Re: Trying to install the F24 version of VirtualBox-5.1-5.1.6 in F25

On 10/11/16 11:47, Ian Kent wrote: On Tue, 2016-10-11 at 11:23 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote: On 11.10.2016 11:15, Ian Kent wrote: On Tue, 2016-10-11 at 16:29 +0800, Ian Kent wrote: [...] I guess the other thing you could do is grab the libvpx-1.5.0 source rpm and give it a different name like

Re: Installation validation test change proposal: merge USB tests into 'default boot and install', add more environment columns

On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 10:00:05PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > > Based on feedback from Ambassadors, DVD images may still be useful > > giveaways in regions with less access to bandwidth. I'm not sure what > > to do about that. > U.S. rural areas? :-D Possibly, although I think most people would

Fedora Rawhide-20161011.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Kde live x86_64 Kde live i386 Failed openQA tests: 3/91 (x86_64), 2/16 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20161010.n.0): ID: 40308 Test: i386 Everything-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/40308 ID:

Re: Installation validation test change proposal: merge USB tests into 'default boot and install', add more environment columns

>an optical specific Live Workstation spin Sounds like the proper category: will not block a regular Fedora release, will not consume test resources for primary Fedora deliverables, and will provide a focus for those with some stake in optical media. While lack of community to support an

Re: Trying to install the F24 version of VirtualBox-5.1-5.1.6 in F25

On 10/11/16 14:48, Sérgio Basto wrote: On Ter, 2016-10-11 at 13:37 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote: On 10/11/16 11:47, Ian Kent wrote: On Tue, 2016-10-11 at 11:23 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote: On 11.10.2016 11:15, Ian Kent wrote: On Tue, 2016-10-11 at 16:29 +0800, Ian Kent wrote: [...] I

Re: Trying to install the F24 version of VirtualBox-5.1-5.1.6 in F25

On Ter, 2016-10-11 at 15:46 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote: > On 10/11/16 14:48, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > > On Ter, 2016-10-11 at 13:37 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote: > > > > > > On 10/11/16 11:47, Ian Kent wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 2016-10-11 at 11:23 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote: > > >

Re: Trying to install the F24 version of VirtualBox-5.1-5.1.6 in F25

On Ter, 2016-10-11 at 13:37 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote: > On 10/11/16 11:47, Ian Kent wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2016-10-11 at 11:23 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 11.10.2016 11:15, Ian Kent wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tue, 2016-10-11 at 16:29 +0800, Ian Kent wrote: > > > > > > > >

Re: Trying to install the F24 version of VirtualBox-5.1-5.1.6 in F25

On Tue, 2016-10-11 at 11:23 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote: > > On 11.10.2016 11:15, Ian Kent wrote: > > On Tue, 2016-10-11 at 16:29 +0800, Ian Kent wrote: > > > [...] > > I guess the other thing you could do is grab the libvpx-1.5.0 source rpm and > > give it a different name like libvpx-compat, build

F25 Beta - still not possible to install on usb connected media

Hi, there is still the Anaconda problem of F25 Alpha in F25 Beta. Still not possible to install on usb connected media. Same Dracut error message as previously. Will it be possible to use usb connected media in F25 Final? Now my problem is only, that I can not take part in the testing of Beta,

Re: Installation validation test change proposal: merge USB tests into 'default boot and install', add more environment columns

On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 6:47 AM, Richard Ryniker wrote: >>an optical specific Live Workstation spin > > Sounds like the proper category: will not block a regular Fedora release, > will not consume test resources for primary Fedora deliverables, and will > provide a focus for

Re: Installation validation test change proposal: merge USB tests into 'default boot and install', add more environment columns

On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 12:41 PM, DJ Delorie wrote: > >> U.S. rural areas? :-D > > I'm pretty rural, and even I have good internet. Maybe we need to > redefine "rural" to be independent of physicality :-) Yes it was sort of a ding on the state of affairs in the U.S. rather than

Fedora 23 updates-testing report

The following Fedora 23 Security updates need testing: Age URL 387 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-16240 nagios-4.0.8-1.fc23 345 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-81ded368fe miniupnpc-1.9-6.fc23 318

Fedora 25-20161011.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 7/102 (x86_64), 1/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in 25-20161010.n.0): ID: 40461 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso support_server URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/40461 ID: 40483 Test: x86_64 universal

Fedora 24 updates-testing report

The following Fedora 24 Security updates need testing: Age URL 64 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-32eaf0c41e redis-3.2.3-1.fc24 47 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-0ef628998f chicken-4.11.0-3.fc24 7

Re: Fedora 25-20161011.n.0 compose check report

On Wed, 2016-10-12 at 00:44 +, Fedora compose checker wrote: > No missing expected images. > > Failed openQA tests: 7/102 (x86_64), 1/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm) > > New failures (same test did not fail in 25-20161010.n.0): > > ID: 40461 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso support_server > URL:

[solved ?] samba browsing blocked even with the samba-client service enabled, works with connection/interface in 'trusted' zone

Hi,  Finally someone seems that found the mystery with firewalld, we need open on source port ! more details in [1], Adam can you make it happen for F25 ? also we need test it .  Thanks, [1]  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297235 -- Sérgio M. B.

Fedora 25 updates-testing report

The following Fedora 25 Security updates need testing: Age URL 47 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-9b3ed5f170 chicken-4.11.0-3.fc25 6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-f55f5b10dc freeimage-3.17.0-7.fc25 6

Re: F25 Beta - still not possible to install on usb connected media

Hi Chris, My system is an Acer laptop, bought 2 years ago with Windows 8.1, also EFI. I use AOL since 1995, at this time I had the choice between Compuserve (more for experts) and AOL (more for non experts). I will think about Your proposal. Kind regards -Ursprüngliche

Re: F25 Beta - still not possible to install on usb connected media

On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Joerg Lechner wrote: > Hi, > there is still the Anaconda problem of F25 Alpha in F25 Beta. Still not > possible to install on usb connected media. > Same Dracut error message as previously. Will it be possible to use usb > connected media in

Trying to install the F24 version of VirtualBox-5.1-5.1.6 in F25

Hi testers, I'm trying to install the F24 version of VirtualBox in F25 because no F25 version is available Anybody tried this and was successful? I'm experiencing this error: sudo dnf install VirtualBox-5.1-5.1.6_110634_fedora24-1.x86_64.rpm Last metadata expiration check: 3:04:28 ago on

Re: Trying to install the F24 version of VirtualBox-5.1-5.1.6 in F25

On Tue, 2016-10-11 at 09:56 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote: > Hi testers, > > I'm trying to install the F24 version of VirtualBox in F25 because no > F25 version is available > > Anybody tried this and was successful? > > I'm experiencing this error: > > sudo dnf install

Re: Trying to install the F24 version of VirtualBox-5.1-5.1.6 in F25

On 10/11/16 15:56, Joachim Backes wrote: > Hi testers, > > I'm trying to install the F24 version of VirtualBox in F25 because no F25 > version is > available > > Anybody tried this and was successful? > > I'm experiencing this error: > > sudo dnf install

Re: Trying to install the F24 version of VirtualBox-5.1-5.1.6 in F25

Hi, In changelog of libvpx we can read : - Upgrading: This release is ABI incompatible with 1.5.0 due to a new 'color_range' enum in vpx_image and some minor changes to the VP8_COMP structure. The default key frame interval for VP9 has changed from 128 to . source :

Re: Trying to install the F24 version of VirtualBox-5.1-5.1.6 in F25

On Tue, 2016-10-11 at 16:29 +0800, Ian Kent wrote: > On Tue, 2016-10-11 at 09:56 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote: > > Hi testers, > > > > I'm trying to install the F24 version of VirtualBox in F25 because no > > F25 version is available > > > > Anybody tried this and was successful? > > > > I'm

Re: Trying to install the F24 version of VirtualBox-5.1-5.1.6 in F25

On 11.10.2016 11:15, Ian Kent wrote: On Tue, 2016-10-11 at 16:29 +0800, Ian Kent wrote: [...] I guess the other thing you could do is grab the libvpx-1.5.0 source rpm and give it a different name like libvpx-compat, build and install it then the requirement of VirtualBox should be met

[Test-Announce] Announcing the release of Fedora 25 Beta

The Fedora Project is pleased to announce the immediate availability of Fedora 25 Beta, the next big step on our journey to the exciting Fedora 25 release in November. Fedora's journey is not simply about updating one operating system with the latest and greatest packages. It's also about