Re: Attachment Name Problems

2003-11-20 Thread Mark Wieder
-Encoding: base64 Content-Description: Unknown Document Content-Disposition: inline; filename=YOU ARE INVITED!.pdf -- -Mark Wieder Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4 Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL

Re: Security concerns

2003-11-15 Thread Mark Wieder
? The Account | Properties | Files Directories | Directory setting should get you what you want. Point it to where you moved the directory and that oughta do it. -- -Mark Wieder Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4

Several Spams that will not filter.

2003-11-13 Thread Mark Thomas
did not know if it would mess up the email, but it was a message.html. Thanks, Mark Thomas mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Quote of the Day: My Reality Check bounced. Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information: http

Re[2]: Several Spams that will not filter.

2003-11-13 Thread Mark Thomas
tags. This spammer could be a real pain in the behind! Thanks for taking the time for me! -- Best regards, Markmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Thursday, November 13, 2003, 3:23:57 AM, you wrote: S -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- S Hash: SHA1 S Hello Mark, S On Thu

Re[2]: Several Spams that will not filter.

2003-11-13 Thread Mark Thomas
SaveTemplate: SndFile: SysSound: 0 SoundTime: 0:00-0:00 AllowTime: 0:00-0:00 EndFilter -- Best regards, Markmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Thursday, November 13, 2003, 3:37:47 AM, you wrote: T On Thursday, November 13, 2003 at 9:33 AM, Mark wrote: First post, so hello

Re[2]: Several Spams that will not filter.

2003-11-13 Thread Mark Thomas
Hello Simon, You should have it. I did not notice the list behind your name. I also posted the Ctrl-C of the filter I am using. You should see the same results. I think. -- Best regards, Markmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Thursday, November 13, 2003, 4:14:48 AM, you

Re: Mod: Top posting with cutmark (was: Several Spams that will not filter.)

2003-11-13 Thread Mark Thomas
Hello Marck, Thursday, November 13, 2003, 4:27:04 AM, you wrote: MDP Hi Mark, MDP @13-Nov-2003, 03:54 -0700 (13-Nov 10:54 UK time) Mark Thomas said to MDP Terry: I have the template installed in the new template section. Using The Bat! v2.01.3 on Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998 MDP moderator MDP

Re[2]: Several Spams that will not filter.

2003-11-13 Thread Mark Thomas
Hello Peter, Thursday, November 13, 2003, 4:32:20 AM, you wrote: PA Hello Mark, PA Thursday, November 13, 2003, 10:33:56 AM, you wrote: I get 5 or 6 Spams for digital cable filters daily, and for some really strange reason, I cannot get a filter to work on one of them. PA Have you tried

Several Spams that will not filter.

2003-11-13 Thread Mark Thomas
Hello tbudl, Thanks everyone. I appreciate your comments. I'll work on the plugins. -- Best regards, Mark mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v2.01.3 on Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998 Quote of the Day: Never underestimate the power of very stupid people

Re[2]: Why isn't the message being PGP-signed?

2003-11-13 Thread Mark Partous
=393 Thanks! - -- Best Wishes, Mark using The Bat! 2.01.26 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP SDK 3.0.2 iQA/AwUBP7N9EBCgaTAR5oA9EQJgfgCfZrQYLVSzyA+OpIGKiw9+qA8KnU0AoNBA q7sNkpt1lB3KwPKZw0mqInd+ =X1bi -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current

Re[2]: Several Spams that will not filter.

2003-11-13 Thread Mark Thomas
Hello Simon, Thursday, November 13, 2003, 5:54:48 AM, you wrote: S -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- S Hash: SHA1 S Hello Mark, S On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 04:49:36 -0700 your time, you said: PA Have you tried placing the filter topmost, so that it is executed PA prior to all other (inbox

Re[2]: Mod: Top posting with cutmark

2003-11-13 Thread Mark Thomas
Hello Marck, Thursday, November 13, 2003, 5:20:59 AM, you wrote: MDP Hi Mark, MDP @13-Nov-2003, 04:37 -0700 (13-Nov 11:37 UK time) Mark Thomas said to MDP Marck: MDP .. Please don't feel singled out Mark. No problem. I take it constructively. It's been a long day! MDP Thanks

HTML errors in inbound emails

2003-11-13 Thread Mark Thomas
better errors in for this, but is this just me, or is there many other people experiencing the same problem? -- Best regards, Mark mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v2.01.3 on Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998 Quote of the Day: Humankind has not woven the web

alt-click!

2003-11-13 Thread Mark Wieder
something new. Thanks. -- -Mark Wieder Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4 Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: alt-click!

2003-11-13 Thread Mark Wieder
Allie- Thursday, November 13, 2003, 7:37:05 PM, you wrote: Hmmmpph! Well, I don't know about any of those, but *I* went to View | Display | Advanced Filtering | Header | uncheck the filter ...PITA if you ask me... I was hoping that shift-alt-click would do it, but no... -- -Mark Wieder

Why isn't the message being PGP-signed?

2003-11-12 Thread Mark Partous
get Mark Partous/380.50.30 instead of the expected: Mark Partous 02/380.50.30 I hope this shouldn't have been in TBBETA... -- Best Wishes, Mark using The Bat! 2.01.26 Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL

Re[2]: Why isn't the message being PGP-signed?

2003-11-12 Thread Mark Partous
that myself, but perhaps I was too preoccupied with the fact that the leading 02 also dissapeares. -- Best Wishes, Mark using The Bat! 2.01.26 Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information: http

Re[2]: Why isn't the message being PGP-signed?

2003-11-12 Thread Mark Partous
just doesn't work with mass-mailing QT's, perhaps even with all QT's wether they are being used for Mass-mailing. BTW the mass, in this case is as big as 19 addressees :-) Also, I meanwhile changed the %FROMADDR%- to %FROMADDR -- Best Wishes, Mark using The Bat

Re: replies and cutlines

2003-11-12 Thread Mark Wieder
laid out the sequence of events that will do what you want. However, expecting TB to ignore cut marks would be asking the developers to violate RFC-2646 in much the same way that Microsoft's developers did with OE. -- -Mark Wieder Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service

Re: Bat Alternatives

2003-11-10 Thread Mark Wieder
of the hedaer fields when creating a rg message (to, say delete one or 2 names from a list of addressees rg or to shorten the subject line)! Hmmm... all these work fine for me. Always have. Have you remapped your keyboard shortcuts? -- -Mark Wieder Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build

Re: What is unique about TB?

2003-11-07 Thread Mark Wieder
macs, but only because there's no TB client for OSX. Although, since OSX is built somewhat around FreeBSD, if the fabled TB linux client ever materializes I'll be switching over without thinking twice about it. Eudora's interface has always seemed too cartoony to me. -- -Mark Wieder Using The Bat

Going bananas?

2003-11-04 Thread Mark Partous
sets of strings, but that's neither the idea, nor very handy... Anyone there to wake me up??? -- Best Wishes, Mark using The Bat! 2.01.20 Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com

Re[2]: Going bananas?

2003-11-04 Thread Mark Partous
that)! Thanks. Must be that I still was too dizzy, weaning away from theatre :-) -- Best Wishes, Mark using The Bat! 2.01.20 Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat

Re: Error Could not export message

2003-11-04 Thread Mark Wieder
and attaching it? Do you have different user accounts on your computer? Are you logged in to windows as an administrator? -- -Mark Wieder Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4 Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL

Translations

2003-11-03 Thread Mark Wieder
Melissa- Sunday, November 2, 2003, 12:23:35 PM, you wrote: MR In any vulgar translation from one language to another, there can be MR interesting cultural connotations inferred. I guess that because in ...And don't miss http://www.tashian.com/multibabel/ -- -Mark Wieder Using The Bat! v1.63

Re: PGP info display

2003-11-02 Thread Mark Wieder
Roelof- Sunday, November 2, 2003, 12:34:03 AM, you wrote: RO MIME singing is merely a waste of time. ...unless it's accompaniment to air guitar... -- -Mark Wieder Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4

Re: TB! 2

2003-11-01 Thread Mark Wieder
SMTP authentication checked, but just because I do that on all my accounts. Probably isn't necessary. HTH. -- -Mark Wieder Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4 Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL

Re: bring mole recipe

2003-11-01 Thread Mark Wieder
DZ-Jay- Saturday, November 1, 2003, 4:29:02 AM, you wrote: ... and let me point out for us vegetarians that it's also excellent over lightly sauteed Portabella mushrooms. ... and trout ... -- -Mark Wieder Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4

Re: Too many 0 byte batXXX.tmp files under %temp% dir

2003-11-01 Thread Mark Wieder
*so* glad to have that in my past... I hate to say this about a Microsoft product, but win2k has been amazingly stable for me. -- -Mark Wieder Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4 Current version is 2.01.3

Re: bring mole recipe

2003-10-31 Thread Mark Wieder
Melissa- Friday, October 31, 2003, 1:05:38 AM, you wrote: MR We're still waiting for the mole recipe. :-) No moles around here. Would you settle for gopher? -- -Mark Wieder Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4

Re: bring mole recipe

2003-10-31 Thread Mark Wieder
DZ-Jay- Friday, October 31, 2003, 2:45:24 AM, you wrote: Powered by The Bat! v1.62r Hindered by MS Windows 2000 build 5.0.2195 Service Pack 3 ...and I love the tag line... -- -Mark Wieder Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4

Re: TB! 2

2003-10-31 Thread Mark Wieder
with TB all the time. No special configuration necessary - it worked from the first time I tried it. -- -Mark Wieder Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4 Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information: http

Re: Can I have both 1.62 and 2.0 on the same PC?

2003-10-30 Thread Mark Wieder
different experiences. -- -Mark Wieder Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4 Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Account General Settings

2003-10-30 Thread Mark Wieder
Rob- Thursday, October 30, 2003, 3:27:08 PM, you wrote: R the whole Help/F1 seems a bit 'incomplete' ... incomplete is probably the nicest thing I've heard anybody call TB's help system in a long time... -- -Mark Wieder Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack

Re: pgp xp freeware (upgrade PC) ?

2003-10-29 Thread Mark Partous
people are using that. I use the commercial version, but there should not be any difference as far as using it with The Bat! is concerned. - -- Best Wishes, Mark using The Bat! 2.01.15 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP SDK 3.0.2 iQA/AwUBP5

Re[2]: pgp xp freeware (upgrade PC) ?

2003-10-29 Thread Mark Partous
: Archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PGP-Basics/messages OT List: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PGP-Basics-OT OT Subscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Best Wishes, Mark using The Bat! 2.01.15

Re: TB! 2

2003-10-28 Thread Mark Wieder
of a day. -- -Mark Wieder Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4 Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: TB! 2

2003-10-28 Thread Mark Wieder
Douglas- Tuesday, October 28, 2003, 3:25:15 PM, you wrote: DH After Wed. Thurs. tomorrow and the day after) the cost doubles. Actually the cost goes to normal instead of being heavily discounted. -- -Mark Wieder Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4

Re: TB! 2

2003-10-27 Thread Mark Wieder
of the betas. The folder and file formats are the same and you shouldn't have any trouble switching back and forth. I was actually using beta 9 for a bit, but then I had to rebuild this computer a couple of days ago and lost the link. I'll have to put it back and get back to SP4 at the same time. -- -Mark

Re: TB! 2

2003-10-26 Thread Mark Wieder
), in which case I'm sticking with v1.63 for now. I keep both copies in TB's directory, named tb163.exe and tb200.exe. I just copy one or the other to the_bat.exe and restart TB. -- -Mark Wieder Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2

Re: the difference?

2003-10-26 Thread Mark Wieder
this is the one thing that prevents memos from being useful. -- -Mark Wieder Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: the difference?

2003-10-26 Thread Mark Wieder
a way to count the number of times a feature has been requested, but I'd add me to the list if there were. -- -Mark Wieder Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information

Re: Purchased the Bat!

2003-10-26 Thread Mark Wieder
Darrin- Sunday, October 26, 2003, 7:51:47 AM, you wrote: D lol! I think I say that about every day. I always find features that I D didnt know were there. Ditto here, although I usually find features because of discussion on this list. I'll take tbudl over documentation any day! -- -Mark

SMS messages and cell phones

2003-10-22 Thread Mark Wieder
woken up. :-( No more email to my cell phone! Am I the only one who thinks it's hilarious that when cell phones receive text messages they beep S-M-S in Morse code? Does anyone even know Morse code anymore? I was on a train the first time this happened and I couldn't stop laughing. -- -Mark

Re[2]: TheBat! on a blacklist?

2003-10-20 Thread Mark Partous
and write these ISP's? Why not warn them they risk being sued in the case of financial loss, due to blocking our legitimate mails? MDP Precisely!!! This practice should be campaigned against, not MDP encouraged by hiding from it and thus permitting it by default. Exactly! -- Best Wishes, Mark

Re: Glyphs won't change

2003-10-20 Thread Mark Partous
, you did not check High colour images on the Options/Preferences/General Tab? -- Best Wishes, Mark using The Bat! 2.01 Current version is 2.01 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: working on a pgp merit badge...

2003-10-19 Thread Mark Wieder
NA By the way Allie, your Key has expired. Are you simply going to change NA the expiry date... or generate an entirely new Key? ...and if you generate a new key, wouldn't that invalidate your whole argument for sending signed messages to the listserv? -- -Mark Wieder Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta

Re:

2003-10-19 Thread Mark Wieder
Vasiliy- This is very cool. I didn't realize I could display Cyrillic characters without changing the language set. -- -Mark Wieder Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4 Current version is 2.01 | Using TBUDL

Re: working on a pgp merit badge...

2003-10-19 Thread Mark Wieder
Peter- PM Not if this key was signed with the old (expired) one... :-) ...thanks, I think... -- -Mark Wieder Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4 Current version is 2.01 | Using TBUDL information: http

Re: Error message on TB Backup

2003-10-18 Thread Mark Wieder
to do a good job of fixing up the links most of the time. If you've got more serious damage than that, it may be time to bring up a hex file editor and patch the links yourself. -- -Mark Wieder Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4

Re: working on a pgp merit badge...

2003-10-17 Thread Mark Wieder
Allie- So... um... it's possible to fake a PGP-signing? If I can't trust an authorization after PGP has verified it, what good is it? -- -Mark Wieder Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4 Current version

working on a pgp merit badge...

2003-10-16 Thread Mark Wieder
isn't the proper place to be transmitting sensitive information, so what's the point? -- -Mark Wieder Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4 Current version is 2.01 | Using TBUDL information: http

Re: How to send mails un attended?

2003-10-06 Thread Mark Wieder
. -- -Mark Wieder Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4 Current version is 2.00.6 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Extracting email addresses

2003-10-04 Thread Mark Partous
in thsoe rpograms. http://go.to/eextractor -- Best Wishes, Mark using The Bat! 2.00.6 Current version is 2.00.6 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: Suggestion for better message list view reading

2003-10-04 Thread Mark Partous
Hello Allie, Saturday, October 4, 2003, 2:42:43 AM, you wrote: AM I'd add my 0.2c worth 0.2c? How does one pay that? :-) -- Best Wishes, Mark using The Bat! 2.00.6 Current version is 2.00.6 | Using TBUDL

Re: Suggestion for better message list view reading

2003-10-04 Thread Mark Wieder
Urban- !!! ROTFL -- -Mark Wieder Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 Current version is 2.00.6 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: What is the messy business

2003-10-04 Thread Mark Wieder
that both registration codes are kept in the registry, saved as SoftwareRegistrationId and SoftwareRegistrationId2. I can switch back and forth painlessly. Is this just me, or have other people been having problems with this? -- -Mark Wieder Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195

Re: RitLabs The Bat password

2003-10-04 Thread Mark Wieder
rich- You might want to check out PINs for keeping track of passwords and such. It's at http://www.mirekw.com/winfreeware/pins.html. -- -Mark Wieder Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4 Current version

Re: Suggestion for better message list view reading

2003-10-03 Thread Mark Wieder
posting will be trimmed properly. Simple, no? -- -Mark Wieder Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 Current version is 2.00.6 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: First impressions

2003-10-03 Thread Mark Wieder
up. -- -Mark Wieder Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 Current version is 2.00.6 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[3]: Suggestion for better message list view reading

2003-10-02 Thread Mark Partous
Hello Allen, Thursday, October 2, 2003, 4:50:03 PM, you wrote: LG Rather dash dash space A I think I deserve a fish. I think you should go to the nearest river, lake or sea and catch one for yourself! 't Would be too easy! :-) -- Best Wishes, Mark using

Re: First impressions

2003-10-02 Thread Mark Wieder
a pain. -- -Mark Wieder Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 Current version is 2.00.6 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: First impressions

2003-10-01 Thread Mark Wieder
of these would rule out TBv2 for me as an email client. I make a living as a QA engineer, and I'd be embarrassed to have this released on my watch. I'm going back to my favorite email client, even if I can't write macros to fiddle with the headers. -- -Mark Wieder Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7

Re: First impressions

2003-09-30 Thread Mark Wieder
mode off and then on again and I think everything's working fine now. There's a separate problem in that I've got v1.63 running on the server and 2.06 running on a client, so folder updates don't get propagated, but tomorrow I'll try running both in v2 mode and see what happens. -- -Mark Wieder

Re: Sophos AV plug-in

2003-09-30 Thread Mark Adams
the Quarantine MW folder no viruses are identified. It's working here, or rather it was at 1.15am this morning, haven't had a virus since. Thought - just sent myself a copy of the eicar test file and that was picked immediately. Suggest you check SAV itself. Mark -- Mark Adams

Re: First impressions

2003-09-30 Thread Mark Wieder
. AM Other than that, there are no 'secret' features. Darn g -- -Mark Wieder Using The Bat! v2.00.6 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 Current version is 2.00.6 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat

First impressions

2003-09-29 Thread Mark Wieder
that will show something more meaningful or is that Just The Way It Is? This is me moving back to v1.63b9. -- -Mark Wieder Using The Bat! v2.00.6 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 Current version is 2.00.6 | Using TBUDL information: http

The Bat! 2.00.6 issues?

2003-09-28 Thread Mark
I have just joined this list again to catch up on The Bat! v2 issues. Is there a list of current The Bat v2 issues? In the TBUDL and TBBETA archives, I read some e-mails where users lost all or some of their e-mails. I cannot afford such a loss and wonder if I should wait to upgrade to v2. --

FTP access to ftp.ritlabs.com - denied

2003-09-28 Thread Mark
In the past I always accessed RIT Labs FTP (ftp.ritlabs.com) through WS_FTP LE to download the latest releases and betas. You can no longer FTP to ftp.ritlabs.com as this is what WS_FTP LE reports: connecting to 198.63.208.135:21 Connected to 198.63.208.135 port 21 220 vserv3.cifnet.com FTP

Re: FTP access to ftp.ritlabs.com - denied

2003-09-28 Thread Mark
On Sunday, September 28, 2003, 2:36:08 PM, you wrote: In the past I always accessed RIT Labs FTP (ftp.ritlabs.com) through WS_FTP LE to download the latest releases and betas. You can no longer FTP to ftp.ritlabs.com as this is what WS_FTP LE reports: connecting to 198.63.208.135:21

Feedback on The Bat! v2.00.06/.018 from 1.62r

2003-09-28 Thread Mark
I decided to install The Bat! v2.00.06 (and updated to 2.00.018) over The Bat! v1.62r to decide if upgrading to The Bat! v2. I went through The Bat v2 not seeing many improvements or changes. I did notice the new look that seem a little odd to me probably because I am used to the old look. I

Re[2]: Fwd: Re: Spam

2003-09-27 Thread Mark Partous
%. Only to say it didn't take long... http://keir.net/k9.html -- Best Wishes, Mark using The Bat! 2.00.6 Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: Help with AddHeader, SetHeader ?

2003-09-26 Thread Mark L
and %ADDHEADER ??? X-My-Header=OValue then %SETHEADER(X-My-Header,BlaBla) X-My-Header=BlaBla but %ADDHEADER(X-My-Header,BlaBla) X-My-Header=OValueBlaBla -- Best regards, Mark mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TB! 2.00.6 on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 1 pgp0.pgp Description

Re: Where is TBUDL Archive nowadays?

2003-09-25 Thread Mark Wieder
Luc- Wednesday, September 24, 2003, 7:03:41 PM, you wrote: L Every message on this list get's this link: Unless you happen to receive digest mode, in which case it's nowhere in sight. -- -Mark Wieder Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2

Re: Where is TBUDL Archive nowadays?

2003-09-25 Thread Mark Wieder
Marck- Of course, in digest mode you'd have no idea that there were any archives... -- -Mark Wieder Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL information: http

Re: Where is TBUDL Archive nowadays?

2003-09-25 Thread Mark Wieder
for piecemeal. I'll get around to upgrading TB some day. I always say that procrastination is its own reward. -- -Mark Wieder Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL

Re: thebat.exe 100% CPU usage ... please help!

2003-09-24 Thread Mark Wieder
. Sometimes. I finally bit the bullet and reinstalled Win2k over the existing installation and everything's been fine since. It turns out that TB was exhibiting the most symptoms because it gets used the most, but the real problem was the OS. -- -Mark Wieder Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows

Re[2]: Getting rid of license type in X-mailer

2003-09-23 Thread Mark L
was using X-Ray but I've had trouble with signing messages with attachments. X-Ray seemed to manglethe message and I ended up with bad signatures. Anyone else noticed this or is it just me? -- Best regards, Mark mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TB! 2.00.6 on Windows XP 5.1

Re[2]: Getting rid of license type in X-mailer

2003-09-23 Thread Mark L
. -- Best regards, Markmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: account macro not working

2003-09-22 Thread Mark Wieder
MAU- Sunday, September 21, 2003, 1:10:08 PM, you wrote: All that's quite true, but it *is* a fact that the embedded space isn't causing the problem, which is what I proved by using the same version. -- -Mark Wieder Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2

Re: account macro not working

2003-09-21 Thread Mark Wieder
Luc- Saturday, September 20, 2003, 3:01:51 PM, you wrote: L the macro. Now, all other account have only one name but this one has L two names seperated by a space. Could this by the reason why? L %ACCOUNT= Nope. My account on the well %account=the well works fine. -- -Mark

Re: account macro not working

2003-09-21 Thread Mark Wieder
MAU- Sunday, September 21, 2003, 11:29:22 AM, you wrote: M Perhaps the fact that you are using an unreleased version like 1.63 M Beta/7? Nope. Works for me *with* a space in the account and same version. -- -Mark Wieder Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack

Re[2]: Blocking Bat mail

2003-09-20 Thread Mark Partous
at all) would be virus, http://www.perl.com/language/misc/virus.html -- Best Wishes, Mark using The Bat! 2.00.6 Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: %To= macro and the address book

2003-09-18 Thread Mark L
%TO= %TO=%VAR_To Dear %ABToName -- Best regards, Mark mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TB! 2.00.6 on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 1 pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL information

Re: TB got bloated

2003-09-18 Thread Mark Wieder
. If you have a large number of messages in various folders this can take quite a bit of time, especially if you haven't compressed in a while. When things get slow I try to archive some of my older messages and just get them out of TB to speed things up. -- -Mark Wieder Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7

Re[4]: Message create date

2003-09-17 Thread Mark Partous
Hello Jack, Tuesday, September 16, 2003, 8:20:54 PM, you wrote: JM Mark, are you (or anyone else) aware of any program that will take the JM output from, say, TB's address book file and then let you PRINT it out JM in various common (or even custom) Address Book formats, e.g., the JM Franklin

Re: someone use v2 on NT4?

2003-09-17 Thread Mark Wieder
is out there (remember WinME?), but I *am* saying that I think it's unreasonable to expect every software developer to support older operating systems explicitly when even MS no longer does. -- -Mark Wieder Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2

Re: someone use v2 on NT4?

2003-09-16 Thread Mark Wieder
an OS that Microsoft itself won't support anymore is asking a bit much. http://www.microsoft.com/ntserver/ProductInfo/Availability/Retiring.asp -- -Mark Wieder Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 Current

Re: More SmartBat/Scheduler monkeybusiness

2003-09-16 Thread Mark L
to selected text? The Close pad I find useful as you can then reopen Pads to edit them further. -- Best regards, Mark mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TB! 2.00.6 on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 1 pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re[2]: Message create date

2003-09-16 Thread Mark Partous
to import address books from but I've not yet found RG how to export address books TO text from either competing email app. Did you try Dawn yet (freeware)? http://www.joshie.com/projects/dawn/ Or is this not what you were looking for? -- Best Wishes, Mark using

Re: Message headers

2003-09-11 Thread Mark L
Hello Mark, Wednesday, September 10, 2003, 5:00:21 PM, you wrote: M The ability to add and edit message headers looks kind of neat. M I have been racking my brains to come up with some innovative M uses for this technology, but am struggling. Anyone have any M inspired uses for this? I use

Re: put received date in templates

2003-09-11 Thread Mark L
it be possible to put: %REGEXPMATCH=%SUBPATT='0' That just gives me the whole header. Is it possible to run a macro against incoming mail? Any pointers gratefully received. -- Best regards, Mark mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TB! 2.00.6 on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 1

Re: Access violation in Account - Properties

2003-09-11 Thread Mark Wieder
? That's cleared up some stuff for me before. -- -Mark Wieder Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Access violation in Account - Properties

2003-09-11 Thread Mark Wieder
, too, but I'd back them up just to be safe, then delete them when prompted by the uninstall process. -- -Mark Wieder Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL information: http

Re: wrapping cookies problem

2003-09-11 Thread Mark Adams
with the quotes the other way round! %WRAPPED=%COOKIE='t:\the bat\quotes.txt' works here! -- Mark Adams | Computer Systems Acemake Computers | Network Support Taming Technology | Bespoke Programming The man who goes alone can start today; but he who

Re: Odd mini Bat2 Bug with window minimisation

2003-09-10 Thread Mark L
Hello Mark, Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 6:51:56 PM, you wrote: M Dear Bats M Here is an odd bug. Can anyone verify. M I have the bat set to minimise to the taskbar (rather than the M system tray) although I doubt this makes a difference. M The standard windows keyboard shortcut for minimising

Different use of %FROM in version 2.0

2003-09-10 Thread Mark
%FROM Any thoughts? Mark Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Message headers

2003-09-10 Thread Mark
The ability to add and edit message headers looks kind of neat. I have been racking my brains to come up with some innovative uses for this technology, but am struggling. Anyone have any inspired uses for this? Mark Current version is 2.00

Re: Access violation in Account - Properties

2003-09-10 Thread Mark Wieder
a broken copy didn't work - I had to uninstall the existing copy, then install the new one to clear up some problems. -- -Mark Wieder Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL

The URL prefix

2003-09-09 Thread Mark Adams
as cutting and pasting URL's is getting to be a pain! Regards Mark -- Mark Adams | Computer Systems Acemake Computers | Network Support Taming Technology | Bespoke Programming You mean we're not gonna score? We came all this way and we're not gonna

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >