Re: Displaying Digest results in line

2000-01-30 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
Hi Tom, On 30 January 2000 at 16:44:14 GMT -0800 (which was 00:44 where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points: TP if you could have the program explode them for you, it would help. Agreed. The perfect solution IMHO. (Although I'm not certain that Alex would be content with

Re: Displaying Digest results in line

2000-01-30 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
Hi Allie, On 30 January 2000 at 20:08:16 GMT -0500 (which was 01:08 where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points: AM On Sat, 29 Jan 2000 23:50:52 +, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote: This request is for *less* discrimination of digests than TB is giving right now - to

MIME forwarding multiple messages (was:Re: Displaying Digest results in line)

2000-01-30 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hallo Allie, On Sun, 30 Jan 2000 02:10:08 -0500 GMT (30.01.2000, 15:10 +0800 GMT), Allie Martin wrote: Excuse my asking, but is it possible with TB to send multiple different messages as MIME attachments of the same message? I'd be interested to learn how to do that. AM Yes. Just

Re: Displaying Digest results in line

2000-01-30 Thread Allie Martin
On Sun, 30 Jan 2000 09:52:16 +, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote: Are you sure about that? Here is the original question again: I am switching from Eudora to The Bat. I receive a php mailinglist in digest form. It displayed in the message in Eudora, but in The Bat it is displaying as a series

Re: MIME forwarding multiple messages (was:Re: Displaying Digest results in line)

2000-01-30 Thread Allie Martin
On Sun, 30 Jan 2000 16:22:47 +0800, Thomas Fernandez wrote: Thanks, works. :-) How do I attach messages from different folders? You may only choose messages from a single folder at a time, so if you wish to MIME forward messages from multiple folders then move them to a common

Filter Help.

2000-01-30 Thread Shanmugam Ganeshkumar
HI TB Users, I flashed one request sometimes back and go no answers so I'm posting it again. The problem is serious and I just couldn't solve it. Whenever I create a filter and close the program the filter goes away. I have tried all the setting and all seems to be ok. Can someone tell me

Re: Displaying Digest results in line

2000-01-30 Thread Alexander V. Kiselev
Hi there! On 30 Jan 00, at 9:33, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote about "Re: Displaying Digest results in li": TP if you could have the program explode them for you, it would help. Agreed. The perfect solution IMHO. (Although I'm not certain that Alex would be content with it). Well, in a

Re: Displaying Digest results in line

2000-01-30 Thread Alexander V. Kiselev
Hi there! On 30 Jan 00, at 9:44, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote about "Re: Displaying Digest results in li": AVK Note, that MIME digest might contain MIME digests, which can AVK contain MIME digests, etc., etc. This is a *major* problem if AVK your idea gets accepted by the

Re: MIME forwarding multiple messages (was:Re: Displaying Digest results in line)

2000-01-30 Thread Alexander V. Kiselev
Hi there! On 30 Jan 00, at 16:22, Thomas Fernandez wrote about "MIME forwarding multiple messages": AM Yes. Just select all the messages that you wish to MIME AM forward and then hit the forward button. All the messages will be AM attached. And BTW, at this point you can force

(No Subject)

2000-01-30 Thread Marilyn H. Pukmel
Hello TBUDL, "Mail from this mailing list will now be provided to you in digest form if the list administrator has enabled digest support." When I requested to get the digest form the above sentence was in the confirmation message. Who is the administrator? Me? I am the sole user. If so how do I

Digest set-up

2000-01-30 Thread Marilyn H. Pukmel
Hello TBUDL , "Mail from this mailing list will now be provided to you in digest form if the list administrator has enabled digest support." When I requested to get the digest form the above sentence was in the confirmation message. Who is the administrator? Me? I am the sole user. If so how do

Re: (No Subject)

2000-01-30 Thread Allie Martin
On Sun, 30 Jan 2000 09:43:22 -0500, Marilyn H. Pukmel wrote: [..snip..] I seem to be getting the digest OK but I don't seem to understand what to do if I want to reply to an individual's message in the . digest. I have looked for an answer in the on-line help file but cannot seem to find

Re: Digest set-up

2000-01-30 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hallo Marilyn, On Sun, 30 Jan 2000 09:47:28 -0500 GMT (30.01.2000, 22:47 +0800 GMT), Marilyn H. Pukmel wrote: MHP When I requested to get the digest form the above sentence was in MHP the confirmation message. Who is the administrator? Me? To reach the administrator, see the rfc822 headers on

Re: Filter Help.

2000-01-30 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hallo Shanmugam, On Sun, 30 Jan 2000 21:05:43 +0700 (GMT+0700) GMT (30.01.2000, 22:05 +0800 GMT), Shanmugam Ganeshkumar wrote: SG Whenever I create a filter and close the program the filter goes away. I SG have tried all the setting and all seems to be ok. I cannot help you, because the

Re: Filter Help.

2000-01-30 Thread Allie Martin
On Sun, 30 Jan 2000 23:30:28 +0800, Thomas Fernandez wrote: SG Whenever I create a filter and close the program the filter goes SG away. I have tried all the setting and all seems to be ok. I cannot help you, because the problem does not exist here. Sorry. I don't have the problem

Re: Signature Thing Frustration

2000-01-30 Thread Paula Ford
On Saturday, January 29, 2000, Jast wrote: Morning Paula Ford, Why can't I get my signature to cut at the -- in replies the way it should? It works here specifically for that case. If you select the characters below you will notice one of them does indeed have a space after them,

Show from during download

2000-01-30 Thread Clemens 'Gullevek' Schwaighofer
Hello The Bat! ML, Especially when I get very big mails (2MB) I'd like to know, who is the sender. So is it possible to show from during download. Cause it is in the header, it is the first thing to be downloaded and it might be nice, if TheBat would show this during download, so I might

Re[2]: Signature Thing Frustration

2000-01-30 Thread Chuck Mattsen
On Saturday, January 29, 2000 at 11:46 AM or thereabouts, Paula Ford wrote the following about Signature Thing Frustration: Paula Yes, this one is working, but the space _does_ disappear under Paula some circumstances whether I'm putting it into a template or Paula not. I haven't figured out why

Re: Signature Thing Frustration

2000-01-30 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hallo Paula, On Sat, 29 Jan 2000 12:46:01 -0500 GMT (30.01.2000, 01:46 +0800 GMT), Paula Ford wrote: PF Yes, this one is working, but the space _does_ disappear under some PF circumstances whether I'm putting it into a template or not. I haven't PF figured out why though. When you move the

Re: Show from during download

2000-01-30 Thread Mark Aston
Hi Clemens, Sunday, January 30, 2000, 4:55:36 PM, you wrote: CGS Especially when I get very big mails (2MB) I'd like to know, who is CGS the sender. So is it possible to show from during download. Cause it CGS is in the header, it is the first thing to be downloaded and it might CGS be

Re: Signature Thing Frustration

2000-01-30 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hallo Chuck, On Sun, 30 Jan 2000 11:08:50 -0600 GMT (31.01.2000, 01:08 +0800 GMT), Chuck Mattsen wrote: CM My first clue is usually when some "helpful" person on this list CM emails me to tell me it's not working ... some people spend a lot of CM time watching for that, apparently. :-) Myself,

Re[2]: Signature Thing Frustration

2000-01-30 Thread Chuck Mattsen
On Sunday, January 30, 2000 at 11:15 AM or thereabouts, Thomas Fernandez wrote the following about Signature Thing Frustration: Thomas You have life? - I have a computer. ;-) A meager semblance of one, barely ... would you believe I live in a one-room, studio apartment and just the other day I

Re[3]: Signature Thing Frustration

2000-01-30 Thread Gary
Hi Chuck, On Sunday, January 30, 2000, 11:41:35 AM, you hammered out: C On Sunday, January 30, 2000 at 11:15 AM or thereabouts, Thomas C Fernandez wrote the following about Signature Thing Frustration: Thomas You have life? - I have a computer. ;-) C A meager semblance of one, barely ...

Re: Show from during download

2000-01-30 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hallo Gary, On Sun, 30 Jan 2000 11:43:20 -0600 GMT (31.01.2000, 01:43 +0800 GMT), Gary wrote: G Is that what "dispatch mail on server" means? It deletes mail left on G server? Help files are sketchy in this area. Have never tried this G function yet. Try it. You can delete, mark as

Re: Displaying Digest results in line

2000-01-30 Thread Alexander V. Kiselev
Hi there! On 30 Jan 00, at 23:17, Thomas Fernandez wrote about "Re: Displaying Digest results in li": AVK See my other message in the same thread. Anyhow, *when* writing plugins AVK becomes possible (BTW, anybody knows, WHEN?;-)), it will become a AVK breeze to correct all this;-)

Re: Signature Thing Frustration

2000-01-30 Thread Allie Martin
On Sun, 30 Jan 2000 11:08:50 -0600, Chuck Mattsen wrote: My first clue is usually when some "helpful" person on this list emails me to tell me it's not working ... some people spend a lot of time watching for that, apparently. :-) The smiley didn't work there actually. When the sig

Re[2]: Signature Thing Frustration

2000-01-30 Thread Chuck Mattsen
On Sunday, January 30, 2000 at 2:19 PM or thereabouts, Allie Martin wrote the following about Signature Thing Frustration: Allie On Sun, 30 Jan 2000 11:08:50 -0600, Chuck Mattsen wrote: My first clue is usually when some "helpful" person on this list emails me to tell me it's not working ...

Re[3]: Signature Thing Frustration

2000-01-30 Thread Gary
Hi Chuck, On Sunday, January 30, 2000, 2:31:45 PM, you hammered out: C Here in Minnesota, the home of the "Ice Thing" as Gary puts it g, we C don't sweat the small stuff ... or any stuff, for that matter ... in C January. I don't see how you can sweat anything in Minnesota in January !

Re[4]: Signature Thing Frustration

2000-01-30 Thread Chuck Mattsen
On Sunday, January 30, 2000 at 2:40 PM or thereabouts, Gary wrote the following about Signature Thing Frustration: Gary On Sunday, January 30, 2000, 2:31:45 PM, you hammered out: C Here in Minnesota, the home of the "Ice Thing" as Gary puts it C g, we don't sweat the small stuff ... or any

Re: HTML

2000-01-30 Thread Gary
Hi dMb, On Sunday, January 30, 2000, 3:26:08 PM, you hammered out: d But...what I can't figure out is if it's possible to do this within d TB. d Could someone clue me in? I just looked at the various options both d in the main program, and from within the editor, and I couldn't find d

Re: Signature Thing Frustration

2000-01-30 Thread Alexander V. Kiselev
Hi there! On 30 Jan 00, at 14:31, Chuck Mattsen wrote about "Re[2]: Signature Thing Frustration": Here in Minnesota, the home of the "Ice Thing" as Gary puts it g, we don't sweat the small stuff ... or any stuff, for that matter ... in January. Care to explain all that to non-Americans?

Re[3]: Signature Thing Frustration

2000-01-30 Thread John De Hoog
Chuck Mattsen wrote... CM My first clue is usually when some "helpful" person on this list CM emails me to tell me it's not working ... some people spend a lot CM of time watching for that, apparently. :-) Myself, I have other CM hobbies. Yes, I got one of those mails too. Interestingly, not

Re[2]: HTML

2000-01-30 Thread Chuck Mattsen
On Sunday, January 30, 2000 at 3:39 PM or thereabouts, Gary wrote the following about HTML: Gary I have been playing with this too. The only way I have come Gary across, (spent very little time on this project yet) is to make Gary a document, let's say in Word or WordPerfect, save it in HTML

Re: Digest Set-up

2000-01-30 Thread Marilyn H. Pukmel
Hello list, Sunday, January 30, 2000, 11:57:04 AM, you wrote: lmtdc Sounds like you get all the message bodies placed together as lmtdc one long message, i.e., the simple digest format. The disadvantage of lmtdc this digest type is just what you're experiencing. Replying to an lmtdc individual

Re: HTML

2000-01-30 Thread Alexander V. Kiselev
Hi there! On 30 Jan 00, at 16:26, dMb wrote about "HTML": Stupid question time: As much as I loathe HTML email messages, sometimes I find it necessary to generate a new message in that format (rather than plain text). Don't ask why. But...what I can't figure out is if it's

Re[2]: Signature Thing Frustration

2000-01-30 Thread Gary
Hi Alex, On Sunday, January 30, 2000, 3:41:05 PM, you hammered out: Here in Minnesota, the home of the "Ice Thing" as Gary puts it g, we don't sweat the small stuff ... or any stuff, for that matter ... in January. A Care to explain all that to non-Americans? Or are you going to chat just

Re[3]: HTML

2000-01-30 Thread dMb
Gary I have been playing with this too. The only way I have come Gary across, (spent very little time on this project yet) is to make Gary a document, let's say in Word or WordPerfect, save it in HTML Gary format, and then send it as a MIME attachment. Chuck wrote: That *does* work rather well

Re: HTML

2000-01-30 Thread Alexander V. Kiselev
Hi there! On 30 Jan 00, at 15:49, Chuck Mattsen wrote about "Re[2]: HTML": That *does* work rather well ... just did a short test to myself, and it came through nicely except, of course, for the graphics referenced in the HTML which are stored in my FTP directory ... if we wanted to

Re: Signature Thing Frustration

2000-01-30 Thread Alexander V. Kiselev
Hi there! On 31 Jan 00, at 6:45, John De Hoog wrote about "Re[3]: Signature Thing Frustration": Yes, I got one of those mails too. Interestingly, not everyone thinks the sig-dash standard is a good thing. When it was introduced to Datula, a Japanese mailer, the regulars on the

Re: Signature Thing Frustration

2000-01-30 Thread Alexander V. Kiselev
Hi there! On 30 Jan 00, at 15:59, Gary wrote about "Re[2]: Signature Thing Frustration": A Care to explain all that to non-Americans? Or are you going to chat just A between yourselves? Sorry Alex, I will let Chuck go into detail if he wishes, but the largest (twin) cities in

Re[2]: HTML

2000-01-30 Thread Chuck Mattsen
On Sunday, January 30, 2000 at 4:00 PM or thereabouts, Alexander V. Kiselev wrote the following about HTML: Alexander Attach your images to the same message, too. Hrefs should Alexander be stated this way: Alexander img src="whatever.jpg" width=200 height=114 border=0 Alexander

Re: HTML

2000-01-30 Thread Alexander V. Kiselev
Hi there! On 30 Jan 00, at 16:34, Chuck Mattsen wrote about "Re[2]: HTML": Alexander Attach your images to the same message, too. Hrefs should Alexander be stated this way: Alexander img src="whatever.jpg" width=200 height=114 border=0 Alexander title="Whichever" Alexander

Re: Signature Thing Frustration

2000-01-30 Thread Tom Plunket
Here in Minnesota, the home of the "Ice Thing" as Gary puts it g, we don't sweat the small stuff ... or any stuff, for that matter ... in January. AVK Care to explain all that to non-Americans? Or are you going to chat just AVK between yourselves? Heh, I live in the US, too, and have lived

Re: Signature Thing Frustration

2000-01-30 Thread Peter Steiner
On Mon, 31 Jan 2000 00:41:05 +0300, Alexander V. Kiselev wrote: P.S. For all of you struggling with the sig delimiters, proper improper ones: why the hell not write a *simple* regexp instead of relying on TB's built-in sig- stripping capabilities? This way one can catch not only the "proper"

Re[3]: Signature Thing Frustration

2000-01-30 Thread tracer
Hello Chuck Mattsen, On GMT your local time, which was Monday, January 31, 2000, 12:41:35 AM (GMT+0700) my local time, Chuck Mattsen wrote: On Sunday, January 30, 2000 at 11:15 AM or thereabouts, Thomas Fernandez wrote the following about Signature Thing Frustration: Thomas You have life? -

Re: HTML

2000-01-30 Thread tracer
Hello dMb, On GMT your local time, which was Monday, January 31, 2000, 4:26:08 AM (GMT+0700) my local time, dMb wrote: Stupid question time: As much as I loathe HTML email messages, sometimes I find it necessary to generate a new message in that format (rather than plain text). Don't ask

Re[3]: HTML

2000-01-30 Thread tracer
Hello Chuck Mattsen, On GMT your local time, which was Monday, January 31, 2000, 4:49:07 AM (GMT+0700) my local time, Chuck Mattsen wrote: That *does* work rather well ... just did a short test to myself, and it came through nicely except, of course, for the graphics referenced in the HTML

Re[3]: HTML

2000-01-30 Thread Gary
Hi Chuck, On Sunday, January 30, 2000, 3:49:07 PM, you hammered out: Gary I have been playing with this too. The only way I have come Gary across, (spent very little time on this project yet) is to make Gary a document, let's say in Word or WordPerfect, save it in HTML Gary format, and then

Re[4]: HTML

2000-01-30 Thread tracer
Hello dMb, On GMT your local time, which was Monday, January 31, 2000, 5:04:18 AM (GMT+0700) my local time, dMb wrote: Therefore, I thought of doing an HTML message with the pictures included, except that I'm back to where I started. Do it in pagemaker?? Asuming they can see the result?

Re[2]: Signature Thing Frustration

2000-01-30 Thread tracer
Hello Tom Plunket, On GMT your local time, which was Monday, January 31, 2000, 6:00:03 AM (GMT+0700) my local time, Tom Plunket wrote: -20 is too cold for me too, that's one reason I left Vermont. Now I still have snow on the ground, but I'm in the desert so it's warm-cold. ;) Whats

Re: Digest Set-up

2000-01-30 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
Hi Allie, On 30 January 2000 at 17:03:25 GMT -0500 (which was 22:03 where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points: If you had it MIME digest format, then each message would be separate and then you would simply hit the reply button for the message you wish to reply

Automatic option to not download but leave on server

2000-01-30 Thread Doc Wonmug
Hello, Batmen and women, One option I use frequently in Datula and EdMax is to leave certain messages on the server without downloading them, so I can download them from a different location later. For example, I don't want to read all the messages for the Datula and EdMax lists while

Re: Automatic option to not download but leave on server

2000-01-30 Thread Januk Aggarwal
Hello Doc, On Sunday, January 30, 2000 at 09:41:39 GMT +0900 (which was 4:41 PM where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: Hello, Batmen and women, I'd like to do the same thing in The Bat!, but this feature appears to be missing. Is it? (I know I can do it with the dispatcher, but I

Re: Signature Thing Frustration

2000-01-30 Thread Allie Martin
On Mon, 31 Jan 2000 03:46:40 +0300, Alexander V. Kiselev wrote: %REGEXPQUOTES="(?s)(.*?)(^(-\s)?--(\s)?\n|^(-\s)?---(\s)?\n|\Z)" And so on;-) OK, it works now. Very well at that. :) For those interested if you wish to have the signature delimiter that's not confined to simply

Re: Signature Thing Frustration

2000-01-30 Thread Alexander V. Kiselev
Hi there! On 31 Jan 00, at 0:18, Peter Steiner wrote about "Re: Signature Thing Frustration": P.S. For all of you struggling with the sig delimiters, proper improper ones: why the hell not write a *simple* regexp instead of relying on TB's built-in sig- stripping capabilities? This

Re: Signature Thing Frustration

2000-01-30 Thread Allie Martin
On Sun, 30 Jan 2000 15:02:02 -0800, Tom Plunket wrote: I pick and choose what I delete, but I do start with everything quoted. Just means less to delete for me, and in the end it really doesn't matter that much since a few more shift-arrow presses aren't a terrible thing... Think

Re: Test message

2000-01-30 Thread Syafril Hermansyah
Hello Tom Plunket, On Saturday, January 29, 2000 at 10:57:13 GMT -0800 (which was 31/01/2000 1:57 GMT + 0700 my Local Time) you told to the list: Forgive me for the this test message. AVK List--Help: mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] AVK Syafril! It works, except for list-help. Apparently

Re: Test message

2000-01-30 Thread Syafril Hermansyah
Hello Alexander V. Kiselev, On Friday, January 28, 2000 at 19:33:20 GMT +0300 (which was 31/01/2000 23:33 GMT + 0700 my Local Time) you told to the list: Forgive me for the this test message. AVK List--Help: mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] AVK Syafril! It works, except for list-help.

Re: Test message

2000-01-30 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
Hi Syafril, On 31 January 2000 at 08:29:07 GMT +0700 (which was 01:29 where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points: TP Also, if you're trying to make a mailto: URL you need to lose the TP space. Some of the headers had 'em, others didn't... SH Sorry for my lack of

Re: Automatic option to not download but leave on server

2000-01-30 Thread Doc Wonmug
Januk Aggarwal wrote... The Bat downloads the messages first, then it applies the appropriate filter sets, so what you request can't be done exactly the way you describe. But there is a work around that might do what you need. I already have separate folders for messages from the developer and

Re: Automatic option to not download but leave on server

2000-01-30 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
Hi Januk, On 31 January 2000 at 16:53:50 GMT -0800 (which was 00:53 where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points: I'd like to do the same thing in The Bat!, but this feature appears to be missing. Is it? (I know I can do it with the dispatcher, but I want

OT: TB v2 and Xanadu (was:Re: Displaying Digest results in line)

2000-01-30 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hi Alexander, On Sun, 30 Jan 2000 21:48:28 +0300GMT (31/01/2000, 02:48 +0800GMT), Alexander V. Kiselev wrote: In version 2 ;-) AVK This answer is not an answer at all... I didn't ask "where", I did ask "when";-) That's what I answered, too. Have you ever heard of Project Xanadu? since

Re: Automatic option to not download but leave on server

2000-01-30 Thread Januk Aggarwal
Hello Doc, On Sunday, January 30, 2000 at 11:02:47 GMT +0900 (which was 6:02 PM where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: Januk Aggarwal wrote... The Bat downloads the messages first, then it applies the appropriate filter sets, so what you request can't be done exactly the way you

Re: Signature Thing Frustration

2000-01-30 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hi John, On Mon, 31 Jan 2000 06:45:44 +0900GMT (31/01/2000, 05:45 +0800GMT), John De Hoog wrote: JDH I'm not opposed to it myself, but if The Bat! is not going to make JDH it easy for me to use it, I'm not going to waste more time than it's JDH worth. Especially when we have the Select +

Re: Test message

2000-01-30 Thread Tom Plunket
JA As you can see from the above, there are spaces between mailto: and JA the address in some of the headers above. It doesn't matter yet JA since TB doesn't support those features in any advanced way, but if JA and when it does, this might present a problem. More to the point, the space

Re: Won't check for new messages (fixed!)

2000-01-30 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hi Tom, On Thu, 27 Jan 2000 21:39:11 -0800GMT (28/01/2000, 13:39 +0800GMT), Tom Plunket wrote: JA Actually this is problem that has been encountered before, but for JA some reason it never generated much useful discussion on the list. I JA guess not too many people can afford to leave their

Re: Test message

2000-01-30 Thread Syafril Hermansyah
Hello Januk Aggarwal, On Monday, January 31, 2000 at 17:43:58 GMT -0800 (which was 31/01/2000 8:43 GMT + 0700 my Local Time) you told to the list: [ ... ] List-Administrator: mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] JA ^^^ JA And the last one JA

Re: Filter Help.

2000-01-30 Thread Syafril Hermansyah
Hello Shanmugam Ganeshkumar, On Sunday, January 30, 2000 at 21:05:43 GMT +0700 (GMT+0700) (which was 31/01/2000 21:05 GMT + 0700 my Local Time) you told to the list: SG Whenever I create a filter and close the program the filter goes SG away. I have tried all the setting and all seems to

Re: RFC2369 (was:Re: Test message)

2000-01-30 Thread Syafril Hermansyah
Hello Steve Lamb, On Sunday, January 30, 2000 at 21:12:21 GMT -0800 (which was 31/01/2000 12:12 GMT + 0700 my Local Time) you told to the list: SL Why not both until that time? It is always good to have the machine SL readable information there. :P Wouldn't that be even more

Re: Datula

2000-01-30 Thread Keith Russell
Hello, fellow Bat-lovers. On Thursday, January 27, 2000, 2:56:11 PM, John wrote: JDH Keith wrote... KR On Thursday, 27 January, 2000, 7:35:11 AM, Mark wrote: Checked out Datula from the link on your site, very nice MUA, just need to learn Japanese now:-) Do you know if they plan an

Re: Won't check for new messages (fixed!)

2000-01-30 Thread John De Hoog
Tom Plunket wrote... Had it up for three days, no apparent problems. Didn't notice the slowdown, but that may have been there... Had to reboot my machine though since IE crashed it yesterday... :( It takes a real man to keep it up for three days. I managed to go for close to 36 hours, but

Re: Signature Thing Frustration

2000-01-30 Thread Tom Plunket
TP I pick and choose what I delete, but I do start with everything TP quoted. Just means less to delete for me, and in the end it TP really doesn't matter that much since a few more shift-arrow TP presses aren't a terrible thing... AM Think of it in cumulative terms then. ;) Small

Re: Signature Thing Frustration

2000-01-30 Thread Peter Steiner
Hello Alexander and TB! addicts On Mon, 31 Jan 2000 04:04:35 +0300, Alexander V. Kiselev wrote: ^^ Sleepless in St. Petersburg?? ;-) Ah, yeah, please excuse me, Peter, but I really have completely forgotten about that one of yours;-( You see, I'm not using TB right now

Re: Success with Japanese

2000-01-30 Thread Keith Russell
Hello, fellow Bat-lovers. On Saturday, January 29, 2000, 7:20:49 PM, John wrote: [snip] JDH To get the charset header, open the Xlat manager under Options, add an JDH entry for Korean, and put the char set in Character set name. Then JDH make Korean your default character set or the one you