Hi
On Friday 11 December 2009 at 9:07:46 PM, in
, MFPA wrote:
> Hi
> On Tuesday 25 August 2009 at 6:50:01 PM, in
> , I wrote:
>> Now reported at
>> https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=7699
> Since I was not the only person to observe this issue,
> I'm surprised to find nobody else has add
Hi
On Tuesday 25 August 2009 at 6:50:01 PM, in
, I wrote:
> Now reported at
> https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=7699
Since I was not the only person to observe this issue, I'm surprised
to find nobody else has added any notes of confirmation to my bug
report. Can anybody confirm wheth
Hi
On Tuesday 25 August 2009 at 4:25:25 PM, in
, I wrote:
> Further investigation reveals an issue that affects a
> number of other macros in addition to %SingleRe.
Now reported at https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=7699
--
Best regards
MFPA
Ultimate cons
Hi
On Tuesday 25 August 2009 at 6:52:21 PM, in
,
tracer wrote:
> Thats probably the best solution...
Except that the same problem afflicts several other macros.
--
Best regards
MFPA
Life is a holiday. In the same way that glass is a liquid
Using The Bat! v4.0
Hello Jim,
Tuesday, August 25, 2009, at 8:27:42 PM, Jim Kyle wrote:
.
JK> So the position of the "%SingleRe%-" line within the template IS critical
JK> to its operation. How do we go about reporting this as a replicable bug?
JK> More to the point, is it worthwhile doing so, since use of Single
Hi
On Tuesday 25 August 2009 at 2:27:42 PM, in
,
Jim Kyle wrote:
> So the position of the "%SingleRe%-" line within the
> template IS critical to its operation.
Further investigation reveals an issue that affects a number of other
macros in addition to %SingleRe.
If one of the affected mac
Test for On---
On Sunday, August 23, 2009, at 12:17:12 PM, MFPA wrote:
> Placing the line %SingleRe%-" before instead of after the "%SetHeader"
> lines fixed the issue in my PGPNET reply template. The %SingleRe is no
> longer ignored and the "Hi" is no longer swallowed.
> Moving the %SingleRe%-"
Hi
On Sunday 23 August 2009 at 5:22:42 PM, in
, MFPA wrote:
> I shall compare my reply templates for PGPNET and TBUDL.
My TBUDL template that was/is working begins with:-
%replyto="%fromname <%fromaddr>"%-
%-
%SingleRe%-
%SetHeader("X-Face","%QInclude='X-Face'")%-
%SetHe
Hi
On Thursday 20 August 2009 at 9:35:48 PM, in
, Jim Kyle wrote:
> Charles found an interesting anomaly that I'm now
> exploring, implying that the "%-" macro might be
> involved since the "On " of the first line was getting
> suppressed. I've got to plan out a series of
> experiments to pin it
On Thursday, August 20, 2009, at 12:57:25 PM, MFPA wrote:
> The easy answer to that is for the "new" account to never check for
> incoming mail. I have some accounts set up like that, with no "receive
> mail" settings at all. Also make sure that "mailbox checking" has both
> boxes unticked and
Hi
On Wednesday 19 August 2009 at 3:15:42 PM, in
, Jim Kyle wrote:
> Yes, I am. Could that be the problem? I'll try changing
> the sequence just in case it makes a difference. It
> might well be, since the %Account= macro might take
> effect AFTER the %SingleRe one and thus override it
> because
Hi
On Wednesday 19 August 2009 at 5:55:07 PM, in
, Jim Kyle wrote:
> Wednesday, August 19, 2009, at 11:40:00 AM, Jim Kyle
> wrote:
>> This is a test from the brand new account created for
>> use only with this list. Apparently this is going to
>> work, if this message makes it into the ser
Hello Jim,
Wednesday, August 19, 2009, at 7:32:15 PM, Jim Kyle wrote:
JK> See my reply to Roelof for details of the current test. The bottom group of
JK> lines in the template I posted earlier produce the version numbers,
JK> but I'm using the paid version of the sniper and the free version may
Test for On---
On Wednesday, August 19, 2009, at 12:16:04 PM, Charles Canato wrote:
> I'd have to TBUDL archives right now to be sure, but I could swear I saw
> your template like "On ", but on the first line of your replies, it's
> started right with just the week day name.
> Check that...
> From: j...@jimkyle.com
> Subject: Re: The Bat and Mac computing
>
> For now, I'll just go back to my original setup. Thanks for all the
> comments; I've learned a lot about some of the features.
Jim, I know you put a stone over the subject, but just out of curiosi
Wednesday, August 19, 2009, at 11:40:00 AM, Jim Kyle wrote:
> This is a test from the brand new account created for use only with this
> list. Apparently this is going to work, if this message makes it into the
> servers...
It's not feasible; since both this new account and the older "web" ac
Wednesday, August 19, 2009, at 8:10:05 AM, Roelof Otten wrote:
> I haven't got any address book templates that use the %Account= macro
> Why are you using it, do you filter your tbudl messages to a common
> filter?
This is a test from the brand new account created for use only with this
lis
Wednesday, August 19, 2009, at 8:10:05 AM, Roelof Otten wrote:
> I haven't got any address book templates that use the %Account= macro
> Why are you using it, do you filter your tbudl messages to a common
> filter?
I've moved the list's folder over to be under the "web" account, and the
filte
Wednesday, August 19, 2009, at 8:10:05 AM, Roelof Otten wrote:
> I haven't got any address book templates that use the %Account= macro
> Why are you using it, do you filter your tbudl messages to a common
> filter?
Yes, I am. Could that be the problem? I'll try changing the sequence just
in c
Hallo Jim,
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009 07:26:26 -0500GMT (19-8-2009, 14:26 +0200, where
I live), you wrote:
JK> Next I restored the tick mark for numbering on the account, after
JK> modifying the reply template in the AB to indicate that it's
JK> indeed the AB template (as you can see in the signature) -
Tuesday, August 18, 2009, at 10:15:27 PM, tracer wrote:
> For this msg I am partly using that macro you posted.
> I don't see any number in the subject and also in my tail of the msg
> for
> Antispamsniper which is installed (free one) the version isn't mentioned.
> When you edit the
Wednesday, August 19, 2009, at 1:37:03 AM, Roelof Otten wrote:
> The most common reason for AB templates that aren't used is that
> you've got multiple address book entries for the same address.
So I searched the AB for "tbudl" and got two entries. I then deleted one of
them and searched a
Hallo Jim,
On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 19:43:52 -0500GMT (19-8-2009, 2:43 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
JK> Here's the template, just copied (of course the signature break is part of
JK> the template). Still the numbers are getting added, even though I shut down
JK> TB! and restarted it just in case t
Hello Jim,
Wednesday, August 19, 2009, at 8:23:18 AM, Jim Kyle wrote:
JK> Tuesday, August 18, 2009, at 4:18:42 PM, MFPA wrote:
>> I suggest re-evaluating whether your new template is working as
>> expected; my messages do not contain the "[2]" in their subject line.
JK> No matter what I tried
Tuesday, August 18, 2009, at 4:18:42 PM, MFPA wrote:
> I suggest re-evaluating whether your new template is working as
> expected; my messages do not contain the "[2]" in their subject line.
No matter what I tried (putting in an address book template for the list,
setting a folder template per m
Tuesday, August 18, 2009, at 4:18:42 PM, MFPA wrote:
> I suggest re-evaluating whether your new template is working as
> expected; my messages do not contain the "[2]" in their subject line.
Here's the template, just copied (of course the signature break is part of
the template). Still the numbe
Hi
On Tuesday 18 August 2009 at 7:50:10 PM, in
, Jim Kyle wrote:
> Yes, I do get such messages, and drag them to the
> proper spot for re-threading in the message list.
I get a few, too. (-;
> As for what is happening with the header in this
> message, my best guess is that the whole subject
Tuesday, August 18, 2009, at 1:05:18 PM, MFPA wrote:
> How difficult can it be for an email client to send the message-id of
> the email it replies to in a "follow-up" header? And does that mean
> you get messages with subjects starting, "Re: Re[2]:" (-;
Not difficult at all, but it's all up to
Hi
On Tuesday 18 August 2009 at 6:33:11 PM, in
, Jim Kyle wrote:
> I keep the numbers in most of my messages, because so many of my
> correspondents use Outlook and other programs that do not provide
> proper threading data and the numbers help me manually restore
> threading in my archives...
Tuesday, August 18, 2009, at 11:34:42 AM, MFPA wrote:
> You could avoid those untidy little numbers in your subject lines by
> including in your reply template for TBUDL the following line:-
Thanks for reminding me! I keep the numbers in most of my messages, because
so many of my correspondents
Hallo MFPA,
On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 17:34:42 +0100GMT (18-8-2009, 18:34 +0200, where
I live), you wrote:
M> You could avoid those untidy little numbers in your subject lines by
M> including in your reply template for TBUDL the following line:-
M> %SingleRe%-
Or by unchecking the matching option
Hi
On Tuesday 18 August 2009 at 4:11:06 PM, in
, Jim Kyle wrote:
> Re[2]: The Bat and Mac computing
You could avoid those untidy little numbers in your subject lines by
including in your reply template for TBUDL the following line:-
%SingleRe%-
--
Best regards,
M
On Tuesday, August 18, 2009, at 10:01:10 AM, Jens Franik wrote:
> And who gives the Virtual Machine access to the Graphic Card and
> Screen? If there is an X System running, this needs to be started with
> an Account - even if it is unprivileged.
I didn't mention that the host system uses GDM, th
On 18 August 2009, 15:37, Jim Kyle wrote:
> The difference you cite between server and workstation implementation may
> explain why I have no problem with VMWare Server; I've not attempted to use
> VMWare's Workstation package. Virtualbox may well be simply a workstation
> implementation. That dif
Guten Tag Jim Kyle,
am Dienstag, 18. August 2009 um 16:37 schrieben Sie:
> The host system is running with no users logged in; it's sitting at the
> login screen. The VM, of course, is running with my single user logged in,
> and TB! running as is normal.
And who gives the Virtual Machine access
On Tuesday, August 18, 2009, at 9:27:15 AM, Jens Franik wrote:
> And with which System do you access to the Virtual Machine?
> There is no Operating System running and no User logged in?
The host system is running with no users logged in; it's sitting at the
login screen. The VM, of course, is ru
Guten Tag Jim Kyle,
am Dienstag, 18. August 2009 um 16:14 schrieben Sie:
> I've not had that problem with VMWare Server at either version 1.5 or 2; it
> runs round the clock here with no users logged into the host system.
And with which System do you access to the Virtual Machine?
There is no Op
On Tuesday, August 18, 2009, at 3:07:30 AM, Geoff Lane wrote:
> However, I do have one issue with VirtualBox, which is that I have to
> keep the user account on the host machine logged in.
I've not had that problem with VMWare Server at either version 1.5 or 2; it
runs round the clock here with n
On 17 August 2009, 21:51, Jens Franik wrote:
> I wouldn't do this, check out http://www.virtualbox.org which is
> smaller, easier, faster and more stable (my opinion). The exported
> Machines can be run on other Platforms too. It's availiable for Win,
> Linux, Unix, Mac.
~~~
FWIW I've switched fr
Guten Tag Charlene Ferrara,
am Montag, 17. August 2009 um 23:02 schrieben Sie:
> The best way to run Windows -it's true- is on a Mac. Never had a
> bluescreen or was affected by the regular problems, btw.
Try it with Linux Debian Lenny 5.0 :-)
Since i switched from a Real Windows to a VirtualBox
Jens Franik Sent on Monday, August 17, 2009 3:52 PM
>> so I would get something like VMware's Fusion that would allow me to
>> do this.
>I wouldn't do this, check out http://www.virtualbox.org which is
>smaller, easier, faster and more stable (my opinion).
Hi, Jens,
Thanks. I will definitely
Hi Jens Franik,
Monday, August 17, 2009
you let us know -possibly edited- :
>> so I would get something like VMware's Fusion that would allow me to
>> do this.
I am quite happy with parallels desktop. The only reason to "install"
Windows as a virtual machine is "the bat!" I still feel at home the
Guten Tag Achdut18,
am Montag, 17. August 2009 um 07:34 schrieben Sie:
> so I would get something like VMware's Fusion that would allow me to
> do this.
I wouldn't do this, check out http://www.virtualbox.org which is
smaller, easier, faster and more stable (my opinion). The exported
Machines ca
On Monday, August 17, 2009, at 1:50:23 AM, Achdut18 wrote:
> Mail can be downloaded and sent from either machine, and viewed
> simultaneously; however the mail actually "resides" on the desktop, with
> the laptop's registry files merely indicating that the actual mail files
> are residing on the
I think this could work--- I haven't seen any limitations yet, however you
may want to post your question to the VMWare forum:
http://communities.vmware.com/community/vmtn/desktop/fusion or someone else
here may chime in who may have some extra input as well. I hope all works
out well for you.
R
Hello Regina,
Monday, August 17, 2009, 12:53:28 AM, you wrote:
RK> Yes, I switched over to a Mac about a month ago with VMWare Fusion.
RK> Everything works great with thebat! and all your other windows-based
RK> programs.
This sounds very encouraging. There is an additional component that I
n
Yes, I switched over to a Mac about a month ago with VMWare Fusion.
Everything works great with thebat! and all your other windows-based
programs. The only difference is that you are using Mac and Windows
together, instead of only windows; to get into thebat! email, you simply
click on the VMWare
I am contemplating switching from a Windows machine to a Mac.
However, I will need to run some windows-based software, so I would
get something like VMware's Fusion that would allow me to do this.
Has anyone used The Bat on a Mac, either directly, or using windows
emulation software, such Fusion?
48 matches
Mail list logo
