Hello Roelof,
Tuesday, October 1, 2013, 12:20:28 PM, you wrote:
IAW>> At the moment I have both set to TLS and the incoming port is 995 wit
IAW>> the outgoing one 465.
RO> That should work.
It works for me!
--
Best Wishes,
Mark
using The Bat! 5.8.2
92 days remain
Hallo Ian,
On Tue, 1 Oct 2013 19:03:43 +1000GMT (1-10-2013, 11:03 , where I
live), you wrote:
IAW> The thing is that for outgoing they say SSL/TLS, bit for incoming they
IAW> just say SSL.
Basically SSL shouldn't be used anymore, TLS fixed some bugs in the
protocol, IIRC. However, p
Hallo Ian,
On Tue, 1 Oct 2013 16:47:26 +1000GMT (1-10-2013, 8:47 , where I
live), you wrote:
IAW> Regular
IAW> Secure to regular port (STARTTLS)
IAW> Secure to dedicated port (TLS)
IAW> Which one do I use?
Depends on the port you have to use.
--
Groetjes, Roelof
I think, therefore, I cannot
gt; On one account I am downloading the mail from POP via SSL on port 995.
> The provider changed the certificate and now I get very time when
> TheBat tries to download the mail an error window about an unknown
> certificate. The "show certificate" is grayed out.
> The connec
Hello
On one account I am downloading the mail from POP via SSL on port 995.
The provider changed the certificate and now I get very time when
TheBat tries to download the mail an error window about an unknown
certificate. The "show certificate" is grayed out.
The connection log:
using avast! anti-virus. An update a few weeks ago caused this
TF> problem (or something similar) for all accounts using TSL or SSL.
TF> The solution offered here works for me. If you are using avast!, that
TF> might have been the reason at your end too.
Yes, that is most likely the cas
(or something similar) for all accounts using TSL or SSL.
PVN> Avast 8 now checks encrypted mail transmission as stated in the
PVN> documentation supplied with the upgrade. It is necessary to export the
PVN> avast mail scanner certificate from the windows store and import it
PVN> in
5/11/2013 12:54 PM
Hi Thomas,
On 5/10/2013 Thomas Fernandez wrote:
TF> I am using avast! anti-virus. An update a few weeks ago caused this
TF> problem (or something similar) for all accounts using TSL or SSL.
Avast 8 now checks encrypted mail transmission as stated in the
documen
go caused this
problem (or something similar) for all accounts using TSL or SSL.
The solution offered here works for me. If you are using avast!, that
might have been the reason at your end too.
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/
Message reply created with The
Hi,
>> The posts on the web say it is because the cert is unknown and to
>> download its file.
M> Or that a mailserver you connect to has changed certificates.
Yes, that is possible. But it was happening with many sites and all at
once. Plus, in the ten years or so of using TB, it never happened
Hi
On Wednesday 1 May 2013 at 6:24:22 PM, in
, Jack wrote:
> The posts on the web say
> it is because the cert is unknown and to download its
> file. This is happening on many emails so that doesn't
> make sense to me. Why would emails that always worked
> before now not be recognized? I'm thin
JS> On Wednesday, May 1, 2013, 19:24:22, Jack wrote:
JS> Try switching to Microsoft CryptoAPI (Options > S/MIME and TLS >
JS> Microsoft CryptoAPI). That'll make The Bat use the Windows certificate
JS> store instead of it's own.
Thank you. That did it. :)
--
Jack
On Wednesday, May 1, 2013, 19:24:22, Jack wrote:
> Does any know how to
> fix this or have any suggestions?
Try switching to Microsoft CryptoAPI (Options > S/MIME and TLS >
Microsoft CryptoAPI). That'll make The Bat use the Windows certificate
store instead of it's own.
--
< Jernej Simončič ><>
I don't know the fix off hand, but I do not believe it is corruption as it has
happened before and others have been helped. You can GET root certificates here
https://www.geotrust.com/resources/root-certificates/index.html
You might peruse the group archives and this site while waiting for a goo
Hi,
I've been using TB for years and, as far as I know, nothing has
changed but now I keep getting "Unknown CA certificate" popups. I
searched the web and found where it said to delete the following
files:
RootCA.ABD
IntermCA.ABD
tbuser.DEF
I did that but it didn't help. The posts on the web s
Hi
On Friday 21 November 2008 at 1:44:05 AM, in
, I wrote:
> but today I find I can not send, just receive. This happens
> sometimes and I usually find it is ok a couple of days (or hours)
> later.
And sure enough, after waiting a short while without altering any
settings, gmail accepted my con
Hi
On Thursday 20 November 2008 at 4:37:10 PM, in
, MAU wrote:
> I also have a gmail account and I can send and receive with TB
> without any problems.
I also have a (little-used) gmail account. I can usually send and
receive just fine but today I find I can not send, just receive. This
happens
All I can say is that various virus infections and other nuisance things
make my PC working in an odd mode I have a gmail account and following
the data supplied had it running with the bat when installed the first time.
Problem is, at the moment it doesn't work As mentioned, make sure
you
Hello Scott,
> It is something wrong with The Bat!
Maybe with *your* configuration of The Bat!, but not with The Bat
itself. I also have a gmail account and I can send and receive with TB
without any problems.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v4.0.34.25 (AL
Hello,
No, I am enabling options just as you instructed and all guides list
from Internode and Gmail. It is something wrong with The Bat!
Regards
--
Scott
Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/theba
Hallo Scott,
On Thu, 20 Nov 2008 23:32:45 +1030GMT (20-11-2008, 14:02 +0100, where
I live), you wrote:
SS> I have tried them both months ago and had the same problem. It is
SS> something wrong with The Bat.
It isn't very likely that it is TB, after all I can connect just fine
with TB and gami
The problem is, it is The Bat. I cannot get Internode to work either.
If I can get both services to work fine with Thunderbird on the same
computer, why do they not work with The Bat?>
I have tried them both months ago and had the same problem. It is
something wrong with The Bat.
Thanks
--
Scott
On Thursday, November 20, 2008, Scott Sims scripted:
> I have tried doing it exactly as it has said and you have discribed. t
> refuses to work, both with Internode and Gmail.
> I am using Gmail for your domain.
Greetings Scott, 07:20, Thursday, November 20, 2008
I had exactly th
Hello.
I have tried doing it exactly as it has said and you have discribed. t
refuses to work, both with Internode and Gmail.
I am using Gmail for your domain.
Thanks
--
Scott
Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.si
Hallo Scott,
On Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:11:02 +1030GMT (20-11-2008, 7:41 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
SS> It will not work with SSL SMTP settings with my ISP Internode or Gmail.
Do as you're told by both servers and enable authentication
This works for me with gmail.
smtp server: smtp.g
How do I enable that?
I have enabled it, in the sub settings.
Perform SMTP Auth RFC 2554
Including my username/password. Tried so many different settings and The Bat
refuses to work.
Tried Thunderbird and it worked find with Internode and Gmail.
Still refuses to work!
Thanks
2008/11/20 Jern
On Thursday, November 20, 2008, 7:41:02, Scott Sims wrote:
> !20/11/2008, 16:52:30: SEND - Message has not been sent. Server reply
> - relaying blocked, read new mail, add 121.91.90.150 to forwarding or
> enable smtp authentication in y
> Settings for Internode are:
> Secure SMTP: securemail.int
Hello.
The Bat! is driving me nuts.
It will not work with SSL SMTP settings with my ISP Internode or Gmail.
Internode Secure SMTP gives me this error when trying to send email
through The Bat:
!20/11/2008, 16:52:30: SEND - Message has not been sent. Server reply
- relaying blocked, read new
. TLS is the
Robin> successor to (and compatible with) SSL.
Many thanks for that...all working just fine now
--
Cheers,
Rexmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current version is 3.99 | 'Using TBUDL' infor
On Thu, 23 Aug 2007 at 16:16:29 +1000, Rex wrote:
> I have a mail account that requires SSL for the Incoming POP
> server. I do not see an option for this on my version of the The
> Bat Professional Edition My system details are below
Under the account properties, select Transport an
G'day Folks
I have a mail account that requires SSL for the Incoming POP server. I do not
see an option for this on my version of the The Bat Professional Edition My
system details are below
Using The Bat! v%THEBATVERSION on %WINDOWSPLATFORMNAME %-
%WINDOWSMAJORVE
Hello Robin,
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 21:18:54 +1000 GMT (29/03/2007, 18:18 +0700 GMT),
Robin Anson wrote:
RA> Now that TB claims to be able to download appointments and other
RA> non-mail stuff from Exchange,
Appointments? I missed that part.
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
There are plenty of fish in the se
Hello Robin,
Thursday, March 29, 2007, 5:18:54 AM, you wrote:
> In particular, my connection uses mutually authenticated SSL, which
> means I need to have a certificate installed somewhere on my system
> to authenticate to the Exchange server.
I haven't tried it with a straight E
t
received.
Now that TB claims to be able to download appointments and other
non-mail stuff from Exchange, I want to try to connect directly to the
Exchange server using TB.
Has anyone successfully done this?
In particular, my connection uses mutually authenticated SSL, which
means I need
Hello Batfolk,
Vili answered me off list, and I thought I'd seed the archives for
when someone else runs into this. I've tried this for Voyager, and I
imagine it'd work for TB! as well.
1) Quit Voyager
2) Rename MAIL/RootCA.EBD to MAIL/RootCA.EB
3) Restart Voyager
Voyager took quite a bit longe
Hi Andrew,
AD> How do I recover the certificate CAs without reinstalling Voyager?
Try to
-quit Voyager
-rename MAIL/RootCA.EBD to MAIL/RootCA.EB
-restart Voyager
Vili
--
Macasoft Bt.
www.thebat.hu
Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL' info
I've just setup voyager to grab my gmail account. While this works, I
get SSL handshake errors because Google uses a self-signed
certificate. TB has greyed out buttons in the popup warning about
accepting the cert, but the buttons are greyed out. The box:
The server didn't prov
Chris-
Thursday, December 8, 2005, 4:22:12 PM, you wrote:
> A proper certificate for the server would also solve the problem.
ROTFL. Stunnel might solve the problem as well.
--
-Mark Wieder
Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4
___
Thursday, December 8, 2005, 7:35:27 AM, you wrote:
RO> Assign that address to a domain name that matches your isp's
RO> certificate (eg mail.isp) in your hosts file.
Yes, that works (added it to the 235 lines of anti-ad entries :). Now have to
figure out how to make Popfile use it... I su
Hello Chris,
On Thu, 8 Dec 2005 18:22:12 -0600 GMT (09/12/2005, 07:22 +0700 GMT),
Chris wrote:
>> A warning pop-up saying "This is insecure blabla" would suffice,
>> IMHO.
C> A proper certificate for the server would also solve the problem.
Sure. But most people don't own their server.
--
Ch
Thomas Fernandez @ 12/08/2005 8:28:37 AM
"ssl"
> A warning pop-up saying "This is insecure blabla" would suffice,
> IMHO.
A proper certificate for the server would also solve the problem.
--
Chris
Quoting when replying to this message is good for you and me.
Hello Roelof,
On Thu, 8 Dec 2005 15:06:27 +0100 GMT (08/12/2005, 21:06 +0700 GMT),
Roelof Otten wrote:
RO> When you really want to do that, you've got to fool TB, but that makes
RO> sure that you realize what you're doing. That's not like some other
RO> clients that say: "Sure, go ahead, it's a f
Hallo Thomas,
On Thu, 8 Dec 2005 20:48:04 +0700GMT (8-12-2005, 14:48 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
TF> TB has certainly lost his appeal to non-geeks.
Well, this was about wanting to use a SSL certificate for a wrong
domain. That has nothing to do with geeky-ness. TB doesn't al
Hello Roelof,
On Thu, 8 Dec 2005 13:35:27 +0100 GMT (08/12/2005, 19:35 +0700 GMT),
Roelof Otten wrote:
L>> I am trying to use SSL for my email. [...] In most other email
L>> clients, you get a dialog allowing you to accept the certificate
L>> anyway. I can't find a set
Hallo Lou,
On Tue, 6 Dec 2005 07:14:26 -0500GMT (6-12-2005, 13:14 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
L> I am trying to use SSL for my email. Because my provider's certificate
does
L> not match my email address (I don't have my own certificate), thebat will
not
L> send/rec
Hallo Lou,
On Tue, 6 Dec 2005 07:14:26 -0500GMT (6-12-2005, 13:14 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
L> I am trying
L> not match my
L> send/receive
L> other email
L> anyway. I can
L> than advice t
Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not
just to the person being re
I am trying to use SSL for my email. Because my provider's certificate does
not match my email address (I don't have my own certificate), thebat will not
send/receive with SSL. I get an error message stating the mismatch. In most
other email clients, you get a dialog allow
Hello kattack,
On 12 October 2005, 11:33 you wrote:
> Quick Question: Does Bat! support SSL? And if the answer is
> Yes, could you tell me where I can find the option to enable
> it for a specific account?
TB! supports TLS. SSL is for use with HTTP, i.e. secure Web pages. TLS
grew o
Hallo kattack,
On Wed, 12 Oct 2005 13:33:06 +0300GMT (12-10-2005, 12:33 +0200, where
I live), you wrote:
K> Hello Bat Users,
Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not
just to the person being replied to, even if their post may have
instigated this reply. Please don't
Hallo kattack,
On Wed, 12 Oct 2005 13:33:06 +0300GMT (12-10-2005, 12:33 +0200, where
I live), you wrote:
K> Thanks in advance.
K>
K> Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all re
Hallo kattack,
On Wed, 12 Oct 2005 13:33:06 +0300GMT (12-10-2005, 12:33 +0200, where
I live), you wrote:
K> Quick Question: Does Bat! support SSL? And if the answer is
K> Yes, could you tell me where I can find the option to enable
K> it for a specific account?
Yes.
Account ->
Hello Bat Users,
Quick Question: Does Bat! support SSL? And if the answer is
Yes, could you tell me where I can find the option to enable
it for a specific account?
Thanks in advance.
Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' informa
session using the 636 port through SSL.
> So I replace the usual 389 port of my ldap address book with the 636
> but the communication apparently does not work.
> Should I need to set up something else and could ssl be used for
> Imap/Pop/Smtp too ?
I have no experience of IMAP or of LDAP b
Hi,
My Imap provider gives my some information in order to secure my e-mail
communications.
He gave me for example the information to secure communication during
ldap session using the 636 port through SSL.
So I replace the usual 389 port of my ldap address book with the 636
but the
Dear Mavers,
On 07:51 15.09.2004, you [Mavers] wrote...
> What do you mean "stunnel solution"?
> Does it mean that I use an unsecured connection? The server disables
> the plain unsecured connection and only accepts the SSL.. so it's
> very annoying
No, I was
Hallo Mavers,
On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 13:51:20 +0800GMT (15-9-2004, 7:51 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
M> What do you mean "stunnel solution"?
Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not
just to the person being replied to, even if their post may have
instigated this re
What do you mean "stunnel solution"?
Does it mean that I use an unsecured connection? The server disables
the plain unsecured connection and only accepts the SSL.. so it's
very annoying
I think I will give up TheBat! for receiving company mail.
Anyway thanks.
On Tue, 14 Se
Hi there Mavers,
On 02:03 13.09.2004, you [Mavers] wrote...
> But if I use the plain unsecured connection, the server will not let
> me get the letter.
> And I can't ask the admin to modify the protocol because it's our
> company's mail system which is so large thus can't be modified easily.
Mhh
Mavers @ 2004-Sep-12 8:03:04 PM
"Problem about the SSL authentication" <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> And I can't ask the admin to modify the protocol because it's our
> company's mail system which is so large thus can't be modified easily.
Could you perh
gt; It means that your POP3 server only supports an unsecure version of
> the SSL protocol. Unfortunately, TheBat does not allow one to overcome
> this, in fact you need to use a plain unsecured connection instead or
> have the server administrator update the SSL protocol on the server.
Hello all,
Friday, September 10, 2004, Jiang Xu wrote:
> The pop3 server needs an SSL authentication, but TheBat! said,
> 2004-9-10, 12:03:21: FETCH - The server uses TLS protocol version 3.0
> which is outdated and insecure (version 3.1 is required)
> How can I resolve this proble
Hi there Jiang,
On 07:20 10.09.2004, you [Jiang Xu] wrote...
> How can I resolve this problem? Does that mean I can't get letters
> from that "TLS protocol version 3.0" server?
It means that your POP3 server only supports an unsecure version of
the SSL protocol. Unfortuna
The pop3 server needs an SSL authentication, but TheBat! said,
2004-9-10, 12:03:21: FETCH - The server uses TLS protocol version 3.0
which is outdated and insecure (version 3.1 is required)
How can I resolve this problem? Does that mean I can't get letters
from that "TLS protocol v
On Wednesday, September 01, 2004, Martyn Drake wrote...
> Well, I think I've figured out what the cause of the problem was with
> The Bat! version 3 not being able to pick up mail from my cPanel server
> earlier this morning.
> As the certificate contains a different host name to that what I'm
Well, I think I've figured out what the cause of the problem was with
The Bat! version 3 not being able to pick up mail from my cPanel server
earlier this morning.
As the certificate contains a different host name to that what I'm using
for the server, I must have somehow just clicked 'con
Hello tb,
On Wed, 18 Feb 2004, at 15:08:50 [GMT +] (which was 15:08 in my
TimeZone) you wrote:
ttcu> I dont appear to have those options???
ttcu> I have in the Authentication for POP3 the following options
ttcu> Regular, MSN, MD5 APOP Challenge Response
ttcu> MD5 CRAM-HMAC Challenge Resp
Hello Maurice,
On Wed, 18 Feb 2004, at 02:34:05 [GMT +0100] (which was 01:34 in my
TimeZone) you wrote:
MS> On Wednesday, February 18, 2004 at 01:07 (which was Wednesday,
MS> February 18, 2004 at 2:07 where I am) Tb [T] wrote:
T>> And where would I set these options? I have looked in Transpo
On Wednesday, February 18, 2004 at 01:07 (which was Wednesday,
February 18, 2004 at 2:07 where I am) Tb [T] wrote:
T> And where would I set these options? I have looked in Transport,
T> Authentication, but all I can see is a fe MD5 options, no StartTTLS
In this dialog, both 'Send' and 'Receive' h
Hello Maurice,
On Tue, 17 Feb 2004, at 15:15:29 [GMT +0100] (which was 14:15 in my
TimeZone) you wrote
MS> Yes it does. The Bat! supports both SMTP and POP3 over SSL and does so
MS> both to specific ports as well as by using the so called 'STARTTLS'
MS> methods available
On Monday, February 16, 2004 at 23:19 (which was Tuesday, February 17,
2004 at 0:19 where I am) Michael Thompson [MT] wrote:
MT> Trouble is that I dont think TB Supports this. Can any one confirm
MT> if it does or does not support SSL, or am I just being thick?
Yes it does. The Bat! su
At 6:19 PM on 2/16/2004, Michael Thompson typed ...
M> I have just been revamping my security on my Network here, and
M> decided to try POP3 over SSL.
M> Trouble is that I dont think TB Supports this. Can any one confirm
M> if it does or does not support SSL, or am I just
Hello tbudl,
I have just been revamping my security on my Network here, and
decided to try POP3 over SSL.
Trouble is that I dont think TB Supports this. Can any one confirm
if it does or does not support SSL, or am I just being thick?
--
Best regards,
Michael ([EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi,
I have a POP-account with Connection set to "Secure to regular port (STARTTLS)"
In my Log I get:
"FETCH - Server reports error. The response is: +OK Begin SSL/TLS
negotiation now."
I don't understand why that is an error. The server is a Courier-Imap
Hi!
I'm playing aroung with IMAP on The Bat 2 and the last thing I need to
get working is to connect our LDAP address book. The problem here is
that the LDAP server only works over SSL.
Somehow I cannot find any option to create an LDAP address book with
SSL. Am I missing something or
Hello Dean,
Personally I tend to use stunnel, this runs as a service locally on my
machine. Don't have to depend on various implementations of SSL. I just
point my servers at 127.0.0.1 and set up stunnel to do the real work..
JC
Saturday, March 29, 2003
D> Hello,
D> Just want
Hello Jonathan,
Saturday, March 29, 2003, 10:48:16 PM, you wrote:
:
> Doesn't that only apply if the server certificate is self signed? If
> the certificate is signed by a trusted root CA, such as verisign, and
> the likes, I think you can skip this step as long as you didn't delete
> them :)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday, March 29, 2003, Marek Mikus wrote...
> [..] You must have Certificate of that server imported in "Trusted
> Root CA" Address Book.
Doesn't that only apply if the server certificate is self signed? If
the certificate is signed by a truste
Hello all,
Sunday, March 30, 2003, Dean wrote:
> Just wanted to check, is there a way to connect with a POP3 Server
> using SSL encryption? I see the MD5 and some of the other options,
> but don't know what those mean in reference to SSL.
The Bat! supports TLS v1 protocol, w
Hello,
Just wanted to check, is there a way to connect with a POP3 Server
using SSL encryption? I see the MD5 and some of the other options,
but don't know what those mean in reference to SSL.
--
Cheers,
Dean
Using The Bat!1.63 B
Does anyone out there connect via TLS-SSL to a server running
Communigate Pro? I can't get The Bat! (any version) to connect. Log
says "Invalid protocol version". My sysadmin says that there may be
incompatibility with our server software. Any helpful comments would
be appr
I've been trying for several day to get The Bat! to connect to my e-mail
server, which requires an SSL connection to ports 995 (POP3) and 465
(SMTP).
Each time I get this log report:
2/26/2003, 14:07:14: FETCH - receiving mail messages
2/26/2003, 14:07:18: FETCH - Initiating TLS handsha
Hello Wijatmoko,
On Monday, February 17, 2003 at 9:22:50 PM you [WP]wrote (at least in
part):
WP> i've try somany times to fecth my account work on POP3S
WP> myrealbox.com (pop3.myrealbox.com:995), and it allways return the
WP> following report. could anyone help??
The only way is to use 'stunne
Tuesday, February 18, 2003, 3:48:25 AM, you wrote:
> (the pop3 servers are working fine, but you probably know that
> already)
i'm ask about POP3S (SSL) not _plain_ POP3, and yes for plain POP3 it work
just fine. but i don't trust
WP> i've try somany times to fecth my account work on POP3S myrealbox.com
(pop3.myrealbox.com:995), and it allways return the following report. could anyone
help??
a few days ago they were having problems with one of their incoming
smtp servers. Maybe they have problems now with the pop3s, check
i've try somany times to fecth my account work on POP3S myrealbox.com
(pop3.myrealbox.com:995), and it allways return the following report. could anyone
help??
>18/02/2003, 03:15:59: FETCH - Certificate S/N: E1BF16B93022E15F196E7C9D3834AA7D,
>algorithm: RSA (508 bits), issued from 28 Nop 2002 t
Hi,
maybe stunnel (www.stunnel.org) is helps you
Mit freundlichen Gruessen / Kind regards
Benjamin Schulz
--
There are 10 types of people: those who understand binary and
those who don't.
Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBUDL" information:
htt
Hello Friends,
Since a few days the university requites SSL if sending E-mail
relayed. I could not yet find any configuration to work with The Bat!
like the below link shows for OutLook Express. Hope somebody can help.
If I use the SMTP of my home provider, this is the email which appears
in my
Hello Sean,
Thursday, September 19, 2002, 12:59:00 AM, you wrote:
S> Wednesday, September 18, 2002, 5:05:01 PM, John wrote:
JT>> I use SSL all the time, now and it works flawlessly. I did have some
JT>> issues when I first started. Here are the problems I had.
JT>&g
Hi Sean,
my university requires SSL for POP3 too. It was the last plaintext
password protocol in use. I changed the settings in The Bat to SSL
and installed the Root CA of the Server Certificate in the
addressbook. Everything seamed ok. There where a line in the log
which said
Hello Sean,
On September 18, 2002, at 3:59 PM, Sean [S] wrote (at least in part):
S> how did you get the certificates into TB? I think that might be
S> (part of) my problem.
If I have them, they came in automatically. I did not install them
manually.
I assume you are talking about certifica
Hello Jonathan,
On September 18, 2002, at 2:42 PM, Jonathan Angliss [JA] wrote (at
least in part):
JA>>> Hmmm... maybe it isn't finding the SSL Certificate in the right
JA>>> place. I'm assuming you installed it into TB? I think it goes
JA>>> under the Tr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, September 18, 2002, Sean wrote...
JA>> Hmmm... maybe it isn't finding the SSL Certificate in the right
JA>> place. I'm assuming you installed it into TB? I think it goes
JA>> under the Trusted Root
se a secure connection,
> but when I change the settings back to regular connection the messages
> arrive immediately.
Hmmm... maybe it isn't finding the SSL Certificate in the right place.
I'm assuming you installed it into TB? I think it goes under the
Trusted Root CA (I think).
JA
elp either.
Sadly TB!s IMAP support is very lacking in the current series (<
1.6.x) which is something most people are hoping will be fixed in v2.
The reason I point this out is because TB! doesn't support SSL IMAP.
- --
Jonathan Angliss
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
--
going to start requiring secure SSL connections for
mail retrieval in the next couple of weeks, and I can not get TB to
connect securely. The mail server should be set up for secure
connections on a dedicated port, but I've tried the other connection
options in TB as well. When I try it through
Has anyone ever used The Bat! with the Qmail TLS SMTP extentions? I'm
having some problems...
When I try to post mail via STARTTLS, qmail reports 'Server reports
error. The respones is: ready for tls tls.'. Outlook and Mozilla both
work with this. I have installed the certificate in The Bat!
Does
Hello Phil,
On Tuesday, August 13, 2002 at 9:08:36 AM you [PS] wrote (at least in
part):
PS>>> Can anyone else confirm/deny that IMAP4 in The Bat 1.61 will not use
PS>>> SSL, no matter what you set the account settings to?
>> Yes, I can confirm.
>> When set up to
PS>> Can anyone else confirm/deny that IMAP4 in The Bat 1.61 will not use
PS>> SSL, no matter what you set the account settings to?
> Yes, I can confirm.
> When set up to use IMAP The Bat! always uses 'normal' / 'plain' IMAP
> w/o any SSL.
Thanks f
Hello Phil,
On Tuesday, August 13, 2002 at 8:24:43 AM you [PS] wrote (at least in
part):
PS> Can anyone else confirm/deny that IMAP4 in The Bat 1.61 will not use
PS> SSL, no matter what you set the account settings to?
Yes, I can confirm.
When set up to use IMAP The Bat! always uses &
I posted a few days ago, but didn't hear anything, so am posting
again.
Can anyone else confirm/deny that IMAP4 in The Bat 1.61 will not use
SSL, no matter what you set the account settings to? I've installed
the relevant certificate; TB doesn't seem to even try to initiate
1 - 100 of 138 matches
Mail list logo
