Hello Quin,
Sunday, July 28, 2002, 10:43:34 PM, you wrote:
QS Hello tbudl,
QS Will someone walk me through the meaning of the checkbox called This account is
the
QS default for mailto:; URLs?
QS To simplify things, I have only two accounts at the moment. I've
QS tried checking the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Julius,
@29 July 2002, 23:42 -0400 (04:42 UK time) Julius S. [JS] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Dierk Haasis:
JS Could you please tell me more on how you use it? I still don't get
JS it.
,-=[ From the FAQ: ]=-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Dierk,
@29 July 2002, 07:59 +0200 (06:59 UK time) Dierk Haasis [DH] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck D Pearlstone:
DH snipped for brevity's and clarity's sake
DH Can anyone tell me - Marck, you, by any chance?! - what
Hi all,
I know that you can Reply to All for an email by clicking the
toolbar button with an envelope and 2 green arrows but is it possible
to select an option from the menu to do this?
Also, I would like it to appear as an option when you right click an
email.
Cheers,
--
Ben Kennish
[EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Ben,
@29 July 2002, 10:42 +0100 Ben Kennish [BK] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
BK I know that you can Reply to All for an email by clicking the
BK toolbar button with an envelope and 2 green arrows but is it
BK possible to
Hi Julius.
At 11:42 PM on Sunday, July 28, 2002 you wrote the following
about [SmartBat]:
JS Could you please tell me more on how you use it? I still
JS don't get it.
JS I have CLIPMATE which can copy anything onto the
JS clipboard, lets me edit and print or attach.
I find it useful for a
Hi Marck,
On Monday, July 29, 2002, 11:07:39 AM, you [MDP] wrote:
MDP -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
MDP Hash: SHA1
MDP Hi Ben,
MDP @29 July 2002, 10:42 +0100 Ben Kennish [BK] in
MDP [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
BK I know that you can Reply to All for an email by
Hi all,
I think it would be really cool if you could set the transparency of
the mail ticker.
I like to have it scrolling on the bottom of my screen (just above
Start Menu) but its annoying that when I have mail it covers up all
the status bar of maximised programs. A 25% transparency or so
Hello tbudl,
Please ignore, ,
--
Syafril
===
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current Ver: 1.61
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
SH Please ignore, ,
What's all that junk with test messages posted lately? Can't people send
a message to themselves or to a good buddy for test purposes?
Thanks
Bernd
Current Ver: 1.61
FAQ:
Hello tbudl,
Test # 2, please ignore, ,
--
Syafril
===
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current Ver: 1.61
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives :
SGVsbG8gdGJ1ZGwsDQoNClRlc3QgIzMsIHBsZWFzZSBpZ25vcmUg/Pz8/Cwg9vb29vb29vYNCg0K
LS0gDQpTeWFmcmlsDQo9PT09PT09DQptYWlsdG86c3lhZnJpbEBkdXRhaW50LmNvLmlk
Current Ver: 1.61
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL
On Mon, 29 Jul 2002 15:09:57 +0100 Bernd Gauweiler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
SH Please ignore, ,
What's all that junk with test messages posted lately? Can't people
send a message to themselves or to a good buddy for test purposes?
Sorry, I am too lazy to create new
SH Sorry, I am too lazy
I don't think you have a very strong argument here.
You're obviously not too lazy annoying everybody with your test
messages.
B
--
Current Ver: 1.61
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Unsubscribe:
You just ended up on a trash filter.
Hello Syafril
On Monday, July 29, 2002, you wrote
Sorry, I am too lazy to create new $listname which have actually same
setting as TBUDL has, no time for it... at least now :-)
Current Ver: 1.61
On Monday, July 29, 2002, 16:26, Bernd Gauweiler wrote:
I don't think you have a very strong argument here.
You're obviously not too lazy annoying everybody with your test
messages.
I think you are missunderstanding. As seen in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Syafril is not testing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Ben,
@29 July 2002, 14:56 +0100 Ben Kennish [BK] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck D Pearlstone:
BK Also, I would like it to appear as an option when you right click
BK an email.
MDP It does, if you Right Click on the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Bernd,
@29 July 2002, 15:26 +0100 Bernd Gauweiler [BG] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Syafril
Hermansyah:
BG I don't think you have a very strong argument here.
I disagree.
moderator
Strongly!
/moderator
BG You're
Hello Bernd,
On Mon, 29 Jul 2002 15:26:25 +0100 GMT (29/07/02, 21:26 +0700 GMT),
Bernd Gauweiler wrote:
BG I don't think you have a very strong argument here.
BG You're obviously not too lazy annoying everybody with your test
BG messages.
There is no need to get annoyed.
Syafril is the list
On Mon, 29 Jul 2002 15:26:25 +0100 Bernd Gauweiler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
SH Sorry, I am too lazy
I don't think you have a very strong argument here.
You're obviously not too lazy annoying everybody with your test
messages.
Really ?
I just want friends from Europe or anyone who use
BG I don't think you have a very strong argument here.
MDP I disagree.
Common sense, courtesy and good manners dictate, at least, to phrase
such message differently, including a brief (!) statement as to why such
test message is unavoidable.
I, for one, didn't realize the originator is the
Sorry, I am too lazy to create new $listname which have
actually same setting as TBUDL has, no time for it... at
least now :-)
WHAT!?! FUCK IT!!!
/ St
Current Ver: 1.61
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Unsubscribe:
WHAT!?! FUCK IT!!!
...St would like to disappear somewhere under the North Pole...
/ St
Current Ver: 1.61
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
On Mon, 29 Jul 2002 16:01:44 +0100 Bernd Gauweiler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
[ ...]
Even so, I still think any test message to the list is bad manners.
Then how did I know my changes being work ?
There is not a single day without 20-ish messages about spam
filtering. Presumably, because
On Mon, 29 Jul 2002 17:06:09 +0200 St - Musaic.Net [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Sorry, I am too lazy to create new $listname which have
actually same setting as TBUDL has, no time for it... at
least now :-)
WHAT!?! FUCK IT!!!
Do you want me to completely banned you from TB! list ?
--
I don't think you have a very strong argument here.
You're obviously not too lazy annoying everybody with your test
messages.
SH Really ?
The argument that wasn't strong was that you said I am too lazy. I
certainly didn't question the work you're doing (and, just to get the
record straight,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi ETM,
@29 July 2002, 10:33 -0400 (15:33 UK time) ETM [E] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Syafril Hermansyah:
Sorry, I am too lazy to create new $listname which have actually same
setting as TBUDL has, no time for it... at
On Mon, 29 Jul 2002 16:19:11 +0100 Marck D Pearlstone
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ ...]
I suggest you change your trash filter to filter test subjects but
*not* Syafril. You may miss important service announcements.
Not so important for anyone who not using upper 127 character set.
For now, I
I had to go to my archived OE mail to find the welcome letter (never
been successful in importing 3 gig of OE6 into TB) and did find
this at the very end of the Welcome Letter sent to me in December
of last year. I indeed apologize for suggesting he has been
delegated to the trash folder.
Hi Daniel,
On Monday, July 29, 2002, 4:19:44 PM, you [DJ] wrote:
DJ Hi Ben,
I think it would be really cool if you could set the transparency of
the mail ticker.
DJ hey that's a cool idea! And in Windows2000 or XP it's really easy to
DJ implement. You only have to use 4 WinAPI Functions.
Hi Marck,
On Monday, July 29, 2002, 3:42:54 PM, you [MDP] wrote:
BK Also, I would like it to appear as an option when you right click
BK an email.
MDP It does, if you Right Click on the message body not the message list.
BK Doh! Doh! Why have it only on the message body though?
MDP Because
Hello Eddy,
Was there ever a solution to this? I am a VAR and have about 100
customers using TB!. I have one customer that has this problem daily.
He receives large attachments from a variety of people, and most of
them are being corrupted when they are transferred out of the bat,
either to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Ben,
@29 July 2002, 17:02 +0100 Ben Kennish [BK] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck D
Pearlstone:
MDP Because it's a function of a message and not a folder / message
MDP list.
BK Hmmm. But I would say that if I right
Hello Bernd!
On Monday, July 29, 2002 at 5:01:44 PM you wrote:
Common sense, courtesy and good manners dictate, at least, to phrase
such message differently, including a brief (!) statement as to why such
test message is unavoidable.
First of all the subject tells it ALL - like you want.
Hello St!
On Monday, July 29, 2002 at 5:09:25 PM you wrote:
...St would like to disappear somewhere under the North Pole...
Because you got it wrong completely or just because Syafril is the
last person to not send test messages?
Is it only the quite nice weather now - or the really bad
Marck D Pearlstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 07/22/2002 at 06:04 PM wrote:
Kerio Personal Firewall works quite well for me. There are others too. In fact,
ZA is the only one I have ever heard of that disrupted TB.
Allie C Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 07/22/2002 at 07:46 PM wrote:
OTOH, Kerio
Monday, July 29, 2002, 12:01:25 PM, you wrote:
On the subject of firewalls, I'm using the Wingate (v4.x)
firewall (which doesn't interfere with TB), but I have no
clue how reliable it is.
Anybody know? I don't know any way to test it, other than
Steve Gibsons port prober, which says it's cool
Hello Lynn,
Monday, July 29, 2002, 9:01:43 PM, you wrote:
LT Monday, July 29, 2002, 12:01:25 PM, you wrote:
LT On the subject of firewalls, I'm using the Wingate (v4.x)
LT firewall (which doesn't interfere with TB), but I have no
LT clue how reliable it is.
LT Anybody know? I don't know any
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Avram_Sacks [AS] wrote:
AS Zone Alarm and Black Ice are the only firewalls that have been
AS recommended on a law office technology list I participate in.
AS Assuming ZA is out and that Kerio,
On Monday, July 29, 2002, 3:08:07 PM, Allie C Martin wrote:
Kerio Personal Firewall is the most configurable, but the one with
the greatest demand on the user in terms of knowledge.
To me, this statement makes it sound like it requires a lot. It didn't
seem like much work to me. Just have to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Dwight A Corrin [DAC] wrote:
DAC To me, this statement makes it sound like it requires a lot. It
DAC didn't seem like much work to me. Just have to tick a box which
DAC says make a rule, then say
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 29 Jul 2002, at 17:02:26 [GMT +0100], Ben Kennish wrote:
MDP Because it's a function of a message and not a folder / message list.
BK Hmmm. But I would say that if I right click an email in the folder
BK pane and get Reply and Forward
Hi Michael,
On Monday, July 29, 2002, 10:24:15 PM, you [MAY] wrote:
MAY If you aren't reading the message, how would you accurately compose your reply?
MAY Michael A. Yetto
MAY - --
Well for a start because the bat includes the original message quoted
in the reply anyway.
But also my
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Michael A. Yetto
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmmm. But I would say that if I right click an email in the
folder pane and get Reply and Forward options, a Reply to
All would be appropriate?
If you aren't reading the message, how would you accurately
On Mon, 2002-07-29 at 20:00, Arjan de Groot wrote:
Here's another strange right-click menu-item:
http://www.linu.demon.nl/tb.png (37 KB)
I really wouldn't know how to Reply Quoting selected text when
TB! is focused on the Message List pane!
If you have the message preview pane open,
On Mon, 29 Jul 2002 18:29:11 +0200 Dierk Haasis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
[ ...]
Is it only the quite nice weather now - or the really bad one last
week - that seems to deteriorate our manners lately (mine included)?
Maybe it is.
Last week Philip Hazel from Cambridge Univ. UK (author of Exim
Replying to your message of Monday, July 29, 2002, 2:08:07 PM:
On another, another note...I use BBIagent's (www.bbiagent.net) firewall
which runs off of a floppy on a gateway machine. It uses iptables and is
quite configurable provided you know a little bit about firewalls.
--
Pete
On Mon, 2002-07-29 at 21:45, Pete Milne wrote:
On another, another note...I use BBIagent's (www.bbiagent.net) firewall
which runs off of a floppy on a gateway machine. It uses iptables and is
quite configurable provided you know a little bit about firewalls.
And a general understanding of
On Monday, July 29, 2002, 8:35:43 PM, Jonathan Angliss wrote:
Here's another strange right-click menu-item:
http://www.linu.demon.nl/tb.png (37 KB)
I really wouldn't know how to Reply Quoting selected text when
TB! is focused on the Message List pane!
If you have the message preview
Hello Jason,
On Mon, 29 Jul 2002 12:16:18 -0400 GMT (29/07/02, 23:16 +0700 GMT),
Jason Gottschalk wrote:
JG He receives large attachments from a variety of people, and most of
JG them are being corrupted when they are transferred out of the bat,
JG either to the hard drive or to a viewer.
So
Hello Avram,
On Mon, 29 Jul 2002 14:01:25 -0500 GMT (30/07/02, 02:01 +0700 GMT),
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Acc Zone Alarm and Black Ice are the only firewalls that have been recommended on a
Acc law office technology list I participate in.
Why are the lawyers not recommending the otehrs? Were
29 July 2002, 21:01, you wrote:
LT Anybody know? I don't know any way to test it, other than
LT Steve Gibsons port prober, which says it's cool ...
PCflank has a range of tests at http://www.pcflank.com
--
Clive Taylor
Current Ver:
Hello Clive,
On Tue, 30 Jul 2002 06:25:06 +0100 GMT (30/07/02, 12:25 +0700 GMT),
Clive Taylor wrote:
LT Anybody know? I don't know any way to test it, other than
LT Steve Gibsons port prober, which says it's cool ...
Tested my firewall on Norton, which says I am fine. (GRC keeps saying
the
Dear all List Member,
[ this is cross post to all TB! list under domain thebat.dutaint.com ]
We have change the bounce watcher on this list, to be more accurate.
As reflect of this changes, Ecartis (aka Listar) will seen all bounce
messages as Fatal Bounce (in the past we have 2 category : Fatal
54 matches
Mail list logo
