reason
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, at 19:19:28 [GMT +0100], Gerd Ewald wrote:
GE Nick, the funny thing is that I get a GOOD signature when I use TB-plugin
GE and a BAD when I use PGPTray. The key was downloaded by PGP; ID: 0x8313390B
GE Fingerprint:D554 FB2E 50A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On February 12, 2001, at 3:31:01 PM, Mike Yetto Wrote:
GE Nick, the funny thing is that I get a GOOD signature when I use TB-plugin
GE and a BAD when I use PGPTray. The key was downloaded by PGP; ID: 0x8313390B
GE Fingerprint:D554 FB2E 50A7 AB9B
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, at 18:18:43 [GMT -0800], Nick Andriash wrote:
NA Ok, now we have to figure out why you are getting differing results with
NA PGPTray, and why just Krister's messages. There has to be a common
NA denominator there somewhere.
NA
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, at 18:18:43 [GMT -0800], Nick Andriash wrote:
NA Ok, now we have to figure out why you are getting differing results with
NA PGPTray, and why just Krister's messages. There has to be a common
NA denominator there somewhere.
Ah
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On February 12, 2001, at 7:51:04 PM, Mike Yetto Wrote:
MY Ah ha! I saved Krister's message as a text file and it verified as
MY 'good' with PGPTray. I think the problem is with this line.
Good find Mike!
MY I'd be hard-pressed to say that either
30 matches
Mail list logo
