Re: Addressbook problems with The Bat! v3.95.06

Hallo Nav, On Wed, 7 Feb 2007 03:47:57 +0200GMT (7-2-2007, 2:47 +0100, where I live), you wrote: > The problem is everything was working fine with earlier version. I was > able to add sender from multiple messages at once to addressbook > group/groups. Now it isn't possible I know. As I said I'v

Mod: Top posting (was: Addressbook problems with The Bat! v3.95.06)

Hallo SD, On Wed, 7 Feb 2007 03:47:57 +0200GMT (7-2-2007, 2:47, where I live), you wrote: > I tried repair, reinstall TheBat!, but no success. > On 2/7/07, Roelof Otten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hallo SD, Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not just to the p

Re: Addressbook problems with The Bat! v3.95.06

The problem is everything was working fine with earlier version. I was able to add sender from multiple messages at once to addressbook group/groups. Now it isn't possible After my addressbook got missing, it just doesn't load any addresses when I try to load/import the ABD file. I tried repair,

Re: Addressbook problems with The Bat! v3.95.06

Hallo SD, On Tue, 6 Feb 2007 15:39:03 +0200GMT (6-2-2007, 14:39 +0100, where I live), you wrote: N> if I select couple of messages and do "add sender to address book" and N> specifiy contact group to be added, only the first message sender is N> added and rest ignored. I've heard that before. N

Addressbook problems with The Bat! v3.95.06

Hi, After installing the latest version of TheBat (v3.95.06), I am facing some problems. (1) if I select couple of messages and do "add sender to address book" and specifiy contact group to be added, only the first message sender is added and rest ignored. (2) Somewhat worsed! As above didn't

Addressbook problems with The Bat! v3.95.06

Hi, After installing the latest version of TheBat (v3.95.06), I am facing some problems. (1) if I select couple of messages and do "add sender to address book" and specifiy contact group to be added, only the first message sender is added and rest ignored. (2) Somewhat worsed! As above didn't

Re[2]: Problems with The Bat

Howdy, Thanks Roelof, that fixed the problem perfectly :) Cheers, Scott Current version is 2.02.3 CE | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Problems with The Bat

Hello Scott, On Fri, 30 Jan 2004 09:38:54 +1030 GMT (30/01/2004, 06:08 +0700 GMT), Scott Sims wrote: > Have a look at this screengrab: > http://www.freewebs.com/aceblue/connection.jpg The screenshot shows that you browser is the active window, not TB. The connection center should show when you c

Re: Problems with The Bat

Hallo Scott, On Fri, 30 Jan 2004 15:43:14 +1030GMT (30-1-04, 6:13 +0100, where I live), you wrote: SS> Nope, My setting is set to "Automatically". In that case it's possible that it has been moved from the visible screen. Close TB Start Regedit Search for the following keys in your registry: HKe

Re[2]: Problems with The Bat

Nope, My setting is set to "Automatically". If I select "Hide" it disappears. I then set it back to automatically and it still doesn't show up. It shows up on the taskbar but not the actual dialog box. (As per the image in my previous post http://www.freewebs.com/aceblue/connection.jpg) Cheers Scot

Re: Problems with The Bat

Hallo Scott, On Fri, 30 Jan 2004 09:38:54 +1030GMT (30-1-04, 0:08 +0100, where I live), you wrote: SS> What happens is the connection centre box won't open on my computer. SS> When it is loading email and in on the task bar, clicking it doesn't make it show up. Maybe this helps: Options -> Pr

Problems with The Bat

Howdy, I cannot seem to fix this problem... What happens is the connection centre box won't open on my computer. When it is loading email and in on the task bar, clicking it doesn't make it show up. If I do a fresh install of the Bat and don't restore my email, it shows up. As soon as I restore m

Re: Problems with The Bat

Hello Scott Sims, on Fri, 30 Jan 2004 09:32:53 +1030 (2004-01-30 00:02:53 in .nl) in the message with reference you [SS] wrote (at least in part): SS> It's very annoying, as I can't see what is happening when large emails are downloading. SS> I don't have any plugins inst

Problems with The Bat

Howdy, I cannot seem to fix this problem... What happens is the connection centre box won't open on my computer. When it is loading email and in on the task bar, clicking it doesn't make it show up. If I do a fresh install of the Bat and don't restore my email, it shows up. As soon as I restore m

Re: problems with the bat networked

Good evening List Members, On Sun, 22 Dec 2002 at 08:05:50 [GMT +0100] Steve wrote: > moves along quite nicely for a period of time (indiscriminate amout of > time), then hangs on the server, then on the client machines. There is > nothing in the error logs on the server or any of the client mach

Re: problems with the bat networked

Steve- No problems here running TB in networked mode on Win2k server. Granted, I'm using a slightly different version, but other than that I don't think your problems stem from that combination. -Mark Wieder Using The Bat! v1.61 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 -- __

problems with the bat networked

Hi Guys, I am running the bat version 1.62 on a windows 2000 network with the bat being hosted on Windows 2000 Server. I have been using the bat for over 3 years now in network mode without any major dramas up until moving the bat across to its new host (Windows 2000 Server SP2). All machines on th

Re: Mozilla and Netscape 7 format flowed messge format causing problems with The Bat! 1.60Q

Hi Mark, On Wednesday, June 12, 2002 at 22:03:00 [GMT -0400], you wrote: MK> I have been receiving e-mails from users using Mozilla 1.0.0+ and MK> Netscape 7 PR1 using the default message format flowed settings. MK> This is causing The Bat! 1.60Q to lock up and at times cause MK> database file co

Re: Mozilla and Netscape 7 format flowed messge format causing problems with The Bat! 1.60Q

On Tuesday, June 11, 2002, 10:03:00 PM, Mark Knipfer wrote: MK> I have been receiving e-mails from users using Mozilla 1.0.0+ and MK> Netscape 7 PR1 using the default message format flowed settings. MK> This is causing The Bat! 1.60Q to lock up and at times cause MK> database file corruptions whe

Mozilla and Netscape 7 format flowed messge format causing problems with The Bat! 1.60Q

I have been receiving e-mails from users using Mozilla 1.0.0+ and Netscape 7 PR1 using the default message format flowed settings. This is causing The Bat! 1.60Q to lock up and at times cause database file corruptions where I cannot recover messages in the mail folder where the message got receiv

Re: SMTP authentication problems with The Bat!

Hello Stuart, On Thursday, February 14, 2002 at 10:27:44 PM you wrote in msgid:5.1.0.14.2.20020214162639.02279c50@pop (at least in part): SB> Uhhh ... yup that won't cut the mustard ... now to find out how I can log SB> transfers out the net connection (I'm on a cable modem). You can give htt

Re: SMTP authentication problems with The Bat!

Hello Chris Hall, On Thursday, February 14 2002 at 05:40 PM PDT, you wrote: > In ADR go to:- | Help | Configuring | Mail Clients | Setting of the Bat. > > This may give you a clue. Thanks Chris... My problem turned out to be something as simple as not checking a box under 'Actions' so that my

Re[2]: SMTP authentication problems with The Bat!

Friday, 15 February 2002 Hi Nick, On Thu, 14 Feb 2002, at 15:47:47 [GMT -0800] (which was 12:47 p.m. here in Eastbourne, N.Z.) you wrote: NA> What do you have to do for it to work? It just sits there in my System NA> Tray, and I cannot figure out what it needs to act as a local SMTP NA> Server.

Re: SMTP authentication problems with The Bat!

At 14:54 2/14/02, you wrote: >On 14 February 2002 at 18:08 Stuart wrote: > > > And can you tell me how I would get that for The Bat! ? The "Log" doesn't > > contain that much info. This was extracted from Eudora.log with the > > appropriate debug selections made in the ini file. > >Bizarrely, yo

Re[3]: SMTP authentication problems with The Bat!

Hello Chris, Thursday, February 14, 2002, 6:27:50 PM, you wrote: MR>> I have now gone beyond them - using instead a "local" SMTP server - MR>> ADR (Advanced Direct Remailer). CH> I too have had problems with variable SMTP domains and I saw your CH> posting about ADR and I am now testing it out

Re: SMTP authentication problems with The Bat!

Hello Melissa Reese, On Thursday, February 14 2002 at 03:55 PM PDT, you wrote: > While there are other small configuration settings you can set up, the > one *very simple* thing you need to do to get it working is to type > "localhost" (no quotes) in your email client's "SMTP server" field for >

Re: SMTP authentication problems with The Bat!

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday, February 14, 2002, at 3:47:47 PM PST, Nick Andriash wrote: > What do you have to do for it to work? It just sits there in my > System Tray, and I cannot figure out what it needs to act as a local > SMTP Server. I don't see a manual with

Re: SMTP authentication problems with The Bat!

Hello Chris Hall, On Thursday, February 14 2002 at 03:27 PM PDT, you wrote: > I too have had problems with variable SMTP domains and I saw your > posting about ADR and I am now testing it out and so far ..It Rocks.. What do you have to do for it to work? It just sits there in my System Tray, an

Re[2]: SMTP authentication problems with The Bat!

Friday, 15 February 2002 Hi Melissa, On Thu, 14 Feb 2002, at 09:53:14 [GMT -0800] (which was 6:53 a.m. here in Eastbourne, N.Z.) you wrote: MR> I have now gone beyond them - using instead a "local" SMTP server - MR> ADR (Advanced Direct Remailer). I too have had problems with variable SMTP dom

Re: SMTP authentication problems with The Bat!

At 17:17 2/14/02, you wrote: >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >Hash: SHA1 > >On Thursday, February 14, 2002, at 1:26:30 PM PST, Stuart Brook wrote: > > > That won't work, because it isn't ... I retrieve mail from one ISP > > and send mail through another. > >Well, you could enable "Use specific

Re: SMTP authentication problems with The Bat!

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday, February 14, 2002, at 1:26:30 PM PST, Stuart Brook wrote: > That won't work, because it isn't ... I retrieve mail from one ISP > and send mail through another. Well, you could enable "Use specific settings", and type in the "mail retrie

Re: SMTP authentication problems with The Bat!

At 13:59 2/14/02, you wrote: >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >Hash: SHA1 > >On Thursday, February 14, 2002, at 10:08:52 AM PST, Stuart Brook wrote: > > > Now I tried it as no MD-5 and got the same result ... but I recall > > some other settings that might impact that. > >Hello Stuart, > >Why d

Re: SMTP authentication problems with The Bat!

On 14 February 2002 at 18:08 Stuart wrote: > And can you tell me how I would get that for The Bat! ? The "Log" doesn't > contain that much info. This was extracted from Eudora.log with the > appropriate debug selections made in the ini file. Bizarrely, you can't. One of my feature requests i

Re: SMTP authentication problems with The Bat!

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday, February 14, 2002, at 10:08:52 AM PST, Stuart Brook wrote: > Now I tried it as no MD-5 and got the same result ... but I recall > some other settings that might impact that. Hello Stuart, Why don't you try it with the following setting

Re: SMTP authentication problems with The Bat!

Thank you Peter ... It is a good thing I >< before posting in a relatively public place :-) I didn't think to look at Base64 encoding. Now I tried it as no MD-5 and got the same result ... but I recall some other settings that might impact that. >SB> Rcvd: "250-AUTH LOGIN PLAIN\r\n" >Seems t

Re: SMTP authentication problems with The Bat!

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday, February 14, 2002, at 9:27:55 AM PST, Stuart Brook wrote: > Now, I've assumed this to be a CRAM MD-5 authentication. Pegasus and > Poco both seem to work OK in doing the authentication, but I cannot > get The Bat! to authenticate. > I g

Re: SMTP authentication problems with The Bat!

Hello Stuart, On Thursday, February 14, 2002 at 6:27:55 PM you wrote in msgid:5.1.0.14.2.20020214121359.009fa530@pop (at least in part): SB> My ISP, rogers.com, when they took over from @home, implemented an SMTP SB> authenticated server, which even their tech support people don't know what SB>

SMTP authentication problems with The Bat!

I've been looking for a replacement mail client for Eudora, which seems to have an intense dislike for nested multipart messages. The Bat! and several others support this well ... but either they are full of security holes like LookOut or LookOut Fast, or cumbersome like Netscape and Pegasus,

Re[2]: Problems with The Bat! 152f

Peter, Tuesday, May 08, 2001, 1:40:29 PM, you wrote: PP> *hmmm* ~4700 messages over here ... Purge & Compress are usually done PP> on exit :-) ... but not slower than before 1.52f ... maybe your TB! is PP> sad it's only 400 messages to handle? *grin* I'm still at 1.52c, and usually keep TB! run

Re: Problems with The Bat! 152f

Hello John, On Tuesday, May 08, 2001 at 1:13:38 PM you wrote: JS> Hello TBUDL, JS> First of all TB seems not to be logging connections anymore. I have JS> no new entries since I was useing 1.51. not confirmed over here ... 08.05.2001, 13:18:29: FETCH - received message from [EMAIL PROTEC

Problems with The Bat! 152f

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello TBUDL, First of all TB seems not to be logging connections anymore. I have no new entries since I was useing 1.51. Also changing between groups in the address book hangs for about 5 seconds, aside from loseing all my entries and templat

Re: Multiple problems with "the bat"

On Fri, 24 Dec 1999 14:10:51 +0800, Thomas Fernandez wrote: [reasons for not using folder view snipped...] > so basically: a matter of taste. Yes, it is. I used to find the folder view awkward but now that I've gotten used to it and I can't go back to the preview window. That sense of relie

Re[2]: Multiple problems with "the bat"

Hi Ali, on Friday, December 24, 1999, 6:48:25 AM GMT+0800, Ali Martin wrote: AM> I have a setup identical to Steve's and do prefer not using the AM> preview window for a couple reasons he sited, namely that it reduces AM> having to scroll through the message list since more of it is visible. OK

Re: Multiple problems with "the bat"

On Thu, 23 Dec 1999 13:01:06 -0800, Steve Lamb wrote: [] > I don't use them in general. I find that the space that it takes up on > the display causes problems with me elsewhere as everything doesn't line up > quite right. Currently with TB! I have the folder view to the left go all the

Re: Multiple problems with "the bat"

Thursday, December 23, 1999, 12:28:35 PM, Nick wrote: > Since we've come to know you're very opinionated in your preferences (I'm > saying that in a nice way :-)) Awww, just admit it, I'm a crusty ol' email curmudgeon. :) > I was wondering what exactly you have against a preview pane? For t

Re: Multiple problems with "the bat"

In Reference to "Multiple problems with "the bat"" From Steve Lamb: >> How do I turn of the feature that marks my messages as "read" if I leave the >> cursor on the message list for more than one second? (I actually didn't read >> the mess

Re: Multiple problems with "the bat"

Wednesday, December 22, 1999, 4:49:47 AM, tracer wrote: > He said he took all of one hour to try and use the bat... That doesn't describe how long he took looking for any particular item before giving up. Personally nearly everything on his list I found and configured to my liking (or at lea

Re: Multiple problems with "the bat"

Hello tracer, On Wed, 22 Dec 1999 19:58:53 +0700 you told us : FF> Why doesn't CTRL-R reply for messages, like Eudora? How do I FF> customize this? t> But it works in my version, try it!! It work here too -- - syafril - *

Re[2]: Multiple problems with "the bat"

Hello Thomas Fernandez, On Wed, 22 Dec 1999 20:58:14 +0800 GMT your local time, which was Wednesday, December 22, 1999, 7:58:14 PM (GMT+0700) my local time, Thomas Fernandez wrote: Thomas> Hallo tracer, Thomas> On Wed, 22 Dec 1999 14:42:26 +0700 GMT your local time, which was Thomas> Wednesday,

Re: Multiple problems with "the bat"

Hallo tracer, On Wed, 22 Dec 1999 14:42:26 +0700 GMT your local time, which was Wednesday, December 22, 1999, 3:42:26 PM (GMT+0800) my local time, tracer wrote: Frank>> Why doesn't CTRL-R reply for messages, like Eudora? How do I customize this? t> Seems to work on my machine... As a matter of

Re: Multiple problems with "the bat"

On Wed, 22 Dec 1999 13:20:10 +0700, Frank Farance wrote: > In Win98, my date/time preferences are set to ISO format: > -MM-DD HH:MM:SS > Why don't they appear that way in the received/created columns? Is this a TB! setting or a windows setting? The Bat! shows message dates in a par

Re[3]: Multiple problems with "the bat"

Hello Thomas Fernandez, On Wed, 22 Dec 1999 16:04:39 +0800 GMT your local time, which was Wednesday, December 22, 1999, 3:04:39 PM (GMT+0700) my local time, Thomas Fernandez wrote: Thomas> Hi Steve, Thomas> welcome back. :-) Thomas> on Wednesday, December 22, 1999, 3:42:46 PM GMT+0800, Steve La

Re[2]: Multiple problems with "the bat"

Hello Januk Aggarwal, On Tue, 21 Dec 1999 23:07:07 -0800 GMT your local time, which was Wednesday, December 22, 1999, 2:07:07 PM (GMT+0700) my local time, Januk Aggarwal wrote: Januk> Read all your new mail, or go to Options and check out that menu. Januk> Really, how much did you look around bef

Re: Multiple problems with "the bat"

Hello Frank Farance, One doesnt learn a program in an hour and while the Bat's docucmentation could be improved a lot and while there are bugs, most of these things can be found relatively easy by either looking at the various menus or by asking someone to help you setup the program... Frank>

Re[2]: Multiple problems with "the bat"

Hi Steve, welcome back. :-) on Wednesday, December 22, 1999, 3:42:46 PM GMT+0800, Steve Lamb wrote: FF>>> How do I turn off the animation of the bat in the task bar? SL> Options / Icon Animation. Didn't know that. Thanks - but I like the animation. FF>>> Why doesn't CTRL-R reply for mess

Re: Multiple problems with "the bat"

Tuesday, December 21, 1999, 10:20:10 PM, Frank wrote: > -MM-DD HH:MM:SS > Why don't they appear that way in the received/created columns? Because TB! doesn't use the Windows settings. > For today's messages, why don't they have today's date? Because it is a given that if a

Re: Multiple problems with "the bat"

Tuesday, December 21, 1999, 10:43:47 PM, Thomas wrote: > Two possiblities: > 1.) On an account level: Account/Properties.../Templates/New Message. > 2.) On a folder level: Folder/Properties/Template. Three. Recipient level at Addressbook / Recipient / Properties. FF>> How do I turn off the

Re: Multiple problems with "the bat"

Hello Frank, Tuesday, December 21, 1999, 10:20:10 PM, you wrote: > In Win98, my date/time preferences are set to ISO format: > -MM-DD HH:MM:SS > Why don't they appear that way in the received/created columns? This is standard for most mail programs. Since presumably you know tod

Re: Multiple problems with "the bat"

Hi Frank, on Wednesday, December 22, 1999, 2:20:10 PM GMT+0800, Frank Farance wrote: Many questions. Let me try to anser some: FF> In Win98, my date/time preferences are set to ISO format: FF> -MM-DD HH:MM:SS FF> Why don't they appear that way in the received/created columns? How d

Multiple problems with "the bat"

In Win98, my date/time preferences are set to ISO format: -MM-DD HH:MM:SS Why don't they appear that way in the received/created columns? For today's messages, why don't they have today's date? How do I edit the "new message template"? ... there isn't any information in the Help f