Hello Robert,
Friday, April 2, 2004, 9:26:09 PM, you wrote:
RG> Maybe you wait a bit until the situation with that company is clear
RG> enought. Our media reported that Kaspersky himself was arrested
RG> recently. Russian authorities want to investigate how was is possible
RG> that K
On Friday, April 2, 2004, 3:02:00 PM, Gerard wrote:
G> I am considering buying the Kaspersky ani-Virus package.
Maybe you wait a bit until the situation with that company is clear
enought. Our media reported that Kaspersky himself was arrested
recently. Russian authorities want
Hi Bat Users,
I am considering buying the Kaspersky ani-Virus package.
I am not sure if the Pro version is better for me then the standard
version. Would anyone who has the pro-version explain why he bought it?
Also, anyone with experience of the Kaspersky Firewal? Is it worth buying
in
Hi Marck,
Thank you for reminding me of the rules. I somewhat forgot
them...nearly 2 years since I last posted here.
Apologies to all forum members.
--
Best regards,
jlaikan
Current version is 2.02.3 CE | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://ww
Hi jlaikan,
on Sun, 8 Feb 2004 18:01:13 +0400GMT, you wrote:
j> Thanks for the expalnation.I am really happy that ISPs do remove
j> viruses. However, there was a case when the Bat!informed me that an
j> attachment was infected and I could delete it.
Right. The Bat! warns you about double extensi
kan,
TF> On Sun, 8 Feb 2004 08:24:04 +0400 GMT (08/02/2004, 11:24 +0700 GMT),
TF> jlaikan wrote:
>> ***
>> A virus (WORM_MYDOOM.A) was detected in the file
>> (text.zip/text.scr). Action taken = remove
>> ***-***
>> The message c
Hello John,
Saturday, February 7, 2004, 5:18:03 PM, you wrote:
JM> Hello The_Bat! Users,
JM> Could someone send me a virus, I'm wanting to test the AntiVir
JM> Plugin.
How about this site for sending out the test Eicar virus. There are lots of option
for encoding and hidin
Hello,
Sunday, February 8, 2004, 1:25:59 AM, you wrote (possibly edited):
>> Could someone send me a virus, I'm wanting to test the AntiVir
>> Plugin.
Go this site for a comprehensive test:
http://www.gfi.com/emailsecuritytest/
--
Best regards,
Costas
Bonjour John,
JM> Could someone send me a virus, I'm wanting to test the AntiVir
JM> Plugin.
Bad idea (as said before).
You could use http://www.gfi.com/emailsecuritytest/
It send you the Eicar test file by many ways. And other security
vulnerability tests.
--
Regards,
Fra
Hello jlaikan,
On Sun, 8 Feb 2004 08:24:04 +0400 GMT (08/02/2004, 11:24 +0700 GMT),
jlaikan wrote:
> ***
> A virus (WORM_MYDOOM.A) was detected in the file
> (text.zip/text.scr). Action taken = remove
> ***-***
> The message contains Unicode cha
Hi All,
I received on several occasions messages like this.
***
A virus (WORM_MYDOOM.A) was detected in the file (text.zip/text.scr). Action taken =
remove
***-***
The message contains Unicode characters and has been sent as a binary attachment.
My question
Hello jwayne,
> Bad choice. Shouldn't email anything except eicar.
Yes, you are right. And I thought about it after I had clicked Send.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v2.01.3
Winamp Playing: Jimmy Sommers - Lowdown - f. Coolio (Smoothjazz.com -
The world
On Saturday, February 7, 2004, 6:50:09 PM, MAU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
M> Hello John,
>> Could someone send me a virus, I'm wanting to test the AntiVir
>> Plugin.
M> I've just sent a msg with MyDoom.
Bad choice. Shouldn't email
Hi The_Bat! Users,
Saturday, February 7, 2004, 5:50:09 PM, you wrote:
>> Could someone send me a virus, I'm wanting to test the AntiVir
>> Plugin.
M> I've just sent a msg with MyDoom.
Thanks, AntiVir detected it successfully, but only after I saved it
and scanned it
Hello John,
> Could someone send me a virus, I'm wanting to test the AntiVir
> Plugin.
I've just sent a msg with MyDoom.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v2.01.3
Winamp Playing: G-Fire - Passin' Thru (Smoothjazz.com - The world'
On Sunday, February 8, 2004, 0:18:03, John Morse wrote:
> Could someone send me a virus, I'm wanting to test the AntiVir
> Plugin.
Go to this address: <http://www.eicar.org/anti_virus_test_file.htm>, and
mail yourself the test file.
--
begin .sig
< Jer
Hello The_Bat! Users,
Could someone send me a virus, I'm wanting to test the AntiVir
Plugin.
--
John Morse
The_Bat! 2.03 Beta/59
Windows 2000 Service Pack 4 (2195)
Current version is 2.02.3 CE | "Using TBUDL" in
Hello Greg,
Thursday, January 8, 2004, 2:29:12 PM, Greg Strong wrote:
GS> What quality does some of the free AV provide?
AS a reply to this off topic thread which is actually on topic. :-) I
have downloaded, installed, and tested free AVG with TB on this dual
boot system.
Seems to work fine wit
Hello Steve!
On Monday, January 19, 2004, 5:07 AM, you wrote:
SM> You certainly put me going in the right direction here as the error is
SM> caused when NOD32 tries to access MAPI32.dll and when TB! is installed
SM> as a simple MAPI request handler (Options | Preferences |
SM> Applications) it si
Hi Terry and thanks for replying
> http://www.nod32.com/support/ans/6h.htm
> I use NOD32 2.000.6.
Me too. Just the trial version though as would like to evaluate before
I fork out any cash for it
> NOD32 Control Center/NOD32 System Tools/NOD32 System
> Setup/Setup/Notifications/
> If you need
Hi Steve,
On Monday, January 19, 2004 at 9:16 AM, Steve wrote:
> Does anyone use TB with NOD32 Anti-Virus? If so does anyone, on running
> NOD32, experience a message that says words to the effect of "Either
> there is no default mail client or the mail client cannot fulfill t
Hello Steve Mulhall,
maandag 19 januari 2004, 10:16:39, you wrote:
SM> Hi guys,
SM> Does anyone use TB with NOD32 Anti-Virus? If so does anyone, on running
SM> NOD32, experience a message that says words to the effect of "Either
SM> there is no default mail client or the m
Hi guys,
Does anyone use TB with NOD32 Anti-Virus? If so does anyone, on running
NOD32, experience a message that says words to the effect of "Either
there is no default mail client or the mail client cannot fulfill the
messaging request. Please run Microsoft Outlook and set it as the
de
Hello all,
I'd like to put up a selective download filter to kill Sobig.C virus'
messages on the server.
I found a list of possible subjects at
http://www.f-secure.com/v-descs/sober_c.shtml, but would like to take
care of other informations (like Recipient address) in the header,
too.
n't understand and is going to tell
JS>> Virus alert for the same message!
JS>> What's wrong? Kapersky don't works with The Bat! ?
MDP> 1) When you delete a message, it still exists in the TBB file
MDP> 2) Compress the folder to remove the message completely.
MD
Hi Jean,
@1-Jan-2004, 11:37 +0100 (01-Jan 10:37 UK time) Jean Site [JS] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to tbudl:
JS> I have deleted the message in folders Inbox and Trash.
JS> But Kaspersky don't understand and is going to tell
JS> Virus alert for the same message!
JS> What&
Bonjour ,
I have a problem with Kaspersky anti-virus.
This is the message:
C:_Program Files\TheBat!\Mail\Marie-Thérèse Site\inbox\MESSAGES.TBB/[From"ifman.deumer
"<[EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue,23 Dec
I have deleted the message in folders Inbox and Trash.
But Kaspersky don't
Hello Scott,
Sunday, December 21, 2003, 10:15:28 AM, you wrote:
S> Any idea if The Bat would be vulnerable to this??
No, TB! is not vulnerable because it doesn't try to open a file with a
graphic extension as a non-graphic file. However, if an external image
viewer is used (see the options in th
Hello Jernej,
On Mon, 22 Dec 2003 17:38:21 +0100 GMT (22/12/2003, 23:38 +0700 GMT),
Jernej Simonèiè wrote:
>> Thus it appears that The Bat! is not vulnerable
> As far as I've understood, when IE engine
Two different pieces of software.
> encounters an image file, it will try to autodetect what
On Monday, December 22, 2003, 16:14:16, Carsten Thönges wrote:
> Thus it appears that The Bat! is not vulnerable against this
> scenario because it doesn't confuse being a mailreader with being
> a web browser ... like others do.
As far as I've understood, when IE engine encounters an image file,
* Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Be careful how you view your JPG and GIF files (from now on)...
[...]
> Any idea if The Bat would be vulnerable to this??
Take this (non-existant) URL: http://www.example.com/pics/me.jpg
If you visit such a site you'd expect your browser to display the
file
Hello Scott,
On Sun, 21 Dec 2003 02:15:28 -0600 GMT (21/12/2003, 15:15 +0700 GMT),
Scott wrote:
> Be careful how you view your JPG and GIF files (from now on)...
> http://www.vnunet.com/News/1151553
I can't reach that page at the moment.
> the problem is caused by Microsoft's Internet Explorer
Be careful how you view your JPG and GIF files (from now on)...
http://www.vnunet.com/News/1151553
=== Clip ==
Security specialist ISS said contributors to hacker mailing lists have recently
been discussing new techniques to bypass firewalls by mislabelling general HTML
files as JPEGs.
Hi Barry,
on Mon, 13 Oct 2003, at 14:04:11 local time (GMT +0100), you wrote:
BH> Its free, apart from the ads for Contacts own products, and seems
BH> to work very well, It can run as a stand alone application and is
BH> very easy to set up, and deletes off the server which is exa
Hello Carsten,
Monday, October 13, 2003, 10:08:23 AM, you wrote:
>> can't we do the same with TB's Selective Download?
CT> Last but not least it is a command line tool, so you can run it
CT> regularly (via an other's machine cron job, if you don't have a
CT> flatrate).
I've found a Windows
* Jurgen Haug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello Carsten, Sunday, October 12, 2003, 9:36:49 PM, you wrote:
>> * Barry Higginbottom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> This blasted Swen virus is getting me down.
>>> Every day I am getting about 150 Sw
Hello Carsten,
Sunday, October 12, 2003, 9:36:49 PM, you wrote:
> * Barry Higginbottom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> This blasted Swen virus is getting me down.
>> Every day I am getting about 150 Swen emails, [...]
> There is a Windows port of »mailfilter
* Barry Higginbottom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This blasted Swen virus is getting me down.
> Every day I am getting about 150 Swen emails, [...]
There is a Windows port of »mailfilter«. Here is a part of its FAQ
(there is a typical config file at the end
Hello Barry,
On Sun, 12 Oct 2003 12:00:01 +0100 GMT (12/10/2003, 18:00 +0700 GMT),
Barry Higginbottom wrote:
> Every day I am getting about 150 Swen emails, some with the
> attachment, some not. I guess these have been filtered by other
> systems. On my dial up connection this is a
Hi Gerrit,
@12-Oct-2003, 13:30 +0200 (12:30 UK time) Gerrit Kruijer [GK] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Barry:
GK> On Sun, 12 Oct 2003, at 12:00:01 [GMT +0100] (which was 13:00
GK> where I live) you wrote:
Barry>> Dear TB Users
...
Barry>> deleting stuff I actually want. :o)
GK> Maybe y
Hi Barry,
On Sun, 12 Oct 2003, at 12:00:01 [GMT +0100] (which was 13:00 where I
live) you wrote:
Barry> Dear TB Users
Barry> This blasted Swen virus is getting me down.
Barry> Every day I am getting about 150 Swen emails, some with the
Barry> attachment, some not. I
Dear TB Users
This blasted Swen virus is getting me down.
Every day I am getting about 150 Swen emails, some with the
attachment, some not. I guess these have been filtered by other
systems. On my dial up connection this is a real pain when faced
with a session download
On Thursday, September 11, 2003, Pixie wrote...
JA>> I don't use my comcast account for emails, I run my own server,
JA>> so it's easier to monkey with what I want. There is a possibility
JA>> that it
> Do you happen to run that on a 'home' service? I've been thinking of
> throwing a server back
Hallo Pixie,
On Wed, 10 Sep 2003 06:56:57 -0400GMT (10-9-03, 12:56 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
MW>> Anyway, in digest mode the header on my message looks fine to me.
P> Does there happen to exist a command I can grab digests for the
P> last day or two?
Not automatically. But you could ask
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday, September 09, 2003, Pixie wrote...
> ..just trying to see if my ISP has been monkeying with something on
> their servers or if others on the list are also seeing the same.
I don't use my comcast account for emails, I run my own server, so
Wednesday, September 10, 2003, 1:27:47 AM, Pixie wrote:
P> about an hour or so ago a couple messages came in with this modified
P> subject. Not just the thread I ripped the subject from but also 1
P> or 2 others has it.
P> ..just trying to see if my ISP has been monkeying with something on
P> th
Pixie-
Cool. I sneaked in under your virus check software? Got my mojo
working today...
Anyway, in digest mode the header on my message looks fine to me.
--
-Mark Wieder
Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2
Hi:
I have a problem with virus protection. I have a PC with Windows XP,
The Bat v1.62r and Kaspersky Antivirus v4.0
I have an account with user rights and when I try to send a mail
or open an attachment a message box appear with the message "The
anti-virus has reported an error, the file c
ally use the HAWK feature of McAfee to scan e-mails. And, if
McAfee found a virus by scanning the temp files, then sure it would be
unwise to exclude them. I didn't have a problem with them, so I never
excluded them in McAfee.
--
Best regards,
Daniel
_
Hi Daniel
D>Which version of McAfee Virus Scan are you using?
6.02.3000.1
Thanks for the info. I've found the message on my server and deleted
it.
Won't excluding the bat*.temp files within McAffee cause an infection
if I do receive dodgy
I had the same thing happen recently, and it turned out to be
explorer.exe, a virus thingie that resides in the Windows Fonts
directory. You can read about it in the various online virus
files. AVG detected and healed two virus thingies that apparently
sprang from explorer.exe and were in my Win32
, I received a msg saying that my computer had a
virus and that I should run AVG. Which I did. However, I was
never given the opportunity to put the infected file in the
vault, or to disinfect it. AVG continued to tell me my
computer was infected. But could do nothing about it.
Do you think that
Hello Dajabo,
Tuesday, June 10, 2003, 5:41:30 AM, you wrote:
D> First Post to TBUDL ... hello all
D> Receiving McCaffee Virus Scan Warning about:
D> Exploit-MIME.gen.exe
D> whenever TB! checks for new mail.
D> The troublesome files are the TEMP files (eg bat96A.tmp) in the Te
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Dajabo,
@10-Jun-2003, 09:41 Dajabo [D] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said::
D> First Post to TBUDL ... hello all
Welcome.
D> Receiving McCaffee Virus Scan Warning about:
D> Exploit-MIME.gen.exe
D> whenever TB! checks for new m
First Post to TBUDL ... hello all
Receiving McCaffee Virus Scan Warning about:
Exploit-MIME.gen.exe
whenever TB! checks for new mail.
The troublesome files are the TEMP files (eg bat96A.tmp) in the Temp
folder in Local Settings.
How do I avoid these messages, and what are these temp files
an find the same information at McAfee and Norton.
Also, after reviewing the documentation on the virus, TB files can be
used to read e-mail addresses(at least with 1.62), since the file is a
simple text file and can be read easily. Also, since the virus has 2
methods to propagate itself(network and
On Friday, June 6, 2003, 18:04:54, Dave Kennedy wrote:
> Yes. My point, not very clearly made, is that TB! has apparently
> gotten enough "market-share" to be specifically targeted by virus
> writers.
We should be flattered ;)
Roman
--
Roman Katzer, Aachen, Germany
It'
Hello!
Fri Jun 6 2003 20:04:54 Dave Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
DK> Yes. My point, not very clearly made, is that TB! has apparently
DK> gotten enough "market-share" to be specifically targeted by virus
DK> writers.
I'm afraid you're wrong here. In th
Friday, June 6, 2003, 12:50:15 PM, Julien wrote:
J> Not necessarily. Reading at:
J>http://www.secuser.com/alertes/2003/bugbearb.htm
J> I saw: .TBB was referring to "Windows Office Toolbar Button".
J> It seems that hackers don't dare attacking The Bat! :-)
Possible, but I doubt that t
Hy all,
DK> Yes. My point, not very clearly made, is that TB! has apparently
DK> gotten enough "market-share" to be specifically targeted by virus
DK> writers.
Not necessarily. Reading at:
http://www.secuser.com/alertes/2003/bugbearb.htm
I saw: .TBB was referring
Hello neurowerx,
On Fri, 6 Jun 2003, at 16:35:27 [GMT +0200] (which was 15:35 in my
TimeZone) you wrote:
nwd> 06-Jun-2003 16:16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Mass-mailing routine
>> When the mass-mailing routine runs, it does the following:
>> Searches for the email addresses in the c
u still have to manually "install" the worm on your system.
n> :-)
Yes. My point, not very clearly made, is that TB! has apparently
gotten enough "market-share" to be specifically targeted by virus
writers.
--
Dave Kennedy
_
06-Jun-2003 16:16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Mass-mailing routine
> When the mass-mailing routine runs, it does the following:
> Searches for the email addresses in the current Inbox, as well as
> in the files with the following extensions:
> Notice the inclusion of .tbb in the list.
Y
I was looking at the information about the [EMAIL PROTECTED] virus
and saw the following on Symantec's site:
Mass-mailing routine
When the mass-mailing routine runs, it does the following:
Searches for the email addresses in the current Inbox, as well as
in the files with the foll
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Saturday, March 22, 2003
4:11:33 PM (GMT -05:00)
RE: "Computer freezing (and [probably [OT] virus removal)"
Greetings Allie,
On Saturday, March 22, 2003, 3:18:01 PM, you wrote:
AM> Don't forget to do a manually create a new r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dg Raftery Sr. [DRS] wrote:
DRS> Open up your control panel and turn off system restore. Reboot,
DRS> scan with your Antivirus program and it should eradicate the
DRS> problem in the system restore folder. Reboot and turn system
DRS> restore back on.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Saturday, March 22, 2003
1:18:51 PM (GMT -05:00)
RE: "Computer freezing (and [probably [OT] virus removal)"
Greetings Tim,
On Thursday, March 20, 2003, 10:53:28 PM, you wrote:
T> Probably unrelated and off-topic: whenever I leave my c
Tim-
Also, there was a thread about WinXP, the restore directory, and false
positives from virus scanners recently:
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
and
http://service4.symantec.com/SUPPORT/tsgeninfo.nsf/docid/200912274039
-Mark Wieder
Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195
Hi Tim,
Friday, March 21, 2003, 3:53:28 AM, you wrote:
T> I'm using Win XP Home, NTFS partitions, ZoneAlarm Pro 3.0.118. MY
T> high-traffic folders are compressed on exit; other folders are
T> compressed about once a month.
And there is your problem: Zone Alarm Pro. I would, in the past, have
r
ping for a new hard disk?
Probably unrelated and off-topic: whenever I leave my computer for a
while, when I return there is an alert that a virus (Gibe.B) has been
found in C:\System Volume Information\_restore {garbage stuff} and
that I should run AVG to remove it. But AVG with the latest update
tel
Joseph-
Thanks. I was going to add that, too, but forgot about it in the
process of writing the other points. It's very easy to add something
to a tagline signature...
-
This message has been checked by my superduper virus checke
er's footer that s/he has scanned the message
or attachments and that they are virus-free is, to me, meaningless.
It's nothing I would rely on, whether I knew the sender or not.
--
JN
Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" in
Basically what Allie said here. Not that I can resist adding my own
two cents...
IMNSHO scanning outgoing email is a useless function.
Here's the reasoning:
1. If your virus scanner is doing its job (and you have it enabled to
check incoming emails as well as doing realtime checking whe
Hi Jeanny,
Tuesday, January 28, 2003, 3:19:03 AM, you wrote:
JH> I know that everyone says that The Bat! is essentially virus-proof. I
JH> still have NAV scan everything that comes in. Is it necessary to have
JH> it scan outgoing mail, too? That seems to take quite a bit longer.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Jeanny House [JH] wrote:'
JH> I know that everyone says that The Bat! is essentially virus-proof.
JH> I still have NAV scan everything that comes in. Is it necessary to
JH>
I know that everyone says that The Bat! is essentially virus-proof. I
still have NAV scan everything that comes in. Is it necessary to have
it scan outgoing mail, too? That seems to take quite a bit longer.
Thanks,
Jeanny
--
Jeanny House
Eau Claire, WI
Using v. 1.62 Christmas
Windows XP Pro
, 6:58:20 PM, you wrote:
>> What Virus Plug-in do you all recommend for use with the Bat?
3> I used the following software in the past 2 years, each of it for a
3> longer period of time, all full versions:
3> G Data Antiviren Kit 11
3> Great software, test winner in c't
Wednesday, January 15, 2003, 6:58:20 PM, you wrote:
> What Virus Plug-in do you all recommend for use with the Bat?
I used the following software in the past 2 years, each of it for a
longer period of time, all full versions:
G Data Antiviren Kit 11
Great software, test winner in c&#x
. 703.606.2379
NATCA National Communications Chairman
NatcaNet Administrator
Wednesday, January 15, 2003, 7:52:57 PM, you wrote:
> Can I just ask - what surprises me in what you have said is that you
> don't have a sheep dip server dealing with the mail first? That would
> enable al
e and the other as a web server.
Can I just ask - what surprises me in what you have said is that you
don't have a sheep dip server dealing with the mail first? That would
enable all virus loaded files to remain on that computer and only
notifications to be sent to the Postmaster.
--
Best
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Timothy,
@15-Jan-2003, 12:58 -0500 (17:58 UK time) Timothy Casten [TC] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
TC> What Virus Plug-in do you all recommend for use with the Bat?
I use AVG. I recommend NOD32 and Kaspersky(?
I have tried NAV 2002 and 2003 and have a problem with timeouts due to its e-mail
scanning.
The problem is that I maintain both of NATCAS big Internet servers.
One we use as a e-mail server running mailsite and the other as a web server.
We use sieve filters for virus protection in the e-mail
Hello Timothy,
Wednesday, January 15, 2003, 5:58:20 PM, you wrote:
TC> What Virus Plug-in do you all recommend for use with the Bat?
Personally, Norton but YMMV. :)
--
Best regards,
Mike
Current version
TC> What Virus Plug-in do you all recommend for use with the Bat?
NAV 2003 works great with TB!
Go NATCA!!! (ZSU)
--
Ramon L. Negron (Cuco)
Air Traffic Controllers tell pilots where to go!
PATCO Lives!
Current version is 1.62 | &qu
What Virus Plug-in do you all recommend for use with the Bat?
--
Happy New Year,
Timbo
Timothy Casten mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ZDC Area 5 Rep. 703.606.2379
NATCA National Communications Chairman
NatcaNet Administrator
Current version
In the free (for personal use) anti-trojan category, Backwork:
http://www.framework.nl/backwork/eng/index.html
M.
Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Have deleted and lost the query from a French site about how to use
SpyBot to fix selected problems after they have been found.
This may help:
Along the second line from the bottom, you have clicked on Check for Problems.
On the far right of this, you click on Fix Selected Problems. This will fi
Hello M.,
Monday, January 13, 2003, 1:35:22 AM, you wrote:
ME> Granville,
ME> Spybot is a slightly different program than anti-virus or anti-trojan
ME> though similarities exist. Spybots act a lot like trojans, but are
ME> generally not as malicious. It's good to have all thr
Granville,
It's an easy program to use and the interface is clean. File/Check for
Problems scans your PC, and produces a list of problems. You can check
which ones you want fixed. Then, lower right, "Fix Selected Problems."
That's it.
Spybot is a slightly different progra
into his system.
I have installed and run Spybot on my computer. Does this mean that I
do not need another Trojan Scanner such as Truscan. I am already using
AVG Anti-Virus software.
--
Love and Light,
Granvillemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
Hello Clive,
Sunday, January 12, 2003, 8:27:13 AM, you wrote:
CT> Hello M.
ME>> The over 4,000 database entries and almost daily updates. The free
ME>> price, lovely interface, online updates, and extra features (file
ME>> shredding, track erasing). Plus, recommendations from SpywareInfo.com.
Hello M.
ME> The over 4,000 database entries and almost daily updates. The free
ME> price, lovely interface, online updates, and extra features (file
ME> shredding, track erasing). Plus, recommendations from SpywareInfo.com.
OK, I agree ;). I've had a good look at the prog now and it seems
worth
Clive,
http://spybot.eon.net.au/
> What is your basis for saying that this piece of software is "very
> good"?
The over 4,000 database entries and almost daily updates. The free
price, lovely interface, online updates, and extra features (file
shredding, track erasing). Plus, recommendations fro
Mike,
> As far as AVG goes, let's just say I worked for a gov't dept ...
> The only ones to come through with a clean bill
> of health (i.e. for the large majority of the tests they had a 100%
> record) were Symantec and Sophos.
Are they free for personal use, or offer a Bat plugin? No program is
Hello M.
ME> A very good *free* anti-trojan/spyware/adware/virus tool is
ME> http://spybot.eon.net.au/
What is your basis for saying that this piece of software is "very
good"?
--
Clive Taylor
Using The Bat! v1.62 Last Ch
gt; sure AVG is not the Bees Knees when it comes to protecting your
GC> computer from these infections?
Tauscan wouldn't find any viruses. It only scans for Trojans. There is
a difference between viruses, worms and Trojans. You need a virus
scanner and a Trojan scanner (the AV should catch
A very good *free* anti-trojan/spyware/adware/virus tool is
http://spybot.eon.net.au/
Has many languages, frequent database updates, online update system,
rollback support to un-do system changes, many industry awards. (Be
careful with the registry features.)
A similar free program, less capable
Hello Mike,
Friday, January 10, 2003, 1:40:24 AM, you wrote:
MA> Hello Oliver,
MA> First I digress. For anyone who replied to anything I said in the last
MA> week or so, sorry if I haven't replied. I wasn't around and when I
MA> got back the posts were so long I just ctrl-m'ed ;-)
MA> Thursday
; account because of this. If you have
> commportreg32.exe in your list of running
> processes you are infected by this trojan.
> Since yesterday I use Kaspersky, The Bat! has a
> built-in plugin for this virus scanner. The only
> strange thing is that it doesn't tell me if I
> receive
Hello Oliver,
First I digress. For anyone who replied to anything I said in the last
week or so, sorry if I haven't replied. I wasn't around and when I
got back the posts were so long I just ctrl-m'ed ;-)
Thursday, January 9, 2003, 12:19:20 PM, you wrote:
OA> Hello Maurice,
OA> This is maybe a
301 - 400 of 1143 matches
Mail list logo
