Hi!
I tried to configure tomcat 4.0.2 to use my own class loader implementation
for web-app class loading. The documentation implies that this can be done
by secifying a loaderClass attribute in my Context/Loader element in
server.xml.
This does not work.
Stepping through the code of
on 4/23/02 2:33 PM, Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To get around this, Zero G has
offered to donate a license of InstallAnywhere to Tomcat, as well as
installer code.
I have a strong -1 on this unless the licese is granted to ALL Jakarta
projects.
It isn't fair to judge one
remm02/04/24 01:06:14
Modified:.RUNNING.txt
Log:
- Document that the configuration needs to be modified to be able to run the
admin and manager webapp with CATALINA_BASE.
- Fixes bug 5166.
Revision ChangesPath
1.5 +13 -1
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5166.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Good/free advertising for zerog if installanywhere is used!
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
remm02/04/24 01:39:53
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core
ApplicationContext.java
Log:
- Fixes bug 6662.
- The problem was that, given two context /foo and /foobar, doing
ServletContext.getContext(/foobar) in context /foo would
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6662.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
To keep things simple and use existing code, I think we should use
the current marshalling/demarshalling code ( ajp13 ) to store/get
informations from each slot.
Why not just use native read/write on int/strings ?
If we treat shm as a byte[] and use java code to process it -
we can run
Hi,
I wish to retrieve / store values of multiple checkboxes checked in the
previous page. The problem here is I dont know how many boxes (a dynamic
amount of them is output), and the checkboxes must have the same name. I
wish to do something similar to Hotmail where I check an amount of
After investigation of virtually every other possibility, it seems that
mod_jk (AJP 1.3) fails to respond to queries that originate from
RealPlayer (v8 and RealOne on win32 tested). The platform is RedHat
Linux, running Apache 1.3 with mod_jk to Tomcat 4.0.1 (mod_jk from
4.0.3). Any other
Don't want to do the OSS passionaria but we should try
to use only OSS tools on Apache.
NSIS is OSS so keep.
For Free Java installer we have :
IZPack :
http://www.izforge.com/izpack/
VAInstall :
http://vainstall.sourceforge.net/
FreeInstaller :
Care - The original text contains a virus
Sender of the infected attachment: issa
Subject of the message: Continue, select one of the above, and then
One or more attachments were quarantined.
Attachment Vvyc.exe was Quarantined for the following reasons:
Virus W32.Klez.H@mm was found.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8263.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7575.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Don't want to do the OSS passionaria but we should try
to use only OSS tools on Apache.
NSIS is OSS so keep.
Sure, no problem.
The licensing terms seems ok to me, so I wanted to see if the community was
ok about it (apparently not).
So even if this installer is provided in addition to
NSIS is OSS so keep.
Sure, no problem.
The licensing terms seems ok to me, so I wanted to see if the
community was
ok about it (apparently not).
So even if this installer is provided in addition to other OSS based
installers, it's not ok ? Since when is this project refusing
contributions
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8459.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8459.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I don't refuse anything, just expose that I'd rather like an OSS
Java installer.
(The main advantage is that we wouldn't have to build the script, since they
would be contributing one, but I'm repeating myself)
Yes you're right and I was thinking at them will clicking 'send button'
for my
remm02/04/24 04:58:00
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/resources
messages.properties
jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/servlet JspServlet.java
Log:
- Fix bug 7575.
- Jasper now keeps track of the availability status of each
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7575.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
remm02/04/24 04:59:03
Modified:.RELEASE-PLAN-4.1.txt
Log:
- Update bug status.
Revision ChangesPath
1.4 +1 -6 jakarta-tomcat-4.0/RELEASE-PLAN-4.1.txt
Index: RELEASE-PLAN-4.1.txt
Hi,
I'm using Apache Tomcat 4.0.3 (OS - Win2000). I've encountered the problem
of -
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: oracle/jdbc/driver/OracleDriver
I can successfully compile the java file which is basically for DB utility
and the way I'm loading the oracle driver is mentioned below -
(Line
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8024.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
keith 02/04/24 05:26:23
Modified:.build.xml
Log:
Fix build with the http11 connector
Revision ChangesPath
1.177 +1 -1 jakarta-tomcat/build.xml
Index: build.xml
===
RCS file:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8465.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
A must read from Filip ;)
http://www.theserverside.com/resources/article.jsp?l=Tomcat
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
--
I've already
included the classes12.zip classes111.zip file under the classpath
(jdk1.3.1).
Any suggestion?
2 suggestions:
1) Use tomcat-user for this kind of messages.. Thanks..
2) None of Tomcat versions ( 3.x or 4.x ) reads zip files from the jar
repositories ( web-inf/lib nor any of
Affected versions: Tomcat 4 version up to 4.0.3
Possible bugs:
1) handleComment is never called on the EventListener
handleComment should be called as far as i understand
because the parser can't really know if the code-gen backend
uses the comments.
diff for Parser.java
@@ -440,7 +440,10 @@
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8468.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8468.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
remm02/04/24 07:11:18
Modified:xdocsresources.xml
Log:
- Add clustering article by Filip Hanik and the Tomcat book project to the list.
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +9 -2 jakarta-tomcat-site/xdocs/resources.xml
Index: resources.xml
Thanks Remy ;)
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8468.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8470.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
+1 from me.
Having a cross-platform and consistent installer would be good for tomcat.
My only concern - I hope the 'one licence' would cover all versions of
tomcat and more than one release manager ( and maybe it can be assigned to
Mr. Gump and automated ).
Costin
On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Remy
I believe Apache httpd server is using MSI and InstallShield -
and this is neither cross-ASF nor free.
I'm not sugesting an exclusive deal with InstallAnywhere -
we can try one of the OSS installers in parallel ( if
someone has the time to do so ) and if they provide the
same features, we'll
+1 from me.
Having a cross-platform and consistent installer would be good for tomcat.
My only concern - I hope the 'one licence' would cover all versions of
tomcat and more than one release manager ( and maybe it can be assigned to
Mr. Gump and automated ).
That's brilliant. This way, if
Heads up on this virus.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
That is probably a virus!
issa wrote:
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This will be my last post of these viruses, since they seem to be
proliferating here.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'd like to call for a vote on the Apache Tomcat 4.1 Release Plan.
The vote will run until 04/26, and will be followed, if the Release Plan is
accepted, by a vote for the release of Apache Tomcat 4.1 Beta 1.
ballot
[ ] +1 I approve this plan, and will help
[ ] +0 I approve this plan, but can't
[X] +1 I approve this plan, and will help
[ ] +0 I approve this plan, but can't help
[ ] -0 I am not in favor of this plan
[ ] -1 I am against this plan, because:
I will try and get the NetWare plugins for the JK2 stuff built and
posted.
Mike Anderson
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL
GOMEZ Henri wrote:
I don't refuse anything, just expose that I'd rather like
an OSS Java installer.
I've recently been pointedly reminded that I'm not even a
committer, but as the project guidelines encourage developers
to comment and cast a nonbinding vote, I'll put on my
flameproof
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote:
I'd like to call for a vote on the Apache Tomcat 4.1 Release Plan.
The vote will run until 04/26, and will be followed, if the Release Plan is
accepted, by a vote for the release of Apache Tomcat 4.1 Beta 1.
ballot
[X] +1 I approve this plan,
InstallAnywhere has both binary and byte-code installers. In fact the
binary installers is just a self-estracting executable with byte-code. So
in essence it works on any platform that has a JVM. InstallAnywhere is
stable, very easy to use both as an end-user and as a build manager. I'm
not
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7686.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Remy Maucherat wrote:
I'd like to call for a vote on the Apache Tomcat 4.1 Release Plan.
The vote will run until 04/26, and will be followed, if the Release Plan is
accepted, by a vote for the release of Apache Tomcat 4.1 Beta 1.
ballot
[ ] +1 I approve this plan, and will help
[ ] +0 I
ballot
[X] +1 I approve this plan, and will help
Usual rpm packaging, connector stuff for Linux
with/without eapi.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1
Costin
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote:
I'd like to call for a vote on the Apache Tomcat 4.1 Release Plan.
The vote will run until 04/26, and will be followed, if the Release Plan is
accepted, by a vote for the release of Apache Tomcat 4.1 Beta 1.
ballot
[ ] +1 I approve
Kevin Grey wrote:
So in essence it works on any platform that has a JVM.
Nah, it only works fully on officially supported platforms.
Which makes sense, because the whole advantage of using a good
installer is that it paves over the nasty platform-specific
install issues. There's a list
ballot
[X] +1 I approve this plan, and will help
[ ] +0 I approve this plan, but can't help
[ ] -0 I am not in favor of this plan
[ ] -1 I am against this plan, because:
/ballot
Larry
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8478.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5735.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Volker Leidl wrote:
I tried to configure tomcat 4.0.2 to use my own class loader implementation
for web-app class loading. The documentation implies that this can be done
by secifying a loaderClass attribute in my Context/Loader element in
server.xml.
Loader specifies an
There are a few additional items I would like to see added.
1. Port my recent mod_jk/apache1.3 new features to mod_jk/Apache2.0
and to jk2 as costin requested. This makes those connectors for
use with Apache more consistent.
Ok.
2. Resolve a problem Craig mentioned with Context
+1 on the idea.
With minor changes, we can also implement a compiler server that compiles
out-of-date pages in the background thread. This would greatly improve
the response time for accessing the pages, when recompilations are needed.
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 10:52:51 -0500
From: Glenn
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote:
I'd say I hope it won't be needed, as the HEAD branch has recieved all the
bugfixes the main branch had. From the get go, I'd say it should be
reasonably stable. So at least to see where we are in terms of stability, I
really want to cut a Beta 1
Dear Tomcat Dev,
Is there a website that have the instruction on how to connection Tomcat 4
with Apache 2? Please help. Made me running tomcat as module of apache.
thanks
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 8:44 AM
Subject: [VOTE] Release Plan for Apache Tomcat 4.1
I'd like to call for a vote on the Apache Tomcat 4.1 Release Plan.
The vote will run until 04/26, and will be
Christopher K. St. John wrote:
Loader specifies an org.apache.catalina.Loader object, not an
java.lang.ClassLoader. You'd need to do something like this:
Ack. You were talking about the loaderClass attribute, not the
className attribute. I wasn't paying close enough attention,
sorry. But
+1
Amy
Remy Maucherat wrote:
I'd like to call for a vote on the Apache Tomcat 4.1 Release Plan.
The vote will run until 04/26, and will be followed, if the Release Plan is
accepted, by a vote for the release of Apache Tomcat 4.1 Beta 1.
ballot
[ ] +1 I approve this plan, and will help
Via webmaster, please check the Original Message that follows.
Have fun,
Paulo Gaspar
-Original Message-
From: Erik Agsjo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 9:59 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PGP-keys
Hi.
paranoia
I just downloaded the tomcat
Via webmaster, please check the Original Message that follows.
Have fun,
Paulo Gaspar
-Original Message-
From: Gunnar Schomaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 12:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: starting problems with tomcat packages on os x
costin 02/04/24 12:45:09
Modified:jk/java/org/apache/jk/server JkCoyoteHandler.java
JkMain.java
Log:
Potential fix for 8478.
Check if the response has been already commited, and don't recommit.
Display a small info notice - COMMIT action shouldn't
Here is an excerpt of an email I sent Ignacio detailing some of the issues I
am finding:
Basically, it seems as though the entire issue is centered around
authentication through
the ISAPI Filter.
I am thinking that the filter is also having trouble with:
Webfolders - because it first sends a
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Glenn Nielsen wrote:
There are a few additional items I would like to see added.
1. Port my recent mod_jk/apache1.3 new features to mod_jk/Apache2.0
and to jk2 as costin requested. This makes those connectors for
use with Apache more consistent.
mod_jk2 has
kinman 02/04/24 14:12:53
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Node.java
PageDataImpl.java
Log:
- Removed the static field in Node.java, because it is not thread safe.
Instead rely on traversing the nodes to find the page root.
Hello,
I just had a bug in one of my servlets. It was forwarding to itself. Not a
big problem, but, it caused Tomcat to crash. This is the first time Tomcat
crashed with me, so I'm really surprised.
Code snippet:
//adr is a String with the name of the servlet.
RequestDispatcher dispatcher
Costin has suggested to me in a private email that the Tomcat project could
adopt the Apache 2 numbering scheme (starting with Apache Tomcat 4.1).
I think this is a good idea.
For the uninitiated, the numbering is:
major.minor.build build_stability
So for example, the first 4.1.x release would
De: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviado el: miércoles 24 de abril de 2002 23:41
Which will be the rules to advance the build numbers?
Saludos ,
Ignacio J. Ortega
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Which will be the rules to advance the build numbers?
The method in httpd land seems to be once every 1-2 weeks, as long as there
are significant changes. Sometimes, one major change (minor security fix or
higher priority fix) is enough to cause a build number advance.
Remy
--
To
I like the idea. +1 for me.
Amy
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Costin has suggested to me in a private email that the Tomcat project could
adopt the Apache 2 numbering scheme (starting with Apache Tomcat 4.1).
I think this is a good idea.
For the uninitiated, the numbering is:
major.minor.build
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 11:20:47AM +0200, GOMEZ Henri wrote:
After investigation of virtually every other possibility, it seems that
mod_jk (AJP 1.3) fails to respond to queries that originate from
RealPlayer (v8 and RealOne on win32 tested). The platform is RedHat
Linux, running Apache
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Ignacio J. Ortega wrote:
De: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviado el: miércoles 24 de abril de 2002 23:41
Which will be the rules to advance the build numbers?
Probably every time the release manager feels the code is stable and
better than the
+0
Saludos ,
Ignacio J. Ortega
-Mensaje original-
De: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviado el: miércoles 24 de abril de 2002 17:44
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Asunto: [VOTE] Release Plan for Apache Tomcat 4.1
I'd like to call for a vote on the Apache Tomcat 4.1
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Ignacio J. Ortega wrote:
De: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviado el: miércoles 24 de abril de 2002 23:41
Which will be the rules to advance the build numbers?
Probably every time the release manager feels the code is stable and
better than the
Hola,
isapi_redirector2.dll has started to load and log this night :) and is
giving me a beautiful NPE when trying the ajp13 connector from tc33,
it's suppoused to work, ?
i have some caveats about the way the default logger logs by default ;),
the code is trying printf to stderr, what can i
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote:
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 14:59:45 -0700
From: Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] New version numbering scheme
Which will be the
nacho 02/04/24 16:00:14
Modified:jk/native2/server/isapi jk_isapi_plugin.c jk_iis.h
Log:
* Reading the config file
* Removed some debug code
* Load and does some logging :)
XXX: trying ajp13 worker issues a NPE, needs absolute paths for be able to log.
Revision
nacho 02/04/24 16:06:07
Modified:jk/native2/server/isapi jk_isapi_plugin.c
Log:
Doh, Build then commit ;)
Revision ChangesPath
1.9 +9 -9
jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/server/isapi/jk_isapi_plugin.c
Index: jk_isapi_plugin.c
First - Nacho, my next commit ( probably tommorow, after I check
everything ) will be large, please commit whatever you have changed
and I'll resolve the conflicts.
The biggest change is using JK_OK / JK_ERR consistently for return
types and using java style
rc=function()
if( rc != JK_OK )
nacho 02/04/24 16:11:11
Modified:jk/native2 build.xml
Log:
* Less libs needed to build mod_jk2
* Changed the name to isapi_redirector2
Revision ChangesPath
1.23 +3 -3 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/build.xml
Index: build.xml
nacho 02/04/24 16:12:50
Modified:jk/native2/common jk_uriMap.c jk_logger_file.c
jk/native2/server/apache2 jk_service_apache2.c
jk/native2/include jk_service.h
Log:
* Cosmetics
* win32 tweaks to build
Revision ChangesPath
1.24 +2 -2
costin 02/04/24 16:20:38
Modified:jk/java/org/apache/jk/server JkCoyoteHandler.java
Log:
extra 't'
Revision ChangesPath
1.16 +1 -1
jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/java/org/apache/jk/server/JkCoyoteHandler.java
Index: JkCoyoteHandler.java
kinman 02/04/24 16:49:05
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/servlet JspServlet.java
Log:
- Fixed a typo that causes class not to be loaded after compiling the page.
Revision ChangesPath
1.5 +1 -1
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5585.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
First - Nacho, my next commit ( probably tommorow, after I check
everything ) will be large, please commit whatever you have changed
and I'll resolve the conflicts.
Done, go ahead..
Is it a NPE or a core dump ? I got it working with Apache + 3.3, 4.0,
4.1 ( ajp13-socket, unix, jni ), but
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5666.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Thu, 2002-04-25 at 01:44, Remy Maucherat wrote:
I'd like to call for a vote on the Apache Tomcat 4.1 Release Plan.
The vote will run until 04/26, and will be followed, if the Release Plan is
accepted, by a vote for the release of Apache Tomcat 4.1 Beta 1.
ballot
[ ] +1 I approve this
On Thu, 2002-04-25 at 02:37, Duncan McLean wrote:
* Beginning October 17, 2001, it is permissable to redistribute *
* the javac compiler with the Java 2 Runtime Environment (JRE).*
Which gives permission to JRE packagers like IBM to include javac in the
JRE. Most JRE's still
On Thu, 2002-04-25 at 07:41, Remy Maucherat wrote:
ballot
[X] Yes
[ ] No
/ballot
I actually like the Linux style, with odd minor numbers for unstable
releases and even for stable ones, but this is not bad too.
Bojan
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5903.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Thu, 25 Apr 2002, Ignacio J. Ortega wrote:
keep all logs, confs, files in the same place ).
This can work for apache, win32 or *x but for IIS it's really hard, i
much prefer to keep all this things near tomcat, not near the System32
directory :), anyway having a totally agnostic
hung [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dear Tomcat Dev,
Is there a website that have the instruction on how to connection Tomcat 4
with Apache 2? Please help. Made me running tomcat as module of apache.
This sort of question is most appropriate on the Tomcat User list.
The documentation for
Hi All,
Is there is a setting in Jasper to disable Tomcat from checking the
timestamp on the page everytime there is a request? It seems important as
the more include files are there in the JSP page the more checking that
could happen, additionaly due to the nature of Java creating a File object
96 matches
Mail list logo
