Hi
On Wednesday 3 July 2013 at 8:42:29 PM, in
mid:emd3fda938-0c5b-4776-934b-8b6e977ab39d@peterpc, Peter Fjelsten
wrote:
Sorry, I have received no mail from the list in months
Perhaps something has gone awry with your filter rules. Or maybe your
service provider has started censoring your
Sorry, I have received no mail from the list in months
Current version is 5.2.2 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
this one arrived
--
Rick
Capitalism is institutionalized GREED
v5.4 on Windows 6.2 Build 9200
Using all POP accounts
I download all images
Current version is 5.2.2 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
Hello TBUDL,
testing pgp/mime
--
Henk M. de Bruijn
__
The Bat! E-Mail System version 3.99.29 Pro on Windows XP SP2
AntispamSniper for the Bat! 2.7.1.5
Thawte notary, CAcert assurer, GSWoT introducer
Gossamer Spider Web of Trust
On Fri, 11 Jan 2008, at 09:04:12 [GMT +0100] (which was 9:04 where I
live) Henk M. de Bruijn wrote:
testing pgp/mime
--
Henk M. de Bruijn
__
The Bat! E-Mail System version 3.99.29 Pro on Windows XP SP2
AntispamSniper
On Fri, 11 Jan 2008, at 09:12:22 [GMT +0100] (which was 9:12 where I
live) Henk M. de Bruijn wrote:
On Fri, 11 Jan 2008, at 09:04:12 [GMT +0100] (which was 9:04 where I
live) Henk M. de Bruijn wrote:
testing pgp/mime
sig delimiter not working :-(
Both working now?
--
Henk
Hi Henk M. de Bruijn,
On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 09:04:12 +0100
Henk M. de Bruijn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello TBUDL,
testing pgp/mime
gpg: armor header: Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Msys/MingW32) - GPGrelay v0.959
gpg: Signature made 01/11/08 08:04:14 using RSA key ID B464DD0F
gpg: using classic trust
Hallo Henk,
On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 09:20:52 +0100GMT (11-1-2008, 9:20 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
HMD Both working now?
Yep.
--
Groetjes, Roelof
What garlic is to salad, insanity is to art.
http://www.voormijalleen.nl/
The Bat! 4.0.0.9 (ALPHA)
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
3
Hallo Henk,
On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 09:04:12 +0100GMT (11-1-2008, 9:04 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
HMD testing pgp/mime
moderator on
As you're testing something with an alpha, you might consider doing
that on tbbeta...
moderator off
--
Groetjes, Roelof
Atari computers make great boat
On Fri, 11 Jan 2008, at 12:25:45 [GMT +0100] (which was 12:25 where I
live) Roelof Otten wrote:
Hallo Roelof,
On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 09:04:12 +0100GMT (11-1-2008, 9:04 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
HMD testing pgp/mime
moderator on
As you're testing something with an alpha, you might
Henk
On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 at 09:04:12 +0100, Henk wrote:
testing pgp/mime
I get an invalid signature and an unknown signature format here.
--
Robin
Using The Bat! v3.99.25
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
Popfile v0.22.4
On Sat, 12 Jan 2008, at 10:07:21 [GMT +1100] (which was 0:07 where I
live) Robin Anson wrote:
Robin,
On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 at 09:04:12 +0100, Henk wrote:
testing pgp/mime
I get an invalid signature and an unknown signature format here.
Something went wrong, but I think I have found
On Sat, 12 Jan 2008 at 03:57:33 +0100, Henk wrote:
I get an invalid signature and an unknown signature format here.
Something went wrong, but I think I have found the solution?
No, I get the same result. However I was using the internal support
(RFC-1991). When I searched out my copy of PGP
Hello Peter!
On Saturday, December 16, 2006, 6:07 PM, you wrote:
I am registered at the silverstones.. Website. But if I go to the
proper pageto D/L I end up with the old beta.
Ah, yes.
For some reason, ever since the ALPHA beta series came in--at
least--the RitLabs team hasn't kept that
. Certainly it is for me.
So, if you've been considering signing up for beta testing, now is a
particularly auspicious time to do it.
It's tempting to me to close and re-launch The Bat! just for the
pleasure of another look at the cheerful splash screen. But the
biggest benefit, of course
with the beta versions for the benefit of
anyone thinking of taking your advice.
One thing that made me hesitant to participate in beta testing in the
past was the fear that I'd install a beta version and find it
difficult to go back to a working version if something proved to be
wrong with the beta
Hello Perry!
On Saturday, December 16, 2006, 9:20 AM, you wrote:
There's nothing special about my system and others may have a better
one, but once I realized the process of switching versions was that
simple, I felt comfortable signing up for and participating in the
beta testing.
Oh
Hi Mary,
Saturday, December 16, 2006, 10:38:23 AM, you wrote:
MB Oh, thank you so much for posting this system, Perry.
You're welcome, of course, though I didn't realize it would be a
benefit to you but rather that other users, who might be hesitant, as
I was, to take the risk of running
Mary Bull @ 2006-12-16 6:56:08 AM
Benefitting from beta testing mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's tempting to me to close and re-launch The Bat! just for the
pleasure of another look at the cheerful splash screen. But the
biggest benefit, of course, is the collection of features and fixes
version 3.86.11 is running well, reliably, and stably, according
Mary to everything I hear. Certainly it is for me.
Mary So, if you've been considering signing up for beta testing, now is a
Mary particularly auspicious time to do it.
Mary It's tempting to me to close and re-launch The Bat! just
Hello Chris!
On Saturday, December 16, 2006, 1:22 PM, you wrote:
It's tempting to me to close and re-launch The Bat! just for the
pleasure of another look at the cheerful splash screen. But the
biggest benefit, of course, is the collection of features and fixes
of this latest beta version.
Hello Peter!
On Saturday, December 16, 2006, 1:03 PM, you wrote:
I tried to get this beta version, but if I go to the website:
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/
the latest version for download is 3.81.18 which is older than my
regular version. Where did you find the 06/Xmas version?
Maxim
Hello Mary,
Saturday, December 16, 2006, 3:21:47 PM, you wrote:
Mary Hello Peter!
Mary On Saturday, December 16, 2006, 1:03 PM, you wrote:
I tried to get this beta version, but if I go to the website:
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/
the latest version for download is 3.81.18 which is
Maxim Masiutin (of the RitLabs development team) announced it on
Mary TBBETA yesterday.
Mary TBBETA mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Where can I download it?
Go here, and sign up for beta testing and subscribe to TBBETA.
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
That is, if you're not already
On Saturday, December 16, 2006 Peter Kerekes, [PK] wrote:
snipped a bit
Where can I download it?
3.86.11 BETA is available at
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/tbb38611.rar
--
Regards,
Ron Secord
Using TB! 3.86.11 beta Professional
Under Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 2
Hello Ron,
Saturday, December 16, 2006, 5:20:13 PM, you wrote:
Ron On Saturday, December 16, 2006 Peter Kerekes, [PK] wrote:
Ron snipped a bit
Where can I download it?
Ron 3.86.11 BETA is available at
Ron http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/tbb38611.rar
Thank you for the
is older than my
regular version. Where did you find the 06/Xmas version?
Mary Maxim Masiutin (of the RitLabs development team) announced it on
Mary TBBETA yesterday.
Mary TBBETA mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Where can I download it?
Mary Go here, and sign up for beta testing and subscribe to TBBETA.
Mary
Hello Richard!
On Saturday, September 30, 2006, 8:18 AM, you wrote, in re Mary Bull's
comment on what Alexander Kunz remarked to her on TBOT when she said
she was afraid of destroying her fragile Bat if she put the
txt2html.regexps file into its directory:
MB I told Alex to his face that he's a
To: Thomas Fernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TF CC:
TF BCC:
TF Date: Tuesday, January 10, 2006, 1:30:14 AM
TF Subject: Testing
TF ===8==Original message text===
TF On Monday, January 9, 2006 @ 4:48:02 AM [-0700], Thomas Fernandez wrote:
MT Haven't seen anything since Fridayjust
for re-posting this!
TF This is a forwarded message
TF From: Matt Thoene [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TF To: Thomas Fernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TF CC:
TF BCC:
TF Date: Tuesday, January 10, 2006, 1:30:14 AM
TF Subject: Testing
TF ===8==Original message text===
TF On Monday, January 9
Dear Maurice,
@10-Jan-2006, 10:09 +0100 (10-Jan 09:09 here) Maurice McAdam [MM] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck:
... snip
TF problem. Anyone else having POP hanging issues?
MDP Yes!!! If there is a glitch on the network and a packet goes missing,
MDP there is a timeout missing within the
Hello Marck,
On Tuesday, January 10, 2006, 09:11:46 AM, which was 10:34:06 AM
where I am, you wrote:
MDP @10-Jan-2006, 10:09 +0100 (10-Jan 09:09 here) Maurice McAdam [MM] in
MDP mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck:
MDP ... snip
TF problem. Anyone else having POP hanging issues?
MDP Yes!!! If
Matt,
I think you meant to send this to the list and not to my PM.
Cheers,
Thomas.
This is a forwarded message
From: Matt Thoene [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Thomas Fernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC:
BCC:
Date: Tuesday, January 10, 2006, 1:30:14 AM
Subject: Testing
===8==Original message
Hallo TBUDL,
Never mind my signature, I'm testing an IMAP account.
--
Groetjes, Roelof
Everyone IS entitled to my opinion.
The Bat! 3.0.2.1
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
1 pop3 account, server on LAN
Current version is 3.0.1.33
Hallo Roelof,
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 19:29:23 +0200GMT (20-10-2004, 19:29 +0200, where
I live), you wrote:
Never mind my signature,
I'm testing an IMAP account.
If I only found out why my filter doesn't work.
--
Groetjes, Roelof
Welcome to Hell. Here's your copy of Windows95. - Satan
Hallo Alexander,
This is message sent from a two account installation of 2.12 done
from a common folder with the identity set to my list address.
--
Groetjes, Roelof
Disclaimer: Any opinion stated in this message is not necessarily shared by my budgies
or rabbits.
Hello everyone,
03-Sep-2004 17:44, Roelof you wrote:
This is message sent from a two account installation of 2.12 done from a
common folder with the identity set to my list address.
...to resolve the issue for the public: identity is the from adress
*only*. It does not affect the account,
testing
Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Batlovers
Please ignore this message. It is a test because I can't seem to get
through to the list.
--
Robin
Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1
Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
Dear Royminoo,
@01-Aug-2004, 10:47 +0530 (01-Aug 06:17 UK time) pk roy said:
... snip
now posted my pix today on
http://www.pcwize.com/thebat/account.php successfully added image
from HDD to my personal vCard can u see me ?
Not yet - you haven't configured a trigger for us to do so. You need
Hello Marck,
Not yet - you haven't configured a trigger for us to do so. You need
to follow the instructions about adding an X-Rogue header or using
the :trigger: signature format. Of course, the latter also depends
upon you using a conventional signature method where the signature
follows a
Dear Royminoo,
@01-Aug-2004, 23:10 +0530 (01-Aug 18:40 UK time) pk roy said to
Marck:
... snip
upon you using a conventional signature method where the signature
follows a cut mark ;-) .
i am trying to follow the instructions by adding X-Rogue header /
trigger: signature format..
Hello Marck,
Not yet - you haven't configured a trigger for us to do so. You need
to follow the instructions about adding an X-Rogue header or using
the :trigger: signature format. Of course, the latter also depends
upon you using a conventional signature method where the signature
follows a
Dear Royminoo,
@01-Aug-2004, 23:45 +0530 (01-Aug 19:15 UK time) pk roy said to
Marck:
... snip
to follow the instructions about adding an X-Rogue header
... snip
follows a cut mark ;-) .
(which you still seem to be having trouble with!)
i have probably been able to define the header as
hello
have been following the threads on rogueemoticons .
have been able to config. to see the pix of senders .
successful..
now posted my pix today on http://www.pcwize.com/thebat/account.php
successfully
added image from HDD to my personal vCard
can u see me ?
thanks in advance
pk roy [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greetings All,
Does anyone want to help me test the new chat thingie? First, send me
an email, let me know what to do and I will test my little system with
the fully undocumented bat.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- --
Rev. Michael L. Wilson, MBA
Philospher
Hello Marck,
Working now, must of been the dutaint servers.
MAU Yes, that was it.
... except dutaint no longer actually host our lists, although
Syafril has let us continue to use the name and that it was mailman
(rather than the server itself) that had stopped working.
You are right on
Hello all,
Sorry, disregard.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v2.10.01
Current version is 2.10.01 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Hi,
Not sure if it's my mail server or the list...anyone out there? I
haven't seen anything come in since 2:30am PST...
--
Regards,
Matt
Current version is 2.10.01 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Hello Ron,
Not sure if it's my mail server or the list...anyone out there? I
haven't seen anything come in since 2:30am PST...
Working now, must of been the dutaint servers.
Yes, that was it.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v2.10.01
Dear Miguel,
@29-Apr-2004, 00:18 +0200 (28-Apr 23:18 UK time) MAU [MAU] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Ron:
Not sure if it's my mail server or the list...anyone out there? I
haven't seen anything come in since 2:30am PST...
Working now, must of been the dutaint servers.
MAU Yes, that was
Hello ,
Tagline of the day:
Eagles may soar, but weasels are seldom sucked into jet engines.
--
Leif (TB list moderator and fellow end user).
Using The Bat! 2.05 Beta/1 under Windows 2000 5.0
Build 2195 Service Pack 4 on a Pentium 4 2GHz with 512MB
Hello tbudl,
I've removed my template based X-Archive, testing to see that Gmane
does it.
Tagline of the day:
Meow SPLAT! Woof SPLAT!Jeez, it's really raining today.
--
Leif (TB list moderator and fellow end user).
Using The Bat! 2.05 Beta/1 under Windows 2000 5.0
Build 2195
Leif Gregory, [LG] wrote:
LG I've removed my template based X-Archive, testing to see that
LG Gmane does it.
Gmane simply encrypts the addresses. It doesn't add the header since
it's a global option for that group, so don't look for it. :)
--
-=[ Allie ]=- (List Moderator and fellow end-user
On Thursday, March 11, 2004, 5:34 PM, you wrote:
LG I've removed my template based X-Archive, testing to see that Gmane
LG does it.
I don't see the x-archive header, is it supposed to still be there??
I also saw a post from.. The minnesotan? he had an x-header that said
X-no-archive
Hello Allie,
Thursday, March 11, 2004, 3:47:06 PM, you wrote:
Allie Gmane simply encrypts the addresses. It doesn't add the header
Allie since it's a global option for that group, so don't look for
Allie it. :)
Right, but if I have that header in there, then when I look at it in
the HTTP GMane
Hello Paul,
Thursday, March 11, 2004, 3:53:10 PM, you wrote:
Paul I don't see the x-archive header, is it supposed to still be
Paul there??
Oh boy... ;-)
On the TB lists, no you will not see the x-archive header unless you
put it there manually.
However, when GMane gets the message, if will
Paul I don't see the x-archive header, is it supposed to still be
Paul there??
LG Oh boy... ;-)
to be PC shouldn't that say :
oh person
or oh/boyohgirl
LG On the TB lists, no you will not see the x-archive header unless you
LG put it there manually.
and we don't need to do that anymore, the
Hello Paul,
Thursday, March 11, 2004, 4:30:38 PM, you wrote:
Paul to be PC shouldn't that say :
Paul oh person
Paul or oh/boyohgirl
Are you saying you're a girl?!?!? ;-)
Paul and we don't need to do that anymore, the list does it, forever,
Paul no question, right?
In theory! grin
Paul and
LG Thursday, March 11, 2004, 4:30:38 PM, you wrote:
Paul to be PC shouldn't that say :
Paul oh person
Paul or oh/boyohgirl
LG Are you saying you're a girl?!?!? ;-)
does a ponytail count?
Paul and we don't need to do that anymore, the list does it, forever,
Paul no question, right?
LG In
This may be a bit off topic, I apologize if it bothers anyone, but I've
only recently discovered a tool that is quite handy with regard to
creating regular expressions. It is similar to the RegEx tester that you
can install in the TB help file (as outlined at the TB FAQ).
Hello Allen,
snipped a bit
For those on the list who use regular expressions a good bit, this
tool ought to come in quite handy.
http://www.weitz.de/regex-coach/
Thank you. Looks very nice for those of us who are not proficient with
Regex.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial -
Hello Allen,
on Sun, 22. Feb 2004 at 14:18:52 -0500 you wrote:
A http://www.weitz.de/regex-coach/
Indeed, very great program!
Must have been some Regex-tutorial which recommended it and I use it
for the more complex rules.
Thanks to your note I now got the update and the mailinglist
Hello tbudl,
testing
--
Best regards,
P.K.Roy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Everyone has a photographic memory. Some don't have film.
Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
PKRF testing
Testing what, dear?
- --
Stuart
Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/11 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1
PGP Key available from ldap://keyserver.pgp.com
... 670 Approximate number of the Beast
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stuart Hemming, [SH] wrote:
PKRF testing
SH Testing what, dear?
Messages to the list including his, aren't reaching him.
The listserv logs do say that messages are being successfully delivered
to his address. I notified him about this so he's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Stuart,
@28-Jul-2003, 14:57 Stuart Hemming [SH] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
PKRF testing
SH Testing what, dear?
Poor Mr/s. Roy hasn't yet seen a posting come from TBUDL. The logs say
they're being sent, s/he just never sees them
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
AM Messages to the list including his, aren't reaching him.
OIC
- --
Stuart
Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/11 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1
PGP Key available from ldap://keyserver.pgp.com
... My opinions may have changed, but not the fact
Dear readers from 'TB!udl List',
Want to send to TB!beta ML but it seams it out of order. So just
testing here if its same or not!
--
best regards
Eddie
Powered by The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 under Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195
PGP (public) is available: www.EddieCastelli.com/pgpkey
Hello Marck,
Wednesday, February 19, 2003, 4:24:05 AM, you wrote:
MDP I see that you prefer to read text in this order g:
MDP [EMAIL PROTECTED] to writing by way normal the in it
MDP join can you, Yes.
By coincidence, I happened to subscribe yesterday, but did not receive
any messages yet,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Michael,
@18-Feb-2003, 19:14 -0800 (03:14 UK time) Michael L. Wilson [MLW] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
MLW I have been on the beta list before, but do not seem to be on
MLW it. Any chance I can get back on?
I see that you
Friday, November 29, 2002, 1:05:05 PM, you wrote:
MDP AV scanner that real-time scan non-malicious temp files in this way
MDP are a PITA for TB. TB is trying to download a message and, before it
MDP can even look at it, the AV software has poked its nose where it
MDP needn't. The rug has been
Friday, November 15, 2002, 6:24:20 PM, Marck scribbled:
MDP -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
MDP Hash: SHA1
MDP Hi 3w,
MDP @16-Nov-2002, 01:04 +0100 (00:04 UK time) 3w [3] in
MDP [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
3 Any suggestions?
MDP I really must put this on the FAQ.
MDP AV
Hello Michael,
On Fri, 29 Nov 2002 06:05:05 -0600 GMT (29/11/02, 19:05 +0700 GMT),
Michael Disabato wrote:
There is a fourth choice if your VS supports it. Use it as a proxy to
get to your POP3 account. Trend Micro's PCCillin does this. I have to
enter the POP3 Server as localhost/servername.
Hello 3w!
On Saturday, November 16, 2002 at 8:09:24 AM you wrote:
He said I should open a thread on fox.wikis.com (he's the creator of
that site) so more people can see that there are other things than M$
to use in terms of mail. Well then let's do that. :-)
Nice to hear.
(I know you guys
Hello Marck!
On Saturday, November 16, 2002 at 1:24:20 AM you wrote:
AV scanner that real-time scan non-malicious temp files in this way
are a PITA for TB.
Sadly with some AV scanners real-time scanning becomes the standard. I
just purchased the newest from F-Secure (now with three scan
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Dierk Haasis [DH] wrote:'
DH Since this new notebook is fast enough and not at all hurt by
DH the good old resource trouble I let it go - or I have to think
DH of disabling the real-time scanner every time I load F-Secure
DH (at start-up of Windows),
Hello Allie!
On Saturday, November 16, 2002 at 11:23:45 AM you wrote:
Also all decent ones I've used allows you to be able to exclude
directories and particular file-types from real-time scanning.
F-Secure has this. I forgot - and can't find it at the moment -, is
there an option within TB to
Saturday, November 16, 2002, 10:57:25 AM, you wrote:
(I know you guys prefer names instead of nicknames, so I'll switch)
Since when?
Well some of this list nicely 'reminded' me in doing so. But hey, if
it's not a problem for you - it ain't one for me! ;-)
cu, 3w
Hello Allie!
On Saturday, November 16, 2002 at 12:06:48 PM you wrote:
Especially if you use IE's engine, as I do. I'd prefer not to, but
it has the rendering engine that works best for me.
Wait for the final of Opera 7; after some early annoyances in the
current beta, I had, I am now
Hi folks
I was curious and checked my security with this site:
http://www.gfi.com/emailsecuritytest/
Now I can't get rid of this Exploit.IFrame Virus and hope that someone
can help me.
Full system scan with newest version of G-Data Antivirenkit
(Dual-Engine with KAV and RAV) doesn't show
Hallo 3w,
On Sat, 16 Nov 2002 01:04:18 +0100GMT (16-11-02, 1:04 +0100GMT, where
I live), you wrote:
3 Full system scan with newest version of G-Data Antivirenkit
3 (Dual-Engine with KAV and RAV) doesn't show anything. However, if TB!
3 is running, suddenly a virus warning appears from different
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi 3w,
16-Nov-2002, 01:04 +0100 (00:04 UK time) 3w [3] in
mid:1244294785.20021116010418;ewanet.ch said:
3 Any suggestions?
I really must put this on the FAQ.
AV scanner that real-time scan non-malicious temp files in this way
are a PITA for TB. TB
Hi Nick!
In message mid:20021018120126.4F21.ANDRIASH;shaw.ca
on Friday, October 18, 2002, 2:07:25 PM, you wrote:
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/MS02-054.asp
NA Thanks Marcus... I have read the article, but I still remain skeptical.
NA Why? Because if that were true, the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday, October 18, 2002, Carren Stuart wrote...
JA The virus doesn't exist inside the archive... it is the archive
JA ;)
But if this is the case then surely that would mean that the moment
you unzip the archive, the virus is executed? I don't
Hello Marcus Ohlström,
On Friday, October 18 2002 at 12:43 AM PDT, you wrote:
I have never heard of a *.zip file that was itself a virus. Is that
what you are referring to, and if so can you point to some
documentation that explains how they do it or how it works?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday, October 18, 2002, Nick Andriash wrote...
I have never heard of a *.zip file that was itself a virus. Is
that what you are referring to, and if so can you point to some
documentation that explains how they do it or how it works?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Friday, October 18, 2002
4:04:09 PM
RE: I was just Eicar test virus testing, when.
Greetings Nick,
On Friday, October 18, 2002, 3:07:25 PM, you wrote:
NA Think of all the hundreds of thousands... or millions... of *.zip files
NA that are being
I think I found a weakness in NOD32 pop3 scanning.
At the moment, I'm running pop3 scanning and AVG with the plug-in.
I thought I'd give this little set-up a test run. So;
1. I sent the test file as a notepad attachment using another of my
e-mail address through e-mailanywhere.com directly
On Thursday, October 17, 2002, Chris Weaven wrote in
mid:1527670089.20021017154635;Surfcity.net:
CW I think I found a weakness in NOD32 pop3 scanning.
Hmmm... This is troubling
I downloaded the most fully nested EICAR test file. When NOD32
scanned it after GetRight pulled it in,
Hi Joseph,
On Thursday, October 17, 2002 19:54 your local time, which was 17:54 my
local time, Joseph N. [JN] wrote;
JN I downloaded the most fully nested EICAR test file. When NOD32
JN scanned it after GetRight pulled it in, it came up positive. I then
JN emailed it from one account to
Hi Chris!
In message mid:1417360232.20021017182805;Surfcity.net
on Thursday, October 17, 2002, 8:28:05 PM, you wrote:
CW Maybe it's just the Eicar file or am I being kind?
The EICAR file should always be caught, otherwise the purpose of it is
defeated.
--
--Scott.
mailto:Wizard;local.nu
In mid:1417360232.20021017182805;Surfcity.net,
Chris Weaven [CW] wrote:'
CW Maybe it's just the Eicar file or am I being kind?
CW Still worrying though!
CW Anyone with any comments, suggestions or anything?
I sent it to you zipped. This is why. If you try to unzip eicar.com
then Amon will stop
Hi Allie,
On Thursday, October 17, 2002 20:51 your local time, which was 18:51 my
local time, Allie Martin wrote;
I sent it to you zipped. This is why. If you try to unzip eicar.com
then Amon will stop you.
But I thought it had a function to check zipped files/compressed files?
Chris.
--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In mid:198914835.20021017195450;qwest.net,
Joseph N. [JN] wrote:'
JN As I said, this is troubling. Anyone have a compelling
JN explanation for this behavior?
The thing is that neither Amon or the incoming plugin scanner will
check archives. However,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In mid:18819068298.20021017185633;Surfcity.net,
Chris Weaven [CW] wrote:'
CW But I thought it had a function to check zipped files/compressed
CW files?
It does. Scan it manually and you'll see.
Trying to open the archive from TB! also results in an
On Thursday, October 17, 2002, Allie C Martin wrote in
mid:154275702148.20021017211416;landscreek.net:
The thing is that neither Amon or the incoming plugin scanner will
check archives. However, the plugin immediately detects the virus
when you try to open the archive. A manual scan of the
Hi Joseph,
On Thursday, October 17, 2002 22:27 your local time, which was 20:27 my
local time, Joseph N. [JN] wrote;
JN Confidence restored. It would be nice, though, if there were some
JN type of notice when trying to open the archive. All I get (with NOD32
JN and WinRAR 3.00) is a WinRAR
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday, 18 October 2002 at 2:51 p.m. Allie wrote:
ACM I sent it to you zipped. This is why. If you try to unzip
ACM eicar.com then Amon will stop you.
OK, now I am interested. I have just done some playing around with the
files myself out of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In mid:1407572987.20021018174028;myrealbox.com,
Carren Stuart [CS] wrote:'
CS Amon *let* me unzip both zipped files without warning me BUT
CS when I attempted to open the unzipped files, it then gave me a
CS warning as I would have expected. I am
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
