Hi Roberto,
On Wed, 12 Dec 2001 23:55:58 -0800GMT (13/12/2001, 15:55 +0800GMT),
Roberto Machorro wrote:
RM I thought the calculator and sp where a joke, that some people where
RM joking about it... Is it for real?
They are indeed implemented in the current beta. However, the code is
very small
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Thomas!
On 13 Dec 2001 at 08:18:52 you wrote:
It is happening. Stefan announced a short while ago he was writing on
the newsreader. The way I understand it, it will be a plug-in, though.
You don't need to load it if you don't want to use
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Thomas!
On 13 Dec 2001 at 09:12:28 you wrote:
They are indeed implemented in the current beta. However, the code is
very small and it does therefore not qualify as bloat.
Don't you think that many small items abound to bigness? Bloat is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Thomas!
On 13 Dec 2001 at 08:23:49 you wrote:
No, I think v2.0 might humbly be called v1.54.
Maybe the main problem lies with the continual development . We are
accustomed to pay for even minor steps up every year with major
companies'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Januk,
On 13 December 2001 at 20:15:15 [GMT-0800] (which was 04:15 where I
live) Januk Aggarwal wrote to Rémi Pach and made these points:
2. I have not heard RITLabs make any comment that 1.54 will be
released as V.2. I have also not heard
@ 15:23:49 +0800 [ Thu, 13 Dec 2001], Thomas F [TF] contributed this
to our collective wisdom:
...
TF No, I think v2.0 might humbly be called v1.54.
Exactly so. A typical company would have had TB! at about version 6 if
they'd done the sort of development and enhancements that I've seen
since
@ 06:58:27 -0500 [ Thu, 13 Dec 2001], Allie C Martin [ACM] contributed
this to our collective wisdom:
...
ACM I concur with Marck and Januk that their development course has been
ACM impressive... ^
chuckle This should have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Rémi,
On 12 December 2001 at 16:49:09 [GMT+0200] (which was 14:49 where I
live) Rémi Pach wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and made these
points:
RP Let me quote:
If you really want to, you're welcome, but the truth is, time has
passed and the best
Hello,
In an interview with Stefan Tanurkov published on your web site at
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/interview.html, the author himself
announced the following features and the imminence of the first beta
release (that was in January 2000). Let me quote:
Plugins: Yes, that is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 12 Dec 2001 21:30:27 +0200GMT (which was 20:30 +0100GMT where I live),
Rémi Pach thought about Just curious why and wrote:
I couldn't disagree more. You are completely wrong. More than 50% of
the goals you have listed above have been
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 12 Dec 2001 22:01:02 +0200GMT (which was 21:01 +0100GMT where I live),
Rémi Pach thought about Just curious why and wrote:
why do you need a radically different mail agent? I'm very content
that TB! is continuously improved. ;o)
RP I
Hello Rémi,
Historians believe that Wednesday, December 12, 2001 at 22:01 GMT
+0200 was when, Rémi Pach [RP] typed the following:
RP I am also happy overall with TB as it is. Don't get me wrong.
Your posts suggest that you are very discontented. Perhaps it is
because your posts haven't
Roberto,
Wednesday, December 12, 2001, 9:49:30 PM, Roberto wrote:
RP Newsreader: We still have not decided on what it will look like -
RP as a plug-in or as a built-in function...
MDP I have no idea what is happening with that.
Roberto I *really* hope it doesn't happen. If TB is a MUA, it
Hello Roberto Machorro,
On Wednesday, December 12 2001 at 06:49 PM PDT, you wrote:
RP Almost everything will be plug-in/script driven (menu items,
RP toolbar buttons, macros, filter actions etc. included).
MDP Not the way it worked out (shrug).
Good. I know most TB users are 'power
Hi Roberto,
On Wed, 12 Dec 2001 18:49:30 -0800GMT (13/12/2001, 10:49 +0800GMT),
Roberto Machorro wrote:
RM You mean that there is a TB running natively under Linux as we read
RM this e-mail? (beta or whatever)
Not quite yet. TB is being recoded from Delphi 2 to Delphi 6,
module-by-module (that
On 12/7/2001, Marc van Breemen wrote:
I'm a former Calypso user which is, as you maybe know, now orphaned
by the owner. So let's say it's dead. Now I am looking for the best
replacement. Two email clients are left in my search: Becky and The
Bat. Both are extremely good.
Greetings, fellow
Hello Marc, hi list,
On Friday, December 07, 2001 'Marc van Breemen' wrote:
Can I rely on RitLabs that they introduce The Bat version 2 in the
very near future?
I don't belive it will be finished within the next three or four
months. but really nobody knows that exactly. Probably even
@ 10:17:51 -0500 [ Sat, 8 Dec 2001], Don Zeigler [DZ] wrote these
words of wisdom:
...
DZ It doesn't bother me that much -- TB does what I need it to do for
DZ now, any any new features, to me, are nothing but gravy. I'll
DZ agree that the pace of development has been a little slow,
I disagree
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Allie,
On 08 December 2001 at 12:47:15 [GMT-0500] (which was 17:47 where I
live) Allie C Martin wrote to Don Zeigler on TBUDL and made these
points:
ACM Many are however impatient because v2 is slated to have some
ACM important interface
On 7 Dec 2001, 1:40:12 PM, Marc van Breemen wrote:
Can anybody explain me why RitLabs introduces new features (like
common folders) in an 'old' version (version 1.xx) when they are
very (I hope) busy with finishing (I hope) version 2.? If I were
them I put all my effort in completing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Dwight!
On 7 Dec 2001 at 20:52:07 you wrote:
It's been suggested on the Beta list that current development is beta
testing of version 2.
To clarify, Maxim seems to have told in Cologne that v.2 is under way
for the early months (even
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Marc!
On 7 Dec 2001 at 20:40:12 you wrote:
BUT: I want a email client that will last for a long long time. I don't
want to start using a email client again that will be discontinued at
some time. Can I rely on RitLabs that they introduce
22 matches
Mail list logo
