> On 5. May 2018, at 11:12 PM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>
> A better answer would have been "Really sorry Theo and everyone, but I
> always come off as a dick..."
A double-standard is never a good idea. ;)
Cheers,
Franco
Hi Stuart et al.,
Sorry for the delay. Meanwhile, I've been reproducing the
issue on 6.3 by adding device rd and increasing MINIROOTSIZE
to grow the non-gdb amd64 kernel beyond 16 MB. The kernel
simply fails to boot.
> If the kernel should grow to a point where we run past some limit, we'll
> On 13. Mar 2018, at 4:04 PM, Ted Unangst <t...@tedunangst.com> wrote:
>
> Franco Fichtner wrote:
>> What can we do to help?
>
> Write smaller code...
Fair enough. ;)
On a more serious note, I'm referring to:
https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech=112152576800634=2
Hi,
With regard to a commit[1] by Theo in 2013, several questions
in the years before and a partial lift of the limitation on
i386 a while back (2015?) I'd like to ask what the future plans
are for OpenBSD.
Peeking at NetBSD, where the amd64 was bootstrapped, they are at
48 MB kernel size at the
Hi,
Thanks for making this happen!
> On 28. Feb 2018, at 11:09 PM, T.J. Townsend wrote:
>
> Errata patches for a speculative execution flaw in Intel CPUs have been
> released for OpenBSD 6.2 and 6.1.
[...]
> Binary updates for the amd64 platform are available via the
> On 2. Jul 2017, at 8:59 PM, Ted Unangst wrote:
>
> If the username starts with a digit, but isn't a number, treat it like root.
I question the simplicity of this patch due to the fact that it leaves
no head room for further security-related regressions. Maybe more
Hi,
Apologies for not posting this inline for fear of mail
client whitespace mangling.
https://github.com/fichtner/openbsd/commit/05ab4bd.patch
ok?
Cheers,
Franco
> On 11. Apr 2017, at 4:09 PM, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
>
> Index: sysexits.3
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/share/man/man3/sysexits.3,v
> retrieving revision 1.12
> diff -u -r1.12 sysexits.3
> --- sysexits.330
> On 24 Mar 2017, at 3:51 AM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>
> it is great that someone found a way to convert between licenses.
>
> AGPL -> GPL -> ISC -> PD
pfSense went through with this, being a 2-Clause BSD fork of m0n0wall,
going through a 6-Clause ESF and CLA (all your
> On 10 Mar 2017, at 4:43 PM, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 04:26:24PM +0100, Hiltjo Posthuma wrote:
>
>> I think a small typo slipped in the 6.1 notes. Patch below:
>
> Nope, the actual new functions is called recallocarray...
Yup, and still a typo in one
Hi Ted,
Thanks, this is very helpful. Don't mind exploring other
routes as long as they are sustainable within OpenBSD, e.g.
if kernel changes are needed that they are provided by the
standard kernel eventually.
> On 3 Jan 2017, at 9:44 PM, Ted Unangst wrote:
>
> Timo
Hi,
Switching from net-snmp to OpenBSD's snmpd raised two
issues and I'd like to know if they make sense to address:
A pid file is missing. Would a patch for this be accepted?
The snmpd.conf can contain static values. If these values
are rewritten/changed over time by rewriting the config,
Hi,
Is anyone aware or interested in porting vndcompress et al
from NetBSD to OpenBSD?
Is there any technical reason against inclusion?
We have a budget for this. If anyone is interested please
let me know.
Cheers,
Franco
> On 22 Jul 2016, at 7:58 PM, Mike Larkin wrote:
>
> What is your Hyper-V server host environment? Server 2012 R2? And I
> need a full dmesg from when this worked, please.
It's a Windows Server 2012 Datacenter Hyper-V failover cluster, controlled
by System Center 2012
Hi,
With a client we're running into the following boot panic
since upgrading from 5.7 to 5.9 on a specific Hyper-V guest:
cpu0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5420 @ 2.50GHz ("GenuineIntel" 686-class) 1.65 GHz
cpu0: FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CF
On 08 May 2014, at 18:43, Alexandre Ratchov a...@caoua.org wrote:
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 12:35:56PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
This is wrong in several ways.
Never cast sizeof down, always cast the comparison variable up.
I'll specifically call out this change:
-if (snprintf(buf,
On 22 Apr 2014, at 18:32, Henning Brauer lists-openbsdt...@bsws.de wrote:
the binary has been trojan horsed.
Not sure if urban dictionary should be a terminology pool for manual
pages.
Also, there's clearly a hyphen missing: ``trojan-horsed''. No capital
T obviously since the term is common
On 20 Nov 2013, at 21:40, Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org wrote:
FreeBSD and Dragonfly BSD have this option in tr. So, this actually
improves portability.
It's just spreading the disease. portable means it works everywhere.
Increasing the number of people who can write nonportable
Hi Maxime,
On Jul 8, 2013, at 10:40 AM, Maxime Villard rusty...@gmx.fr wrote:
the static variables are not initialized?
Static variables are always zeroed when not specified otherwise.
Regards,
Franco
On Jul 4, 2013, at 6:43 PM, Stefan Fritsch s...@sfritsch.de wrote:
fix: %x instead of %p for int
---
sys/dev/pci/musycc_obsd.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git sys/dev/pci/musycc_obsd.c sys/dev/pci/musycc_obsd.c
index 25a58d8..0844136 100644
---
Hi all,
adhering to the basic rule of not reinventing the wheel has sort of
crippled the efforts to come up with an elegant solution for the
topic at hand. Two approaches have been proposed earlier, so let's
go through them:
(1) Diverting traffic to userspace
That's generally a good idea, but
You are right, my mistake. The previous patch was the consistency
patch, but this one actually does what the subject says. The motivation
behind it was the fact that rb trees *almost* support this and I can't
see any harm. The same could be done for splay trees, but I found this
too intrusive
Hi,
found this while reading up on recent changes to -current.
Genuine cvs diff this time. ;)
Regards,
Franco
Index: octeonreg.h
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/arch/octeon/include/octeonreg.h,v
retrieving revision 1.1
diff -u -r1.1
Hi,
I've had this patch in my tree for a while. It's just a consistency
fix so that cmp can be a plain macro for rb-trees, too.
Regards,
Franco
Index: tree.h
===
RCS file: /OpenBSD/src/sys/sys/tree.h,v
retrieving revision 1.13
Hi Damien,
On May 2, 2013, at 10:03 AM, Damien Miller d...@mindrot.org wrote:
On Wed, 1 May 2013, Franco Fichtner wrote:
Not sure if that's a fitting comparison; and I know too little OSPF
to answer. Let me try another route. The logic consists of an array
of application detection
On May 2, 2013, at 10:45 AM, Damien Miller d...@mindrot.org wrote:
On Thu, 2 May 2013, Franco Fichtner wrote:
as stated before, breaking down complexity to the bare minimum is my
requirement for this to be happening at all. You all get to be the
judges. I'm just trying to work
On May 2, 2013, at 1:23 PM, Damien Miller d...@mindrot.org wrote:
On Thu, 2 May 2013, Franco Fichtner wrote:
Well, bare minimum complexity per-protocol * large_number_of_protocols =
a lot of complexity. The incentive is always going to be to add more
protocols and never retire them.
I
On May 2, 2013, at 2:40 PM, Damien Miller d...@mindrot.org wrote:
On Thu, 2 May 2013, Franco Fichtner wrote:
Moving implementations to user space does not necessarily make them
better or less of a problem.
The big difference is that its possible to sandbox a userspace
implementation so
On May 2, 2013, at 3:20 PM, Damien Miller d...@mindrot.org wrote:
On Thu, 2 May 2013, Franco Fichtner wrote:
OK, the implementation only pulls a couple of bytes from the packet's
payload. It will never pull bytes that are not verified. It will never
allocate anything. It will never test
Hi Stuart,
On May 1, 2013, at 1:11 AM, Stuart Henderson st...@openbsd.org wrote:
On 2013/05/01 00:16, Franco Fichtner wrote:
Yes, I am proposing a lightweight approach: hard-wired regex-like
code, no allocations, no reassembly or state machines. I've seen
far worse things being put
Hi Ted,
On May 1, 2013, at 1:14 AM, Ted Unangst t...@tedunangst.com wrote:
On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 00:16, Franco Fichtner wrote:
Yes, I am proposing a lightweight approach: hard-wired regex-like
code, no allocations, no reassembly or state machines. I've seen
far worse things being put
On May 1, 2013, at 9:41 AM, Stuart Henderson st...@openbsd.org wrote:
I should have expanded the acronum to make it clear - osfp i.e. the
OS fingerprinting code (pf_osfp.c).
oh, sorry, my mistake. This I can comment on. :)
The idea is the same. I'd say at this stage osfp has more complexity
Hi misc@,
so I have been working on a BSD licensed DPI engine. It's a
very lightweight, non-intrusive approach and I know that teasers
are boring, but I'd like to know if it's worth the time to
work on inclusion for pf(4). So far I have about 25 supported
applications and the necessary hooks
On Apr 27, 2013, at 7:36 PM, Ted Unangst t...@tedunangst.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 08:10, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 01:08:06AM -0400, Eitan Adler wrote:
Adding static to internal function allows the compiler to better
detect dead code (functions, variables, etc)
On Apr 27, 2013, at 9:28 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger jo...@britannica.bec.de wrote:
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 09:09:25PM +0200, Franco Fichtner wrote:
On backtrace(3) (which is a GNU thing, I know), static functions don't
show up with their respective names even though they are in the binary.
That's
On 28.03.2013, at 13:17, Daniel Bolgheroni dan...@bolgh.eng.br wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 05:46:30AM +, Miod Vallat wrote:
You can't say in substance it's a pity OpenBSD doesn't support the VAX
11/780 anymore in one mail, you guys really ought to ditch floppy
installation media in
On Mar 26, 2013, at 6:26 PM, Creamy cre...@nocrater.com wrote:
but I honestly question the utility of any of these ISA
network and SCSI drivers.
Perhaps somebody who is new to coding might be able to learn something
from them?
There is such a vast amount of code in the different BSD
On Mar 26, 2013, at 10:06 PM, Creamy cre...@nocrater.com wrote:
Looking to the future, when are we going to drop 486 support, anyway?
Now, that's a more interesting thing ask.
How much of the hardware survives now, anyway? I mean at least the old
Vaxen were, (and are), maintainable. 486
On Mar 26, 2013, at 11:11 PM, Creamy cre...@nocrater.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 10:50:40PM +0400, Franco Fichtner wrote:
Nobody in their right mind would have such a system as
mission critical infrastructure. :)
What, like using a Honeywell 316 as a nuclear power station
reactor
Hi all,
found this still lingering in my tree. Still trying to figure out
the best workflow for sending patches. Not sure if this adheres
to the standards.
Thanks,
Franco
---
share/man/man3/tree.3 | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/share/man/man3/tree.3
On Feb 17, 2013, at 6:45 PM, Otto Moerbeek o...@drijf.net wrote:
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 03:59:41PM +0100, Franco Fichtner wrote:
Hi all,
found this still lingering in my tree. Still trying to figure out
the best workflow for sending patches. Not sure if this adheres
to the standards
On Nov 26, 2012, at 9:44 PM, Christian Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de wrote:
Todd T. Fries t...@fries.net wrote:
If there are desires to improve this (I hear Naddy grumbling!) then the
stomach to break backwards compat must be present, or suggestions on how
to do it without breaking
On Nov 15, 2012, at 5:53 PM, Reyk Floeter r...@openbsd.org wrote:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Marc Espie es...@nerim.net wrote:
external people regularly ask but why you don't want to use GNU/m4 GNU/make
GNU/whatever ?
External people seem to ask weird questions.
I just had to
Just being paranoid... strncmp? And how about consolidating style while at it?
! vs. == 0 - see code bits below change.
Franco
On 22.04.2012, at 15:12, Christiano F. Haesbaert haesba...@openbsd.org
wrote:
There's no need for doing that somewhat strange comparison, the rest
of the code already
On Apr 22, 2012, at 7:58 PM, Christiano F. Haesbaert wrote:
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 06:36:41PM +0200, Franco Fichtner wrote:
Just being paranoid... strncmp?
Why ? It's a terminated string vs a string literal, what do you wanna
use as the third argument: strlen(AuthenticAmd) ? . 100
On Apr 22, 2012, at 9:32 PM, Christiano F. Haesbaert wrote:
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 09:16:57PM +0200, Franco Fichtner wrote:
On Apr 22, 2012, at 7:58 PM, Christiano F. Haesbaert wrote:
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 06:36:41PM +0200, Franco Fichtner wrote:
Just being paranoid... strncmp?
Why
46 matches
Mail list logo