Amy Roh wrote:
I just fixed this. Thanks for pointing it out.
Thanks. The last String related bug was worse though ;)
Rémy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jess Holle wrote:
Given all the time and energy you put into this Remy, I can completely
understand.
On the flip side, the overall community would be best served by getting
as solid of a point release as possible out sooner rather than later.
If the current 5.0.22 tag is the best you/we have ti
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Hi,
I don't think we should relase a "stable" with a few bugs we can fix
easily,
a lot of people don't read the release notes,
and might start filing bugs against them, so we will lose the time
later
anyway. There were several check ins after the tag, from different
committers
Jess Holle wrote:
I'm not a committer, but...
Given the number of "did you get _ important fix xyz _?" mails, it
seems to make sense to re-tag.
It has been a while since a public release and it would be nice to have
a public release with this latest flurry of fixes (i.e. so maybe the
publi
Peter Rossbach wrote:
Release 5.0.22 as Stable:
[ ] Yes
[ ] No
I vote -1
Autodeploy with HostConfig not working correct with Windows.
see my bug report with a fix.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28262
Windows is a very broken platform, and I don't quite care about this
issue
Henri Gomez wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Release 5.0.22 as Stable:
[ ] Yes
[ ] No
I've tested the new Windows wrapper, and it did work for me (and it
looks as if we did hire some M$ guy to do its UI). However, some more
testing is needed (note: it's not suppoed to work on Win
Mladen Turk wrote
There was a bug in the service.bat (now fixed in the CVS) caused by missing
quotations.
I've also updated the prunsvc so that manager gets shut down on uninstall,
and -Xss now uses KB instead Bytes, so you don't need to round that yourself
on the 1024 byte boundary.
Can you repack
Release 5.0.22 as Stable:
[ ] Yes
[ ] No
I've tested the new Windows wrapper, and it did work for me (and it
looks as if we did hire some M$ guy to do its UI). However, some more
testing is needed (note: it's not suppoed to work on Win9x for now).
Another "risky" change is the upgrade to Xerces
Mark Roth wrote:
Hi Mark
Here's a little essay on the relationship between the JSR and PHP.
Feel free to forward it.
JSR 223 defines an API used to embed scripting engines in Java
applications. As a special case, it defines a class of Servlets that
host scripting engines. The engines generate web
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
luehe 2004/04/07 14:34:12
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core
StandardContext.java
Log:
When the webapp specific JspServlet inherits the mappings from the
global JspServlet, we need to wipe out the wrapper correspo
New new build here:
http://www.apache.org/dist/jakarta/tomcat-5/v5.0.22-alpha/
Rémy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Henri Gomez wrote:
Hi to all,
Mladen discussed about using PHP from Tomcat.
Jean-Frederic Clere make some tests during his vacation
and send me the following mail to be forwarded to the list :
Good news, tomcat+php it's easy, php allready have support for.
They don't advetise a lot ;) Is th
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mturk 2004/04/07 04:33:40
Modified:.tomcat.nsi build.xml
Log:
Use the new Procrun 2.0
The new procrun looks professional. It seems really good quality overall
(I do have a bad feeling about Win9x). The log viewer is gone though.
Rémy
Mladen Turk wrote:
I plan to tag 5.0.22 tomorrow. Any objections ?
What about new procrun?
I'm having all the patches ready and tested, and tomcat.nsi changed and
tested.
Ah ...
Well, you can try to commit them. Since this is untested, if there's a
problem, I'll use the old one.
What do you think
I plan to tag 5.0.22 tomorrow. Any objections ?
Rémy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Henri Gomez wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
Hi to all,
I've got problems with some highly stressed applications using jk or jk2
and tomcat 3.3.2 (same thing with TC 5.0.x).
I see many errors like these in log :
in TC 3.3.2 and 5.0.19 :
Mar 19, 2004 1:47:51 PM org.apache.jk.common
Bill Barker wrote:
I'm -0 on this. The classes modified are all internal to the Tomcat 5.x
CoyoteConnector, so there is no good reason to make them public.
The way that Coyote is designed, this should always be unnecessary. The way
to build a new connector is to define a new ProtocolHandler that
Mladen Turk wrote:
Hi,
After a long time here is the preview:
http://jakarta.apache.org/~mturk/procrun2M3.zip
This is a totally rewritten version of a procrun with couple of significant
changes.
It finally doesn't need the java.exe to redirect TC's stdout/stderr.
Those can be redirected to the sam
Mark Thomas wrote:
From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mark Thomas wrote:
Fixing bug 13040 requires an additional patch that uses
equals() for the whole
algorithm. Hence the complications. This is what I was
discussing above.
The matching rule can't be fully implemented AFA
Remy Maucherat wrote:
2. The admin application shows the following structure:
* Tomcat Server
|_ null (Catalina)
|_ null (localhost)
and only displays a partial list of the registered apps.
Also see java.lang.NullPointerException -
java.net.URLEncoder.encode
NormW wrote:
Good morning All.
In trying the 5.0.21 alpha release of Tomcat, note two problems:-
1. Passing the 'stop' command initiates unload but the process hangs at the
following point -
INFO: unregistering logger Catalina: type=logger
Also noted in 5.0.19.
No.
2. The admin application
Costin Manolache wrote:
If you're worried about risk, then probably glueing PHP with tomcat will
be a bad choice.
Tomcat is limited by Java's bad support for integration with native
code. Apache will have no problem running Php, perl, python, .net or
integrating with any native library that exi
Mark Thomas wrote:
Fixing bug 13040 requires an additional patch that uses equals() for the whole
algorithm. Hence the complications. This is what I was discussing above.
The matching rule can't be fully implemented AFAIK. I think the current
algorithm is a nice compromise.
Please give examples wh
Mark Thomas wrote:
OK then. Now for the tricky bit. Bug 13040
(http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13040) highlights a rather
knotty problem. Having mulled this over for the last few days I have come to the
conclusion that we should be using equals() rather than startsWith()
My reaso
Mark Thomas wrote:
Remy,
Looking at bug 13040 I did a bugzilla search and came across bug 11411. I am
still thinking about bug 13040 but saw that bug 11411 could be fixed (I had
previously closed it without looking at the source closely enough) without
getting into the equals()/startsWith() debate
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
fhanik 2004/04/01 13:06:50
Modified:modules/cluster/src/share/org/apache/catalina/cluster/session
DeltaSession.java
Log:
bugfix for 28131, thanks to rainer.jung -at- kippdata.de
So I assume you're going to want a 5.0.22 ? :(
This is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
markt 2004/04/01 12:09:21
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core
ApplicationContext.java
Log:
- Fix getContext("/") so current context is returned if called whilst in the root
context
- Port from TC5
I disagree with
Mladen Turk wrote:
What do you want to do?
- Call native methods in TC to get PHP running.
- Write a servlet engine that understands PHP. (Well the
problem would be the libraries).
If a majority of my web content is a dynamic one, delivered through JSP,
PHP, or what ever, why would I need a dummy
Mladen Turk wrote:
mod_php inside TC.
How does that work ?
I found out that TC is only 8% slower the Apache2.x.
8% for doing what ?
(this will heavily depend on the VM you're using, anyway, so try JRockit
to get the good results :) )
So if I need PHP and JSP, the Apache2 is total overhead.
You
http://www.apache.org/dist/jakarta/tomcat-5/v5.0.21-alpha/
Rémy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Henri Gomez wrote:
I'm playing with compression actually and I see that we don't have
GzipInputFilter.
Apache 2.0 mod_deflate has support for it and it could be usefull.
It's a rather specific need, but if you can add it why not.
(and the issue is the same as the output: to make it efficient, we wo
Stig Sørensen wrote:
Hi all
As a user of Tomcat on NetWare, I've been trying to make Tomcat 5.0.19
work on NetWare6. With a proper startup script, Tomcat 5.0.19 works "out
of the box" on NetWare, except for one (major) JSP issue. Tomcat fails
to rename newly recompiled JSP's from *.classtmp to *
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Ok. Yes, I heard about that. I think it should be in jakarta-tomcat-5
instead, BTW.
The CVS module doesn't matter as much as the fact NOTICE (and LICENSE)
need to end up in the top-level directory of our distribution when it's
unpacked. From where does the build dist take the
Jess Holle wrote:
I'm not arguing with the overall intent of your change. Rather I
believe that calling the constructor during compilation is wasteful and
improper as the environment *can* differ between compilation and
runtime. Also, the fact that a failure to compile in this fashion
generat
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Note that we must properly reference MX4J and NSIS in our NOTICE file
for this release. I see the file (in jakarta-tomcat-catalina/NOTICE)
hasn't changed since I created it a month ago. If no one beats me to
it, I'll make the changes later today.
Ok. Yes, I heard about that.
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Hi,
I'll unsubscribe and send a congratulations message! ;)
Since I now also wield the Supreme Power (TM), I already unsubscribed her :)
Rémy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional command
Mladen Turk wrote:
Bill did some bug fixes and updates, but I'm afraid he didn't done any
jtc/procrun binary builds.
I can do that but only later this evening.
I can wait until later today for new binaries, no problem.
Rémy
-
To
Mladen Turk wrote:
From: Remy Maucherat
I got approval from Geir (the PMC chair) to ship with MX4J
and the installer.
So there will be a new 5.0.21 tag today, with new binaries :)
That's really good news.
Hope it'll last for a while :)
BTW, are there any new procrun binaries for
Remy Maucherat wrote:
I did post a message on the PMC list asking for a final word on our
binary dependencies (installer + JMX).
I'm also wondering if it whould be a good idea to pick up the latest
Jasper fixes in a 5.0.21 tag.
I got approval from Geir (the PMC chair) to ship with MX4J an
I did post a message on the PMC list asking for a final word on our
binary dependencies (installer + JMX).
I'm also wondering if it whould be a good idea to pick up the latest
Jasper fixes in a 5.0.21 tag.
Rémy
-
To unsubscribe
Bill Barker wrote:
Other than the fact that JBoss doesn't use JK2, this is invalid why?
I don't find general comments on the docs to be very useful in a bug
report. Patches I can understand.
JBoss obviously uses JK 2.
Rémy
-
To
I saw this nice post on the Geronimo list, and I feel insulted.
> Two full-blown articles on the topic is forthcoming in the coming
weeks. I want
>to take the time and care necessary to convey my various points in the
most
> positive and constructive way I can. I'll send a link to this list
a
Jeanfrancois Arcand wrote:
Hi,
I would like to propose two modifications:
[1] XML Validation
I would like to make two changes to the way xml validation is implemented:
(1) make the attribute available at the context level (turned off by
default)
(2) add supports for
Jess Holle wrote:
Jess Holle wrote:
Works just great in quick testing at least.
I'm still waiting for my precompilation script to return to determine
whether Jasper still compiles everything it used to (and should have).
Unfortunately, Tomcat 5.0.20 cannot compile 6 out our 985 JSP pages
(whi
Henri Gomez wrote:
jk2 2.0.4 has been tagged.
jk2_2_0_4
We're now in HEAD at 2.0.5-dev
Congratulations :)
Rémy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sriram N wrote:
--- "n. alex rupp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It's true. Tomcat's 95% ready. It took me about a week to learn enough
about
GBeans and Catalina to get a bolt-on version of Tomcat running inside
Geronimo,
so we don't need a jumpstart. It isn't in the code base right now because
the
Jess Holle wrote:
I concur that this is the normal expectation and that the Tomcat group
should pressure the board to ease up.
If they don't I might suggest:
* A simple Ant-based configuration tool.
o That grabs jmx.jar from the web as part of the configuration.
I use Ant to configur
Jess Holle wrote:
Can you elaborate on "may not be very useful"?
Generally, people expect to be able to run a binary out of the box.
So if I drop jmx.jar from 5.0.19 into 5.0.20's bin directory, what else
is missing to have Tomcat 5.0.20 be every bit as good as 5.0.19 but with
more bug fixes?
No
Angus Mezick wrote:
With the death of the windows installer, (thanks for making my life
more difficult nitwit board), how do we install tomcat as a service.
I didn't see a .reg file include in the distro. Will there be one?
Should we just use this tool:
http://web.bvu.edu/staff/david/index.jsp?sec
Angus Mezick wrote:
For clairification. Tomcat.exe is just a wrapper that calls out to
the .jar files, right? So there is no reason for it to change with
every build? --Angus
Well, there are bugfixes to the said wrapper sometimes.
Rémy
--
Ronald Wildenberg wrote:
This site says in the second note that jmx.jar should be copied
to ${catalina.home}/bin/jmx.jar.
Shouldn't this be ${catalina.home}/common/lib ?
No.
Rémy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For ad
Bill Barker wrote:
I'm guessing that tomcat(w).exe are the old ones from 5.0.19?
It's whatever is in CVS. So here it's the same as for 5.0.19 (which
AFAIK didn't have major issues).
Rémy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTE
The new build is now available (a bit late, but with additional fixes).
Thanks for the help with the license transition and the bugfixing.
http://www.apache.org/dist/jakarta/tomcat-5/v5.0.20-alpha/
This has no JMX and no Windows installer.
The build may not be very useful except for basic regressi
Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26275
it turned out, that Tomcat suffers from a problem in Java's zip file
handling, which persists since years and most probably won't be fixed in
the
next years. It also turned out, that the problem could be fixed by
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Hi,
5.0.20 wasn't tagged for obvious reasons, and I propose postponing the
tag to the end of next week (friday seems a good target).
I'll tag likely on Sunday, as I need to fix a bug before (27752).
I identified the following tasks:
- update the jakarta-servletap
Filip Hanik (lists) wrote:
Politics require mature representation...and
are we sure that Tomcat has this.
We have Costin :)
Unless becoming a TLP gives us an instant advantage or will change some
things that really do need to change, is it worth the time and effort. IMHO
becoming a TLP should have
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Maybe, but the Geronimo front page
(http://incubator.apache.org/geronimo/index.html) says
"The aim of the project is to produce a large and healthy community of
J2EE developers tasked with the development of an open source, certified
J2EE server, that is ASF licensed and passes
Sriram N wrote:
Like JBoss hires our Remy and therefore Geronimo (coredeveloper-based) does not
use Tomcat ?
Lol.
I'm no committer, but I dare say that there's nothing to stop Tomcat Developers
from helping out with Geronimo tomcat integration..
Sorry, I have no time (and think you are wasting you
Mladen Turk wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Henri Gomez
Hi to all,
Just see that Struts is becaming a top level project, like
ant last year.
What's your opinions on moving Tomcat as top level project ?
-1
Why would we need that?
Because we don't have any leverage on the ASF deci
Henri Gomez wrote:
Hi to all,
Just see that Struts is becaming a top level project, like ant
last year.
What's your opinions on moving Tomcat as top level project ?
I was against it, but given the recent board decisions, I think we
really need more leverage :(
Rémy
-
Henri Gomez wrote:
Hi to all,
jk2 2.0.4 seems in a good shape and I'd like to thanks all of
you commiter, and tomcat-dev members for your feedback, patches
and time.
I'd like to see Guenter Knauf promoted to commiter since he
provided us may fine patches on jk2 and help make this release
happen.
W
Bill Barker wrote:
Since from section 3.3 of the JSP spec, jsp-property-groups are translation
time mappings, the only "clean" solution I can see would be to implement
something like the TC 3.3 JspInterceptor (obviously, changed to a JspValve
:) that would handle the pre-compilation checks with the
Remy Maucherat wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
luehe 2004/03/16 11:24:59
Modified:util/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/http/mapper Mapper.java
MappingData.java
Log:
Fix for Bugzilla 27664 ("Welcome files not found in combination with
jsp-property-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
luehe 2004/03/16 11:24:59
Modified:util/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/http/mapper Mapper.java
MappingData.java
Log:
Fix for Bugzilla 27664 ("Welcome files not found in combination with
jsp-property-group")
Rather than having th
Mark Thomas wrote:
Please can one of the moderators remove this address from the tomcat-dev mailing
list.
When there's a problem on the list, usually the best is to mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rémy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PR
Hi,
5.0.20 wasn't tagged for obvious reasons, and I propose postponing the
tag to the end of next week (friday seems a good target).
I identified the following tasks:
- update the jakarta-servletapi-5 module to the new license
- update the jakarta-tomcat-jasper module to the new license
- and as
Henri Gomez wrote:
Please subscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and follow the thread about
'clarification'.
It seems there is a discussion on having non ASF binaries :
2) state that the ASF will allow the use of its infrastructure for the
distribution of binary objects that are legally distribut
Henri Gomez wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
remm2004/03/12 06:35:45
Modified:.build.xml
Log:
- Don't bother about the other JMX related binaries.
Revision ChangesPath
1.180 +0 -6 jakarta-tomcat-5/build.xml
Index: build.xml
==
Henri Gomez wrote:
Well I didn't agreed on moving TC binaries to sf or others.
I mentioned that being also involved in projet like Jpackage, I know
that's producing ready to use packages is not so easy, expecially when
you have to explain to users that they have to get MANY external jars
from outs
Henri Gomez wrote:
This is not a complete prohibition on all third-party jars or libraries,
but
only on those third-party libraries which are licensed under terms more
restrictive than the ASL.
In the case of mx4j, the code is licenced under the mx4j 1.0 License
[1], which
is a derivative of the
Bill Barker wrote:
I agree with Yoav that we can afford to wait a few days (if only so I don't
have to take down the 3.3.2 binary distro :). However, I don't think that,
without the ASF changing it's position, we can simply add some lines to the
LICENSE file. That may work in C land, but in Java
Hi,
There are some problems with the next release, with the decision from
the ASF board to mandate that all ASF releases are to be made of 100%
ASL 2.0 licensed components (as a side note, I'd like to add that this
is obviously a terrible decision). This has many consequences and some
question
Remy Maucherat wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
luehe 2004/03/10 20:18:31
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/session
StandardSession.java
Log:
Fixed regression re: Bugtraq 4839736
("HttpSession.setMaxInactiveInterval() doesn't
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
luehe 2004/03/10 20:18:31
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/session
StandardSession.java
Log:
Fixed regression re: Bugtraq 4839736
("HttpSession.setMaxInactiveInterval() doesn't behave as expected"),
which had been
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
remm2004/03/05 05:08:00
Modified:util/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/buf CharChunk.java
Log:
- Same fix.
- Make calls to realReads compatible with marking (which is just for cleaness,
as the parameters are not used in our use case).
- Make makeSpace
Amy Roh wrote:
- plenty of admin webapp patches need to be merged; Amy and Larry were
the last persons seen maintaining this feature, so can one of you two do
it if you have time ?
Haven't had much time to spend on admin lately. Let me try to spend some
time on admin before the next release to upd
Hi,
I'd like to follow on with the one-release-a-month rythm for now, since
we still have interesting bugfixes here and there (ex: the cross context
fix, plus some JSP fixes). So this means tagging 5.0.20 at the end of
next week.
It would be a good idea to attempt to fix all the remaining BZ i
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Any comments on this ?
All done. The changes are not too intrusive, since TC 5 already required
JMX.
This should hopefully make Tomcat useable through JMX remote on JDK 1.5
(which was my plan, if you remember my emails a few weeks ago).
The object name to use in most cases
Jan Luehe wrote:
This is a bug. The String[] returned by req.getParameterValues() should
have been a clone.
I just committed a fix.
I'd like to point out that this "bug" is not worth any performance drop.
You should move those clones to the case where there's a security manager.
Rémy
---
Randy Watler wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Randy Watler wrote:
I am currently experimenting with the Java 1.5 remote JMX/MBeans for
use in our build process.
...
Can anyone clarify how the "createStandardContext" should be invoked?
You can look at the JBoss integration code fo
Larry Isaacs wrote:
Sorry, bad assumption on my part. I was looking out for
the 4.1.30 tag in jakarta-tomcat-4.0 and didn't realize
that jakarta-tomcat-connectors had been tagged the day
before.
Since a 4.1.31 isn't likely, I'll prepare a patch to correct
this for 4.1.30.
I have nothing against re
Amy Roh wrote:
K. I can reproduce the problem with 4.1.30 build but not in the workspace.
Looks like the latest org.apache.coyote.tomcat4.CoyoteConnector with
allowTrace didn't get tagged for 4.1.30. 4.1.30 tag has outdated
o.a.c.tomcat4.CoyoteConnector
4.1.30 was tagged about one month befor
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Howdy,
I think the files
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-5.0-
doc/architecture/requestProcess/requestProcess.pdf
and
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-5.0-
doc/architecture/startup/serverStartup.pdf
are broken.
They're broken on the web site, but they're OK in
jean-frederic clere wrote:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&email1=&emailtype1=substring&emailassigned_to1=1&email2=&emailtype2=substring&emailreporter2=1&bugidtype=include&bug_id=&changedin=&votes=&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&chfie
Henri Gomez wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17762
JNI problems
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-02-24 11:58
---
I think people should just avoid JNI for now. It doesn't give any
performance
boost anyway.
Ok, I'll a
Henri Gomez wrote:
ant or shells scripts ?
Pointers more than welcome
Here's one from commons-dev, and the reference page is here:
http://www.apache.org/dev/apply-license.html
Rémy
-
Henri Gomez wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
billbarker2004/02/22 15:32:15
Modified:src/examples/jsp/plugin plugin.html plugin.jsp plugin.txt
src/examples/jsp/plugin/applet Clock2.java
Log:
Updating to the Apache License v2.0.
Revision ChangesPath
1.4
The Tomcat Team announces the immediate availability of Apache Tomcat
5.0.18 Stable and Tomcat 4.1.30 Stable.
Please refer to the changelog for the list of changes.
Downloads:
Binaries: http://jakarta.apache.org/site/binindex.cgi
Sources: http://jakarta.apache.org/site/sourceindex.cgi
The Apache T
Paul Speed wrote:
Vano Beridze wrote:
If it would be a critical problem for me I would propose :)
I was just impressed by so aggresive behaviour. Tomcat list was always
friendly to me.
Don't see it as aggressive behavior. See at as someone who tries to
keep the bug database trimmed to only thos
Aaron Dykstra wrote:
Made the modifications to the license.
This is not the problem ;)
Could you make it that the whole file isn't changed in your diff ?
Just the actual lines changed.
Rémy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECT
So I will anounce Tomcat 5.0.19 and 4.1.30 on monday. What about 3.3.2,
BTW ?
Rémy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Howdy,
Also, please use the 2.0 license ;) (http://www.apache.org/licenses/).
That's ok, we still have 10 days to switch :)
Rémy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [E
Aaron wrote:
? jakarta-tomcat-catalina/site.patch
Index:
jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/ant/AbstractC
atalinaTask.java
I'm not thrilled about the feature, but the most problematic is that
this is a bad patch.
You might as well post the whole file ;)
Rémy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
billbarker2004/02/18 19:44:00
Modified:jk/java/org/apache/jk/common HandlerRequest.java
Log:
Fix JMX Request registration.
And, yes I did test it this time :).
Reported By: Jess Holle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Do you want a new 5.0.20 release to pick this u
Guenter Knauf wrote:
This is as intended, and is indeed a change in behavior. I
understand it could cause trouble for some applications, but is a
lot cleaner and more efficient.
but it prevents to move applications from TC4 to TC5 since they dont
work out-of-the-box as before, f.e. *.war. isnt ther
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Release 5.0.19 as Stable:
[X] Yes
[ ] No
This build seems ok overall. (I'll move it for mirrorring)
Rémy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jess Holle wrote:
*Feb 17, 2004 5:01:39 PM org.apache.jk.common.HandlerRequest
decodeRequest
WARNING: Error registering request*
For some reason, the request isn't registered in JMX (which is used
for). It wasn't registered either in previous builds, so I suppose it's
not a big change ;)
Guenter Knauf wrote:
Hi,
Release 5.0.19 as Stable: [x] Yes [ ] No
tested that it starts fine and that the samples work on: SuSE Linux
7.0 + 8.2 mod_jk2 JVM Sun 1.4.2_03 Novell NetWare 6.5 mod_jk2 JVM Sun
1.4.2_02 Novell NetWare 6.0 mod_jk2 JVM Sun 1.4.1_05 Win2K SP4
mod_jk2 JVM Sun 1.4.2_03 WinX
Release 5.0.19 as Stable:
[ ] Yes
[ ] No
Rémy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Henri Gomez wrote:
Hi to all,
I take a look at bugzilla and fix some bug reports.
It seems there is still problems in :
* JNI
Maybe in part classpath related issues. I have IIS 5 setup with JK 2 on
my Win2k computer, and will use this to test it with 5.0.19.
* IIS #15278
* Conflict with other
801 - 900 of 3058 matches
Mail list logo
