On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 12:54:04 -0700, Bill McQuillan wrote:
I have noticed that TB puts:
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
SNIP
Has anybody found a trick to get rid of this ugly field?
If you really hate this header you could try loading thebat.exe in a
HEX-editor and null out all 2 (Low), 4 (Normal) and
On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 08:45:57 +0700, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
Anyone else having trouble logging onto the subject website?
Since Years, but there is nobody which is able to fix it with a new
Coding of the Scripts...
It's Leif's site, and I think he doesn't read this list any more. I'll
contact
On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 10:24:45 +0200, Jens Franik wrote:
[Two TB! versions on one machine]
Or maybe run the second one under sandboxie
You have to run both under Sandboxie, because every Application in the
Sandbox can read the Registry outside of the Host Machine...
Then try installing
On Mon, 6 Jul 2009 23:40:24 +0700, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
I tried them in TB 4.2.6 but unfortunataly my Windows doesn't speak
Thai.
I think if you'd tried 4.0.28 (which is not possible, but hey), your
Windows would have spoken Thai.
Yes, it does. I never bothered experimenting with exotic
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 21:02:33 +0700, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
Thanks for your confirmations. I have sent a PM to Max ans Stef, as my
assingment is due on Saturday but I don't even know what I have to
do...
You might try to install version 4.0.x seperately and then apply
the unix mbx export-import
On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 11:14:58 +1000, Robin Anson wrote:
If you want to add, for example, 'X-Newheader' to your message headers, and
you use %HDRX-Newheader with a value of string=n in your template, you'd
add the following, right?
%HDRX-Newheader=string=n
No, you need to use the macro
On Sun, 5 Jul 2009 07:05:25 +0700, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
AdG I don't know about your set-up, but in my situation I would try
AdG this:
Thanks for your idea, but it seems a bit unfeasable:
Yes, I suspected it already. When I used TB on a regular basis, I
filtered incoming mail directly to unix
On Sat, 4 Jul 2009 21:17:36 +0700, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
Problem is that the first message (and other messages alike) do not
display correctly above 4.0.28. Is there a way to downgrade?
I don't know about your set-up, but in my situation I would try
this:
1) Add a new Virtual Folder and
On Sun, 28 Jun 2009 23:27:33 +0700, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
Ritlabs, having the same market power as Apple, does not need to ship
an updated manual with each release. Somebody will write it in their
free time. In the meantime, we use Google.
There hasn't been a new Beta! version for almost two
On Sun, 14 Jun 2009 18:00:37 +0200, Marek Mikus wrote:
Let's not go nit-picking over which headers need changing or not.
You wrote examples and I am telling You, these are bad samples, because
such headers are internal and must conform RFC.
I agree. Reply-To would have been a better example.
On Sat, 13 Jun 2009 01:15:38 +0200, Marek Mikus wrote:
What wonders me is why there are three different macro's (two of which
don't seem to work properly) that arguably serve the same purpose.
Typical known redundancy :-)
%HDRheader returns current message header
%HDRheader=text and %ADDHEADER
On Sat, 13 Jun 2009 09:07:42 -0700, Bill McQuillan wrote:
My guess is that the %HDR macros were the first attempt to allow this
capabiity, but when it was discovered that the parser couldn't handle an
embedded - the %ADDHEADER and %SETHEADER macros were created which used a
quoted string for the
On zaterdag 13 juni 2009, 9:54:10 PM Marek Mikus wrote,
You can not change Message-ID and there is no need to change
In-Reply-To header which includes Message-ID of replied message.
Let's not go nit-picking over which headers need changing or not.
(X-Rogue is a header that doesn't need adding
On Saturday June 13 2009, 9:57:51 PM Marek Mikus wrote,
it is known that %HDR macro doesn't allow special chars and this
note is included in help.
I've been wondering about that. What is meant by special characters?
Does there exist A Definition Of special characters? I don't know.
Personally
On vrijdag 12 juni 2009, 1:02:20 AM Marek Mikus wrote,
I think this might be a bug in the %HDR macro but I'm not absolutely
sure. Maybe it needs some extra ()'s or s to make it work. I don't
know.
no, this macro doesn't allow dash, use %ADDHEADER(RFC Name,Value)
instead.
I tried using
Hello fellow TBUDlers,
TB! has the possibility to add user-defined headers to messages. First
you have to define these headers (Options - Preferences -
Viewer/Editor - Message Headers), then you can use these headers by
inserting the associated macro into a template.
The header definition
On Friday 8 februari 2008, 12:51 Martin Schuster wrote:
I would simply like to install the latest and best 3.x version
and live happily with it for the next years.
Any opinions on which one to use? Which version proofed to
contain the least number of bugs?
I would say v3.98.4. That one is
On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 08:05:23 +0200, Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
I call it stupid because it serves no purpose whatsoever. No
other mail-client that I know of understands it, no e-mail
user that I know of cares about it. It's just code sitting in
there for nothing.
Well, I know of other email
On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 16:52:06 +0200, Roelof Otten wrote:
GSIs this going to affect message threading?
No. Not for TB and other threading mail clients.
For non-threading mail clients that only thread/sort on
subject it might improve threading.
However, other mail clients DO have a problem when
On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 18:15:27 +0200, Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
In short, this Re: numbering is non-RFC
Can you point me to the RFC that says reply prefixes *MUST NOT*
contain these numbers?
RFC-2822 has this to say:
3.6.5. Informational fields
[...] The Subject: field is the most common and
On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 15:25:45 -0400, David Calvarese wrote:
Its configurable, so what. Maybe it should be off by default
though.
That doesn't make it any less superfluous or stupid.
I never have understood why we had that option to begin with.
That's always one of the first things I do on
On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 22:53:46 +0200, Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
If I understand correctly, it implies: you MAY use 1 instance of
Re: in a reply, but you SHOULD NOT use other strings as it can
lead to undesirable consequences.
That is one interpretation. :-) Another fine example of an RFC that
On Mon, 20 Jun 2005 23:54:09 +0200, Mica Mijatovic wrote:
[Parked drafts in Outbox]
In my case, recently, I found several of them (the wildly sent
ones) still interesting, for various reasons, although
outdated, and had unparked them in order to move them in
other folder, and perhaps later
On Mon, 30 May 2005 14:19:14 -0400, Victor B. Gonzalez wrote:
My email address was [EMAIL PROTECTED] unfortunately now, it
is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How did that happen?
Did you accidentally install WinXP SP2?
Arjan
--
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
On Sat, 28 May 2005 13:50:33 +0100, MFPA wrote:
Rule of thumb: all versions with two or more dots are Beta
versions.
3.0.1.33 has three dots and was the version for sale on the
Ritlabs website when I upgraded from v2.
Version 3.0.1.33 is the latest of the 3.0 Post Release Beta
series, that
On Thu, 26 May 2005 22:49:30 -0400, Roman Katzer wrote:
V. 3.5.17 (now 3.5.18) is officially a beta. To read about it,
subscribe to TBBETA. To download it, register as a beta
tester.
Ah. I was confused because the list server added lines speak of
3.5.0.17 not as a beta.
It's a Post Release
On Sun, 3 Apr 2005 22:47:23 +0200, Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
If you don't open attachments, and you configure your browser
to disallow active content, and you block all incoming ports
that are a potential security risk (you can essentially block
_all_ ports on a PC that is used only as a
On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 05:01:00 -0500, Mary Bull wrote:
I notice that the references are growing and growing in messages
that I exchange with other people via replies (I reply, he
replies, I reply, he replies). Is there any way to put an upper
limit on the number of references included in the
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 23:16:46 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I leave betas well alone - I earn a lot of money keeping a lot of
clients very happy using The Bat and its filters. I cannot afford
instability.
Then you should not use BayesIt _at all_. As the version numbers
say, _all_ BI versions
Hello Michael,
Friday, September 3, 2004, 11:34:26 AM, you wrote:
Well, in a purely technical sense Ritlabs did indeed keep its
promise. []
[Snip]
Promising features for one version, selling that version with just
alpha-character features and releasing a new version that only differs
from
On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 14:58:03 +0100, Morgan Pugh wrote:
As for what Ritlabs said they would do feature wise in TB! it
depends if it was a true contract or just features they are
planning on adding/fixing.
Well, in a purely technical sense Ritlabs did indeed keep its
promise. A lot of bugs
On Wed, 4 Aug 2004 19:56:29 -0700, Michael L. Wilson wrote:
There is now a new Yahoo group for the purpose of testing The Bat!
features, including macros, templates, signatures (even really,
really, really long ones).
Nice! Can I test my macro %APPENDCOMPLETEBIBLE on your new Yahoo
group?
On Wed, 4 Aug 2004 14:46:18 -0700, Darrin Rich wrote:
[Colour filter doesn't colour]
It must be the Inbox-known filter. [..]
Any Ideas?
Try moving the Known filter to the bottom of the filter list
and then apply the Advanced option [ ] Address(es) must be
listed in the addres book to the
On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 17:33:17 +0200, Peter Meyns wrote:
Nevertheless your .sig is TOO LONG.
[Leif's TOO LONG .sig]
That's 8 (EIGHT) lines TOO MANY.
I miss a smiley in your post.
It's there though. Press Ctrl-Shift-K (RFC-822 Headers)
and you will see it.
Good thing we're not on the usenet!
On Sat, 17 Jul 2004 16:46:44 +1000, John Phillips wrote:
Just for fun (?), I ran the PcCillin free scan on my pc [ ]
and for the third time in a row, it picked up two viruses (virii?)
in Bat attachments which AVG missed.
Just stating AVG missed two viruses isn't very helpful. What
viruses are
On Sat, 17 Jul 2004 12:18:28 -0400, Wolffe wrote:
[...] I convinced her to buy AVG 7. It removed the trojan and
several copies of some other nasty little critters than neither
Norton nor AVG 6 found. Pattern files for both were up to date.
Another unsubstantiated claim. I want facts, not
On Sat, 17 Jul 2004 16:38:20 -0400, Wolffe wrote:
Another unsubstantiated claim. I want facts, not hearsay.
So, can you tell me the names of those nasty critters?
That was about 3 months ago. All I remember was seeing a list of
53 infected files found and the viruses varied. The one that
On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 07:56:11 +1000, John Phillips wrote:
Just stating AVG missed two viruses isn't very helpful. What
viruses are you talking about?
Netsky variation, and BugBear
I have received numerous mail-copies of Bugbear and most of the
Netsky alphabet and the AVG plug-in has never let
On Sat, 17 Jul 2004 19:57:21 -0600, Leif Gregory wrote:
Nice try... But it did have one. My name just happened
to be above it, everything else below.
Nevertheless your .sig is TOO LONG.
--
Cheers,
Leif Gregory
List Moderator (and fellow registered end-user)
PCWize Editor / ICQ
On Wed, 14 Jul 2004 18:09:58 -0500, Allie Martin wrote:
Yes have now... exactly the same - total freeze - only way
out is to stop the process using CTRL_ALT_DEL.
Sounds like POPFile is having a problem with the new version.
... or the other way round.
Arjan
--
[Non-text portions of this
On Wed, 14 Jul 2004 16:15:01 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Checking 38 accounts freezes TB! 2.12]
I am also autochecking multiple accounts and using Popfile,
but it works without problems on my machine.
So it's probably not that then.
Well I don't know what it might be then.
Anyone
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 09:07:35 +0200, Roelof Otten wrote:
GM Who doesn't use mark as junk at least 5 times a day?
I don't.
Me neither. Spampal takes care of the junk marking all by
itself.
I don't use any spam filter at all, I don't get as much as
five spams a week and yes, I've been on line
On Sun, 6 Jun 2004 09:08:18 +1200, Allister Jenks wrote:
The compression/purge used to run very slowly for my first account
until I repaired it. Now that TB! has thrown away about 3/4 of my
inbox in the repair process, the whole compression/purge is a lot
more timely. You win some, you lose
On Thu, 6 May 2004 22:10:36 +0700, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
How do I get access to the messages in my folders named test?
Do this:
[Snip]
This should also work:
1) Create a new folder select it.
2) Choose Tools - Import Messages - From The Bat! Message Base
(.TBB-Files)...
3) Find in TB!
On Sun, 2 May 2004 15:29:55 +0200, Mark Partous wrote:
[Snip]
But if there is one thing worse than Spam, it must be blacklists.
I can understand your, uhm.. reservations, but on the other hand:
blacklists are a _fact_. So why not use them for my own benefit?
It is my own free choice and it
On Sat, 01 May 2004 20:49:31 -0500, Jonathan E. Brickman wrote:
So far, the best approach I have found thus far for TB is the
Bayes Filter Plugin (by Achim Winkler) plus SpamBayes. [etc]
Just wondering why everyone seems so obsessed with Bayesian
filtering. I'm using SpamPal. which has the
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 12:04:33 +0100, Marten Gallagher wrote:
OF COURSE (AND I AM DELIBERATELY SHOUTING) IF WE HAD A SYSTEM OF
CHANGING ACCOUNT PROPERTIES ACROSS ALL ACCOUNTS AT ONCE THIS
WOULDN'T BE A PROBLEM...
Nonsense.
???
You want to turn TB! into some kind of mailserver. TB! is not a
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 00:19:14 +0100, Marten Gallagher wrote:
Has anyone got any experience of running TB with POPFile *and* XRay
(to select SMTP server).
I have experience with TB! with SpamPal with FTGate 2.2 *and* X-Ray,
all running seemlessly together.
From loking at the documentation for
On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 18:22:24 -0500, Mary Bull wrote:
Presently I'm staying with two tbudl filters, one with the string
of the changed Reply to: and one with the string of the old Reply
to: ,to which tbudl is now reverted.
Just for the record. I'm using this:
Strings: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 21 Apr 2004 11:15:29 +1000, Ian A. White wrote:
Stranger still. This message was picked up as spam, but your other
reply was not.
Now one thing common to both messages is the word SpamPal in
unquoted text so I am wondering if when this message gets to the
list it is gets flagged as
On Tue, 20 Apr 2004 13:53:31 +0100, Marten Gallagher wrote:
I've re0installed BayesIt 503 and it is immediately sending
all TBUDL mail to the Junk folder.
Is someone laughing somewhere there at the back.
Just 1 simple advice: give SpamPal a try.
http://www.spampal.org
Arjan
--
[Non-text
On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 15:36:43 +0200, Peter Fjelsten wrote:
I get mail from a lot of people who have huge problems with
quoting correctly (i.e. top-posting), so I find myself constantly
selecting a lot of quoted text below the cursor and hitting delete
to delete all the bottom quotes.
[Snip
On Sun, 29 Feb 2004 23:54:42 +0100, dAniel hAhler wrote:
Some featurewishes came into mind during this:
- Filters that do not have to move a message!
This is very bad design. You can get around this by setting source
and dest folder to the same, but that does not help for shortcut
On Mon, 23 Feb 2004 09:59:33 -0600, Greg Strong wrote:
| I am no expert on View Modes (VM), but I'll give it a shot.
| As I understand it you have 3 places where you can apply VM.
| 1 Main Window
| 2 View Folder FolderName of AcctName
| 3 Browse Ticker Messages
I actually found out 2 more
On Wed, 25 Feb 2004 20:14:03 -0600, Greg Strong wrote:
|3 Browse Ticker Messages
... snip
6 Browse Ticker Messages
6 = 3
Oh shoot!
(Next step: why does KPF block incoming mail from local
network?)
Arjan
--
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
On Tue, 20 Jan 2004 08:11:44 -0500, Allie Martin wrote:
The only solution I can think of is to patiently wait for the
upcoming release. Issues with the view modes have been just
about fully dealt with.
Just about ... but not quite.
Arjan
--
Beta 40 still says: Access Violation at address
On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 00:47:22 +0700, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
Can someone forward the Unsubscribe info to me!
Just highlight any message of this list and go to Specials /
Mailing List / Unsubscribe in the main menu.
Not available in Main Window when Message Auto-view isn't
selected.
see:
On Wed, 7 Jan 2004 19:20:33 -0600, Kitty wrote:
It's just a new spammers trick to circumvent Bayesian filter
detection. Press F9 to see the raw message body and you most
probably will find an HTML-ized URL like this one:
Bingo. Had a message like that and when I did F9 the below
popped up. I
On Tue, 6 Jan 2004 16:44:23 -0600, Kitty wrote:
First, I get several messages a day from a variety of different
supposed authors that just have random words and nothing else.
I don't really understand the purpose of this spam unless it is
to just see if the mail bounces back or something.
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003 00:14:24 +, Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
[Unprofessionalisms in TB!]
To me, it sounds almost like fussing about the bad design of
the indicator stalk in a Ferrari.
Your insertion of the word almost made me sigh with relief. ;-)
(I wouldn't dream of buying a Ferrari model
In mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Gordon
Woolf wrote:
A reply to one message is defaulting to base64 encoding, even
if I create a new message and just paste in a part of the text
of the original message and even if that text is saved via
Notepad or NoteTab.
Just to let you know you're not the only
In mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Mary Bull wrote:
M Please enjoy! :-)
Thanks, I shall. [snip]
A lot of fuzz about a couple of weeks off (if I may
say so).
Arjan (silly subjects 're us)
Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information:
In mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to install The Bat on to the laptop, download
e-mail from the server, and, eventually, transfer all of the
downloaded e-mail to the pc with The Bat, when I return. Is
this possible?
Yes, it is.
If so, how do I do this?
My
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Rob Mebus wrote:
Just want you guys to know that Service Pack 1 for Windows XP is
out.
Hmm... I've just hot-fixed my XP with the latest security
patches.
It includes the possibility to really designate The Bat! (or any
other mail client) as the
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Jan Rifkinson wrote:
After having to replace my HD, I am now constructing a *serious*
backup strategy. Part of that strategy includes concentrating as
much data as I can within the My Documents settings folder so I
can backup that folder on a regular
On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 08:26:45PM +0545, Sudip Pokhrel wrote:
[Right-click popup reply quoted text option]
Maybe I'm the only one that feels this way though:)
No :) There have been much talk regarding this; search the archives.
IIRC, someone from Ritlabs has also pointed out why this
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 07:03:17PM +0200, Dierk Haasis wrote:
Actually I've just set the option None under
Account/Properties/Templates/Reply/Sender information...
Thanks for pointing that out. It let me discover another new
feature, i.e. the item Use reply numbering in the subject line.
Now I
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Lynn Turriff wrote:
[The Reply quoting selected text right-click menu option]
That's the long way round your elbow to get to your thumb, though.
Easier to learn F4 ... easier still if it were right on the right
click menu on the mail ...
Yes I know
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Roelof Otten wrote:
ECIs it possible that Exporting to .EML doesn't work properly?
Reproduces here.
Same here.
Assigned a hotkey and I got a pop-up to select a folder, but I
got an error and no files were saved. No matter what pane was
selected.
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Adam Rykala wrote:
The sad fact is, its normal email etiquette...exacerbated by
poor email clients that do not bottom post by default.
...
--
. - .. - - - - - - - - - - - -
/Adam \__/ Rykala
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Razgo wrote:
So all suggestions on the way you guys handle backup copies of
your email is appreciated.
My favourite backup-method is to save the messages to Unix
Mailbox format:
You can do this in two ways:
1) Select all messages you want to backup
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Headless
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to add a filter that filters all messages that have
more than one addressee in the To: or CC: fields. Anyone know if
this is possible and how do I do it?
Hint: addresses in the To: and Cc: fields
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Jim D [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is a really good one: Kill all e-mail originating from these
domains:
.+aol\.com
.+@yahoo.+
.+@msn\.com
.+@.*mail.*
.+@excite.+
.+@[0-9]+\.
I am going to butt in here and ask a question. I am not sure how
[Please ignore previous mail!]
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Jim D [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is a really good one: Kill all e-mail originating from these
domains:
.+aol\.com
.+@yahoo.+
.+@msn\.com
.+@.*mail.*
.+@excite.+
.+@[0-9]+\.
I am going to butt in here and
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Jonathan
Angliss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I really wouldn't know how to Reply Quoting selected text
when TB! is focused on the Message List pane!
If you have the message preview pane open, you can highlight in
there, and use that menu context.
Yes,
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Jonathan Angliss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Reply Quoting selected text]
Try this, highlight some text in a message, and hit F4, tada,
the exact behavior you just described. It replies using the
selected text, if some text is selected.
Yes, I know
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], I [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Anyway, there are more examples of weird or unexpected behaviour
in TB! Recently I assigned a shortcut (Shift-Ctrl-U) to the
menu-item: View - Display - Only Unread messages.
It turned out that this shortcut doesn't work if
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Michael A. Yetto
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmmm. But I would say that if I right click an email in the
folder pane and get Reply and Forward options, a Reply to
All would be appropriate?
If you aren't reading the message, how would you accurately
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Lynn Turriff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it is the duty of every subscriber to read every
message that is being potsted on TBUDL.
No. It is the right of every subscriber, but not the duty. I
read the first and maybe second message of every
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Peter
Palmreuther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it is the duty of every subscriber to read every
message that is being potsted on TBUDL.
No. Simply No. Period. Nowhere is written I'm in duty to read
every mail coming through this list. And I think
In[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Lynn Turriff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd be curious. And I wonder too what ya do with threads with a
bunch of Unread status indicators, sort of glaring at you. And
liable to pull you back towards them depending how you're
advancing to
In mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Mike Dillinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How would I eliminate the References header in my mail
threads? I have no desire to sort by thread and I'm getting
complaints from my paranoid IT friends.
Victor Meldrew Mode
I don't believe it!
/Victor Meldrew Mode
Arjan
On Mon, 25 Sep 2000 05:02:55 -0700, Ming-Li wrote:
Though I appreciate Arjan's initiative, I don't think it's meant to
take such discussions away from TBUDL. It's not OT, and I'm not sure
RIT guys read TBOM. The bottom line is, I can't go set up, e.g.,
TBFLT, and say all discussion about filters
On Sun, 24 Sep 2000 23:05:54 +0100, Tony Boom wrote:
Can I, as a subscriber to a discussion list about The Bat e-mail
client, call upon the odd moderator or two, to ask that the Bat/Becky
comparison be moved onto TBOT or whatever the new Bat versus other
e-mail clients list is please.
TBOM!
On Sun, 24 Sep 2000 18:46:26 -0700, Jan Deppisch wrote:
[From the header:]
| Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2000 18:46:26 -0700
^
Do you live in Bangkok? I guess not.
[...] But in the message list columns, where the date or time of
the email is shown, only the other
On 23-09-2000, 19:06:45 -0700, Januk Aggarwal wrote:
[Re-importing messages]
Just import them into the Inbox and re-filter.
I don't know about you, but I have lots of messages which have been
manually sorted. There aren't enough commonalities to use automatic
filters on them.
In that
On 23-09-2000, 14:05:36 +0100, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
TBOT is The Bat Off-Topic discussion list. It is a list set up by one
of our members on egroups which takes the "overspill" conversations
from TBUDL and TBBETA.
And let's not forget the forthcoming split offs that, thanks to my
very own
On 23-09-2000, 16:14:03 +0100, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
AdGTBBRAG - boasting about TB.
I tried to join this list but was rejected with the following
disclaimer:
Subscription request for [EMAIL PROTECTED] rejected
You have been witnessed making less than flattering remarks in
On 22-09-2000, 02:02:53 +0200, Karin Spaink wrote:
IMHO this type of address based filtering can be accomplished in an
easier and more convenient way by using the Address Book as a filter
source.
That's quite a pearl. Thank you! Not because I want to filter out
spam this way - addresses change
On 22-09-2000, 14:11:54 +0800, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
Please do let us know whether it works with Agent yet
Here it didn't. Major multiple GPF.
And everything that is beta is AYOR, of course.
Beta!? I'd rather call it "ExperiMental"!
Arjan
--
Emoticons withheld.
--
On 22-09-2000, 21:25:58 +0200, Peter Steiner wrote:
[Exporting all messages into 1 big mailbox file]
For regaining your folder structure you will need a very advanced
filtering system... ;-)
You could keep a copy of the Account.srx file with the mailbox file
and when you want to
On 22-09-2000, 18:50:27 -0700, Januk Aggarwal wrote:
If multiple folders were exported at the same time, the messages
would get mixed up into one mail box. So when you go to import, they
would all be in the same folder.
Just import them into the Inbox and re-filter.
Arjan
--
--
On 21-09-2000, 11:14:59 +0100, Graham wrote:
Heres a serious suggestion about The Editor. Couldn't future 1.4x
versions of TB allow an external text editor to be used if required.
Can be done already. Actually it is quite easy. What you need is a
keyboard macro program that has the ability to
On 21-09-2000, 00:00:01 +0700, tracer wrote:
I would want to suggest that if someone forks the actual money out
you also send him a 10 day extension to the bat so that at least his
email stays working...
And how... By e-mail?
Arjan
--
--
On 21-09-2000, 21:56:03 +0100, Graham wrote:
I'll look into Keyboard Express, but I really wanted something that
would allow me to use an external program as an editor, but acted
like it was part of the Bat.
Well uhm... Why not consider it a plug-in, just like those PGP dll's?
;-)
On Thursday, August 31, 2000 18:31:57, Nick Danger wrote:
Here's the BIG problem. It crashed without deleting the file from the
server since it never got that far along. I'm set up to check mail on
start up. So it starts up checks, crashes. I have about 5-7
seconds in which to work. I'm
On Thursday, August 31, 2000 21:24:04, I wrote:
- Start Windows Explorer and open C:\...\TheBat_dir\Account_dir
Oops! That should have been: C:\...\TheBat_dir\Mail\Account_dir.
Arjan
--
--
View the TBUDL archive at
On Sat, 26 Aug 2000 15:29:43 +0200, Peter Steiner wrote:
I never had these problems. There were other problems with exports and
imports, but the ones i know of are fixed in the latest stable release
1.45 (and there were some improvements. you can now export with the
Save As dialog). I see you
98 matches
Mail list logo
