Re: [time-nuts] PICTIC II ready-made?

2012-04-29 Thread MailLists
There was also the short lived XPLA2 PZ/XCR3320,3960 (Ph/X) SRAM CPLD family, which had to be configured from an external memory... just another exception which confirms the rule. ftp://ftp.xilinx.com/pub/coolpld/isp/960_conf.pdf The even older intel FLEXlogic, bought by Altera, and rebranded

Re: [time-nuts] PICTIC II ready-made?

2012-04-28 Thread Bruce Griffiths
Not true, the configuration is loaded from EEPROM to RAM on power up. Bruce Azelio Boriani wrote: By preload I think you mean the configuration step of the logic. It seems that the Xilinx one stops the clock after the configuration is done. Anyway using small EEPROM based CPLDs you have no

Re: [time-nuts] PICTIC II ready-made?

2012-04-28 Thread cfo
On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 12:03:20 -0700, Jerry Mulchin wrote: You might want to take a look at the Atmel XMEGA parts. Far more capabilities than the ATMega parts. Watch out . If using an Xmega make sure to select the U ... Usb ones. Most of the non U parts have an errata list longer than the

Re: [time-nuts] PICTIC II ready-made?

2012-04-28 Thread Azelio Boriani
configuration is loaded from EEPROM to RAM on power up For every kind of logic? Even for the simplest XC3000 series (and the Altera equivalent EPM3000 series) small EEPROM CPLD? On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 9:04 AM, cfo xne...@luna.dyndns.dk wrote: On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 12:03:20 -0700, Jerry Mulchin

Re: [time-nuts] PICTIC II ready-made?

2012-04-28 Thread MailLists
I guess you wanted to refer to the old XPLA PZ3k/5k CoolRunner series bought from Philips, renamed XCR3k/5k, and later enhanced to XPLA3/XCR3kXL, not the antique FPGA family XC3k... (C)PLDs don't need an external memory for configuration storing, it's internal. There are also some Lattice,

Re: [time-nuts] PICTIC II ready-made?

2012-04-28 Thread shalimr9
of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com Subject: Re: [time-nuts] PICTIC II ready-made? FPGA with internal flash memory to boot from, yes, but I think that small CPLD haven't to boot anything: they should have the interconnection array associated with the EEPROM cell

Re: [time-nuts] PICTIC II ready-made?

2012-04-28 Thread Bruce Griffiths
Yes, I should have been more specific. The details about the state machine clock behaviour aren't on the datasheet and were obtained by asking Xilinx. The reason for using CMOS RAM to controll the CPLD interconnections is to reduce the static power consumption well below that possible when

Re: [time-nuts] PICTIC II ready-made?

2012-04-28 Thread Jim Lux
On 4/28/12 12:10 PM, shali...@gmail.com wrote: I have not studied CPLDs but Actel has the only true Flash based FPGAs. The flash cells directly control the FPGA fabric. As such, they are mostly immune to Single Event Upset that plagues just about any other FPGA technology, and there is no

Re: [time-nuts] PICTIC II ready-made?

2012-04-28 Thread shalimr9
@febo.com Reply-To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com Subject: Re: [time-nuts] PICTIC II ready-made? On 4/28/12 12:10 PM, shali...@gmail.com wrote: I have not studied CPLDs but Actel has the only true Flash based FPGAs. The flash cells directly control

Re: [time-nuts] PICTIC II ready-made?

2012-04-27 Thread Jim Lux
On 4/26/12 10:46 PM, cfo wrote: On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 14:58:26 -0700, Jim Lux wrote: On 4/26/12 1:24 PM, Hal Murray wrote: albertson.ch...@gmail.com said: 2) The IDE is written in Java and is portable. It is truly identical on all platforms. Yes it uses gcc but the end user never has to

Re: [time-nuts] PICTIC II ready-made?

2012-04-27 Thread Attila Kinali
On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 19:17:43 -0300 Daniel Mendes dmend...@gmail.com wrote: About replacing the 74ACT175... there´s a company called Potato Semi (well.. they make chips, right?) whose sole business is to make damn fast 74 logic. Their chips can be bought at ebay in small quantities. Look at

Re: [time-nuts] PICTIC II ready-made?

2012-04-27 Thread cfo
On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 06:21:10 -0700, Jim Lux wrote: It uses a 100% standard avr-gcc toolchain as backend , and just creates the commandline call for using that. So avr-gcc , avr-as , avr-ar , avr-objcopy etc. are used behind the curtains. Fascinating.. Are avr-* also java? Or are there

Re: [time-nuts] PICTIC II ready-made?

2012-04-27 Thread David
On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 15:52:33 +0200, Attila Kinali att...@kinali.ch wrote: On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 19:17:43 -0300 Daniel Mendes dmend...@gmail.com wrote: About replacing the 74ACT175... there´s a company called Potato Semi (well.. they make chips, right?) whose sole business is to make damn fast

Re: [time-nuts] PICTIC II ready-made?

2012-04-27 Thread Attila Kinali
On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 23:30:45 -0500 David davidwh...@gmail.com wrote: If you add a second lower current source or sink, then you can get away with a LM311 class comparator and one fast timer channel in the microcontroller. The input pulse width charges the capacitor and the timer counts how

Re: [time-nuts] PICTIC II ready-made?

2012-04-27 Thread EWKehren
The Altera Max 3000A as I mentioned before will do all TTL devices, it has an extensive library easy to use and very cheap. All That at 200 MHz. I became a believer and others I introduced to it love it to. In an hour from downloading the free software you can have your first design. If I

Re: [time-nuts] PICTIC II ready-made?

2012-04-27 Thread Bob Camp
...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On Behalf Of Attila Kinali Sent: Friday, April 27, 2012 10:30 AM To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement Subject: Re: [time-nuts] PICTIC II ready-made? On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 23:30:45 -0500 David davidwh...@gmail.com wrote: If you add a second

Re: [time-nuts] PICTIC II ready-made?

2012-04-27 Thread David
On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 16:30:11 +0200, Attila Kinali att...@kinali.ch wrote: On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 23:30:45 -0500 David davidwh...@gmail.com wrote: If you add a second lower current source or sink, then you can get away with a LM311 class comparator and one fast timer channel in the

Re: [time-nuts] PICTIC II ready-made?

2012-04-27 Thread David
I have been looking at CPLD and FPGA designs for aggregating the logic required but keep running up against their lack of jitter specifications for asynchronous applications. Is the part and development cost worth replacing a handful of discrete logic when the CPLD or FPGA is dedicated to such a

Re: [time-nuts] PICTIC II ready-made?

2012-04-27 Thread EWKehren
Contact me off list and I will be glad to work with you. Test board etc. Bert Kehren In a message dated 4/27/2012 2:36:45 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, davidwh...@gmail.com writes: I have been looking at CPLD and FPGA designs for aggregating the logic required but keep running up against

Re: [time-nuts] PICTIC II ready-made?

2012-04-27 Thread Jerry Mulchin
You might want to take a look at the Atmel XMEGA parts. Far more capabilities than the ATMega parts. Brief description: • Atmel AVR CPU - Clock speed to 32MHz • Memories • DMAC - Direct memory access controller • Event system • System clock and clock options • Power management and sleep modes •

Re: [time-nuts] PICTIC II ready-made?

2012-04-27 Thread Bruce Griffiths
The Wilkinson TDC (dual slope) has been successfully used for decades in nuclear instrumentation. One problem is in switching the discharge current on and off sufficiently quickly. This can be largely circumvented by having it on all the time. One drawback is the slow conversion speed (100us

Re: [time-nuts] PICTIC II ready-made?

2012-04-27 Thread Azelio Boriani
By preload I think you mean the configuration step of the logic. It seems that the Xilinx one stops the clock after the configuration is done. Anyway using small EEPROM based CPLDs you have no clock at all: there is no configuration to load. On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 10:01 PM, Bruce Griffiths

Re: [time-nuts] PICTIC II ready-made?

2012-04-27 Thread David
On Sat, 28 Apr 2012 08:01:43 +1200, Bruce Griffiths bruce.griffi...@xtra.co.nz wrote: The Wilkinson TDC (dual slope) has been successfully used for decades in nuclear instrumentation. One problem is in switching the discharge current on and off sufficiently quickly. This can be largely

Re: [time-nuts] PICTIC II ready-made?

2012-04-27 Thread David
On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 22:13:55 +0200, Azelio Boriani azelio.bori...@screen.it wrote: By preload I think you mean the configuration step of the logic. It seems that the Xilinx one stops the clock after the configuration is done. Anyway using small EEPROM based CPLDs you have no clock at all: there

Re: [time-nuts] PICTIC II ready-made?

2012-04-27 Thread Azelio Boriani
FPGA with internal flash memory to boot from, yes, but I think that small CPLD haven't to boot anything: they should have the interconnection array associated with the EEPROM cell array. On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 11:52 PM, David davidwh...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 22:13:55 +0200,

Re: [time-nuts] PICTIC II ready-made?

2012-04-27 Thread Chris Albertson
It uses a 100% standard avr-gcc toolchain as backend , and just creates the commandline call for using that. So avr-gcc , avr-as , avr-ar , avr-objcopy etc. are used behind the curtains. Fascinating.. Are avr-* also java? Or are there just binary versions that run on all platforms?

Re: [time-nuts] PICTIC II ready-made?

2012-04-27 Thread EWKehren
correct Bert Kehren In a message dated 4/27/2012 6:58:32 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, azelio.bori...@screen.it writes: FPGA with internal flash memory to boot from, yes, but I think that small CPLD haven't to boot anything: they should have the interconnection array associated with the

Re: [time-nuts] PICTIC II ready-made?...nanode

2012-04-26 Thread Andrew Back
On 26 April 2012 01:27, Chris Albertson albertson.ch...@gmail.com wrote: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raspberry_Pi I just read the above page.  The Raspberry contains close source drivers and binary blob graphics firmware.   That is an 100% deal killer. It's unfortunate that it makes use of

Re: [time-nuts] PICTIC II ready-made?

2012-04-26 Thread EWKehren
Has any one considered asking Richard. As far as logic is concerned a 200 MHz Altera MAX 3000A makes a perfect substitute at a cost of $ 2.50 that includes a very solderable socket. Works Bert Kehren In a message dated 4/25/2012 3:16:51 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,

Re: [time-nuts] PICTIC II ready-made?

2012-04-26 Thread Dan Kemppainen
] PICTIC II ready-made? Message-ID:4795269806DF49A7B26877D7EB657063@StanleyPC Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-1; reply-type=original I still have a supply of boards and most parts including the 74ac175 but no interest in assembly or the kitting process. If someone would

Re: [time-nuts] PICTIC II ready-made?...nanode

2012-04-26 Thread Don Latham
25, 2012 7:39 PM Subject: Re: [time-nuts] PICTIC II ready-made? On 25 April 2012 19:09, Randy D. Hunt randy_hunt...@yahoo.com wrote: Then there is also the matter of surface mount components. Some people my not physically be able to work with them, learning to solder or not. I am rapidly

Re: [time-nuts] PICTIC II ready-made?

2012-04-26 Thread Hal Murray
albertson.ch...@gmail.com said: 2) The IDE is written in Java and is portable. It is truly identical on all platforms. Yes it uses gcc but the end user never has to deal with gcc or even know what gcc is. Same with saving your code, hit just puts it some place and keeps track of it Do I

Re: [time-nuts] PICTIC II ready-made?

2012-04-26 Thread Jim Lux
On 4/26/12 1:24 PM, Hal Murray wrote: albertson.ch...@gmail.com said: 2) The IDE is written in Java and is portable. It is truly identical on all platforms. Yes it uses gcc but the end user never has to deal with gcc or even know what gcc is. Same with saving your code, hit just puts it

Re: [time-nuts] PICTIC II ready-made?

2012-04-26 Thread Chris Albertson
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 1:24 PM, Hal Murray hmur...@megapathdsl.net wrote: albertson.ch...@gmail.com said: 2) The IDE is written in Java and is portable. It is truly identical on all platforms. Yes it uses gcc but the end user never has to deal with gcc or even know what gcc is. Same

Re: [time-nuts] PICTIC II ready-made?

2012-04-26 Thread Chris Albertson
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Don Latham d...@montana.com wrote: OK, Chris, I'll bite. What the heck is a tool chain? It is the series (or chain) of software tools you need to use. Text editor, compiler, linker and whatever you need to program the chip and then maybe a debugger and maybe

Re: [time-nuts] PICTIC II ready-made?

2012-04-26 Thread Andrew Rodland
Hal Murray hmurray@... writes: albertson.chris@... said: 2) The IDE is written in Java and is portable. It is truly identical on all platforms. Yes it uses gcc but the end user never has to deal with gcc or even know what gcc is. Same with saving your code, hit just puts it some

Re: [time-nuts] PICTIC II ready-made?

2012-04-26 Thread Dennis Ferguson
On 27 Apr, 2012, at 02:57 , Chris Albertson wrote: Closed source drivers and binary blob firmware.I'd have nothing to do with a project that includes either of those. I'd require a open source platforms with a 100% free tool chain. Also, it is a bit of overkill after all a bare PIC

Re: [time-nuts] PICTIC II ready-made?

2012-04-26 Thread cfo
On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 14:58:26 -0700, Jim Lux wrote: On 4/26/12 1:24 PM, Hal Murray wrote: albertson.ch...@gmail.com said: 2) The IDE is written in Java and is portable. It is truly identical on all platforms. Yes it uses gcc but the end user never has to deal with gcc or even know what gcc

[time-nuts] PICTIC II ready-made?

2012-04-25 Thread Bill Dailey
I have wondered the same thing. Doc KX0O ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.

Re: [time-nuts] PICTIC II ready-made?

2012-04-25 Thread Attila Kinali
On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 02:01:36 + (UTC) Andrew Rodland and...@cleverdomain.org wrote: Would anyone be willing to sell (or loan for an extended period) one or two ready-to-go PICTIC IIs within the United States? I realize this may be rude to ask since it's a hobby project, but what can I say?

Re: [time-nuts] PICTIC II ready-made?

2012-04-25 Thread Azelio Boriani
I agree, nevertheless let me add: because it is a hobby project it is good also starting to learn how to use the soldering iron. On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Attila Kinali att...@kinali.ch wrote: On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 02:01:36 + (UTC) Andrew Rodland and...@cleverdomain.org wrote:

Re: [time-nuts] PICTIC II ready-made?

2012-04-25 Thread Attila Kinali
On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 15:24:50 +0200 Azelio Boriani azelio.bori...@screen.it wrote: I agree, nevertheless let me add: because it is a hobby project it is good also starting to learn how to use the soldering iron. But for that, you need someone who shows you how to solder. You can learn it

Re: [time-nuts] PICTIC II ready-made?

2012-04-25 Thread Azelio Boriani
Yes, better have someone who can help but nothing should prevent you from learning something. On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 4:44 PM, Attila Kinali att...@kinali.ch wrote: On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 15:24:50 +0200 Azelio Boriani azelio.bori...@screen.it wrote: I agree, nevertheless let me add: because it

Re: [time-nuts] PICTIC II ready-made?

2012-04-25 Thread Chris Albertson
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 5:50 AM, Bill Dailey docdai...@gmail.com wrote: I have wondered the same thing. It might be time for a group project to design a Pictic III that uses parts that are readily available. Today I'd build it around an Arduino rather than a PIC even if the cost is more.

Re: [time-nuts] PICTIC II ready-made?

2012-04-25 Thread Don Latham
Chris: I concur. Arduino base would allow simple extension to 'net control as well. Don Chris Albertson It might be time for a group project to design a Pictic III that uses parts that are readily available. Today I'd build it around an Arduino rather than a PIC even if the cost is more.

Re: [time-nuts] PICTIC II ready-made?

2012-04-25 Thread Don Latham
I forgot to add that a simple redrafting of the II as an Arduino shield with appropriate chips and chip passives would accomplish the desired end without losing the very careful engineering and testing that has already been done? Would be nice to have a way to change caps without soldering as

Re: [time-nuts] PICTIC II ready-made?

2012-04-25 Thread Stanley
at time :-( Stanley - Original Message - From: Don Latham d...@montana.com To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2012 11:37 AM Subject: Re: [time-nuts] PICTIC II ready-made? I forgot to add that a simple redrafting

Re: [time-nuts] PICTIC II ready-made?

2012-04-25 Thread Randy D. Hunt
On 4/25/2012 7:44 AM, Attila Kinali wrote: On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 15:24:50 +0200 Azelio Borianiazelio.bori...@screen.it wrote: I agree, nevertheless let me add: because it is a hobby project it is good also starting to learn how to use the soldering iron. But for that, you need someone who

Re: [time-nuts] PICTIC II ready-made?

2012-04-25 Thread Chris Albertson
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Don Latham d...@montana.com wrote: I forgot to add that a simple redrafting of the II as an Arduino shield with appropriate chips and chip passives would accomplish the desired end without losing the very careful engineering and testing that has already been

Re: [time-nuts] PICTIC II ready-made?

2012-04-25 Thread Chris Albertson
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Randy D. Hunt randy_hunt...@yahoo.comwrote: Then there is also the matter of surface mount components. Some people my not physically be able to work with them, learning to solder or not. I am rapidly joining that group be cause of my vision. Get yourself a

Re: [time-nuts] PICTIC II ready-made?

2012-04-25 Thread Andrew Back
On 25 April 2012 19:09, Randy D. Hunt randy_hunt...@yahoo.com wrote: Then there is also the matter of surface mount components.  Some people my not physically be able to work with them, learning to solder or not.  I am rapidly joining that group be cause of my vision. Since Arduino has been

Re: [time-nuts] PICTIC II ready-made?

2012-04-25 Thread Chris Albertson
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Andrew Back and...@carrierdetect.comwrote: On 25 April 2012 19:09, Randy D. Hunt randy_hunt...@yahoo.com wrote: Then there is also the matter of surface mount components. Some people my not physically be able to work with them, learning to solder or not.

Re: [time-nuts] PICTIC II ready-made?

2012-04-25 Thread Attila Kinali
On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 08:45:52 -0700 Chris Albertson albertson.ch...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 5:50 AM, Bill Dailey docdai...@gmail.com wrote: I have wondered the same thing. It might be time for a group project to design a Pictic III that uses parts that are readily

Re: [time-nuts] PICTIC II ready-made?

2012-04-25 Thread Bruce Griffiths
Chris Albertson wrote: On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Don Lathamd...@montana.com wrote: I forgot to add that a simple redrafting of the II as an Arduino shield with appropriate chips and chip passives would accomplish the desired end without losing the very careful engineering and

Re: [time-nuts] PICTIC II ready-made?

2012-04-25 Thread Robert Darlington
] PICTIC II ready-made? I forgot to add that a simple redrafting of the II as an Arduino shield with appropriate chips and chip passives would accomplish the desired end without losing the very careful engineering and testing that has already been done? Would be nice to have a way to change caps

Re: [time-nuts] PICTIC II ready-made?

2012-04-25 Thread Bruce Griffiths
Attila Kinali wrote: Hi Bruce, On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 07:15:41 +1200 Bruce Griffithsbruce.griffi...@xtra.co.nz wrote: If a suitable ADC is used the interpolator can be simplified considerably whilst improving its performance. Could you tell a little bit more about what a suitable ADC

Re: [time-nuts] PICTIC II ready-made?

2012-04-25 Thread Attila Kinali
On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 08:00:17 +1200 Bruce Griffiths bruce.griffi...@xtra.co.nz wrote: If a capacitive input charge redistribution ADC is used the interpolator output capacitor can be directly connected to it. This eliminates the output buffer amp with its unknown settling time as well as the

Re: [time-nuts] PICTIC II ready-made?

2012-04-25 Thread Daniel Mendes
About replacing the 74ACT175... there´s a company called Potato Semi (well.. they make chips, right?) whose sole business is to make damn fast 74 logic. Their chips can be bought at ebay in small quantities. Look at this 600MHz D flip flop:

Re: [time-nuts] PICTIC II ready-made?

2012-04-25 Thread Chris Albertson
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Attila Kinali att...@kinali.ch wrote: On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 08:45:52 -0700 Chris Albertson albertson.ch...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 5:50 AM, Bill Dailey docdai...@gmail.com wrote: I have wondered the same thing. It might be time

Re: [time-nuts] PICTIC II ready-made?

2012-04-25 Thread WB6BNQ
Chris, Your undying devotion to the Arduino is laudable. However, the point that i think you are missing is such functionality is also available on other platforms with the same amount of ease and support. If you take someone who has never seen, touched nor had any knowledge of any computing

Re: [time-nuts] PICTIC II ready-made?...nanode

2012-04-25 Thread Alan Melia
Message - From: Andrew Back and...@carrierdetect.com To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2012 7:39 PM Subject: Re: [time-nuts] PICTIC II ready-made? On 25 April 2012 19:09, Randy D. Hunt randy_hunt...@yahoo.com wrote

[time-nuts] PICTIC II ready-made?

2012-04-25 Thread Bill Dailey
Rasberry pi appears to have fallen victim to poor pre market research. Essentially vapor for now. Don't know when you can get one. I have been looking to get one since march. RadioShack carries arduino. Doc KX0O ___ time-nuts mailing list --

Re: [time-nuts] PICTIC II ready-made?

2012-04-25 Thread Chris Albertson
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 4:24 PM, WB6BNQ wb6...@cox.net wrote: Chris, Your undying devotion to the Arduino is laudable. However, the point that i think you are missing is such functionality is also available on other platforms with the same amount of ease and support. If you take someone

Re: [time-nuts] PICTIC II ready-made?

2012-04-25 Thread Cliff Sojourner
two thumbs up for Radio Shack - they sure have their problems but they are all we have in a lot of places. with the new Velleman and Arduino and Basic Stamp kits, they are clearly trying. they have a ways to go, but I try to vote with my $$$ a little bit. Cliff K6CLS On 2012-04-25 16:41,

Re: [time-nuts] PICTIC II ready-made?

2012-04-25 Thread David
On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 11:13:42 -0700, Chris Albertson albertson.ch...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Don Latham d...@montana.com wrote: I forgot to add that a simple redrafting of the II as an Arduino shield with appropriate chips and chip passives would accomplish the desired

Re: [time-nuts] PICTIC II ready-made?

2012-04-25 Thread David
On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 21:26:25 +0200, Attila Kinali att...@kinali.ch wrote: Hi Bruce, On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 07:15:41 +1200 Bruce Griffiths bruce.griffi...@xtra.co.nz wrote: If a suitable ADC is used the interpolator can be simplified considerably whilst improving its performance. Could you tell

[time-nuts] PICTIC II ready-made?

2012-04-24 Thread Andrew Rodland
I've been having a lot of fun with this time-nut stuff over the past year or so, and I'm thinking about going atomic in the next year (GPSDRbO), but I'm a microprocessor kind of guy, and I have incredibly clumsy hands with electronics and soldering. As much, I'm wondering: Would anyone be willing