Re: Filter issue

2009-09-29 Thread MFPA
Hi On Tuesday 29 September 2009 at 6:33:22 AM, in mid:795040109.20090929073...@dbnmail.co.za, Roger Phillips wrote: Hello MFPA, Monday, September 28, 2009, 7:24:04 PM, among other things, you wrote: M I am going mad :( - Have you put the test filter at the head of the filter queue?

Re: Filter issue

2009-09-28 Thread Jens Franik
Guten Tag Tom, am Sonntag, 27. September 2009 um 23:51 schrieben Sie: I tried to simplify the filter purely for testing - it's now if sender contains nam...@gmail.com move to folder XZY I am testing this on one highlighted message via refilter selected folder with the relevant boxes

Re: Filter issue

2009-09-28 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Tom, @28-Sep-2009, 07:51 +1000 (27-Sep 22:51 here) Tom [T] in mid:1324329289.20090928075...@sunnysydney.com said to Roger: ... snip T I tried to simplify the filter purely for testing - it's now T if sender contains nam...@gmail.com T move to folder XZY T I am testing this on one

Re: Filter issue

2009-09-28 Thread MFPA
Hi On Sunday 27 September 2009 at 10:51:25 PM, in mid:1324329289.20090928075...@sunnysydney.com, Tom wrote: I am going mad :( - It gets like that sometimes. I tried to simplify the filter purely for testing - it's now if sender contains nam...@gmail.com move to folder XZY Have you

Re: Filter issue

2009-09-28 Thread Roger Phillips
Hello MFPA, Monday, September 28, 2009, 7:24:04 PM, among other things, you wrote: M I am going mad :( - Have you put the test filter at the head of the filter queue? That is always the best place for testing as it eliminates the possibility of interference by other filters as

Re: Filter issue

2009-09-27 Thread Roger Phillips
Hello Tom, Saturday, September 26, 2009, 2:13:10 PM, among other things, you wrote: T Still no luck, tried to change it to T header field to or cc or bcc and sender contains ... but still T some messages won't budge. It looks as though something has perhaps become corrupted. Why not try

Re: Filter issue

2009-09-27 Thread MFPA
Hi On Friday 25 September 2009 at 4:55:53 PM, in mid:632520461.20090925175...@gmx.de, Jens Franik wrote: Guten Tag MFPA, am Freitag, 25. September 2009 um 16:41 schrieben Sie: Using The Bat! v4.0.38 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Current

Re: Filter issue

2009-09-27 Thread Jens Franik
Guten Tag MFPA, am Sonntag, 27. September 2009 um 12:52 schrieben Sie: I *am* using The Bat! v4.0.38 That is what i have been wondering about, TNX. -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen Jens Franik mailto:je...@gmx.de The Bat! 4.2.10.12 + AntiSpamSniper 3.2.1.5 + Gaijin XMP Makro Plugin 1.2

Re: Filter issue

2009-09-27 Thread Tom
Sunday, September 27, 2009, 4:49:19 PM, you wrote: It looks as though something has perhaps become corrupted. Why not try writing a completely new filter from scratch? I am going mad :( - I tried to simplify the filter purely for testing - it's now if sender contains nam...@gmail.com

Re: Filter issue

2009-09-26 Thread Tom
Saturday, September 26, 2009, 12:41:17 AM, you wrote: Hi On Friday 25 September 2009 at 12:21:00 AM, in mid:415057556.20090924182...@fastmail.fm, Stuart Cuddy wrote: Hello Tom, Thursday, September 24, 2009, 5:06:04 PM, you wrote: T I have however tried some radical changes and even T

Re: Filter issue

2009-09-25 Thread MFPA
Hi On Friday 25 September 2009 at 12:21:00 AM, in mid:415057556.20090924182...@fastmail.fm, Stuart Cuddy wrote: Hello Tom, Thursday, September 24, 2009, 5:06:04 PM, you wrote: T I have however tried some radical changes and even T for these some messages do not move: T if header contains

Re: Filter issue

2009-09-25 Thread Jens Franik
Guten Tag MFPA, am Freitag, 25. September 2009 um 16:41 schrieben Sie: Using The Bat! v4.0.38 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Current version is 4.2.10.0 Error or Truth? -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen Jens Franik mailto:je...@gmx.de The Bat!

Re: Filter issue

2009-09-24 Thread Jens Franik
Guten Tag Tom, am Donnerstag, 24. September 2009 um 04:38 schrieben Sie: I cannot figure out how to set the rule so that it works even if the email was sent to y, z, a, b and c. If you do not see the Filter Condition in the To: or Cc: Field, you have to parse the Headers. But simply

Re: Filter issue

2009-09-24 Thread MFPA
Hi On Thursday 24 September 2009 at 3:38:09 AM, in mid:415846758.20090924123...@sunnysydney.com, Tom wrote: I set up a filter to move incoming emails to a special account if sender contains xx and recipient contains y. This works well if the recipient is only y. I cannot figure out how to

Re: Filter issue

2009-09-24 Thread m2gdh
Hiya T I set up a filter to move incoming emails to a special account if T sender contains xx and recipient contains y. T This works well if the recipient is only y. I cannot figure out how T to set the rule so that it works even if the T email was sent to y, z, T a, b and c. Assuming I have I

Re: Filter issue

2009-09-24 Thread Tom
Thursday, September 24, 2009, 11:41:38 PM, you wrote: A few thoughts:- Is y an email address or a name? If a name, is it stated slightly differently in the email sent to y, z, a, b and c that does not end up in the folder you want? Assuming y is your address, are any of z, a, b or c

Re: Filter issue

2009-09-24 Thread Stuart Cuddy
Hello Tom, Thursday, September 24, 2009, 5:06:04 PM, you wrote: T I have however tried some radical changes and even for these some T messages do not move: T if header contains j@company.com T and sender match sharyn...@isp.com T move to folder ABC You may not want to use Match as I think

Filter issue

2009-09-23 Thread Tom
Hello Everyone, I set up a filter to move incoming emails to a special account if sender contains xx and recipient contains y. This works well if the recipient is only y. I cannot figure out how to set the rule so that it works even if the email was sent to y, z, a, b and c. -- Best regards,

Re: Filter issue

2009-09-23 Thread Roger Phillips
Hello Tom, Thursday, September 24, 2009, 4:38:09 AM, among other things, you wrote: T I set up a filter to move incoming emails to a special account if T sender contains xx and recipient contains y. T This works well if the recipient is only y. I cannot figure out how T to set the rule so that

Re: Reply/macro/filter issue

2008-06-26 Thread Tom
Thursday, June 26, 2008, 2:58:14 PM, you wrote: Hello Tom, Thursday, June 26, 2008, 7:03:25 AM, you wrote: So, I either need to amend the salutation manually or go into the addressbook to remove the duplicate entry for Paul (it's duplicate as the email address is always the same, just the

Re: Reply/macro/filter issue

2008-06-26 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Tom, On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 11:33:25 +1000GMT (26-6-2008, 3:33 +0200, where I live), you wrote: T However each time I receive a new email from the _paul or paul-xyz T addresses, they also end in my address book as new addresses In that case just stop adding all addresses to your address

Re: Reply/macro/filter issue

2008-06-26 Thread Jack S. LaRosa
Hello Tom, Thursday, June 26, 2008, 3:22:54 AM, you wrote: T Sorry, you are right, my quoting these addresses was incorrect. The address T appears as follows: T _Paul XYZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] T Paul-XYZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] T I think there was a third version but I cannot find it quickly. The T

Reply/macro/filter issue

2008-06-25 Thread Tom
Hello Everyone, I raised this issue before and while I understand the cause now, I have not yet fully solved the problem. Here is my problem: One of my contact is using the same email address @xyztrading.com with different prefixes (not sure why). So while most of his emails come in as [EMAIL

Re: Reply/macro/filter issue

2008-06-25 Thread Mean Drake
Hello Tom, Thursday, June 26, 2008, 7:03:25 AM, you wrote: So, I either need to amend the salutation manually or go into the addressbook to remove the duplicate entry for Paul (it's duplicate as the email address is always the same, just the way it appears changes with the various prefixes).