[tw] Re: Comments on an online service

2017-08-14 Thread Abraham Samma
I totally agree with you on that. Figuring out end objectives of users is key. You could say we are victims of TW5's success as a diy application. But there are still a lot of application capabilities that remain unexploited by end users because they find it hard to implement them for

[tw] Re: Comments on an online service

2017-08-14 Thread @TiddlyTweeter
Ciao Abraham & Arlen I want to underline this that Abraham wrote as the probably the most important aspect from the point of view of having a decent USP (unique selling proposition)--as far as I can see at the moment. Abraham Samma wrote: > > ... create different downloadable editions that

[tw] Re: Comments on an online service

2017-08-14 Thread Abraham Samma
I find this the most compelling reason to have an online service for managing such such wikis (an edition manager so to speak). You could create different downloadable editions that are automatically hosted, backed up and made public whenever needed (e.g a blogging edition). On Tuesday, August

[tw] Re: Comments on an online service

2017-08-13 Thread 'Sergey Shishkin' via TiddlyWiki
> > https://web.hypothes.is > http://wiki.c2.com/?WelcomeVisitors -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To

Re: [tw] Re: Comments on an online service

2017-08-10 Thread stefct4
Hi, On Wednesday, August 9, 2017 at 4:57:36 AM UTC+2, RichardWilliamSmith wrote: > > > Personally, I'm never going to use a service where "you would get charged > storage plus all of the traffic" unless I'm contracting directly with an > actual service provider. At the very least, I would say,

[tw] Re: Comments on an online service

2017-08-09 Thread @TiddlyTweeter
Ciao Arlen 1 - Would payment be through Amazon? IF SO, that is very *good*. Its proven resilient & pretty clear. 2 - Part of the problem you might face is that the current TYPE of user (i.e. a lot of us in this group) are cheapskates--I can't see you making money from people like us :-) 3 -

Re: [tw] Re: Comments on an online service

2017-08-08 Thread RichardWilliamSmith
Hi Arlen, How do you imagine a service like this would be better than existing storage/hosting solutions? What problem are you trying to solve? (is it about backup, synchronisation, collaboration, hosting or a bit of each?). Personally, I'm never going to use a service where "you would get

Re: [tw] Re: Comments on an online service

2017-08-08 Thread Arlen Beiler
Thanks everyone for the suggestions so far. Keep them coming, this gives me ideas. I don't know what kind of timeframe I'm looking at. It depends on my schedule and everything. What I mean by pay as you go is that you pay for exactly what you use, so if all you have is one thing - a little wiki

[tw] Re: Comments on an online service

2017-08-08 Thread Mat
- Something like the shut down TiddlySpace model (...or maybe that's the same as the TiddlyWeb model?) with tiddlers as first class citizens spanning across wikis so you can concoct TWs out of tiddlers in other TWs. That was extremely cool and useful. - But a big limitation

[tw] Re: Comments on an online service

2017-08-08 Thread stefct4
Lost Admin's suggestions are good. In addition to this, I'd love to see: - Convenient backup and restore - Option to create multiple TiddlyWikis within the same account, with different properties (encrypted versus publicly readable etc.) - Creation of new TiddlyWikis with "one click"

[tw] Re: Comments on an online service

2017-08-08 Thread Lost Admin
The main features *I* would want... 1) Cost significantly less than $3.50 per month (that's what I'm paying now to host wiki.suntrap.ca, which is still experimental) 2) Client side encryption by default so that if there is a breach at amazon (or wherever you host), my data is not put at risk.