Re: Changing format of Message-ID

2006-04-01 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Thomas, On Sat, 1 Apr 2006 14:54:08 +0700GMT (1-4-2006, 9:54 +0100, where I live), you wrote: TF Testing. I've set a Reply-To address in the reply template for TB TF lists, so it won't affect PMs. TF This didn't work. Now I have set the Reply-To address in the Account TF Properties, as

Re: Changing format of Message-ID

2006-04-01 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Roelof, On Sat, 1 Apr 2006 10:08:09 +0200 GMT (01/04/2006, 15:08 +0700 GMT), Roelof Otten wrote: RO In order to keep that setting from messing with your PMs, you can set RO the reply-to in your account template with a macro to the correct RO value. Yes, but the account template will be

Re: Changing format of Message-ID

2006-04-01 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Thomas, On Sat, 1 Apr 2006 15:18:21 +0700GMT (1-4-2006, 10:18 +0100, where I live), you wrote: TF Yes, but the account template will be overwritten by my many AB TF templates. So I will have to add this to every AB template! TF Annoying... Yep, it would be really nice to be able to

Re: Incorrect displayed time after DST change

2006-04-01 Thread Chris
Hi 'Batters! My colleague today noticed that the Created and Received times are incorrectly displayed after the DST change of March 26. Our time zone is UTC+1, but messages created before the DST change are now displayed with UTC+2; for example 24-03-2006 14:55:00, while the message

Re: Incorrect displayed time after DST change

2006-04-01 Thread Robin Anson
On Thu, 30 Mar 2006 at 13:38:24 +0200, Cory wrote: My colleague today noticed that the Created and Received times are incorrectly displayed after the DST change of March 26. Our time zone is UTC+1, but messages created before the DST change are now displayed with UTC+2; for example 24-03-2006

Re[2]: Changing format of Message-ID

2006-04-01 Thread Stuart Cuddy
Hello Thomas, Saturday, April 1, 2006, 1:54:08 AM, you wrote: This didn't work. Now I have set the Reply-To address in the Account Properties, as you suggested. Could someone please explain where this header info gets used, other than for setting the message id. I'm assuming here that the

Re: Changing format of Message-ID

2006-04-01 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Stuart, On Sat, 1 Apr 2006 09:32:53 -0600 GMT (01/04/2006, 22:32 +0700 GMT), Stuart Cuddy wrote: SC Could someone please explain where this header info gets used, other SC than for setting the message id. I'm assuming here that the info in SC this header need not be a real

Re[2]: Changing format of Message-ID

2006-04-01 Thread Stuart Cuddy
Hello Thomas, Saturday, April 1, 2006, 9:48:03 AM, you wrote: TF This header info is used for threading. My messages still thread when TF I just use my normal settings, so why do I want to use a different TF domain in the mid, you may ask. TF The practical reason is that it allows me to create a

Re: Changing format of Message-ID

2006-04-01 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Stuart, On Sat, 1 Apr 2006 10:13:54 -0600 GMT (01/04/2006, 23:13 +0700 GMT), Stuart Cuddy wrote: TF The practical reason is that it allows me to create a Virtual Folder TF in TB that shows the threads I am involved in (as long as everybody TF uses an email client that threads properly, for

Wish: Implementation of scoring system

2006-04-01 Thread George M. Menegakis
Hello ppl! Anyone is interested in implementation of scoring system can add his/hers comments at https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5792 What is the scoring system? The scoring system was born at the news readers. It is not widely known, as for example the filters or the kill files, but it

Re: Wish: Implementation of scoring system

2006-04-01 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello George, On Sun, 2 Apr 2006 03:36:14 +0300 GMT (02/04/2006, 07:36 +0700 GMT), George M. Menegakis wrote: GMM Examples GMM Subject match (beta) is available score +10 You can use a colour group for that, or a virtual folder, or both. GMM From match aol.com score -10 If this is a friend,