Hi Günter,
That makes some sense if I understand it correctly: with IMAP, the
folder structure moves from the local computer to the server
Theoretically, the other way around: What is on the server will be
seen by the client, by any client. Of course, you use the client to
create and move
Guten Tag Bob Riley,
Then at the end of the article, it says this about TB!:
There are currently no known troubleshooting issues with this client.
You know that this is not true. TheBat IMAP _is_ a troubleshooting
issue to begin with. Even the developers admit that the system is
rotten from
Hi Alto,
On Fri, 2008-07-18 at 10:11 +0200, you wrote:
Guten Tag Bob Riley,
Then at the end of the article, it says this about TB!:
There are currently no known troubleshooting issues with this client.
I was merely quoting the above from the fastmail.fm mail client setup:
Hello all,
Friday, July 18, 2008, Bob Riley wrote:
I was merely quoting the above from the fastmail.fm mail client setup:
http://www.fastmail.fm/docs/imap/thebat.htm
On the above page is this:
The Bat! is an excellent POP client, but its IMAP support is currently
extremely limited. If you
On Friday, July 18, 2008, 12:49:34 PM, Bob Riley wrote:
I would love to use TB for IMAP but won't until you more
knowledgeable people say TB is very practical in IMAP.
I would be interested to know what features I am missing. I too tried
lots of those other mailers, such as thunderbird,
Hi Günter,
I'm looking for the best way to achieve the above, i.e. having the
entire message base (something like 70,000 messages) available at both
locations.
Just use IMAP instead of POP. Keep in mind that TheBat's IMAP is quite
buggy at the moment though, so you might want to wait (and
Hi,
IMAP is no option, my email provider doesn't support it.
Well - it is what you are looking for. Go figure. ;-)
Should you lose the flash-drive, you lose only a cheap memory
device, but all the information will still be present in a backup
file on one of your computers. Restoring the
Hello Günter,
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 15:37:46 +1000 GMT (17/07/2008, 12:37 +0700 GMT),
Günter Minnerup wrote:
GM I'm looking for the best way to achieve the above, i.e. having the
GM entire message base (something like 70,000 messages) available at both
GM locations.
This is what I have! The whole
Hello Günter,
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 23:22:06 +1000 GMT (17/07/2008, 20:22 +0700 GMT),
Günter Minnerup wrote:
GM Sure, that keeps the message base available on both computers. But it
GM also means that you have to plough through all incoming messages twice
GM as they are downloaded to the other
Hello Stuart,
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 08:29:36 -0500 GMT (17/07/2008, 20:29 +0700 GMT),
Stuart Cuddy wrote:
[IMAP]
SC As far as quota on the server you may have to create an archive for older
SC messages and then copy your old messages to the archive on both computers
and
SC then delete them off
Hello Günter,
As it turns out, IMAP is an option after all... But as it is
impractical to keep my entire message base on the server, does IMAP
allow me to:
- download messages to both computers
With IMAP you're not supposed to download anything. You only have one
message base (on the IMAP
On Thursday, July 17, 2008, 8:55:40 AM, Günter Minnerup wrote:
Can't I just set it to delete (from the server) messages older then 7 days
automatically, given that I have all messages on both computers as
local copies?
as long as you check mail with both computers within that timeframe.
On Thursday, July 17, 2008, 8:51:50 AM, Günter Minnerup wrote:
- set TB! to delete message from the server periodically (say, every
week, to stay within the quota)
I have a dummy account for archiving on my desktop, which is password
protected so that it doesn't regularly get in the way and TB
Hi Everyone,
On Thu, 2008-07-17 at 09:56 +0200, Alto wrote:
Hi Günter,
I'm looking for the best way to achieve the above, i.e. having the
entire message base (something like 70,000 messages) available at both
locations.
Just use IMAP instead of POP. Keep in mind that TheBat's IMAP is
On Thursday, July 17, 2008, 12:09:58 PM, Bob Riley wrote:
They do say, unlike what I hear in our TB newsgroups, that TB has no
reported issues with their IMAP.
I am very happy with the combination of fastmail and thebat, although
I will be even happier when a few niggling issues are addressed
Hi Everyone,
On Thu, 2008-07-17 at 12:38 -0500, Dwight Corrin wrote:
On Thursday, July 17, 2008, 12:09:58 PM, Bob Riley wrote:
They do say, unlike what I hear in our TB newsgroups, that TB has no
reported issues with their IMAP.
I am very happy with the combination of fastmail and
On Thursday, July 17, 2008, 9:46:43 PM, Günter Minnerup wrote:
I have such an archive account already, to keep my POP3 message base
manageable. So what you're saying is simply move everything beyond
the server quota into the archive account?
exactly
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385 phone
On Thursday, July 17, 2008, 9:39:12 PM, Günter Minnerup wrote:
and all
of TB's filtering of the inbox to the folders therefore takes place at
server level?
actually, you make use of the IMAP filters. This works better than
filtering locally, because otherwise, sometimes you are filtering with
18 matches
Mail list logo
