to
ipv6 then ipv4 if you have it enabled. Too soon I think. I'm hoping for
ipv6 get more traction soon, so we could end using nat on our pf rules.
--
Giancarlo Razzolini
GPG: 4096R/77B981BC
life as sysadmins much easier. IPv6 will happen. The
sooner the better. But this default on OpenBSD is not the way to make it
happen faster.
Cheers,
--
Giancarlo Razzolini
GPG: 4096R/77B981BC
at the core dump, see if I can
pinpoint where are the bits responsible for the segfault.
Cheers,
--
Giancarlo Razzolini
GPG: 4096R/77B981BC
Em 16-05-2014 16:45, Kenneth Westerback escreveu:
On 16 May 2014 15:00, Giancarlo Razzolini grazzol...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I was configuring one new interface in one of my new machines, and I
disabled ipv6 with -inet6 as I always do. But I handcrafted the
hostname.if file and forgot
Em 16-05-2014 17:18, Stuart Henderson escreveu:
On 2014/05/16 17:12, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
As I mentioned, I'm running 5.5 stable. So this might got fixed in
current, I'm taking a look at the CVS commits right now to see if it was
fixed. But, funny thing, I've managed to get another
Em 16-05-2014 17:18, Stuart Henderson escreveu:
On 2014/05/16 17:12, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
As I mentioned, I'm running 5.5 stable. So this might got fixed in
current, I'm taking a look at the CVS commits right now to see if it was
fixed. But, funny thing, I've managed to get another
Em 16-05-2014 18:15, Stuart Henderson escreveu:
On 2014/05/16 17:26, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
Em 16-05-2014 17:18, Stuart Henderson escreveu:
On 2014/05/16 17:12, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
As I mentioned, I'm running 5.5 stable. So this might got fixed in
current, I'm taking a look
segfaulted. All of them are amd64, I didn't
tried with an i386 installation.
Cheers,
--
Giancarlo Razzolini
GPG: 4096R/77B981BC
Em 16-05-2014 23:48, sven falempin escreveu:
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 10:15 PM, Giancarlo Razzolini
grazzol...@gmail.com mailto:grazzol...@gmail.com wrote:
Em 16-05-2014 18:19, Héctor Luis Gimbatti escreveu:
/etc/hostname.if
Inet 1.2.3.4 255.255.255.0 NONE -inet6
, which=1)
at /usr/src/sbin/ifconfig/ifconfig.c:4524
#4 0x00401968 in setifaddr (addr=0x7f7ea9ac -inet,
param=0) at /usr/src/sbin/ifconfig/ifconfig.c:1112
#5 0x00400afd in main (argc=1, argv=0x7f7ea890) at
/usr/src/sbin/ifconfig/ifconfig.c:738
Cheers,
--
Giancarlo
(obviously) given a heads up to prepare them over
the last few days.
OpenBSD / LibreSSL did not receive any heads-up from OpenSSL.
So hold on, we'll try to have errata out in a few hours.
Theo,
I'm just curious, but, this happened in the past?
Cheers,
--
Giancarlo Razzolini
GPG: 4096R
, to this degree as you
mentioned, just after you guys forked OpenSSL. I've disable most of the
daemons that use ssl in my systems, until this errata comes along. Don't
hush it, specially since you guys didn't got notified of this.
Cheers,
--
Giancarlo Razzolini
GPG: 4096R/77B981BC
, a hidden agenda, in that this stupid disclosure was
indeed, carefully planed. One can never have too many conspiracy
theories. Specially after what has been happening the last year. Thanks
for the clarification.
Cheers,
--
Giancarlo Razzolini
GPG: 4096R/77B981BC
,
--
Giancarlo Razzolini
GPG: 4096R/77B981BC
running under qemu/kvm? If so, you might had came
across the same issue I had:
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-techm=140026687510910w=2
It's nice to know that the latest snapshot solves this issue. I'll
give it a try.
Cheers,
--
Giancarlo Razzolini
GPG: 4096R/77B981BC
Em 07-06-2014 00:04, Solar Designer escreveu:
tools and ethics are separate things
It seems like you got to the real issue now.
Cheers,
--
Giancarlo Razzolini
GPG: 4096R/77B981BC
to a different state if one of the links is flapping
between states. I know this makes it not a pure machine state, but I
believe that the improvements can be worth the change. What you guys think?
Cheers,
--
Giancarlo Razzolini
GPG: 4096R/77B981BC
to discuss
with you guys here on tech@ first. Perhaps something entirely different
needs to be done.
Cheers,
--
Giancarlo Razzolini
GPG: 4096R/77B981BC
,
--
Giancarlo Razzolini
GPG: 4096R/77B981BC
. I've been living without it anyway.
Cheers,
--
Giancarlo Razzolini
GPG: 4096R/77B981BC
that cures humans from making mistakes.
I do not believe I can stop any government with loads of money from
compromising my machines. But at the very least I can try to put up a
hell of a fight for them. I do not like to be the low hanging fruit.
Cheers,
--
Giancarlo Razzolini
GPG: 4096R
problems. It would be one thing else to compromise. There
is no ultimately trust in real life, why there would be in the internet?
I wont die if they don't add it. Just will keep doing the same things
and hoping that I did not were compromised.
Cheers,
--
Giancarlo Razzolini
GPG: 4096R/77B981BC
.Nm rc.conf.local
-file.
+file and copy only the variables you wish to change from
+.Nm rc.conf
+and adjust them as you like.
Variables set in this file will override variables previously set in
.Nm rc.conf .
.Pp
--
Giancarlo Razzolini
GPG: 4096R/77B981BC
Em 10-02-2014 18:28, Mark Kettenis escreveu:
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 18:05:38 -0200
From: Giancarlo Razzolini grazzol...@gmail.com
As mentioned before on misc@, some user got confused and copied the
entire rc.conf file to rc.conf.local and then proceeded editing it. This
patch brings
the variables you wish to change from
+.Nm rc.conf
+and adjust them as you like.
Variables set in this file will override variables previously set in
.Nm rc.conf .
.Pp
--
Giancarlo Razzolini
GPG: 4096R/77B981BC
to modify, to accomplish the same. I know it would involve lots of
hacking with boot(8), with the kernel itself, and perhaps more. Also, I
want to know how hard you guys think it would be.
Cheers,
--
Giancarlo Razzolini
GPG: 4096R/77B981BC
Em 05-03-2014 17:30, Ted Unangst escreveu:
On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 16:15, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
Hi,
I have one linux server that has full disk encryption, and I use
it's initramfs with dropbear to be able to remote unlock the encrypted
root partition.
From what I read from
Em 05-03-2014 18:05, Stuart Henderson escreveu:
On 2014/03/05 17:48, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
Em 05-03-2014 17:30, Ted Unangst escreveu:
On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 16:15, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
Hi,
I have one linux server that has full disk encryption, and I use
it's initramfs
is one of them. I believe that there are others. Come on
guys, I'm not asking for implementation, just want some pointers and
ideas. I know it would be a very hard task, but I would like the challenge.
Cheers,
--
Giancarlo Razzolini
GPG: 4096R/77B981BC
believe, not have looked much at the code yet, that the kexec()
approach would be simpler than implementing the pivot_root().
Cheers,
--
Giancarlo Razzolini
GPG: 4096R/77B981BC
to that file called
locore.S ...
Yes, I was looking at this file a few moments before you e-mail arrived.
Seems some pretty scary asm stuff. Nevertheless, I'm still willing to
take a look at it. So everybody agrees that the kexec() approach is the
best one?
Cheers,
--
Giancarlo Razzolini
GPG
, a tun should forward broadcast, should it not ?
*go read qemu socket node*
If it is configured with the link0 option, yes.
--
Giancarlo Razzolini
GPG: 4096R/77B981BC
. Of course it all depends on which hypervisor you are
using. On qemu/kvm I generally go with vio and, if it do not work that
well, I go with em. YMMV.
Cheers,
--
Giancarlo Razzolini
GPG: 4096R/77B981BC
is that openbsd won't see more than one processor, no
matter what you do.
--
Giancarlo Razzolini
GPG: 4096R/77B981BC
. And even then I'm not sure I'll be able to solve
the problem.
--
Giancarlo Razzolini
GPG: 4096R/77B981BC
35 matches
Mail list logo
