off then, or are you using fast user switching?
I am logged off. I seldom use fast user switching because if I remain
logged on and simply switch users, K9 won't even start when she logs
on. You get some kind of error message whose text I can't remember
right now. Apparently K9 can be used
fast user switching because if I remain
logged on and simply switch users, K9 won't even start when she logs
on. You get some kind of error message whose text I can't remember
right now. Apparently K9 can be used by only one user at a time.
Thats why I was asking, but since you're aware
Hello Jack S. LaRosa everyone else,
on 11-Dez-2006 at 00:23 you (Jack S. LaRosa) wrote:
The problem (which only recently started) occurs when My wife selects
herself from the Win logon screen.
Are you logged off then, or are you using fast user switching?
--
Best regards,
Alexander
off then, or are you using fast user switching?
I am logged off. I seldom use fast user switching because if I remain
logged on and simply switch users, K9 won't even start when she logs
on. You get some kind of error message whose text I can't remember
right now. Apparently K9 can be used by only
Hello Peter,
Thursday, September 28, 2006, 8:02:14 PM, you wrote:
Peter Hello Granville Cousins,
Peter on Thu, 28 Sep 2006 14:41:26 +0100 (2006-09-28 15:41:26 in .nl) in the
Peter message with reference
Peter mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] you [GC]
Peter wrote (at least in part):
I am using K9 Spam
Hello Peter,
Thursday, September 28, 2006, 8:02:14 PM, you wrote:
Peter Hello Granville Cousins,
Peter on Thu, 28 Sep 2006 14:41:26 +0100 (2006-09-28 15:41:26 in .nl) in the
Peter message with reference
Peter mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] you [GC]
Peter wrote (at least in part):
I am using K9 Spam
Hi Granville,
on Sat, 30 Sep 2006 10:41:55 +0100GMT (30.09.2006, 11:41 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:
GC Thursday, September 28, 2006, 8:02:14 PM, you wrote:
GC Can you tell me where I can view the X-Text-Classification: spam
GC marker in emails that have been designated as Spam by The Bat!?
GC
Hallo Granville,
On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 10:41:55 +0100GMT (30-9-2006, 11:41 , where I
live), you wrote:
GC Can you tell me where I can view the X-Text-Classification: spam
GC marker in emails that have been designated as Spam by The Bat!?
GC This is just to see that it is working correctly.
Press
Hello Roelof,
Saturday, September 30, 2006, 11:33:34 AM, you wrote:
Roelof Hallo Granville,
Roelof On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 10:41:55 +0100GMT (30-9-2006, 11:41 , where I
Roelof live), you wrote:
GC Can you tell me where I can view the X-Text-Classification: spam
GC marker in emails that have been
On 26 Sep 2006, at 11:09, Marten Gallagher wrote:
Hello TBUDL,
I am using K9 Spam filter on my machine running Windows 2000. Is it
possible to configure The Bat! to Filter my email by adding:
X-Text-Classification: - to the Header line.
Yes
I have ticked this option
in Configuration/K9
Hello Granville Cousins everyone else,
on 28-Sep-2006 at 15:41 you (Granville Cousins) wrote:
Where can I find this configuration in The Bat! filters section? I have
looked in there and cannot see any place where I can request The Bat!
to filter my email using the header classification. I
Hello Roelof Otten everyone else,
on 26-Sep-2006 at 17:21 you (Roelof Otten) wrote:
The first step to follow Peter's instructions would be to upgrade to
v3, what Peter suggested can't be done with your 1.62r
But only the part with the common filters.
He doesn't need to upgrade to v3 to
Hello TBUDL,
I am using K9 Spam filter on my machine running Windows 2000. Is it
possible to configure The Bat! to Filter my email by adding:
X-Text-Classification: - to the Header line. I have ticked this option
in Configuration/K9 but then am lost as to how to get this to work
with The Bat
Hello TBUDL,
I am using K9 Spam filter on my machine running Windows 2000. Is it
possible to configure The Bat! to Filter my email by adding:
X-Text-Classification: - to the Header line.
Yes
I have ticked this option
in Configuration/K9 but then am lost as to how to get this to work
Hello Peter,
Tuesday, September 26, 2006, 10:55:31 AM, you wrote:
Peter Hi Granville,
Peter on Tue, 26 Sep 2006 09:44:50 +0100GMT (26.09.2006, 10:44 +0200GMT here),
Peter you wrote:
GC I am using K9 Spam filter on my machine running Windows 2000. Is it
GC possible to configure The Bat
Hallo Granville,
On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 11:09:03 +0100GMT (26-9-2006, 12:09 , where I
live), you wrote:
GC Can't quite figure out how to do that in The Bat!. Could you give me a
GC littel more step by step help please?
The first step to follow Peter's instructions would be to upgrade to
v3, what
Hi Granville,
on Tue, 26 Sep 2006 09:44:50 +0100GMT (26.09.2006, 10:44 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:
GC I am using K9 Spam filter on my machine running Windows 2000. Is it
GC possible to configure The Bat! to Filter my email by adding:
GC X-Text-Classification: - to the Header line. I have ticked
Can't quite figure out how to do that in The Bat!. Could you give me a
littel more step by step help please?
Click Account Sorting Office/Filters
Account Drop Down Box: click on Common Filters
Click on the funnel top left
Right hand side: Name change 'new filter' to 'K9 Junk' or something
spam with the marker
provided by K9.
Thank you.
Granville
Running The Bat! version 1.62r. on Windows 2000.
--
Love and Light,
Granvillemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information
recently and found it getting things totally wrong -
it ended up 'refusing' to classify anything in one email account.
After taking advice from this list a while back - I am now using K9 with
absolutely wonderfully, accurate, consistent, and so easily configurable
results.
--
Marten Gallagher
Annery
On Thu 13-Jul-06 2:33pm -0600, Marten Gallagher wrote:
I tried BayesIT again recently and found it getting things totally wrong -
it ended up 'refusing' to classify anything in one email account.
After taking advice from this list a while back - I am now using K9 with
absolutely wonderfully
...I am now using K9
Thanks for the advice. Does it work with X-Ray?
Dunno - but here's the site...
http://keir.net/k9_faq.html
I don;t use X-Ray any more - got my own SMTP server arrangement so don't
need to switch servers when around and about.
and I guess you know the X-Ray support page
Hello Robin,
Thursday, February 2, 2006, 11:54:19 PM, you wrote:
I thought the wireless hot spots (i.e. the ones around the city in Sydney
and Melbourne, occasionally free in coffee shops, otherwise pay by credit
card) only allowed http connections.
I could be wrong, I only looked at it
Hallo John,
On Thu, 2 Feb 2006 18:05:13 +1100GMT (2-2-2006, 8:05 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
JP Unable to get mail using wireless hot spots with Bat K9, although I can
JP send mail.
First thing that comes to mind is that it's a K9 issue. After all it
doesn't matter to TB as it's always
On Thu, 2 Feb 2006 13:34:13 +0100
Roelof Otten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hallo John,
On Thu, 2 Feb 2006 18:05:13 +1100GMT (2-2-2006, 8:05
+0100, where I
live), you wrote:
JP Unable to get mail using wireless hot spots with Bat
K9, although I can
JP send mail.
First thing that comes to mind
Hello John Phillips everyone else,
on 02-Feb-2006 at 08:05 you (John Phillips) wrote:
POP Server 127.0.0.1
By default, K9 listens on port , and not 110 (pop3 default). That may
be the culprit. I forget it each time I install K9 for someone. :-)
--
Best regards,
Alexander (http
Hi Alexander,
On Thu, 2 Feb 2006, at 19:29:59 [GMT+0100] (which was Fri, 5:29:59
Australian Eastern Time) you wrote:
y default, K9 listens on port , and not 110 (pop3 default).
Thanks, that is set up correctly.
On ADSL in Holiday Inn right now; all working fine.
Any other clues
Hi Roelof,
On Thu, 2 Feb 2006, at 13:34:13 [GMT+0100] (which was 23:34:13 Australian
Eastern Time) you wrote:
First thing that comes to mind is that it's a K9 issue. After all it
doesn't matter to TB as it's always downloading from localhost.
Thinking about it, it may be the wireless provider
On Thu, 2 Feb 2006 at 18:05:13 +1100, John wrote:
Unable to get mail using wireless hot spots with Bat K9, although I can
send mail.
I thought the wireless hot spots (i.e. the ones around the city in Sydney
and Melbourne, occasionally free in coffee shops, otherwise pay by credit
card) only
Hi Bat! Fans,
Unable to get mail using wireless hot spots with Bat K9, although I can
send mail.
No problems with dial up or broadband.
My settings are:-
POP Server 127.0.0.1
log in mail.bigpond.com/110/jp88
password x
Am I missing some reason why I cannot download with wireless?
I
Hello Bob,
Sunday, November 6, 2005, 2:45:39 AM, you wrote:
BM G'day Jack,
BM Sunday, November 6, 2005, 5:49:37 AM, you wrote:
Hello Bob,
Saturday, November 5, 2005, 12:22:30 AM, you wrote:
Well, I set K9's limit to 10,000KB (which should be 10megs) and ticked
the box. I then sent
G'day Jack,
Sunday, November 6, 2005, 5:49:37 AM, you wrote:
Hello Bob,
Saturday, November 5, 2005, 12:22:30 AM, you wrote:
Well, I set K9's limit to 10,000KB (which should be 10megs) and ticked
the box. I then sent myself the same 6meg message I've been playing
with from my wife's side
Hello Bob,
Saturday, November 5, 2005, 12:22:30 AM, you wrote:
BM Yes that is definitely the problem - well I'm almost sure :-) . Check
BM the box and insert a limit over which K9 isn't to check messages and
BM you hopefully won't see it fouling up on the large messages any more.
Well, I set K9
Hello Jack S. LaRosa everyone else,
on 05-Nov-2005 at 20:49 you (Jack S. LaRosa) wrote:
Well, I set K9's limit to 10,000KB (which should be 10megs) and ticked
the box. I then sent myself the same 6meg message
Keep in mind that encoding a binary file (I assume it is a binary file
Hello Alexander,
Saturday, November 5, 2005, 2:01:30 PM, you wrote:
ASK Hello Jack S. LaRosa everyone else,
ASK on 05-Nov-2005 at 20:49 you (Jack S. LaRosa) wrote:
Well, I set K9's limit to 10,000KB (which should be 10megs) and ticked
the box. I then sent myself the same 6meg message
ASK
Hello Jack S. LaRosa everyone else,
on 05-Nov-2005 at 23:34 you (Jack S. LaRosa) wrote:
ASK Keep in mind that encoding a binary file (I assume it is a binary
ASK file) for transport in a plaintext email messages increases the size
ASK of the binary file by about 30%.
Forgive my ignorance
Hello Bob,
Thursday, November 3, 2005, 11:31:51 PM, you wrote:
BM G'day Jack,
BM Friday, November 4, 2005, 1:42:39 PM, you wrote:
BM snipped
I looked all over K9 but could not find any setting which restricted
receipt of large emails. Did I miss something or have any others of
you had
On 04/11/05, Jack S. LaRosa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Upon receipt of your message I looked at the 'Don't filter messages
larger than' box and it's not checked, so there should be no size
restriction. I too am using v1.28.
That's your problem. Check it.
Roman
--
G'day Jack,
Friday, November 4, 2005, 9:41:29 PM, you wrote:
Hello Bob,
Thursday, November 3, 2005, 11:31:51 PM, you wrote:
BM G'day Jack,
BM Friday, November 4, 2005, 1:42:39 PM, you wrote:
BM snipped
I looked all over K9 but could not find any setting which restricted
receipt of large
G'day Bob,
Saturday, November 5, 2005, 4:22:30 PM, you wrote:
Quoting a whole lot of untrimmed message.
Yes that is definitely the problem - well I'm almost sure :-) . Check
the box and insert a limit over which K9 isn't to check messages and
you hopefully won't see it fouling up
Greetings fellow shipmates (because we're all in this boat together),
I have just discovered (after much cursing of computers and IPS's and
maybe just a little cursing of TB) that the reason TB wouldn't fetch
large (in this case,6M) emails is because of K9. I knew the email
existed and could
G'day Jack,
Friday, November 4, 2005, 1:42:39 PM, you wrote:
snipped
I looked all over K9 but could not find any setting which restricted
receipt of large emails. Did I miss something or have any others of
you had similar problems?
Under the configuration tab there is a box Don't filter
Hi Bat! Fans,
Apologies if off topic.
Using K9 on my laptop at home, and the IBM box at work, to filter spam from
Bat!
Starts immediately on the IBM box; on the laptop takes at lease one minute
(icon varies between K9 ! in yellow triangle.
Takes 100% of resources. I have trimmed the storage
Hello John Phillips everyone else,
on 24-Jul-2005 at 11:11 you (John Phillips) wrote:
Starts immediately on the IBM box
IBM's the good guys. :-D
on the laptop takes at lease one minute
(icon varies between K9 ! in yellow triangle.
The only idea I have is the virus scanner. Try to exclude
Hi Alexander,
On Sun, 24 Jul 2005, at 11:45:25 [GMT+0200] (which was 19:45:25 Australian
Eastern Time) you wrote:
The only idea I have is the virus scanner. Try to exclude K9's data
directory from on-access scanning, maybe that helps.
Thanks. Didn't help! :-(
--
John Phillips, Sydney
Hello John,
Sunday, July 24, 2005, 5:09:14 AM, you wrote:
Hi Alexander,
On Sun, 24 Jul 2005, at 11:45:25 [GMT+0200] (which was 19:45:25 Australian
Eastern Time) you wrote:
The only idea I have is the virus scanner. Try to exclude K9's data
directory from on-access scanning, maybe
Hi Michael,
On Sun, 24 Jul 2005, at 09:11:12 [GMT-0500] (which was Mon, 0:11:12
Australian Eastern Time) you wrote:
Do you have a Firewall running, John? I know when I have the Zone
Alarm Suite running K-9 is a lot slower than when ZA is not running.
If you don't have a Firewall, then I am
Hello Group
I've given up on the spam add-ons for TB!, neither of them seem to
work very well.
I've installed K9 and set it up for two of my eight email accounts. I
am filtering on Subject contains [Spam] because I couldn't find out
how to filter on the 'X-Text-Classification
Hallo Jeff,
On Wed, 29 Jun 2005 16:03:14 +0100GMT (29-6-2005, 17:03 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
JG I've installed K9 and set it up for two of my eight email accounts. I
JG am filtering on Subject contains [Spam] because I couldn't find out
JG how to filter on the 'X-Text-Classification
Hello Group
On Wednesday, June 29, 2005, 5:08:49 PM, Roelof wrote:
Now you can filter in the sorting office on:
Header field - Text-Classification - contains - whatever
Thank you, Roelof, now carefully filed away in my help folder :-)
It's been awhile since I played with K9, but IIRC
Hello Jeff Gaines everyone else,
on 29-Jun-2005 at 17:03 you (Jeff Gaines) wrote:
I've installed K9 and set it up for two of my eight email accounts. I am
filtering on Subject contains [Spam] because I couldn't find out how to
filter on the 'X-Text-Classification' - is this, or something
Hello Jeff,
Wednesday, June 29, 2005, 11:30:00 AM, you wrote:
OK, I took the plunge and this does seem to work, it's astonishing
when you follow the route of an email on just one PC!
I must say the signs are good with K9. I guess now some parts of my
body will shrink, I'll have to live
Hello Group
Where have you been? :) The exact same question has been answered two days
ago.
Sorry, Alexander. I've been sweltering in the awful humidity in the UK
and watching all our players being knocked out of Wimbledon :-(
--
Jeff Gaines Damerham Hampshire UK
:Jeff_Gaines:
Hello Alexander,
Sunday, June 26, 2005, 11:25:48 AM, you wrote:
I've been using K9 spam filter successfully for some time. I've
filtered on the X-Text-Classification: spam header added to the
kludges by K9. But TB!'s Sorting Office no longer uses the term
kludges and I can't find a way
Hello Alexander,
Sunday, June 26, 2005, 12:25:48 PM, you wrote:
Hello Quin Selman everyone else,
on 26-Jun-2005 at 19:13 you (Quin Selman) wrote:
Hello TB! Users,
I've been using K9 spam filter successfully for some time. I've
filtered on the X-Text-Classification: spam header added
Hello TB! Users,
I've been using K9 spam filter successfully for some time. I've
filtered on the X-Text-Classification: spam header added to the
kludges by K9. But TB!'s Sorting Office no longer uses the term
kludges and I can't find a way to filter on X-Text-Classification:
spam. I'm hoping some
Hello Quin Selman everyone else,
on 26-Jun-2005 at 19:13 you (Quin Selman) wrote:
Hello TB! Users,
I've been using K9 spam filter successfully for some time. I've
filtered on the X-Text-Classification: spam header added to the
kludges by K9. But TB!'s Sorting Office no longer uses the term
Hi,
I would like to try K9 but I am already using GPGrelay and would like
to continue using that at the same time. Is that possible?
--
Henk M. de Bruijn
__
The Bat! Natural E-Mail System version 3.5 RC2 Pro on Windows XP SP2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Hi Henk,
On Thu, 5 May 2005 09:54:46 +0200 (3:54 AM here), Henk M. de Bruijn
[HMdB] wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
HMdB I would like to try K9 but I am already using GPGrelay and would
HMdB like to continue using that at the same time
Hello Mike,
On Wednesday, January 26, 2005, 17:14:59, Mike Rourke wrote:
Decided to try K9 with TB see wow it worked. I have K9 set up to add
X-text-classification SPAM to the header. I then set up a filter to
move mail with this header to the junk folder, no problem, so I
thought.
Makes
Hello Melissa Reese everyone else,
on 27-Jan-2005 at 04:13 you (Melissa Reese) wrote:
I have no idea if this should make any difference, but are you by
chance using the Junk mail folder that TB! creates for use with the
BayesIt plug-in?
I use that folder with K9 (no Bayes* plugin installed
K9 Users or anyone who can explain this...
Decided to try K9 with TB see wow it worked. I have K9 set up to add
X-text-classification SPAM to the header. I then set up a filter to
move mail with this header to the junk folder, no problem, so I
thought. TB is toggling parking to on for random
K9, I just created a fresh SPAM folder for K9
designated spam, and I've never seen any of the behavior you've
described.
Again, I don't know if my speculations about folders makes any sense
here.
--
Melissa
PGP public keys:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Body=Please%20send%20keys
TB! v2.12.00
Hi Melissa,
MR When I set up my K9, I just created a fresh SPAM folder for K9
MR designated spam, and I've never seen any of the behavior you've
MR described.
MR Again, I don't know if my speculations about folders makes any sense
MR here.
It makes sense. I have deleted the folder several
Hi Mike,
On Wednesday, January 26, 2005, at 8:59:54 PM PST, you wrote:
It makes sense. I have deleted the folder several times, recreated
it it with varying names to no avail...
I'm still using TB! v2.12, and I see that you're using v3. I don't
know if there's some peculiar about the
ASK Except for the nigeria connection scam mails of which I get at least two a
ASK day on three accounts ATM. K9 repeatedly misses those. *sigh*
RHS They usually get past k9 and BayesIt here also, but frankly I don't
RHS mind. Some of them are quite funny, and once in awhile I'll bite on
RHS one
Hello Mark,
On Monday, November 29, 2004, 9:39 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PJ The filter is as follows:
PJ TB! Message Filter
PJ beginFilter
PJ UID: [97E80840.01C492FE.7689AE34.682BBB08]
PJ Name: K9\20Anti-Spam
PJ Filter: {\0D\0A\20`7`X-Text-Classification`0`\20spam\0D\0A}
PJ
Hi Alexander,
On Tuesday, November 30, 2004, 10:09 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've set up K9 anti-spam and the TB filters to move spam to a junk
folder, but for some reason the filter isn't working. K9 allows you
to use the message header X-Text-Classification to identify spam
Hello P.Johnson everyone else,
on 30-Nov-2004 at 17:11 you (P.Johnson) wrote:
K9 learns and works very quickly
Except for the nigeria connection scam mails of which I get at least two a
day on three accounts ATM. K9 repeatedly misses those. *sigh*
so this is frustrating; don't know whether
Hi Alexander,
On Tuesday, November 30, 2004, 11:44 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
K9 learns and works very quickly
ASK Except for the nigeria connection scam mails of which I get at least two a
ASK day on three accounts ATM. K9 repeatedly misses those. *sigh*
I've received a couple lately
and it works perfectly. It is the last filter in a list of *account*
filters.
It has nothing to do with K9, but this common filter works, too:
TB! Message Filter
beginFilter
UID: [9E420870.01C4ADF9.5ED08BA5.73489440]
Name: junk
Filter: {\0D\0A\20`4`2`Get\20a\20capable\20html\20e-mailer\0D\0A
K9 learns and works very quickly
ASK Except for the nigeria connection scam mails of which I get at least two a
ASK day on three accounts ATM. K9 repeatedly misses those. *sigh*
They're troublesome for my filter, too. I figure it's because except
for spam words like Nigeria, Togo and Central
Hello Code 2 everyone else,
on 30-Nov-2004 at 19:06 you (Code 2) wrote:
ASK Except for the nigeria connection scam mails of which I get at least two a
ASK day on three accounts ATM. K9 repeatedly misses those. *sigh*
They're troublesome for my filter, too. I figure it's because except
Hello Thorvald Neumann everyone else,
on 30-Nov-2004 at 19:00 you (Thorvald Neumann) wrote:
Filter: {\0D\0A\20`5`0`X-Text-Classification:\20junk\0D\0A}
You altered the default header from spam to junk. Unless Pat did that,
it won't work for her. :-)
--
Best regards,
Alexander
ON Tuesday, November 30, 2004, 5:58:20 PM, you wrote:
ASK Except for the nigeria connection scam mails of which I get at least two a
ASK day on three accounts ATM. K9 repeatedly misses those. *sigh*
BayesFilter catches these for me nicely.
It is weak on other mails though :(
--
Best regards
Hæ!
Tuesday, November 30, 2004, 19:24, Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
You altered the default header from spam to junk. Unless Pat did that,
it won't work for her. :-)
Ah, yes. I thought my old PopFile-filters would work with K9 when I
just changed the header-addition. And guess what, the filters
ON Tuesday, November 30, 2004, 5:58:20 PM, you wrote:
ASK Except for the nigeria connection scam mails of which I get at least two a
ASK day on three accounts ATM. K9 repeatedly misses those. *sigh*
Hi Alexander,
I usually alert the company which email is being abused by sending a mail
Hello Gerard everyone else,
on 30-Nov-2004 at 19:44 you (Gerard) wrote:
ASK Except for the nigeria connection scam mails of which I get at least two a
ASK day on three accounts ATM. K9 repeatedly misses those. *sigh*
BayesFilter catches these for me nicely.
It is weak on other mails though
ON Tuesday, November 30, 2004, 8:35:09 PM, you wrote:
ASK now it seems to me it is better to let the
ASK whitelisted mails not go to the database since the english language 419
ASK mails get thru, maybe there'se too little difference...
That is how I have set it up.
--
Best regards,
Gerard
consistently. It seems strange
that some mail classified as spam would be moved to the correct folder,
and others also marked would not be moved by the filter.
I've configured K9 to *not* add the spam percentage count to the header so
that it'll simply contain spam.
IIRC the default setting
Hello Gerard,
On Tuesday, November 30, 2004 at 19:44:25 GMT +0100 (which was
19:44:25 where I live), Gerard wrote and made these valuable points on
the subject of K9 spam filter:
G ON Tuesday, November 30, 2004, 5:58:20 PM, you wrote:
ASK Except for the nigeria connection scam mails of which I
On Tuesday, November 30, 2004, 22:02:04, Dick H. wrote:
That's why I stopped using a Bayes based filter. The spammers are
getting very smart and know their ways to cheat these filters. I
installed a challenge/response based spam filter and not a single spam
mail got to my inbox since then
Hello Jernej,
On Tuesday, November 30, 2004 at 22:18:06 GMT +0100 (which was
22:18:06 where I live), Jernej Simoncic wrote and made these valuable
points on the subject of K9 spam filter:
JS On Tuesday, November 30, 2004, 22:02:04, Dick H. wrote:
That's why I stopped using a Bayes based filter
,
and others also marked would not be moved by the filter.
ASK I've configured K9 to *not* add the spam percentage count to the header so
ASK that it'll simply contain spam.
ASK IIRC the default setting is to include that counter so the header is
ASK spam[89] or something. Maybe thats the problem
Hello Thorvald,
On Tuesday, November 30, 2004, 4:51 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
TN My filter looks like this:
TN TB! Message Filter
TN beginFilter
TN UID: [564C1620.01C4B05E.1A441C3F.7FE14B3D]
TN Name: SPAM
TN Filter: {\0D\0A\20`5`0`X-Text-Classification:\20junk\0D\0A}
TN MoveMessage
Alexander,
Tuesday, November 30, 2004, 9:58:20 PM, you wrote:
ASK Except for the nigeria connection scam mails of which I get at least two a
ASK day on three accounts ATM. K9 repeatedly misses those. *sigh*
They usually get past k9 and BayesIt here also, but frankly I don't
mind. Some of them
Hello Richard,
Monday, November 29, 2004, 2:52:41 AM, you wrote:
I'm not worried about any problems with actually getting the virus. I
just would like TB! to quarantine it rather than delete them manually
when Avast catches them.
Then you probably have to exclude K9's temporary directory
On Sun, 28 Nov 2004 21:11:23 +0100, Raymund Thomas Tump wrote:
Well, it should. K9 has to analyse the mail and I suppose it will
store the mail for a time on the hard disk. That that is where Avast
can fetch it. But that would harm the mail delivery only if K9 sends
the mail from disk, which
Hello,
I've set up K9 anti-spam and the TB filters to move spam to a junk
folder, but for some reason the filter isn't working. K9 allows you to
use the message header X-Text-Classification to identify spam for the
purpose of filtering it.
The filter is as follows:
TB! Message Filter
Hello P.Johnson,
Tuesday, November 30, 2004, 4:55:58 AM, you wrote:
PJ The filter is as follows:
PJ TB! Message Filter
PJ beginFilter
PJ UID: [97E80840.01C492FE.7689AE34.682BBB08]
PJ Name: K9\20Anti-Spam
PJ Filter: {\0D\0A\20`7`X-Text-Classification`0`\20spam\0D\0A}
PJ MoveMessage
Hello P.Johnson,
Tuesday, November 30, 2004, 4:55:58 AM, you wrote:
I've set up K9 anti-spam and the TB filters to move spam to a junk
folder, but for some reason the filter isn't working. K9 allows you
to use the message header X-Text-Classification to identify spam for
the purpose
Hi Richard,
on Sat, 27 Nov 2004 15:40:22 +0500GMT, you wrote:
RHS I'm trying out K9 ... However, it causes a problem for my AV
RHS plugin (Avast), which heretofore would flag viruses and
RHS automatically move them to the quarantine folder.
I used K9 before I installed Avast, and thus never
On Sat, 27 Nov 2004 15:40:22 +0500, Richard H. Stoddard wrote:
Greetings:
I'm trying out K9 since BayesIt has dropped from an accuracy rate of
97% to less than 33% over the last few months. However, it causes a
problem for my AV plugin (Avast), which heretofore would flag viruses
and automatically
Hi Andre,
on Sun, 28 Nov 2004 15:45:00 +0100GMT, you wrote:
it was a lot cleaner when the plugin just moved them automatically
to the quarantine folder. Is there any way to configure either K9,
TB!, or Avast to restore that functionality?
AW That's strange. The plugin works on messages
On Sun, 28 Nov 2004 15:58:14 +0100, Peter Meyns wrote:
I cannot find a
setting anywhere to move all infected mails to quarantine (or delete)
automatically either.
I have only v2 here but this is not plugin specific. I can set the option
even without an installed plugin. See
Hi Andre,
on Sun, 28 Nov 2004 18:22:18 +0100GMT, you wrote:
AW On Sun, 28 Nov 2004 15:58:14 +0100, Peter Meyns wrote:
I cannot find a
setting anywhere to move all infected mails to quarantine (or delete)
automatically either.
AW I have only v2 here but this is not plugin specific. I can set
Hi Andre,
That's strange. The plugin works on messages as they come in from the
mailserver. Whether that mailserver is your actual mailserver or k9
shouldn't make a difference at all.
Well, it should. K9 has to analyse the mail and I suppose it will
store the mail for a time on the hard disk
Andre,
Sunday, November 28, 2004, 7:45:00 PM, you wrote:
AW That's strange. The plugin works on messages as they come in from the
AW mailserver. Whether that mailserver is your actual mailserver or k9
AW shouldn't make a difference at all. You mean the plugin catches it? And
AW what
Raymund,
Monday, November 29, 2004, 1:11:23 AM, you wrote:
RTT Well, it should. K9 has to analyse the mail and I suppose it will
RTT store the mail for a time on the hard disk. That that is where Avast
RTT can fetch it. But that would harm the mail delivery only if K9 sends
RTT the mail from
Andre,
Sunday, November 28, 2004, 7:45:00 PM, you wrote:
AW That's strange. The plugin works on messages as they come in from the
AW mailserver. Whether that mailserver is your actual mailserver or k9
AW shouldn't make a difference at all. You mean the plugin catches it? And
AW what
1 - 100 of 178 matches
Mail list logo
