I have accidently deleted a number of messages. I don't seem to be
able to move them back from my trash folder. Feeling stupid, I need
advice.
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.207.6581
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
Using IMAP with The Bat! Version 8.8.9 (64-bit) on Windows version 10,0 ()
___
Hello to my many old friends here. Yes I am still alive and batting, but I
don't know the last time I posted.
I just installed on a new computer, and I cannot for the life me remember how
to sort the account tree.
Thanks in advance. I imagine I owe MAU another beer.
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.2
On Wednesday, September 1, 2021, 4:41:27 PM, MAU wrote:
> Right click on any folder and from context menu select Move Up, Down,
> In or Out.
>> Thanks in advance. I imagine I owe MAU another beer.
When I added the account, it filled the account randomly from top to bottom. I
seem to remember t
On Wednesday, September 1, 2021, 4:44:36 PM, MAU wrote:
>> I just installed on a new computer, and I cannot for the life me
>> remember how to sort the account tree.
> Or you can click on the Name column and you will will get a dialog
> that allows you to select different sortings.
ok. shoul
On Monday, February 11, 2008, 11:02:57 AM, Alto Speckhardt wrote:
> It forces a restart of TheBat.
Usually of you focus on another folder, then return it takes care of
itself.
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
photo galleries at http://dcorrin.smugmug.c
On Tuesday, February 19, 2008, 6:18:22 PM, Christopher W. wrote:
> Nope:
too bad. mine got quite a bit better when I did that
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
photo galleries at http://dcorrin.smugmug.com
Using IMAP with The Bat! 4.0.14.3 on Windows Vi
On Tuesday, February 19, 2008, 7:04:00 PM, Christopher W. wrote:
> What server? Mine is Cyrus.
same here. I'm at fastmail
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
photo galleries at http://dcorrin.smugmug.com
Using IMAP with The Bat! 4.0.14.3 on Windows Vista
On Wednesday, February 20, 2008, 9:13:27 AM, Tim Hamm wrote:
> I made my reply template empty as you suggested but the default
> template did not repopulate itself. So what do I do? Uninstall and
> reinstall the program with the fields empty to bring my default
> templates back?
you could make
On Wednesday, February 27, 2008, 5:28:52 PM, Roelof Otten wrote:
> And please don't top post, it's against the list rules and as
> moderator I've got to enforce those.
that is the baby guppy
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
photo galleries at http://dc
On Saturday, March 1, 2008, 5:14:56 AM, David Elliott wrote:
> I know that gMail will not show your email in the inbox if you sent
> it to a list.
if it doesn't get in your inbox, how could pop3 collect it from there?
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
p
On Sunday, March 2, 2008, 3:18:43 PM, Rick Grunwald wrote:
> The conversation was about mailing lists.
the conversation was about the fact that it was a known fact the
message would never hit the inbox, but whether a pop connection would
be able to collect it anyway.
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.30
On Sunday, March 2, 2008, 6:29:59 PM, Rick Grunwald wrote:
>>> The conversation was about mailing lists.
>> the conversation was about the fact that it was a known fact the
>> message would never hit the inbox, but whether a pop connection would
>> be able to collect it anyway.
> Excuse me sir
On Sunday, March 2, 2008, 8:41:29 PM, Rick Grunwald wrote:
> Was there something incorrect in what I told him?
I don't know. My response was to his question. I probably hadn't
even seen your response when I responded.
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
On Tuesday, March 18, 2008, 3:37:30 PM, Volker Ahrendt wrote:
> Why should I not move parked messages and keep the "Parked" flag?
You can't have a message be parked and moved at the same time. It
would be like having a door locked and open it the same time.
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385 pho
On Wednesday, March 19, 2008, 9:43:38 AM, Luc wrote:
> I see your point but since apparently it's possible when you copy
> the message,
so it does. Makes sense, since the message is parked when it's
copied, but not when it's moved. Solves the problem about not being
able to find it at its destina
On Wednesday, March 19, 2008, 8:26:52 AM, Maggie Meister wrote:
> Absolutely agree. In my Lists subfolders I have TBUDL, TBBETA, and
> TBParked. I park some messages in the first two, but don't get
> around to moving them for a while - when I do, they all unpark of
> course, into the Parked fold
On Monday, March 24, 2008, 10:58:12 AM, Roelof Otten wrote:
> IIRC some older v4 version had some problems registering properly
> with Vista and the proper way to get that right was to uninstall the
> older version and install the new version. So I'd advice you to
> uninstall TB (don't delete your
On Tuesday, March 25, 2008, 11:52:25 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Has SMTP with Gmail been resolved yet?
I have no trouble sending mail through gmail
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
photo galleries at http://dcorrin.smugmug.com
Using IMAP with The B
On Saturday, March 29, 2008, 3:30:22 PM, Alto Speckhardt wrote:
> It's rather absurd that it took three major versions to _not_ get it
> working, wouldn't you agree?
well, it could certainly have improved more. but I still prefer it to
any of the other IMAP clients I tried.
--
Dwight A. Corrin
On Saturday, March 29, 2008, 5:02:37 PM, Michael J. Sharp wrote:
> At present (some issues have to be solved) The Bat! does not
> work with Gmail via IMAP4-protocol, but successfully does with
> POP3.
that must have been some time ago, because it is very serviceable with
gmail now.
On Saturday, March 29, 2008, 5:07:32 PM, Michael J. Sharp wrote:
> So please tell us how you got it working.
It has been working so long I have no memory of any fine tuning. If
you look at the beta archives from back when it was first being worked
on there I'm sure you will find some discussions
On Saturday, March 29, 2008, 6:19:08 PM, Mark Partous wrote:
> Except of course when your provider has decided to stop offering
> IMAP :-)
I've been very satisfied with fastmail, and there are others out there
too, some even free.
your message caused me to look at my provider's email services. T
On Wednesday, April 9, 2008, 8:00:54 PM, Michael J. Sharp wrote:
> Can this knowledgeable group please suggest concrete steps to take
> to resolve this unholy mess?
use a manageable number of accounts
use common folders
add the folder column to the message finder
get an IMAP account, and set it u
On Thursday, April 10, 2008, 11:15:29 PM, Michael J. Sharp wrote:
DC>> use common folders
> I am not sure I understand the concept of common folders, could you expand a
> bit.
common folders are just what the name implies. They are a tree of
folders which are not related to any particular accoun
On Sunday, June 1, 2008, 3:46:35 PM, Jack S. LaRosa wrote:
> What won't work? Reading mail? Are you confirming the machine is
> essentially locked during the backup?
No. The machine isn't tied up at all. You just can't get the bat do do
a backup and do other things at the same time. Makes sense t
On Thursday, June 12, 2008, 6:30:08 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Is there an email client anyone can recommend that plays nice with
> IMAP?
I have no problems with TB.
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
photo galleries at http://dcorrin.smugmug.com
Us
On Thursday, July 17, 2008, 12:09:58 PM, Bob Riley wrote:
> They do say, unlike what I hear in our TB newsgroups, that TB has no
> reported issues with their IMAP.
I am very happy with the combination of fastmail and thebat, although
I will be even happier when a few niggling issues are addressed
On Thursday, July 17, 2008, 9:46:43 PM, Günter Minnerup wrote:
> I have such an archive account already, to keep my POP3 message base
> manageable. So what you're saying is simply "move everything beyond
> the server quota into the archive account"?
exactly
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385 pho
On Thursday, July 17, 2008, 9:39:12 PM, Günter Minnerup wrote:
> and all
> of TB's filtering of the inbox to the folders therefore takes place at
> server level?
actually, you make use of the IMAP filters. This works better than
filtering locally, because otherwise, sometimes you are filtering wi
On Tuesday, August 26, 2008, 12:58:46 PM, Gary Lucas wrote:
> Yes, but Kookiejar manages the cookies and selects them randomly. I have
> Kookiejar put a random cookie in cookie.txt every 5 min.
and you are stuck with their cookies. With TB! you can have cookies
which are not just bland cookies,
On Sunday, September 7, 2008, 10:30:34 AM, Rick wrote:
> No picture was attached
> -
not allowed on this list
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
photo galleries at http://dcorrin.smugmug.com
Using IMAP with The Bat! 4.0.34 on Windows Vista version 6,0 (S
On Sunday, September 7, 2008, 10:43:39 AM, Leonard Berkowitz wrote:
> And I hope that the moderators will block statements that contain
> comments or opinions, of whatever stripe, about the forthcoming U.S.
> election.
where did that come from? and are they supposed to monitor people's
cookies? )
On Saturday, September 27, 2008, 7:03:21 PM, Jens Franik wrote:
> Would you mind, giving us more Details like OS, Version and what exactly
> does not work.
is it not working because people don't send confirmation, or because
you don't?
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax
dcorr
On Sunday, September 28, 2008, 5:49:01 AM, Privateofcourse wrote:
> It is not working!
it is working perfectly here. just the same as it alway does.
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
photo galleries at http://dcorrin.smugmug.com
Using IMAP with The Bat!
On Wednesday, October 1, 2008, 12:33:24 AM, Ian A. White wrote:
> So maybe this needs to be clarified.
> What is the situation that prompted this thread?
I think noone with complaints wants us to know. I asked several times,
and still am in the dark.
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385 phone ah
On Thursday, October 2, 2008, 3:30:13 PM, Jens Franik wrote:
> Read my Mail(s) i did explain it once, which is enough as i think.
I must have missed that one. I shouldn't have to read them all to find
it, you could have supplied the mid.
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax
dco
On Tuesday, January 27, 2009, 3:56:27 PM, Lynn wrote:
> Many have several roots, as many as 5 on the worst. And it is evident
> that they change the content from mailing to mailing, so that one
> determination is not enough. EBay notices frequently have several; since
> various items/vendors are i
On Wednesday, February 25, 2009, 10:42:06 AM, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
>>>شوكرﴼ
TF>> I think I got the correct word isolated above. The cursor goes
TF>> left-to-write but internally deletes right-to-left.
TF>> Hey everybody, do you see Arabic writing? Can somebody give me
TF>> Ste
On Sunday, March 8, 2009, 6:54:58 AM, Jens Franik wrote:
> I would not want to use the IMAP right now and i would not recommend
> you either...
IMAP in general works reasonably well in TB! I've been using it for
years now. I don't, however, copy big blocks of messages TO an IMAP
server so
On Thursday, March 19, 2009, 9:01:46 AM, Jack S. LaRosa wrote:
> Does
> TB have any method (setting) which would warn the sender that he/she
> is about to send a message where all recipients would be able to see
> all addresses to whom the message was sent?
that would certainly be a nuisanc
On Thursday, March 19, 2009, 3:20:56 PM, MFPA wrote:
> Not just prudent - under certain circumstances, sharing personal data
> in this way without the permission of the data subject would be
> unlawful, as well as bad manners.
Unlawful??
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax
dcor
On Tuesday, March 17, 2009, 1:15:06 PM, Peter Fjelsten wrote:
>> Has anyone encountered a similar problem or any idea why this happens?
I don't understand why you don't sort the mail in your IMAP account
as it arrives there. I do virtually no filtering with TB! anymore.
--
Dwight A. Corrin
On Thursday, March 19, 2009, 9:01:46 AM, Jack S. LaRosa wrote:
> Does
> TB have any method (setting) which would warn the sender that he/she
> is about to send a message where all recipients would be able to see
> all addresses to whom the message was sent?
that would certainly be a nuisanc
On Friday, May 22, 2009, 10:24:21 AM, Stuart Cuddy wrote:
> Always glad to help out a fellow IMAP fan. Just hoping that we will
> see something soon regarding improvements. HINT, HINT, HINT
Am hoping that soon to follow release of 4.1.14.xx will be the IMAP
beta series.
--
Dwight A. Cor
On Saturday, June 13, 2009, 2:54:10 PM, Marek Mikus wrote:
> no, ADDHEADER adds value to header, while SETHEADER changes header, there
> is no bug here.
SETHEADER works here on XP, but not on Vista. and yes, the syntax is
the same on both machines.
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385 phone ahea
On Tuesday, June 16, 2009, 6:06:43 AM, Roelof Otten wrote:
DAC>> SETHEADER works here on XP, but not on Vista. and yes, the syntax is
DAC>> the same on both machines.
> Did you define the header you wanted to set in the account on the
> Vista PC?
to me, it looks the same as on my xp ma
On Tuesday, June 16, 2009, 1:24:55 AM, Robin Anson wrote:
> Works on Vista for me - exactly the same syntax as I had running until
> recently on XP.
following is my reply template
> On %ODateEn, %OTimeLongEn, %OFROMNAME wrote:
> %SINGLERE
> %QUOTES
> %SETHEADER("X-Rogue",":dcorrin:")%-
On Tuesday, June 16, 2009, 7:38:36 AM, Roelof Otten wrote:
> That's not what I meant.
> Did you define the X-Rogue header at
> Options -> Preferences -> Viewer/Editor -> Message Headers?
who remembers all of what they did to make things on a computer 4 or 5
years ago, to switch? :blush:
--
D
On Tuesday, June 23, 2009, 8:23:01 PM, Lynn wrote:
> I've discovered another problem here, which is that none of the changes
> made to the folders on the server seem to be updating in TB! - which
> means I will likely have to delete the accounts and start again :-/
manage imap folders, reset lis
On Tuesday, July 7, 2009, 9:28:13 PM, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
> Running two seperate versions of the TheBat! on the same machine which
> will require some registry fiddling.
workarounds seem always to be a dime a dozen (and often not worth that
much), but a fix is more like a hen's tooth.
On Wednesday, July 8, 2009, 12:36:04 PM, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
> A very colourful remark while still right on the dot. I hope you mean
> that a fix is what we need.
> I know the "hen's tooth" in the context of something being very rare.
> I hope you don't mean that any hope for a (timely) fix
On Friday, August 14, 2009, 1:07:38 PM, Geoff Lane wrote:
> Also, AIUI, later versions of TB aren't as strict as v1 about not
> retrieving external images etc.
that isn't so.
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
photo galleries at http://dcorri
On Saturday, August 22, 2009, 12:32:20 PM, Bill McQuillan wrote:
> Now I have figured the reason is that RitLabs considers that the Windows
> Editor is to be normally used with proportional fonts and that the number
> of characters is not an appropriate measurement (although they seem to
> handle
On Saturday, August 29, 2009, 11:52:44 AM, MFPA wrote:
> I would suggest instead to archive them within TB! in a
> password-protected "archive" account(s). That way, they are always
> easily to hand when you are using TB! but never actually get loaded
> unless you enter the password to go into th
On Saturday, August 29, 2009, 12:54:21 PM, Susanne wrote:
> Do you just use the same data you use for setting
> up the main account when going through the set-up
> process?
> Or some random information?
just random info. my servers are set as notone.com, might make sure
check mail on start up
On Thursday, September 3, 2009, 5:18:11 AM, Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
> Long lines are wrapped to the width of that window and it is just
> plain wrong that they were sent to me that way IMNSHO.
even worse is when they don't even wrap, but there is good reason for
lines to be shorter. They are
On Wednesday, December 9, 2009, 10:45:57 PM, Tim Hamm wrote:
>> Strange. Try typing "set" (without quotes) in a command window and
>> seeing what path is reported for TEMP.
> C:\WINDOWS\TEMP
That was where I started, but I found almost a thousand files which
were in [my user name]/appdata/
On Thursday, December 17, 2009, 9:23:29 AM, Richard Newman wrote:
> Since updating to Windows 7, underlines for misspelled words have
> disappeared.
not having a problem here
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
photo galleries at http://dc
On Friday, December 18, 2009, 10:44:48 AM, Roelof Otten wrote:
> Yes. Bug fixes are never implemented in abandoned versions.
installing a bug fix would be an upgrade.
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
photo galleries at http://dcorrin.smugmu
On Sunday, January 17, 2010, 2:21:38 PM, Rick wrote:
> Is there any good reason for doing so?
I'd think for some users there would be good reasons. For others,
maybe not.
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
photo galleries at http://dcorri
On Monday, January 18, 2010, 10:25:38 AM, Martin Schneider wrote:
>> can anybody tell me where The Bat! stores the splash screen that shows
>> on startup?
> It is stored within the EXE. If you use a tool like MultiExtractor you
> can see all the files within an EXE-file.
that should mean you
On Monday, January 18, 2010, 8:34:17 AM, Cesar Santos wrote:
> If I don't let those items checked how the effective protection will
> be performed using Kaspersky along TheBat! ?
but you've gotten rid of the objectionable popup?
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax
d
On Wednesday, March 10, 2010, 7:33:48 PM, Sam Brown wrote:
> In the sense that there's a button right there on the email to
> display the URL Manager... Look for the button that shows a globe
> with a question mark in the lower right corner.
right. there is no bug here
--
Dwight A. Corrin
On Wednesday, March 10, 2010, 8:30:53 PM, Rick wrote:
> No bug here?
wad
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
photo galleries at http://dcorrin.smugmug.com
photo blog at http://dcorrin.aminus3.com
http://photos.vfxy
On Wednesday, March 10, 2010, 8:46:54 PM, Rick wrote:
> We're talking about 2 different things. I am talking about images
> included with the email that show in the email in the bat, but not
> when the same email is loaded in a browser.
that is what he is talking about also. If it's already in
On Monday, April 5, 2010, 4:05:42 PM, Ian A. White wrote:
> I am having endless trouble with one
> client who refuses to accept ANY e-mail that has an attachment.
I have to say that I find attachments for signature purposes to be
very annoying. Since I use IMAP it is not to simple to del
nager?
--
Dwight Corrin
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
http://dcorrin.smugmug.com
http://dcorrin.aminus3.com
Current version is 4.2.23 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
t. So I never move
folders, just contents.
--
Dwight Corrin
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
http://dcorrin.smugmug.com
http://dcorrin.aminus3.com
Current version is 4.2.23 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
On Tuesday, June 1, 2010, 3:59:35 PM, Tim Hamm wrote:
> TB is crashing on me whenever I try to launch a URL within my
> emails.
same url, or every url?
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
photo galleries at http://dcorrin.smugmug.com
ph
On Tuesday, June 1, 2010, 11:53:23 PM, Tim Hamm wrote:
> Every...
Is your browser already open when you try?
Have you tried changing default browsers?
Does some other email app successfully open the links?
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
p
On Sunday, August 22, 2010, 8:30:23 AM, MFPA wrote:
> For IMAP accounts behaving differently, dunno as I only use POP.
can't imagine how anything is different in IMAP as far as templates
go. Never noticed it here.
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax
dcorrin at fast
On Sunday, August 22, 2010, 7:37:26 PM, TheLimit wrote:
> And you use both?
actually no. I rarely use pop at all any more. Have my IMAP account
collect all my POP mail.
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
photo galleries at http://dcorrin.s
On Tuesday, October 26, 2010, 5:03:47 AM, jb_lists...@trink.co.uk wrote:
>> I'm beginning to think that not many Batters are using
>> IMAP, and maybe more to the point, the reason for it :-/
> I have Thunderbird installed for just such occasions. My preferred
> client is The Bat, but since it is
On Thursday, November 25, 2010, 5:48:10 PM, Tim Hamm wrote:
> This is extremely frustrating to say the least. Can someone please
> from TB chime in on this? TB technical support has been unable or even
> uninterested it seems to offer and kind of technical assistance in
> resolving this i
On Friday, December 3, 2010, 10:41:49 AM, Tim Hamm wrote:
> I just recently reinstalled TB only a few days ago and now
> this. I don't know what to make of it only that it has to do with
> TB.
there are still two questions you were asked, but never addressed in
the last thread you s
On Saturday, January 15, 2011, 10:49:50 PM, Sacks, Avram wrote:
> If you have set up a whole bunch of folders for your mail, do you have
> to do the same for your phone? Aren't the folders located on the
> computer?
best to create the folders and do the sorting on the server. then they
are
On Saturday, January 15, 2011, 11:21:20 PM, Sacks, Avram wrote:
> Is your positive experience with IMAP a function of using ver. 5.0.0, or
> were you able to get it to work with version 4.0.18. or earlier?
version 4.x worked better with IMAP than any other client I tried.
4.0.18 is a pretty
On Tuesday, February 1, 2011, 7:51:06 PM, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
> In fact, no we are talking about different things. You have just
> described "search string".
> I have four "search conditions". These are:
> Header contains
> Sender contains
> Subject contains
> Text contains
> I can add more
On Thursday, February 3, 2011, 3:10:05 PM, Jeff Gaines wrote:
> You can't fatten a tiger for Easter :-)
why not? my house cats always get fat
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
photo galleries at http://dcorrin.smugmug.com
photo blog at htt
On Tuesday, March 8, 2011, 9:04:42 PM, Munango-Keewati wrote:
> Has anyone else noticed this behavior? Anyone have any suggestions
> for a way to fix it?
I have always had gmail automatically forward my incoming mail to my
IMAP account, so I can deal with it there with all my other email (my
On Wednesday, March 9, 2011, 1:44:51 AM, howard b. schwartz wrote:
> remove my name and email address.
there are instructions on the bottom of your message (and of this one)
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
photo galleries at http://dcorri
On Friday, May 6, 2011, 3:04:23 PM, Gary Odom wrote:
> Create an HTML email.
easily done. did you have any particular type of content in mind?
> Save it.
done
> Close it.
It's already closed, by the way I saved it.
> Open it. What you see is garbage,
Mine looks fine. What do you
On Friday, May 6, 2011, 9:06:12 PM, Gary Odom wrote:
> Software testing requires testing various scenarios Dwight. If you have no
> idea
> of what I did, then your literacy skills are in question.
No. I think it may be your literary skills. When I created an html
mail it looked fine.
On Wednesday, May 25, 2011, 9:13:57 AM, Roelof Otten wrote:
IAW>> I put the first few ones in my Outbox using the "Put message in
IAW>> Outbox" button.
> You should have used 'save as draft'
once again lack of a draft folder causes confusion
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385 phone ahe
On Thursday, May 26, 2011, 8:15:11 AM, Ian A. White wrote:
> Even so, the mere fact that a message is in an Outbox should not mean
> that it is automatically sent unless it has been scheduled to be sent,
> or because the user has done a send queued mail in that account.
'Put message in outbox'
On Thursday, May 26, 2011, 11:20:43 AM, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
> True. In fact, this is how I have been using TB! suceessfully since
> v1.x.
yes. 1.60 for me it looks like.
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
photo galleries at http://dcorrin
On Thursday, May 26, 2011, 4:30:36 PM, Ian A. White wrote:
DC>> 'Put message in outbox' has always resulted in the message being sent as
DC>> far back as I remember.
> Yes, but only if you had automatic timed sending of queued mail. I
> have never had The Bat! set to automatically send queued m
On Monday, June 6, 2011, 8:42:16 AM, Si wrote:
> If you have more than one signature delimiter - or cut-line if you like - in
> a message, TB! currently treats the last occurrence as the delimiter, and
> ignores any cut-lines before it, so unwanted signatures can still appear in
> the message bod
On Tuesday, June 7, 2011, 6:03:33 AM, Si wrote:
> but then it is clearly preferred by some, and not
> all. Anyhow, I was just after a solution to a problem that I face replying
> on other message lists where the flamin' list software appends list
> information to the end of the message but preced
On Tuesday, July 26, 2011, 7:51:30 AM, Jack S. LaRosa wrote:
> Kim Komando
real name is?
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
photo galleries at http://dcorrin.smugmug.com
photo blog at http://dcorrin.aminus3.com
h
On Tuesday, July 26, 2011, 9:16:20 AM, Mark Partous wrote:
> Hello Dwight,
> Tuesday, July 26, 2011, 3:36:01 PM, you wrote:
DC>> real name is?
> ,--/ From Wikipedia \
> | Komando was born and raised in New Jersey. According to her
> show's website, "Komando" is her actual last name,
On Tuesday, January 3, 2012, 11:44:45 AM, Julian Beach (Lists) wrote:
> So, if you are holding off on an upgrade because you are afraid that
> TB! v5 will not be as good as your current version, my experience is
> that the upgrade is painless. If you are expecting a new look and feel to
> the sof
On Friday, October 5, 2012, 11:32:37 AM, Susanne wrote:
> is there a way to highlight part of an email and then reply to all?
hold the shift key and click on the reply to all icon
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
photo galleries at http://d
On Friday, February 8, 2013, 8:44:58 PM, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
> We are (probably) venturing off-topic but I dare to reply: I never
> heard of this comic before, quote interesting! I was at comic-reading
> age when they stopped it, so my excuse is that it was probably never
> translated into Ge
On Sunday, March 17, 2013, 12:02:35 PM, MAU wrote:
> One of the reasons being that it
> would not be the first time that using autocomplete the message was sent
> to the wrong person.
this can particularly be a problem because of how reply addresses to
lists are constructed. This message is
On Thursday, May 2, 2013, 11:18:05 AM, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
> Aha. And which one would that be?
whatever you choose.
--
Dwight A. Corrin
h: 316.303.9385
c: 316.207.6581
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
photo galleries at http://dcorrin.smugmug.com
Using IMAP with The Bat! 5.3.8.8 (BETA) on Windows
On Thursday, May 2, 2013, 5:11:59 PM, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
> Where do I choose the default font?
I have no idea. The default default has been fine for me. The only
defaults I change are for the plain text viewer.
--
Dwight A. Corrin
h: 316.303.9385
c: 316.207.6581
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
On Tuesday, May 7, 2013, 1:11:15 AM, Barry wrote:
> A attachments are received as 'part.att' which means I can't open them with
> their default programs. I can, however, save the attached file and rename
> it with the correct file extension which seems to work.
I've never encountered this probl
On Friday, August 30, 2013, 6:02:33 PM, Jack S. LaRosa wrote:
> SMTP Server is smtp.gmail.com
> Secure to regular port (STARTTLS) Port 587
> Use SMTP Servers On-The-Go is un-ticked
> Nothing is ticked in Authentication
these settings are working fine for me, on two accounts.
--
Dwight A. Corri
On Friday, August 30, 2013, 6:02:33 PM, Jack S. LaRosa wrote:
> SMTP Server is smtp.gmail.com
> Secure to regular port (STARTTLS) Port 587
> Use SMTP Servers On-The-Go is un-ticked
> Nothing is ticked in Authentication
I take back my previous statement.
I have pefrform smtp authentication
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
